Igor: did you see the empty space on that ship? Ivan: yes. Igor: make sure I don't see it again.
@sharpstriker15592 жыл бұрын
US during WW2
@andycheek7662 жыл бұрын
It's two different philosophies about military equipment one is durable, cheap, easy to
@ronemtae34682 жыл бұрын
Do USA is planning on launching 200 submarines over the next 36 months more reliable more difficult to find far more difficult to defend against and of course proven to be much more effective
@charlesburke2379 Жыл бұрын
Your correct. However, the US fleet retires a ship for each new ship produced. Making it near impossible to create a larger US fleet.
@asankasandeepa6732 жыл бұрын
tecnology 1st
@specialman60042 жыл бұрын
ah yes, everybody in comment section are experts I see.
@arthas6402 жыл бұрын
Most of the comments are memes and jokes though
@sdservin2 жыл бұрын
As usual
@robandcheryls2 жыл бұрын
Well, as a matter of a fact I…. 😂
@idk-oj5do2 жыл бұрын
Ikr experts at being goofy
@defus30802 жыл бұрын
1:47 this ship has recently been promoted to submarine
@stephencarlos93282 жыл бұрын
Imao.
@stephencarlos93282 жыл бұрын
Imao.
@darthsidious61672 жыл бұрын
@@giacomogiacomo1194 Don't have kids
@ercapitanoderoma74112 жыл бұрын
No there are 3 of Moskova class
@bradolfpittler28752 жыл бұрын
The Moskva was able to destroy TWO Neptune missiles.
@tsmatthx22 жыл бұрын
And then ukraine sank it's best ship
@dragannaric7652 Жыл бұрын
you believe too much in the media and the internet and in what they market, and you are not smart enough to investigate exactly what happened to the cruiser, but be sure that the Ukrainians did not sink it, but that incident was very convenient for them to attribute it to themselves as their success, and of course you from the US you present it as the incompetence of the Russian army, but you yourself know that Russia can never lose a war, the sooner you understand it, the sooner it will be better for all of us
@jayvhoncalma3458 Жыл бұрын
@@tsmatthx2 it's aa wasn't able to work due to being cannibalized for parts
@QuicksilverVM5 ай бұрын
@@tsmatthx2 best ship ^^ is what they tell you ? look up how old it was^^ btw did you see any footage ukraine sunk it? coz i did see a lil footage of how they tryed to pull it back to harbour and it took almost 24 hours to sink and everyone besides 7 dudes i think was evacuated . this 7 dudes fucked around with the old torpedos and sunk the ship. shit happens
@mayureshrasam17082 жыл бұрын
Russian be like " I paid for full deck I will use the full Deck"
@Grogag6842 жыл бұрын
So that it can easily sink....
@Evilmidnightbomber28702 жыл бұрын
I always figured the Russian’s military doctrine assumed warships would probably get only one chance to use their weapons in an all out naval battle, so put them all up on deck where they could be fired immediately, and if the ship survives, great, rearm and send back out. Well, even if that's not the reason, it does make the ships look more intimidating.
@ronemtae34682 жыл бұрын
Russian reliability is virtually half of almost every other country when it comes to weapons and defenses that’s why they carry twice as many because they’re not that effective
@generalsirc26152 жыл бұрын
I could see a real issue with putting too many weapons on a ship, one hit could start a chain reaction destroying the entire ship.
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
That sounds about right...
@theduke16542 жыл бұрын
Same goes for an aircraft carrier . If a Russian hypersonic missile hits the deck of the carrier its pretty much useless .Not to mention the fact that the russian hypersonic missiles are un-interceptable
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
@@theduke1654 • US carriers now have defenses to deal with incoming hypersonic missile threats Duke...
@153_212 жыл бұрын
Aged well
@darthsidious61672 жыл бұрын
@@theduke1654 Russia isn't the only country with hypersonic missiles
@warszawa71572 жыл бұрын
Oh look the ill fated Moscova now a submarine
@kleeblattchen382 жыл бұрын
Of course the effectiveness of a warship depends on more than just the amount of armament but the thing that really startles me is the lacking weaponry on the littoral combat ships... they were designed to replace the perry class frigates and tasked with defending the coastlines but to outsiders it almost seems like they don't have any offensive capabilities... since the naval strike missile etc. were only later additions, the naval gun and 1 single searam (or cwis) were technically all they had as armament... like, what kind of "warship" is that... there are mine sweepers with the same kind of armament...
