What 'Varignon's Theory says? - EM2.02 Engineering Mechanics in Tamil

[@surendrandharmarajan6637]

Super sir

[@sivasubramani2820]

thank u sir.I learnt more from your videos.

[@sakthisakthi3077]

Sir pls kindly upload Dynamic of machinary 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏

[@sowmyasoodamani7225]

Thank you sir

[@indrajithramachandran4354]

Sir i have a doubt sir!!!! Urgent sir

[@tsnaveen6987]

clear explanation sir

[@thamaraiselvansampath6099]

Thank u sir

[@gokulramesh4989]

f1 and f2 renduthukum perpendicular distance la dhana multiply pannanum then epd sir r(OA) vaala renduthukum multiply panringa.

[@manikandans7584]

Only F1 have a perpendicular distance...so ..we know moment = force * perpendicular distance...and F2 have no perpendicular distance at point O.then...how you are taking moment F2..while...it has no perpendicular distance about O.

[@gokulramesh4989]

@@manikandans7584 actually F1 kooda OA ku perpendicular irukanum avasiyam illa, idhu summa demonstration ku sollirukaru nenaikran namma actually ellathukum perpendicular kandupudichi dha podanum

[@manikandans7584]

@@gokulramesh4989broo...F1 vanthu OA ku kandipaa PERPENDICULAR AHH irukanum...apd iruntha matumey... moment kandupidika mudium....we know tht varignon theorem...the algebraic sum of moments of point= resultant of moments at same point......

[@gokulramesh4989]

@@manikandans7584 not necessarily bro, F1 vandhu horizontal ah iruku but OA distance is at some angle with x axis, so F1 and OA also not perpendicular!