Thanks to HelloFresh for sponsoring today's video. Go to strms.net/hellofresh_mandjtv, use my code MANDJTVFREE, and receive one free breakfast item per box while subscription is active.
@Junho699 ай бұрын
Thanks
@CharzzTheAnimated9 ай бұрын
HAHA, IT IS I, GRUNTY BOY
@Zer0AsWell9 ай бұрын
Hi Mikey!
@Mr_Mistake199 ай бұрын
Hi Mikey
@DaSnickerLicker9 ай бұрын
Ah yes I hate it when someone waves and I wave back but they were saying *HELLO* to someone else, especially when it happens with my friend *FRESH*
@kirailazuli29419 ай бұрын
Since you mentioned Fezandipiti, I love poking fun at it for the fact that despite being CLEARLY a bird, it actually has the Ground type weakness due to him being part Poison type. This means you can literally kick mud at that bird and he'll go down.
@AlecRiding9 ай бұрын
Poor team sku
@SleepingTroubles9 ай бұрын
meanwhile Dodrio is immune to ground
@pemanilnoob9 ай бұрын
I actually didn’t use ground moves on it first cause I thought “well it’s a bird of course it won’t work” Then I thought “oh it’s not flying type” and then “oh it doesn’t even have levitate?”
@kirailazuli29419 ай бұрын
@@pemanilnoob No worries! I actually found out completely by accident when I sent out my Cetitan against it. I knew he was Poison type naturally, but I jokingly used a Ground move against him to see what would happen. Needless to say, I felt pretty evil that day! 😈
@kobsterpro9 ай бұрын
Also, Fezandipiti is in a very similar situation to a lot of the ones mentioned, Fairy is its true type but poison is just from the chain. Would most likely just be a fairy/flying type without it.
@HaxTheCharizard9 ай бұрын
And this is why Lance the "Dragon Tamer" uses Pokemon that aren't dragon types. A pokemon can be a dragon without being a dragon type.
@ChaoticTeen169 ай бұрын
@TheTarekDude They're just reiterating what Lance himself said in Pokémon Masters.
@arunramani17249 ай бұрын
For me Its Birdkeeper Lance 🤣😂
@francishong79489 ай бұрын
That's true, all of lance's pokemon are dragon like at thevery least (aerodactyl kind of a a stretch but dragon and dinosaurs share the same word in Japanese)
@andrewkatz66499 ай бұрын
Yep! Gyarados and Charizard are both anatomically dragons but got two other types that fit them.
@MorrisPXG9 ай бұрын
@@arunramani1724bro can’t even talk to Dialga and Giratina😂 which are dragon type
@ND861198 ай бұрын
"Uh, we don't need to mention blood-bending, this is a kids show." Mikey probably
@MrRage-lg1ts8 ай бұрын
“Since mega evolution is gone.” BOY DO I HAVE SOME NEWS FOR YOU!
@Shadow103458 ай бұрын
Watching this after the recent announcement really is Fate's Comedic Genius
@gretchenknotts96388 ай бұрын
I thought the same thing!
@bsg-jay70938 ай бұрын
To be fair, it never left the spin offs
@jembozaba48648 ай бұрын
Here’s hoping they fix Charizard. I want the mega forms. Have the design, stats and ability of Y, with the typing and flame colour of X. Also put that 20 point attack increase that Y gets into speed, because no one is using that attack stat when the special stat is so high
@jaden56768 ай бұрын
THERE IS NO WAY TELL ME YOUR NOT LYING IS IT ACTUALLY RETURNING
@KittAxoIsHere9 ай бұрын
“Haha, not all dragons are Dragon-type Pokémon!” - Lance My boy Lance backing Charizard up…I respect it
@erikkesler17398 ай бұрын
And gyarados as well.
@micahelsgames70248 ай бұрын
@@erikkesler1739 That only applies for students of blueberry(or have been in the past) people traveling,living in, or vacationing in alola (once again if they have)
@erikkesler17398 ай бұрын
@@micahelsgames7024 No? Lance has a Gyarados in Red and Blue? as well as every team he has with three or more pokemon until Black and White. Meaning the not all Dragons are Dragon type quote directly applies to Gyarados as well?
@MirageUchiha8 ай бұрын
_"Conversely, not all Dragon-type Pokémon are dragons."_ - Idk, some guy... 🤷🏾♂️
@alexs58148 ай бұрын
My Boi Lance is is a Flying type Trainer first and foremost...
@ZettaPrime8 ай бұрын
If it looks like one, sounds like one and acts like one, it’s a dragon.
@justinn8541akaDrPokemon9 ай бұрын
Can't wait for the Lugia Paradox. Where water type makes sense, that's what the original designer's intent, but the developers deseded to make is psychic type "to make it seem powerful" despite the nerfs psychic type got in gen 2.
@CharzzTheAnimated9 ай бұрын
And the Florgess paradox
@justinn8541akaDrPokemon9 ай бұрын
@@CharzzTheAnimated At least florgess has a type that makes sense(even though it makes complete sense for it to have the grass type too).
@Pastel_Diamond_Studios9 ай бұрын
Honestly, I could see Lugia being either Water/Flying or Water/Dragon. Water/Flying makes more scenes but Water/Dragon could help with making Lugia seem more powerful.
@justinn8541akaDrPokemon9 ай бұрын
Or the Gyrados Paradox. Where the flying type makes no sense, had the opportunity like magemite and mageton to change type in gen 2, but only got that change during mega evolution.
@IDK-y1n9 ай бұрын
and the palkia paradox
@marsphoenix13598 ай бұрын
I like the idea that Charizard is just so over joyed by the power of flight that it practically never lands and just flies *everywhere* hence it having the flying type, not dragon.
