Imagine you were an advisor to the Roman Empire in its final years. What strategies would you propose to prevent its fall in the West?
@Chuck444426 ай бұрын
Open your borders. Let young women n men flood in until White man is demea to 34% Then cause whity..only drops 1.4 kids, ( compared to migran).. repro rate 400%.. Gotz uz
@AnglandAlamehnaSwedish6 ай бұрын
Paulus was one of the generals who had to give up power after 1 week n get it back the next week, it made no progress.Get rid of the generals changing power every other week, that killed us n so many mercenaries turned on us
@RazielXT6 ай бұрын
Rejoin with East. Better to keep Rome in Roman empire than lose whole west. But people like Ricimer would never allow that.
@notmysteriousthief46296 ай бұрын
Complete overhaul, maybe a reversal to the societal collapse it experienced just before it well and truly collapsed geopolitically.
@martinkupka35756 ай бұрын
Roman empire fell due to wrong economic policy, corruption and greedy struggle for power among the wealthy caste. In it´s final few years, it was much too late to rescue the empire by some simple advises which could be easily fulfilled in short time. So my advise would have been: Run!
@miliba6 ай бұрын
Germanic Tribes are still migrating. Nowadays they mostly go to an island called Mallorca
@ericdanielski48026 ай бұрын
Absolutely nice joke. 😂
@b899766 ай бұрын
@@GARTEN-KATZEN-SACHSENLAND I don't get it
@Cleeon6 ай бұрын
@@GARTEN-KATZEN-SACHSENLAND the one who replaced other, will be replaced with another
@samiman56066 ай бұрын
@GARTENPARADIES-SACHSEN But at least if the Germans convert to Islam they get married a making alot of kids I know a white German man Muslim convert married a white German women convert and got 8 kids and he love and respect his wife so much and the same About her imagine if this German man his atheist and his wife she is a feminist they will never get married and they will never have kids Islam is allways the solution if you want the white Europeans make alot of kids with out Islam the white Europeans will get Extinction by red pill and feminism and lgbtq and atheism and liberal
@samiman56066 ай бұрын
@GARTENPARADIES-SACHSEN But at least if the Germans convert to Islam they get married a making alot of kids I know a white German man Muslim convert married a white German women convert and got 8 kids and he love and respect his wife so much and the same About her imagine if this German man his atheist and his wife she is a feminist they will never get married and they will never have kids Islam is allways the solution if you want the white Europeans make alot of kids with out Islam the white Europeans will get Extinction by red pill and feminism and lgbtq and atheism and liberal
@KingMordred6 ай бұрын
Historians usually agree that the massive immigration of barbarians to Roman territory was caused by an enormous drop in temperatures and Hunnic attacks. Therefore, it is safe to say that stirrups and lack of coats caused the fall of Rome.
@pbh816 ай бұрын
How much of a temperature drop?
@recoil535 ай бұрын
The Huns did not use the stirrup - neither grave finds nor Roman writings show any. It's not until the Avars came in the late 500's that the stirrup arrived in Europe, after the Western half of the Roman Empire fell.
@hcn67085 ай бұрын
@@pbh81 Enough to make Scandinavia suck to live in That was likely the motivation for the Goths to move to what is now Poland
@craezee2475 ай бұрын
@@pbh81enormous. Ostia Antica, the port city of Ancient Rome is nowadays 4km inland.
@marcodalu54945 ай бұрын
i agree on both as a matter of fact the map shows germanic people in the wrong place i guess visigoths were located in the balkans Ostrogoths were located East of them Huns invaded the land of the Ostrogoths, they pushed the Visigoths, who pushed into the empire the ruote from scandinavia was way larger than just trough Denmark we are talking about Finland and then southwards
@Nabonidus-m7x6 ай бұрын
"Germanic tribes are not sending us their best! They send us their criminals. Some I assume are good people."
@oneshothunter98776 ай бұрын
Quote from Trumpinius? 😀
@Nabonidus-m7x6 ай бұрын
@@oneshothunter9877 Trumpinius Maximus BILLIONS AND BILLIONS OF MAXIMI!
@argylemanni2806 ай бұрын
So did Rome fall or not?
@Nabonidus-m7x6 ай бұрын
@@argylemanni280 they wouldn't have fallen if orangey was around :(
@lost_porkchop6 ай бұрын
@@Nabonidus-m7xThey would have fallen even faster 😂
@TetsuShima6 ай бұрын
And all of this just because Tiberius said: "Who cares about stupid Germany?"
@TheBandit025Nova6 ай бұрын
Germanic Tribes: What did you say
@Trickaz946 ай бұрын
Germanic tribes: and I took that personally
@saguntum-iberian-greekkons70145 ай бұрын
Yeah. Germanicus begged to Tiberius “One more campaign, they are weak, it would the very last attack, germania will be subjugated and tamed” Tiberius: No! I want germans to invade us one day!
@davidwarburton29155 ай бұрын
Augustus was so smart in so many ways. He did a lot of things right. But he messed up his succession. Tiberius was a weird guy who governed like a weird guy. A pretty bad emperor all around.
@TetsuShima5 ай бұрын
@@davidwarburton2915 To be fair, Livia forced him to name Tiberius as his sucessor. Also, compared to Caligula and Nero, Tiberius was pretty decent
@theirishshane6 ай бұрын
Hundred and twenty million people sounds a bit to much for the western Roman empire
@fancyfact13896 ай бұрын
yea the area of modern day spain, portugal, france, italy had around 30 million
@primusIIV6 ай бұрын
did he say western specifically because he could have meant the entire empire
@HarryMonn6 ай бұрын
scholars generally accept the entire population of the empire never exceeded 75 million. So the Western half probably had 30-40 million. 120 million is 100% impossible.
@ChristiaanHW6 ай бұрын
i'm pretty sure they meant the whole Roman empire. so from Hadrian's wall to North Africa and from Morocco to Irak. and for all those territories 120 million sounds plausible.
@HarryMonn6 ай бұрын
@ChristiaanHW the world population at the time was around 180-200 million. China had 60-80 million at this time. So if Rome had 120 million then there would have to be almost nobody outside of Rome and China, which we know can't be true, seeing as India alone also had a very large population. Thus Rome couldn't have 120 million. Most academics say 75 million max.
@seanwebb6056 ай бұрын
If there wasn't enough land to farm in Germanic territory then why didn't they just go into IT and become coders?
@YarPirates-vy7iv5 ай бұрын
Market was saturated. They'd do better learning to repair elevators, but try getting a young person to want that!
@seanwebb6055 ай бұрын
@@YarPirates-vy7iv The odious Otis job?
@peabase5 ай бұрын
@@seanwebb605 Otis? More like Schindler, KONE or Thyssenkrupp.
@seanwebb6055 ай бұрын
@@peabase It's really tough to move up working for an elevator company.
