Is the Gaza Pier Mission Over? | Report from the Gaza Pier | Breakdown of Pier Operations

[@brianhoag8812]

I said "F**k Me" 6 times during your presentation. This was considered a viable operation? Maybe they should have kept a few LST's around instead of expending them as targets.

[@theophrastus3.056]

Fortunately, the government is always ready to F-you. And they’ll do it with money they took from someone else they’re also F-ing.

[@therchas]

This operation wasn’t for viability and effectiveness but for political optics

[@Sagart999]

@@therchas Spot on!

[@RyTrapp0]

@@therchas Right - but they failed at the 'political optics' goal because they failed at the viability and effectiveness of the operation. I don't exactly "watch the news" at this point, but I haven't noticed any media trying to put a positive spin on this.

[@yrobtsvt]

​@@RyTrapp0I think you are right. The need has not lessened at all, so the end of the operation implies that they've failed in the optics objectives. Most of the food is just sitting on the end of the pier because Israel has targeted food aid trucks and killed food aid workers multiple times

[@mbjackson8029]

I felt from the beginning this was a half ass effort. Publicity stunt that didn’t work.

[@jerseyshoredroneservices225]

I wouldn't call it a half assed effort. It was an ineffective plan from the beginning but the people who are executing the plan are putting forth maximum effort. Publicity stunt? I guess you could call with that. A lot of people around the country and the world were demanding that "something" be done so the big shots decided to do something, even if they knew it would be ineffective from the beginning.

The big guy needed to get his 10% cut.

[@maverickmyrtlebeach]

Bail is going to be a lot, 10% may not cover it.

[@tomhenry897]

Got biden votes

[@dirtdevil70]

My question...given how susceptible the pier is to weather ( 3 ft waves max) does the entire system have any practical use in military times?

[@buddystewart2020]

So, they decided to use a tool that wasn't made for this situation in the first place, so, naturally, lets launch an investigation. A news report I read either yesterday or the day before said, one of the problems is once the supplies are moved onto the beach, they're just sitting there. The aid trucks that were moving the stuff inland were getting attacked, so they're having trouble moving it off the beach. If that's true, it wouldn't matter if you were able to move more onto the beach.

[@bosshog8844]

Hamas is not attacking aide trucks. Israel has been launching missile strikes on food aide workers though.

[@stnln2180]

​@@bosshog8844 Yeah.... sure... and Hamas didn't rape and butchered all of those Jews too.... Do you really think this is Al Jazeera audience?😂

@@bosshog8844 Liar. They were terrorists operating under cover as "aid workers". In other words, legitimate targets.

[@wrldvw1836]

Hamas is in bedded in the aid trucks and are using them as cover to attack Israel. Also, Hamas steals all the aid. This was a known disaster before it ever started

[@buddystewart2020]

@@bosshog8844 ... So you're going to take one high profile incident and extrapolate that out to - Israel is attacking all food trucks? You're smart, wow.

[@robertrussell3264]

Polly Anna here. Maybe the humiliation will motivate the government to address this massive void in our future capabilities. Shoot if we can't quickly put up a functional pier we are probably not ready for a major conflict.

[@SennaAugustus]

They don't want to succeed here, that's the point. It's just a way to spend some money whilst supporting Israel.

[@DoctorMandible]

Graft is the point. Efficacy is meaningless.

[@koffeekage]

MISSION ACCOMPLISHED!

[@cyberninjazero5659]

Damn you beat me to it

[@shlosher]

lol

[@rockbutcher]

They are being pretty selective about what they put into that $230M dollar amount. When you figure in fuel for the ships, salaries, wear and tear on equipment there is no way in hell that whole schmozz only cost $230M. The true cost will make airborne drops look cheap. Rushed plan, rushed gear...bad outcome.

[@miamisasquatch]

But also consider the training opportunity and effectiveness assessment of a platform with limited operational history

[@ianshaver8954]

Keep in mind you’re paying the warship crew salaries either way.

[@deplorable1-2]

Someone needs to take a look at the Matson ops leaving the West Coast for Hawaii. A tad over a million POUNDS a day is sick. And the cargo is stacked onshore waiting to either rot or be stolen by guys with guns. What a waste of money and personnel for virtually zero.

[@dave8218]

I would imagine the govt just walks away from that pier, look what they left behind in Afghanistan. 230 million is a drop in the Mediterranean.

