2-hander: easier to learn to master faster. Easier to deal with high balls. Easier to aggressively return serves. 1-hander: easier to hit from various distances to the ball. Easier to hide slices, various change-up shots, & disguise directional changes. Tends to transition to players with better net games.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
euroclyde you got it, we’ll summarized! Thanks for sharing. 🤙🏼
@DanTuber5 жыл бұрын
2HBH does not feel easy if you've done 1HBH all your life. It just feels very restrictive.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
DanTuber it’s definitely difficult to change from a OHB to two and vice versa. It’s all personal preference. Restrictive is a good description, hear it all the time when a student is trying to transition between strokes.
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
I would suggest one more thing. I think the one-hander takes more courage to hit well. It takes total commitment to hit a good one-handed topspin backhand. Get tight, and it's over. The two-hander was always the shot I knew I wasn't going to miss, always the shot I was hoping some fool would serve at or hit the approach to (most of em did.) That extra hand on the racket made a difference.
@MyChevySonic5 жыл бұрын
I agree with pretty much everything. The two hander is like sword and shield. The one hander is like dual wielding.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Bits of Pulp lol....fair enough. Thanks for watching!
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
The guy with the shield will live longer.
@mwest35833 жыл бұрын
@@charlesforee7082 lol
@rexknowsless31873 жыл бұрын
@@charlesforee7082 and the guy dual wielding will kill everyone else before they have the chance to kill him
@SlashsBluesBall2 жыл бұрын
@@charlesforee7082 true
@mementomori98442 жыл бұрын
as a girl with a ohb, i think it's pretty safe to say i prefer it a lot more. i had a *really* clean two hander growing up, and i'm still a teenager but the one hander just feels a lot more fluid and easier to hit. i don't see many women using one handers anymore, save for i think steffi graf and martina navratilova? there's probably more, but those are the only two i can remember. i think a one hander would really benefit a lot of players, and it definitely helps with playing at the net too. it's also a lot easier to switch to slices and get to tough shots. with a two hander, though it was one of my cleanest shots, it felt like i was restricted in terms of movement. i had to rotate fully, while with a one hander, it's nice to be able to end up in that federer-esque pose and feel stretched out and fluid. those are just my two cents though, and i'm still a teen, but i definitely prefer the one handed. edit: grammar
@Playyourcourt2 жыл бұрын
Greatest feedback! You are spot on with the improved versatility with the one-hander. The one-handed backhand definitely makes sliceing the ball and net play much easier. Love to hear your're utilizing the OHB. Be sure to checkout footage of Justine Henin. One of the best one handers on tour, men & women! Thanks for watching and best of luck with your game!
@cudderlover12165 жыл бұрын
Stan the Man is way stronger with high backhands ball than Federer
@verlatenwolf5 жыл бұрын
Shapovalovs jumping backhand is the most awesome shot though.
@cudderlover12165 жыл бұрын
@@verlatenwolf it really is!!! It's unreal athleticism and timing
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Michael Delgado agreed. Thanks for watching!
@lkfhjto5 жыл бұрын
Agreed, Stan got the best 1hbh in tour.
@Callumliuu5 жыл бұрын
Growing up with a 2hbh, sometimes I feel like I'm jammed up swinging the racquet and not getting all the power I can generate, but after switching to a 1hbh I feel I can generate a hell of a lot more power, but I have to practice more footwork to get myself way behind the ball and strike it cleaner to achieve the power and control
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Callie Thiensri the “jammed” feeling is where most players convert over to the OHB. The one hander certainly fixes this problem. Solid insights, thanks for sharing!
@FirestarG15 жыл бұрын
I one hundred percent agree same situation for me
@radreviewz94825 жыл бұрын
I just switched because I was sick of feeling jammed, like my backhand had less reach. That jammed feeling can hold back power and dexterity/reach as well. Many little cons that make it a difficult shot for different reasons.
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
@@FirestarG1 I'd have paid good money to see you with Nalbandian's backhand.
@wilsoch4 жыл бұрын
@@Playyourcourt Thanks for sharing that. I hit both backhands -- the two hander most of the time, but I use the one hander sometimes (low balls in particular). I hate the "jammed" feeling I get on the two hander sometimes, but I've never known how to correct it. I'd love a video on that!
@hochiglenn3 жыл бұрын
I’ve always felt constricted with 2 hands and that I couldn’t generate power. One handed just feels so much more natural. I think our bodies are wired a certain way to feel more comfortable with either a one or two hand BH.
@Playyourcourt3 жыл бұрын
Only took me 33 years to figure out the exact same thing Glenn. RIP two-hander. Thanks for watching!
@kcazzzzz2 жыл бұрын
probably because you are not chaining your body rotation in your shots. 1 handers get their power from unrestricted swings. but for 2 hander, players can actually rotate the body more, so thats where they get their power. there are advantages and disadvantages for both, but the advantages of 2 handers outweighs the advantages of 1 handers, thats why it is dominant among the pros. the main advantage for 2 handers is stability, and you will need that especially during big serves and big groundstrokes. that alone outweighs all the advantages of 1 handers combined. another advantage is that you can contact later, and it is easier for a 2 hander to receive higher or lower balls because of that extra hand on the racket. the main advantages of 1 handers is that it has better reach, and easier to disguise a slice. in terms of which one has more power, it is up to the player's technique and physique really
@hochiglenn2 жыл бұрын
@@kcazzzzz oh yeah. I’m aware of all these facts. For me, it’s super awkward and clumsy to use 2 hands not to mention absolutely no power generated. The players in my area are impressed with my 1HB backhand variety and power and generally tell people to play to my FH and stay away from BH.
@tritone112 жыл бұрын
Same here
@cleanplasticchild5 жыл бұрын
Excuse me? What two players are playing for the championship in the 2019 ATP World Tour Finals?
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
cleanplasticchild yup, some big hitting one handers. Was a heck of a match. Can’t forget Novak and Rafa’s Two-hander backhands though. The’ve been on top of the game for too long to brush them aside. A loooot of one handers at the tour finals though. Maybe a sign of what’s to come?
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
Two guys who have yet to win a major. And Nadal beat one of those guys--on a fast court with very little bounce to it. Hard to attack the other guy up high if you can't get the bounce up there without sacrificing airspeed. (You'd be forgiven for thinking the surface was intentionally set to be Federer-friendly. I half expect the clay in Madrid and Barcelona to be a bit slower and redder next season, just to even things out.) :-)
@codynelson48685 жыл бұрын
Who won slams this year though 😂
@rafaeldeleo925 жыл бұрын
World number 1 since 2010 are players the two hand backhand.....
@vlesmeries2 жыл бұрын
I went from one handed to two handed to save my arm and shoulder due to a persistent right rotator cuff injury. I only have so many serves and topspin 1bh shots in me before my body broke down. It was super tough but after many ball machine sessions it’s solid now. I think I lost a little bit of power but gained even more consistency and accuracy going to 2bh. Excellent video.
@Playyourcourt2 жыл бұрын
Glad to hear transitioning to a two-hander is going well! Definitely way less strian on the dominant arm. Thanks for watching!
@yueli21465 жыл бұрын
Hitting a silky smooth one handed backhand winner is the biggest joy I'll ever have in tennis and no one can take that away from me. Yes it is a tougher shot and I'm not a professional player so I really don't care about winning that much. It's just so much more fun to hit.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Yue Li and sometimes that’s all the matters. Keep ripping those one handers!