@vetiarvind5 ай бұрын
becoming nazis was easier
@lethalbroccoli015 ай бұрын
"these germanic tribes shared many similiarities with the vikings as well." Am i missing something? "Vikings" are germanic already. Why did the video talk about vikings as if they werent germanic?
@ninototo15 ай бұрын
Right. I mean they literally came from the same place. It was the same people.
@ravinraven69132 ай бұрын
yea you're missing something...you're missing a youtube channel that does research and doesn't just say what the first story says. He didn't do any checking to make sure what he said was actually true... Germans were migrating long before the roman empire was even formed....look at why Caesar invaded Gaul....with this alone, it should have given pause to confirm that some of the things hes saying isn't true or accurate.
@cXms-k8yАй бұрын
@@ravinraven6913what's your source give the page number and line
@azelucy1798Ай бұрын
Not all germans are descendants of vikings
@artfasil28 күн бұрын
@@azelucy1798 Being a Viking was simply a profession, they were similar to modern marines, a land force brought by ships, the Norse are/were Germanic.
@christianeaster27766 ай бұрын
Looking for unpopulated land? The Roman empire was more densely populated than the lands they came from.
@Gingerichsauce4 ай бұрын
I think he was talking about the density of trees. France had cleared farm land already
@mikman72194 ай бұрын
@@Gingerichsauce But a cleared farm land is not fertile. Clearing trees and burning them creates a fertile land for a few years. Unless you have fertilizers.
@kevincousino22764 ай бұрын
That is just more slaves to work the land for them.
@ravinraven69132 ай бұрын
I don't think this guy did much research...the Germans were nomadic people long before the days of the roman empire. Look at the reason Julius Caesar invaded Gaul. It was because he claimed an invading army of germanic celts were moving in...the celts were actually one of the first road makers in europe. They have roads dating back to before the Roman era. So Caesar used it as an excuse to conquer Gaul. That alone should have been reason to change the name of this video, or at least be more specific because he doesn't talk about anything before the roman days...which he should have, theres a reason Italy was mostly empty when the greeks came in.
@heroedeleyenda052 ай бұрын
well to be fair, the land did become unpopulated once they ravaged trough it.
@ziqiding14936 ай бұрын
My favourite part is when the germanic tribes said "it's migratin' time" and proceeded to migrate all over the roman empire
@TheLionFarm6 ай бұрын
The Huns likely entered Western Asia shortly before 370, from Central Asia: they first conquered the Goths and the Alans, pushing a number of tribes to seek refuge within the Roman Empire. In the following years, the Huns conquered most of the Germanic and Scythian tribes outside of the borders of the Roman Empire.
@Max-wv1cu6 ай бұрын
@@TheLionFarmtotal bs. Never made it past the elbe, or to scandinavia
@Stephen-Montefinese6 ай бұрын
Especially after the Huns rode in and screamed “what up b*tches!?!?”
@Manuka-px2pe6 ай бұрын
Wrong, this doesn’t explain why norse tribes came from scandinavia to southern europe, it can’t be the huns.
@ericvantassell68096 ай бұрын
KZbin historians are funny
@dukeon5 ай бұрын
Fun fact: The largest diaspora of Germans today (people of Germanic descent living outside of Germany itself) is in the United States. It is the most prevalent ethnicity in the US, mostly due to the waves of German immigrants in the 19th century who settled in the Great Lakes area (think beer and pretzels) as well as the plains states. My grandparents grew up speaking German at home in rural Kansas, farming and raising livestock. Much of the middle and north of the country is still predominantly German ethnically (as well as Polish and Scandinavian), while English ancestry clusters mostly in the eastern third of the country, and Irish and Italian communities tended to remain predominantly in cities. There have been many other waves of immigrants too, obviously, such as Chinese, Jews, Russians (and Slavs in general), Mexicans, Puerto Ricans, Cubans, Filipinos, Southeast Asians, and on and on. It’s what made the USA such a vibrant nation culturally and economically.
@ninototo15 ай бұрын
Yeah. I found out last year that I have an American uncle and he came to visit us here in Germany last week. He doesn't speak German but his grandparents did. They emigrated in the 1800's. Back then people left en masse due to famine and the promise of freedom (they still had feudalism in Germany). I also notice just how many Americans today still have German surnames, it's crazy.
@guleet755 ай бұрын
The most prevalent ethnicity in the USA are actually people from the British isles ! That includes people who call themselves Americans !!
@bastian96934 ай бұрын
@@guleet75The English are also Germanic cousins…combining the other German speaking countries of Austria and Switzerland which has about 2 million descendants in the states gives Germans the majority even with combined British isles
@dorothybermudez89044 ай бұрын
And all legally here too!
@jiritichy79674 ай бұрын
"vibrant"? Rather heterogeneous, source of disagreements and disunity.
@carlharmeling5125 ай бұрын
A lot of Northerners still migrate south because they’re sick and tired of the cold weather.
@TimDyck4 ай бұрын
Have you ever been outside in -50? It sucks! The only good thing is there are no mosquitoes.
@carlharmeling5124 ай бұрын
@@TimDyck No, but if been out in -30 in Sheboygan and I soon realized that it’s actually life threatening.
@TimDyck4 ай бұрын
@@carlharmeling512 yes at -30 if your not dressed properly your gonna die. I have worked outside most of my adult life and learned quickly that you need to dress properly and know when to add or shed clothing. If you let yourself get too cold your in trouble, if you start to sweat then when you stop working physically your in trouble. It's a balancing act. But to be honest if I could I would rather be outdoors than inside even in the worst conditions. Unfortunately arthritis has set in and the cold is not my friend.
@wutrudoin2 ай бұрын
There's MANY more Italians and Spanish people in Germany than vice versa
@asmirann363623 күн бұрын
@@wutrudoin That is because majority of German migrants went to the Americas.
@HarryMonn6 ай бұрын
120 million is way too much for the population of the Western Empire. Scholars generally think the entire empire never exceeded 75 million. So the Western half probably had around half of that. The first empire to reach 100 million in population was Tang China.
@RoboticDragon5 ай бұрын
Came to say the same
@warmth91405 ай бұрын
They had had waning populations for several generations
@TheAnonymousKnightOfJustice5 ай бұрын
Mr Obvious CHINQ HAS LESS LAND AT THE TIME COMPARED TO GREAT ROMAN EMPIRE 😂
@odenoki95715 ай бұрын
@@TheAnonymousKnightOfJusticeRefer to the 'Valeriepieris Circle' to explain why that is. Most of mankind has lived within one section of planet Earth
@ravinraven69132 ай бұрын
where are you guys getting such random info that conflicts with the rest? There are many estimates of the population for the Roman Empire, that range from 45 million to 120 million with 59-76 million as the most accepted range. they didn't write down the names and counts of all their slaves. So really, it is impossible to say it wouldn't be more.