@vaughnalexander328 ай бұрын
I think that is more like the Bagon line..
@marsphoenix13598 ай бұрын
@@vaughnalexander32 Wing buddies
@DanielMWJ7 ай бұрын
Dodrio: "Not even going to mention me? Even though I can Fly without visible wings? Alright, fine."
@beyondawesomegaming35172 ай бұрын
Golerk: “at least you’re flying type. I canonically fly using rockets in my boots in multiple gen 5 movies and can learn the move fly but I don’t even get access to levitate.”
@beyondawesomegaming35172 ай бұрын
Also doduo and Dodrio in cannon Pokédex eateries in the anime have stated they could always fly but they prefer to run because they’re faster running than flying.
@justinjyeung9 ай бұрын
I like how it feels like this video came about because Mikey was doing research on which Pokemon should be allowed in Team Sky but aren't Flying-type, and then eventually dug deeper to find the root of the discrepancy (categorization of types based on element or anatomy) XD
@obits39 ай бұрын
To make things more complicated, the latest DLC challenges the player to “Take a picture of a Pokémon in flight.” Nearly anything levitating, including Geodude, counts.
@rokkraljkolesa93178 ай бұрын
what the fu
@BajajFamily-gv9ihАй бұрын
Pokemon snap
@kingillager8 ай бұрын
“Empoleon with fly would make sense” lmao
@zyxey8 ай бұрын
0:40 "But since mega evolution is gone..." Poorly aged in the best way.
@rawtrout0078 ай бұрын
What happened? Did they bring it back???
@Mago-Soul-Gaming8 ай бұрын
Yes it is back
@wanderingmercurymarauder7618 ай бұрын
@@Mago-Soul-Gaming But not in the main games. It never stopped being a thing in the spin off games.
@numsei-92918 ай бұрын
@@rawtrout007 Let's just say that... Pokémon Z-A is the GOAT
@TaniahTudor8 ай бұрын
Ikr
@snehilhamal13229 ай бұрын
"It technically fit the definition of paradox but it sound really cool" is the best line for me in the video
@Caminopoi669 ай бұрын
Doesn’t*
@Davanthall8 ай бұрын
"Mega evolution is gone" Four days dude. Four days.
@lavieestbellexx9 ай бұрын
Man, the sponsor segments are always so seamless that I almost forget it's Mikey recording alone twice then putting it together. It feels like an organic conversation flowing. Awesome work dude!
@blixerthememer54659 ай бұрын
What do you mean they’re two completely different people /j
@TheBeastlySort029 ай бұрын
But they're two separate people????
@semihozen2389 ай бұрын
Dw guys he knows Mikey and Grunty are different. It’s just he’s talking about how the camera angle changes on times it shouldn’t, so he thought they are having the same argument twice so that Mikey can record Grunty’s lines as well. That’s what you meant, riiiiight?
@IAmMissingnoMaster9 ай бұрын
It's clearly two completely different people, what are you talking about? (no but really, I 1,000% agree, Mikey is super skilled. This is legit the only channel I watch where I actively look forward to the sponsored segments)
@CRios259 ай бұрын
@@IAmMissingnoMasterwhat about Daniel Thrasher
@michaelserwetnyk16079 ай бұрын
14:26 You could also argue for ghost as an additional acceptable typing for parasect, given that the mushroom is in full control. It basically means that the “bug” portion is more akin to like a zombie.
@gabriellockwood27809 ай бұрын
Paras - Bug/Grass Parasect - Ghost/Grass Eh?
@slavibg25259 ай бұрын
@@gabriellockwood2780ghost grass parasect would be cool tbh and it'd make more sense
@thenerdbeast73759 ай бұрын
Or a dark type due to the sinister nature of the mushroom.
@dekumidoriya29288 ай бұрын
Did we actually have a zombie pokemon before ? Couldn't remember
@nicholaslienandjaja181511 сағат бұрын
And not all Ghost Pokemon are spirits of the dead. Some are actually nature spirits/elementals.
@skulleagle4178 ай бұрын
The whole steel not creating anything but there is the physical move magnet bomb
@WhiteRaven6969 ай бұрын
To be fair, Charizard is part of the Dragon Egg Group. Doesn’t matter if it’s not Dragon type, it’s still a Dragon. (And so are Arbok, Gyarados, Sceptile, Seviper, Milotic, Scrafty, Heliolisk, Salazzle and Sandaconda)
@Lupinemancer879 ай бұрын
I think that has to do with the fact that the concept of a Dragon in Japan is different then what we use in the West. For example, Ryū is Japanese for "dragon" and can be found in the Japanese term for "dinosaur", kyōryū. Meaning a Dragon in Japan is basically just a giant reptile, hence why most Dragon-type Pokemon are just that, giant reptiles. Could explain why so many reptile Pokemon are in the Dragon Egg Category despite not being dragons. The reason why Charizard isn't a Dragon-type despite being clearly Dragon-like is because it's main charactaristic, is that it's a flying fire creature, hence the Fire/Flying types. It's the same reason why Serperior is also not a Dragon-type despite being reptile in appearence. It's basically just a living vine that looks like a snake.
@majesticgothitelle18029 ай бұрын
Dragons is a shoe in for the reptile type and magic too.
@kbeatzgonecrazy9 ай бұрын
@@Lupinemancer87 It seems like Pokemon has a way different perspective towards 'Flying' and 'Dragon' types that we cannot find out yet. According to my point of view, 'Dragon' types are either dragon-like (Rayquaza), Gigantic (Alolan Exeggutor), Reptilian (Tyrantrum) or Mythic-looking (Flapple) creatures. While 'Flying' type is probably about 'controlling the air' rather than 'being a bird' or 'having wings' since it can be applied to Dodrio, Minior, etc.