@10scoach335 жыл бұрын
IMO, it all depends on what type of player and what type of playing style you want to play!!! If your a grinding baseliner like an Andy Murray/Novak Djok, who generally stays back and grinds out points, a 2hbh is maybe more suitable!! If you want to play more of a transition game and an all court attacking player, the 1hbh is a little more versatile, ie, being able to play the slice and dice approach to get to net, ala Roger Federer /Pete Sampras....... both have as many Cons and Pros, whatever comes more natural to the player is the one you should go with, IMO
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
10S Coach we completely agree, it simply comes down to personal preference. Thanks for the feedback.
@radreviewz94825 жыл бұрын
I'll say this, as someone who has switched to a OHBH, a lot of the cons are completely misrepresented and misunderstood. Mostly because many players talk out of thier youknowwhat but also most players don't have any notable experience with it. The grip you go with will heavily influence the kind of shots you will prefer. I have developed a more western/wawrinka style grip and holy cow can you get power and dexterity like crazy. Your footwork does have to be a little cleaner for sure but that isn't a bad thing! I can go on and on but I think the main reason the western style grip is so powerful is because it allows you to engage your tricep more, which is the strongest muscle in the arm. Can't do that with a forehand! Pros and cons. Most people focus on the negative and don't get through it to appreciate the obvious benefits you will see for yourself once you get to a certain level of comfort with it. I will probably never go back. Was a 2 hander for like...10 years! I play at a 4.5-5 level. Came surprisingly natural to me. High backhands were actually one of the reasons I switched. It is so much easier to get up on a high ball with one fully extended arm than 2 awkwardly extended ones. To each their own. Many one handers and 2 handers have claimed thier spot as best in the world at different eras of tennis. Don't let conventional knowledge influence you too much.
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
I can hit both (anyone can if they want to learn), and my own experience as well as what I've seen tells me that many of the pros are also misrepresented. Some apply only to the slice, which is an easy shot unless you want to do something stupid like trying to hit a lot of winners with it. The drives are much more similar, as you need contact out front with leverage with either one. If the effectiveness of one or the other was vastly different or even particularly significant, you wouldn't be seeing the weaker one. I love seeing both styles out there.
@christianmilon23113 жыл бұрын
Totally agree with strong eastern grip (towards western). In times past grip for 1hander was modified eastern (towards continental) with this grip it was difficult or even impossible to add spin to the ball. Gasquet, thiem, wavrinka develop huge power and spin through the strong eastern grip. It’s almost 2 different swings and shots. It’s also easier to hit a 1hbh with a strong eastern grip, your wrist is steady and you can unleash big times. A lot of people struggle with their 1hbh because of the grip. I did. And now My 1h is getting better and better.
@meahall5 жыл бұрын
I've grown up playing with a one-handed backhand, and there definitely are advantages like how you can definitely hit a one handed backhand a lot faster, and one handed players tend to have better slices (although I generally put it down to the fact that they have to play more slices than a two-handed player). But despite that, I would not recommend anyone learns a one-hander. It's a more complicated shot that isn't really suited to the way tennis is played today, and I definitely think I would have won more matches, had I played a two-hander.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Mícheál solid insights, much appreciated!
@meahall5 жыл бұрын
@@Playyourcourt Thanks!
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
And there is no excuse for a two-hander not to develop a one-handed slice. If guys playing two-handed at the pro level didn't have serviceable slices you wouldn't be seeing them on tv. If they're not emphasizing them it's because they don't need to.
@midget4202 жыл бұрын
I use one hand for slice and two hands for backhand.
@midget4202 жыл бұрын
@@charlesforee7082 Imo one handed backhand slice is the easiest shot of all tennis.
@rodivxc5 жыл бұрын
Why do we have to choose? I'm right-hand-dominant but played baseball as a lefty-hitter. I grew up with the one-handed backhand in tennis because I was a little too strong with my two-handed stroke. Now that I'm playing competitive tennis (just at a 3.0-3.5 level now) I've learned to control the power of a top-spin two-hander or defensive high ball when I can set one up but still enjoy a one-hander wicked slice or a deadly drop shot. At my level, I usually have time to decide which to hit.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Rod Ramirez your referencing a one-hander on the slice and yes your absolutely right. Every two hander typically has a one-handed slice. (Unless you’re Jimmy Connors) It’s a necessity in order to defend balls out of reach. This was merely a debate when discussing topspin and drives. Thanks for the feedback, much appreciated!
@exar83555 жыл бұрын
ATP Tour Finals 2019 semis = Federer, Thiem, Tsiptasis, Zverev. French Open final 2019 = Nadal and Thiem. Not saying one is better than the other but shows the one handed can cut it on fast and slow. It's all about skill.
@Greenfield-yf1wh3 жыл бұрын
Only 2 out of 8 winners & runner-ups of 2019 Grand Slam were OHBH. Thiem would not have won the US open in 2020 if It wasn't for the pandemic. So yeah...it doesn't look so good for OHBH, despite of talented players like Tsitsipas and Shapovalov
@ciaranbrady25922 жыл бұрын
I played 2 handed for over 10 years but it was letting me down more and more in competitive matches. I switched to single handed a year ago and have never looked back. I agree the return is a lot easier with 2 hands on the racket but for me the one hander is better for everything else.
@jbolanowski15 жыл бұрын
5. Fun fact: Djokovic tried one-hander as a kid (his idol was Sampras- would You believe it) but lacked the power. Wawrinka on the other hand (pun intended) had a 2hander :). I don't think either of them regrets the switch :P. So I guess my answer to the question in your video is: it depends...
@TannnerFreak25 жыл бұрын
I have a one handed back hand and that's how I started. I always tried to got to a 2 hander, but I just couldn't do it. I don't play very competitively so it's not really a problem either way. The one handed backhand is just so much fun. To me a one handed backhand is the most natural and the most comfortable. The only the only thing I can think of is that I have a long history of ping pong playing and when I started playing tennis I tried to transition ad much of that knowledge as possible. It might not have been the best thing to do, but hey....I never had a coach or anyone teach me.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Salad Boi it’s all personal preference and if you enjoy hitting the one hander you should certainly stay with it. I can see how transitioning from ping pong would influence your game. Thanks for watching and keep ripping those one handed backhands!
@NamesAreRandom3 жыл бұрын
Most 1-handers I know basically slice 95% of the time, I think you have to be really good to make the 1-hander work reliably. For topspin the 1-hander is just a lower % shot then the 2-hander, and under pressure more likely to break down which means it's main benefit (you can slice easily) becomes a crutch (all you do is slice).
@Playyourcourt3 жыл бұрын
This is certainly true at some levels but as a player improves coming over the ball is imperative. The slice is definitely more of a resource for one -handers on the return of serve and for balls that stretch them to the outer thirds of the court than for those with a two-handed backhand.Thanks for the feedback and for watching!
@boarini20035 жыл бұрын
The one hander will always be more beautiful but switching to the two hander was the best decision ever made for my game.
@fingersm5 жыл бұрын
Jonathan same here!! Improved my game 30%
@bugraguner Жыл бұрын
I am thinking to switch too. It’s struggle for me. But with two hand I can’t generate power
@icefalcon2243 Жыл бұрын
I played a two handed backhand (from watching Agassi) from 10 until I was about 25. (I definitely changed because of Federer). Now when I try a two hander it feels SO wild but I still want to hit it clean. I’m glad I switched but it does cost me some power at times.
