Why I disagree with the Attorney General's opinion

[@johnritch1276]

Sir Gk Ganesh , Good job nice and educational video about the laws in our country . Salute you sir

[@mkthon3657]

Where are all the others law’s makers? Don’t they have any knowledges on this? or have no guts to clarify? Thank you Tuan Gk Ganesan for cleared this and make even the ordinary Rakyat well verse with. Thank you

[@louvelightscandles6852]

For ppl like me who have no knowledge whatsoever on these.... Such brilliant articulation.... Thank you sir... Malaysia needs more ppl like you.

[@GKganesan]

It is people like you who force our team members to go on working deep into the night, burning both ends of the candle, despite our exhaustion.

[@youreright]

TOUCHE! Thanks for making such a convoluted conundrum easier for us Laymen to understand, sir. Your arguments are always clear and coherent. Lol, "Can you hear the thunder?" - that's God saying, 'Aye' and giving you His support! Stay Safe, sir!

[@GKganesan]

Thank you.

[@stevenong6611]

AG Idrus Harun must dismiss immediately.

[@zubirsaid8491]

Thank you Sir, this info is important to me as a citizen of this country. Have a nice day to you and your family Sir.

[@ambecappmanikam3351]

The AG thought he could goreng2 the Law; he didn't count on Mr. GK correcting him!!! Hurrah for Mr. GK!!!👏👏👏Neat n clean explanation. Tqvm, Sir🙏🙏🙏

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Ma. Ambeca

[@fernteo]

Brilliant! Very comprehensible! Thank you so much Sir!

[@MrBlurpBlurp-hg3dj]

Thank you for making the constitution easier for us laymen to understand after all that tangle of vocabularies. Good job Mr. GK.

[@sukumaranyakamparam936]

Thanks Mr. GK, well explained. From Bukit beruntong.

[@GKganesan]

Hi! Thank you Mr Sukumaran

[@manugohil210]

Very well explained . Very true point made . Thank you sir

[@ganabatirau2684]

GK has explained within legal fraternity and has demonstrated high proffessionality ; sadly we hv PM, Cabinet or AG only interested to keep their power then abide with Constitution; surely this going to lead us to Constitutional Crisis

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Mr Ganabatirau

[@vangoven5637]

Tuan GK...pencerahan undang undang mantap Kalau babi yg di sembelih tu ikut hukum org yg sembilih tu halal...maka halal daging babi tu Satu hari nanti babi yg haram tu...di halal kan oleh pemerintah. Dalam Malaysia laris di pasar...siapa yg beli Allahwuallam🤫

[@jasonphang3596]

At this time in our history, we need more men like you!

[@GKganesan]

Thank you for your support Jason

[@samsuddinzolkapli3565]

Agreed..

[@ambecappmanikam3351]

Truly!!! A BIG THANK YOU to you, Mr. GK

[@oneworld2724]

An eye opening to appoint future AG and Speakers not base on politician connections but base on qualification and 'fire' to serve for nation and to protect the interest of its citizens. Critical positions should baggage free.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you

[@myfury9708]

Superb and excellent explaination on powers of the King during Emergency under Emergency Ordinance and Federal Constitution to call, proroque and dissolve Parliament. Thank you Sir.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you En. Mazlan Yahya, for your kind words.

[@parimalachatchewan8122]

The sound of thunder gave me a goosebump……its like a warning. Sir, thank you for info….🙏🏽

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Miss Parimala

[@sasveenjegauthran9095]

Superb sir, I'm trying to share widely in Twitter and other social media as well. Hope someone up there watch this and put up arguments. Thanks for giving us such a informative regarding the law of constitution and emergency ordinance.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Sasveen for your kind gesture.

[@kryadarshni5802]

Impressive narration! Worth every second of the 15.30 minutes. More than the contents I adore the presentation, admirable skill to learn. Thank you very much.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you for your kind words Miss Krya.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you

[@tso4565]

GK's arguments opposing what the Attorney General said is very professionally presented. His video has been circulated widely and has attracted very affirmative comments. Quite a few now see him as a potential Attorney General.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you. I have a peaceful life. I want to keep it that way. I want to retire!

