Why Do Modern Militaries Still Need Artillery

Why modern militaries still need artillery. Anyway, before we move further, we will identify what artillery is. Artillery refers to a class of heavy military ranged weapons built to launch munitions far beyond the range and power of infantry firearms. Early artillery development focused on the ability to breach defensive walls and fortifications during sieges, and led to heavy, fairly immobile siege engines. As technology improved, lighter, more mobile field artillery cannons developed for battlefield use. This development remain today, modern self-propelled artillery vehicles are highly mobile weapons of great versatility generally providing the largest share of an army’s total firepower.
Other videos you might like:
This is How Accurate is $4 Million M777 Howitzer's Shooting ► • This is How Accurate a...
What Makes Caesar self propelled howitzer Truly Special ? ► • What Makes Caesar self...
Why Do Modern Militaries Still Need Artillery ► • Why Do Modern Militari...
How Far Can U.S. Artillery Shoot? ► • How Far Can U.S. Artil...
The British AS90 Self Propelled Howitzer - Artillery Review ► • The British AS90 Self ...
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv
/ militarytv.channel
defense-tv.com/

[@Military-TV]

US$195,000 What can a Black Hornet drone do? kzbin.info/www/bejne/b3rOkoNsjbKBkNk

[@carkawalakhatulistiwa]

God of war is artillery. By stalin

[@sarahoberling4436]

So convient for their war mongering to bring out the technology of missiles and nuclear fusion/fission weaponry. AM I THE ONLY ONE HERE THAT KNOWS THAT NUCLEAR POWER IS NOT REALITY OTHER THAN HEATING WATER INTO STEAM. FEAR KEEPING US THIBKING WE NEED THEM FOR OUR PROTECTION. I ASSURE YOU IT IS ALIE. EVEN THE SIGIL OF LUCIFER SHOWS ONE WHO FEARS GOD ABLE TO DRAW THE COMPARISON OF THE SIGIL TO THE HELIOCENTRIC MODEL....UNLESS U BELIEVE THE SUN IS 63MILLION MILES AWAY

[@thuggeegaming659]

Artillery is the most cost effective way of delivering massive firepower to a target. Even when air supremacy has been achieved, artillery is clearly the cheaper option compared to bombing. Also it can provide fire support when you need it indefinitely, while aircraft can only loiter in an area for a limited time before it has to refuel/rearm. With that said, the Ukraine war has become an artillery war because of highly effective anti-air capability on both sides has precluded any possibility of saturation bombing without the attacker suffering massive casualties.

[@achatcueilleur5746]

Artillery assholes can inflict damage to civilian buildings only when there is no armed civilians to kill artillery personnel. Artillery can kill unarmed civilians only. Artillery can't kill matching counter artillery.

[@reboundrides8132]

Russia failing to establish air supremacy or even superiority is what led to them being slaughtered. They should have gone in similar to the US vs. Iraq in 1991.

[@justarandomguy3969]

@@reboundrides8132 russia went in pretty heavy with the aircrafts, but so many got shot down by simple javelins and similiar that russia stopped. losing an aircraft worth 65-85 million dollars by a javelin costing 250 000 for the launcher and 180 000 per missile doesnt make sense. a lot of their aircrafts are also not operational or under very bad condition like missing gps, on top of this they have more aircrafts than pilots since training pilots are expensive

[@herptek]

If there is one thing the Ukrainian war has proved it is the efficacy of artillery. With the advent of mass use of drones in recent conflicts one could have guessed that it would be relegated into a secondary role in the battlefield but that didn't turn out to be the case this time, quite the opposite.

[@nashemachiri9293]

This was a good thread 👍

[@The88Cheat]

I think people forget that artillery fire isn’t random. They are quite accurate weapons. I mean, we’ve only been at it for a couple hundred years. You tend to get good at things.

[@youregenericjoeboibcyes]

for people who dont to wait 7minutes artillery is a big beast able to demolish shit from a distance

[@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723]

Because guided missiles are expensive and can be outsmarted but you can't do shit to outsmart big bullets!

[@achatcueilleur5746]

Artillery assholes can inflict damage to civilian buildings only when there is no armed civilians to kill artillery personnel. Artillery can kill unarmed civilians only. Artillery can't kill matching counter artillery.

[@ObamanableSnowman]

Well man kinda true but less about out outsmarted. Cruise missles are way harder to stop especially fast and low flying ones. Artillary is behind the most modern missles but way cheaper and faster to produce for bulk effect even under economic constraint and sanctions on parts like electronics.

[@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723]

@@ObamanableSnowman until you get the Montana class with rail gun

[@gezalesko3813]

these bullets are so dumb there is no way to make them change their mind..

[@bobcosmic]

War is a Racket by Maj Gen Smedley Butler !

[@christopherpotter114]

Wow, this is exactly what I was looking for!