@karlroszko5 жыл бұрын
Back in ancient times I played high level junior tennis in Australia and the two handed was not taught to boys, “two handers are for girls” coaches used to say. So when I reached my max height of 5’10 and was playing grass court tournaments against taller kids they would try to attack to my backhand side and returning serve was just about survival. I wanted so badly to learn a two hander as guys like Andre Agassi were coming on and it was starting to be more accepted but it was too late. I had to end a promising career at 16 because of this major weakness in my game that I hated. Fast forward 25 years and my daughter just so happened to want to play tennis and after a year or so I got the itch to play again BUT I was going to ditch the single handed and get coached on a 2 hander. It’s been over a year and thousands and thousands of repetitions but it’s coming natural and I’ll never go back to that single hander. Unless you can absolutely rip it like Thiem, Tsitsipas or Dimitrov then go with 2 hands.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Karl Roszko appreciate the insights. I actually had a similar experience as a young junior but due to a wrist injury I was switched to a THB. Due to the prominence of Connors and Agassi, coaches within our region began to instruct the THB thankfully. Interesting to hear your story being the reverse of what I experienced. The OHB is fun to play with but as you said, due to the return of serves at a high level I won’t be switching anytime soon. Thanks for watching! -Nate
@alanchong75133 ай бұрын
Very interesting story. Feel bad that the single handed backhand let you down. The pro tour is nearly devoid of single handed backhand players now. I don't see a SHB player winning a major again. They just get outhit in a baseline to baseline exchange.
@alanchong75133 ай бұрын
When you were hitting the single handed backhand as a junior, were you hitting slice or topspin? Topspin is at least more offensive. Slice is very defensive. Someone like Edberg was good to watch as he could hit both spins very effectively.
@ericshine15 жыл бұрын
So glad you guys made this video! If you have a one hander, you sometimes wonder if a two hander is better, and vice versa. This is a great resource of information. Thank you!
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Eric Shine glad we could help. Thanks for watching and the feedback! 🤙🏼
@stef44924 жыл бұрын
Two handers will likely always dominate in numbers because as they said "nearly everyone starts with it" at least nowadays. You generally have to "switch" to a one hander. It takes more effort to learn it as well, but if it is learned, in my mind, it is a more natural stroke with a similar feeling of freedom to the forehand side. Running around at high speed with your hands together and then swinging at something on the move is NOT natural and requires exceptional footwork and athleticism at the upper levels. I agree with most pros and cons however and ultimately it comes down to how the player feels or their play style. Great video.
@Playyourcourt4 жыл бұрын
Stefan great insights, thanks for the feedback!
@hankhill27325 жыл бұрын
I like how you’re wearing adidas and Nike shirts, respectively
@djeeee9115 жыл бұрын
New power raquets allows one hand backhand. Wee see that in atp pro. I'am a natural one hand backhand, but i believe the two hande is way more solid
@fingersm5 жыл бұрын
2hbh! Switched over a year ago and kick myself for not trusting my intuition earlier. 2hbh is a game changer Plus Federer said himself that he would teach 2hbh to his kids
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
frank mancuso that he did Frank. Glad you were able to make the switch and your feeling good about the 2hbh. Thanks for the feedback my man.
@Anthony-cr5dh5 жыл бұрын
Here's a question... Why is a two handed forehand not popular if a two handed back hand is so common? I am right handed, but I use my left hand at the bottom of the racquet so I actually play as a 'lefty 2 handed backhand' However, when I try to 'backhand' on my left side of my body it is completely garbage and I have gone to a slice (right handed). I was never 'inspired' by Monica Seles, Su-wei Hsieh and other legends - but they have certainly motivated me to play outside of the box!
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Anthony H there’s been several players that have been successful with the two handed forehand, namely Seles and John Michael Gamble. We have several students in the academy that have found success with it as well. Due to coordination of the dominant arm most prefer to play with one hand giving them better reach and potentially more power. On the non dominant arm the THB is preferred to help with stability. Some players, especially with weaker wrists or other injuries prefer the two handed forehand for the same reasons. And sometimes it’s totally personal preference. Thanks for the question!
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
Annnnd...The modern forehand is the dominant rallying shot in the game--even if your last name is Djokovic. Modern technique allows the player to cover 60-70 percent of the baseline with the forehand, and the inside-out forehand is the most devastating groundstroke in tennis. The two-handed strokes cannot generate the spin necessary to control the kind of pace the one-handed forehand can generate. Not enough room to accelerate the racket head. And of course, less spin means a less-heavy ball and a less-nasty bounce. Hitting two hands on both wings simply trades one primary and one secondary shot for two secondary ones. Not to mention the loss of reach on the forehand side. And the modern forehand is NOT really that difficult to learn, as long as you don't need to hit it with Federer pace or Nadal spin. However, the key is what works best for you. The two-handed forehand can be a great shot for the right player. Heck, Hseih Su-Wei hits two two-handed backhands and can do magic with them.
@SlashsBluesBall2 жыл бұрын
Thanks guys, I was struggling in making my decision on which one I wanna use and this video was SO HELPFUL. Seriously, thanks a lot.
@kcazzzzz2 жыл бұрын
you should go for the 2 handed backhand. 1 am a 1 hander, but i recommend new players to use 2 handed backhands. i remember federer saying the same thing too, that he recommend 2 handed backhands rather than 1 handed backhands. there are advantages and disadvantages for both, but the advantages of 2 handers outweighs the advantages of 1 handers, thats why it is dominant in the atp among all pros, and almost every wta players in the top 100 are using 2 handed backhands. the main advantage for 2 handers is stability, and you will need that especially when returning big serves and big groundstrokes. that alone outweighs all the advantages of 1 handers combined. another advantage is that you can contact later, and it is easier for a 2 hander to receive higher or lower balls because of that extra hand on the racket. on a recreational level the advantage of having 2 hands on the racket is that you won't get injuries to your hand that easily. the main advantages of 1 handers is that it has better reach, and easier to disguise a slice. in terms of which one has more power, it is up to the player's technique and physique really. 1 handers get their power from unrestricted swings. but for 2 hander, players can actually rotate the body more, so thats where they get their power. by combining their swing speed with their body rotation
@SlashsBluesBall2 жыл бұрын
@@kcazzzzz thank you very much, good sir. I think I'm gonna take your advice. I wanna be competitive on the court.
@Playyourcourt2 жыл бұрын
Our pleasure, glad it was helpful!
@xtraxtra1715 жыл бұрын
Neither backhand is better than the other, it depends on the individual.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
kevin shelly agreed, it’s definitely personal preference. Thanks for watching!
@georgekostaras37985 жыл бұрын
If you manage to master the one handed backhand its a lot easier to return the ball. I have played with both and i have actually been more comfortable with the one handed. I was a panhellenic champ and its just what suits you better. There is no better than the other its just what suits the player and is more comfortable with. Great vid though keep it up😁
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
george kostaras well said George. Glad you enjoyed the vid. Thanks for sharing my man.
@danield.73595 жыл бұрын
One handed for sure! Better range, better acceleration, quicker. Finally, better esthetics (especially for men). If the twohander was so good, why it's not being used in table tennis, squash and badminton? Why is the twohander not used on the forehand side too (except for Roland Stadler, late 80s Swiss ATP player)?