[@gerardejohn605]

@@GKganesan hahahahaha words of wisdom

[@anuarbin]

@@GKganesan Too bad.

[@rebeccalavanie26]

Awesome! My new inspiration and hero. Thank you sir for your videos

[@joonhou91]

Well explained sir. Even non law practitioners and layman people can understand. Thank you for taking time and effort to enlighten us on this pressing matter. Thank You.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you

[@conscience2370]

Another excellent tutorial that even senior lawyers can learn a great deal from. Hope the AGC watches it. Thanks for sharing your knowledge, sir.

[@GKganesan]

Many thanks for your kind words.

[@birsingh568]

Absolutely right and agree! Well done GK! Earn great respect from the public, protecting the interest of public and not selfish politicians. 👍

[@tso4565]

Thank you GK for the very clear clarification of where the Law stands on who can summon Parliament to sit. Now that it is very clear it is DYMM who can do so, why has he not used his power to do so? All this dilly dallying is detrimental to the interest of the country.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you

[@MrStevepga]

Another wise words from GK. I (n cthope this views reaches the palace

[@obgprasa]

Wonderfully explained. AGs must be impartial and not be swayed by politicians.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you.

[@I.m.unclesoon]

Thank you very much for the amazing insights and depth on this topic. We truly appreciate it. I have a question though - from the current proceedings, it seems that the Speaker of the House is preventing the MP from exercising their constitutional right esp on the debate on the declaration of the emergency (and other matters). Is this right for the Speaker to do this? What legal recourse are there for the MPs (or even the people) to compel the Speaker to act in accordance with the Federal Constitution. I do hope I make sense. Thank you.

[@GKganesan]

Q-1: No. Q-2; File a motion to remove Speaker Q-3: Campaign to YDPA and ask him to do something.

[@eepohwah2388]

Well analyzed Mr GK, as said you should be our honourable advisor to his majesty our Agung.

[@GKganesan]

No thank you! His Majesty has many clever people advising him. I want to retire!

[@eepohwah2388]

@@GKganesan doubtful Mr GK. If his majesty have been advised professionally the entire situation wouldn't be what we are facing today.

[@drpuvan]

Not Malay la how to advice …. Pendatang can’t hold high positions in government

[@leo96119611]

Excellent, straightforward explantion.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Mr Leo

[@k.p.doraisamy1790]

Now that is why the PN government is staggering till after August 1st. How convenient.!!

[@karthigesukeecha8902]

Very well explained n presented. Now the 2 ex AGs Thomas n Appandi had come out in support of AG Idrus. What is the Contriductory of the Law now. Is it possible for GK to SUE the AG n challenge in Court?

[@GKganesan]

The final court is always the heart of the people.

[@AMYoges]

Tq sir for your explanation.

[@aaabbb1384]

Excellent analysis well explained. The AG is no match to this lawyer which goes to show the calibre of AG we have.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you

[@yuenhiapling8159]

This lawyer should be given a chance to be the AG of Malaysia!!!

[@GKganesan]

Don’t want la. I rather retire and have a quiet life.

[@jamilsanarul5303]

What a clear and beautiful explaination..!!👍👍👍

[@GKganesan]

Thank you

[@zamreedawood1714]

"nuclear option" .... i am smiling sir ... very comprehensive explanation. "thunder"

[@GKganesan]

Thank you En Zamree.

[@geetgovind5151]

Fantastic explanation sir. Plain and simple arguments.

[@rpremkumar1958]

The AG should be advising the Cabinet, who appear to relish their advisory capacity to the PM. One sibling sits as AG and the other as Speaker of the Legislation. In itself an unsavory arrangement. The AG's interpretation saves the PM's face, whilst forgetting that the Monarch has given him a prior 'as soon as possible' gesture, which is lost on the likes of the de facto Law Minister! Apparently a word to the wise doesn't ring a bell. In your sterling mind opening elucidation and interpretation, twice the thunder punctuated with resonance of reason 🙏. Thank You GK.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Mr Prem

[@rantaupanjang7879]

you can ask the de facto law to fly kite...useless minister from PAS..