@ytchanviewer53895 ай бұрын
Low quality popularisation of history : a bunch of maps displayed in arbitrary order without dates, frequent use of dubious terms like "ferocious" and "savages", use of teleology, etc. If there's a bingo card of how *not* to popularise European history from the 300s-500s, this proboably ticks all the boxes. If anyone wants good history videos on this topic, The Historian's Craft is a much better KZbin channel.
@dukeon5 ай бұрын
Thank you, I was thinking the same thing throughout.
@Nowhere-from3 ай бұрын
Hopefully you apply this same logic to the current migrants in western nations, and I truly mean it, no sarcasm.
@d_all_in3 ай бұрын
If that channel is doing a better job popularizing history then why does it get 1/10th the amount of views?
@Okiejayjay3 ай бұрын
@@d_all_in dumbed down population?
@jaif73272 ай бұрын
youre better off not using youtube in general if you want to actually learn history
@Maphisto866 ай бұрын
Ironically the Ostrogothic Kingdom in Italy under the reign of Theodoric the Great was better governed and prosperous than under the last Roman emperors. Despite the weaknesses of King Theodoric’s successors, the Ostrogoth administration maintained Roman civilization in Italy and it could be argued that ancient Roman civilization in its old homeland was destroyed with the devastation wrought by the eastern Roman Empire’s invasion during the Gothic War.
@jaimendaniel55786 ай бұрын
Better governed and more human and Christian.
@YarPirates-vy7iv5 ай бұрын
@@jaimendaniel5578ew
@DeutschlandDenDeutschen18485 ай бұрын
The greeks will not like this comment
@daddy_14535 ай бұрын
Then the former Western Roman Empire got its revenge during the 4th Crusade, which permanently crippled the Eastern Empire, thus enabling the Ottoman conquest in 1453
@IncarnationOfNeutrality5 ай бұрын
You've probably just angered a bunch of Greek Supremacists and Byzantine suck-offs with this one lol
@ImBalance6 ай бұрын
The Western Roman Empire had 120 MILLION people?? Does that not seem super high to others?
@ShengLiang5 ай бұрын
yeah and half of them were slaves.. think about that. no one had to do any work,, well except for the slaves obviously.
@lamastu21565 ай бұрын
40 millions people at it's best.
@boxsterman775 ай бұрын
It sure does.
@lindenstromberg68595 ай бұрын
@@lamastu2156 What are you basing 40 million at its height on? While I don't know where this video got 120 million, Waltger Scheidel puts the Empire at over 100 million, while more conservative estimates (such as Kyle Harpers) put it around 75 million.
@lamastu21565 ай бұрын
@@lindenstromberg6859 The time of Pax Romana the cities had almost 40 million citizens. That I've learned in history scool. Now how many oiving on steppes is anither story. Nobody can say for sure. Roman empire was primary at some cities in Iberian peninsula, the modern Italy without the north Italy, Sicily, the Greek peninsula, the Greek cities in Anatolia and Egypt who formed after Alexander and Roman Carthage. The other parts as northern Iberia, Gallia, Dunabe land, Levant and main Egypt was Secondary Rome. Romans consider the prime citizens the Latin and Greek speakers and secondary the other cultures. Now at 3rd century before the fault of western empire maybe the empire had 120 million citizens. No one can say for sure
@Sargon21376 ай бұрын
Population of Roman Empire 120 million? In 4th century I don't think it was half of that. And in time of sack of Rome by Alaric Ravenna was a capital.
@deaeth14116 ай бұрын
It's really hard for know precisely. It's estimated so.
@padinspi116 ай бұрын
You're right. The roman empire at its peak is estimated to have reached between 60 and 100 million people. That's the entirety of the empire. And some of the most populated regions were in the east (Egypt, Greece)
@fancyfact13896 ай бұрын
@@padinspi11 the area of modern day spain, portugal, france, italy had a population around 30 million at the time, compared to the modern day area of egypt, levant, anatolia had almost 20 million people
@hazzmati6 ай бұрын
Yeah he pulled that number out of his ass. Not even in Rome's golden age did the population reach anything near that
@lagjescuni54826 ай бұрын
@@padinspi11 There was no Greece in that period...however, the most numerous peoples were the Thracians and the Illyrians
@Peizxcv6 ай бұрын
The Huns were running from the Chinese Han Dynasty that chased them all the way to Lake Balkhash
@VforVanish6 ай бұрын
I was curious and asked chatgpt, he answered that Han Dynasty exerted military pressure on the Xiongnu and the Xiongnu onto the Huns. Interesting.
@nenenindonu6 ай бұрын
They weren't running away from anything Xiongnu-Han wars had ended long before the migration period and Huns already had their own polity near the Altai that is the kingdom of Yueban
@عليياسر-ف4ن9ك6 ай бұрын
@@nenenindonuThe Uighurs are allies of the Han Dynasty: they are free real estate 😂😂😂😂
@ravenalbj5 ай бұрын
The Huns didn't run from anybody or anything. They were migratory Skyts who went from the Black Sea to China and controlled everything. They were White Race and their original name was OUZI. Today in Mandarin OUZOU means "European"......get it??? The Mongols were related to the Huns, and Mongols were White Race as well. Genghis Khan had red beard and blue eyes.
@mimorisenpai85405 ай бұрын
They didn't
@abdiyusuf85615 ай бұрын
And today these once mighty warriors are controlled by a small state in the Middle East 😢
@twilightknight23334 ай бұрын
only because they allow it
@lookoutforchris2 ай бұрын
Oy veh! They know!
@labibabdullah3896 ай бұрын
Germany even being a barbarian, is still efficient and competent.
@martinkupka35756 ай бұрын
Germany today is like Rome short before it´s fall.
@wotanvonedelsburg16106 ай бұрын
@@martinkupka3575 EU
@oneshothunter98776 ай бұрын
Imagine if Germany stopped using telex and telefax machines. 😀
@roboparks6 ай бұрын
@@martinkupka3575 It already Fell / The HRE broke up in the 1600s .
@martinkupka35755 ай бұрын
@@jaimendaniel5578 Thanks
@sandrocottusrex71085 ай бұрын
इतिहास में ऐसा होता ही है। एक महान साम्राज्य का अन्त होते ही क़बाइली समाज का उदय होने लगता है।
@timhare98676 ай бұрын
Your numbers here feel well off. Most Censuses I’ve seen to the Roman Empire’s around 60 million. Not 120 million. It’s very difficult to gain a reliable estimate of Germania’s population at the same time, but 3 million sounds ridiculously low. Like an ancient historian has just counted warriors and their familles, and not the vast network of tenant farmers, slaves and their families beneath them.
