When You’re Too Drunk to Realize You Almost Hit Kamala Harris Head-On | OFFICE BLOKES REACT!!

[@ayejay5603]

Wayne blowing a 0.25 lol… I passed. Wayne driving on the wrong side of the road thinking why the hell are all these people driving on the wrong side?!

[@MrYabber]

Wayne Wacker huh? 😂😂 his parent should be in jail for that name.

[@36iRealisedImOldToday]

Everyone used to drink and drive back in the day, but now there are just too many cars on the road.

[@anyexpat]

Its not that long ago either, in the 90s loads of people would have 4, 5, 6 pints and drive and no one cared

[@36iRealisedImOldToday]

@@anyexpat Yeah I remember my dad letting me use the wheel and he'd do the rest, it was just normal. Sometimes he would go "you do the gears" and it would probably get him arrested today. Like the people go on about Madeline McCann, EVERY parent used to leave their kids in the hotel room while they went to drink at the bar. Only now do people go "I'd never leave my kids" and claim they're holier than thou. However when my parents split up I was left at home all the time while my mum worked. What else was she meant to do? Now everyone goes on benefits lol.

[@MannyBrum]

Between 1982 (when the statistics on drunk driving started being tracked) and 2018, the rate of drunk driving fatalities per 100,000 people declined 65%. It has nothing to do with too many cars on the road, people were dying far more often, it's just that the laws were loose and people really didn't put the same stigma on drunk driving. In fact, even if you don't adjust for the population increase (which was only 70% in 1982 of what it was in 2018) the drunk driving fatalities still dropped by half. So with 30% more population, we had half as many drunk driving fatalities. Nothing whatsoever to do with number of cars. We just see it more now because of social media.

[@anyexpat]

@@MannyBrum If people were drink driving as they were 30/40 years ago there would be an insane number of accidents

[@josephcoleman6756]

​@MannyBrum How many people were actually wearing seat belts back then?

[@StackRunItUp]

Average Wednesday in Wisconsin

[@wesleywright6458]

If I was one of those cops, I'd have been nervous having random conversation around the secret service officers.

[@JMcKey21]

Daz, It's not really about rank, it's more about jurisdiction. The FBI and Secret Service are Federal and could ask local police to not interfere with their investigation--basically meaning they could take over an investigation. Usually this isn't the case as local police and state are eager to ask for the assistance and resources of federal agencies. CIA, however, do not have jurisdiction within the US. They are only authorized to operate outside of the US in foreign affairs. They do help with identifying threats that could become something like domestic terrorism but then it is handed off to the FBI who have jurisdiction within the US. Edit: yes, of course, the FBI would only take over an investigation if it were under their jurisdiction or asked to by local law enforcement. Jesus Christ.

[@SpicyGherkin69]

The Supreme Court ruled a while back that’s local authorities cant be asked to step aside unless it’s terrorism, hostage situation that are considered national security or things of that nature that locals would usually out source to the feds anyway

[@SpicyGherkin69]

They usually step aside cause of the difference in asset’s and available man powers

[@rayrayber_]

Not technically true

[@scotthill1600]

It’s gets even more complicated when you take into account all the local & state police agencies as well

[@scottbmedic]

I don’t know what planet you live on or what country but per the United States Constitution the highest law of the land the highest law enforcement official in the county they are elected in is the county sheriff who they are over every other law enforcement in the county the incident occurs in including state and local city or town and especially over Federal who has the least authority especially when it’s not in Federal owned property. Look it up for yourselves not an opinion or interpretation but read the actual constitution for yourselves. Yes the secret service does have a right to conduct an investigation because it involves someone they’re protecting but they are not in charge

[@place_there9104]

Police in the US go through the whole business of field sobriety tests more as a legal cover rather than to assess if someone is drunk or not. They know within seconds for the most part if someone is under the influence of something or other, but have to make sure all the legal bases are covered if the case is ever challenged in court. They'll go through the entire procedure unless the subject is completely falling down and unable to take any of the tests. Due to the nature of this incident, it's a given that everyone from the shift supervisor, up the chain of command to the police chief, plus the local political bosses, will be looking at what happened and what officers did. Following the book is the best way to cover everyone in that chain.

[@larryprice5658]

All of the talking to the driver was to gather evidence for a court of law.

[@flogg8635]

With the name of Wacker, you’re either a world renowned hit man or a loser.