[@malamsintan5552]

Informatif pointers

[@GKganesan]

Terima kasih

[@kirupanandanemurugesu6089]

In a true democracy, the Executive, Legislature and Judiciary must be able to check and balance against each other.

[@GKganesan]

Excellent point, Mr Kiru. You have a deep understanding of the Rule of Law!

[@kirupanandanemurugesu6089]

@@GKganesan Unfortunately, our Legislature and Judiciary had their powers clipped by the Executive since the eighties. In true democracies like US & India, the Judiciary & Legislature can easily challenge & reverse unfair executive actions.

[@DGoldy303]

You know what sir, you should become our AG!

[@GKganesan]

Thank you but no thank you!

[@DGoldy303]

@@GKganesan 😂😂😂

[@sammykupper]

Well researched and lucidly explained. Hope our beloved King will exercise his power acordingly. It will be good if this video reaches him. Bravo GK 👌🏻👍🏻👏🏻🙏🏻

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Mr Hari

[@jamestan8266]

Sir, you are good. The country must have you to guide the nation.

[@GKganesan]

Small thing la James. Other people are doing so much more for the country.

[@george4942]

Sir, is it true that during an Emergency the saman/ for defaulting SOP'S one cannot argue in court...? Though with discounts..7/14day..rates..

[@GKganesan]

I am not sure. Although I do not think that can be true…?

[@johananputhucheary7628]

Thank you GK. Absolutely clear explanation

[@GKganesan]

Thank you

[@msloh5125]

Sir, when a PM admitted that he does not mind ppl call him a moron and he is confused over the use of his own name on legal documents and matters, we as Rakyat have totally lost confidence in him and his enormous size cabinet. We need a knowledgeable law maker like you to enlighten the Rakyat. Hopefully your clear explanation reaches the DYMM Agong, Daulat Tuanku!

[@GKganesan]

Thank you, Ms Loh!

[@rocketraja8088]

Appropriate and Timely GK sir. This reveals the incompetentcy Of those talking otherwise. But then,they will get away with The Authorities under their sleeve.

[@ambecappmanikam3351]

Looks like the AG didn't really qualify his Bar Exam..he doesn't even know his law books..🤣🤣🤣kopi-o degree!!

[@HantuSuper]

The higher law will prevail against the lower law. Whatever our Malaysia Constitution say is superior if there is a contradiction between it.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you. True.

[@jrjunior653]

Tqvm sir, always waiting your video

[@spain4everfever]

Thank you Sir for the wonderful explanation. Just a thought, would the application of Art 150(6) in this case further strengthen the proposition that the provisions of the Ordinance prevails over the Constitution? 🤔

[@GKganesan]

Clever! Yes!

[@topdeot]

The more we witness the political shenanigans in Malaysia, the more I'm convinced that our Law and Constitution did little to protect the Rakyat for our system may on paper looks like there's a division of power between the 3 branches of government however in reality all 3 branches are in cohort with each other just so each can maintain their position and power. Fellow Malaysian can't even criticize the government without running the risk of Section 233 or Sedition Act 1948.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you En. Rahman. You shouldn’t be afraid of these sections as long as your criticism is courteous and correct.

[@topdeot]

@@GKganesan Language is very subjective and is opened to interpretation. What may sounds courteous and correct for Ali may sounds offensive and wrong for Ahmad. Thus the the American’s founding fathers foresaw this and created the First Amendment - Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or of the right if the people peacefully to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. This is the only country I know of where the supreme law is to limit the creation of law when it comes to matter of free speech.

[@rajendrankandiah231]

The Ruling Government at any one time needs "absolute law advise" so nobody can dispute, facts and figures dont lie. ( just imagine "asap" the present law minister cannot define ). Who has messed the law, the ruling party or the law itself.

[@shae10100]

Superbly explained sir.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Dev

[@anuarbin]

Wow, really clears a lot of thing. Why no reporter want to interview this guy on this matter? I really want to translate this to BM, but not enough language skill.

[@GKganesan]

Being done.

[@anuarbin]

@@GKganesan thank you. I noticed you make Malay content after commenting.