@TheTakato1229 ай бұрын
@@kbeatzgonecrazy Alolan Exeggutor is solely the result of a pun.
@Guster___9 ай бұрын
@@TheTakato122 Yeah, the only thing connecting it to the type is its origin of a shapeshifting dragon
@SantaClawsYT9 ай бұрын
I remember telling my dad(who isn't into Pokemon but his favourite was Charizard) that I made a charizard in real life when I was eight. I'd put a neon light on the tail of a toy lizard.
@feeferkeefer9 ай бұрын
Aww so wholesome.
@HackerDragon99999 ай бұрын
But that's Charmander
@johnkiggs1089 ай бұрын
@@HackerDragon9999nah, charmander is a salamander.. that's weak against water
@SantaClawsYT9 ай бұрын
@@HackerDragon9999 I put no wings to annoy my dad because they were his favorite part of the design
@alvarocorreacesarsantos2 ай бұрын
*Dude, that's amazing.*
@RaptorBrain6 ай бұрын
I genuinely love this video. It feels so similar to your older videos but with the flair you’ve developed as your channel has grown. Your channel has inspired me to start thinking about making my own videos about Pokémon (and other stuff) but this video pushed me enough to actually start.
@JerginBootwyler8 ай бұрын
Mikey: "Mega evolution is gone" Pokemon Legends Z-A: "are you sure about that?"
@hananaltair35638 ай бұрын
Lol😂
@wlkrcodm44903 ай бұрын
Wdym???
@noahdavila82043 ай бұрын
@@wlkrcodm4490Mega evolution is coming back in the new pokemon game, shown by the mega evolution symbol at the end of the trailer
@endimo50193 ай бұрын
@@wlkrcodm4490 the new pokemon game, mega evolution is coming back
@sylvy168 ай бұрын
9:00 as someone who knows about celtic mythology, hearing that “fae-adjacent creatures are kind hearted” is just so funny to me.
@JackBond12348 ай бұрын
Even not knowing anything about celtic mythology, fairy type pokemon never seem presented as "kind hearted". More like mischievous and unsettling despite a saccharine demeanor.
@theantagonist8018 ай бұрын
@@JackBond1234 _Points to Hatenna_ Or just straight up violent.
@DakuGamer988 ай бұрын
@@theantagonist801 ever heard about tinkaton?
@theantagonist8018 ай бұрын
@@DakuGamer98 Honestly, I think Tinkaton is the only PokéDex entry that states "yes, it purposefully attacks this Pokémon out of spite and anger at the world." (Paraphrased, of course.)
@oger52008 ай бұрын
Kingdra may be able to use its body to create high pressure systems, its dex states "yawning of this Pokémon creates spiraling ocean currents." and Suicune represents the north wind, kinda make sense to control as well. As for Whimsicott, not sure best i got is they are little airbenders, in on dex it says They appear along with whirlwinds, maybe their making them?
@farhanbinrabbani46279 ай бұрын
"We have known since the 90's that it's under the Celadon Game Corner" Man it goes hard xD
@woopman7299 ай бұрын
they literally let a 10yr old beat everyone there including their boss
@Planetmango489 ай бұрын
Yeah.
@UnkownWonders9 ай бұрын
@@woopman729 that's the reason why they didn't return in the second generation in the games. They just couldn't recover from this massive loss
@aslidisbudak21089 ай бұрын
I was so confused when it was announced to be male
@shachargold68969 ай бұрын
Mickey- "Mammals are warm blooded and have live births" Platypus: *heavy breathing sounds*
@Popanimates9 ай бұрын
DOO BEE DOO BE DO BAH
@Choco_paz9 ай бұрын
"there are more intricacies to this, but you get the picture"
@eeveequeenhanna9 ай бұрын
Don’t forget echidnas.
@legion40229 ай бұрын
A Platypus? Put's on Agent head Perry the platypus!
@RajaniIsa9 ай бұрын
But they also nurse.
@BrandonTheOne28 ай бұрын
I love mikeys progression from being enemys with grunty boi to sometimes being freinds and sometimes being enemies to being friends to geeking out about sponsors
@gamexpert19909 ай бұрын
12:11 True, it's extremely specific and not likely to happen very often, but there's already been coding in the games for *exactly* such a trio-type combo since Gen 6. Use Gourgeist's signature move, Trick-Or-Treat, on a Heracross or such, and voila! You now have temporary access to a Bug/Fighting/Ghost Pokémon. (Although this particular setup is not availavle in Gen 9, similar trio-types can be made by adding the Grass type instead, using Trevenant's signature move, Forest's Curse, which actually is still in Gen 9.)
@Redwolf24959 ай бұрын
And there's also Golurk, who is constantly shown being capable of flight in the anime via jet boosters and in the games it can learn Fly via TM.
@FriskTemmieGoogle7 ай бұрын
I have never seen you before this video and I'm not really a pokemon fan but I gotta say: great video. It was really well structured, the pace was not too fast, but not too slow and you went from point A to B with the required stops so people that don't understand a lot about pokemon could enjoy the video. Thanks, really.
@lawrence98068 ай бұрын
"But since mega evolutions are gone..." Well, that aged rather well. Maybe even as well as the milk I left sitting in the basement for four years, lol.
@ethans93798 ай бұрын
Enjoy your cheese
@J0RD4N_D3V1L4 ай бұрын
was it miltank's milk?
