How screwed would we be if Kodak stopped making film?
@jasonphilbrook43329 ай бұрын
I do B&W film photography. I like tmax400 but could adapt to other manufacturers products when my hoard runs out.
@Flburr999 ай бұрын
Color film would be decimated for all intents and purposes. Black and white would gain a boost in sales though.
@driftfits9 ай бұрын
If kodak dropped, i think other makers would try and crowdfund the saving of the stocks. I’m not a huge color neg fan, but do love me some ektar 100 and lomo color ‘92 Otherwise ill stick with my delta 3200, lady grey, and berlin 400
@fraserembrey56769 ай бұрын
I don't see them suddenly deciding to stop altogether. There is clearly demand enough for it and they will surely continue to make cinema film for a good while longer. If they suddenly go bankrupt then I'd hope that their film business would be bought and continue going.
@Millicente4 ай бұрын
@@Flburr99 I think B&W would die with it in due time. Loss of all that color stock would lead to less shooters, less cameras sold, and less people coming into the hobby as more people leave. Eventually the cost of business won't be worth the sales.
@londonskaterboi9 ай бұрын
Fujifilm recently started the production of new colour film in Japan
@lucasthedukus9 ай бұрын
Yeah ive heard that thru a friend in Japan. Supposedly they’re starting to ramp up some film production the last couple weeks and stuff is showing back up on the shelves over there!
@metalfingersfilm9 ай бұрын
IS there more info on this you can link me?
@guccimain899 ай бұрын
@@metalfingersfilmthere’s some anecdotal evidence on reddit that’s pretty convincing. English speaking posters in Japan have gone to shops and monitored over time (with pics). Fujifilm stocks with new expiration dates have been hitting shelves more frequently in what seems to be batches.
@@metalfingersfilm Yvonne Hanson uploaded a video a couple days ago titled "Fujifilm Back in Production! What is Film Photography Like in Japan in 2024?". Yes, Fujifilm seems to be back!
@PokhrajRoy.9 ай бұрын
Growing up, photography studios and camera catalogues used to be a thing. The culture and curiosity are as important as ‘demand’.
@jasonphilbrook43329 ай бұрын
The biggest practical obstacle to color film photography is that 95% of scanning sucks. Color scanning is about 4x harder than B&W scanning. If there were a way to use digital references to calibrate a scan super easliy, maybe some AI can take care of that skillfully someday, we can adapt to more unusual color films. Yes, Kodak's offerings are nearly untouchable excellence sometimes, they are not neutral color balance either.
@Ldsm119 ай бұрын
I think scanning with a dslr at home with software like negative lab pro, Produces excellent results, especially when compared to Noritsu or Frontier scanning machines. And scanning at home allows for more adjustment
@JimIBobIJones2 ай бұрын
The whole point of shooting with an anachronistic medium is the more involved process. It makes no sense to me to go with film in the first place if you want automation. Its not like the results aren't very easily replicable or is anything unique to the format. Ideally we should all be enlarging our own negatives. If you want digital images as your end product and all you want out of film is the granularity controls of old cameras, get a DSLR/Mirrorless, turn everything to manual and turnoff autofocus. If its the "look" you are after, download or build yourself a decent profile in lightroom. What is film without the process? Not much. That said, there are already some really good software for automating scans. Silverfast is excellent IMHO.
@filmstockreel9 ай бұрын
I see where you’re coming from but I feel like the points you’re making are ones we’ve been living with for years. If anything things are better now than they were 2-3 years ago. There is more reason to be optimistic than there is to be worried based on even the reasons you give in this video. Thanks for continuing to make these appreciate the point of view.
@MarksPhoto9 ай бұрын
There's a better chance of Kodachrome coming back than Aerochrome. Film shooters are fortunate that Kodak invested in an entirely new line (building) in the early 90s, with all the modern technology back then. Imagine if they were still running equipment from the mid 20th Century, held together with baler twine and duct tape.
@MarksPhoto9 ай бұрын
@@thevoiceman6192 That's aerocolor - a color negative film for aerial uses. Aerochrome was an infrared sensitive color reversal film that turned live foliage a funky pink. Used in Vietnam to find places where to unload B52s (among other peaceful uses). US Gubmint has all sorts of digital assets for infrared, so no need for film anymore.
@petesime9 ай бұрын
I'm all about black and white myself. Although I have dabbled with making trichromes.
@MarcoRoepers9 ай бұрын
I am also very good in worrying but it does not make the situation any better. The only thing that does help is to live in the moment and enjoy shooting film
@gavinjenkins8999 ай бұрын
If Kodak goes out of business in film forever, that same obligation to shareholders would require selling the patents required.
@Flburr999 ай бұрын
All valid points. The other side of the coin is aging film camera equipment. We’ll see 2 new film cameras this year but the half frame is pretty much a novelty. The new Rollei with LiDAR seems like a serious effort though. Other than that there’s not a camera company that seems to be interested in film. Even if they just made a new run of their last most popular camera bodies with no changes, it would really boost the market.
@bartoszpajak22859 ай бұрын
There’s something else that worries me. The cameras we’re using are at best 20 years old. I don’t want to know how many thousands of them die and go forever every single day.