[@qwertyaplee3267]

True, simple English, layman like me also can understand, how come AG interpret differently...

[@GKganesan]

Thank you!

[@ladingu]

If YDPA disagrees with AG’s advice, he should directly ask for the advise from the Fed Court under Art 130 to resolve these issues.

[@GKganesan]

Look at Art. 150(8) please

[@mohdfirdausabdullah7974]

fantastic explaination sir.

[@amarauzirul7152]

Thank you sir for the sound explanation!

[@GKganesan]

Thank you En. Amar

[@yeekangguan559]

Thank you sir for enlighten us with your interpretations the difference power between act 14 and 17 and act 40 and 55 of the EO.ord. You are the most learned lawyer who dare to speak you mind without fear or favour. Malaysian need more learned and knowlegdeable solicitor to speak up for the well being of the rakyat. Hat off to you SIR.

[@GKganesan]

Small thing la.

[@namtatcher3992]

I totally agree with you that the King has the right under an emergency to oder the re commencement of the Parliament to make amendments to the sections in Emergency Ordinance and Federal Laws in conflicts with the Contitutions. However, the most important is for the Parliament to discuss the current utmost urgent issues in the country related to the pandemics.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you

[@mohdkhainis6992]

Thank you Mr GK

[@GKganesan]

You are welcome En M. Khamis

[@muniandy6052]

At first the emergency declared should not be legalized. Pm wrongly advised the king.King also should meet all the political leaders of all parties before he endorsed.

[@GKganesan]

Absolutely.

[@sksamy136]

Well explained dear G k.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Mr SK Samy!

[@kentssl8709]

We need to appoint you as our Law Minister in the next cabinet without a doubt

[@GKganesan]

No need la Mr. Kent. There are so many better candidates out there. And I want to retire anyway!

[@aalaal5364]

Totally Agree.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you

[@premkumar-ny3le]

Fantastic explanation Mr GK.. salute 🤙

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Mr Prem

[@othmanismail1551]

Amat baik penjelasannya...

[@GKganesan]

Terima kasih

[@christophersolomon7042]

Cheers Sir. A good law clerk.

[@pangkiatloh4555]

It is like the 1MDB case when then the AG Afandi made decision on it.

[@tayget_tv]

Eye opener and informative sir.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Mr Vicknesh

[@clewe1178]

Dear GKtv Law, I do like to comment on some points. 1)Once a PM loses majority support in the Parliament either through a vote of no confidence or failure to get support for his Bill he is technically dismissed from his post. So he has to report to the King on the situation and to request for His Majesty to dissolve the Parliament and to call for an election. Since he is being technically dismissed as the PM, His Majesty does not has to take his advice but make his own decision, either to dissolve the Parliament and call for election or appoint another MP who he feels has the majority support in the Parliament as the new PM. 2)Once an Emergency is imposed the Parliament is suspended. So how to call for a Parliament sitting when the Parliament functions are suspended? The main purpose of an Emergency is to suspend the Parliamentary functions so that the Executive Branch of the Government, the PM and his Cabinet have more executive powers to tackle and solve the crisis, the COVID-19 without having to seek the Parliament approval. 3)Our Constitution is always supreme and no one is above it. During an Emergency its Ordinance is still subject to the ruling of our Constitution. The Court as the Judiciary Branch is the Guardian and interpreter of our Constitution. Has anyone, especially the politicians taken the case to the Court? A recent case in UK in August, 2020 the British PM, Mr. Boris Johnson advised the UK Queen to declare Emergency in order his Government could have more time and executive powers to negotiate on Brexit without having to go through the UK Parliament. And the Queen signed for the Emergency Declaration through the advice of her PM. The Opposition went to the Court and successfully have it declared as null and void to the embarassment of the UK AG. So the UK Parliament had to convene its sessions. 4)The AG can amend any section of the Emergency Ordinance which is in conflict with our Constitution. 5)I do understand that a Parliament term is for 5 years unless it can dissolved earlier by the King either through the advice of his PM or his own discretion if his PM has been technically dismissed or resigned on his own accord. For the Parliament and the Government (the Executive Branch to be legitimate the Parliament must have a sitting every 6 months. I am not sure whether our Constitution has this condition. If it does have then this Emergency can last for only 6 months instead of 8 months as being approved. So our PM has to seek audience with His Majesty for extension before the 6-months expiry and let the Parliament calls for sitting upon 6-months expiry. On the time of sitting the PM can inform the Parliament has been extended and so the Parliament is suspended. So it is up to the Opposition to take the case the Court for decision. This is my understanding from my reading of Parliamentary system of Government, especially on The British Constitution. Regards, Ewe