@chimeragenesis3618 ай бұрын
16:10 these three have the added issue that storywise, they're spirits of previously deepsea creatures, so Water could also make sense for them.
@definitivamenteno-malo79198 ай бұрын
Evolution (not ingame that is basically metamorphosis, but actual evolution), could be the answer: Charizard is a recently evolved reptile that hasn't adapted enough to have a different type than Fire, and can't get rid of Flying type to have its wings functional. The other option, is thst maybe it was Fire-Dragon like Turtonator, but given the evolutionary circumstances, the growing of wings and the capacity of air control that gives Flying type, was better suited for their recently developed wings. And still haven't even started video haha
@starbuckr53818 ай бұрын
"birds are warm blooded and lay eggs" *stares in platypus and echidna*
@supersonicmario568 ай бұрын
Ah, The Monotremes....
@rokkraljkolesa93178 ай бұрын
"Behold, a bird!" -Diogenes
@donaldbaird784913 күн бұрын
Featherless biped
@dragonmasterjoe7248 ай бұрын
“They can’t move water with their mind” Short horned lizard: allow me to introduce my blood bending
@donladplaysgames40368 ай бұрын
An interesting discussion I have 2 points though, one minor and one major: 1. I think the triangle of super effective elements against each other was the wrong direction for the Pokemon franchise to take as in Red/Blue I always saw the starter as a choice of Easy/Medium/Hard in that by Lt Surge you could catch a Diglett or Geodude before then and be sorted for the battle however for Misty you either needed to catch a Pikachu in Viridian forest or chosen Bulbasaur to get past her (The easy choice) and for Brock you had to deal with neutral damage or have Squirtle (Medium) or Bulbasaur as your starter whereas Charmander was always the tough choice to get through. 2. Kingdra casting hurricane makes sense since creating a Whirlpool for a water type doesn't seem that big a deal and with enough energy and momentum that could be turned into a full blown hurricane, it's more that hurricane should be a dual type attack and not that it's weird a water type could create it
@carrotpatch58289 ай бұрын
The scrapped BIRD type in Gen 1 is starting to make a lot more sense…😂
@theprinceofawesomeness6 ай бұрын
It was scraped because Normal/Flying was perfect to describe a bird
@nicholaslienandjaja181511 сағат бұрын
Not all Flying types are birds (or have wings), just like not all Dragon types are dragons and not all Ghost types are spirits of the dead.
@Xeldum1199 ай бұрын
1:59 I could 100% see blastoise as a rock type
@LetsTalkSports0018 ай бұрын
I personally would have made it water/steel because of Blastoise's cannons.
@Xeldum1198 ай бұрын
That’s also cool.
@matthewkuscienko46168 ай бұрын
@LetsTalkSports001 It's also worth noting that Blastoise can learn flash cannon by level up (I think it needs the move reminder for that one)
@theantagonist8018 ай бұрын
Grass/Poison, Fire/Dragon, Water/Rock
@DS-tv2fi8 ай бұрын
Yeah, like a regional form that’s based on land based turtles/tortoises or something.
@halyoalex89428 ай бұрын
I would love to see some sort of follow-up video to this/"what if pokemon had Earth-type" where you split and combine pokemon types to make a "more" "logical" type chart.
@pokemaster219 ай бұрын
This reminds me of your early days, the Pokemon Talk, and What happens in a Pokeball days. You've come full circle, and I have nothing but respect for you, as my favorite Poketuber. Heres to years to come, and Go Team Sky! Thanks Mikey, for making my childhood so good so far. Edit: Your classification based on avatar and manipulations makes a lot of sense. I've heard less specific theories and was confued on how you would manipulate a bug. Now thinking again, i think he talked extra long about flying types for a reason....*cough cough*....team sky.....
@ProTRK-we1ke9 ай бұрын
2:55 technically it fits the definition of a type 5 paradox which is defined as “someone on the internet getting something wrong and being confused about it”. I know that our glorious leader Mickey would never be confused about something like this but others have so it counts
@williamjones53349 ай бұрын
I was thinking it also arises from a type 2 paradox (unanswerable question) - the designers have to answer the question "what fits this Pokemon better: flying or dragon?", but there is no answer, because it's a flying dragon. But yeah, the fact that Charizard doesn't have dragon type is probably type 5, because there is an answer you can point to, that some people just don't realise.
@gabriellockwood27809 ай бұрын
@@williamjones5334 Charizard is a salamander. So realistically, it should be Ground-Type, since salamanders live on the ground.
@robertw.hewitt74658 ай бұрын
I think Slither Wing, Flutter Mane, or Iron Moth could also be flying. Slither Wing has wing in its name, Flutter Mane can flutter, and Iron Moth has weird robo-wings
@THEW0LFB0Y9 ай бұрын
"Not all Dragons are Dragon-Type." -Lance
@cesarhernandez68619 ай бұрын
Facts.
@remhauck15779 ай бұрын
Lance just can't accept that he's actually a bird keeper.
@ThePkmnYPerson9 ай бұрын
That just raises the question of what a dragon is in the Pokémon world. It's like if he had said that not all cats are Normal type. He shouldn't know that word.
@SkareKrow233 ай бұрын
Charizard and Gyarados are the only pokemon (in Lance's party) covered by his statement. The best Aerodactyl can hope for is to be called a wyvern!
@UncleLincolnАй бұрын
@@remhauck1577hahaha
@Huhneee8 ай бұрын
0:43 "Since mega evolution is gone" pokemon presents: ackshually...
@Pink-Lemons8 ай бұрын
yep
@calheaven7 ай бұрын
Great video again! I've been watching for a few years now and your video quality just gets better and better, I had literal chills when you brought it a back around to say just like Charizard at the end!