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Daniel D. The one hander certainly allows easier acceleration and finesse hence why we don’t see it in those other sports. Those same attributes is why we don’t see more two handers on the forehand. The THB is simply easier at absorbing pace and countering it and that’s why we see it as the dominant choose in tour. Thanks for watching!
@danield.73595 жыл бұрын
@@Playyourcourt I was just kidding. This is the oldest question in Tennis and it never will be resolved. But it's always a good controversial topic to draw tennis folks into a discussion, or, to get more clicks on the web.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Daniel D. Ahhh..gotta love “reading tone” on the internet. It really just comes down to personal preference for each individual player so we agree, no answer will ever be concrete. Fun topic and definitely click baitey!
@lijkn4 жыл бұрын
high level players: doesn't matter. they are already great on what they are doing. beginner: 2hbh is easier. easy to find descent 2 handers among the recreational players, not many descent 1 handers. 1hbh is either very sexy, when they are good at it, or quite ugly. 2hbh is mostly somewhere in the middle.
@RamsesReturns5 жыл бұрын
It depends who is hitting them and how there’re being hit. That said, 3 out of the 4 semifinalists In the ATP 2019 final hit one handed.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
RamsesReturns hard to deny there’s a major resurgence for the OHB!
@RamsesReturns5 жыл бұрын
Yes, but also 3 out of the 4 greats, hit two handed. I honestly think there is a greater risk to reaching your potential hitting one. If you don’t hit it very well, or if it is not taught well, and you don’t make the adjustments for high balls and returns, the two hander is much more reliable.
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
The huge serves and huge forehands had a lot more to do with it.
@RamsesReturns5 жыл бұрын
Charles Foree To a point, but now that Tsitsipas is stepping more forward to make contact, and no longer open and leaning backward as often... these three have extraordinarily good backhands. These are the best one handed backhands in the game. With one exception, and that’s when Wawrinka is on, it’s unstoppable.
@tennistavet5 жыл бұрын
Nadal won vs Tsitsipas....
@tonydang89964 жыл бұрын
The one hander has to be the more powerful shot. Even though you have an extra arm to produce power with the double hander, that mainly helps you accelerate the racket faster. The maximum speed at which you can swing the one handed backhand is definitely faster than the two handed. Most of the big power backhands on the pro tour are one handers: Wawrinka, Gasquet, Shapovalov, ... Djokovic and Nadal have awesome backhands but they’re more about placement and spin, in terms of sheer speed and power it’s not as big.
@Playyourcourt4 жыл бұрын
Tony Dang some solid points, definitely agree that we’re seeing more power from the one handers on tour. At the recreational level not as much but certainly on tour. Thanks for watching and the feedback! -Nate
@mansour66232 жыл бұрын
Consistency in longer rallies is another big advantage of the 2 handed one. I would give up my decent one hander for a two hander.
@farid14064 жыл бұрын
You can also time the One-Hander late if you build up good velocity and learn how to swing with the hips and also how to open your shoulders without opening too much. Take Dominic Thiem for example.
@raphael27845 жыл бұрын
This is the video I just needed, I started to develop my one hander and my two handed is solid.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Rappyb17 glad to hear the instruction helped. Thanks for watching! 🍻
@Matheusfk35 жыл бұрын
I agree. I grew up hitting the thbh and got to the point where I could hit with equal confidence on both sides, could open angles, return serves from inside the court very agressively, spin, use angles, change directions... But then I hurt my left wrist and no matter how many exams I go through, doctors can't come to a diagnose, so I had to switch to the OHBH. I struggled enourmosly on the return of serve. At first I had to get way back like Thiem to then star walking my way inside again. Another problem is the high balls, cause if you are not on the top of your footwork game and get the ball on the rise you kinda get pushed around a lot. So I am missing heavily my THBH ans trying to adapt now, but it's been a tough journey.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Matheus Ferro Kunii sorry to hear about the wrist. Suffered an ECU injury to the non dominant wrist in college and experienced a similar journey. Thankfully it healed. Switching my NDH to a eastern grip instead of a continental grip helped immensely. Thanks for watching and the feedback. Some really good insight!
@tritone112 жыл бұрын
I‘ve got long arms and am relatively explosive by nature, with the 2HBH I feel weirdly limited and with the 1HBH I feel much more powerful.
@Playyourcourt2 жыл бұрын
That's true for a lot of people that are a bit taller / longer limbed. After switching to a one-hander after 30+ years with a two-hander I found the same thing. Thanks for watching!
@jbolanowski15 жыл бұрын
3. Yep! It's all trade-offs. And backhand is not only about backhand. It's about your whole game. I realised it when I changed 2-hander for 1hander and immediatly got better at the net (and worse from the baseline :( ). But don't take it from some random guy like me. Sampras used to have 2hbh as a junior and I read, that it was his fav shot. He changed it for his shitty one-hander in order to be better net player and he discovered that changiing to one-hander immediately made his game more aggresive. I heard that was the reason behind Thiem swithching to one-hander (yep, as a kid he had a 2hander too!). His coach told him that with 2-hander he will waste his talent to become a grinder :). All best shot-makers tend to have 1-handers and all 2-handers seems to specialize in long rallies (basically since introduction of this shot by Connors and Borg). Just think of all the rivalries: Borg-Mcenroe, Sampras-Agassi, Federer-Nadal.
@tonypatricelli84083 жыл бұрын
For the recreational player two hands can be useful on both sides of the ground strokes but not limited to two hands only
@Playyourcourt3 жыл бұрын
Very true Tony!
@chrisf2474 жыл бұрын
Two hands for me for the returns alone. I don't have an issue transitioning to slice because my right hand is already in a continental grip. The biggest problem I have (and you nailed this one) is running up to hit a short ball on the backhand side. It seems like I can never bring my feet around and get set up fast enough to hit it really convincingly.
@Playyourcourt4 жыл бұрын
Hi Chris, thanks for the feedback. We have a video coming out later this month on attacking low balls with the THB. Stay tuned!
@Evie-jq6ty4 жыл бұрын
I’ve always played 2 hands and it’s never worked - tried a one hander today and it just made sense ! making the switch now wish me luck !
@Playyourcourt4 жыл бұрын
Evie wishing you the best of luck Evie. Keep us posted on how it’s progressing! Thanks for watching.
@CaocaoX4 жыл бұрын
I have switched between one hand and two hands back in high school, told by different coaches. My personal experience is the one hand has a lower comfort zone, it needs a longer swing path because the absence of the left hand. But it doesn’t need as much unit turn. So I do find it harder on returning serves but it can reach wide balls easier. At the end I stayed on with one hand so I can mix the drops. And for high balls I find it easier to just rip a flat.
@Playyourcourt4 жыл бұрын
Well said, the return of serve is definitely one of the more difficult aspects of the one-handed backhand. In time with improved footwork I've found I'm coming over the ball more but without a doubt prefer the two hander on returns. Appreciate the feedback!