[@GKganesan]

Thank you for taking the trouble to write. Your understanding is generally correct. However, may I suggest you download the Emergency (Essential Powers) Ordinance 2021 and look at various sections m, e.g. from 11-18. Next please download the Malaysian Federal Constitution and look carefully at Art 150 in general. Then look at Articles 150(2B), 150(3), and 150(8). Having done that please write back with your views.

[@clewe1178]

@@GKganesan Thank you for giving a lead to our Malaysian Constitution. I do feel that the sections, 14 & 17 which allow the sittings of the Parliament to be called, are redundant as the declaration of Emergency is to suspend the Parliament.

[@clewe1178]

My understanding on Parliamentary System of Government are as follows: 1.The PM rules under the name of the constitutional monarch or president. 2.The constitutional monarch or president reigns but not rules. 3.The constitutional monarch or president must act on the advice of the PM and not any other person such as the caretaker PM or technically dismissed PM (the one who has lost the majority support in the Parliament). Once the PM losses the majority support in the Parliament he is technically dismissed from his appointment and he becomes a caretaker PM. When the Parliament is dissolved the ruling PM remains as a caretaker PM until his reappointment or the appointment of another MP as PM after the election result. 4.The PM and his cabinet, his government and the Opposition are known as the constitutional monarch or president’s. So in Malaysia case they are called His Majesty PM and Cabinet, His Majesty Government and His Majesty Opposition. This is one advantage of the Parliamentary System where the overall head, the constitutional monarch or president is neutral. 5.Any Act, Ordinance, Proclamation of Emergency and Board is deemed to be void if it violates the Constitution as each of them can only be created in accordance the terms of the respective Article which allows its creation. The Court can nullify any of these if it violates the Constitution. 6.The Proclamation of Emergency and its guiding Ordinance overwrite all written laws, the Constitution during its term or period of emergency. They cannot be challenged in Court, except if they are in conflict with the Constitution. 7.The Constitution can only amended by a 2/3 majority of the attending MPs’ votes in the lower be house or through referendum. Any Bill would become law or Act without amendment if it manages to secure 2/3 majority of the attending MPs’ votes or it would have to undergone various stages of sub-committees readings or sittings to amend in order to get common consensual to pass to the Parliament for approval as an Act or law. 8.Any country that adopts the Parliamentary system have conditions or Articles in its Constitution to confirm the above 7 points. The only difference is in having non-elected or nominated MPs such in Thailand and Sabah. Other difference might be the PM needs not be a MP at time of appointment and needs to be within 3 - 6 months like in Australia and Canada. So based on the above points the following conclusions are arrived: 1.A constitutional monarch or president can only decide when there is no PM with authority, for appointment of PM and dissolution of Parliament. He has to appoint a person who he feels has the majority support in Parliament through the evidence shown to him without delay. This is to prevent the country from going on without a government as he cannot rule, but reigns only. So it is the appointed PM who would form his Cabinet (or his team) for His Majesty or Excellency to confirm. All governing matters of the country the monarch or president only acts on the advice of his PM. 2.The current Emergency has breached the 6 month period from last sitting of the Parliament, 17/12/2020. The Emergency should have expired on 16/06/2021. Since there is no contest in the Court so it is deemed to be accepted by all parties. 3. Once an Emergency is declared the Parliament is suspended and cannot be dissolved. This is why there can be no sitting for the questioning and voting on any matters, including Emergency. The only course of action is through Court. As there is no dissolution the Parliament must have its minimum requirement, I.e. to have at least a sitting in every 6 month period.