@ashcarrier66062 жыл бұрын
They sound like the most powerful U.S. Coast Guard frigates ever made.
@decentish85462 жыл бұрын
Why? So the ammunition can denote and destroy the ship when Ukrainian missiles hit them.
@tharblin2 жыл бұрын
The difference between US and Russian equipment is that the US equipment works.
@mrP1N4ER2 жыл бұрын
Lmao but true
@charlesburke2379 Жыл бұрын
Russian weapons were central to the US defeat in Vietnam. And they also brought Israel to the edge of defeat in the 1973 Mideast war. Mao used Russian weapons to defeat Chinese nationalists. US weapons are so incredibly expensive even the highest quality systems are rarely mass produced.
@MsNextgeneration122 жыл бұрын
After they break down and are being towed back to port they need to defend themselves and especially the tugboats.
@Jykobe4912 жыл бұрын
Classic Americans underestimating their rivals
@theduke16542 жыл бұрын
@@Jykobe491yup. those muricans got wrecked by rice farmers and afghan herdsmen
@darthsidious61672 жыл бұрын
@@theduke1654 So did the soviets
@darthsidious61672 жыл бұрын
@@Jykobe491 Oh yeah like Moscow totally didn't sink
@SergeantEagle2 жыл бұрын
everyone gangsta till russia makes the yamato but its modern
@v12tommy9 ай бұрын
Sticking all your weapons on one ship definitely makes that ship more of a formidable foe, but it is also putting all your eggs in 1 basket if something were to happen to that ship too. As Russia learned when the Moskva was promoted last year to submarine, third rate.
@surinderjitsingh89542 жыл бұрын
Maintenance would always remain an important issue
@ThatCarGuy2 жыл бұрын
To big and slow. It would need it's own strike group. Russia is a poor nation and can't afford many ships hence needing to fill the ships they have to the top with weapons.
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
This vid isn't 100% accurate...
@ThatCarGuy2 жыл бұрын
@@franktank4360 No video is, but it doesnt change the fact this ship is 252 meters long/ 827 feet, and turns so slow, and is just a slow ship overall do to it's size. Nothing is perfect, everything has it's pros and cons, and this ship is just weighted down with a lot of weaponry.
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
@@ThatCarGuy • True...
@legobuildingsrewiew75382 жыл бұрын
Russian propaganda channel back at it again.
@RaptorRotorHead2 жыл бұрын
Because their equipment routinely fails to work so they got to put a whole bunch extra on it to try to make it work
@duanepigden13372 жыл бұрын
Check out USA failure rate.
@RaptorRotorHead2 жыл бұрын
@@duanepigden1337 USA test weapons first before going to war with them that's the difference that's the failure rate you're talkin about during test dose don't end up on the ship during a war
@duanepigden13372 жыл бұрын
@@RaptorRotorHead -- the Patriot missile system missed every intercept during the first gulf war for instance.
@thickboi43042 жыл бұрын
@@RaptorRotorHead ye ur really are an i d iot If u think Russian doesn’t test its weapons during development
@RaptorRotorHead2 жыл бұрын
@@duanepigden1337 that's not apples to apples and oranges the oranges a patriot missile is a bullet trying to hit another bullet a Russian cruise missile is launched it from a boat and landing in the apartment building that's the difference now if you want to talk about our cruise missiles against Russian cruise missiles our cruise missiles don't land in apartment buildings
@mekov16642 жыл бұрын
PLS make Russian subtitles, I'm from Russia and I love watching your videos.
@Top3-v1z2 жыл бұрын
Do russian support ukraine invasion ?
@lazypizzaship89112 жыл бұрын
From what I heard there are.protest in Russia for the invasion but whenever I try to click the article the site shuts down the page.
@Top3-v1z2 жыл бұрын
@@lazypizzaship8911 Protests mean nothing, even american protested Against USA invasion. Russia need revolution to decapitate Putin decision
@barbaragordon90792 жыл бұрын
@@Top3-v1z did the US govn stop the war when there were protest about the war in Vietnam and Iraq? (edit: grammar)
@RasPutintheGreat2 жыл бұрын
@@Top3-v1z in your dreams mate.
@garethhahahah20372 жыл бұрын
Why are Russian warship more heavily armed compared to the US? Giving the amount of missile landing in Ukraine and not exploding, I think that might be the reason why.
@henrytorres65232 жыл бұрын
Maybe because it's a piece of junk..
@duanepigden13372 жыл бұрын
What is your source of info?
