Why DNA Will BLOW Your Mind | Ken Ham

[@compatiblesystem]

Science is a tool to study what is ALREADY there. I was an atheist until I started studying science and art. Then I realized and saw that God is an artist and everything around is made in perfect design. By a designer. Everything is in perfect order.

[@dipsaccount8838]

Perfectly said, me too turned into a believer, had gone thru an awakening! Everything is designed decorated and coded by a creator and the scope is ginormous! We are just the size of an ant and hence have limited sight and access!

[@ChemysteryKids]

I’m so happy you found God. So many people are so stubborn and just don’t believe in God because they hate God. I’ve had some friends who you can tell they just don’t care. They don’t want proof they don’t wanna even talk about it they don’t wanna know the truth they just want to live their life how they want. It sucks and it’s sad because God loves you and wants you to come to him more than anything. God bless you!

[@rizdekd3912]

But why did his method of transmitting hereditary also transmit a sinful nature? Was he unable to do better or did he want the sin nature to be passed down from the first humans that sinned?

[@ChemysteryKids]

@@rizdekd3912 God gave you free will. That’s like saying “I wish my dad created me to never do bad things”.. the ultimate love is freedom of choice. Would you rather make your kids love you or give them the freedom to choose? You choose to love God by following Gods word and having faith in him in everything you do

[@rizdekd3912]

@@ChemysteryKids This has nothing to do with free will. This has to do with God's method of hereditary passing down a sin nature cue to a corrupted creation. Obviously a 'sin nature' was not needed for someone to choose to sin as is evidence by Adam and Eve along with the angels in heaven rebelling. They managed to do that without an inherited sin nature.

[@larrytate1657]

Science gives me a greater appreciation of God.

[@demolitionwilliams7419]

As it was designed to do!

[@rizdekd3912]

But would you appreciate if God had created and fine tuned the natural world such that it would produce life naturally that could evolve naturally into the diversity of life we see on earth?

[@MansaPeace]

ALLAH IS SO GREAT ❤

[@rkba4923]

Information/Instructions can only come from one source: intelligence. What source of intelligence wrote the genetic code? "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God."

[@josiahpulemau6214]

Amen 🙏🏾

[@madsboyd-madsen3463]

How did you come to that conclusions ?

[@rkba4923]

@@madsboyd-madsen3463 From where do you think information/instructions come?

[@madsboyd-madsen3463]

@@rkba4923 I'm not sure, but I don't think it is a given that it comes from intelligence. You state that it comes from intelligence as if this is an obvious fact. I don't think it's an obvious fact, so I'm wondering where you get the idea from ?

[@rkba4923]

@@madsboyd-madsen3463 It's an obvious fact. Ask any credible scientist.

[@yvetteschneider5172]

Fascinating! Scientists are discovering what and how things are made, how things come about, work together, etc. by hypothesis, testing and finding an outcome to prove the reality of things yet some refuse to believe in the One Utmost Creator most people call God which made everything science wonders about and longs to know about and of all things beyond our ability to understand in existence. We are always looking for the answers of higher intelligence.

[@madsboyd-madsen3463]

Please don't use that argument. For Christs sake.

[@michaelgeorge4600]

PRAISE BE TO OUR AWESOME GOD!!!!!!!

[@alonsoalcantar7847]

I've always wondered if we are born from evolution, and at some point, we were a single piece of bacteria. How on earth did the minerals of earth with no soul, no form of thinking or knowledge, come together and magically formed themselves to become bacteria, and the complex structure of DNA. These same minerals also somehow invented the language of that DNA. As a Christian, it takes less faith to believe in God than evolution.

[@guitart4909]

Chemical processes don’t require a soul to function though. Fire still burns, oxygen still causes rust. Most of the chemical reactions or mutations within DNA don’t yield an advantage, but when it does, we call it evolution. And evolution is very real. But it doesn’t answer why matter behaves the way it does. Or whether there is a being that assigns these properties to matter. But it’s not logical to invalidate a process by equating it to magic, while simultaneously believing in a magical entity or God. God has historically been a placeholder term to explain things we don’t yet understand. And it is much easier to believe God as a cause vs understanding quantum mechanics. But the easier understood premise isn’t necessarily the most accurate one. You can’t use the tools of the natural world (science) to prove or disprove the existence of a being that is outside the bounds and laws of the physical world (God).

