Watch the next part of this video here - kzbin.info/www/bejne/bqOriKesf9uSj8k
@motherisape Жыл бұрын
True bro
@BabuLohar-sm1nj4 ай бұрын
Love the way u talk,ur logics. Where r u from? Would like to connect with you. How can I?
@Ethics98213 ай бұрын
Jo hindu Upanishads hai usme guru aur shishya ke beech jo sawal jawab hua hai woh likha hai. Bad mai logo ko aasan language mai maz aaye iske liye story form banaya. log dharam follow kre issliye devo/god ki concept aaiye. Agar log adharam ke tare kese jiye tho accha nahi hoga.
@pm_91_ Жыл бұрын
Hindu atheist is like a girl who says I love you but as a friend.
@Praveenkumar-ul1mj5 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@thesage20805 ай бұрын
Yes
@Anand-qj2jy5 ай бұрын
😂😂😂
@anonymous931555 ай бұрын
well, atheism is quite flexible so you don't have to be rigid about your thoughts and can be open about ideologies. So Hindu atheism makes sense to me
@DistantDreamer8924 ай бұрын
@@anonymous93155 no hindu atheism does not make any sense. most of are hindu apologetics
@scienceisdope2 жыл бұрын
Why did KZbin not send me a notification? 😢
@scienceisdope2 жыл бұрын
I've tried reading Hitchens's book. But his writing is not as good as his speeches
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
Who knows. Press bell icon maybe?
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
@@scienceisdope His writing is very reference laden. Maybe that is why.
@TheNevillelobo2 жыл бұрын
@@scienceisdope I prefer Richard Dawkins to Hitchens but maybe its cause I found his work, especially The God Delusion, to be very accessible as a layman.
@Mayank-Pawar5 ай бұрын
It is not a Hindu Athiest but Nastik Philosophy like Jain Darshan, Buddhist Philosophy, Charvakas which reject the authorities of Vedas!
@Namish-yv9mz3 ай бұрын
And Vedas have themselves raised a question on god haven't they 😅. Do Hindus today have the guts to do that . Can they question the narrative that society has set ? I guess no. In this case they should learn from their own text how to question lol
@umangdama46552 ай бұрын
Jain and Buddhist is not athiest philosophy.
@spuriusscapula48292 ай бұрын
Jains and Buddhists call themselves "Hindus"? Never heard of that before.
@sorenutpal6091Ай бұрын
Don't think of Buddhism as part of Hindu terminologies, when Hinduism largely plagarized from Mahayan Buddhism
@bishalchetri43812 жыл бұрын
I don't think everyone becomes atheist to look or sound hippie...There are many who can think rationality and scientifically and conceptualize an understanding of how things works around us...People who became atheist for the sake of becoming an atheist are techically religious folks who are just upset with the god for not listening to their prayers..
@cheekoomagar44482 жыл бұрын
yea true but don't call them religious they are mostly anti god
@user-eo1vk2 жыл бұрын
Testo haina bhai Different scenarios,conditions hunxa Taile vaneko pani kunai case ma thik hola
@cauliflowerhead2735 Жыл бұрын
Yes of course not everyone thinks like that but a lot of people do
@hiruzenmonofuke734410 ай бұрын
Hindu atheists aren't people who give themselves that tag because they become atheist to look cool or hippie. That's a complete misunderstanding of the phenomenon.
@hcs_hipagurugram1060 Жыл бұрын
I don't believe in god. But I am Hindu culturally. I have strong emotional affinity with 'hinduness'. I will take 7 circles around the fire when I will marry. I will be burnt in a pyre when I die. I sometimes go to the temple whenever I m with someone and visiting a place. I celebrate festivals. And I also have an affinity to my caste identity. But I consider all castes to be equal. I don't understand what has a belief in god to do with caste. And yes, I am a so called 'upper caste'. Tribalism is a basic human instinct. Caste is just that, a tribe and an entity. Belief in god is not intricately linked to caste identity. But as far as Hinduism is concerned, I put it above my caste identity and below my national identity. And I feel lucky to be born in a hindu family and culture because it gave me the freedom to think anyway I want. Charvak philosophy is something I am interested in but haven't read about. It seems interesting though. Jai Hind 🇮🇳
@hiruzenmonofuke734410 ай бұрын
Advaita vedanta is more philosophical and rational and talks about the metaphysical nature of reality. Also has had a strong atheistic tradition. You should check that out.
@JANTAGIRI7 ай бұрын
God, you are disillusioned 😅
@amolkhobaragade5 ай бұрын
You're a casteist if you believe caste is an integral part of your identity.
@Love-wz4vg5 ай бұрын
@@amolkhobaragade he is nationalist too better than anti nationals like you
@pratikashranjande78335 ай бұрын
Nationalist and anti national are not the only two options
@vatsalraval2 жыл бұрын
Atheism just means , not believing in God thn half of Indic Philosophies are Nir-ishwarwadi ! Even most famous Advāita Vedant or Uttar Mimansa has concept of Nirgunā Brahmā and Sagunā Brahmā ! And agree these cool kids who are just wannabe use these terms like AthEisTs
@spuriusscapula48292 жыл бұрын
Can you define the word "Hindu"?
@VikuMonu5 ай бұрын
@@spuriusscapula4829 hindu is not a religion, this is a geographical demarcation, this word coined by thousands of years a ago by Greeks who came to the Indian subcontinent for trade.
@VikuMonu5 ай бұрын
@@spuriusscapula4829 bro read history, Aj ke londe cool banne ke liye santan deities ko gali dete hai disrespect karte hai
@pratikashranjande78335 ай бұрын
Nirishwarbaadi is Non theist not Atheist
@Namish-yv9mz5 ай бұрын
And the brhmn that they talk about is definitely not the creator diety Brahma-dev that theistic Hindus talk about right ?
@sankalpshrivastava1103 Жыл бұрын
Athiest means the one who recects the concept of God , If someone does not believe in God but still attached to the values which is inherent in hindu culture and tradition then he can consider himself a hindu athiest and nothing wrong in that .
@y1.5 Жыл бұрын
If you say Hindu.. you already believe in God. Cuz you come in varna system and your varna came from God itself
@shrin21011 ай бұрын
@@y1.5 Varna system alone cannot define a person is Hindu or not. Philosophy of Indian subcontinent is Hinduism, previous generation changed the name of philosophy to "Hinduism", Current generation believes in scientists and disagrees with some part of religios practices but like to follow as a part of their forefather's culture and to maintain unique traditions for future generations Bcoz extreme Atheism is boring.
@hiruzenmonofuke734410 ай бұрын
@@y1.5 hindu philosophy predates varna.
@lovelle2634 ай бұрын
@@y1.5varna is in manusmriti wgivh we clearly know were written by brahmins under kings. It was given authority by saying its gods word even tho its not. This is why caste system was banned and was accepted by guru and rishi as well. Rishimunis whomwrote veds did not write about varna.
@lovelle2634 ай бұрын
@@y1.5varna system was a political move
@dipmalyagantait47162 жыл бұрын
Have to criticize certain points, Charvaka aren't the only Atheists. Please pick any book on Introductory Indian Philosophy and take a look.. Purva Mimansa and Samkhya also are Non-theistic. They deny existence of a creator God. Bouddha and Jaina does too.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
I know. This video, was about Charvak appropriation. I will get to the other schools one day. Stay tuned.
@dipmalyagantait47162 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh oh ok. Actually I found some more Atheistic schools. The Ajivika school, The Grammarian school, the Medicinal school.