@titanproductions36282 жыл бұрын
@@duanepigden1337 his Source came from his ass and CNN propaganda 😂
@RunPJs2 жыл бұрын
Whilst I don't like Russia....there technology is as good and sometimes better than anyone elses. Go look up some I'd their greatest kit
@TooTallDean2 жыл бұрын
gareth hahahah Are you maybe mistaking the empty canister from a cluster munitions rocket for a failed missle ?
@musangtvetcetera77792 жыл бұрын
Vulnerable to blast Russian ship
@panzerkampfwagenviiimaus39762 жыл бұрын
Heavier but not superior
@georgekalafatis72862 жыл бұрын
They're nice and heavy so when they hit the bottom they can hear them all the way back home
@j.m.youngquist4192 жыл бұрын
They do make a beautiful looking ship.
@michaelwong4303 Жыл бұрын
The 🇺🇸 destroyers have 96 VLS, cruisers 112 VLS. All in a ship of. 9000`to 10000 tons. Ton for ton wise 🇺🇸 ships have 1 VLS to every 100 tons. Do 🇷🇺 war ships have the same ratio?
@direpetto2 жыл бұрын
4.38 «fortunately»❓
@davidswink66532 жыл бұрын
This totally insane analysis ...you miss the gazillion frigates in multiple configurations and destroyers Really did you do any research before making this
@PETE4955 Жыл бұрын
Primary due to Russian Goverment paranoia, which makes it ineffective as a military machine.
@unknownsourceofficial62152 жыл бұрын
Why rassian warships heavy compered us warsgip Becouse rassain Warships Are very advanced armerod technolgies
@soldierboy83262 жыл бұрын
Somalian fleet is the strongest
@shanebraaten95532 жыл бұрын
Unless they're going up against Tom Hanks... Lmao 🤣
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
Or Chuck Norris...
@Kane-ib5sn2 жыл бұрын
different design philosophy. American warships travel a greater distance, require space to be used for stores, anti-air, and anti-sub, with anti-surface (ship to ship) being the least important aspect. speed and endurance being prime considerations. Russian warships expect to have less air-cover (Russia having few allies - being authoritarian in nature) - but possessing superior, long-range anti-aircraft missiles. however, American warships can shoot more anti-air-missiles as a result of reduced range-of-missiles. Russian warships having par anti-sub protection.
@nquggg69712 жыл бұрын
that's is . The US is stationed all around the world , Russia and China are in their own bubble and bc of that fact , they need to worry about themselves and bordering allies . So frankly said , US is on the attack side and vice versa
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH2 жыл бұрын
@@nquggg6971 us are invaders and have puppet allies, russian are defensive.
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH2 жыл бұрын
why do you need to travel far, authoritarian do that. They install their will on surroundings, make colonies.
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
Oh boy___here you go again..!
@davidswink66532 жыл бұрын
Comparing one outdated warship limited to the black sea to a integrated fleet of frigates ans destroyers Oh and death from aircraft carriers Aircraft carrier on board weapons are for crap that can get past the defensive shield around it
@abrahamdozer62732 жыл бұрын
"Why are Russian warship more heavily armed compared to the US" You mean "apparently " more heavily armed. The Kirov Class Is a great, big obsolete piece of Cold War theatre. Those massive, useless missiles up there on the desk weathering away look HUGE, like they've unzipped their fly and are swinging their appendage around for all to see. FEARSOME! ... and so 1975. An American Ardleigh destroyer outguns this sea-borne dinosaur but hey ... you can't see the missiles so it's less manly.
@apsgeneralstudies56732 жыл бұрын
How do u think , Ur lame arleigh burke can outgun a kirov plz explain .
@jefftukangjeff Жыл бұрын
slava class = Moskva. needs only 2 Neptuns to sink it.... think about it !
@fredblogs2 жыл бұрын
🇬🇧 The more weapon’s they carry allows them to sink faster.
@varunghosh2384 Жыл бұрын
U gave more reasons why the us doesn't keep more weapons than the Russians
@QuicksilverVM5 ай бұрын
better have it and not need it , its what the meris usualy say^^
@Falcodevienna2 жыл бұрын
How many do they have? Oh, one. OK.
@jjuanmarin2 жыл бұрын
and is for defense not to attack and now you guys question why russia invaded ukraine the russians were being encircledyou always make fun of russian arms not working of not having money their budget is very low compared to the west the whole russian economy lower than the state of texas yet nato got closer and closer to the poor failed country of russia how come now the innocent people of ukraine are paying the price they believed the lies of the leaders of the west
@Falcodevienna2 жыл бұрын
@@jjuanmarin Fun fact: Every country is encircled. These are your neighbors. If you behave like an a-hole, they are not your friends. Nobody believes Putin, and soon, nobody will like Russia anymore.
