Why Do Stars Draw Circles Around Polaris?

[@epiqemusic]

This would work if the Earth were the only thing spinning. How can we see the stars doing a perfect circle around Polaris when the earth is not only spinning on its axis but also spinning around the sun all while spinning around our galaxy whilst simultaneously spinning around the universe at unquantifiable speeds? Where is the parallax?

[@shogun_1991]

Flat 🌎

[@nervousordo]

It's magic. 😆

[@tokyokhot1104]

And you can see north star wherever you are on the planet

[@joaovictormaiochidomingos2427]

@@tokyokhot1104 no you can see the north star from anywhere on the north hemisfere, I live in the south hemisfere and can't see Polaris.

[@Krookedhands]

You won't be alive to even see a change in the stars. It'll take over 10,000 years to see a Slight difference. Also you se polaris all year round cause it's directly up. Look at it like this, polaris is the top or tip of a cone and the earth is at the base spinning around. No mater where earth is at the base it'll always see north star.

[@540Productions1]

Mfs think the earth turns that fast yet a tornado tears our shit up. Lol no the skies move we dont

[@JacobLM42]

The earth rotate 0.000695 RPM

[@miguelsanjuan4618]

Hi sir can you make a demo illustration of this with the earth spinning around the sun. How does polaris stay perfectly aligned with the north pole while earth is spinning around the sun?

[@wpaia]

let me know if get that answer I wanna know too

[@usleratntop]

here's how, if you still want to know: Polaris is about 2,000,000,000,000,000 miles away from earth. Thats about 2 Quadrillion miles. An unimaginable distance. yet the earth, as it travels around the sun, travels 500 million miles, in one year around the sun. That's still quite a long distance, but it's NOTHING in comparison to how far away Polaris is. Imagine you're looking at a mountain that's a few miles away. If you take only a few steps to the right, the mountain isn't really going to change positions, because it is very far away. That's why Polaris doesn't seem to move much at all. Because the distance the earth travels around the sun is baby steps compared to the distance to Polaris. Hope this helps!

[@Aman-gq4mk]

@@usleratntop & then what about the other stars that are in addition to the polar star

[@usleratntop]

@@Aman-gq4mk Here's what's happening with them: so the reason that the polar star always stays in the same spot is because no matter where the earth is, in its orbit around the sun, the earths north pole will always point towards Polaris, therefore it never appears to move in the sky. However, with other stars, they arent aligned with the north pole of earth, so as the earth orbits the sun, we see different stars throughout the year, because we're looking at different parts of space throughout the year.

[@arnoio8355]

yeah the earth's tilt on its axis doesn't change during it's orbit around the sun, that's what confuses most people on the matter when they throw seasonal changes into the equation. The earth doesn't wobble- or at least, not much (it does a little bit which is why ice ages happen I think)- so the north pole will be pointing towards the north star at any point in the year.

[@_TheGman]

Being able to still see ships that are miles and miles away and the so called curvature should make them out of sight was one thing, but once I saw the time lapsed camera of Polaris I knew for sure that we were being lied to.

[@JohnHazenhousen]

What are you talking about, Gavin?

[@Marukanitel]

It's people like you 🤦‍♂️

[@DlCKWALLACE]

@@JohnHazenhousen He's talking about how he thinks the Earth is flat.

[@JohnHazenhousen]

@@DlCKWALLACE Yes, he’s not very bright.

[@TheRotnflesh]

Tidal distortion in relative spacetime. The larger the perspective, the more time required to perceive change. We do not operate on a month-to-second basis so we cannot perceive this motion except over long periods of tidally distorted observation on our scale of perception. Precession of the Equinoxes explains all of this; there is no flat Earth. The Southern Cross is visible from southern Argentina, Africa, and Australia on any given night which is not possible on a flat Earth; stars spinning around a polar zone is not possible on a flat Earth; basic mathematics shows relative distance of the Earth to the Moon and Sun, and size of the Earth itself, using JUST parallax calculations on 2 sticks 100 miles apart during the day time. Go back to school.

[@Ali-dt9sp]

Hello :) Thank you for your video, I have a question though : The earth orbits around the sun and the sun moves through the milky way also polaris moves through its galaxy. Given that, Polaris should move. why from thousands of years Polaris is still fixed at that position ?

[@lovethenightsky5778]

Great question! And, you are correct. The pole star does change but so slowly that it doesn't affect us in our lifetime. However, the main cause of the change is Earth's long term wobble on its axis, not our solar system's journey around the Milky Way, which is an even slower journey comapred to a human lifespan. Polaris will retain its crown for the next 2000 years or so and then Gamma Cephei will take over.

[@BNew_sports_debater]

Research flat earth

[@makingyouilllegally4826]

Dome around the world... You are showing me here, that flatearthers are absolutely right

[@lancelowrey8615]

because the earth is stationary and doesnt move, the stars turn above us, so does the sun and moon.