[@Vendell_23]

how about discussing the return of the light tanks next

[@billwhoever2830]

this didnt happen yet and is just what some imagine will happen all new mbts for big world powers are super heavy, this includes the t14 which is much heavier than the t90, all the leopard2, leclerc and abrams upgrades most light tanks being introdused are aimed in smaller militaries untill a large military like the US starts buying lightweight tanks (less than half of what an abrams is) all the light tank thing is just speculation

[@Vendell_23]

@@billwhoever2830 the US recently procured their light tank called griffin II mpf meanwhile china and Russia already have it and soon India will procure their own light tank to counter china light tanks in the himalayas. South korea and Indonesia also have it and they are big military

[@extraditori6604]

Артиллерия все ещё актуальна и сохраняет свою важность. Боги войны

[@kurtmcdonald03416]

Because it's the best and cheapest weapon to pound structures to Oblivion as well as people and gurnt infantry

[@drbendover7467]

You can only express your military power with artillery if your got lots of nukes, this is not a guess:)

[@meejinhuang]

It still gets the job done. It's a poor man's air strike.

[@CarlosAlejandro.-ke6gr]

Cheap and you can hammer the hell out of the enemy with it with low effort, cost

[@quanghuynguyenang8455]

Satellite is what make artilleries from "shoot to scare" to "shoot to kill" weapons

[@DollarJonny]

+ продолжайте , очень интересно !

[@hlulanichavalala6737]

Crazy

[@quanghuynguyenang8455]

I still prefer Jet Bomber than Artillery

[@RR-us2kp]

Artillery is king. And always will be king

[@jeffwobrak5205]

Field Artillery - your low-cost option for those pesky neighbors.

[@ernestenujuba6875]

God fights on the side with the best artillery. Napoleon Bonaparte

[@JorjMusk]

To Cannon all men are equal Napoleon

[@brianellinger6622]

what do you consider "modern" because most of dat we aint allowed to know about,....

[@tc47101]

😮😮😮😊👍👍👍

[@TheSilverChains]

Bring the Rain.

[@KondorDCS]

When energy shields become a thing, then arty will face dethroning.

[@JoaoSoares-rs6ec]

Don't bet on it

[@VunderGuy]

Couldn't that be said about infantry and Calvary too?

[@JoaoSoares-rs6ec]

@@VunderGuy they have been saying that for years, they said that wen bronze replaced stone, wen iron replaced bronze wen steel replaced iron, wen gunpowder first appeared as weapons, guess what we still use blades in war, they said that wen gunships first appeared tanks were history, the main spearhead in modern armies is still the tank, it will always be there

[@Blue_Shamu_Gaming]

Laser artillery lmao

[@JoaoSoares-rs6ec]

@@Blue_Shamu_Gaming that would be stupid, no way a laser could ever beat a conventional gun, to start conventional guns can do indirect fire, something impossible for a laser.

[@JorjMusk]

God favours the army with superior artillery Napoleon

[@Lucinda666]

Yo Rocket vehicles are best instead artillery.

[@ROTNReaper]

I made it to 1:28 before I had to pause this, leave a comment t and leave. That breathing in the mic is sending me elsewhere

[@goodbonne452]

Artillery bombardment is given Russia superiority

[@KondorDCS]

Aerial bombardment has given the US superiority.

[@nikitatrusov4028]

@@KondorDCS like in Vietnam, lol, army of military criminals and civilian killers

[@diegomoreno7760]

@@nikitatrusov4028 or ucrania the rusian army of military criminals killing raping or stealing of ucranians citicients

[@I_Stack_Metal]

@@nikitatrusov4028 😆 lol ok.Chechnya and Bucha. Rapists and torture.

​@@nikitatrusov4028 Like in Checknya, Dagestan, Ingushetia and Syria where the orcs killed hundreds of thousands of civilans

[@markflanagan9187]

I dont know why, but it sounds like your attached to a breathing machine

[@JonathanRodriguez-si2ng]

Is it me or did have prenounced breathing

[@nizardzul4002]

finally, a video that looks like support the russia military equipment😂

[@Th3Nigma]

I hate when sentences start with "Why" like a question, but have no question mark. Why don't you punctuate.

[@aurorapaisley7453]

Well, well, well. How the turns have tabled.

[@EricTheActor805]

I hate when people end sentences with a period. Why don't you use question marks after asking a question?

[@cristhianramirez6939]

Why dont you?

[@wisdombriefly1324]

Why can’t countries just have a hockey match? Who ever wins keeps the land

[@simonmartin_ch]

How would that work? Its not like the countries fight over some unclaimed patch of land. Would you be willing to accept a hockey game where you could loose your own country to Russia?

[@jaysonyoungman8772]

Let's say North Korea wanted to annex your neighborhood, would be satisfied with being forced to revoke your former citizenship if they won a hockey game over it

[@howdj]

Because nobody cares about ice hockey?

[@wmg5939]

@@simonmartin_ch well you could also loose that in a war

[@simonmartin_ch]

@@wmg5939 That is true. But why would you accept such a hockey match in the first place? All risk - to maybe keep your land... Let's say a burglar enters your house, you welcome him with a weapon of choice - why don't you resolve this over a game of chess? Because it is an unsolicited attack with one-sided motivations with all your valuables at stake. In a war, the attacker wants something - but they don't offer anything in return if they lose a hypothetical game.

[@David_Phoenix23]

Artillery is stupid and OP and should be banned

[@AutisticPlays]

Cope

[@vorrdegard2176]

Nah it's just a rock thrower 2100AD

[@AussieCunt42]

Remember, God Fights on the side with the best Artillery