@vardhanarya2 жыл бұрын
they dont fit into his agenda ,thats why he hasnt talked about them
@Dhruv-Kumar Жыл бұрын
@@vardhanarya 😂😂 👌👌👌
@thedarkknight9335 Жыл бұрын
You can call yourself a hindu athiest but in todays sense it is oxymoronic. Yes hinduism has athiestic school of thought. Also charvakas are also mentioned in bhirandikya upanishad.
@rahul276682 жыл бұрын
Christopher Hitchens was the final nail on my head of beliefs that made me an atheist..what a guy
@pauldirc.. Жыл бұрын
Brother may you give me what arguments persuaded you most for atheism in points
@SKEPTICsss Жыл бұрын
@@pauldirc.. middleman arguement
@Pasdpawn Жыл бұрын
There will be another enlightenment in your journey once you will realize where hitchens was coming from. The arguments he made are not unique at all and can only make sense to a world confined by abhrahamic thought. You will know one day that that atheism isn’t necessarily the same
@rahul27668 Жыл бұрын
@@Pasdpawn I may not everything he said but his arguments of religion are very logical
@Pasdpawn Жыл бұрын
@@rahul27668 absolutely. But those are simply “duh” arguments specially for those who are eastern religion followers. I dig sam harris more tho
@ApoorvSaurabh6 ай бұрын
I am a Hindu (geographically, culturally & philosophically, NOT religiously) I am a Hindu but Hinduism is Not my religion I am a Hindu still I don’t have a religion I am a Hindu & I am an Agnostic Athiest
@DistantDreamer8925 ай бұрын
do u vote for bjp?
@ApoorvSaurabh5 ай бұрын
@@DistantDreamer892 no
@kjaideep4 ай бұрын
@@ApoorvSaurabh who do you vote then is it Congress?
@ApoorvSaurabh4 ай бұрын
@@kjaideep no CPI
@Saujas4 ай бұрын
How is that even a question?@@DistantDreamer892
@sutradhar75682 жыл бұрын
That kushal mehra guy proclaims himself to be an hindu atheist. Never questions hindu religion, Vedas, karma, or any effing thing. I hope he gets your message.BTW Grt podcast. I hope ur channel grows
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Deepankar!
@vaishs3852 жыл бұрын
Even druv rathi. I don't get who is an hindu atheist. Calling himself an Indian atheist makes more sense.
@ayushkumarsinha99592 жыл бұрын
Who said he doesn't question vedas or karma or anything? I've followed him very long and he had clearly said many times he doesn't believe in any of them because they don't have scientific validity
@Versatileabhi2 жыл бұрын
@@ayushkumarsinha9959 Then why he calls himself as Hindu ?
@SanketGajera2 жыл бұрын
Read more!
@AnuragKumar-ve3fv Жыл бұрын
So calling oneself hindu atheist is problematic cos it doesnt feel like being a rebel ? Also making a separate atheist ummah is necessary? Charvaka called themselves materialist cos they knew the core of every indian religion is spirualism. They wanted to differentiated themselves st the core.
@Dhruv-Kumar Жыл бұрын
Exactly and hinduism (Sanatana Dharma) and Indian culture are deeply interwined. Say Diwali. Diwali is cultural pot of India but at the same it is religous. Now I want to be athiest. I don't believe in gods and also not in Rama . But I don't want to leave diwali because its my culture. I don't want to disbelieve in Rama perhaps I would still chose to worship him as a good human being of his time. I may also chant Hare Rama Hare Krishna. This is what my ancients have been doing for millenia. I don't want to abondon the kirtan bhajan because I like them. I don't want to stop listening to songs of Hindu gods because it gives me a peace of mind. And if I do all of those, I won't be called "athiest" by western standard anymore. So a Hindu athiest or Sanatani Nastik is one like me. And besides that as I said, There are many Sanatani Nastik sects. So Sanatani Nastik has every logic and rights to call her/himself as Sanatani Nastik.
@blahblahanything Жыл бұрын
@@Dhruv-Kumar yeah this is not so called as hindu atheism,this is called as you didn't find any logic in believing in God at the same time you didn't want to leave your religion because it was your religion since birth(this is called childhood indoctrination)
@Dhruv-Kumar Жыл бұрын
@@blahblahanything there are many athiests in west who still have proper christmas and easter. Athiests may chose to do whatever they enjoy they are not bound.
@blahblahanything Жыл бұрын
@@Dhruv-Kumar celebrating religious festival, listening religious song,etc isn't a problem,but praying God even knowing he/she didn't exist is definately not atheism,you just don't want to leave your religion so you claim yourself hindu atheist. You said you don't believe in god's and in Rama,and then you said I could still worship him as he was a good human at his time,this clearly shows you finding no logic in worshipping God but still you don't want to leave your religion. You said atheists in west celebrate Christmas but do they worship God saying "I don't believe in God but still I worship him because I love the teachings of Jesus"?
@Dhruv-Kumar Жыл бұрын
@@blahblahanything its like bts fan girls who kind of admires bts. So yes makes sense here aswell. So I admire Rama and his team cooperation. Worshipping means to be like him or admiring him. Unless you say bts fans follow bts religion and other related things.
@milindphadnis39902 жыл бұрын
So according to you Indian teenagers started calling themselves atheists only because three or four western atheists made the term "atheism" popular and "hip" as you call it? Is this not pure anecdotal evidence, something that an atheist who loves rationality should avoid? Don't Indian teenagers have a brain of their own? If you started calling yourself an Indian atheist seemingly out of your thirst for knowledge, what makes you feel others are not similarly seeking knowledge due to their personal life struggles? I think it is incredibly condescending on your part to say that Indian youth are someone who blindly follow westerners and that too on topics that require a drastic restructuring of thought processes.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
Many did. Many didn't. I never said every single person did that. Please don't misrepresent my views or you will get banned.
@milindphadnis39902 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh The desire for banning people who disagree with you indicates a very high level of intolerance, something that a rational atheist should desist from doing. However, feel free to ban me whenever you want. I will take it sportingly. But when doing so ask yourself if you are feeling triggered by simple questions. How then will you present unbiased opinions to the outside world? Only small immature kids talk about "cancel culture" and "bans"! The best atheist channels on YT (should I recommend some to you?) are very openminded and allow others to challenge the host's opinions.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the generic "be open minded" advice. But my point was about you lying about my views. You want open-minded discussion? Ask open-minded questions. Don't just outright lie and then expect a discussion. I do a live stream twice a week where I talk face to face with people who agree as well as disagree with me. So there is no question of being not open minded. That you would make that a point without addressing the fact that you lied about my views, says more about you than me.
@milindphadnis39902 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh I did not lie about your views. It is you who lie about my views about you. But you are finding it hard to accept it now given that I have explained the importance of not banning people who disagree. But you go ahead and do whatever you like. Its a free world.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
I did not say that every Indian teenager started calling themselves an atheist because of books by Dawkins and others. You said that I did say so. Therefore, you lied. And now you are running away because I called you out on it. That's the summary of what happened. And I think it is plainly visible that you have not been banned. But you will be, if you continue to lie. And thanks for informing me that this is a free world where I can do whatever I want. I was thinking till now that I need your permission to do things.
@jimit80185 ай бұрын
If vimoh would have been a muslim atheist then probably he wouldn't be alive we should acknowledge the fact that hindus or sanatanis accepted atheism.