[@SatanFollower1]

It’s called abiogenesis stupid

[@Woopor]

Evolution does not try to answer that question, how did life first become a thing. However, with more deep sea discoveries we have more and more clues. Volcanic vents spew chemical soup into the oceans, making a perfect storm for proteins and eventually basic life to be created. Or maybe not. Maybe God made the first cell. Evolution doesn’t NEED an understanding of the origin of life to work, we can see it work, it does work, regardless of the missing pieces

[@h.gonyaulax2190]

Biochemistry is not built from minerals.

[@chuckl4449]

What are sodium, magnesium, potassium, etc...then?

[@LRW-uh5he]

The Hebrew term for the soul is refresher /nephesh, derived from the verb naphash 'to refresh'. This is the DNA. Thus, Jesus told his disciples not to fear those who can destroy the body but not the nephesh, adding that even the hairs of their head were numbered Mt 10:28-20

[@MarcTheVoice]

Praise Father GOD‼️‼️‼️❤️❤️❤️ All Glory to JEHOVAH 🥰

[@davidgooden219]

DNA is one step in the way God creats humans and all things, period!

[@racerpro2123]

To know God, you only have to learn how to love him.But to understand what is God, you must love to study and understand the science with all your might and mind.

[@kickdragon]

And His Word

[@wwvv6504]

God is not a world being. So God has not a gender(he or she)

[@racerpro2123]

@@wwvv6504 God isn't a world being.Prove it brother. Regarding gender, we can conclude later.

[@wwvv6504]

@@racerpro2123God created the world we are living in. God created the time. What proof bro. God has no child and god is not someone's or something's son/daughter

[@racerpro2123]

@@wwvv6504 so how you know this? From where you came to know about your claim? Or is it just your assumption? Pl let me know.

[@r0flcopter]

Thank you for this explanation.

[@RobertSmith-gx3mi]

After science explained to Ken ham, what DNA is Ken And apologists like him then went on to assert well there's your proof of my god. They used to point at trees and mountains and assert that same kind of proof of their god and that's a problem for them. All they can do is point and assert.But they don't have any evidence linking any of the things they point to to a god

[@stephenlesliebrown5959]

"It is only the inferior thinker who hastens to explain the singular and the complex by the primitive short cut of supernaturalism." H.P. Lovecraft

[@TheAwakenOnes]

Do you know that humans have the alphabets in our DNA. The double helix of DNA symbol, the red carries 12 letters and the blue has 10, wx yz is not in our DNA because it belongs to God. That's why we call him Yah Weh (YZ WX). Do you know that the sound of the letters is in all living things (I mean everything, including all beings off earth), and that our hands for every movement you make is actually spelling every letter in the word spoken and it's a Universal hand language around the world, no matter what the spoken language, the translated word is spelled differently but the motion is the same? Do you know that you can hand sign language with one, two, three, four fingers or no finger at all, and still sign just with your arm, sign in print letters or in script? Do you know you can learn God's alphabet sign language just by motioning your hand to the double helix of the DNA symbol and anyone that wants to learn this can learn it in one day, not months as other Hand Sign Languages around the world? This is God's chosen sign language, alphabet codes that reside in our DNA. The other person that might know this information, but not as much as I know, is Gregg Braden, his topic for Toronto Canada conference for September 13-15. I have documented this process, how it works in our internal body and you can learn. I wish I could attend the conference just to see how much Gregg knows, but I can't afford it 😔

[@jellyface401]

Why stop in genes? You can go on forever, but it always starts and ends with God!

[@LRW-uh5he]

Thank you for the nice surprise. Talking about language, did you know that the Hebrew word rendered soul is nephesh, נָפַשׁ which comes from the verb, naphash, which means 'to refresh'. All living things have a refresher. I think that refresher is a great descriptive term for DNA. Thus, Jesus told his disciples not to fear those who can kill the body but not the refresher, and that even the hairs of their heads were numbered ... Matthew 10:28-30. So God retains the information of your DNA / Refresher.

[@jesusisjewish9674]

Very interesting Ken’s story about the evolutionist putting the 26 letters of the alphabet and randomly pulling them out, spelling a 3 letter word to “prove” evolution. It seems to me, the problem with this illustration seeking to prove evolution is this; the cells in all living things are made up of DNA. To put it in terms of letters, each strand of DVA is made up of nearly 3 billion letters that all have to be in exactly the right order. For evolution to be true, the evolutionist needs to pull not 3 letters, but 3 billion letters out of a hat, all in exactly the right order and all by random chance. This could not be done in a trillion years! The complexity of creation shows us there must be a creator.