@eesev20178 ай бұрын
Saying this in a separate comment because it was the point of the other one, but Dark does not have a “darkness” aspect, it’s just the “Evil” type. All of the moves are (purely) related to mischief or sinister intentions, even Dark Pulse.
@kxndela6 ай бұрын
haha get it? pure-ly? haha! your mom must be the infidelity type!
@TheAwesomeTruthofTT9 ай бұрын
Basically, it’s that old 3 pick 2 situation… no matter how hard you try you are gonna miss out. My grandpa used to work as a contractor and he would tell this to his clients. You can have your project done cheep fast or quality but you can only pick two Cheep and Fast = Poor Quality Cheep and Quality= Slow Fast and Quality = Expensive. But you can never have all 3…
@shadenox81648 ай бұрын
Except in this case dragon was never considered, it's clearly supposed to be a winged lizard.
@CircleWedge6 ай бұрын
Cheap* Cheep is a bird sound, like peep.
@Xavazorn6 ай бұрын
man, the second he started ranting about the last airbender, i thought everything had finally caught up to him XD
@krisrainbow23509 ай бұрын
I have always loved Charizard. Its the first pokemon I ever got to Level 100 without a gameshark. I felt so accomplished.
@IDKovers9 ай бұрын
Petition to have all pokemon listed at 15:48 to be allowed in Team Sky
@DodgyBird9 ай бұрын
Watch this idea blow up and make Charizard Paradox a common thing
@whipedgeАй бұрын
i think they could have added a move called lift off for non flying types that can fly similar to magnet rise.
@mjvdg41949 ай бұрын
This is somewhat tangential, but my worry with the fairy type was that it’d be fully related to physiognomy. I’m so glad that it expanded (Grimsnarl and Mimikyu being examples) since I’ve always loved all fae legends to death and am so glad they have reasonably thoughtful inclusion!
@SondaroSasuke8 ай бұрын
11:28 you gotta love how in this situation Gyarados makes absolutely no sense other than "it flies because Chineese mythos". It can't fly canonically (not counting the flying Gyarados in Legends:Arceus), it can't learn Fly, it can't manipulate wind other than specifically learning Hurricane (and I still can't wrap around my head over how that works) and it's DEFINITELY not a bird. You call this the Charizard Paradox, but I'm gonna go with the Gyarados Dilemma 😂
@RenewedRS8 күн бұрын
Gyarados can fly canonically and why would you dismiss a demonstration of it flying in a game lmao
@kittentamer21648 ай бұрын
Types are related to Typed Energy. This is canon. It's a soft magic system, and not literally what they are. Fire Type moves are not quite literal fire. It's Typed energy with Fire-Like properties. Same reason how Ponyta can burn something they want, yet magically choose not to burn something. So types are really just what energy a Pokemon has flowing through them. Being capable of Flight does not make you a Flying Type. Having a lot of Flying Type Energy, as Typed energy, within you makes you Flying Type. You can also lose access to a type, or have your type change completely.
@inderdeepsingh54988 ай бұрын
I don't watch your videos super often (just don't have much time to watch youtube anymore) but I used to watch all the time when I was younger. This style of video is definitely super interesting and I really liked this video! I agree with people saying it feels kinda like a Pokemon Professor explaining things, and its really good!
@alaricsavage72238 ай бұрын
"Now that mega evolution is gone" That really didn't age well 😭
@JacobSmith-xt5lq5 ай бұрын
'Mega is gone' Legends Z-A: "ARE YOU SURE ABOUT THAT"
@ThePkmnYPerson9 ай бұрын
Every flight Pokémon that's not a Flying Type be like - "Arceus! I don't need to be identified by something I happen to do! You don't see me saying you should be called a Video Making Type Human."
@JCThe14th9 ай бұрын
4:44 god I love Grunty Boi
@ChristopherCapersJonesАй бұрын
2:13 I LOVE that design.
@dhayes51438 ай бұрын
About half way through this vid, delving into the problem of Flying type, and I have to say this a great analysis. Clear, robust, and not just doing whatever you feel like with an arbitrary classification but really trying to drill down into what this all really means. Great stuff.
@aquamarinerose54058 ай бұрын
Also though I'm sure you're going to mention it later, but Dragon is ALSO a middle-ground type, seeing just how many moves in the type are centered around a sort of arcane dragon energy that's mechanically and elementally distinct from Fire or similar forms of energy.
@faustinomacarronesasados87663 ай бұрын
Yeah thats actually true, Dragon Dance , dragon breath , draco meteor… It is much more than being an angry reptile
@daim.024 ай бұрын
Ground would work amazing for blastoise… he’s a tortoise/turtle, animals that leave in the water AND ON LAND Besides that would fit perfectly with the rest of the starters. Venusaurs poison wouldn’t work anymore since ground is immune to it, but grass would hit X4. If charizard stayed fire flying, water>fire and Flying>Ground
@spongebobandthomasfanatic22533 ай бұрын
Actually ground resists poison
@gamingmudkip50309 ай бұрын
some more I found Celebi Scizor Heracross Garchomp Lunala Buzzwole Quaxly(Should be like the rowlet line where the final evo loses the flying type) Sirfetch'd(Has wings sure it's holding a lot) Pecharunt(Can't tell if those are wings) Dunsparce/ Dudunsparce ( Don't know if those wings are big enough) Sheninja (Can't tell if those wings could move) Druddigon (Can't tell if wings move) Tapu koko (Based off a bird and has small wings, would put other tapus but they aren't based off of birds
@NotHydrex_9 ай бұрын
15:55 whyd Mikey sound like he's doing the pokerap 😂
@pokemfan9515 ай бұрын
So much for this being a video where we dunk on Charizard's existence.