@vimoh5 ай бұрын
The thing that protects me is India being secular. Not your religion. If the Constitution didn't grant me safety, you guys would have comitted the same kind of violence people in Islamic states do.
@Curiosity4035 ай бұрын
@@vimoh Please sir make a video on Sharia-Bolshevism. I found a Reddit channel and found this interesting and want to know more about it. I think as an Atheists we should popularise this concept
@Curiosity4035 ай бұрын
@@vimoh I know it will be little political but just for curiosity
@kjaideep4 ай бұрын
@@vimoh Mocking your own religion seems like being immature lol
@lovelle2634 ай бұрын
@@vimohthats a lie. Many Indian muslims have been beheaded for being ex-muslims or announcing that they don belive in allah. So yeah its sanatan who keeps u alivs as an atheist not secularism
@Pallunotfound6 ай бұрын
It hilarious how people say adding hindu to atheist is beliving in god and then proceed to add Indian which itself is greek name originating out of hindu this is what happens when you want to sound like a rebel, there are also atheist that used to be christian that celebrate christmas its a cultural thing , you are misinformation at its best
@Nishxnt_Y4 ай бұрын
yeah but they don't call themselves 'Christian Atheist', do they? You don't need to be a 'Hindu Atheist' to celebrate Diwali or other cultural festivals.
@Pallunotfound4 ай бұрын
@@Nishxnt_Y bro that istn the point i couldnt careless what they call themselves i was just stating that hindu and india come from the same word indus so it is linked either way they are fixated on saying why we shouldnt be called hindu atheist and proceed to name indian atheist also about the christian thing because no country is named after the culture or to be more specific religion as mush as i know Ingnore the grammar and mistakes This is not my mother toungue
@spuriusscapula48292 ай бұрын
@@Pallunotfound Is a Muslim or Christian in India a Hindu?
@Pallunotfound2 ай бұрын
@@spuriusscapula4829 they do not call themselves indian athiest is a very good side note
@spuriusscapula48292 ай бұрын
@@Pallunotfound ex-Muslim or ex-Christian atheists do exist, right?
@Shortfeedinfo2 жыл бұрын
Hindu atheism is like : Eating chicken and being a vegan. As For so called Hindu Atheist Just because Ancient hindu society accepted Atheist doesn't not mean Atheism is a part of it Just liking speaking English doesn't make me a British
@shubhamswaraj15572 жыл бұрын
No it's not that... Hinduism is a way of life not a philosophy... Hinduism is a culture not an ideology.... Hinduism supports polytheism, monotheism, atheism and agonism .... So you can be a Hindu atheist
@glkglkglkglk91932 жыл бұрын
@@shubhamswaraj1557 the most generic whitewashing
@hey01732 жыл бұрын
@@shubhamswaraj1557 so ur saying that hinduism is not a religion but a set of different cultures and religions?
@stoicstone5212 жыл бұрын
@@hey0173 yeah , I think so . It's a cultural identity for me , not my faith
@SanketGajera2 жыл бұрын
@@glkglkglkglk9193 read more!
@zawwin24322 жыл бұрын
i dont care who you are life run by work not by lecture
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
What a completely useless comment.
@skeptic25612 жыл бұрын
What if lecturing is your work What if you are a proffesor or a content creator on youtube or a parent 😅lol
@kjaideep4 ай бұрын
@@vimoh and what a completely useless your videos are if you have your views about hinduism keep it with you don't just bark
@kjaideep4 ай бұрын
@@skeptic2561 without working how can they become proffesor or a content creator on youtube or a parent lol think before replying
@Lozzymee21 күн бұрын
Go and tell your so called hindu Baba's
@Saif_guidence5 ай бұрын
Wats caste to did with it 😂
@Sanathana72 жыл бұрын
You had no point! No dog in the fight
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
what?
@aasthaagrawal12882 жыл бұрын
This singular focus on the Charvaka tradition is a bit absurd. It isn't really the only Hindu philosophic tradition that was atheistic. There were quite a few other ones such as the Ajivika philosophy(which also rejected the vedas) and Samakhya(which is non-theistic but accepts the vedas). While we can debate forever on whether these philosophical tradiitons can be considered "Hindu", it is certain that there was space for Hindu atheists to exist. Moreover, the whole antithetical nature of atheism and religion is an Abrahamic concept.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
None of the ones you mentioned are Hindu philosophies. They were Vedic philosophies. There was no Hinduism then. Hence, for Hinduism to claim them is appropriation.
@aasthaagrawal12882 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh That is an intriguing perspective. How do you define Hinduism?
@rakeshbarman34862 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh by your logic why call it Hinduism, how did you gave it that name , hindu word is given by someone else , so don't play with terms we all know all those philosophies were there and it's funny how you are trying to abrahmize deliberately or I don't know, trying to prove a binary and separate ot from sanatan philosophy
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
@@rakeshbarman3486 Who cares where the name came from. All I care about is what it means now.
@jiraiyasensei9022 жыл бұрын
@@rakeshbarman3486 dont believe these goons forign funded delusional and propagandists person.
@peace66462 жыл бұрын
Hinduism was not a single religion in past.the present day hinduism is group religions and castes that existed in india.britishers coined the word hinduism .
@cauliflowerhead27352 жыл бұрын
Just bcz the Hindu demography is divided into countless feuding sects doesn't make hinduism a "group of religions". It is still a single religion even if the followers may be spread across different incompatible castes. Those castes still follow the same books, gods and authority figures.
@mr.anonymous71142 жыл бұрын
Absolutely.
@hiruzenmonofuke734410 ай бұрын
A concept such as religion did not even exist before, calling Hinduism a group of religions is just wrong.
@NewTypeStarling5 ай бұрын
@@hiruzenmonofuke7344 fr fr
@NewTypeStarling5 ай бұрын
@@cauliflowerhead2735 yes you are right
@fareehafaiyyaz84752 жыл бұрын
Tysm for this ,as fellow atheist. Hindu atheism always seemed problematic. Atheism rejects all ideologies and existence of God . No exceptions.
@mr.anonymous71142 жыл бұрын
Hindu athiesm means a person who don't believe in god but live his life with some moral ethics. So I revomment you that know before talk.
@spuriusscapula48292 жыл бұрын
@@mr.anonymous7114 Moral ethics? What moral ethics?
@berserk3222 жыл бұрын
@@mr.anonymous7114 Being a theist or atheist has no relation with having ethics or morals, it strictly relates to believe or disbelieve in the existence of God. The existence of god or following religion is not a measure for judging morals. If you read enough you'll understand the morality in religious books are more screwed.
@aldahrishi47952 жыл бұрын
Nope athiestm means you just don't believe in God that is it... Religion can also be based on athiesm Yes hindu athiest are fuelling radical hindutva which is problematic and dangerous for democracy you are right with this thing. I am non hindu by the way...
@ankurmishra9923 Жыл бұрын
Wikipedia compiles the definition of religion as : Religion is usually defined as a social-cultural system of designated behaviors and practices, morals, beliefs, worldviews, texts, sanctified places, prophecies, ethics, or organizations, that generally relates humanity to supernatural, transcendental, and spiritual elements; however, there is no scholarly consensus over what precisely constitutes a religion. So, If Hinduism is a religion and religion is defined as such and If such socio-cultural and other elements from a wide spectrum of elements of the Hindu society of India are still a part of our lives then we may very well be a Hindu-Atheist/Hindu-Agnostic-Atheist
@prashantgodara392310 ай бұрын
This video wasn't straight forward. Your point got lost somewhere. I came back to this video after Dhruv Rathee just called himself Hindu Atheist in his recent video. But in your video, i couldn't clearly figure out why Hindi Atheist is a dishonest term or why you don't call yourself hindu Atheist.