[@ryder6070]

Too many camera phones

[@keithhigh7773]

Brit here. Yes, it might be a drop in the ocean, but it is $ 230 million dollars that is not available for aid for the Palestinian people or to help homeless people in America. I suppose the best that can be said is that the Democrats tried, whereas the Repugnants would have done bugger all.

@@keithhigh7773 It was a scam from the very beginning.

[@hotsoup1001]

​@@keithhigh7773yup, and you better get ready to cry in November, cause all this nonsense will be going away.

[@jakeoreilly9627]

looks like d day

[@badbob9596]

Another complete waste of US taxpayer money so a politician can say He cares.

[@tomriley5790]

Not really, there will have been lots of lessons learnt form this and it will likely inform future developments and capabilities that are developed, you often learn more from relative failures than you do from success. At least they tried.

[@chuckrogers5077]

@@tomriley5790 The lessons learned from this could have been learned by simply thinking it through instead of spending hundreds of millions..

[@duenge]

@@tomriley5790 This was done to appease the Arab population in the US. Given that US troops were not allowed to set their feet on the sand, this pier could not be properly installed and maintained. Great job Biden....And face it, this was just deliveries into the hands of Hamas, since they run the place.

[@elhueso4330]

Man I'm here on one of these ships and it's a real shit show total waste of our money

[@duenge]

@@elhueso4330 Getting any harassment from the locals?

[@bobbyirvin2502]

Small tugs are loaded with causeway. Not sailed across the pond. Thank you for the updates on your channel. 👊 Retired Army Master Mariner / Master Diver

[@garymartin9777]

please elaborate... what's a causeway in this context? Thank you for your service, sir.

[@blshouse]

@@garymartin9777 The causeway is the technically correct name for the "pier".

[@johnchin1456]

It was never intended to be an viable solution, doesn't take an expert to know this was for P.R purposes

[@PaulToth-lc2cv]

I'm a nobody. And I knew that pier was NOT going to work out. Yes, the military is pulling it. But, I'm not talking about the pier.

[@afterglow5285]

You understand nothing, it was never intended to work, it was just a political move to save netanyahu from the ICC

[@blshouse]

@@afterglow5285 You mean to save Brandon from the pro-Hamas wing of his own party.

[@ligmasack9038]

@@afterglow5285 says the guy supporting TERRORISTS; let that sink in, 🤡

[@WTF2BlueTiger]

@@blshouse Cant believe there are such imbeciles watching this channel, this pier is an effort to send in humanitarian aid ONLY to a region which is having aid blocked by a US ally, instead of you know, just telling Israel to stop fucking blocking aid and if it refuses, block all non essential military aid to them (which is already forbidden under US law which is currently being brokeN)

[@JackPitmanNica]

The word "impotent" comes to mind

[@Echowhiskeyone]

I can think of two words, Charlie Foxtrot.

[@ProctorsGamble]

SNAFU perhaps 🤔

[@synupps877]

Who and/or what are you claiming to be impotent?

[@fmccloud]

Yeah it turns out that this a complex and delicate situation and no amount of snippy one liners from the KZbin content section is going change that.

[@JackPitmanNica]

@@fmccloud Dont defend a disgusting political move that helps Israel starve people

[@johnherrick7486]

Maybe it was all a false show of support never meant to succeed so as to make us look magnanimus..

[@More_Row]

I think you got it

[@robertoleary3004]

Bingo

[@radiosnail]

Should have read your comment before making mine.

[@sgs1262]

Nailed that

[@richdobbs6595]

My guess is that Biden made the decision to send the pier and was committed to it. But, from a strategic point of view of our ally Israel, they don't want Gaza to be resupplied. So no effort is being made to make this efficient.

[@Colinpark]

Absolutely the crews really deserve a lot of kudos for doing the best job they could in impossible conditions, both weather and political.

[@johncheresna]

What a waste, but I can't say I am surprised.

[@edwardrich2564]

Those navy divers, are pissed .

[@maverickmyrtlebeach]

You only get pay if under 1 fathom ~

[@balaklava6420]

Thanks for the update Sal.

[@Kim-J312]

It should have never ever been constructed !! They should ask why Egypt has 1000s of aid trucks on the Egyptian border side !!!

[@ramrod9556]

You can't starve a population if you have a reliable delivery system. By pretending this pier was going to be a workable solution, they were able to keep all the humanitarian aid out of this area.