@ShiMusume8 ай бұрын
I imagine the best reason Pokemon could give in lore due to types is: A pokemon's assigned type is given based on what seems effective and not effective against the pokemon. This would imply researchers could have spent a lot of time just having pokemon hit others with various attacks and writing down the results. However... that would be a little grim for the pokemon universe even if that is what we often do in games to learn (without looking up some type chart)
@eesev20178 ай бұрын
Where does Dark actually have “control over “darkness””? Dark Void is really the only one like that and it just induces sleep. Dark Pulse is “bad thoughts” not “darkness.”
@ErikaCartet8 ай бұрын
yeah, this is a bit of a translation issue. it’s called あく(悪/aku)type in japanese, which basically means evil or wicked. dark type isn’t actual darkness/absence of light, but more a symbolic darkness of its nature. like someone committing a crime at night not because they’re elementally attuned to shadows, but because they get up to no good under the cover of darkness. it’s all about dirty tactics, intimidation, obfuscation, retribution, and tormenting the opponent. there’s maybe a little overlap with literal darkness with a few very specific moves, which would make sense - literal darkness being used to symbolize evil etc etc, but it’s definitely more a nature/fighting style thing more than an elemental energy thing. which it sounds like you already know, but just providing some extra context for anyone else scrolling the comments.
@FrostFire4258 ай бұрын
Umbreon is the most obvious example. It represents the night
@nicholaslienandjaja181511 сағат бұрын
@@ErikaCartetAlso, most Dark-type Pokemon are actually based on animals and mythical creatures often portrayed as evil in mythology and fiction or stereotypical criminals.
@SwagnerCountsThings8 ай бұрын
I'm a firm believer that there used to be more "anatomical" types in the early game design. Most notably beast, fish, and bird. Which is why we have so many normal/flying types. They were all supposed to be normal/birds to contrast the legendary elemental ones and make them seem even more powerful. Tinfoil hat still on, this is why rock and ground were two separate types, because rock was the anatomical type and ground was the element type. In this tinfoil hat Charizard, Gyarados, Aerodactyl were all supposed to have dragon as the second type(flying had yet to be established) and Dragonite was a pure flying type. Then at some point, maybe they were trying to curtail how powerful Charizard, Gyarados, and Aerodactyl were since they were all easily obtained early on, or maybe they were trying to save space, or maybe simplify the already complex type chart, they created flying type, gave it to all the dragons (dropping the dragon type from the 3 that were already dual type) changed the birds to flying, and stuck it on every other monotype that had wings i.e. Butterfree, Zubat, Golbat, scyther. Since all the fish types were water they just dropped that type completely (tough cookies Chi-Yu) and beast type probably didn't have any remaining meaningful interaction so it was canned. Again though that is with a tinfoil hat, so take those thoughts with a grain of salt
@jaschabull23657 ай бұрын
From what I recall hearing, dragon type was apparently tacked on to dragonite to make Lance's team a tougher challenge at the end of the game. Maybe that's why nothing else in gen 1 gets it.
@GoatlyGoat9 ай бұрын
I feel like I learned something and nothing all at the same time and enjoyed every second of it
@joeydk8 ай бұрын
You could see it as the pokemon types not representing what powers a pokemon CAN use, but more what powers a pokemon PREFERS to use. Regular charizard could be mostly relying on its fire power combined with aerial combat styles, while mega charizard X taps into the inherent draconic powers that charizard possesses. It would also explain why a pokemon can learn moves from types it doesn't have, while getting STAB for moves of the same type as it is more experienced in using these types of moves.
@PinkaholicOfficial2 ай бұрын
Gyarados whose only flying STAB is mf Bounce:
@GrugGangGrugGangАй бұрын
@@PinkaholicOfficial Gyarados loves trampolines more than anything, obviously.
@catkook5438 ай бұрын
3:46 Actuallllllllllllllly That's how animals used to be categorized and by used to, I mean before your grandparents were born modern species are categorized based off of species family trees. All the felines had a common ancestor all the canines had a common ancestor dolphins and whales are categorized as mammals even though they swim under water and cant go on land platypuses lay eggs even though they're a mammal
@thenoobygamer90009 ай бұрын
11:36 There was actually going to be a typing for birds, specifically in Gen 1, but was ultimately changed and put with the flying type since there wasn't that many bird pokemon then. However, if you take that into consideration for his analysis on the flying type, it makes it make a lot more sense. You can see what they just threw in with the flying type at this point as well.
@MDoorpsy8 ай бұрын
This is very odd reasoning, since at the time there was also only 1 ghost line (Gengar) and 1 dragon line (Dragonite), yet many more bird Pokemon, even some that it wouldn't make sense to be flying, like Dodrio, leading to the meme of it flying by flapping its heads. In fact, there are more 'bird' Pokemon lines in gen 1 (7 total) than there are bug lines (6, though Kabutops and Omastar could arguably count if they weren't fossils).
@thenoobygamer90008 ай бұрын
@@MDoorpsy I honestly agree with that, but space was also limited for those games, and it uses as much as it can while cutting anything unessesary. So, making a category for birds and flying pokemon could be seen as unessary and take up data that can be used for other things(especially with type advantages and potential extra moves because of it being an official part of it). They should have brought back the idea in the games they made afterward since the device could handle the extra data, and there were even more bird like pokemon added. That is an amazing meme with Doduo though 🤣
@MDoorpsy8 ай бұрын
@@thenoobygamer9000 The more likely reason is just that they realized some of their cool dragon designs would be too broken if they were dragon type, and so created the flying type specifically so they could give it to Charizard and Gyarodos instead of dragon.