@sorenutpal6091Ай бұрын
It is a Political deminance strategy term to manipulate real atheist
@psychologicalboss Жыл бұрын
Wait. why as a ex-hindu would you call yourself an atheist, when the theo or deus is a christian idea, different from hinduism. Its like making dal with ghee and tadka and calling it 'lentil stew with clarified butter and spice infusion'.
@vimoh Жыл бұрын
Same reason you just used the word "ex". We are both using English. If I was speaking in Hindi, I would have said Nastik. These are commonly understood words that are used for convenience.
@psychologicalboss Жыл бұрын
@@vimoh The epistomology used to reach this concept is different in Christian and Hindu perspectives. English might be used for convenience. but when an idea is being ironed out, Language and the culture its emerging out of is important. There is a reason why muslims use arabic terms to describe their concepts and don't used its English analogues officially.
@vimoh Жыл бұрын
I am using English. So are you. Case closed.
@kannadafactstar Жыл бұрын
Hindu/sanatani athiesm can be a lot different brother!! Been athiest from last 4 years, don't know why u brought only hindu uppar class caste?? (Smells some leftist agenda here) Hindu athiesm also represents that u may be inspired from the stories (ramayana, mahabharata) ,or characters (gods) , or meditation (not devotional) , yoga or any sutras u found relevant.. Also as u said, even i said that, i don't believe in any guru (no one gave a f) , i said i don't believe in karma as u believe (i believe in different karma) ,, i always said the caste system will end as you guys end, and most of them never read vedas(99%) so actually no hindu gives a f.... I think u hate the word hindu itself, so you just making up some stuffs to prove yourself
@anon3191 Жыл бұрын
Calling yourself Indian atheist is as stupid is calling yourself Hindu athesit! Atheism is a philosophical/ontological stand on reality. It has nothing to do with nationality
@vimoh Жыл бұрын
Please see my video on Indian Atheism.
@ayushkumarsinha99592 жыл бұрын
My point is, lets say i identify myself as a Charvaka ( i have serious issues with the term atheist as i believe it too have roots in abrahmism) i don't believe in anything beyond the five senses and anything that is immaterial, but because i was born and brought up in this culture, i like celebrate festivals, perform rituals and so on, doesn't matter they mean anything or not. And i like to call myself a Materialist who is culturally hindu, as in one who doesn't believe the ideas but like following them because it gives a certain amount of peace to mind.
@sqrt-16462 жыл бұрын
Abrahmism was always against Atheism; how does it have roots in it?
@carvakalokayata2 жыл бұрын
Culture always changes see 100 yrs back and see now.
@ayushkumarsinha99592 жыл бұрын
@Human Being yes but that's the thing right, with hinduism you don't exactly know where the culture religion philosophy sciences that developed alongside begun and end, they are so interconnected that way
@ayushkumarsinha99592 жыл бұрын
@@sqrt-1646 that is in the sense that neo atheism has the same idea of tolerance that the abrahmic religions had
@Versatileabhi2 жыл бұрын
@@ayushkumarsinha9959 Words can get confusing..A.medical doctor also writes Dr .same by a phd holder.. So one can't be used interchangeably. A muslim can also say he likes to celebrate eid and do fasting etc. But that would not make him muslim. Instead of Hindu culture you can call it Bharitiya sanskriti or Indian culture..
@kartikforwork4 ай бұрын
i think people call themself as hindu atheist as they follow some things that can (also) be termed as hindu practice. like say not eating non veg food, and other moral things. they sometimes visit temples with their friend and family and has no problem having tika and kalava celebrating festivals with others but still don't believe any god. by ur logic u sound like that even saying ram ram to someone as greeting u will consider them as non atheist.
@MrSayon20 Жыл бұрын
I have watched a lot of your videos in the last few days and the biggest point I take away is the construction and progression of your arguments. I think it's something to be learnt and practiced.
@vivash80682 жыл бұрын
Wonderful video Vimoh. Very insightful. I few questions was raised though. 1. Can a Hindu claim himself to be a "Hindu atheist" to a western/Abrahamic atheistic thought? 2. If the term losses its validity under the Indian perspective, then in what sense would you attach the word Athiest for yourself wouldn't it be better to call yourself Carvaka or someone from other Atheistic schools of thought? and lastly, 3. it's not related to this video but what is the response to the question of moral /ethical theory for materialists such as Carvakas?
@aceheart5828 Жыл бұрын
Are you saying you are an Atheist who is not Caste oriented etc etc or United with other Hindu's against Muslims... . ( Because that would be something..... ) Or You are an independent free thinker..... .... Till it comes to those Muslims.....
@desi_anarch2 жыл бұрын
I Highly doubt except for upper caste and well off hindus nobody knows about all this charvaka stuff. Their position is same as most aam aadmiz -Pascal's Wager
@kapilbisht18112 жыл бұрын
Dayanand Saraswati destroyed this carvaka philosophy
@VishalYadav000033 ай бұрын
I was thinking for more than a month that what god is, how it works, how moksha will happen and where is the soul of god to whose soul our human soul connects after moksha,, then I tried to find the reality on phone 📱 then I came across various theists and various atheist content creators, theists were a hundred times more popular but athiests made a 100 times more sense.. i have some disagreements even with athiests but yeah, athiests really make sense
@tattvamashi8 ай бұрын
You should Debate with Acharya prashant 🥱
@khali-pili5 ай бұрын
Haven't you thought about yourself a little bit more than required?
@battlerushiromiya6512 жыл бұрын
The thing about the charvaka is that most of what we know about them is from criticism of their thoughts by Vedic schools of thought. The point about atheism and Hindu atheism being a privilege is quite true, your atheism, even rejecting the vedas, rejecting karma is tolerated only so far as you keep caste. Once you cross that threshold even your privilege can't save you, and your chances of ending like Pansare,Lankesh and Kalaburgi are extremely high.
@arjyachatterjee6874 Жыл бұрын
Who are Pansare and Kalaburgi ?
@hiruzenmonofuke734410 ай бұрын
Caste discrimination for the most part will die within the next few decades.
@pratikashranjande78335 ай бұрын
@@arjyachatterjee6874Anti Kusongskar activists
@sourabhvyas70972 жыл бұрын
“The God Delusion”is really an amazing book .
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
It's fun but not very deep. And Dawkins doesn't really get philosophical positions.
@kap10692 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh lol im starting with it today
@Pinkparasite2 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh it was actually meant to be read by teens as said by Dawkins
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
@@Pinkparasite True. But why would someone assume teenagers won't understand philosophy?
@Pinkparasite2 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh perhaps to connect with a global audience which wants things in more simplified manner rather than intricate and deep.and he might have a bias that teens usually don't get the philosophical views !