@mib9107 ай бұрын
2bh is more consistent in my case, and I played 1bh for 3-4 years now and the 2bh maybe for a few weeks
@jbolanowski15 жыл бұрын
Couple of points: 1. Spin - I saw the statistics at Wimbledon 2014 or 15 - top 5 backhands with most avarage RPMs were at thins tournament: Gasquet, Almagro, Federer, Wawrinka, Dimitrov (Gasquet at #1, the rest I'm not sure). All one-handers! All 2400-2800 RPM (Rafa's forehand is 3300, Roger's forehand is 2700 - yes! Roger has more or less as much spin on his backhand as forehand!). These are not exceptions. This is the rule! 2-handers tend to be much more flat. It's much easier/more natural to put lot of spin at 1hbh, Just think about the mechanics and the way You put an extra spin on the ball with your wrist at the end of the stroke. How easier and more natural is to make this windshield wiper motion with one hand. To do it with 2-hander You have to cut on the power much more - so they tend to be flatter. Rafa is great example - he hits it with either spin or power (he does both great of course) wheraes Gasquet or Thiem don't have to compromise.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Jakub Bolanowski great insights, thanks for sharing! 🙏🏻💯🍻
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
Wimbledon is not the place to look for the top end of Rafa's rpms on the forehand. He has to hit much flatter there. And with the exception of Federer, none of those other guys was any threat at all to win the tournament. The guy with the flattish two-handed backhand won it without playing anywhere near his best tennis. That said, you can definitely get more spin one-handed. You're also gonna make more errors doing it, more than likely. Consistency matters. The shorter backswing matters. (Takes a lot of room to swing that topspin one-hander.) Recovery time post-shot matters. Disguise matters. Return of serve really, really matters. Ability to make the shot when you're tired really, really matters. (One-handed players lose their legs--out comes the slice--or out come the errors.) The fact that the forehand is so dominant in modern tennis is the only actually practical reason I can think of for the "resurgence of the one-handed forehand." (That Federer did it and the younger players worshiped him--and still do--is an impractical reason, but the more influential one.) Small differences in effectiveness on the backhand side take a far back seat to how good a guy can hit a forehand--and of course how well he can hit a serve. Even Djokovic's backhand is most useful in setting up his forehand. For guys like us? It doesn't matter. Use what makes you feel good about your game. Understand the stroke, practice it, perfect it, and it will do good service either way.
@jbolanowski15 жыл бұрын
@@charlesforee7082 I don't argue with the most of you're saying here, but those points were already made in the original video. I've added staff that wasn't there. 2 things though: one minor - RPM numbers for backhand I took from Wimbledon but the one regarding Rafa's and Roger's forehand I read somewhere else and I tnink they were avarage across the surfaces - but that's to be check.
@jbolanowski15 жыл бұрын
@@charlesforee7082 Major point however is this: one-handed backhand is abolutely not (only) esthetic choice! And it's not only because of Roger that we have it around. Unlike S&V it doesn't seem it's going the Dodo way, although I've been reading about it's death since 2013: www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/tennis/wimbledon/10156337/Wimbledon-2013-the-single-handed-backhander-is-in-danger-of-becoming-extinct.html I would think that Wawrinka successes and last ATP final would prove it already,
@jbolanowski15 жыл бұрын
for Thiem and for Stan it was concious (and I would say succesful) choice to switch to one-hander precisely because it gave them advantage (btw Thiem's fav. player and idol growing up was Rafa not Roger)
@hrishikeshshenoy88934 жыл бұрын
I have consistent two hander with power and spin, but my one hander is really good if I get it in but isn’t as consistent. Which one would you recommend?
@Playyourcourt4 жыл бұрын
Hi Hrishikesh, that's really tough to say without seeing you play but I would lean towards the two-hander. Consistency is key. If it's already steady, I would just put focus on refining targeting and improving it as a weapon. As they say "if it's not broke..don't fix it" 😉. Thanks for watching, hope this helps!
@ferr19095 жыл бұрын
I agree, the 2 hander is better but the 1 hander is way cooler.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Fernando Rodriguez it’s definitely sweet looking when hit well. Theim’s backhand lately....💣🔥⚡️
@miguelvegav4 жыл бұрын
Sampras’ one-handed backhand was very weak
@tonylall76495 жыл бұрын
As a low level player with a one handed backhand I pretty much agree that the two handed backhand is a more advantageous stroke to have. The only benefit to a one hander is it's game style lends itself more naturally to a player who likes to come into net and I'm terrible at volleys. Like the guys say, the one hander requires better timing and a longer backswing so you have to make more space for the shot, whereas the two hander is just a better utility shot and can be hit from practically anywhere with just body rotation if needs be. Too late for me now but I wish I had a two hander.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Tony Lall it’s never too late to improve. Maybe you won’t have a THB but the one hander is the Swiss army knife of tennis and there’s plenty of time to improve other aspects such as the slice and volleys that coincide with the one hander. Thanks for the insights and for watching! 🍻
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
Too late??? I went from a Connors forehand to a Wegner forehand when I was 40. A HUGE improvement. I went from the Wegner forehand to ATP style at 53 (Not a difficult transition.) Another huge improvement. Still hitting it three heart attacks and one open-heart surgery later at 58. Still hitting the two-hander, but had to go from Connors-style to Wegner style at 53, to a more modern one starting two years ago at 56. (Had to learn the drop because the knees aren't what they used to be.) Learned the one-handed slice in my fifties. (Knees again.) You'd be astonished at what you can do with your game if you go about it the right way. Modern techniques are EASIER than the old methods, not harder. It shocked me how natural and efficient they are. Most of the things we do wrong are simple things, fundamentals that almost anyone can learn. But... They have to be understood and practiced in a disciplined way. You cannot work up a new forehand or backhand by fiddling with it in between matches. Playing sets and matches with a poor shot will grant that bad shot virtual immortality. I'm convinced that developing a new technique requires time AWAY from competition--even "just for fun." Keeping score brings the old habit back unless it is well and truly killed. That means study and practice, and good professional teaching if you can afford it (though it's not absolutely necessary if you don't feel the need to play at college level--videos like these can be a great help.) And once a week with a pro alone... will... not... do it! Machines. Practice walls. Self-drops. And shadow swings, lots of shadow swings. (Weightlifters use mirrors to monitor their technique, and so can you.) This stuff works. The hardest part is accepting that it's okay to MISS--a key to significant change. You have to learn to hit the ball the right way before you start worrying whether it's going in or out. You might be surprised at how quickly a shot gets dependable if you do the right things and then don't go and undo them right away. It is possible. Takes work. Takes commitment. Takes a bit of patience. You'll surprise yourself. Hope this sermon gives you some encouragement. :-)
@tonylall76495 жыл бұрын
Well your commitment to the game has to be commended and I understand that in most cases improvements/adjustments can be made according to physical needs. Having not suffered any of the setbacks that you have and as a 45yr old playing for 3 years, 2 hours a week perhaps it sounds glib to say it's too late to improve on any aspect of the game. The comment was just a cursory analysis of what I find the benefits of the THB versus those of the SHB to be (And I must stress here that it is an observation made based on players in or around my standard, so for people who want to quote the likes Stan Wawrinka or Denis Shapovalov at me it's a waste of time.) Further to the issue of improvement I suppose I fall into the trap of focusing too heavily on my strengths ie the forehand and the serve rather than addressing weaknesses, but as a recreational player, come on! It's just a lot more fun and still progress is being made. Anyway I have taken the advice, playing more sliced backhands and trying to improve volleying. One final though on the debate of the one-hander versus the two-hander (just to be antagonistic.) I think the two-hander has another advantage and that is it can be hit with the weight distrubtion traveling back towards the centre of the court aiding with recovery, whereas if you want to hit a good one-hand topspin backhand you have to stay with the shot for longer and your weigh distribution takes you further out into the tramlines. Love the channel so will certainly keep watching!