[@Milo-id9qd]

Israel controls the border and won't let them through. Israel actually guards that border.

[@WALTERBROADDUS]

Maybe it's because the Egyptians are busy building a border wall? 🧱

[@noIMspartacus2]

Not sure if you are being "naive" or very cleverly showing what a disaster this devious, desperate scam is... Oh ffs... Does anyone really "think" that the pier has anything to do with "a concern about getting humanitarian aid to Palestinians"?!?!?! When will all the "experts" cut the crap and cut to the chase - this is ALL about trying to get the Palestinians out of the region to clear the way for the full control of the off shore GAS ZONES in a desperate bid by the nazionist/anglo/american/ nato and bankster parasites to retain some hegemony in the region and control of major future energy supplies to their bitch slapped nato stooges in Europe! But like their murderous scam in Ukraine, it is collapsing as well...

[@tpozzbarwani9977]

U mean sisi is busy​@@WALTERBROADDUS

[@jeffr6280]

Hard to believe our government would pick the least efficient, most expensive and dangerous way to do something. I'm sure the administration didn't have ulterior motives for doing any of this🙄.

[@WALTERBROADDUS]

It's no worse than a school district that gets four and a half billion dollars a year; still not be able to afford air conditioning or get rid of asbestos.

[@paulhusbands]

Hell no

[@jerseyshoredroneservices225]

If the goal was getting stuff into gaza this was a bad plan but I don't know that there are any better ones available. How would you suggest that they get supplies into gaza in a safer, cheaper, more efficient way?

[@DefaultProphet]

Blame Israel for them having to do use this method

[@paulhusbands]

@@DefaultProphet" I will bless them that bless you, I will curse them that curse you" said The Lord,

[@shlosher]

Thank you Sal.

[@edwardrich2564]

This is the most dumbstruck idea I've ever seen. And im a former marine.

[@psikogeek]

Subtle humor. I like it.

[@stco2426]

Thanks for showing this.

[@therchas]

Moving stuff by pallet is a standard for us navy operations. Most people are trained and experienced in only pallet operations. Container operations are simply not practical for carrier and replenishment at sea operations that the navy does. So I’m not surprised to see this being continued on this peir even if containers would be more efficient in this case

[@WALTERBROADDUS]

We are not doing a replenishment operation of a ship.

[@therchas]

@@WALTERBROADDUS yes but standard operating procedures have a tendency to used for operations they shouldn’t be used for in bureaucratic systems

[@WALTERBROADDUS]

@@therchas there's no cranes to lift containers. And I don't see any longshoreman.

[@herberthenry6213]

Very informative. Well done.

[@javajunky215]

Half a billion dollars wasted, anyone that knows anything about the Navy and Army mobile pier systems knew this was a disaster to begin with. How the flack did anyone not realize this wasn’t going to work and it needless put American Service men and women at risk.

[@kevinconville3199]

Grat show! Thank you.

[@deansawich6250]

Thanks Sal for another really informative and interesting video. This is what happens when Politicians call the shots, they are not known for taking reality into consideration. Hats off to all the Servicemen that have had to try and make a Politician's fantasy into a reality.

[@PapaOscarNovember]

I was always under the impression that the deliverables of this mission was not to move the needle on tons of aid transported, but rather to generate photos/videos of US soldiers doing something for Gazans so that US voters who sympathize with Palestinians can be placated. I’m pretty sure that’s the criterion by which decision on continuing the mission will be made.

[@ajc5479]

Strange, it was the military that planned and executed this operation.

[@peters-adventure]

@deansawich6250, I'm glad for your post. It most closely matches my sentiment. The episode's live videos show a how hazardous the operation is. The U.S. military designed an inadequate system for proper throughput. The Israeli military further jeopardized the humanitarian aid operation when they used the beach by the pier for a military evacuation. The pier is a worsening political failure. The pier should be shut down safely, to minimize injury or worse, to U.S. servicemen. Political pressure should be applied to Israel, to open the ports for aid to flow at higher throughput.

[@beardedskiper]

Great report, thank you!

[@patrickoconnor2401]

Good video, neutral, objective analysis, thank you. Is that a ‘willomy pine’ (from Australia) in the background? If so, awesome! Excuse the spelling, please.