@inderlanders68879 ай бұрын
Pretty substantial arguments. It was fun listening to them. Some counterpoints. Assuming that religion necssitates faith in a deity or a personal god, if deistic Hindus don't have a problem with atheism, then there is inherently no problem with using the descriptor "Hindu" for your own personal identity even if it means you suspend judgement vis-a-vis the existence of a personal god. Towards the end, you invoke the argument that sounds a lot like the argumentum ad populum, whereby truth is granted simply because the majority seeks it so. That is a bit defeatist imo because if we are concerned with labels, "Hindu" is indeed geographical. It comes directly from the river Indus and is in fact of non-Indian origin. Therefore, just because the majority claim that they are "superior" because of faith based claims (which BTW is something you did not fully delve into) and thus have a right to a label that is inherently geographical in origin is a bit superficial. PS. I do agree with you with the order of the new atheist books lol
@Ethics98213 ай бұрын
Jo hindu Upanishads hai usme guru aur shishya ke beech jo sawal jawab hua hai woh likha hai. Bad mai logo ko aasan language mai maz aaye iske liye story form banaya. log dharam follow kre issliye devo/god ki concept aaiye. Agar log adharam ke tare kese jiye tho accha nahi hoga.
@nkwisdom108 Жыл бұрын
First time watching your video. I have a few questions. Can you describe the word "Hindu" and its origins.? Who are the Hindus? What does it need to be a Hindu? And also how did you come to this conclusion that "Hindu atheist" is a privilege of the "Upper Caste"? Also, Can you distinguish between "Jaati", "Varna" and "Kul"? How are they different? Can you explain the words "caste" and "casteism"? Since when the word is in use and how did it come to be used in India and By whom? How it is different from the "Varna System" of Bharat? Finally, Who did the first "Caste Census" and their process of surveying, intentions, and outcomes?
@lovelle2634 ай бұрын
If u read basic hindu books then all these doubts wudnt even exist in u. Why not read ur own books with translation!!
@Ethics98213 ай бұрын
Vimoh answer this question ❓
@vimoh3 ай бұрын
Already answered in video.
@Ethics98213 ай бұрын
@@vimohhow can you say upper cast hindu ?
@Ethics98213 ай бұрын
@@vimohJo hindu Upanishads hai usme guru aur shishya ke beech jo sawal jawab hua hai woh likha hai. Bad mai logo ko aasan language mai maz aaye iske liye story form banaya. log dharam follow kre issliye devo/god ki concept aaiye. Agar log adharam ke tare kese jiye tho accha nahi hoga.
@piyushsonigara55508 ай бұрын
If we go by the dictionary definition of an atheist : "a person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods." Then apparently you can be a hindu and at the same time , Ex : if someone believes in the sankhya philosophy
@ssmssm30002 жыл бұрын
Not completed information provided in this video. Not well researched. Charwaka was not alone.
@kartya20002 жыл бұрын
Hello @vimoh Can you talk about when 'Hinduism' as a concept or religion came to be and since when did it began to be called Hinduism.. in terms of the historical time line.. Or if u already have a video talking about it, please link. Thanks😊
@himanshunagarwal1019 Жыл бұрын
Bro there is no exact time they are just assuming 😂😂
@sorenutpal6091 Жыл бұрын
Hindu word is farsi gali
@himanshunagarwal1019 Жыл бұрын
@@sorenutpal6091 hindu has come from Word Sindhu it has no relation with farsi
@NewTypeStarling5 ай бұрын
@@himanshunagarwal1019 true
@shamakuma19675 ай бұрын
Bhagwan bolenga tho wealth.wo nai tho kuch nahi.bina wealth kay kisko interest hai bhagwan may.
@mitahsildar12755 ай бұрын
How I became atheist: Joined some pseudoscience course without knowing. And while proving to others about unscientific practices in it , brought me to this conclusion.
@nimish865311 ай бұрын
Lol. Who told you Hinduism is not founded on basic premise that God exists? Firstly "Hinduism" is not a religion. It is a geographical term. The religion is Sanatan "translates to eternal" but let's use the term Hinduism because it is more commonly used. The Vedas and Upanishads clearly talk about God and so does the Gita. It's laughable to know there are people who believe Hinduism is not based on concept of God.
@vimoh11 ай бұрын
So let me get this straight. 1. Hinduism is not a religion but it is founded on the basic premise that god exists. 2. Hinduism is not the name of the religion and it's actually Sanatan but let's use the word Hinduism anyway. 3. This religion which is not a religion and is a geographical marker has sacred texts that tell about god. Kahaan se aaye ho bhai? Aur logic kii laash kahaan chhipayi hai?
@nimish865311 ай бұрын
@@vimoh Clearly you didn't read my response properly. I said "Hindu" is a geographic term and the religion is called "Sanatan" but let's use Hinduism for the sake of dialogue because most people use this term instead of the actual name of the religion. All the 4 Vedas and Upanishads are the core texts in Hinduism/Sanatan dharm and you can consider Bhagvad Gita as cliff notes of these texts as the the text itself says so. The Vedas and Upanishads have multiple references of "God". In fact, as per these texts, these are also given as knowledge by "God". I'll spare the details here to avoid a lengthy response but you can research yourself and you'll find this to be accurate. I don't know a single person who says I am a Hindu atheist. If there is someone who says they are "Hindu Atheist" clearly doesn't know what Hinduism/Sanatan dharm is. Of course there is no compulsion on anyone whether or not to follow any religion but someone calling themself Hindu and Atheist doesn't make any sense.
@spuriusscapula48292 ай бұрын
@@nimish8653 Please define "Hinduism" or "Sanatan" or whatever it is you want to call it.
@shinchan10000 Жыл бұрын
I am a former atheist and have now adopted Hinduism Was my decision good?
@scroll.withmohit6 ай бұрын
कूल
@shinchan100006 ай бұрын
@@scroll.withmohit after 9 months
@lovelle2634 ай бұрын
It is definitely good. Bcoz i was also atheist but now a sanatani. But I wud recommend you to read vedas , upnishad nd geets with translation
@Saiblo2 ай бұрын
Eeh bath. Muslims samne bath kar
@SamiSyed-br4uk6 ай бұрын
Exmuslim indian athiest here
@othmanempire56872 жыл бұрын
Fundamentally wrong assumption: "Hindu" is a religious denomination. The term "Hindu", in its most original form, just meant "Indian" in the Persian language.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
Then just say Indian. Why use a word that is widely understood to be a religious identity?
@othmanempire56872 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh because it is wrongly understood to be so. Just like how you'd say Jupiter was a Roman god. It means he is a god from the pantheon of gods followed in the religion that existed in Ancient Rome. Also, when you say Hindu it's not just the religious affiliation one refers to, there's a whole civilization and set of philosophies, most of which aren't related to religion but are definitely in the grey area. Most of the time when people use the term Hindu atheists, they are people who would want to disassociate the term with religion, wanting to get the original intent more mainstream acknowledgement.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
@@othmanempire5687 Again, all those philosophies don't have much in common. The only thing they have in common is that they came from this landmass. And a better descriptor for this landmass is India. Hindu means a religion. If you want to have a conversation about something, use commonly accepted words. Not meanings that existed thousands of years ago.
@othmanempire56872 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh again, if the whole point is about terminology, then I think I agree with you. But all I'm trying to do here is point out to you that probably the "Hindu Atheists" also mean what you mean, atleast in spirit. Also, something that is commonly accepted might not be factually right. Another way to look at it: there are people who participate in rituals purely for the culture and fascination, not necessarily because they have any religious obligation. Just as you said, broader Hindu culture allows you to question the concept of God and a lot of other things.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
@@othmanempire5687 The problem with using Hindu atheist the same way as Indian atheist is that people do it due to an attachment to their religion. And their religion is decidedly superstitious and irrational. Not to mention politically problematic in present times
@secondwaveprod2 жыл бұрын
Indian agnostic here. This video could have been half the length, just saying.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
This comment could have not existed. Just saying.