@feed57503 жыл бұрын
Most beautiful backhands in the history of tennis: Gaudio and Federer. Both one-handed.
@Playyourcourt3 жыл бұрын
Some good looking backhands indeed. Thanks for watching!
@nickharvey8515 Жыл бұрын
I can hit both and like to change it up often to keep both shots tuned in and available. However, my 2hbh I have gained incredible offensive power/speed and topspin. I tend to come off the ground as I unload and drive through the shot, to which most are all 90+mph. If only I could figure the wrist lag and timing for forehand. I tend to overshoot baseline and can close the racket to maintain consistent offensive power returns. 😢
@emmanuelmakoba60852 жыл бұрын
One hander has more power because of it takes advantage of the natural stiff grip of a backhand (unlike the forehand). Two hander definitely seems like the better one to have overall in terms of consistency in groundstroke.
@josedeejay8 ай бұрын
Two handers are generally more powerful. You put your legs and torso on to the ball.
@michaellarsonlee5 жыл бұрын
"it came off pretty weird but hey" I laughed
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Michael Larson 😂 the big fellah is still getting over the comment. Was a good laugh though. Thanks for watching!
@eduardomt38235 жыл бұрын
3 out of 4 finalist of NITTO ATP are onehanded backhand.... What about that?
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
eduardo MT 😳 Definitely a strong statement. Those dudes are dropping 💣 💥!
@vanshagarwal23625 жыл бұрын
True however two of the big 3 members are some of the greatest players of all time and could be on their way to surpass Federer. Also it seems like two handed players have more consistency, even on their off days, while one handed players once their timing is off often spray balls and lac consistency. There really is no correct answer so just go with what works for you. I’m not what’s considered a tall player , my height is 5’9”, and a two hander is better for me with high balls. But I’ve always played two handed as it is more natural for me
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
And all four majors are held by a couple of guys with two-handers. Difference in points over the season is ridiculously large in favor of the two two-handed guys. The ATP Tour is about the majors. Indian Wells is pretty big, but still far behind. The ATP finals are a mere show. Round robin? Really? Guys losing matches--or even tanking matches--and still in the tournament? Bosh. Zverev won it last year. Proved nothing.
@PaulWolfe12 жыл бұрын
2HBH: no tennis elbow
@DanTuber5 жыл бұрын
2HB for control. 1HB for power.
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
...and the vast majority of amateur matches are decided by unforced errors. In the long ago I always smiled when I saw a one-hander across the net. "Ooooh, a weaker side! Free points!" --'cause most amateur players just don't hit it very well (even now.) It's a good shot if you have the courage to hit it, but it requires a level of confidence beyond the power of most of us. With the two-hander, I never had to be playing well to hit it well. Great accuracy. Great disguise (which, BTW, is functionally equal to power as it takes time away from the opponent.) Now, with my 58-year-old knees, I find I use the slice more...but you push a half-hearted topspin backhand at me, and I will EAT that ball with my forehand. (In my dotage I now have the modern forehand I never had when I actually cared about beating people lol.)
@jacksonlar5 жыл бұрын
Please get out the tape measure, measure the distances from left shoulder to racket head tip at the ideal contact point, and tell me which of the two styles gives you the longer reach for wide balls.
@edddzw74305 жыл бұрын
One hander creates more angles
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
Ever see Nalbandian hit a ball? Hseih Su-Wei?
@rajeshlparab4 жыл бұрын
@@charlesforee7082 , exception not rule.
@JavonWilliams293 жыл бұрын
Been using one handed backhand since I first started playing but as a left hander, looking to switch to two handed.
@Playyourcourt3 жыл бұрын
I actually just made the opposite change switching from a two-hander to a one hander. Love the idea of learning to go from one hand to two hands for content though! Thanks for watching and the feedback.
@michaelmesler11355 жыл бұрын
I find it a lot easier to create power with the one hander but that’s just me. Personally, I use the two hander for returns and then regular strokes with one hand.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Michael Mesler yup, it’s definitely just personal preference. I noticed an increase in power on the one hander as well but specifying on low balls. Not so much on high balls though. Thanks for watching -Nate
@michaelmesler11355 жыл бұрын
PlayYourCourt.com Thanks for commenting Nate btw I live in Yakima Washington and I was wondering if play your court has a community in this area.
@MicBur174 жыл бұрын
I prefer 2 hand backhand (idk tho because I’m on my first year) only reason why I prefer it is because I swing lefty in baseball, but in tennis I’m righty
@Playyourcourt4 жыл бұрын
Beast Burchett it’s total personal preference my friend. I work with a student that was a successful baseball player and he shared a similar sentiment / preference. Thanks for watching!
@Playyourcourt4 жыл бұрын
Want to meet new players & play more tennis? Try PlayYourCourt for free here: bit.ly/2HjZ0Gj Weak Backhand? Turn it into a weapon! Grab our Backhand Mastery Course for free here: bit.ly/2HecAvg Want to work with Scott & Nate? Check out upcoming live events and workshops here: bit.ly/36UGkXV
@crsantin3 жыл бұрын
There is no better. It really depends what works for you and what you’re comfortable with. I’m single handed because I’m older and that was the predominant backhand in the 70s. I’m so used to it now that switching makes no sense. Most modern players learn two handed now.
@Playyourcourt3 жыл бұрын
All very true Carlo, thanks for sharing!
@theroadrunnerjarhead41093 жыл бұрын
I think that anybody wanting to play tennis should take basic lessons on how to hit the forehand and backhand. Knowing how to hit the ball properly will enhance enjoyment of the game.
@Playyourcourt3 жыл бұрын
Learning the fundamentals are key, that's for sure. Thanks for watching!
@shpingalet78955 жыл бұрын
If I didn't see the title I would've thought about the battle of Nike vs. Adidas (the shirts)
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Shpinga let completely unintentional but funny how that worked out. Scott has the same wardrobe as a superhero and wears the same thing every film shoot. I should have known better. 🙄 -Nate
@shpingalet78955 жыл бұрын
@@Playyourcourt Thanks for the tips though. Turns out I need to figure how to improve my one-handed backhand vs. those high balls or to change to the 2-handed bh. I agree that the 1-handed bh is sexier and cooler :) we live in Fed's era after all.
@andressarmiento27775 жыл бұрын
I just like my two handed forehand
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
andres sarmiento all good my friend. To each their own!
@Hurry196715 жыл бұрын
I think there is a risk of misunderstanding: It is senseless to begin analysing the (dis) advantages of onehanded vs bihanded backhand and depending on that choose the "better" technique. Even the "better" technique doesnt help you if you are not capable to perform well with that new technique. Better to improve your backhand technique than to switch...
@ScoochPascucci2 жыл бұрын
I use a two handed backhand, although the one is definitely way sexier! Lol
@lszujo735 жыл бұрын
single handed is better if you can hit it....most can't.requires more strength,more practice/especially for return of serve/if you want to send your kid to college I recommend double handed/not enough time to develop the single handed....
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Laszlo Szujo it’s all personal preference but we agree the learning curve can be rather difficult with the one hander.
@twinwankel5 жыл бұрын
I don't know about your rating system. Fed comes over the ball and applies topspin on his returns all the time. He has stopped chipping the ball when the serve is close to his backhand. I personally have no problem knifing my backhand return to the servers feet on kickers. The two-hander is so ugly and clunky looking. It looks like players are just pushing the ball back. And like Bits of Pulp, I use open stance one-hander all the time. It neutralizes the timing advantage that 2 handers have. You can wait till the ball comes very close to you. I will only use the neutral stance when the ball is slower.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Wally Friend what up Wally..what’s your concerns with the rating system?