@gas1325 ай бұрын
my guy, even medieval england only had 3 million people, and france during that same time had nearly 20 million yet england was so good at fighting, that they managed to face france for 112 years and almost beat them all of germania having 3 million people just before their agriculture collapsed seems not only reasonable, but almost too much
@dukeon5 ай бұрын
@@gas132 what a load of 💩
@gas1325 ай бұрын
@@dukeon cool criticism, very informed
@mimorisenpai85405 ай бұрын
@@gas1323 million is too low for Germania. Don't medieval france mostly 7-10 million
@gas1325 ай бұрын
@@mimorisenpai8540 not 7-10 million, 17 million by the time of the hundred years war
@svilendyakovski71915 ай бұрын
I am only at half the video, love the subject, but get irked by the lack of knowledge and understanding. The Macromanic wars of Marcus Aurelius around the year 200 were not mentioned. Neither was mentioned the migration of the Goths south in the middle of the 3rd century, including invading the Balkan Peninsula, and eventually settling on the northern side of Danube river in what is now Romania and Ukraine. The Visigoths did not come into the Western Empire from Germany! They came through the Danube in what is now Bulgaria, killed a Roman Emperor in the battle of Adrianople in 378, had free reign in the Balkans and took them 32 years before they moved into Italy and sacked Rome. Also the push that started the domino effect were the Huns who attacked the Goths in Ukraine and moved Westward pushing Alans, Vandals, Goths, Franks, Suebi etc across the Danube and Rhine.
@kantoquad5 ай бұрын
agreed. not listening to this channel again. I think some people make videos for money, regardless of if they have the knowledge to do so
@alexandrutomescu41465 ай бұрын
Video full of mistakes.
@155gerard3 ай бұрын
Very amateur video full of inaccurate statements, a bit like a 4th grade oral class report
@BraveGisgo2 ай бұрын
Rome was sacked in 410AD, not 420AD
@PeepsChicksАй бұрын
Exatly, also skiping the causes that led to the sack of Rome
@Alsayid5 ай бұрын
It's interesting to think how the Romans Latinized half of Europe, but when the Germans conquered the Roman Empire they simply melded into the Latinized lands (aside from Britain). On the other hand, when the Slavs conquered the other half of Europe nearly every area they took became Slavicized. The Slavs were never known as a powerful people, yet they still became more dominant.
@zjeee5 ай бұрын
It is funny how the slavs that took over ended up being orthodox just like the Eastern Romans. What a coincidence.....
@baassiia5 ай бұрын
Yes and almost ignored in this video 🤣 I was checking once, current population of Slavs vs other groups like Latin, Germanic in Europe and Slavs have highest number. Wondering how that happend. Such a loosers but such huge fertility and adaptability success.
@Terter15515 ай бұрын
The Germanic tribes had a strong warlike culture, they were hierarchical and created many strong kingdoms. While the Slavs (even though they also waged wars) were not that centralized it seems. The strongest and most important early Slavic states were not created by Slavs, but by Bulgars and Rus for example, which melted into the Slavic ethnicity. They probably had a very inclusive culture, as Procopius stated that they lived in a 'democracy'. Also they were probably quite numerous and settled in lands devastated by wars and migrations, which gave them strong positions in those regions. Actually, the Slavs that settled in the Byzantine Empire, were under a heavy threat of hellenization, however they managed to create their own Slavic culture - the Cyrillic alphabet, the Slavic liturgical language, etc. and survive even in those areas.
@marcobassini35765 ай бұрын
@@RichardRemerIt is not only the written word, it is the civilization, the Roman is the greatest civilization ever seen in this side of the world, the Germanic tribes were just barbarians, and left nothing to posterity, not even in their own homeland. Europe is what it is because of the Greek-Roman civilization!! And this civilization is now predominant in most of the world (thanks to the colonial expansion of European countries).
@PoochieCollins5 ай бұрын
@@marcobassini3576 I mean TBF, Germania had far fewer people, and the land was much less supportive of a blossoming society.
@TukozAki4 ай бұрын
5:50 Showing the Ostrogoth going south east from today's Czechia to Illyria is so funny 😄 It's probably to have them come what OP's map shows as Germania, but these people came from the Pontic (today's Ukraine), pushed by even fiercer warriors coming from the East: the Great Migrations from the other half of Eurasia to Europe had begun.
@morahman54965 ай бұрын
Explains why the Germans and the Dutch has a prototype 6” foot 4 inches goalkeeper
@nedames33285 ай бұрын
The folks who went "a viking" were germanic people.
@veronicajensen76904 ай бұрын
correct , however the word Viking was not only used as "going Viking! it was also used for people although many think it wasn't we have Rune stones in Scandinavia where the locals complains about other Vikings (Vikingr/Vikingar in old Norse) and one Rune stone who reads "he was a great Viking" , anyway the Germanic people spread from Scandinavia
@markusbauer90854 ай бұрын
Exactly my thougt. Vikings were part of the northern Germanic culture group. The term "Viking" was used since the looting of the english Lindisfarne monastery in 793 AD. Before it was called "Vendel culture". The term "Germanic" was used until the different tribes were christianizated. That happened in Iceland in the Middle Ages around 1000 AD. The Saxons for example were christianizated by the sword around 800 AD. The first Franconian king who was baptized was Chlodwig in 498 AD. A turning point in european history... Also the number of 120 million inhabitants of the Roman Empire is to much. Should be around 80 million more or less. That is roughly around the third of the complete world population in these times!
@kkinva685 күн бұрын
sami
@Rikhradouhr3 ай бұрын
As Schiller said German poet. We Germans are unique cause we got the Germanic Soul of freedom.
@jeffa8475 ай бұрын
Amazing to still hear the Nordic and Germanic people being called "barbarians". Meanwhile you can't even point out the savagery of individual tribes of other peoples.
@FattasMotorhuv2 ай бұрын
this video is annoyingly full of flaws but the word barbarian ACTUALLY referred to germanic people (and btw norsemen are northgermanic people)
@gerardv.dgalienАй бұрын
@@FattasMotorhuv to be fair it referred to anybody who was not roman(for the romans of course) or Greek(for the Greeks) I believe barbarian comes from the word barbaros which is Greek I think) but I might be wrong in that.
@FattasMotorhuvАй бұрын
@@gerardv.dgalien that’s absolutely true. The Greeks invented the term and used it as you describe. Then the Roman’s adopted the term and used it to label all non-Roman’s and illiterates but over the course of time it was more and more used for Germanic tribes until it became an exclusive term for the Germanic people in Roman day to day language
@antoniomoreira59216 ай бұрын
Not sure it's the right niche but if or anything Migration Era and Germanic related I strongly recommend Schwerpunkt's videos series
@bellum_79975 ай бұрын
Thank you, I was looking for years for this kind of stuff
@jimparsons68035 ай бұрын
Heard about the 'Huns Theory,' in University. The notion of that time was there might have been a "cold spell" in what is now Mongolia or what is now Southern Siberia, for several decades or generations. So people were fleeing the cold?