[@Woopor]

But you’re wrong, see. Chemistry don’t have to pull all those 3 billion strands out of a hat, it only had to pull around 4000 molecules out of a hat, and it had hundreds of attempts, each yielding thousands of results from one pull. Once those 4000 letters finally WERE pulled, there was no more pulling letters from hats, since there was already a successful organism. And that successful organism reproduces, and its fittest offspring survive to reproduce more than its siblings, and their fittest offspring reproduce more than the weaker ones, and their environments naturally select the most fit organisms, which happen to be the ones with specific DNA that’s more complex. You seem to grossly misunderstand how long even just a million years is, which is more than ample time for ancient earth to create a primitive cell. And you also seem to forget that there were BILLIONS of years between that barely alive, simple cell and us

[@digital1083]

@@Woopor Ultimately though, science has still a hit a brick wall with the "Hard Problem of Consciousness".

[@AsherManey]

​@@Woopor Hey, did you know that DNA vital for life is only made of right-handed amino acids and that nature produces both right and left? This means that almost all of the amino acids that you're counting on making life are completely useless. Also, there are roughly 500 different kinds of amino acids and life as we know it uses only 20, so try making the 'perfect arrangement' of life given all of those hinderances. The point is, God made everything. Making evolution sound like a simple game of cards doesn't help make it any more realistic.

[@awseko4732]

@@Woopor There are 0 examples of 2 celled organisms.

[@PhilIsaak]

@@Wooporlife can’t come from non life but who cares about the LAW of biogenesis…….things tend to chaos and disorder but who cares about the 2nd LAW of thermodynamics Consciousness from unconsciousness? How? It just did …… Reason from non reason 🤷🏻‍♂️ Time isn’t the friend to the evolutionist because more time with no guiding force equals more chaos and disorder. That’s science.

[@siggmundfloyd1858]

Entelechein Aristotle had his hands around it.

[@KaapoKallio]

Evolution us such a powerful force.

[@seanpol9863]

Ah yes, the ol' "DNA is a language, so there must be a programmer" argument. Ken Ham's analogy with Morse code is a nice touch, but it's actually pretty off. DNA is not a "language" in the same sense as human languages or programming languages-it's a biochemical system that encodes information necessary for life through chemical interactions. The idea that it requires a "mind" behind it because it carries information is an exaggeration. After all, we don't assume that a pile of books on a shelf requires an author just because they contain information. As for the claim that evolution is "absurd" because it can't explain how information arises, that's simply false. Natural processes, like mutation and natural selection, do explain how new genetic information can accumulate and be passed on over time. There's no mystery there. And the idea that "matter can't produce information" has actually been debunked by biologists a million times. Random processes, like genetic mutations, create variation, and natural selection filters out the ones that don't work, leading to complex adaptations over time. It's not some kind of magic. And for the record, the age of DNA and evolution doesn't require a "creator" when the evidence overwhelmingly supports a natural, gradual process over millions of years. Also, as much as Ham wants to frame it as "absurd," every major scientific field-biology, geology, astronomy, and physics-points to evolution being the most supported explanation for the diversity of life on Earth. So, keep trying, Ken, but the science just doesn't back you up.

[@FranklinThe1]

As a Christian I would appreciate this video more if it addressed the lab studies done where microscopic organisms evolved through natural selection. There most definitely is a degree of evolution allowed by natural selection.

[@davidm4566]

Maybe I can help. DNA is very malleable. We are given flexible genes that change over time. It's "evolution" as in change, but there are limitations of what DNA can do. Also, new info generally doesn't happen. Natural selection tends to be a reduction of existing code that ends up helping the population. Like, if a beetle loses the information for wings, and it somehow helps them survive better on some ecosystem, but it doesn't make the information for new, functional wings that didn't exist before. The biggest example is bacterial resistance to antibiotics. Antibiotics trigger cytolysis (it makes the cell disintegrate) in bacteria. When bacteria are immune to an antibiotic, it's because they had a mutation that didn't have the gene to melt when contacting antibiotics. So they didn't react in the normal way. When all the normal bacteria die off leaving the mutants, they reproduce leaving the population stronger. That's natural selection, but the bacteria didn't evolve into a super version, they just basically mutated to not have an allergy. So is that evolution? Yes, as in the population changed over time, but no, as in it didn't really become something new. The pollination just no longer has an allergy that the species used to.

[@SaturnTheShiningOne]

They adapted, but through human interaction. And how much further can they adapt? The answer is only a small amount of adaptation before reverting back to single cell organisms. This is only achieved in lab studies not in natural conditions.