@ST-ek6lf2 жыл бұрын
I don’t think high balls are problems at atp level athletes. The biggest problem is the return. We play service and return all the time. Anyone can tip and slice. Nothing about one handed backhand return is better than double hander.. Grip change takes time. The millisecond grip change costs the timing and speed of the return. The high balls of the backhand return also comes in play . It’s nightmare.
@rangewarwick5 жыл бұрын
You could learn both.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Ranjit Samrai you definitely could but ultimately we really need to be decisive and have the choice be automatic when approaching to drive the ball. One could certainly have a THB on the drive and a OHB on the slice however. That would actually be the preferred method. Thanks for watching, we appreciate the feedback!
@ROCKSTAR32915 жыл бұрын
I will always love the one handers, when Federer retires, I will support Thiem, Tsitsipas, Shapo etc...
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Thang Nguyen those are definitely some solid selections to choose from!
@rayzheng80742 жыл бұрын
I am the 2 hander. I mean like Novak uses it and he is pretty good!
@Playyourcourt2 жыл бұрын
No doubt! 😉
@lucasoscar5 жыл бұрын
one-handed you have more range, less footwork, arguably more power? while two-handed you have more control, more defense, at the cost of less movement economy (didnt watch the video yet, hope i get something right ha) EDIT: ok i dont think i was that off, my "more power" thinking was the whole motion is bigger and wider, yeah you have 1 hand but at the same time your swing is massive and you translate more momentum from your feet, legs, hip, shoulders, you name it, also mid to low hit spots is easier one-handed)
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
lucasoscar well done, you were pretty much on the money my man. The power generated from the 2 strokes and which has more is definitely debatable due to the variance amongst players. There’s some massive OHB at the top of the game but most “recreational” players struggle producing that kinda pace. Looking at across the spectrum of abilities the THB generally produces more pop. Thanks for the feedback, much appreciated. 🤙🏼
@lucasoscar5 жыл бұрын
@@Playyourcourt the movement economy is a huge factor age wise, just crouching to hit a good two-handed backhand adds up a lot of stress on the body, specially on longer matches, i would say on kids if there is no preference go 2-handed, on adults probably 1
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
You do NOT have more range one-handed. You still have to make contact out front with leverage. Greater reach generally means a slice--and any competent two-hander can do it. And what little range you might gain you pay for in spades on the recovery when your shoulders aren't turned the right way. (This often gets left out of the discussion.) You do NOT have greater economy of movement because you need more space--not less--to execute the shot, and almost no ability to compensate if you're late. Low balls are NO easier for the one hander if you want to hit topspin. Slice is another matter, but any skilled player can learn to slice regardless of how many hands they use when driving the ball. (Think Ash Barty.) A good number of the advantages people like to attribute to the one-handed backhand apply only to the slice: Reach; ease of motion; low, short balls, simpler set-up; range on the way out (but not on the way back.) And nothing at all prevents a two-handed player from developing a great slice. Nothing. If they don't use it as much it's because they don't need it as much!
@lucasoscar5 жыл бұрын
@@charlesforee7082 i disagree, i know how to hit both. One-handed and topspin you still can save up to 1 step. 2 handed you need to be closer to the ball for sure.
@ltdgz38185 жыл бұрын
The thing is that during the 80s and 90s the one handed backhand was not taught that much, and has recently come back. You see young players using it again. I think tennis needs both.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Ltd Gz well said! No need to deal with absolutes when both are performed so effectively.
@antonboludo88862 жыл бұрын
I have a back problem so I must stick with the one-hander.
@Playyourcourt2 жыл бұрын
Sorry to hear that Anton, I can certainly relate.
@Andru007895 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your video, maybe M. Zverev can use both slice and thbh easier than other players with thbh, I like his style, how he uses the wrist to hit efforlessly and quickly
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Andru00789 we’re fans of Misha’s as well. Fun to watch one of the last true serve and volleyers of our time. Thanks for the feedback!
@ronm7114 Жыл бұрын
Well, the major pro for OHB is... its just much more fun.
@Playyourcourt Жыл бұрын
You're not wrong! 😉 -Nate
@ronm711411 ай бұрын
And with more fun comes more patience... played both and i dont mind rallying all day with a one hander cause i love hitting it. With a two hander its the exact opposite. It feels like work@@Playyourcourt
@CentaurusRelax314 Жыл бұрын
Two-handed seems like it should generate more power, but it has always felt odd to me. Like one arm isn't supposed to come across the body like that and the body is in the way. It just occurred to me that for someone like me who played baseball as a kid, a two-handed backhand feels as awkward as swinging a baseball bat left-handed.
@Playyourcourt Жыл бұрын
Very true and precisely why some choose to opt for a one-handed backhand. On the 2 hander focus on allowing your non-dominant hand to do most of the work., This will help it not feel so confined. Thanks for watching!
@tennistavet5 жыл бұрын
Nice video guys. What about 'disguise' between the two ? and top spin production ?
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
tennistavet ahhh yeah we missed those didn’t we. The OHB definitely wins out on topspin production. As for disguise I think that is dependent of the player. If lean towards the THB in that department though.
@studfinderball3 жыл бұрын
Scott and Nate SHOULD be teaching the Practical Backhand to rec players. By far the easiest technique against all those high bouncing copoly cheaters who have taken over the tennis world.
@Playyourcourt3 жыл бұрын
Hey, checked out some of your practical backhands. Looking good, definitely had some Borg style to it. As for the technique people select to use, as the saying goes..different strokes for different folks. Happy hitting sir!
@studfinderball3 жыл бұрын
@@Playyourcourt For sure, different strokes. Good juniors will find their own way. But if we're going to save rec tennis we need to make strokes as easy as pickleball, not ATP acceptable. The goal is fun, not Grand Slam wins.
@Riftinducer5 жыл бұрын
Great video, although I found it interesting that you guys mentioned teaching a two-hander for beginners, as I've been teaching my girlfriend to play and she's just naturally gone to a two-hander despite me using a one-hander. I'm not sure whether it's the extra stability in the wrist from the extra hand, not needing a special grip or that treating it like a left-handed forehand is just easier to remember for a new player, probably a combination of all three. Might have to try learning a two-hander, just out of curiosity.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Troy Smith thanks for watching! It’s all personal preference and what feels natural. We tend to introduce the THB first but there’s certainly occasions when the student is better suited and prefers the OHB. Good insights, thanks for sharing!
@zice2095 жыл бұрын
Ive actually kinda never seen a female wielding a 1hbh
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Th3speedoflight although not seen nearly as frequent as the THB there were some great one handers on the WTA including, Justin Henin, Gabriela Sabatini, Francesca Schiavone, and Stevie Graff (although entirely slice) There are very few being produced at a high level these day’s but perhaps that will change in the near future.
@sptennis87584 жыл бұрын
Dominique Thiem-Grigor Dimitrov? come on guys 😂 Great video btw
@Playyourcourt4 жыл бұрын
Those are definitely some top notch one handers.. Be honest did you get the spelling right on their names on the first try? We'd definitely utilize the copy / paste feature. ;)
@sptennis87584 жыл бұрын
@@Playyourcourt haha...i saw their names too many times displayed on the internet as well as on ATP Tennis TV schedule...wouldn't be that hard at the end :)
@raychayyc5 жыл бұрын
Please teach us the two handed backhand slice or overhead or drop shot or volley.