@lichang-l3m5 ай бұрын
1. It was mainly because of the climate change, weather became colder and colder, therefore, it was harder and harder to agriculture. 2. Almost at the same time, the Chinese empire in the east also suffered the same situation, including the Huns. 3. The Huns was also forced to move to the south, when they encountered Chinese, some started to move west. It was not because the Huns was stronger to beat the German, it was simply because they had large amount of cavalry, and the German were almost infantry.
@jacksprat70875 ай бұрын
I agree on the temperature thing as a root cause of migrations there at about 500AD. A great amount of data pretty well proves a large temp drop.
@filipmelnikov84115 ай бұрын
The description is extremely vague. Nothing is said about the eastern migration of the Goths, nothing about the kingdom of Oium on the territory of modern Ukraine. The path of migration is shown incorrectly.
@ravenalbj5 ай бұрын
What migration???.......the one described by Jordanes??? Those were a bunch of Goths on three ships and that was no migration. The rest of Goths lived right there on Romanian territories and the most powerful of them named GREUTHUNGI have a most Romanian name. GREU means "heavy". GREU-THUNGI means "the heavy ones". The territory was called OIUM, because whoever passed thru had to pay taxes called OIUM. OIUM is derived from the word OI meaning "sheep" in Romanian. The word OIUM meaning "food for Oi (sheep). Even today in Romania one has to pay OIUM 5% to a miller for milling wheat in to flower. Huns and Goths were Romanian ancestors. Germans didn't migrate anywhere. Those were Goths/Gete not Germans. Stop this stupid Mommsen theory. Can't you fools see there is not a German word in those countries you claim Germans conquered??? Conquerors always impose their language. Look at the present situation you idiots. Where Spanish conquered, people speak Spanish. Where Portuguese conquered, people speak Portuguese. Where French conquered, people speak French. Where English people conquered, people speak English. Do you see how dumb you are??? The Goths were Romanian ancestors GAETI/GETE and that is why Italian, Spanish and Portuguese are closer to Romanian than to Latin. Do you fools get it???
@mattmeyer32113 ай бұрын
very good information, thank you!
@jacksprat70875 ай бұрын
Don’t forget there was a large drop in northern hemisphere temperatures about 500 AD. Lot of people were forced to migrate from northern areas.
@anikmahmud17376 ай бұрын
The Roman Empire did NOT end during the Barbarian Invasion, but it ended with the Ottomans conquering Constantinople in 1453!
@daylight33256 ай бұрын
Neeerd
@augustuscaesar82875 ай бұрын
@@daylight3325Nerdy is good.
@erasin88445 ай бұрын
Even though its citizens would have called themselves Roman, Byzantium is not really considered as Rome due to major greek influence and differences in culture but also because of the different capital.
@ikmkz5 ай бұрын
Still to this day not conquered but divided
@vikinglegacy91365 ай бұрын
A city cant be an empire. In the beginning the roman empire was called the roman repuplic. But dont surprise me you wanna take credit for that.
@jefflebowski9186 ай бұрын
Because Germans love Italian food and Italian women.
@nikoskarkavelias16125 ай бұрын
@@jefflebowski918 if only these poor men knew!
@kakehull25663 ай бұрын
As a germanic person i especially love the last thing u mentioned
@loots98216 ай бұрын
The burgundians knew what they were at "lets head to southern France & northern Italy, i heard its nice there!"
@dutchman76235 ай бұрын
They needed to plant their wine somewhere warm...
@voiceofreason26745 ай бұрын
The hunnic empire is prolly the most overlooked historical entity of all time
@jilhaneyisaiahdanielb.88785 ай бұрын
ATTILA: Stop me? He InVITED ME. 😈
@greywolf75773 ай бұрын
Attila the Hun is one of the most well known barbarian of all times. I don't think the Huns were overlooked at all.
@NemoElohemi3 ай бұрын
Not overlooked, just tried hard to forget.
@voiceofreason26743 ай бұрын
@@NemoElohemi very good way of putting it , I haven't ever thought of that , the worst parts of history get swept under the rug
@pdwd8815 күн бұрын
Mongols move into the central Asian steppe displacing the Huns (an amalgam of different peoples related to the mongols), the Huns displace the Avars, who then displace the Slavs, who then displace the Germans. Lots of little groups in between.
@Ghostrex1016 ай бұрын
Absolutely fascinating! Thanks for making this video
@aforrosaline41413 ай бұрын
I was completely absorbed by this ancient history documentary. The way it was put together is incredible.
@morwickchesterham38755 ай бұрын
The biggest mistake Rome made was hiring Germanic mercenaries... These mercenaries made the backbone of the Germanic armies that invaded Rome... They also knew everything about Rome and its military. The same mistake was made centuries later by the Persians, who had continuously hired Arab mercenaries. For those who don't know, the Arabs took-over Persia and Islamised them.
@viktorsocial5 ай бұрын
And now? 🤡🎉
@joebombero14 ай бұрын
They had to use them as Rome kept having brutal civil wars that continuously trimmed off tens of thousands of their best troops every generation.
@ravinraven69132 ай бұрын
uh no, the biggest mistake they made was relying on them as they would rely on their own Legions. And then not training the legions but hiring mercs...Every one used Mercenaries back then, not every one paid...if the germans were properly assisted against the huns and previous waves of invaders. Germans wouldn't have had a need to move into Rome.
@Hun_Uinaq2 ай бұрын
Vikings are Germanic people as well. So, of course the customs are similar! 🙄 I mean duh!
@germanshepherd27015 ай бұрын
Great video but it made me chuckle that… “The westernmost migration of the Germanic tribes ended up in Britain” Meanwhile the Suebi at the bottom of the screen chillin’ all the way in Galicia on the other side of Hispania: 👀👀👀
@nikoskarkavelias16125 ай бұрын
@@germanshepherd2701 well some other 'tribes' tried to do the same en masse not quite a long time ago, using aerial means, if you know what i mean.
@mimorisenpai85405 ай бұрын
Don't forgot vandals and Visigoth
@heinzfischer27105 ай бұрын
Research found that the Roman era had comparatively warm climate, which made also the Germanic lands in the north inhabitable. Still Tacitus wrote about the "cold and raindripping forests of Germania". Probably it was the worsening climate in the dark ages of th 4th and 5th century due to volcanic eruptions somewhere on the globe. which made Germanic tribes migrate, and the reputation of the rich Roman lands. When the Romans arrived in Germany the city of Rome was a big city of a 100 000 inhabitants. while in Germany only villages existed, not a single town! Only villages. Originally the Germanic tribes were backward and living in a kind of cold rainy jungle which covererd their land with a few fields and villages in between. In military terms and handicraft they caught up, in science the backlog of lasted till into the 12 century and longer, while the Arabs who conquered Palestine and North Africa allowed Greek science to continue to thrive except for philosophy, where they interdicted all philosophy outside of Islam. So when Spain was reconquered, they began to translate Arab copies of Greek scientific books back into European languages. The western Europe conquered by Germanic tribes had fallen back below the level the Romans had already achieved. You see this in mathematics where the Arabs developed Al Gebra, and only from the 16th century on the names become French, German, and English: Bernoulli, Law of Cauchy, Lagrange, Laplace, L'Hopital (French), Gauss, Leibniz, Euler (German), Law of Stokes (British).