[@GKganesan]

This is an excellent understanding. Since you go this far, which further than most, might I suggest some additional points? We need to go a little deeper. We need to ask questions based on the principle of rule of law. Are ouster clauses legally right? Can they be challenged? If so what tools are there? Was there an abuse of the Federal Constitution for illicit objectives? What csn be done about it? Does a citizen lose any right to question his government after he casts his votes? How can politicians be compelled to run the country according to established protocols of democracy - and one which brings about a happy, just, prosperous nation where all are equals? Ask these and other related questions.

[@clewe1178]

The AG is correct that the King can summon Parliament only through the advice of his PM. And this is confirmed recently by the King himself when he spoke out publicly for the Parliament to be held. A PM who has lost the confidence of the Parliament is technically being dismissed and has no right to advise the King except to report to him on the situation. Then it is the King discretion to appoint another MP who can command the majority support or to dissolve the Parliament. The dismissed PM can also seek for reappointment if he can show he still has majority support through agreement with third party. Once the Parliament is dissolved the PM status becomes that of a caretaker for Administration only. The AG is wrong in giving consultative advice for the Emergency to exceed the 6 months from the last sitting on 17.12.2020. I wonder whether the current Parliament is still valid since it breaches the 6-months period ruling. We have to wait to see when the Parliament reconvenes on 27.07.2021. An Emergency Ordinance is hastely prepared due to urgency for the running of the country during Emergency. Any term or section of the Emergency Ordinance and its proclamation which are in conflict with the Constitution is deemed to be void. The Emergency Ordinance is supreme over other written laws, but not the Consitution. So it can be challenged in Court unless it is against the Constitution. The AG is correct that the King can summon Parliament only through the advice of his PM. And this is confirmed recently by the King himself when he spoke out publicly for the Parliament to be held. A PM who has lost the confidence of the Parliament is technically being dismissed and has no right to advise the King except to report to him on the situation. Then it is the King discretion to appoint another MP who can command the majority support or to dissolve the Parliament. The dismissed PM can also seek for reappointment if he can show he still has majority support through agreement with third party. Once the Parliament is dissolved the PM status becomes that of a caretaker for Administration only. The AG is correct that the King can summon Parliament only through the advice of his PM. And this is confirmed recently by the King himself when he spoke out publicly for the Parliament to be held. A PM who has lost the confidence of the Parliament is technically being dismissed and has no right to advise the King except to report to him on the situation. Then it is the King discretion to appoint another MP who can command the majority support or to dissolve the Parliament. The dismissed PM can also seek for reappointment if he can show he still has majority support through agreement with third party. Once the Parliament is dissolved the PM status becomes that of a caretaker for Administration only.

[@tulisimani7100]

Well said sir

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Thulasi

[@chuanyewlee9502]

Superb

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Mr. Chuan

[@mkanwar21]

you had me at Article 4... BOOM!

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Anwar

[@firozabdulhamid3144]

Well done 👍 in your element

[@GKganesan]

Terima kasih banyak banyak.

[@collinlee9806]

Keep it up. I love the last statement .. GK .

[@GKganesan]

Thank you, Mr Lee

[@nurabdullah8110]

PN Muhideen is smart for keeping the Parliment Locked. There is no way for changes and he can BUY time....all these at the mercy of the Rakyat. PM survival mentality.😁😂

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Cik Nur Abdullah

[@anitafazzhouse1560]

Thank you Sir

[@GKganesan]

Welcome

[@joeljeshurun1918]

Amazing sir. 🙏

[@GKganesan]

Thank you, Joel

[@benong705]

the honourable tuan speaker & the honourable ag adik beradik tak conflict of interest ke?

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Ben Ong for this view

[@manimaranpalaniappen6940]

Very well explained, Mr GK. As a lay person, I am of the opinion that the law is being manipulated, if not misinterpreted. So sad.

[@GKganesan]

I agree. Thank you Mr Manimaran.

[@alexanderraj1534]

Was waiting for you video! Thank you Sir🙏

[@GKganesan]

Sorry. Took awhile.

[@brianjs4494]

Clear, sound and well reasoned, as usual.