@raychayyc5 жыл бұрын
since you say the two handed backhand is better
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Ray Chay on the drive but certainly not on those strokes. At the end of the day every THB should have the ability to play with one hand on the slice and finesse shots. Figured that was a given. Thanks for the feedback.
@charlesforee70825 жыл бұрын
Connors' two-handed slice was actually a great shot. I use it on the rise on high balls, and the people I've hit with over the years have been pretty surprised at what can be done with it. Doesn't come up off the court at all, goes right through. They all swear that it accelerates after the bounce. (It doesn't. It just doesn't come up and doesn't slow down as much as most one-handers'. No loft on it.) Much easier on the shoulder and elbow than trying to chip up there, and lets me hold position instead of backing up. Pros these days are so good at hitting on the rise they don't need the shot.
@muuhoang75923 жыл бұрын
All the opinions surround the comparison of 1hbh vs 2hbh on a particular shot, ignoring the ingenuity of individual player reaction/move before the ball reaches him/her. One fact that no one can deny: you rarely saw 1hbh player using 2 hands in any shot; while all top 2hbh players used 1 hand in many situations, especially when they want to have a better reach.
@djp35252 жыл бұрын
Anyone ever use 2H for return of serve and 1H for everything else?
@Playyourcourt2 жыл бұрын
I'm actually currently using that exact set-up. Due to a wrist injury I switched to a one-hander a little under a year ago. I have found that I prefer it to my two hander especially with the left wrist being vulnerable to injury. With that being said it has healed enough to allow me to use it for return of serve on a limited basis. Love the one -hander but there's no doubt the two hander is better suited for the return of serve. Hope this helps. -Nate
@Nielsss214 жыл бұрын
Hello everyone, Advice needed on whether to switch from double handed to one handed. Footage in link below, thank you! kzbin.info/www/bejne/p5e7o6t5nq6Ce9E
@r.p.84025 жыл бұрын
Power? How about simple physics? The advanced one handed backhand is a much longer and faster swing. The decreased wrist flexibility (binding) of the two handed backhand prevents the long, fast release of the modern one handed backhand. Hands down the one hander wins on the power scale. Not convinced? Bounce feed the ball into a standing position with both backhands and see how much faster you can swing the racquet one handed. We readily see accomplished one handed backhands strike balls with more velocity than even the forehand. Its a longer more linear swing respective to the intended target. Disclaimer: do not attempt if rating is 5.0 or less.😂
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
R. P. We agree, when measured at the top of the game. For must recreational players they struggle to produce pace on the OHB due to poor technique / biomechanics, therefore the THB can be resourceful. Love the disclaimer. Thanks for watching!
@nicholask27605 жыл бұрын
Perfect always wondering if I should switch to a one handed backhand now that I'm looking for a new coach!
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
A 47 it’s really all personal preference and what feels right. As much as I like the feel of the one-hander it’s tough to relearn technique after 35+ years hitting with two hands. I think the process is worth working through though. Good luck with the new coach and thanks for watching!
@Borzacchinni3 жыл бұрын
I know this analysis is somewhat a joke or nothing to take too much from, but its a bit problematic that mostly one of the "judges" is, well, highly biased. I would enjoy a more cold and factual comparison for something like this. Nice video nevertheless
@Playyourcourt3 жыл бұрын
Thanks for watching, a little biased but ultimately that was Scotts honest opinion. None the less we tried to provide as many insights on both strokes. Appreciate the feedback and hope it helped!
@Borzacchinni3 жыл бұрын
@@Playyourcourt Thanks for the reply! Yes, the video highlighted some important topics in a clear way.
@abdoulayetoure1424 Жыл бұрын
Boris Becker, Gustavo Kuerten and Stanislas Wawrinka are all better than Federer at handling the high backhand. Players with a strong Eastern backhand grip like Justine Henin and Guga have an easier time with high one handed backhands.
@benny60225 жыл бұрын
I am badminton player
@farid14064 жыл бұрын
Mugs. You use your shoulder, pecs and hips with the one hander on a high ball and trust me, your opponent's strategy will change very quickly.
@219garry5 жыл бұрын
Next video.......Two hand vs One hand serve.
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
Gee purrs lol, brilliant! Let the debate begin 😉
@facebooksmith12694 жыл бұрын
As usual, it always depends on the player - their athleticism, endurance, strength ... Not necessarily the technique. Rafa and Novak and other backhanders are incredible athletes in tip top shape. So we really have to look at the era. Federer, compare to Rafa or Novak, is not as strong or athletic. Yet, Federer is considered the GOAT. I mean, one handed is infinitely superior if two people are the same in every other aspect. Arguably, 3 of the greatest players in history - Federer, Sampras, Laver - during their era - were all one handed backhanders. They routinely made running backhand winners. You simply cannot do that with 2 handed backhand. Running winners win tennis matches and if you can't do that from one side, you're greatly disadvantaged. But you can overcome that with superior strength, serve, athleticism - as Rafa and Novak does. Graf had no backhand at all. Essentially, her backhand was a slice. Occasionally, she'll hit a backhand winner - but it was a one handed backhand. But she was so much stronger in every other aspect, it did not matter. So rather than technique, it's the whole package. However, given everything else is equal, there's no question one hander is much superior.
@Playyourcourt4 жыл бұрын
facebook smith I really like your take on the athlete and how a players physical disposition helps determine the effectiveness of the backhand. I would have to argue that Federer is equally athletic as any other player that has played the game, perhaps not in strength but there are many aspects that make up athleticism. As for backhand winners on the run, Novak, Rafa, Agassi, Fognini, Monfils etc all have incredible offense on the move off their non dominant wing. We agree, however, it’s personal preference on the backhand and is largely determined by ones physical capabilities and what they deem comfortable. Thank for watching and the feedback!
@titofrost9585 жыл бұрын
If your a pushing clay court player. You defiantly want the two handed back hand.
@eagleshade115 жыл бұрын
Sampras had an awesome one hand backhand
@joshuasingyard56175 жыл бұрын
I have a one handed backhand. Create better angles and apply better spin than my Dad who has a two hander. I strike the backhand flatter than my forehand and I have more pace of the backhand side
@Playyourcourt5 жыл бұрын
joshua Singyard good insights, thanks for sharing. Curious though with your backhand being flatter is it as consistent as the forehand?
@joshuasingyard56175 жыл бұрын
@@Playyourcourt more consistent due to me having a bigger swing off that side. Moreover, I broke my wrist badly when younger so require to hold the racket flat.
@nelsonluisfreire89694 жыл бұрын
In pro tennis, consistency is key. And 2handed is much more consistent, due to much more muscles involved and wider timing range. But 2handed is ugly, and, for me it is almost cheating. It takes away the two personalities abilities involved in fore and back hand. If fact, 2handed cannot be considered back hand, because there is a hand in fore position (and that's what it's all about). So 2handed players "don't use" backhands. And this is ugly and unfair. I would ban 2handed shots, at least in the men's side. Unfortunately, that will never happen, and we have to stay with this ugly and unfair thing. No wonder the majority of the players use 2handed. They don't want to look elegant. They wanna win!
@Playyourcourt4 жыл бұрын
Appreciate the insights Nelson, thanks for watching!