@trevorle73822 жыл бұрын
@@Falcodevienna encircled by enemy him missing a detail and you picking it out doesn’t make you right. And that’s bullshit, tons of people like Putin, not that I agree with them
@trevorle73822 жыл бұрын
@@Falcodevienna And uhm, you do realize that if you’re right, Russia has all the reason it needs to go to war with it’s enemies. It’s gonna die anyway, why go alone?
@Falcodevienna2 жыл бұрын
@@trevorle7382 Re to your statements: Approval rates for Putin are that low that people dare open protest in the cities of Russia. And yeah, if you are a maniac, you may want to „take people with you“. But I guess between him and this suicide mission, there are many brave Russian soldiers that would intervene.
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH2 жыл бұрын
US has ships targeted for invasion (air carriers). Russia has ships targeted for defense (rocket warships).
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
Oh boy..!
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH2 жыл бұрын
@@franktank4360 what "oboy". Missile warship can destroy radar defenses, selective large targets, but it can't establish dominance over a territory over prolonged time until main forces arrive.
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
@@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH • First you said "Russia has ships targeted for defense: rocket warships" now you're saying "it can't establish dominance over territories for prolonged periods until main forces arrives" just get to the point...
@totenkult0 Жыл бұрын
A 130mm gun isn't massive...
@Villain18742 жыл бұрын
Why are Russian warship more heavily armed compared to the US - it’s so they make a bigger bang when they are hit and sunk by Nato 🇺🇦🇬🇧
@trevorle73822 жыл бұрын
The NATO that promised UKR they’ll let it join even though they never will, even when they could have done that to prevent the war
@Cameraman1482 жыл бұрын
Simple we have more ships....
@drbendover74672 жыл бұрын
No, they are not, for each equivalent size, Russian ships have a lot fewer missiles:)
@trevorle73822 жыл бұрын
….why you’re counting meer missiles number? It’s like saying a pubg squad is more heavily armed than a tank. A tank has 3 guns, the squad has 12 and use 4 at a time
@trevorle73822 жыл бұрын
The chinese is using this logic to say they have a bigger fleet than the US
@mamba4live5642 жыл бұрын
and today is gone no more 👍🏾
@AlejandroGarcia-fy8qr2 жыл бұрын
What a ship wow awesome
@davedisinger12452 ай бұрын
Repairments???
@fepasarussa86422 жыл бұрын
I can tell, sending a cruiser made totally to atack carriers at open sea to do the job a few frigates could do is a dumb idea
@readynow123452 жыл бұрын
Just like the Yamamoto was, yet it was sunk so fast, aircraft carriers rule period.
@mrliberty84682 жыл бұрын
Why? Because it weapons only work half of the time.
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
Are you sure? I think you better fax check that...
@esecallum2 жыл бұрын
because 70% failure rate
@laurynasragickas16432 жыл бұрын
Russian warship went to... :)
@surinderjitsingh89542 жыл бұрын
I guess they are good at packing ammo
@j.m.youngquist4192 жыл бұрын
They have less so they need more on what they have.
@RadicalCluster Жыл бұрын
me when building ships in a game:
@davidguy91972 жыл бұрын
belle analyse et bonne explication des besoin et attentes ayant présidés à la conception de ces navires
@specs_u2 жыл бұрын
Big mistake, making more heavily armored ships makes it so you cant make a lot of them. You need a lot of resources. 2 not so heavily armored ships are better than 1 heavily armored ship.
@JoaoSoares-rs6ec2 жыл бұрын
i disagree
@ragey6662 жыл бұрын
Lmao you need to go and have a look at some of the WW2 battles at sea.
@TheAknativeboy2 жыл бұрын
@@ragey666 midway and guatecanal were actually insane battles
@JoaoSoares-rs6ec2 жыл бұрын
@@TheAknativeboy guadalcanal was mostly land battle, there were few naval battles mostly destroyers. Midway was carrier battle
@trevorle73822 жыл бұрын
Wrong, because they don’t have enough resource for more ships, they stack more onto fewer ships to fit their needs
@mausypanzer51422 жыл бұрын
Can you imagine if that thing join the Carrier Strike force.
@darthsidious61672 жыл бұрын
Too late it sunk
@coolsquad74282 жыл бұрын
Usa supposed to get the lazer guns as of 2021 and 2022
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH2 жыл бұрын
and light swords.