[@vanlookenroel7211]

Your question is an illusion and therefore the answer is ; It's in the eye (I)

[@godshammer3122]

Because the stars are fixed in the sky and the entire sky turns above us while we remain fixed and Polaris is the center.

[@JacobLM42]

🤡🤡

[@extrajay4868]

Except for that pesky southern celestial pole in the center of rotation for the southern hemisphere.

[@godshammer3122]

@@extrajay4868 that makes no sense

[@extrajay4868]

@@godshammer3122 North celestial pole... South celestial pole.. How does that not make sense?

[@MellovesYah]

Amein to this truth ❤

[@dianaw4827]

Excellent video! I'm just trying to wrap my head around something; how does polaris stay in the same spot all year round if our planet is tilted and we are circling the sun? How does this star move with us around the sun whilst we are tilted?

[@Danndanny55]

Maybe because its so far away we just don’t notice such a small movement. If it was closer it would be a bigger difference.

[@jasperkensington2644]

It’s so very hard to believe you’ve been lied to your whole life by people who also believed the lies?

[@Fjshshs626]

Earth is flat with a dome above. The north pole is the center and the other stars rotate around it in the dome. If we were flying through space the stars would be totally random, this video is shit

[@freddyvandango6897]

I have a question, it has probably been asked but i still cant picture it, what does polaris’s orbit look like in the grand scheme of things? And does it orbit around the sun like the earth does? Surely with the wobble of the earth, polaris cant have a perfect orbit? It must be doing some funky movements?

[@andrewchapman3365]

flat earth explains it all

[@godshammer3122]

This does not account for stars supposedly moving independent of each other, which we never see. We only see the exact same stars in the exact same positions every night for forever.

[@seablue693]

Agree

[@michaelparsons2225]

We o v e relative with other Celestial bodies around our galaxy, stars do change over time. You can't prove they never changed, just nonsense you repeat.😊

[@godshammer3122]

@@michaelparsons2225 you dont understand, in your model they should change. It is your claim they move, prove. It.

[@michaelparsons2225]

@@godshammer3122 The stars show true north and true south they also show latitude. That's observable and proven long ago, equinoxes show due east, due west and its how we know a 365 day solar year.

[@michaelparsons2225]

@@godshammer3122 kzbin.info/www/bejne/h4m8inqnprmledUsi=APKsvBzpJ7p_uxBF Stars in the southern hemisphere looking south circling clockwise around the south Celestial pole. The stars are circling 15 degrees per hour due to globe rotation. 2 Celestial poles, 2 geographic poles, 2 points of axis. 2 Celestial poles shows true north, true south and latitude. You can't prove that wrong.

[@rodrigofigueiredo1439]

Hey friend, I'm from Brazil and I would like you to make a video with the Earth making the 14 movements it makes, along with the Polaris star that is fixed on the Earth's imaginary axis, how would it be?

[@jerkojalsovec]

During seasons earth tilt is changing. Polaris should then also change relative position to earth. And if we would film 365 days movement of polaris it wpuld do also a circle?

[@JohnHazenhousen]

No, Earth’s tilt does not change - at least not over any short period of time. It takes thousands of years for it to measurably change. And yes, if we filmed 365 days of movement, Polaris would move, but it would be almost imperceptible. This also happens in star trails, taken over the course of a night.

[@michaelparsons2225]

You can film polaris a few hours and watch its movement, it's not centre and you're forgetting about polaris Australis, the closest naked eye star to the south Celestial pole

[@mikemakuh5319]

Nice try , but it does not work! The Earth and the "solar system" cosmologic theory says they are all in dynamic movements through the "Universe" and Polaris by this theory is 323 light years from our Sun. that makes it improbable if not impossible to maintain such perfect alignment over all these past centuries.

[@melo2chill717]

U got Cognitive dissonance

[@mikemakuh5319]

@@melo2chill717 Me? Sounds more like YOU have "the vacuum of space" between your ears!

[@Bomberman66Hell]

The movement of earth around the sun is comparably irrelevant to the distance to polaris, which is lightyears away. This is the same reason mountains im the distance appear to move very little when you are moving inside your car, while foliage close by passes rapidly.

[@mikemakuh5319]

@@Bomberman66Hell Either you did not read my question or your not thinking. If I am moving in "my car"eventually the mountain is going to "go away"!

[@Bomberman66Hell]

@@mikemakuh5319 If you keep driving in a circle... it will not.

[@kongmik]

It sounds unlikely that it should be right on the axis, just as the moon always shows the same side. I think there are other explanations

[@TXS175]

It's simple! The earth is flat and polaris is the center of the world. Other theories don't make sense

[@Krookedhands]

You do realize that the south also has a center star. Northern hemisphere star trails turn counterclockwise and Southern hemisphere star trails turn clockwise proving earth is a globe

[@Newmoon19]

@@Krookedhands did you see that

[@Krookedhands]

@@Newmoon19 yea, I did

[@michaelparsons2225]

The stars in the south don't make sense to you???