@uryen9215 ай бұрын
You spoke the Germanic people and the Vikings separately, but weren't they the same group of people?
@MrPbhuh5 ай бұрын
Sort of, Vikings were gently Norse Germanic. Tribes that remained in the North while the Germanic invaders were 400 years earlier.
@ravinraven69132 ай бұрын
they were indeed...this guy doesn't do any fact checking...that or he just reads one book thats been out of date and disprove years ago...
@kkinva685 күн бұрын
no, sami are not germanic
@ellin675 ай бұрын
13:09 later and I'm still wondering why the Germanic tribes migrated. The video very nicely explains HOW they migrated, not WHY.
@jacquesstrapp32194 ай бұрын
It does say at the very end. The Huns, overpopulation, and poor harvests.
@NotoriousN_I_G_3 ай бұрын
Because azns were superior fighters
@GeraldM_inNC5 ай бұрын
I have always read that the cause was the Asiatic hordes. As you said, even though the Germans were great at warfare, the Asiatic hordes were beyond the ability of even the Germans to fight.
@ravinraven69132 ай бұрын
it was the Huns and the Asiatic hordes of the steppe. You shouldn't listen to this guy as a source of facts. He gets one things wrong every minute at least.
@cetus44495 ай бұрын
Maps incorrect as usual....
@jonnygzz16313 ай бұрын
yeah i got annoyed at the location of Massalia, Milan, and Bologna (there's probably more inaccuracies)
@danielk38918 күн бұрын
120 million sounds very high. Wikipedia says 18m in the whole of Roman Europe
@rambopack91404 ай бұрын
Im pretty sure rome at its absolute peak was 75 million people comparable to the Chinese dynasty at that time.
@MegaJellyNelly11 күн бұрын
The Roman Empire did not include land in Poland or Germany. You can see it on your own map. That area was occupied by Germanic tribes
@Tyrs_Finox4 ай бұрын
This video kind of glosses over the gothic kingdom in modern Ukraine and similar regions. Also the other east-germanic tribes like the vandals that were nearby. Collectively they were the ones who took the brunt of the initial hunnic invasion into europe which is the reason why the migrations started. I've always wanted to know more about that old gothic kingdom, it's not very well sourced though.
@Argacyan6 ай бұрын
One anecdote about the vagueness of the term Germania: One of the south-easternmost pre-migration tribal confederation were the Bastarnae & while this map cuts off Germania in Silesia, the Bastarnae lived all the way in current-day Moldova. Post-migration you would still have Germanic tribes in areas like Crimea (the Crimean Goths) for centuries. The use of a green map shade with a strict border is to be regarded as suboptimal as it implies strict cutting-off of an area, though I get it why in mapping people tend to do it.
@AndreasConfirmed5 ай бұрын
Russia and Ukraine did not exist in that time! Also there are a lot of other mistakes in this video.
@markkristopher25522 ай бұрын
Wow! That was really good!
@sahajdeep_sandhu6 ай бұрын
i am early this time 🙂 also i love ur videos they are really informative
@tjmozdzen2 ай бұрын
I wonder how these people with different languages communicated with each other. Even 1850s Germany had hundreds of local dialects, many of which were distinct enough to be incomprehensible to neighboring villages.
@igonz226 ай бұрын
What software did you use to make this video?
@loquat44405 ай бұрын
Mixed with the Germans were some Iranian speaking tribes called Alans that for a few years even had a kingdom in hispania. The most obvious trace of them remaining are the Alano (Alaunt, Alao) dogs that the brought to Spain-Portugral and southern France.
@patrickuotinen4 ай бұрын
2:13 The Danes must love this map.
@nenenindonu6 ай бұрын
Pressure of Oghuric tribes who were led by Hun Kama Tarkhan that's why
@GoaGlenn6 ай бұрын
Why mentioning some origins in southern Scandinavia but only coloring Denmark in green? It is known that some Germanic tribes probably originated from southern Sweden and possible south east Norway e.g The Heruli.
@jamieflame016 ай бұрын
Because the heart land of the culture is Jutland, the Danish islands and Skåne. If you take a look at Beowulf and the locations of Nordic bronze age cult finds.
@GoaGlenn5 ай бұрын
Sure, it could be a sort of heart land. Beowulf likely originating from the Geats(Götar) in what is nowadays Sweden. Yes, I know he traveled to the Danish King
@shailingkhongmalai95155 ай бұрын
@@GoaGlenn denmark is Southern Scandinavia. Germanic tribes originated in Denmark and Northern germany
@ravinraven69132 ай бұрын
huh? Its more likely they originated from Denmark and moved out...denmark, being north of germany...But not across any bodies of water. Makes it much more likely. Then the migration from eastern europe into scandanavia so really..Scandanavians arn't even fully germanic. They are closer to the original celtic peoples...
@Runo19235 ай бұрын
It's safe to say Turks are responsible for the fall of both Western and Eastern Rome in a thousand years apart. Mehmet II finished what Atilla started.
@manjushagongale5 ай бұрын
How Western Roman Empire?
@Runo19235 ай бұрын
@@manjushagongale Huns are one of the oldest known ancestors of Turkic people. They split into Western Huns and Eastern Huns in Europe and Asia. Atilla led the western branch.
@kristianpoulherkild34015 ай бұрын
They weren't German tribes, they were germanic tribes - with their urheimat in Denmark. From where they migrated North, east, west and south.
@erikeriksson166024 күн бұрын
They originated not only from Denmark, also from southerns ans central Sweden and the coasts in southerns Norway.
@Mad-Jam5 ай бұрын
Gothic people most have some connection with Sweden. We have both "Göter/Gauter" (Southern Sweden) and "Gotlänning/Guter" (people from the island in the baltic) groups in Sweden. Jordanes the 6th century historian said that the goths come from a island in the north called Scandza....
@Rainbow_Oracle5 ай бұрын
Yeah, Got, Goth, Gota, Jute, Geat, all same root word for groups with the same ancestry. With Visigoths and Ostrogoths stemming from there, and then settle all of Europe, it's a wonder we came to name them Germanic Peoples. Gothic peoples would have been a much better fit.
@ninototo15 ай бұрын
@@Rainbow_OracleTrue but we call them that cause we copied what the (ignorant) Romans called them.
@trythis20066 ай бұрын
PROUD TO BE A BARBARIAN
@samiman56066 ай бұрын
Me too
@PatriotOfPersia6 ай бұрын
Oh Sh*t
@renevalleramos9946 ай бұрын
Yeah, that is why i wanna be like conan.
