In an off-season of major changes some Seahawks are making waves in OTAs and beyond while others are flying completely under the radar. Who is hyped up and who isn't getting talked about enough... let's discuss!
Пікірлер: 26
@jamesstradley32322 ай бұрын
Most under hyped Leslie Frasier GO HAWKS
@SeaHawkersPodcast2 ай бұрын
This is a good one!
@jamesstradley32322 ай бұрын
Didn't Grubb say in a interview that he has been preparing for this job for a long time let's hope so GO HAWKS!!!
@SeaHawkersPodcast2 ай бұрын
Could he be the one!!!? Optomist in me says YES!!!
@philhutton20942 ай бұрын
100% Agree about Geno. His performance has been top 10- 15 in the league for two years straight. The middle of the line was not good last year. Or the end of 2022, that's when he took the step back. A healthy line like Dak has, Geno would pick any defense apart, well expecte McDonald's🤞.
@SeaHawkersPodcast2 ай бұрын
Tackles weren't good last year, RT was a disaster without Abe. Let's see Geno with a decent line. Exciting times!
@billytheweasel2 ай бұрын
I always talk about blocking, and trenches in general. I'm a broken record.
@SeaHawkersPodcast2 ай бұрын
Turns out it's what wins NFL games... Who knew!!!?
@jamesstradley32322 ай бұрын
GO HAWKS
@SeaHawkersPodcast2 ай бұрын
Go Hawks James!!!
@jamesstradley32322 ай бұрын
Yeah it's not like Dre mont forgot how to play football it had to be something with the coaching GO HAWKS!!!
@SeaHawkersPodcast2 ай бұрын
Plus now he's just a solid piece in a rotation and not the savior.
@gamblingoat17872 ай бұрын
Go Hawks!
@SeaHawkersPodcast2 ай бұрын
GG!!! Thx dude Go Hawks!
@dezzdinn2 ай бұрын
Just wanted to make sure I noted adams takes are all CATFISH CATFISHING CATFISH…. especially the take about the WALLEYE
@SeaHawkersPodcast2 ай бұрын
😂😂. Fucking hilarious as always Barry. Adam
@ace4482 ай бұрын
Sorry but I’d take the side that Riq disappoints this season. He blew key coverages in multiple games the cowboys and whiners in particular and I think was a key component to the defensive struggles. It got worse as the season progressed too. Now could he bounce back…sure I don’t think it’s likely. Scheme and coaching will matter I just doubt we will see rookie Riq again.
@Perfumery_by_Sabin2 ай бұрын
I’m almost certain he will do better than last season though. Hard not to.
@SeaHawkersPodcast2 ай бұрын
I think we all agreed he's got the highest variance. Could be a pro-bowler again.... Could be benched by week 6 if he's not fundamentally working for Macdonald. He 100% has blue chip talent that very very very few guys have. They called him Tariq the Freak for a reason.
@boeklo12512 ай бұрын
The NFL pseudo-intellectual-jargon misuse of the word "multiple" is so cringey and triggering to the grammar Nazi in me: adjective -- "having or involving several parts, elements, or members".
@boeklo12512 ай бұрын
Same thing with "concept"
@Perfumery_by_Sabin2 ай бұрын
Over my head 💨
@SeaHawkersPodcast2 ай бұрын
I think the concept (see what I did there?) is to appear multiple, appear like there are extra or more parts than "normal" if you will and on an individual level, a QB can't account for what a singular dude is going to do on any given play. Ravens had a very low blitz % ... Yet give off the appearance of multiple blitzing players over and over again. BTW you should never ever Google Double Slit Experiment. Go Hawks!!!!!
@boeklo12512 ай бұрын
@@SeaHawkersPodcast defenses have multiple parts and that's why the word multiple doesn't say anything about the defense. A more accurate and descriptive term would be something like "deceptive" or "variable". "Multiple blitzing players" is a proper use of the word. An individual player being "multiple" or a defense being "multiple" are absurd and empty uses of the term respectively.
@boeklo12512 ай бұрын
@@SeaHawkersPodcast also yes I see what you did with the word concept and that was a correct use of the term unlike the way it's being used by NFL pundits. Why don't they just say "play"?! 😆. It's because they're grasping at words to seem extra sophisticated or intellectual.