[@can709]

you do not understand. At latitude near the north pole, Polaris appears directly overhead. when the observer comes to the equator, it is at the horizon. However, in both photographs, the star movement around the polaris appears circular. There are two things you need to explain. As it shifts from the pole to the equator, the polaris, the center point, will descend to the horizon, but the stellar movement will appear circular. In a flat world, the polaris must be close to the ground, otherwise the polaris cannot appear on the horizon at the equator (you know, god damn perspective 😉) however, if the polaris were that close, then the observer at the equator would see the stellar motion as an ellipse. but that's not the case, so it's wrong. If you still see this stellar movement as circular even though you have moved thousands of km, it means that you are looking directly at this center in both cases. so the polaris should be very very far away.. however, in this case too, the observer at the equator cannot see the polaris on the horizon. You cannot explain these two situations at the same time with the flat earth model.

[@failforward9589]

Good point but we are travelling TOWARDS the center of Milkyway and Polaris is also inside the milkyway, so it must be going towards the center as well BUT how does polaris maintain its place while we travel to the center of milkyway and the constellations drifts back and forth at the sky at the same season? I'm no flat earther, just thinking out loud.

[@TheRotnflesh]

The best and closest theory (which includes modern observational data across all electromagnetic spectrums) is that galaxies have their own 'electromagnetic field' generated by the spin of the central black hole. Our SagA* is spinning faster than any observed galactic core (calculated between .84 and .96 the speed of light), and thus has a heavy and powerful field; the 'refresh' for this field (where the harmonic bands cross and resonate) is called a Radcliffe Wave; this wave moves all matter along at an organized pace, like any electromagnetic field organizing energy by polarity and charge. Of course, this theory is beginning to challenge relativity (it falls under the Electric Universe concept) and is being scorned by many in the scientific community. Many would rather resolve the issues between gravity and galactic formation than admit that maybe electromagnetic fields create a collectively larger scale 'electromagnetic structure' that forms a galactic shape. Edit: I don't see any literature discussing our approach to the Sag A*, only our orbit around it. All things orbit it; this is because of the tidal distortion generated by the spin of the black hole (calculated between .84 and .96 the speed of light, a speed that exceeds most other galaxies we have observed and calculated).

[@Interesting_Placebo]

I'm with you, but "scientists" say we're spinning on an axis, revolving around the sun, circling within the milky way, while speeding through the universe as it expands. Clearly that's not the case because Polaris would not be stationary relative to anyone on earth. Moreover, it would be visible in the southern hemisphere at times.

[@JohnHazenhousen]

Polaris, like all other stars in the sky, is in the same galaxy as us and is orbiting the same galactic centre as the Sun. Earth’s orbit around the Sun is vanishingly small compared to the distance between here and Polaris. Go and stand in a field and look at a mountain in the distance. Now move 0.000001 millimetres to your left. Did the mountain appear to move? And no, Polaris should not be visible south of the equator - and it isn’t.

[@Interesting_Placebo]

@@JohnHazenhousen and without phlogiston we'd all be dead.

[@JohnHazenhousen]

🤦‍♂️

[@extrajay4868]

@@JohnHazenhousen Big distances and scale are confusing for flat Earthers.

[@kongmik]

@@extrajay4868 or we just dont bye the lie as easy as you "wooowwww, 5 billions 600 trillions 34 millions"

[@notthisnotnow2568]

You’re sight of view becomes lower because of perspective and the vanishing point. Added to that, the human eye can only see at a distance of about 4 miles. That’s why when observing the sun disappearing over the horizon you can take a telescope or digital camera and bring the sun back into the frame by zooming in on the horizon. Most people (the majority) don’t learn perspective unless they take an art class and or a film/camera class where it is relevant to academics.

[@CSXRobert]

When the sun disappears over the horizon you cannot bring it back into view by zooming in on it. It also appears you need to learn perspective. According to perspective, the horizontal distance to an object is not a linear relationship to it's angular altitude, but requires a tangent function; however, the ground distance from an observer to the north pole is a linear relationship to Polaris's angular altitude.

[@notthisnotnow2568]

@@CSXRobert well the difference between my comment and your response is I speak with experience not from written word read from Google. You probably don't even understand what you read and wrote ie. Comprehend.

[@CSXRobert]

@@notthisnotnow2568 Must be some of that flat earth "perspective" experience you're talking about. You know, where whenever someone points out an observation that can't be explained with any flat earth model, the flat earthers just say, "oh, that's perspective."