@jaimendaniel55786 ай бұрын
A Spanish philosopher, Ortega y Gasset said that the fascination with culture and all things culture is a barbarian trait.
@newreast39045 ай бұрын
When there is nothing else left to be proud of, I guess….
@antoniotorcoli57406 ай бұрын
Because of the Huns mainly.
@gerardvandermeulen624 ай бұрын
120 million, with 50 % (!!!) slaves, that's 60 million slaves in the Empire. Seems a lot to me...
@kriskris9985 ай бұрын
In year 375 the huns crossed don river and attacked the Ostrogoths and this is how the domino effect started
@andrewmichaels57255 ай бұрын
I hope the Germans are not offended that we called them Barbarians. They should be proud of their origins:)
@firstnamesecondname8525 ай бұрын
You should rather ask why the Romans migrated to Germany, France, Britain, Spain, Yugoslavia, Greece, Turkey, Syria, Israel, Egypt, Libya, Algeria, Tunesia and Morocco?
@muhamedmahmutovic66392 күн бұрын
Yugoslavia didnt exist back then, it was called ilyria
@rnz11556 ай бұрын
@Knowledgia you said Skanderbeg part 2 will be ready by April?
@snakeinthegrass7630Ай бұрын
Wrong! The Roman's never made it east of the "Rhein" .
@StevenJebaLeb5 ай бұрын
Now arab/african migration to the same lands.. ahh the cycle of life
@BillDavies-ej6ye5 ай бұрын
I love the beautiful map at 0:41. Sadly, the designer was incapable of spelling Britain correctly, although Britannia, appearing just below it, was correct.
@epg966 ай бұрын
"Why do we call the whole world's attention to the fact that we have no past? It isn't enough that the Romans were erecting great buildings when our forefathers were still living in mud huts; now Himmler is starting to dig up these villages of mud huts ... All we prove by that is that we were still throwing stone hatchets and crouching around open fires when Greece and Rome had already reached the highest stage of culture. We really should do our best to keep quiet about this past. Instead Himmler is making a great fuss about it all. The present-day Romans must be having a laugh at these revelations" (Speer, 141). Speer, Albert. Inside the Third Reich. New York: Avon Books, 1970.
@AnglandAlamehnaSwedish6 ай бұрын
Ah yes gotta have propaganda not that it is used ever after the Nazis were defeated eh
@lagjescuni54826 ай бұрын
the Adriatic Sea was dominated by the Albanians ( illyrians) before Rome became an empire through the lembi and liburna ships..without forgetting that the Macedonians were also vassals of the Illyrians until Philip (Alexander Father) managed to gain independence in the period of King Bardhyl
@TheLionFarm6 ай бұрын
Important The Huns likely entered Western Asia shortly before 370, from Central Asia: they first conquered the Goths and the Alans, pushing a number of tribes to seek refuge within the Roman Empire. In the following years, the Huns conquered most of the Germanic and Scythian tribes outside of the borders of the Roman Empire. They was being pushed kinda like what happened in the bronze age collapse so did iron.
@AnglandAlamehnaSwedish6 ай бұрын
They couldn't go anywhere where there was castles n mountains
@Benito-lr8mz6 ай бұрын
In Spain the Visigoths with a lot of diference the most quantitative invasion.
@RichardDavies-g3h5 ай бұрын
Your maps doesn't include the angles and the saxons
@ThinkTwice22226 ай бұрын
How did these genetic tribes become posh like European royals
@Rildar5 ай бұрын
White excellence
@randomcamus94455 ай бұрын
With time everything is possible
@Do-not-be-sheep5 ай бұрын
The Huns came from the western Eurasian steppes around the Aral Sea not Mongolia
@steffenb.jrgensen20145 ай бұрын
The Huns never reached Scandinavia and thus not caused the Jutes and Angles to go to England. But the Danes, originally inhibiting the Danish Isles and Scania at the same time emerged in Jutland. If they just filled up a vacuum or repressed Jutes and Angles is difficult to say, probably a combination, but I think first of all people crossed the North Sea because they could. Shipbuilding and seafaring techologies accellerated in these centuries and would a few centuries later culminate in the Viking age.
@kb.e37625 ай бұрын
genuine question, why is there atila mentioned in the norse sagas?
@joebombero14 ай бұрын
The Vikings did build amazing ships. Did you see the Viking ship they rebuilt which raced a modern yacht? The Viking ship lost, but it kept pace well. Amazing ships.
@alisarikaya63274 ай бұрын
The book brings a fresh perspective into a stagnated view of the Turkic nations and their past. Primarily based on the genetic findings, backed by the archeological, historical, linguistic facts and testimonies of the ancient scholars, historians, and geographers, this work reveals breaking new evidence about the biblical origins of the Turkic nations who were related to the ancient Akkadians, Sumerians. It unshrouds the Turkic pedigree of the Germanic nations, the natives of ancient Media, and the Scythians. The deciphered cuneiforms of the Behistun inscription in Persia, along with their detailed lexico-grammatical analysis shed light on the revolutionary facts about the Turkic origin of the Medes and their language. A large portion of this volume is devoted to the Scythians and most of their derivative tribes, including those located in Scythia and beyond, such as the As, Sacai, Parthians, Bactrians, Huns, Sarmats, Getai, Celtic, Iberian, Gallic, Germanic, and Thracian tribes - the Trojans with a detailed classification of the related tribes, including the most renowned Illyrians, Spartans, Phrygians, Etruscans, Pelasgi. The in-depth lexico-grammatical analyses of the languages of two major Thracian nations - the Etruscans and the Phrygians ascertain their Turkic origin. The book also demystifies the history of the ancient Armenians who were a Phrygian colony, sets them apart from the modern Armenians, and gives a chronological, historical account of the modern Armenian people, also known as the Hays, under the authority of their first historian Movses Khorenatsi. The comparative analyses of 20 ancient alphabets reveal their (Armenians) common Turkic root. Crucial archeological, cultural, political, linguistic, and genetic evidence points to the Turkic beginning of many Native Americans. Among the numerous quotes from the ancient statesmen and reputable scholars, Dr. A. Sanducci brings forward the statement made by the father of Swedish Historiography prof. Sven Lagerbring: "Our ancestors are Turks who are comrades of Odin. We have got enough evidence on this subject... Odin and his comrades were Turks... We, the Germanic people, are in origin, are Turks. We must not be ashamed of this fact. The Turks are a very honorable and proud people." ............................... Sanducci, A. Having an extensive academic background in Turkic Studies, a former visiting professor to UC Berkeley, USA, Dr. A. Sanducci - the author of the research "Ancient Scholars about the Turks and the Turkic Nations", as well as of many other educational books and articles, gave speeches and lectures in many prestigious Universities worldwide, including Stanford University and UC Davis. Sanducci, A.
@rajsekharRonaldo52976 ай бұрын
Germany : WTF is an empire 😂😂😂
@marchauchler16223 ай бұрын
Not Germany but Germania. Slight difference.