[@GKganesan]

Thanks Brian

[@brianjs4494]

@@GKganesan You're welcome!

[@mhdamranmhd2718]

Bukan Sivaji Ganeson ?

[@christopherloh936]

He shld be the next AG

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Mr Loh. I am happy where I am. I desire to retire and travel. Not do more work!

[@notwen9779]

Well said!

[@sallehuddinahmad7264]

Its appears to be WAYANG!!

[@GKganesan]

Terima kasih En. Sallehuddin

[@sallehuddinahmad7264]

@@GKganesan you are most welcome

[@jrjunior653]

Your talking with tunder, God bless you..

[@forreal3634]

🤣🤣🤣.. Thunder means God?? Why la you people and your God nonsense like to butt in everything

[@jrjunior653]

@@forreal3634 of course tunder not was God, simple talking and hold day,your life your family is mean God blesses you.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you JR

[@jrjunior653]

@@GKganesan our welcome sir.

[@Ramsworldwidevolg]

If the malaysian constitution is a mess, I reckon it should be rewritten but in a democratic idealogy way and any thing got to do with racism, should be discarded. ie. no one sided prefernce to any particular race and religion!! Everything should be based on merit and not based on reservations.

[@fluffyravin371]

Sir.., I am truly glad to hear your vital law & order about parliament ordinance . Many were unaware of this info ...many thanks again X -xerox mgr

[@michaelsteinhemingway727]

Hopefully very, very important people are watching your videos sir.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you Mr Michael. I hope so too!

[@michaelsteinhemingway727]

@@GKganesan Happily our representatives urge our esteemed friend to get cracking before we see more flags hanging outside distressers. You sir are well dressed and speak convincingly. May the Power of this Land seek your sage counsel, in person before sundown.

[@Mamamiaalt]

Thank you for the video. It looks like your are going in a circle Sir. Firstly, the issue is who has the absolute right to call the parliament to convene. After a long explanation, towards the end you said that the even the court cannot question the emergency ordinance. Then you are suggesting the only place that can determine the validity of the ordinance is the parliament. Now this is my point. The parliament will not convene unless either the PM or the King agrees for it to convene. To determine who has the final say, the parliament has to convene. Now, aren't you going in a circle? I stand to be corrected.

[@GKganesan]

Well if that is how you feel. All the doors are closed. The law that says all this is in my opinion, unconstitutional. The door to Parliament we are told by some lawyers lies in the hand of the Cabinet. If the Cabinet in our country behaves like the cabinets of developed nations, it would pay homage to and respect the law. All these problems have arisen because our Cabinet is not responsible enough. They do what they like. And the people think they can’t do anything legally until the next election. That is what politicians want us to think. We can use lawful means to raise objections and protest peacefully in the social media by using courteous language. I think the rakyat should let the Cabinet know that they won’t be fooled into silence.

[@jefftan2859]

Looks like the AG was incompetent! Or, deliberate lying to the King?

[@NashTheGreat]

11:02 WHAT A MAJESTIC TIMING HAHAHAHHA

[@GKganesan]

Thank you

[@abdulhamidmanaf8155]

A ship with two captains.

[@GKganesan]

Thank you. Excellent point

[@TheTgIpohMan]

I am waiting for the AG to explain his stand in this matter, come on AG... where are you?

[@ambecappmanikam3351]

AG ran away to hide under his bed!!!🤣🤣🤣

[@metaphosV]

No Parliament to summon the AG for explanation. LOL

[@hadzrayarchitecture]

GK you are doing god's work on these educational videos!

[@GKganesan]

Thanks

[@philipfong8079]

AG, is that justice or just a political tool? These are the things thay made me hate bolehland.

[@manggiskuning]

GK, I have a question that I would like your opinion on for academic purposes. Given that the role of the AG Malaysia represents both the YDPA and the federal government, which party would be represented by AG if there is a court case between the two institutions?

[@GKganesan]

Excellent. They'd get a private lawyer for the one side. This is one of the contradictions of the Constitutions which has not been put right!

[@manggiskuning]

@@GKganesan Thank you