@secondwaveprod2 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh Exactly how I like the indian, rational, critical thinking youtube space to be; taking offence at criticism. Oh you will go far. Just saying.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
@@secondwaveprod Learn to take a joke.
@secondwaveprod2 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh Ah OK got it now 😂
@NewTypeStarling5 ай бұрын
@@secondwaveprod fr fr
@RavishKhare10 күн бұрын
The word Hindu actually means Indian. Hind was the name of geography given by Persians to their east. Thus the people of Hind were called Hindu. When British came there was no name existing for the varied practices, so they used the word Hindu for the people following the ibdian indigenous practices including Buddhism, Jainism, and tribal cultures. Richard Dawkins, perhaps the strongest living atheist in modern times, calls himself a cultural Christian. So getting bogged down by labels is another leftist religious stupidity which we must not fall for. What they call themselves is their personal matter. The question we must see is whether they become unscientific or not.
@ShoshyDeolLonewolf032 жыл бұрын
Sir, also can you put a video on toxic indian shows and their impact on Women and Girls
@VIKASHSINGH-hf3kt2 жыл бұрын
nice question
@manyamishra68832 жыл бұрын
Like which shows
@ShoshyDeolLonewolf032 жыл бұрын
@@manyamishra6883 like TV Serials of every indian language
@manyamishra68832 жыл бұрын
@@ShoshyDeolLonewolf03 Is that directly related to an atheism/philosophy/politics? Not so much really because then it will be more of a content review channel
@ShoshyDeolLonewolf032 жыл бұрын
@@manyamishra6883 no..... I was talking about a video I requested on TV Shows that promotes toxicity like Ideal women, Women misogyny etc.
@deepanjalirockx55062 жыл бұрын
I don't think ppl actually call themselves charvak, i think what ppl jst mean by hindu atheist is that because hinduism isn't hostile towards atheists (which is actually true) ppl r nt forced to choose a side, like ppl have to in abhramic religious , which i think is actually good, ppl don't follow god blindly bt also don't reject vedas or the teachings. Also y upper caste hindu family? Wat does this have to do casre
@thesage20805 ай бұрын
Say you are a milky-way atheist ❤❤❤
@Nikhil-fm2lq7 ай бұрын
You need to understand dharma is not religion. Sanatana dharma is a way of life and gives freedom to believe on god or even not
@spuriusscapula48292 ай бұрын
What does "way of life" mean?
@abhisheksainani3 ай бұрын
You can use the word "blasphemy" instead of calling it "major major major".🙂
@Ignitesoull4 ай бұрын
I am here after listening Anurag's podcast. That podcast gave me hope that people are discussing the udea of god with an great insight. Great effort to debunk Hindu Atheist.
@swagatamdey Жыл бұрын
I found your video really enlightening because I heard this appropriation and was confused about it.. How can I find literature on Charvaks? I want to know about it...
@chirichkilipaaripresents2 жыл бұрын
Why i am viewing cow raksha ads,,,, ,,,,,,,, Current trent is -- I am an atheist and i believe in spirituality 😂😂😂😂.... Jaggi with bike. jpg
@atifimtiyaznazeer2 ай бұрын
Why don't you write Ex Hindu , similar to ex Muslim
@zupergut301511 ай бұрын
I am am a hindu by civilization, but I don't know what i am, i can't say i am atheist when i look at the whole existence, the more further away i look into how wonderful and massive the life and the universe is the more i want to believe in god, but at the same time when i look at the suffering in the world i can't say i believe in the god, i am hanging in between looking for answers 😂 But this hanging in between isn't so bad, it keeps me me still,i prefer this in between life is thrilling:)
@gurnoorsingh221410 ай бұрын
But you are not in middle, you believe in god dont you?
@zupergut301510 ай бұрын
@@gurnoorsingh2214 wait are you saying not believe is middle then? XD as i see being in middle means trying to discover if it is or not. There is "Yes" there is "No" and then there is "I don't know". But i do hope there's one tho, otherwise, this who life thing seems meaningless,i don't want to be more nihilistic then i already feel like sometimes XD
@Vader44999 ай бұрын
@@zupergut3015So you’re an agnostic theist.
@NewTypeStarling5 ай бұрын
All living beings are part of the greater soul and the greater soul sometimes sends full manifestations of itself(Krishna) to restore balance. They come to restore balance.
@OjusChugh192 ай бұрын
I listen to everyone, I read everything but do what I feel is the best. Thanks to everyone for advising me though
@kushalmukhopadhayayuhi3314 Жыл бұрын
Why don't you mention Purva Mimangsa? It's the oldest vedic atheism in Indian tradition.
@shamakuma19675 ай бұрын
Hum ek hi bhagwan ya God may believe kartha hai aur wo God hai rupya,paisa,dollar,pound ithyaadi.Baaki sab Gods ka baap hai paisa,ya wealth.Arey bina paisey tho mandir ka bhagwan bhi tumko darshan nahi denga.Cinema ka ticket fir bhi milenga lekin bhagwan ka darshan nahi milenga.baaki sab rituals,customs,festivals,entertainment hai....wo tho har jagaha hai.Aajka temples aur Disney land may koi farak nahi raha.
@Jp-sp3eg2 жыл бұрын
I don't accept the authority of Vedas and thus I am an atheist . But not only Charvaka but Buddhism and Jainism also comes under same umbrella so a Buddhist or jain must be an atheist.
@ankitjain37602 жыл бұрын
I am a Jain but Jainism believe in Aatma and Moksh. Both these does not have any proof.
@hemishshah6666 Жыл бұрын
@@ankitjain3760 moksh - absolute nothingness. Soul is chetna or consiousness. Logically both of these exist. What doesn't exist is rebirth and karma theory of Jainism. I think karma and rebirth were invented to keep the morality intact, so that the law and order could be easily maintained and the masses could be controlled in a better efficient way. Jainism could have been a perfect atheistic hub if it had compromised it's theory on rebirth. Even karma could maybe somehow justified, but rebirth is something which will never be proved and doesn't exist either. I'll come to my point of how karma could exist in a practical form, I will give a very very basic example for that. You eat non veg, you behave more violently, because of the tamas gun of meat. Which leads you to behave in a violent way, often it could eventually lead you to troubles as it plays with your temper, and concentration. So if the tamas, rajas and satva gunas can be proven, it is easy to prove that non veg can lead to a bad destiny in future. Same way, if you steal, you might get caught someday, atleast there will be a fear of getting caught, or fear of getting robbed or fear that someone else might steal something from you. And hence that constant state of fear, could lead to concurrent problems. These can be logical justifications which can be given for karma. Karma was also evolved in order to create more empathy in human beings, so that they behave more empathetically towards everyone. As non violence (ahimsa) was one of main part of Jainism, karma might have been used to promote ahimsa. Karma might be a partially correct or partially incorrect theory, but it does help in maintaining social good and social harmony, if practiced thoroughly.
@hemishshah6666 Жыл бұрын
@@mr.hazamayukiterumiBuddha was agonistic atheist. He didn't accept existence of god, whereas Mahavira was pure atheist, who blatantly claimed non existence of a supreme God. But anywhich ways, if you claim to be a Buddhist, you need to accept agonistic atheism, that you don't know whether god exists or not, and it doesn't matter if he does or not.