[@carneeki]

I've seen eucalyptus when I was in Israel, the Wollemi Pine, would surprise me, they are native to only a small and specific area of the Blue Mountains just west of Sydney, and access is not permitted to the general public. That said, given how endangered the pine is, they can be purchased from nurseries to help prevent their extinction. Would be interesting to see if they were transported to Gaza in case something happened in Australia that killed the tree off. (sorry for going waaay off topic if you meant a different pine)

[@patrickoconnor2401]

@@carneeki Thank you for your concise reply, carneeki, I thought I recognized is from the very rough bark and the rather primitive, disheveled branches and ‘leaves’. I am aware of the protected status of that grove of plant life in Blue Mountains Australia, and I am interested in having a plant of my own when they become available. As far as I know, there are samples at the KEW and at a museum in Hamilton, Ontario Canada.

[@scducksscducks7511]

Love your channel, Sal. The "L" is silent in Moultrie. Properly pronounced "Moo-Tree".

[@ianwhitfield8169]

This was a glorified exercise to see how well the JLOLTS really work in a real life situation. The marine Corps are making a decision!

[@davidty2006]

Turns out... Same as mulberry, the weather is bloody pain.

[@miamisasquatch]

Hopefully we haven't built doctrine around these.

[@philliplopez1501]

We do infact have doctrine regarding mobile pier operations. I would call this a failed Beta test. And expect funding to replace this with a more viable system with next year's budget.

[@SpringIsBACK]

This system would work fine (if a bit expensively) in an environment for which it was designed.

[@Doug-d5o]

Good Reporting. Thanks.

[@mackfisher4487]

Sal, very informative particularly with your maritime background. (With tongue-in-cheek) Look out the Senate investigative committee will have you up giving testimony on the latest rounds of political sniping.

[@ardiffley-zipkin9539]

Great report, Sal. You should share it with Congress, especially the budget committees We are pouring money out with no success or reason. Look at our leadership. .

[@williamherrick497]

Enjoying a reliable update. Appreciate the UNCOLA - no hyperbolic adjectives or adverbs on this channel

[@johnherrick7486]

Another Herrick...

[@Jimmyfisher121]

As usual Sal thank you for the update.

[@erikjohnson3255]

The ST912 was definitely loaded onto another ship and carried over.

[@peteb6682]

Sal, you called it correctly from the get-go when this operation was announced, what 5 months ago!! You should provide the investigators a copy of your episode from months ago! You're a class act for not saying "I told you so!"

[@petersanderson8307]

Thanks!

[@joeparry-jones2790]

Good training. Very informative when compared to D day and the ensuing logistical problems you outlined in previous emissions. Thankyou.

[@dangvorbei5304]

It's a show, of course, and tonnage is gonna be reflected in grams on all the award citations. But I'm proud of all the Army sailors who are having to pull this mission out of thin air. And how DID that tug get there?

[@richardsevers7686]

Great update

[@mistersmith3368]

At time 7:43, I really enjoy seeing DoD is still using "left handed, metric shipyard wrench" not a properly sized wrench.

[@timshirk9892]

Thanks for the informative video. It makes reading between the lines a lot clearer on what is really going on here.

[@TulsAmerican]

That operation wasn’t about delivering aid. It was a “show”, failed spectacularly, and will soon disappear down the “memory hole” to avoid how incompetent they were to even think of trying it.

[@natopeacekeeper97]

Thanks Sal for another timely update and analysis.

[@oldstogey7864]

The recent commemorations of D-Day made much of the Mulberry floating harbours, and how they were set up in a day or two, and handled thousands of tons of supplies daily to keep the allied forces supplied. That was in the English Channel, not the (relatively) calm Mediterranean. Have we just lost the ability to do that?

[@dongiovanni4331]

The mulberries were prefabricated in the UK, and hauled over the Channel. As to the sea state of the Channel, one of the Mulberries was destroyed by a storm a few weeks after it was set up.

[@WALTERBROADDUS]

That requires a lot more money and infrastructure.

[@Onequietvoice]

@@dongiovanni4331 Still shows what can be done when there is a genuine will to do something.

[@johnmay23]

@@dongiovanni4331 CORRE THE U.S. PIER BROKE UP !

[@shannonm.townsend1232]

No

[@465maltbie]

Great video, thanks for sharing and giving us the explanation. Charles

[@susanpetropoulos1039]

Wonder which political family partnered with the contractor providing pier materials.