[@notthisnotnow2568]

@@CSXRobert you've resulted in name calling. Who's the theorist now

[@notthisnotnow2568]

@@CSXRobert everything I stated is a fact by my own account. Now, I don't know what the shape of the earth is. I've never been to space and science should be questionable. Otherwise it's not truthful science. I dont trust all academics for multiple reasons, including history and now academia is fucking with math. One thing I do believe in, is my experience as well as questioning authority. I've taken many art classes, studied perspective and I've caught up with the sun over the horizon using a digital camera. Nothing you or anyone says will change that, because that's my truth and my experience. Try it out with a decent camera. All I'm saying is that there's a lot of explanations that are regurgitated downstream in the name of science and not all of it make sense or can't be explained. Not to mention theories pushed as facts. Answer this one. How come comets, falling stars and such don't have a projection from the horizon up? After all we are are hurtling through a universe that's expanding whilst spinning. Those objects should be coming at us from every direction. And why are there clouds behind the moon at times? I made a short video which I recorded myself showing this phenomenon. Shouldn't be possible. Science has become the new religion and most people just believe what they're told on blind faith. That's not me. There's too much weird shit out there waiting for people like me to discover or rediscover.

[@travisfurlong7954]

What about the Earths wobble? Wouldn't that affect how Polaris is seen?

[@CSXRobert]

Yes, it does.

[@alexfarias5156]

​@@CSXRobert Polaris hasn't moved ever, globetards say it hasn't moved in thousands of years. So you're lying.

[@cristianflores2693]

Doesn’t make sense if the “Earth” is on a tilt, spinning and also rotating around the sun AND Polaris is “323 Lightyears” away according to science. Not in “the dome”

[@huffnbassist8779]

Why does this same circular pattern happen in the south and north hemisphere?

[@giovannipalermo770]

The earth tilts to form every season , but still polaris remains fixed in the Georgia guidestone always

[@marcg1686]

Our planet has a permanent tilt.

[@auset1276]

Thank you! So do other planets in our solar system also have Polaris as their north star? Or does each planet have a different north star? And does the southern part of the earth below the equator have a north star equivalent or is it too Polaris?

[@gringopotato8564]

if it does that on the nord hemisphere it should do the same with another star in the south hemisphere. Wich star on the south hemisphere does the same patern?

[@daleyule7117]

It should also be noted that as far as the seasons go, the earth itself does not wobble back and fourth. As it makes its yearly orbit around the sun the poles stay pointing the same direction, thus determining at what angle the sun's rays strike the earth. Hope that helps

[@madhatter8088]

Thanks.. I've been trying to figure out why it doesn't move with the seasons, but this makes sense.

[@WaterfrontEnt]

I’m in Arizona.. I felt like Cassiopeia was moving but the North Star Polaris wasn’t moving.. now I understand why. So how do people in the southern hemisphere navigate… do they have a southern star that is directly overhead? I mean since they can’t see Polaris?

[@JohnHazenhousen]

There is a star, Sigma Octantis, that is located _almost_ directly above the South Pole, though not quite as close to it as Polaris is to the North Pole. But it’s too faint to be used for navigation. Southern constellations, like the Southern Cross, are used instead.

[@WaterfrontEnt]

@@JohnHazenhousen Awesome! Thank you for sharing the knowledge. 👍

[@girlfromthenile8672]

Because the earth is flat and stationary?

[@sH-ed5yf]

Whatch the Video kid

[@nprbiz]

Soooo when the earth tilts at 23.5 degrees on the solstices... Yeah.. Let that percolate.

[@CSXRobert]

What do you mean ""when the earth tilts at 23.5 degrees on the solstices"? It always tilts 23.5 degrees, not just on the solstices.

[@MilkmanDarts]

Simple. Indoctrination

[@jonpfgcanlas8263]

Why do stars behave the same way if you pointed your camera offset the north star?

[@RapidRaver]

how can we see polaris from Australia? earth curvature must hide that

[@tonyornelas9374]

Polaris can be seen all the way to the 45 parallel. All stars rotate around Polaris. Polaris is in the same place in the sky during they day as it is at night but can only be seen at night. This is the verifiable proof the Earth is flat and stationary

[@xjdhdr.]

@@tonyornelas9374 Ipse Dixit fallacy. Where is your proof that Polaris can even be seen in the Southern Hemisphere, let alone "all the way to the 45 parallel" (whatever that means)? If the Earth is flat and stationary, what causes lunar eclipses (with proof)?

[@dennishall5249]

@@tonyornelas9374, no it can't. You lose sight of Polaris just a couple degrees below the equator.

[@dennishall5249]

That's true, you can't see Polaris from Australia.

[@huffnbassist8779]

Why do stars rotate around the north and the south pole?@@tonyornelas9374

[@villageid10t53]

Polaris is higher or lower in the night sky depending on the seasonal procession as well.