@bharathdeva94072 жыл бұрын
i m a hindu n i hate to see ppl worship these fake gurus or holy man .we hindus only worship our gods not human beings who claims to be god .stop being a follower n be a independant thinkers .
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
Hindus have always worshipped gurus. So I'm not sure where your claim about only gods is coming from.
@bharathdeva94072 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh i m talking about fake gurus
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
@@bharathdeva9407 What's a real guru?
@berserk3222 жыл бұрын
@Satoshikasumi You're giving an example. What is the definition real guru? Why should he be worshipped
@saideepakbhoompally82162 жыл бұрын
Do you think an atheist should reject, criticize hindu religion, vedas, claims etc. As you said its not based on claim of existence of god. Or we should be both atheist and rationalist to do it.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
The charvaks were materialists. Materialism includes atheism. Atheism is just a rejection of god. But materialism is rejection of all spiritual claims.
@Dhruv-Kumar Жыл бұрын
@@vimoh tell me if someone who believes in devas and devis (higher beings but not gods) and not gods is an athiest or not. If not then people who believe on spirituality are also not athiests And if yes then even hindus who worship ram, krishna, brahma etc can say that they think of their gods not as gods but some higher beings and therefore they are athiests.
@katagiri_yuuichi_692 ай бұрын
@@Dhruv-Kumarwhat the f you mean by higher beings ??
@lalita4428 Жыл бұрын
Bharat me agar koi khudko Nastik bol de to log bhadak jate hai , aise baat karte hai jaise kisi gunhegar se deshdrohi se baat kar rahe ho, gyan pelne lagte hai. Aur ye Hindu aur Christian log jyada karte hai. Pata nahi aap kaha rehte ho India me 😂
@unstoppableub6 ай бұрын
I don't believe in God. Don't care what am I being called.
@nirwanaswamy23382 ай бұрын
Please Consult The Doctor 🏥💊 First Ok
@devesh78962 жыл бұрын
No one is religious by choice But a religious by chance. 😏
@fakesake19285 ай бұрын
Don't you sound like you are true Muslim or Hindu
@SandeshGautam2 жыл бұрын
I am an atheist (i don't believe in god and any religious book) But I celebrate hindu's festival.. Now tell me I m hindu or atheist.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
Atheist who celebrates Hindu festivals.
@lightyagami94862 жыл бұрын
So what I'm atheist who celebrate hindu Muslim Christmas festivals whenever I feels like
@berserk3222 жыл бұрын
lol most hindu celebrate christmas here in the uk doesn't mean they are christian hindu. Why are you mixing your religious identity with cultural identity. If you light firecrackers and not pray to Ram on diwali doesn't mean youre an hindu atheist. The burning crackers are a cultural event. Shia Muslims in india celebrate navroz because of their past in persia. Now navroz being a religious festival of parsi was also a cultural festival for people of persia back in the time.
@othmanempire56872 жыл бұрын
I'm a lower caste "Hindu", who has rejected the authorities of religious gurus and what not. I do not take the authority of the Vedas completely because I haven't read it all, yet I do not pray to any God or gods. Why do I not get the choice to call myself free of religion? The point you made has just too many assumptions.
@MeraBharatMahan728 күн бұрын
Read Baba saheb Ambedkar books. Simple
@avinashdesamangalam38052 жыл бұрын
Hit the nail on the head!! Waiting for you to hit the argument "Hindu is a way of life" for a six!!!
@vishwakumar28642 жыл бұрын
Oh that "way of life" card 😂. They keep throwing it as if other religions are not ways of life ! For that matter , even tapeworms' life is a way of life 😝.
@sumit92artist2 жыл бұрын
Wtf does 'way of life' even means? I mean anything can be a 'way of life'. Eating shit can be a way of life. How and why tf does it even matter?
@SrMway Жыл бұрын
What nail in the head! 😂 He said if you don't believe everything in the Vedas are lies you cannot call yourselves a charvak. That is the stupidest thing I've heard today, the day is still young though. No book is full of lies! Every book has something right in it especially if it's popular. This guy doesn't want to give credit to the tradition that accepts atheism. Also why is he so protective of the category of 'atheists' as if they're important. Atheists are some of the most useless people in the history of humanity. Most of the great scientists are straight up believers in God or believers in some kind of God. Nobody inteligent who has done something with their inteligence looks at the Universe an says, "I am 100% sure there's no inteligence involved in the design of the universe" Because that is plain stupid to make such a claim knowing the things we know about our universe. And no one will make such a claim except these guys who want grab attention by saying things that seem intellectual.
@lovelle2634 ай бұрын
@@sumit92artistno where in the religion it says that we must eat shit. And if ppl around u are doing that than it is a you problem.
@lovelle2634 ай бұрын
@@vishwakumar2864well is it not ? Do atheists not like the teachings and culture ? Just asking
@AnaesthesiaIndia4 ай бұрын
Even those are Ramte with another name.😂
@ahp-67853 ай бұрын
You sound reasonable but Your argument are based on highly flawed assumptions. You can be a hindu even if you deny to all the hindu scriptures. I remember myself have stating the Ram and Krishna are just mythological characters and they never existed. I have said it in front of at least 30 elderly village people of age>50, including my immediate family member too. We just had our discussion. All thirty people disagreed me except one. The best thing is all this happened 20 years ago. Nobody threatened me, nobody forced his thoughts on him. Nobody changed the way he used to treat me. In the another gathering, I questioned cast system in front of upper cast people with age>50 who are hardcore beleiver of cast system. Again nobody threatened me for anything. Yes, cast system exists in India but with education society is moving away from it. The cities has almost moved on and real significant changes are happening at the village level too. Nobody from my Village with age
@vimoh3 ай бұрын
I used to think that too. Until I started receiving messages from people who were ostracised by their famioies for not believing in their Hindu ways. Your privilege protects you. Do not assume everyone is as fortunate.
@ahp-67853 ай бұрын
@@vimoh if so, then we need raise awareness about true Hinduism. Hinduism is something that as you mentioned also respects Charwak as 'Rishi'. Honestly, I would not tread Hinduism for anything, thanks to the liberty it provides to not only follow your prefered way of worship but also to propose your own philosophy if you don't agree with any existing ones. And it provides an umbrella where people of all kinds can coexist following their own path of enlightenment and while respecting that of others, that too with the spirit of Vasudhaiv Kutumbkam. Ofcourse, my first identity is always Indian. But after that I am a proud Hindu.
@spuriusscapula48292 ай бұрын
@@ahp-6785 What does it mean to be a "Hindu"? Can you define it?
@GauravSingh-zf9xc5 ай бұрын
Bro how can you say hindu atheism is upper caste privilege when i am from BC community and idont belive in god, vedas and any religious book but still my family doesnt care and my many of my friends are open atheist who are from st and also Brahmin their family doesn't care. Then how can you say being hindu atheist is a upper class privilege
@sandipanbiswas24352 ай бұрын
I think i am cultural hindu
@BenNeedsATheme4aDream2 жыл бұрын
Hindu can never ever describe an Indian citizen, it can only be a religious descriptor. Constitution is the definer of a nation. It hasnt stated the same. So people who equate religion and citizenship, probably need a therapy session.
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
Or a civics lesson.