[@maverickmyrtlebeach]

oow oow pick me !

[@obsidianjane4413]

Considering they are probably older than you are, none.

[@jeffhetschel3035]

“This has been a learning experience and we consider it a great success”

[@bioman1300]

Your restraint in not yelling out "I told you so dummies! ' was remarkable !

[@Shipspotting_Vietnam]

Great talk!!!❤❤❤❤🎉

[@stevecrombie5357]

One can see why some are calling for the halt of this boondoogle.

[@tigertiger1699]

Tell you what though… ain’t this a fantastic display of the team work, discipline and sheer greatest of you all volunteer military…👍 go the 🦅 🇺🇸

[@scottsmith9334]

I’m prior Amphibious transport Navy. I noticed two things in your excellent video. One, I’ll take this as all other operations as a Training exercise. The second was the Aid coming from the UAE. One could derive a lot of intelligence from this operation. IMHO. 😎🇺🇸👍🏻

[@cxzact9204]

The Emiratis wouldn't be foolish enough to send illicit supplies through that channel, I think. They have plenty of tunnels built by the Egyptians to use for that. But you're right, it's great training but I suspect the outcome of the exercise will be that the military has learned to not use systems in conditions they weren't designed for. Or so I hope.

[@Greenmachine305]

Nobody is learning anything of value here, other than it sucks to be a marine. Even if they did, they sure as hell won't put that knowledge to good use in the future. The whole operation was a PR stunt designed to distract the population from focusing on complicit US involvement in the Gaza incursion.

[@johnland5042]

What a difficult situation. Frustrating for the staff working over there.

[@davegl1236]

There is a repeated misconception about number of tracks before and after 7 Oct. The number before is tracks carrying everything. Building supply, Manufacturing supply, Food... The number post 7 Oct is just humanitarian aid. e.g food and medical supply.

[@Mag_Aoidh]

It was never met to be used on an open coastline but in “protected” waters. This was purely political and meant to gain brownie points, not help. “Hey, look what we’re doing!” You ask anyone who actually put hands on that thing and they will tell you. Thanks Sal!

[@NotSure416]

I think they're not using containers because of transparency. You can hide anything in a container. Less easy on pallets.

[@WALTERBROADDUS]

You don't have any cargo cranes to move containers.

[@stupidburp]

Can’t stack containers high on these vessels. Pallets moved by forklift makes more sense. Especially when the marshaling area is completely full anyways even with the limited throughput achieved and the internal distribution in Gaza is not keeping up.

[@SteamCrane]

14:00 - Your comments reminded me, and I searched and bought the book "Tug Of War", about the author's experiences during WW-II sailing a US fleet tug from the US East Coast, thru Panama, to the South Pacific. Wonderful book that I read many years ago.

[@loladavinci1243]

What a horrible abuse of taxpayer money squandered upon a ‘famine’ that never was.

[@markodeen4105]

I hope some lessons are learned from this fiasco! In addition to the pier issues, I understand what supplies were brought in are sitting in a warehouse lacking the next link in the supply chain. Thanks Sal

[@laurenglass4514]

No one reported on how the tug got there?

[@SteamCrane]

Several reported that it was hoisted aboard.

[@Jim-dr2ec]

If the report says anything other than "politicians shouldn't pick maritime logistics solutions" its a sham.

[@greyjay9202]

Doomed to failure even before it began. Anyone who bothered to ask the weather folks for information about wind, tide, and sea state, would have known not to attempt setting up this pier on that unprotected beachhead. The world watches us embarrass ourselves, and takes note.

[@whya2ndaccount]

It sounded like there were distribution issues once it was ashore too. Little point in piling it up on the beach if it goes nowhere after that.

[@ecossearthur]

Don't promise what you are unable to achieve.....

[@marvinwestern4276]

Remember whose idea it was to begin with. An entire political career has been built on not worrying about the final outcome.

[@ecossearthur]

@@marvinwestern4276 💯 %

[@patrickhepburn2324]

Good job explaining how this works

[@crinklecut3790]

I always thought it was a bad strategy but I’m sad to see it really didn’t work well. Those people are so desperate for aid I was hoping it would help more.

[@markthebuilder9837]

Hamas is a terrorist organization. I would send no aid.

[@ligmasack9038]

Then they should stop starting fights with israel, and violating the Treaties they begged for after starting said fights with Israel; better yet they should GTFO of Israel as they have ZERO CLAIM to it.