[@iamreiver]

Shouldn't seasonal procession point our north pole at a different star entirely? The sun sure does make a huge change of height in the sky depending on the season. Surely the center of our spin can't be pointed at the same spot/star in the sky all year round.

[@michaelparsons2225]

​@@iamreiver 2 Celestial poles, 2 points of axis, ever heard of polaris Australis?

[@tonyholohan6756]

Welcome back!. Great vid!👍👍

[@lovethenightsky5778]

Thanks Tony, it's great to be back!

[@gematriasportspicks5780]

None of the stars look like they move to me, shouldn’t all of them constantly be spinning ?

[@BLTDesign]

We live under a firmament and Polaris is at the top. 😊

[@extrajay4868]

And how does that southern celestial pole work?

[@RandyStIves]

The star is there 24/7. During the day also. Use a star app. So explain that too

[@JacobLM42]

Of course it is, lol

[@jacobcultivates]

Sounds rhetorical lol. I tried to comprehend navigation my entire life, and was even trained in the military on it and constantly got scolded for asking deeper more intuitive questions to fill in the blanks of my lack of comprehension of magnetism. After discovering the true nature of this "plane", I now perfectly comprehend navigation. What a sick joke they've played upon us.

[@JacobLM42]

@@jacobcultivates LoL Navigation is one of many things there debunks flattardia 100%.

[@extrajay4868]

Because it's aligned very closely with the globe's axis.

[@extrajay4868]

@@jacobcultivates The distances between lat and lon pretty much shut down FE.

[@anon7649]

Excellent video- thank you very much- this has been confusing me for a while, and now I understand!

[@kongmik]

Congratulation, you have been indoctrinized...if you are lucky you will get paper on it

[@michaelparsons2225]

You're still completely clueless

[@killdozer2021]

This cleared up nothing for me. I have more questions. And put the man south of the equator. Then explain it again.

[@michaelparsons2225]

Polaris does move, its 0.6 degrees off centre and its the closest naked eye star to the north Celestial pole. Polaris Australis is the closest naked eye star to the south Celestial pole.

[@wpaia]

so what happens if the earth rotates around the sun? do we different stars or it same stars and why

[@asuero_doleradolera6889]

That's a big point question now I'm old enough I understand that the Earth is flat, the solar system is lie.

[@wash36]

​@@asuero_doleradolera6889 the earth isnt flat ur parents have lied to u obviously the earth is round space is real

[@archerpro137]

Explain the 23.5 degree wobble of the earth while keeping Polaris in place

[@mranderson8146]

Do you think about the helicoidal model of our solar system ?

[@basicbreakfast]

My brain is an empty garbage bag and this makes perfect sense! TY

[@zekeharris5174]

You just made an argument for the stars being fixed circling the earth.

[@asarameka4594]

Polaris is none other than the Angel guarding the throne of God 7000 miles away

[@Troy-Moses]

Time-lapsed photos show Polaris year-round in one position with all the stars revolving around it. If this is the effect of the Earth's rotation, then Polaris (and all the stars) must be following the Earth around the Sun; otherwise, Polaris would not be seen in the same position as Earth revolves around the Sun throughout the year. Is Polaris following the Earth?

[@CSXRobert]

Polaris is so far away that you cannot see it's apparent shift in the sky due to the Earth's motion around the sun.

[@Troy-Moses]

@Elkster Eidolon Agreed... The mere fact that Polaris does not move indicates that everything revolves around earth. And if the moon is that far away, how can its gravitational pull be so strong on the oceans to cause such high tides?

[@CSXRobert]

@Elkster Eidolon So just how far is this "human range of perception" and what prevents us from seeing farther?

[@أحمدعبدالعزيز-ج2ق]

Because its location is not exactly on the center

[@extrajay4868]

You should have included a quick example of the scaled down distances of Earth's orbit and the distance to Polaris. It's amazing how many flat Earthers still post comments here which demonstrate a complete lack of understanding of this.

[@reginajohnson188]

Is there any planets near that Star 💫✨

[@sobrelaroca2701]

The universe is not what we taugth

[@MM-be3ei]

Polaris doesn't ever move that much. What is it, 1 degree every 26,000 years...?

[@thehuntersfoot4713]

In fact, Polaris is nearly one degree off the North Celestial Pole and appears to rotate in a very tiny circle.

[@LevelEarthWD]

Even still with all the earth sun galaxy movements the night sky should be different every night

[@hamzerpanzer]

​​​​@@LevelEarthWD Unfortunately, as amazing as this would be, it's simply not true. The stars are all moving around the milky way just as the solar system is, so we shouldn't expect that to make as much of a difference in the night sky as you claim. That's not even mentioning how a rotation around the milky way takes thousands of human life times to complete, so it doesn't even matter from our perspective; it would take millennia to notice any overall change. Furthermore, other stars are incredibly far away from the solar system, so our tiny little orbit around the sun BARELY influences anything about the night sky aside from the position of the sun relative to the other stars. The only thing that affects our perspective significantly is our rotation about the Earth's axis, because that's just how rotation works

[@jacksquat4140]

I'm not the brightest star in the night sky, but at 2,000,000,000,000,000 (quadrillion) miles from Earth, one would think Polaris should be seen from any point on Earth. The only way I can think to explain this, is that Polaris is much closer to Earth than we've been told or there is something impeding our view the further South we venture.