[@robertecarpenter]

What you are referring to here as evolution is actually hybridization or a rearranging or deletion of EXISTING genes. This can be a response to the environment (natural selection, like Darwin's finches) or the result of an intelligent director (German Shepherds or Shetland ponies). It is possible because of the incredible genetic latitude God built into our genes to begin with. This is micro-evolution. But these all have dead ends - they can only go so far. Dogs can only get so big or so little; beets can only get so sweet. These traits were all built into the organism's original genome. All the hybridizing in the world can never produce new species. This is well documented with the fruit fly. But to produce a new, previously unknown novel species! Now that would be Evolution with a capital E! ... Darwin's dream come true! To get this result requires irrational thinking, like the "Hopeful Monster Theory", or "Punctuated Equillibrium"! Realize that all this DNA is useless without an operating system ... information, which in a non-physical entity. There is no evidence that nature has ever produced a single bit of information, much less the encyclopedic volume necessary to run the simplest form of life. To do this requires an intelligence far beyond what we can even imagine. Or some more incredible irrational borderline psychotic thinking ... that would be your "Panspermia" theory. I humbly submit to you that the only reason to believe such balderdash is to insulate yourself from a Holy God Who requires the acknowledging of our immoral behavior, repentance from it, and placing our faith in Him. Only in Him will you find perfect peace ... and the answer to the origin of life and its divine diversity.

[@caligrafocaracas]

The Inca Quechua writing has this pattern

[@akmmonirulislam3961]

You are correct but all life forms have DNA and it evolved in billions of years. DNAs are not created overnight. If you could go back 3.5 billion years, study how simple life evolved them complex lives evolved probably you understood the evolution. Creation does not take billion years, it just happens. But DNA you see today is a result of 3.5 billion years of evolution. We know very little does not mean we have to believe in miracles. Monirul Islam Dhaka, Bangladesh. 09 May 2024

[@davidm4566]

He's right, though that DNA is only information. If there was no God, then it would beg the question, How does information/instructions on how to build something develop at the same time as a process that can also read, understand, and process the information into real world things like muscle and cells? And where did the DNA information come from? Where did the building materials like atoms come from? And how is DNA made from the building blocks of protein, when DNA codes for protein? In other words, how are the original instructions for the material made from the same material it codes how to make? If we closely examine it objectively and honestly, none of it makes any logical sense to have developed by itself.

[@marcj3682]

"But DNA you see today is a result of 3.5 billion years of evolution. " PMSL.

[@mihaleben6051]

Its acids.

[@Me2Lancer]

Thank you again for making a compelling case for the necessity of having a Creator God. I've been interested in Creation science since the early 1960s.

[@candiliniacity1490]

Today I thought about it.

[@Brucec-x6r]

Unreal dreamers in an unreal dream.all of humanity down the rabbit hole,does not exist

[@davidm4566]

DNA is software. It's computer code. But instead of digital, binary code, it's chemical, quad code. It's computer programming, but exponentially better than binary code with ones and zeroes.

[@Penrodyn]

Except binary isn’t as error prone as DNA. DNA itself is not the key, it’s a passive lifeless molecule. It’s the proteins that are made from it that are important. It’s the proteins that look after the DNA, by replicating and translating the DNA sequence. Living organisms don’t work like our computers, they are more analog than digital.

[@davidm4566]

@@Penrodyn Genetics is fascinating. There is one aspect that is coded, transferrable/messages. Then there is also a method of reading the information, another method for copying the information, and another for converting the information into physical proteins. Plus the instructions to make it all happen, and the information to carry it all out. And without a Creator, it would have all had to develop perfectly at the same time on the first try, or none of it would have worked. Plus the ability to perfectly pass on all of that to the next generation-like you mentioned, there's a lot of errors, so how is it even possible to work? A question: which came first, the instructions for how to make the endoplasmic reticulum, ribosomes, and protein, or the ribosomes that are built from the endoplasmic reticulum, protein and ribosomes? It's sort of like the only recipe for how to make the cake was written on the cake.

[@Penrodyn]

@@davidm4566 that’s true, there are a lot of proteins involved, evolution has had a long time to make this all work.

[@davidm4566]

@@Penrodyn My point is that all of those processes would have to come together exactly right on the same try or none of it would work. Even if 99% of it came together without that last part, it would have to start over from scratch. There's no saving of progress; it would always be back to square one. A trillion years wouldn't be enough time to have all of it come together at the same time as no amount of time could make it work. That doesn't even begin to explain the presence and function of enzymes, which make reactions happen in a fraction of a second rather than thousands of years. For me it's just not logical to think that everything required came together undirected.