[@CawKee]

Thanks Sal for another interesting video 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

[@gernblansten684]

Its the Army. They disassembled the tug, every soldier put a piece in their ruck, then they reassembled at sea.

[@tomrogers9467]

But it then became a large anchor.

[@Ana_Mystik]

Thank you Sam. They are proper taking the piss.

[@dannyjoebrown4611]

Think of all the money they saved by not paying the crews involved hazardous duty pay while sending them into a bonafide war zone! So, we have that going for us.

[@ashtonwilliams7395]

Fr no hazard pay???

[@doomey22a]

Thanks for this analysis, Sal. I’ve been wondering how exactly they were actually handling stuff on the pier. Would be interested to hear your take on what this operation might mean for the sealift command moving forward, given the talk of it being wound down before this deployment?

[@CanalTremocos]

This was a weird mission from the start. Why make an amphibious landing when Egypt could open a border crossing directly into Gaza? Lots of politics. Big international relations. This one could suspect this pier was just a decoy to avoid the Gaza-Egypt crossing becoming a flashpoint and somewhere someone issuing an ultimatum.

[@WALTERBROADDUS]

Does Egypt doesn't want them. And is building a border wall to keep them out.

[@WALTERBROADDUS]

It's not weird at all. This has more to do with politics than Logistics.

[@jonahhekmatyar]

Israel has closed the border and been preventing aid trucks from getting into gaza since before the war even started

[@MM22966]

On the plus side, this is good training. Sal talked a bit about this when it started, but the Army/Navy has not had to do this kind of large-scale over-the-shore supply ops in quite a long time. Good to blow the rust off and figure out corrective actions NOW, with a core of experienced personnel, if this has to be done in the Pacific, etc.

[@michaelkinsey4649]

This is rather less about weather or equipment or ability than it is about politics. Political will would see enough resource - even blockships against the weather! - put into place. BUT the one side can't guarantee safety or accept foreign military ashore, and frankly WANTS to continue the difficulties for it's people. And the other doesn't seem to want to facilitate the use of a proper port eg Ashdod , then onward road distribution.... (And that ignores the central land access and Southern port access from Egypt!) I truly feel sorry for the US Army and Navy here..... professional people - and this is not their fault!! As for Mulberries..... the lesson is that any facility intended for more than a very short (a day or two) term operation requires ENORMOUS planning and support and security - and that means allied political will. Nice update Sal, thanks you.

[@WALTERBROADDUS]

You've already put about $300 million into this. And you wanted to put more infrastructure?

[@Onequietvoice]

@@WALTERBROADDUS How does that compare to the Military aid given to Israel to create this crisis?

[@WALTERBROADDUS]

​@@Onequietvoicethey should be happy they got $1 or pallet one? Hamas brought this on themselves and the people of Gaza. And once they even got the aid, they withhold hold it from the people.

[@keithhigh7773]

Brit here. You are probably right about the political will. All the "heavy lifting" for Mulberries was done in 1942/43/44. All the designs are readily available, and given the time the Gaza pier was in the planning, the concrete caissons could have been fabricated in Cyprus and shipped across. The block ships (gooseberries in Mulberry speak) could have been substituted by more caissons.The Mulberries were designed to handle a much greater rise and fall of tide than 3 feet. Historical note, some concrete caissons are still visible just off the beach in Arromanches, Normandy, France. I live just a few miles from where many caissons were fabricated here on the south coast of England and in this 80th anniversary year of D-Day, we will shortly be erecting a monument commemorating Mulberries and all the people engaged in their manufacture.

[@raquelho4319]

Also, the work of Merchant Marines!

[@johnbrossack3791]

A CF of the first order. I really feel for the US military personnel who are tasked with making this CF work. Kudos to them.

[@martinmdl6879]

It is not efficient ON PURPOSE. A foreign Government who controls the US Government does not want ANY aid in Gaza. This is their remedy.

[@RyTrapp0]

This is honestly worse than I expected, this is ridiculous. Moving PALLETS at a time? Transferring PALLETS multiple times between various vehicles before they touch ground? This is just absurd. "...an investigation is about to be launched into the pier..." - Can't wait to find out who they scapegoat for this one

[@jamesharrod8733]

prime example of the leadership of military and government of usa , not good

[@TheMusicHeals.kjhjhhg]

sorta like Trump letting 5000 taliban terrorists go free to kill our troops?