@wildheaven18275 ай бұрын
"They prefer sudden raids as the most effective form of attack, and wield a wide range of well crafted weapons" Some things never change
@inialny5 ай бұрын
Germanic tribes is just the name and does not mean German tribes. There were no German people on the territory of Poland until Polish prince invited the Order of Teutonic Knights in the 12th century. Ostrogoths, Visigoths and Vandals were maybe Germanic tribes but they are not ancestors of Germans.
@internettoughguy59435 ай бұрын
Why do modern Germanic people look exactly how the Roman’s described them then?
@marchauchler16223 ай бұрын
Correct!
@Jether.3 ай бұрын
Germwnic aren't the only Germans, celts,baltics and one slavic tribe too
@TheLegacyTales3 ай бұрын
I love this video man. As someone of German ancestry this is great. Love the bit on the Huns potentially being the most savage which is why Germans fled more West
@KingMordred6 ай бұрын
Remember kids. All of this was Quintilius Varus' fault...
@RichardLucasАй бұрын
The predominant male lineage in Europe and America today is R1b. That was Rome's dominant y-haplogroup, too. The largest concentration of y-haplogroup I1 is still in Scandinavia.
@Misterx-xx1lj29 күн бұрын
“ R1b” means nothing…. There are many “R1B”s … the most prevalent haplogroup in Armenia is R1B and Armenians are different from celtic people
@Misterx-xx1lj29 күн бұрын
“ R1b” means nothing…. There are many “R1B”s … the most prevalent haplogroup in Armenia is R1B and Armenians are different from celtic people
@mohammedabdullah46026 ай бұрын
Because of the Turkic tribes with their horses (Huns ans Avars) ...Attila the Huns used to have an army of 500,000 horse arches spreading terror and blood in Europe
@Manuka-px2pe6 ай бұрын
Moh moh moh, the the reason why norse tribes spread to southern europe was because the iron gate came down in Sweden. The norse are seed of Gog and Magog.The huns came so much later..
@wotanvonedelsburg16106 ай бұрын
@@Manuka-px2pe what?
@ivanos_956 ай бұрын
Nonsense, there was never a point when the Germanic tribes started migrating, but they were constantly pushed to the West, and later into the Roman territories, from Eastern-Europe by the Slavic tribes, who were pushed into Europe by the Uralic and Turkic tribes.
@Alsayid5 ай бұрын
I have never heard before that the Slavs pushed anyone. It was always my understanding that it was the Huns who pushed the Germanic tribes, and when those tribes began moving west during the chaos of the Huns and the Roman Empire crumbling the Slavs filled the vacuum and settled the emptied lands. But that doesn't explain everything, because the Slavs also conquered some lands in the Balkans and further east. And I also don't know why we never heard about the Slavs during the time of the Huns. Many questions.
@azazeln6 ай бұрын
Is CE the same as AD? The same counting of years? Are we in the 2024 CE?
@Trickaz946 ай бұрын
Yes bc/ad are christian terminology And BCE/CE is academic terminology for the educated people
@azazeln6 ай бұрын
@@Trickaz94 Thank you for the answer. What is the reason for CE to begin, I mean what happened and BCE ended and CE started 2024 years ago?
@Trickaz946 ай бұрын
@@azazeln CE stands for common era, in other words when we started counting the years in the new calendar the romans introduced, BCE stands for before common era, before the new year count The christians use their own system which is basically the same but have given their own meaning to it, this was decided on with the Council of Nicea in 325 CE when the roman Catholic church tried to unify all christian cults and reform solely under the roman Catholic church
@rohantayron68576 ай бұрын
@@Trickaz94 Are you serious? The romans just happened to introduce a new calendar in the exact birth year of Jesus Christ? Stop spreading misinformation. The calendar we use today is the gregorian calendar based on Jesus Christs birth, and the atheists just want to use BCE and CE instead of the actual terminology which is BC and Anno Domini. Youre just straight up lying about the Council of Nicaea thing too, there was no roman catholic and eastern orthdoox church back then, there was one united insitution
@argylemanni2806 ай бұрын
@@Trickaz94 Please, get boosted. It is so necessary. You've been educated, you know the score. Believe in the science. The booster waits for you. You need it.
@ReturnEternal5 ай бұрын
Denmark be marked "Northern Germany" and goes oh oh ....
@Schwizinberg6 ай бұрын
What forced huns to migrate west? The sheer will of conquest or they were forced out from their home territory?
@KyoushaPumpItUp6 ай бұрын
Blame the ancient Chinese for the Huns travelling west.
@theotheagendashill8186 ай бұрын
Steppe tribes usually migrate when they're being displaced from their land by another tribal confederation or when their steppe neighbours are weak and easy to conquer. The Alans on the Ponto-Caspian steppe were weaker than the Huns and were ripe for conquest
@ACIron-en6ij6 ай бұрын
They were forced to move go the west by the Ancient Chinese during Han Dynasty that defeated the Huns back in late BC times and made them moved the West centuries later
@chingis11543 ай бұрын
Doesn't make sense I thought huns r not xiognu lmao. And why would huns move west if Chinese stayed in China for next century and huns were in central Asia. They kept on moving to west all the way to France despite conquering everyone around them
@jcole348923 күн бұрын
Play "Atilla Total War" if you want to experience this in a great game! Heavy focus on migration and "surviving" as WRE... One of the more underrated titles and fairly new still, check it out!
@ericp00125 ай бұрын
It seems we are seeing a similar scenario today with others tribes/ tribal groups invading the European Union.
@Rildar5 ай бұрын
No we aren't. Don't compare the two. What's happening today is orchestrated, planned, and extraordinarily genocidal above all else. And unlike the fate the Romans suffered, the invasion today can and WILL be reversed to deadly effect.
@someinteresting5 ай бұрын
Perchance somebody on your team knows that the Iberian peninsula is even further west than the British isles? Or has to know, at least...
@TitusVI3 ай бұрын
As a German i think its highly offensive to call my ancestors barbarians. When Europeans moved into the Americans we didnt call them barbarians either.
@arnarCJer3 ай бұрын
The Amazinhg ("berbers") would like a word with you lol
@davidd.c.93443 ай бұрын
Germans acting like barbarians until WW2, and you take offense??😅😅😅 Yeahhhh, you're so misunderstood. Pity the poor germans. 🤣🌈🤡
@trollmcclure26592 ай бұрын
But the Europeans in America indeed acted like barbarians
@HouthiandtheblowfishАй бұрын
well they called us iranians barbarians too i take it as a compliment whilst sasanids were fighting romans we had even communicated with germans to invade italy whilst we preparing to attack rome there are fascinating accounts of this
@TitusVIАй бұрын
@@Houthiandtheblowfish right. rather be a barbarian who did something in history then beeing african and doing dog shit all history