[@bradjohnson1578]

Boy just came from a gay bar so I'm thinking loser

[@strider9184]

Or a world renowned professional at wacking it

[@lazyblazer]

14:00 You can't really "rank" most departments against each other. The FBI, CIA, USSS, DHS, etc. are completely different agencies with completely different modes of authority, jurisdiction, purposes. Generally the FBI would respond to things like domestic terrorism, Bank robberies, hostage situations, advanced forensic analysis. They have the power to arrest and charge American citizens with Federal crimes. The CIA almost exclusively deals with threats from abroad. They are our primary intelligence agency that collects intel/data of foreign intelligence/threats. They have no power to arrest American citizens domestically. The USSS mainly focuses on protection of President and other high level government. They also combat financial/counterfeiting/money laundering as well as cyber crimes. There are more agencies and most are very compartmentalized there usually isn't a whole bunch of overlap between federal agencies.

[@Kevyc601]

I was rooting for him on the field sobriety test. Always gotta cheer for the under dog.

[@JeremiahHildebrandt]

@11:57 uh oh @16:38 Did the secret service guys dirty.😂 Soft hands.😂

[@hrussell9677]

He probably lost his job with the public schools. A felony arrest and conviction usually results in a job loss, especially in a public school system. It is part of the code of contact in teacher contracts and results in automatic termination.

[@Nora915]

Wanted you guys to react to this one! It’s pretty crazy how the whole thing played out. Some pretty funny characters here. Glad everyone was safe

[@UNDIAGNOSED7]

GOOD ONE AS ALWAYS GUYS cHEERS!

[@MoodyMarco-vj3oe]

Can someone tell me why in the US they don't just go straight to a breathalyser?

[@emobx02]

I don't mean to give a non-helpful answer, but it would really depend on each state's specific laws, which you think would only be about 50 possible different procedures, but it can also vary between jurisdictions within states.

[@emobx02]

Ultimately Due Process is a big concern, as a breathalyzer is tantamount to search. You wouldn't want a drunk driver to get away with something in court because an officer messed something up procedurally (which does happen). Again, I realize this is a vague answer but it all just depends.

[@thatbaileychic77]

This field sobriety test is a waste of time.

[@TattleDelta]

Yes but you have to at least attempt protocol, for the below.

[@LancerX916]

No it's to gather evidence for court, and it is needed for probable cause. A case can be thrown out if they don't attempt to do them.

[@Fattyyyyx]

it's for gather evidence.

[@willvr4]

Idk about Wisconsin, but in NYC it's pretty common to accidentally drive on the opposite side of the road on a one-way street haha. I've done it myself. It's so annoying and embarrassing since I'm not from the city. I literally saw someone do it 2 days ago.

[@scotthill1600]

NYC is a whole different ballpark especially compared to Wisconsin lmao

[@morbvsclz]

Why even bother with field sobriety tests when he can hardly stand up without resting against something?! It's like seeing a burning building and testing if it's warm when you get close...

[@ESUSAMEX]

The car has Wisconsin plates

[@kinjiru731]

Federal agents of any kind have extensive authority though not absolute authority. That said, it's rare that any local law enforcement can step up in front of the Secret Service. In a protection situation like this, local authorities are obligated to assist the Secret Service and in these situations their authority does exceed local and state.

[@kevinprzy4539]

I think you got that confused Daz (or maybe I am) I heard that people use the same initials when it comes to making up an identity like " Frank Pierce" is more likely to make a bs identity like "Frederick Payne"

[@icycold9406]

The 2nd secret service looks like a singer, I forget his name though

[@oldcodger4371]

Yea the SS agents already knew the guy had no ill intentions as soon as he knew Wayne was drunk. Still, he had to file a report. Just standard procedure.

[@MannyBrum]

Did the cop really ask him if the vikings were a band? Did he not see the dates on the shirt? I don't think any bands were touring in the first millennium AD.

[@willvr4]

"an open MILLER LIGHT beer can was clearly visible" Worst product placement ever.

[@jerzeyguy71]

I am surprised that the SS took that long to have someone there?? shouldn't one car have pulled off the caravan to investigate right away? I will say those were pretty stupid questions the SS had to ask him.. even sober, would anyone actually say the truth?

[@user-wr9ej6xe4j]

It's not about the actual answer. It's HOW they answer them. If he starts stuttering when they ask if he's affiliated with any of those groups, or any of those questions, it's a tell sign. The fact that he laughed at the questions saved him in a sense

[@aphaph695]

Hey everyone! I really enjoyed this video but I haven’t watched in a really really long time. What happened to the other guy who used to react with them?