[@Penrodyn]

@@davidm4566 I don’t think they have to come together all at once. We’ve often seen staged changes between the initial and final solution in many processes. Just because we can’t think of an explanation doesn’t mean it couldn’t happen. Plus the function of DNA was only discovered in the 60s so we haven’t had that long to investigate the problem, and it isn’t a well funded area. Until we can without doubt eliminate the origin of life by natural process, we can’t dismiss it as an option. The other option is seeding, which is possible. A supernatural cause is not something I would consider myself because I don’t have any personal evidence for the supernatural.

[@stevemiller8895]

YHVH Y=10 = RESPONSIBILITY OR SOVEREIGNTY OR WILL OF MAN H=5 = THE GRACE OF GOD V=6 = THE NUMBER OF MAN H=5 = THE GRACE OF GOD = IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY / SOVEREIGNTY OR WILL OF MAN TO TESTIFY OF THE GRACE OF GOD (THIS IS THE NATURE OF SPERM COMING FROM THE TESTES TO TESTE - FY)

[@wking7909]

"I can't comprehend...therefore magic man in the sky." There is nothing wrong with not knowing everything just admit it and stop saying must be God. Everything that was unknown in the past-gravity, stars , eclipses, moon, sky, rain, earthquakes, desease, etc, etc.- was thought to be from gods!

[@DianaMcFerran]

Not talking about false gods but THE omniscient God the creator

[@madsboyd-madsen3463]

Ahhhh ... now it's much clearer.

[@davidgooden219]

Yess

[@thegreatdestroyer6506]

@@DianaMcFerran Ah, so you happen to be born in a part of the world, into a specific family that just so happens to have the "right" religion and believes in the "right" God. How convenient.

[@ArranVid]

Rosalind Franklin helped them discover the structure of DNA.

[@h.gonyaulax2190]

They have gained unauthorized access to Rosalind Franklin's hard-won data. They had not contributed anything to the X-ray structure analysis.

[@bicepticus4038]

@@h.gonyaulax2190 she actually willingly shared her data with Watson and Crick...

[@h.gonyaulax2190]

@@bicepticus4038 That is definitely wrong! She did not share the information because she wanted to be sure herself first. Only Maurice Wilkens, as head of the laboratory, received a copy of photo 51, which he “unfortunately” showed to Watson and Crick, who obtained their missing information from it. The hard work of analyzing the X-ray structure data was Franklin's achievement. Watson and Crick had contributed nothing, but nothing at all!

[@JontheBerean]

❤️✝️🙏

[@JontheBerean]

Why I believe in the Lord Jesus Christ : kzbin.info/www/bejne/oHq9YWBjab-oqKc

[@Thunderhorsebaba]

ATGC

[@JJ-es3lv]

I want this channel to go over the ancient Sumerian tablets. They predate the Christian Bible and has been translated to a god like being Enki created man in his image to be a slave race to mine gold for their planet. Talks about creating adamu in the garden of Eden. Would love to hear his thoughts on this.

[@RH-go4wi]

Its al lso simple there sure is a God, we mske it complex and I beleive we ..all humans do not have the minds the brains to understand or know god.

[@antoinebguitar2869]

Bro we could discover a entire new mineral deep doen the earth or whatever and people would find bible verses that could describe it. URMOM 4:20: ..."And under the surface between what seperates the good and evil thy shiny shall be found within the ripples of it's mother". If i was God i would make so obvious u cannot doubt it, like sup creations of mine, here is the book of recipe how i create u and all the things around you, you just to arrangr this molecule in this specific order, use that or that law of physics, thats how i coded life. But idk so far he hasn't.

[@yeetyeeterston6916]

Before the word molecule exists? You should look at the Hebrew translation of the first word of the Bible in Genesis by John Costik. It literally spells out "His son will be destroyed by his own hand on the cross"

[@yeetyeeterston6916]

Before the word molecule exists? You should look at the Hebrew translation of the first word of the Bible in Genesis by John Costik. It literally spells out "His son will be destroyed by his own hand on the cross"

[@JojoKanto-gw7ts]

👍👍👍

[@paulmuriithi9195]

strawmanning people into convincing themselves that God exists is just pathetic. this is nonsense

[@imaw8ke]

We did write the Bible on a rope with beads... It's called the rosary...

[@davidm4566]

It does sound similar. I don't know much about the Rosary; isn't it a prayer and each bead represents something? You're right that it is a coded message! That is pretty cool.

[@DianaMcFerran]

No the rosary was created by the Catholic institution

[@mzfee7521]

If they discovered it, who was Rosalind Franklin??? @answersingenesis

[@Cali_Girl1]

❤👍