@jiraiyasensei9022 жыл бұрын
Firstly hinduism not a real name it is called sanatan dhrama means enternal course of actions, the theory of karma, the theory world is maya {world is pain and struggle of materialistic things}, theory of continuous cycle of birth, theory recreations, theory of leaving the cycle of birth {moksha} are origonated from south asia, in sanatan dhrama there are 33 gods and there different forms but if u follow one god then u only called religion like buddhism, hare krishna. That's why u never called hinduism a religion or cult like other abhramic religions. always believed for one god but in Hinduism there is one main things which itself not an god is called brahmaan. Abhramic religion are very different from. Dharamic religions
@BenNeedsATheme4aDream2 жыл бұрын
@@jiraiyasensei902 yea right. 1 out of 10 'real' people might agree with you on that. Hinduism is a religion in reality. Don't delude yourself otherwise. Every religion (even the abrahamic religions think and brand themselves as a 'way of life'. Please look up what the characteristics of cults are. Almost all religions fulfill them. And as a fun exercise the time you fill up a form, look for Sanatan Dharma :) Perception is reality. Edit: Way of life or School of thought.
@vivash80682 жыл бұрын
@@BenNeedsATheme4aDream Define religion, please .
@Dhruv-Kumar Жыл бұрын
@@BenNeedsATheme4aDream hinduism is more a culture. And any Indian with Indianness (someone who has Indian culture) will be called a Hindu.
@santoshkumar2992Ай бұрын
English bla bla bla
@thedarrrklllord2 жыл бұрын
Intersting take though i disagree with most of it ...
@Abhisekhdutta5 ай бұрын
Who am I?I don’t believe in god or scriptures but still want my marriage to be done as per hindu customs because it is beautiful.
@vivekchoudhary67274 ай бұрын
You are just a regular human being who likes something and wants to do it..
@spuriusscapula48292 ай бұрын
There might be atheists who like the Christian style of wedding too. Doesn't make them Christian.
@Abhisekhdutta2 ай бұрын
@@spuriusscapula4829 Does Christian marriages include words of Jesus?Hindu marriages have all the hindu rituals based on scriptures.
@spuriusscapula48292 ай бұрын
@@Abhisekhdutta It is done in a church of God with a presiding priest, so of course it is Christian.
@sandeepbobde17342 жыл бұрын
🤘☺️☺️👍
@yuval64462 жыл бұрын
Great video
@SivaShankar-fd6vb2 жыл бұрын
Do charvagas believe in enlightenment ?
@vimoh2 жыл бұрын
What is enlightenment?
@Raja-ff9ks2 жыл бұрын
@@vimoh you speak so well but you don't know enlightenment
@akshat_2100 Жыл бұрын
@@Raja-ff9ks context
@chethanburre60165 ай бұрын
What valid points can you question the aforementioned the famous English Atheists?
@RajeshPatel-fe8rn2 жыл бұрын
From where did the tha word India came into existence can you give details?
@RajeshPatel-fe8rn Жыл бұрын
@@Aryan-gc6ze so what did the Hindu called themselves
@akshat_2100 Жыл бұрын
@@RajeshPatel-fe8rn You can call Bharatiya Atheist, if you dont like "Indian" word.
@Siberian_Khatru. Жыл бұрын
If Hinduism accepts atheism it doesnt mean atheism comes under its realm,If there's no solid and one definition of Hinduism than its not even a concept or a philosophy or a religion or any idea at all perhaps I dont think those who were entirely atheists ever wanted to include themselves into Hinduism as well like charvakas, mimansa darshan followers ,grammarians etc People have later most probably classified them also under the same realm of Hinduism so that it becomes practically impossible to escape from Hinduism in any way at all Since you can either be religious or not in fact even agnostic people are being pushed to believe in god or Spirituality as the modern day spiritualists try really hard to persuade them "come let us be a part of this journey for the discovery of god and follow all these so called methods to experience Something mystical"
@indroneel50276 ай бұрын
Hindu Atheist are actually the "political Hindus"....like I am an extreme right wing "Hindu" but I don't remember when was the last time I visited a temple, I hope you get it.
@sxflow1234 ай бұрын
Hindu atheist means agnostic Because Hindu become atheist and believe divine energy create this universe this means he is agnostic
@stevesmith49013 ай бұрын
You actually did make a very good point. You convinced me to watch more of your videos.
@farhidahmed44733 ай бұрын
So is Hinduisim religion or just a culture?
@spuriusscapula48292 ай бұрын
Hindus need to be clear on what to define it as. As an ex-Hindu, I consider it a religion. There are enough temples and bhajans and "sacred" rituals and all that BS for me to consider it a religion.
@farhidahmed44732 ай бұрын
@@spuriusscapula4829 but the video above can be concluded as you can still be hindu and and not believe in God. And I have once heard this type of thing from a podcast too - that back in the there was hindu scholars something like that who said it's okay to not believe in the divine creator.
@spuriusscapula48292 ай бұрын
@@farhidahmed4473 The point is Hindus don't have a clear definition of what it even means to be a "Hindu". For a Muslim, it's believing in the word of Allah, via Muhammad of course (but even they have Shias and Sufis and Ahmaddiyas, etc). For a Christian it's believing in the word of God and his "son" Christ. But even they have orthodox, catholic, protestant, JW, pentecostals, etc. For Hinduism, it's even more vague. Much vaguer. And if it's that vague, then it's almost pointless to use the word "Hindu", unless you define it to some clear extent. Forget a "divine creator", do you think the average "Hindu" on the streets will agree if you say that Rama and Hanuman were just fictional characters and it is not rationally possible for nuclear bomb-like arrows, 10-headed demons and monkey men, especially ones who can fly and change size, to exist?
@desi_anarch2 жыл бұрын
The reason there are no charvakas is that Adi shankara got jittery that the charvakas or materialist hedonists were distracting people from vedas and thus threatening the hegemony of the Vedic people. He shut them down and they faded into oblivion.
@hiruzenmonofuke734410 ай бұрын
Adi shankaracharya has like no connection to charvaka, whatsoever except maybe some debates and discussions. Charvaka did not die because of him.
@Unknownbass182 ай бұрын
Bhai Aap Charvak ho......
@spuriusscapula48292 ай бұрын
Do you think atheists have only existed in India in the past?
@zenzo4815 Жыл бұрын
Hindu atheist have means like one who are culturally hindu but are atheist who don't believe in god and other form of hindu atheist are thous who as u said reffer to the regional (hindu) atheists Can you do a stream with kushal ( calls himself hindu atheist) just to know his perspective this could help in understanding about it Charvaka = atheist = reject god and spritual = indian atheist not hindu atheist Most of hindus dont even read vedas there by dont care if they follow vedas there by they hv no problem rejecting it but they do tell sm mantras, songs to please and respect themselves and their parents beliefs If they don't know vedas fully but they respect the culture and traditions which had been followed by our ancestors and doesn't want it to be fadded away that why the call themselves hindu atheist Your side of atheist perspective devrive most frm western Charvaka did refuse vedas god karma spirtual because they were meterialist and for some reason i don't think they are exactly atheist
@ShubhajitBhuit5 ай бұрын
App to 2 sal pehle mere baare mein vabbissyabani kar liya tha jabki mujhe pata hii nehi tha ki main asa sochunga😅 But my journey was started when i started to know about Swamiji ❤
@beluga9596 Жыл бұрын
Many lopsided arguments with rationales filled with gaps and holes in logic . Further on , your entire argument pertaining to the word Hindu and it's identity is wrong , so are your prerequisites for being a Hindu in the first place .
@HolyRamanRajya Жыл бұрын
If everyone in South Asia is Hindu, what is their caste? That gets those hindu atheists go through a BSOD.