[@JohnHazenhousen]

Yes, the Earth is impeding our view south of the equator. Good job.

[@jacksquat4140]

@@JohnHazenhousen: Either the Earth is impeding our view or Polaris is much smaller, and much closer, than anticipated.

[@JohnHazenhousen]

@@jacksquat4140 No, the Earth is impeding our view. The Earth is a globe, and the southern hemisphere is pointing away from Polaris. That’s why we can’t see it south of the equator. This is very simple. Absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with Polaris’ distance from Earth.

[@jacksquat4140]

@@JohnHazenhousen : I hear what you're saying, and I've seriously considered it, but I truly don't know if the Earth is a globe, or something else. I am well aware of the official narrative, but I'm just not sure they are telling us the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. I dare say deceit is their native language.

[@JohnHazenhousen]

@@jacksquat4140 The Earth is definitely a globe. We know this for sure and there is no doubt about it at all. Anyone blessed with the gift of sight can simply go outside, look around and think about it, and come to the obvious conclusion that the Earth could not possibly be flat.

[@MIA_DaDe]

Very nice.... thanks for helping solve that mystery!

[@michaelparsons2225]

😂 how do you think we know latitude and cardinal directions? I don't see polaris.

[@hansklo1377]

Hi there. Is there the similar star seen from the southern hemisphere that is not moving?. I’m guessing it is , but what is the name of it.? Pls

[@lancelowrey8615]

No there is not, because the earth is not a globe. Look at a flat earth map and it will make more sense.

[@christopherabrams4405]

No southern central star. This guy is a distraction from ultimate truth.

[@gh0st_5]

@@lancelowrey8615 There actually is. It's called Sigma Octantis. 30 seconds of effort of searching for an answer would tell you that.

[@lancelowrey8615]

@@gh0st_5 Have you seen it? Or did the internet tell you that? I would appreciate a link to a video like this with the stars circling sigma octantis. I dont spend time searching for bull shit. The earth is flat af, use your eyes.

[@gh0st_5]

@@lancelowrey8615 The internet tells you everything you believe so what's the difference? You've never done any sort of scientific analysis. You either believe what other flat earthers have told you, or you believe something for no reason at all.

[@VideoMasterSword]

Why does polaris still stay in the same place after half a year, you would expect the location to change due to the tilt of the earth as the seasons change. kzbin.info/www/bejne/jZirnqSslJKImLM The location of polaris and the operation of seasons does not work well with the theory

[@CSXRobert]

Half a year later, the north pole is still pointing in the same direction in space.

[@outsighter2852]

Yes indeed its a good question

[@huffnbassist8779]

Why is there a circular time-lapse of stars in both the southern and northern hemispheres?

[@VideoMasterSword]

@@huffnbassist8779 Northern and Southern hemispheres we see it moving, But it does not fit with the helical model. kzbin.info/www/bejne/ZpurpKRpa8SBircsi=Otb8_FRKd3HgRpzg So why are the stars still rotating in the same location? I'm not going to answer questions if the rotations don't line up.

[@premabaul7570]

Bro.. did you get kicked out the living room?

[@tonyornelas9374]

Polaris can be seen all the way south to the 45 parallel. All stars rotate around Polaris. Polaris is in the same place in the sky during they day as it is at night but can only be seen at night. This is the verifiable proof the Earth is flat and stationary

[@geriklughart6667]

Absolutely!!!

[@richardross1166]

Um, not it can't. Why would you make a comment that's so clearly wrong, are you trying to do satire?

[@asarameka4594]

All stars are angels which circle around the throne of God Polaris is directly under the throne of God himself Earth is stationary inside the molten sea inside the temple in heaven

[@tonyornelas9374]

@@asarameka4594 that sounds about right

[@whompittoya]

Why can't people south of the equator view Polaris then?

[@darkmagician941]

the earth is flat. It is the distance to the North Pole that determines the perspective.

[@JohnHazenhousen]

Oh look, everyone! An idiot!

[@ChristopherEnoch]

The stupidity of the flat earthers in the comments make me embarrassed to be a human.

[@kongmik]

Its not easy to be indoctrinated like you

[@donallen7458]

None of the stars actually move, relative to earth. Polaris coincidentally (pun intended) is positioned nearly coincident to earths axis. Humans, traveling in the northern hemisphere of the Earth have been using this as a reference For countless millennia.