@Maddythebaddy2 жыл бұрын
us navy would destroy that ship in seconds
@Falcodevienna2 жыл бұрын
Wait and it will sink by itself like the Kursk.
@andycheek7662 жыл бұрын
Manufacturer, doesn't require a lot of sophisticated maintenance support. This is how they beat the Germans. Well we on the other hand are relying on our technology and heavily engineered equipment that requires continuous maintenance and upkeep and we'll all find out on the battlefield one day I'm afraid which philosophy works. I suspect that it's dependent on the duration of the conflict
@trevorle73822 жыл бұрын
I dislike the US more than Russia, but you’re fine bro, the US Navy is doing fine :))))
@darthsidious61672 жыл бұрын
@@trevorle7382 No it isn't, the navy is getting rid of more ships than its building. Leaving the US vulnerable if China ever attacks.
@guillermorojas5424 Жыл бұрын
No su eres estadounidense, debes saber que los Sovieticos fueron los que derrotaron a la Alemania Nazi, enterate de la verdadera historia
@DayneJAH3332 жыл бұрын
America like to work hard not easy. 5 Sherman tank vs. 1 Tiger tank
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
Not no more...
@DayneJAH3332 жыл бұрын
@@franktank4360 Russian tanks have more armor Guns have longer range More fire power.
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
@@DayneJAH333 • That's your opinion...
@JoaoSoares-rs6ec2 жыл бұрын
no offence but i perfer to see a ship with guns then one whit a pea shhoter, like in us and european navies.
@jjuanmarin2 жыл бұрын
i agree
@JoaoSoares-rs6ec2 жыл бұрын
@@jjuanmarin and me thinking I was the only one
@trevorle73822 жыл бұрын
Exactly what is the peashooter?? The missiles?
@JoaoSoares-rs6ec2 жыл бұрын
@@trevorle7382 yes the missiles, but in this case I was referring to the very small guns on the ships,
@hardyanpajero692 жыл бұрын
👍😎🍺🍩🚢🚀
@yrsrig76072 жыл бұрын
.
@zzlhaiqal2 жыл бұрын
i think i heard that caption before...but where huh??
@mathewferstl70422 жыл бұрын
wonder where from...
@RasPutintheGreat2 жыл бұрын
Here, same
@qwill82542 жыл бұрын
It's economic, Russi wants more bang for its bucks , in America cooperation have taken over so more vessel means more profitable.
@li71462 жыл бұрын
Sub indo please
@faqihaqil90442 жыл бұрын
kenapa?? nggak faham bahasa inggeris ya??😂😂.. nggak hairan lah kenapa begitu byk hoax dan cerita bohong di Indon😁😁
@li71462 жыл бұрын
@@faqihaqil9044 makanya gw minta sub lol
@ryansarwidyanto38812 жыл бұрын
@@li7146 Install duolingo bang klo mo belajar bahasa inggris dgn cepat dan murah (btw saya bukan sales nya duolingo yak wkwkwkwk)
@wilomica2 жыл бұрын
When many of your weapons won't work like they're Hammer tech from Iron Man, you compensate by making a ton of them & hope some go bang when you try to fight?
@PedroSanchez3002 жыл бұрын
Before a Russian ship launches a torpedo boat or a missile, it is already at the bottom of the ocean.
@theduke16542 жыл бұрын
typical american ,underestimating a rival
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
@@theduke1654 • Russia already lost, guess Putin underestimated Ukraine...
@ragey6662 жыл бұрын
here we go begging for views
@celsorvl90862 жыл бұрын
Glory to the Russian people!!!Long live President PUTIN!!!🐻🐻❄🐻
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
Jabrone...
@Nekminute2 жыл бұрын
Russia is just better at everything it does
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
Nope...
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH2 жыл бұрын
@@franktank4360 not good at invading, not good at misinformation, not good at making puppets.
@franktank43602 жыл бұрын
@@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH • Putin's your liege and you're his marionette and he made the biggest mistake, can you figure that out or guess what it is? 1nce you've figured that out___let me know...
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH2 жыл бұрын
@@franktank4360 Slogan, slogan, slogan as Johnson said "Russia blablabla" during hard shelling of east ukraine. Russia no more blablabla.
@HECKAKYH-ADEKBATEH2 жыл бұрын
@@franktank4360 reference to "Russia blablabla" - Boris Johnson Press conference with NATO, on Pupia News channel, timecode 11:19