Which Seahawks are Over & Under Hyped?

In an off-season of major changes some Seahawks are making waves in OTAs and beyond while others are flying completely under the radar. Who is hyped up and who isn't getting talked about enough... let's discuss!

[@jamesstradley3232]

Most under hyped Leslie Frasier GO HAWKS

[@SeaHawkersPodcast]

This is a good one!

[@jamesstradley3232]

Didn't Grubb say in a interview that he has been preparing for this job for a long time let's hope so GO HAWKS!!!

[@SeaHawkersPodcast]

Could he be the one!!!? Optomist in me says YES!!!

[@philhutton2094]

100% Agree about Geno. His performance has been top 10- 15 in the league for two years straight. The middle of the line was not good last year. Or the end of 2022, that's when he took the step back. A healthy line like Dak has, Geno would pick any defense apart, well expecte McDonald's🤞.

[@SeaHawkersPodcast]

Tackles weren't good last year, RT was a disaster without Abe. Let's see Geno with a decent line. Exciting times!

[@billytheweasel]

I always talk about blocking, and trenches in general. I'm a broken record.

[@SeaHawkersPodcast]

Turns out it's what wins NFL games... Who knew!!!?

[@jamesstradley3232]

GO HAWKS

[@SeaHawkersPodcast]

Go Hawks James!!!

[@jamesstradley3232]

Yeah it's not like Dre mont forgot how to play football it had to be something with the coaching GO HAWKS!!!

[@SeaHawkersPodcast]

Plus now he's just a solid piece in a rotation and not the savior.

[@gamblingoat1787]

Go Hawks!

[@SeaHawkersPodcast]

GG!!! Thx dude Go Hawks!

[@dezzdinn]

Just wanted to make sure I noted adams takes are all CATFISH CATFISHING CATFISH…. especially the take about the WALLEYE

[@SeaHawkersPodcast]

😂😂. Fucking hilarious as always Barry. Adam

[@ace448]

Sorry but I’d take the side that Riq disappoints this season. He blew key coverages in multiple games the cowboys and whiners in particular and I think was a key component to the defensive struggles. It got worse as the season progressed too. Now could he bounce back…sure I don’t think it’s likely. Scheme and coaching will matter I just doubt we will see rookie Riq again.

[@Perfumery_by_Sabin]

I’m almost certain he will do better than last season though. Hard not to.

[@SeaHawkersPodcast]

I think we all agreed he's got the highest variance. Could be a pro-bowler again.... Could be benched by week 6 if he's not fundamentally working for Macdonald. He 100% has blue chip talent that very very very few guys have. They called him Tariq the Freak for a reason.

[@boeklo1251]

The NFL pseudo-intellectual-jargon misuse of the word "multiple" is so cringey and triggering to the grammar Nazi in me: adjective -- "having or involving several parts, elements, or members".

[@boeklo1251]

Same thing with "concept"

[@Perfumery_by_Sabin]

Over my head 💨

[@SeaHawkersPodcast]

I think the concept (see what I did there?) is to appear multiple, appear like there are extra or more parts than "normal" if you will and on an individual level, a QB can't account for what a singular dude is going to do on any given play. Ravens had a very low blitz % ... Yet give off the appearance of multiple blitzing players over and over again. BTW you should never ever Google Double Slit Experiment. Go Hawks!!!!!

[@boeklo1251]

@@SeaHawkersPodcast defenses have multiple parts and that's why the word multiple doesn't say anything about the defense. A more accurate and descriptive term would be something like "deceptive" or "variable". "Multiple blitzing players" is a proper use of the word. An individual player being "multiple" or a defense being "multiple" are absurd and empty uses of the term respectively.

[@boeklo1251]

@@SeaHawkersPodcast also yes I see what you did with the word concept and that was a correct use of the term unlike the way it's being used by NFL pundits. Why don't they just say "play"?! 😆. It's because they're grasping at words to seem extra sophisticated or intellectual.