@thenoobygamer90008 ай бұрын
@MDoorpsy saying that they made the flying type specifically for Gyarodos and Charizard is a lot less likely since that game actually needed a few more dragon types. I would think they gave Charizard flying instead of dragon since it is a starter pokemon, and none have been dragon type(unless they introduced it in scarlet/violet). Especially when there is a lot of "flying" pokemon and "bird" pokemon that are the same, so they would be a "flying bird" pokemon, which is redundant if you have flying, which is more versatile as well(until they introduced levitate and severly underutilized the flying aspect that it can give).
@MDoorpsy8 ай бұрын
@@thenoobygamer9000 Dragon was originally intended to be the strongest type in the game, so Charizard as a starter would have been broken if it had it. Gyarados couldn't be dragon because they didn't want the player to have a dragon type with good stats at level 20, and grinding a Magikarp to level 50 like Dragonite would have been too much to ask of players.
@TheReviewer658 ай бұрын
The restraint on you to not say "Team Sky" despite saying "Flying" so much, you have my respect
@aj230138 ай бұрын
Solution? Give Charizard an ability that effectively gives him stab with dragon moves. Makes everyone happy. Could be called something like "draconic ancestry". Think it works?
@shadenox81648 ай бұрын
Or maybe just some people need to accept charizard was never a dragon?
@Lilith_owo8 ай бұрын
I know that irl the way Pokémon’s get their typing is based on a mix between gameplay, and design (appearance, story, powers). But I feel like within the logic of the Pokemon universe what has always made sense to me is that typing is a classification based on powers, abilities, elemental control, and egg groups is a classification more similar to irl taxonomy or phylogeny based on genetic relationships and anatomy.
@jaschabull23657 ай бұрын
Yeah, I figured the same. We might ask what makes one fire-breathing felid apparently normal while another fire-breathing felid doesn't qualify as normal, but likely to a pokémon professor, it's simply a matter of "litleo is better at pouncing and roaring violently than litten is, while litten is susceptible to ghost-type attacks, unlike litleo, so litleo, unlike litten, is normal-type". Still doesn't quite explain why before it's used a specific move, magnemite takes a quadruple damage from earthquake, despite its constantly floating in the air.
@maygirl15959 ай бұрын
I love the way Mikey thinks, this new video style is AWESOME! It scratched an itch in my brain that I didn’t know was itchy! 😅🤣💙💙
@ChemicalXII3 ай бұрын
"Fine, I'll do it myself: Charizard is and has always been a fire, dragon, flying type. - Godzilla & The Dragon Association (chairman: Toothless).".
@V.B.T.G8 ай бұрын
So about Mega Evolutions being gone….
@austinmccormick89529 ай бұрын
Grunty Boi acting like not everyone knows about the hideout is amazing
@EternalKhann3 ай бұрын
I don't care. Make Blastoise water/dragon, Venusaur leaf/dragon, but give Charizard the goddamn Dragon type it deserved.
@Agent-Happy3 ай бұрын
New regional variants; visual true versions
@tomasturbando98362 ай бұрын
Blastoise water/fairy and maintain poison/grass venusaur
@aidenharper60132 ай бұрын
Or just give Blastoise the rock or ground type. I dont understand why he said they dont make sense, thats literally the secondary typing for half the turtles.
@uvuvwevwevweonyetenyevweug34502 ай бұрын
@aidenharper6013 right. Some tortoises live underground so it makes sense
@KingFurgo8 ай бұрын
3:57 So a Platypus is a bird? Neat
@mouthwaterin8 ай бұрын
All birds are warm blooded and lay eggs, warm blooded egg laying animals are not all birds
@macfine8 ай бұрын
" there are more intricacies to this " yes you are very smart. There are exceptions to these generalities. Going on a tangent on all of them like monotremes wasn't the point of the video.
@dattromboneguy8 ай бұрын
"Since Mega evolution is gone"... if he had just waited 4 days more, this statement would be true"
@Tsukisuthe18 ай бұрын
True as soon as the video was released for Pokemon legends z my friend spammed me with excitement
@charizardking1274Ай бұрын
I’m sure if Charizard became a dragon type in the next pokemon game, the community would go from “This guy loves Charizard!? What a simp!” To “Day 58, the Charizards have become sentient, they started to know my name.” Basically, dragon type Charizard would be too powerful
@Oceane18039 ай бұрын
11:43 And a Bird type. *cough cough*
@-BenGaming-9 ай бұрын
“Ground and rock would never make sense for blastoise” Bro HE GOTTA HUGE SHELL ON HIS BACK 😂😂😂
@Pokemazda9 ай бұрын
And the shell on its back has to do WHAT with Ground or Rock?
@darkdragon72109 ай бұрын
Rock in Gen 1 Steel in Gen 2 & onwards
@Pokemazda9 ай бұрын
@@darkdragon7210 a Shell is not a rock?? What are you two talking about?
@Vary1809 ай бұрын
@@Pokemazda shell is made of bone not rock, but marowak has bone moves which are ground type so it could work. also, other shelled pokemon like omanyte and kabuto are rock water types.
@yorecf96419 ай бұрын
@@Vary180we've also got Carracosta, an ancient turtle who is a water/rock type.
@JoniZhask8 ай бұрын
"Ghost are physically ghost", mikey just created another paradox on its own 🤣🤣
@dansattah8 ай бұрын
Tradititionally? Yes. In Pokemon Type history? NO! Originally, most Ghost Type moves were status moves, but it had one more Physical attack than Special ones, so Ghost stayed a Physical type until Gen 4.