[@JohnHazenhousen]

‘Countless millennia’ = 1.5 millennia.

[@juneallan4903]

Poor Australia misses out.🌏

[@xingchao9125]

Yeah but only flat earth nutjobs can see Polaris from Australia with their magic xray vision.

[@RandyStIves]

On my app. The star is still there. Yepp . In the morning and at night

[@pdm4pdm4]

The stars move, the earth is fixed, immovable. The earth is not a globe.

[@benjaminpaulsanchez8985]

Elon needs to look into this 🤷🏽‍♂

[@Beacon80]

Can you settle a really stupid bet for me? At one point, you say that all the other stars circle Polaris. You're only referring to stars in the northern sky, right?

[@he7is7at7hand]

Nice. Such a simple illustration to help us get it. Thanks. The southern hemisphere has a similar thing. These stars show us the world is a globe. The stars are much farther out there and the world is much bigger, and the atmosphere is only "like" a dome, but the point is the same.

[@kongmik]

Trust it... some $$experts$$ agrees with you

[@IsmaelTruth]

This explanation doesn’t make sense, because the earth is not spinning in 1 place The earth is rotating around the sun. Supposedly. So if it has to rotate around the sun for 100s of millions of miles, wouldn’t that put us out of alignment with Polaris?

[@Bomberman66Hell]

Polaris is lightyears away and the movement of earth around the sun is comparably irrelevant.

[@ernestovillavert2017]

How come on the southern pole you still see Polaris. if the earth is a globe that is impossible. But that can be explained if the earth is a flat.

[@jaythardin]

That was really good. Thanks

[@tnaccountability7455]

You are 100% incorrect

[@noneofyourbusiness4022]

This man is making a hell of a case that the earth is flat wtf🤯

[@JohnHazenhousen]

It might seem that way if you don’t know what you’re talking about.

[@JacobLM42]

Only if you are extremely stupid.

[@jacobcultivates]

@@JohnHazenhousen Come on bro that's a real substance lacking comment that makes it seem like you definitely don't know what you're talking about because you said nothing :D If you comprehend navigation, you'll comprehend some other things, then you'll know what you're talking about and can come to an educated conclusion ;D

[@JohnHazenhousen]

@@jacobcultivates There are _two_ celestial poles, not one. That is not possible on a flat Earth and it only makes sense if Earth is a globe.

[@jacobcultivates]

@@JohnHazenhousen Why isn't the second celestial pole equally visible in its dominance in accordance to what everyone sees? The globe model makes no sense in so many ways. I was trained in navigation in the military, and I've been on multiple flights throughout my time in the military. Not only did I have the experience to be trained in navigation while having to unravel all of its nonsensical ways of working, I also have plenty of experience looking at the earth from the sky above, and it's clearly a flat plane that we live on. I'm guessing your sources are more from television and internet, rather than real life experience and application of simple obvious logic.

[@paultogneri9783]

Ever heard the saying......"Wandering Stars"????

[@CSXRobert]

Yes, it refers to planets.

[@gnzlsdebra1064]

Can people see Polaris from Australia? If so, then how?

[@dennishall5249]

Nope.

[@Bomberman66Hell]

They cannot. Flat earthers seethe over this.

[@xingchao9125]

That just destroyed flat earthers yet again.

[@HollomanUFOLanding]

Welcome back and a great easy to understand demonstration!

[@lovethenightsky5778]

Thanks for such a kind comment! It's great to be back and I hope to keep publishing at a decent rate now.

[@christeeny99]

Fabulous explanation! Thank you

[@lovethenightsky5778]

You're very welcome!

[@-RawX-]

Except earth " moves " in more than one way by the globe theory

[@extrajay4868]

No, it only moves in a single direction at any given moment. The direction changes though, sure.

[@walterwilmoth8390]

Polaris does not stay still lol

[@markwelsh9068]

Random, non astronomical observation: I have the same stair carpet as you! lol

[@conspiracyFoxe]

Wow and they said giants don't exist,

[@christiand7437]

Now explain how Polaris stays in the same place as if it's nailed down....while we are flying thru the galaxy @ 500,000 mph? It would be a blurry mess and never in one place!🤔

[@eatthepoor6479]

The scale of the universe

[@Glenntoughts]

If the earth is a sphere theres also a south star,...

[@extrajay4868]

Which there is.

[@sophiafakevirus-ro8cc]

We are on flat earth, stationary, not in outer space, the heavens revolve around us. Polaris is over the North Pole which is in the centre of the earth.

[@JohnHazenhousen]

So how is there a second celestial pole?

[@sophiafakevirus-ro8cc]

@@JohnHazenhousen I know how this goes, I' answer your question then you ask another, repeat ad nauseum. If you want to find out about flat earth do your own research. I can tell you there are answers for everything you want to throw at your despised flerfers, but bear in mind none of us humans really know anything. I've spent 12 years being abused, I don't argue flat earth any more, I know it is fruitless. I had to make my statement because this video is wrong.

