What's So Special About Paul Tillich?

Thanks so much for watching today’s video, I hope you enjoy it. Don’t forget to like and share the video, and if you’re new, consider subscribing.
Paul Tillich’s way of framing theology answers some important concerns which drive people from religion in general and Christian theology in particular. We’re going to set up the theological options, explain some common stumbling blocks which have caused people to misunderstand Christianity, and then get into the way Tillich overcomes these by highlighting the positive features of his approach. Check this out.
Help support the channel at ko-fi.com/tenonreligion
0:00 Intro
1:20 Theological options
4:40 Stumbling blocks to Christianity
7:12 Positive features of Tillich’s approach
10:16 Wrap-up
*Info/Gear*
Transcript at tenonreligion.com
Twitter: @ReligionTen, @DrMarkBanas
TikTok: @drbanas
Graphics by Mark Banas. Images by Mark Banas and in public domain except where noted.
Video editing software: Davinci Resolve, Blackmagic Design
Equipment: Google Pixel 5a 5G, Glide Gear TMP 50 teleprompter, Sunpak Pro Series 66 tripod, Pop Voice PV510+ Lavalier microphone, Elegant Teleprompter app

[@lalannej]

Great to see anyone talking real philosophy, but it may be more technical information than the general public can follow. I'd work on breaking it down into smaller and simpler concepts. And that will give you plenty to work on for producing more videos. Over time, the channel will grow.

[@ivtch51]

Thx. It seems to me that Paul Tillich's approach takes away the fundamentalist certainty (both biblical and dogmatic) that many of us were nursed on for so long. This approach seems to require a profound, humble openness and an acceptance that we can never know/experience the fullness of the Ground of Being (Ultimate Existence/Reality); only our space, time inflection. This could easily lead one on a mystical path. I need to explore Tillich's thought more.

[@ralphstarling6707]

What do I think? I have no idea!. I am just happy to be here!

[@lakemartinliving]

great video

[@maureengallant5066]

I've got to go with Barth, but that is because I rely on my personal experience and I can't easily walk away from that as a believer, however I do see that my anecdotal evidence doesn't provide security for others who are either unsure, or actively searching. So overall I think Tillich's systematic theology is the best of all choices....but still, ,for me? Barth seems to win.

[@Alkemisti]

I am inclined to agree with both neoplatonic and existentialist theologies. It would make sense that religious truths would have many valid situation-relevant interpretations (because they are _logos_ to everyone at all times), but there would still be the ladder of the mystical ascent behind them---interpretations being a vehicle to elevate us from different kinds of swamps. Doctrine, scripture, myths, and rites are temporal truth-expressions of the eternal Truth that cannot be expressed with exact precision. It is possible to read these texts _(forma)_ in different relative ways but at the same time believe they have an absolute ineffable reality _(substantia)_ behind them. Like God has one essence but many uncreated energies (to use Palamite concepts). I do not say that _anything_ goes, but more than one might.

[@junpark9398]

Can you do a video regarding preterism? There are a wide spectrums of preterism, but would hear more about Daniel E. Harden’s thinking.

[@TenOnReligion]

Eschatology is not a research area or strong interest of mine so I probably won't be doing an episode on preterism anytime soon.

[@ParokyaNiJoe]

I think even if he were Christian, his Philosophy can really apply to modern Islam as well

[@TenOnReligion]

Yes, theoretically it's meant for all religions. Robert Neville took Tillich's main framework and did just that but he's retired now. I have some older episodes on Neville but I need to update them. Hopefully soon.

[@Megaritz]

Where does atheism fit into the taxonomy of options at the start? Is it a variant of nihilism, or a variant of the "God as ground of being" view? Or is it not in the taxonomy?

[@TenOnReligion]

Great question. For Tillich atheism probably wouldn't have been considered a theological option since it's not technically "theology" but it's definitely a wider religious option since there are religious traditions which are atheistic. A-theism is "no god" but not necessarily "no religion."