@KawiiDino8 ай бұрын
"Mega evolution is gone" *four days later*
@ianvandijk8409 ай бұрын
Mikey, it's a good video with clear explanations, but I think the reason why Charizard is a fire/flying type is much simpler. If Charizard had become a dragon type in Gen 1, it would mean that it would be mega overpowered. In Gen 1, dragon types had only two weaknesses, ice and other dragon types. Since the Dratini line are the only dragon types in Gen 1, you would need a Dragonite to stand a chance against Charizard. However, if Charizard were also a dragon type, it would mean it could also take out that Dragonite before you do that with Charizard. Then you have the ice types, the problem with them is the fact that they are weak against fire types. With this, they would also have little chance against Charizard, the only Pokémon that might have a chance could be Dewgong but for the rest very few. The reason Charizard is a fire/flying type is simply to maintain balance in the games. With Charizard as a fire/flying type, you have access to multiple Pokémon that can take on Charizard. That's I think the main reason Charizard didn't become a fire/dragon type. PS, you forgot Garchomp as a Pokémon with wings but without the levitate ability.
@charizardpropaganda8 ай бұрын
In gen 1, fire/dragon Charizard would be weak to ice type because fire didn't resist ice back then. And Blastoise can learn ice type moves so it wouldn't be an issue in gen 1. It's a different story in gen 1 remakes though.
@rokkraljkolesa93178 ай бұрын
Garchomp is an especially weird one, because while they are used as wings, it makes more sense for them to simply be find, as the Gible line are sand _sharks_
@jeffreygao39568 ай бұрын
And that’s why Fire should resist Ice!
@the_top_comment5 ай бұрын
ground could work for blastoise because it's on the ground
@madnessarcade74479 ай бұрын
Lance: you don’t have to be dragon type to be a dragon just need to have the heart of one 0:21
@AceFaz8 ай бұрын
It can BE a Dragon, Without having the Dragon Type.
@pixelatedsethtube12718 ай бұрын
Literally it can not
@AceFaz8 ай бұрын
@@pixelatedsethtube1271 The Typing generally refers to the Energy that the Pokemon can harness, Like fire pokemon, can harness Fire. Dragon Pokemon, can harness Dragon Energy. Not Everything that LOOKS Like a dragon, can harness Dragon Energy. Therefore, it can be a dragon without being a Dragon Type.
@pixelatedsethtube12718 ай бұрын
@@AceFaz ah fair enough and good point 👍
@arcticbanana668 ай бұрын
@@pixelatedsethtube1271 During the "Pokémon Masters EX" New Years 2021 event you could find Lance wearing a Gyarados kimono, and one of his random dialogue lines is: "This outfit shows off Gyarados's power as a dragon! What's that, you say? Gyarados isn't a Dragon-type Pokémon? Haha, not all dragons are Dragon-type Pokémon!"
@shadenox81648 ай бұрын
Personally I think charizard is easy to explain, it's a winged lizard. Not a dragon.
@michaelkelleypoetry2 ай бұрын
I was born in 1989, so I remember when Pokemon first started and the frustration us initial pokemon fans had with Red, Blue, and Yellow when we found out our Charizard that had wings couldn't learn Fly because it was just Fire type. So, the blame may be partly due to our complaints. We got Charizard's secondary Flying type added before there was a Dragon type.
@Bothrops_Asper_892 ай бұрын
Charizard being capable of learning Fly was corrected in Yellow, though.
@oepalu2 ай бұрын
That doesn't make any sense. Charizard was already a Flying type in Red and Blue even though it couldn't learn Fly so nobody got the Flying type added to Charizard, it always had it. Nevermind doing so before Dragon type existed as as Dragon type also existed in Red and Blue, "before there was a Dragon type" is just before Pokemon existed.
@michaelkelleypoetry2 ай бұрын
@@oepalu No, in Red and Blue Charizard was just a single Fire type. It didn't have any secondary typing.
@oepalu2 ай бұрын
@@michaelkelleypoetry You are definitely wrong. I am replaying Pokemon Blue at the moment and after just checking Charizard is absolutely Fire/Flying. From googling it seems some people misremember dual types not existing in Gen 1 and there are even rumors of somebody selling a version of those games where dual types aren't included but if that is the case it's only a mistake somebody made when trying to copy/fake Red and Blue. In short if you have a copy of Red or Blue where Charizard is a pure Fire type it is almost certainly a fake.
@jasco.gaming8 ай бұрын
"But since Mega Evolution is gone..." Boy did that age poorly hahaha
@MirageUchiha8 ай бұрын
Whatchu mean? Rock could work for Blastoise. Lol It's shell is hard like a rock. 😂
@shadenox81648 ай бұрын
Its a normal turtle shell, not made of rock.
@Only_SomeАй бұрын
Charizard was the first dragon to not be a dragon in the series
@dracoberry9 ай бұрын
Meanwhile, there's Iron moth and that jellyfish thing (Niheligo?), which are capable of levitating but have a double weakness to ground and can't have levitate due to their group's abilities. Conclusion: Iron moth is a non-iron moth which can't moth. (Why poison? I get that the materials for solar panels/ the ways to get them can be dangerous, but still, why not flying?) Niheligo isn't often used for a reason, and it's not because of its stats. (You could tell anyone, who doesn't know wth is this, that it is a water and electric/poison, even a Flying type pokemon and they could believe you, But rock poison just seems absurd)
@rokkraljkolesa93178 ай бұрын
I found one explanation for Iron Moth but I'm not too happy with it: solar radiation