What's the right way to do history taking in Phase 1?

[@parisjahan1552]

It was very insightful, Thank you!

[@wandagreen8355]

Just completed basic training and really trying to find my way with EMDR. This discussion was helpful

[@benlea19]

Time line is an interesting one, as some therapies really emphasize this and can be a really important aspect of relationship building and understanding the client, but also allowing them to share their story, something which they might not have done before.

[@marias8244]

Fabulous video -- thank you so much for sharing your clinical expertise! This feels much more client-centered and trauma-informed than the drier way I was originally taught.

[@manuelamonacelli6998]

This was so helpful and you just have a way of "not making EMDR like a big deal" - in a good way :) This is so refreshing as it was so not the message I was given on my training, and that left me terrified of using EMDR! Thank you!

[@marcyxboxbird1135]

Great insight! Real and honest. Thank you!

[@MRTIBURONTIBURON]

Excellent discussion!

[@careymilne9501]

This info is sooo helpful. Thank you!

[@KambriaEvansEMDR]

To learn more about client-centered and clinician-centered EMDR, visit www.zerodisturbance.com/the-map

[@catawaller740]

Very helpful, thank you, it was addressing exactly the question I had in my head :)

[@bspi624]

Great discussion

[@ezzahsaifullah]

Beautifully explained

[@KambriaEvansEMDR]

Thank you so much 🙂

[@futures2247]

trouble is we don't remember literally but constructively and memory changes whenever we bring things to mind in all sorts of ways - then there is the glaring issues with the research - analysis of which seems to fall into three camps. one camp is done by those with the most skin in the game, the Shapiros's the Becks etc and its thoroughly biased but believed blindly by its adherents, this group I think of as the 'pure believers' they think the research is honest and solid and the key is in their own model or techniques they are selling- the other group are still believers and have skin in the game but are at least honest enough to say its not therapy model or techniques that matters but the 'common factors' the biggest factor has nothing to do with therapy but is all about the persons own resources coming into therapy, resources in the broadest sense - then its placebo then relationship and shared goals. Then we have the final group or the more honest people without skin in the game - People like William M Epstein etc who take the best clinical research and dismantles it and analyses the details carefully - what he shows is there is ZERO credible research evidence that ANY therapy has any efficacy and it can also be harmful. This latter group is barely known about because the industry is a triumph of marketing over substance just like so much else in our sick cultures where we're encouraged to literally feed on each others pain, pleasure, guilt and trauma - the road to hell is so commonly paved with good intentions.