[@dariusowens1060]

Wait how does he have a beer and no Id 😂

[@kimnapier8387]

Poor guy!! Somebody should have taken his keys! Horrible idea to drive in that state.

[@rmk2336]

Poor guy, my butt. He's old enough to know better not to drink and drive, but he did it anyway.

[@DavidLooes-zp9mr]

Secret Service has jurisdiction over local law enforcement when involving the president and VP and their families. They rarely have problems and usually work together. One of few cases of disagreement was the JFK assasination. He was killed in Dallas and by Texas law he had to be autopsied in there. But the secret service wanted him brought back to Washington immeadiately and he was.

[@oldcodger4371]

That's because the three letter agencies were in on it. That's why they couldn't allow Dallas to do the autopsy.

[@stephaniemccarthy1676]

Dont drink and drive. The outcome may become one of the worst nightmares of your life. Or....you can get driving without killing any one,😣. But, the feds may now have your number. This guy definitely f ed up😟

[@clinthowe7629]

Oh yeah, sure! like he’s going to admit to being “motivated by extremism groups” what a stupid thing to ask, it’s obvious he’s drunk, all they have to do is test his blood alcohol level. I understand the secret service has to rule that out first, but geez!

[@scottgraney5275]

The secret service has control over the situation but since its inception Wisconsin the state police have to control there state.

[@hobbgreen4529]

you can get drunk on miller lite ?

[@dariusowens1060]

You can get drunk on anything if you drink over your tolerance

[@hobbgreen4529]

@@dariusowens1060 it was a joke because miller lite sucks .

[@elkysempire4083]

i didn't like the men in suits they came off rude to the drunk guy smh why not act like the men in blue and treat him with respect

[@devinjenkins4752]

14:00 Secret service has authority above all other law enforcement agencies no matter the jurisdiction. If the SS is involved, everyone is below them. No ifs and or buts. Those the big boys.

[@lazyblazer]

True, but the USSS has a very narrow scope of operation. So in the huge majority of high level crime situations the USSS is not involved.

[@ABeautfulMess]

I think it's best if I say nothing at all or I'll be banned..

[@Grigsy]

The Secret service doesn't have the highest rank. It is about jurisdiction. All law enforcement is equal; each have a different jurisdiction and purpose. When it comes to Protection of the president/VP/candidates & counterfeiting of money, the Secret Service have jurisdiction. When there are crimes committed on Federal land, or involve 2 or more states, the FBI have jurisdiction. CIA has no law enforcement powers. DHS has power over the borders. The EPA has environmental law enforcement powers to arrest and investigate. there are a handful of other agencies that also have federal law enforcement powers. Each agency has full autonomy and makes policies for their jurisdiction. Congress established them and the President (executive branch) runs them. Local police vs county / state police also serve slightly different functions. in generally local police do most of the local policing and state police exist to oversee/audit the police and handle complex cases or conflict of interests.

[@dariusowens1060]

What about Texas rangers? I’m curious

[@dmatech]

The US Secret Service can't command the state/local officers, but they're all going to work together anyway because they're all ultimately Americans just trying to uphold the law and keep people safe.

[@todtiger]

He`s as pissed as harris usually is.

[@michaelledbetter4776]

She’s drunk 24/7 so I’m sure she understands. Unburdened by what has been.

[@blakerh]

Thank God that dummie lost!

[@wadecollins907]

leave it to Maga to say something stupid. If that's the case Then tell me what Trump is on. Cause if he would say anything coherent it would be nice change of pace. That is when he is not tweeting on the toilet at 3 in the morning

[@quasicrystal5166]

@@wadecollins907 Cope harder.

[@GBrimstone]

​@@quasicrystal5166 unnecessary

[@user-wr9ej6xe4j]

@@wadecollins907 Neither of them are "on" anything. She's just dumb as a box of rocks and Trump has a bloated ego. At least Trump cares about actual policies for the country and securing citizens safety. Not about protecting criminals and people who came here illegally

[@chanzig1138]

Oh no, not Kamala 🙄😂

[@quasicrystal5166]

Guaranteed Kackala was drunker than old Wayne Wacker.

[@velmaclario148]

Maybe but at least she wasn't driving 😂

[@Bozemanjustin]

Wait so this guy was too drunk to know that he was almost a national hero, an international hero, a savior of the world

[@GBrimstone]

How was he almost a national hero?