[@JohnHazenhousen]

@@sophiafakevirus-ro8cc I have looked into flat earth, that's how I know it's complete nonsense that only the most ignorant and gullible will fall for. You _can't_ answer my question. No flat earthers can, because there could not possibly be a second celestial pole on a flat earth. That's why I have been blocked and had all my comments removed by some of the most prominent KZbin flat earthers for even asking about it.

[@starlust.]

Great explanation - well done!

[@lovethenightsky5778]

Thanks StarLust, I'm pleased it all made sense!

[@sectureverothoughtcriminal7734]

Umm...NOT. Epic Fail. According Muh Science the Earth WOBBLES on It's AXIS thus creating the seasons. How the HELL does a star that is supposedly 434 light years from Earth...match the wobble so precisely while the Earth circles around our Sun, our solar system cruises through the Milky Way and the Milky Way zooms through an ever expanding universe? How many thousands of light years would Polaris have to move and and at what speed back and forth through the galaxy?

[@ranulfocastillo5355]

Thank you for sharing!

[@blackhawklue]

I like when he says " imagine the sky is a dome, w stars inside it like pinpricks." Uhh, u mean like the bible's description of the 'molten firmament of heaven, containing the stars'? And then when he said 'it looks like the stars spin around polaris ( like an axis) and the earth is still.' Umm, again, like the bible's description of earth being 'firmly fixed, unmoving on it's foundations'? If it looks like a flat plane, remains still like a flat plane, and the dome revolves over the flat plane, maybe it's a flat plane!

[@CSXRobert]

I suppose you're referring to Psalm 104:5, "He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved."(NIV) The Hebrew word translated as foundations is makon - a fixed or established place, foundation. The Earth's established place is it's orbit around the sun and it can not be moved from it. If the Earth were a flat plane with the stars rotating around it, we would not be able to see both the northern celestial pole and the southern celestial pole from the surface of the earth. For the northern celestial pole to be above the earth to be visible the southern celestial pole would have to be below the earth and vice versa.

[@maximumswag]

If I do live in a dome, I want to get out. I love and believe in God but I refuse to live in a dome. I don't care if humanity ends up tearing a hole in the sky, I want out

[@Gegooberb]

Love you vid very interesting

[@traveetravee]

thank you so much

[@lovethenightsky5778]

Welcome 😊

[@strawmannhonda529]

Stop gate keeping.. flat earth is all there is. Get right dood..

[@NTL00]

Thank you😊

[@iamreiver]

This doesn't make any sense when you consider how Earth is supposedly supposed to tilt it's poles towards or away from the sun depending on the season. That tilt should make different stars our north star at different times of the year.

[@CSXRobert]

That's because the tilt of the earth is pointing in the same direction in space. For example, if I'm facing you and I walk in a half circle around you continuing to face in the same direction then I will end up facing away from you. In the same way, when the Earth's axis is tilted toward the sun, it's pointing toward the same point in space (well, very nearly the same point, on a cosmic scale) as it is 6 months later when it's tilted away from the sun.

[@alexfarias5156]

​@Robert Maples The movement of earth around the sun is not just one mile is millions of miles so that alone would make polaris move.

[@poppyozark]

Great video. Thanks

[@theerepenterakatheecomfort277]

So by your own words when the fiction globe tilts it wouldnt continue stationary cuz it would move like the but it doesn't go die nup

[@yunk9]

Oh dear.

[@JakShiit]

You can see the north star anywhere in the world .......because we are on a FE ......duhhhhhhh !!

[@JohnHazenhousen]

No, you can’t.

[@stevencosnyka7698]

Ridiculous you don't account for other alleged movements other than rotation lol

[@raydamageinc.6331]

So..... Mr. Love, care to chime in on the shit show you created after time to think about 2 motions & 1 light trail direction ?

[@antoniocarlospires8421]

Se a terra da uma voltinha completa em torno do do Sol e a estrela polar não sai do lugar essa explicação é à inclinação no próprio eixo também é esforço pra continuar à mentiras.

[@paradox11fef48]

tottaly wrong

[@AWMul]

Other stars might see this, delete quicki

[@rubinbesureis9943]

So one suppose to reject the most obvious and logical explanation of this so called phenomenon and instead listen to a far out, equation based theory and pretend it makes more sense?

[@82christos]

If people are so stupid as to not understand that a spinning disc has a stationary center point then we are f'd. I've never seen so many flat earthers commenting in one video. A primary school kid can understand this, yet they reject it and propose the most outlandish shit

[@sherazquraishi8810]

Marvelous

[@FaithwalkerTodd]

It's amazing how close Polaris is to the Earth.