[@kotori87gaming89]

The biggest issue isn't the quantity of aid, but the effective distribution of aid. A lot of it gets intercepted by less-needy, more organized groups before it reaches those who most need it. Throwing *more* food at the problem right now will not get any more food to those who actually need it. Ultimately, Gaza needs a functional government again.

[@SpringIsBACK]

Exactly correct. Geez, at least one other person on this thread is sensible. Granted that coming up with a functional gov't in Gaza that is not a threat to the Israelis is a toughie, as the Gazans are indoctrinated from birth to hate Israelis.

[@cathiwim]

Biggest boondoggle of the decade! How much of the aid went to Hamas?

[@elijahcraig4804]

I think I remember a guy saying this wouldn't work immediately after it was announced.

[@markseaman4750]

Whatever the decision, it will be based on optics and political considerations. Never mind if it works or not.

[@MetalheadSailor]

As someone who sailed on one of the Montford Point class ships and participated in side by side exercises with the LMSRs, this pier definitely was a waste.

[@snowness110]

Is anyone reporting on the mortar and rocket attacks on the pier?

[@donaldmarwitz2046]

Thanka was a good story, and showing what all us beibg done.

[@pat36a]

Will this affect Joes new job data? 350 million wasted, can't even use it as a training exercises, unless it's to show what "Not" to do.

[@meli66ajg]

Thanks for covering this--seems like a debacle!

[@GamePerson-w3e]

seems that the whole thing was a pr stunt after all, that or we can't figure out aid, but then the arms are still moving well enough

[@AtomicBuffalo]

When the destination nation wants the arms and not the aid...

[@Onequietvoice]

@@AtomicBuffalo The destination was Gaza.

[@Hybris51129]

@@Onequietvoice Correct that said however what food does come in does go their fighting forces first as is customary in this part of the world. Another example of us supplying our own enemies with war material.

[@AtomicBuffalo]

@@Onequietvoice If Gaza was a nation we wouldn't still be dancing around a two-state solution.

[@wcgcapone]

@@AtomicBuffalo Jordan is the two state solution.

[@edwardmartinez9835]

Sal, look for Gaza Pier at a Gov' Planet Sale near you. Great Video!

[@jonathanbush6197]

So whose brilliant idea was this?

[@WALTERBROADDUS]

West Wing of the White House.

[@TheMajorActual]

I am completely speechless. My God. What an abject disaster.

[@MrRainrunner]

The ONLY reason I can think of for break bulk vs containers is security. Easier for dogs to check everything for bombs?

[@rickc4317]

yes, I had the same thought

[@WALTERBROADDUS]

You are taking stuff off ship. Not putting it on?

[@DrewNorthup]

​@@WALTERBROADDUS Irrelevant. This is humanitarian aid, not military materiel.

[@DrewNorthup]

Mr Rain It is a requirement set out years ago by Israel. They then turn back an entire container-worth / truckload at a time for any reason whatsoever, in violation of the relevant Geneva Conventions, when a single pallet is deemed "out of order". The USA could force them to back down but is unwilling to challenge Benjamin Netanyahu on the matter.

[@WALTERBROADDUS]

@@DrewNorthup Apparently, those in charge don't agree.

[@mark1sown]

Thanks for sharing 😊 great job on the direction of the USA❤

[@silentron1748]

This operation is on the same level of incompetence as Jimmy Carter’s aborted attempt at hostage rescue he tried using helicopters during a sand storm.

[@wildcolonialman]

Fascinating.

[@olpaint71]

This whole thing was a fool's errand. If we (the US) were going to "do something," then we should not take half-measures to try to look good politically. Want to run a JLOTS mission? Great, send over a MEU/ARG, establish a beachhead (with CG/DDGs parked offshore and B-52/B-1 support on-call for force protection), send the Army/Marines/Seabees necessary to support the pier and the transload area, crank up the MLPs to do the job they were designed for, and move some serious tonnage. If we didn't think the mission was worth the potential risk to our "boots on the ground," then we should stay home. This kind of half-measure nonsense is idiotic. And is what brings us things like Mogadishu/Black Hawk Down. Act. Or don't act. Have the fortitude to make a decision and follow through.

[@jedclampett7705]

$230,000,000 that we don’t even have…to pour down someone else’s drain. What happened to this once great country? Unreal.