@CalumetVideo9 ай бұрын
This is the issue as well, we need new full frame 35mm cameras of good quality, something like the Nikon FM. We also need a good 645 or 6x6 medium format film camera maybe like the Pentax 645, Bronica SQ or Fuji Rangefinders. Offer lenses in 35, 50mm, 105mm and 150mm and that’s plenty enough for most photographers. These old cameras and lenses are dying fast. I had a Mamiya RB67 65mm lens fail last fall. There are also issues with electronic cameras of the 1980’s and 1990’s, these electronically controlled shutters are failing. Compound that with the problem of few repair techs and backlogs and waiting times for the techs that can do the work. While it is more expensive, I only buy and use fully mechanical cameras like the Leica M3, Hasselblad 500 C/M and Nikon F2, they can fail but a good one is more serviceable than a older electronic one. I have a minty Nikon F3, it has an electronic shutter, but who knows how much longer it’s going to last.
@sharkpyro939 ай бұрын
im shooting with minolta srt series and got few spare bodies to be used as donors in case something fails, very unlikely anyway because they are built like tanks and are 100% mechanical, but yes we do need some manufacturers to release a modern film camera
@PokhrajRoy.9 ай бұрын
I was just thinking about dabbling in film photography.
@Overexposed19 ай бұрын
You should! Jump on in!
@CalumetVideo9 ай бұрын
Don’t just dabble! Jump in and immerse yourself in film photography!
@artistjoh9 ай бұрын
Film cannot survive just on old cameras. It needs new cameras. That is why the new Lomomatic 110 is important. But we need new 135 and 120 cameras. New cameras will goose film sales.
@CalumetVideo9 ай бұрын
Yes a nice 645 or 6x6 medium format film camera would would be amazing. A full frame good quality 35mm film camera would also help, something of the quality of a Nikon FM or Pentax K1000 at affordable prices.
@driftfits9 ай бұрын
I’d like to start by thanking you for a nice, digestible, and informative video. I don’t foresee Kodak backing out anytime in the foreseeable future. Pharma is a big money maker, high initial cost for them, but the rewards are huge. I’ll see if i can spot a rep at the next few trade shows i have to go to. Regardless, with Mint and Pentax stepping back into the film ring, i think we will see a huge moment that can either really help bring film back and make it cheaper, or send it back on a spiral.
@phuchong75689 ай бұрын
This video has been a real eye opener!
@slicebreakz9 ай бұрын
To add to Fuji point another rumor that started is that Fuji sold there film naming rights to Kodak and Kodak just manufactures Kodak film and puts a Fuji name on it. So yea if Kodak stopped we’d be very screwed
@SomeUnremarkableGuy9 ай бұрын
I`d say we need to try to support adox and harman in this. sure they are not perfect, but this is a huge thing for us and they can be improved. I don`t think Kodak will stop producing film as long as there is film demand in hollywood. I have question, why there are no respooled fujifilm like there is from kodak like their vision film?
@MarksPhoto9 ай бұрын
Fuji quit the cine film market about a decade ago. Every now and then, someone finds a stash and respools it. Atlanta Film Co. had some. They may be out. But still, its expired film now.
@thatfellarosto9 ай бұрын
Fuji has actually restarted production on a lot of their film stocks recently. Now its currently in a small scale but they plan to get back into mass production hopefully
@ToyStoryNBarneyFan9 ай бұрын
I feel the need to say this, while shooting still on Kodak Vision 3 is cool, it seems like now with a lot of companies selling it with or without remjet, the novelty of shooting on movie film is wearing off. I think we need more options for both consumer grade film and professional grade film
@johnwallace90028 ай бұрын
Don't forget Agfa color and Agfachrome I used to use it and Kodachrome.
@alexhaselden46239 ай бұрын
I’m mainly a black and white shooter so I haven’t been affected as much by Fuji giving up. Acros was nice but not my favorite. Ilford and Foma are still going strong, and there’s also Adox and Ferrania. So the black and white landscape doesn’t look too bad. The last big heartbreak I remember was Plus-X getting the axe and that was a long time ago.
@teleaddict239 ай бұрын
I don’t think we will ever see another company again making film as good as Kodak. In this digital age, we are very lucky that Kodak is even still going through the difficult process of making film when most people are shooting away on their phones. If film prices continue to rise, then demand for film will slow down. With Fuji releasing cameras like the recent X100VI that does a good job of replicating the look of film, a lot of people will be thinking is film worth it anymore? But I will plow on flying the flag for film for now, but I am one more price rise away from quitting and that Fuji is tempting me more and more.
@justaboringjoha36789 ай бұрын
3:20 I always thought there were three, Kodak, Fuji and Agfa, but i can't tell how strong Agfa was globaly, just talking about Europe, they seemed to be very popular.
@venteach.62899 ай бұрын
I heard recently that Fujifilm has started manufacturing again although it is only being sold in japan.. at least for now hopefully
@АндрейЛычев-щ3у9 ай бұрын
The end of the film era is now underway. agony. photographic film in the consumer market has become a fetish, instead of a household need. The industrial production of photographic film is now supported solely by orders from the military and the film industry. but both are in the process of switching to digital, and when that happens, consumer photographic film will die completely, with these 100,500 new producers of photographic film from the garage. The good old cameras are breaking down, there is nothing new. garbage, children's toys with one exposure, which are now being produced under the Kadaka and lomografiya brands, these are not cameras, but children's plastic rattles.
@CalumetVideo9 ай бұрын
Agreed! I do think Kodak is exiting film production, they saw it as a hype or throwback and a fetish. Old film cameras are bling for the young crowd, that crowd is now moving to old digital pocket cams, they didn’t stick around when prices of film rose, because they were not die hard film photographers, just making snapshots of the local gas stations and mailboxes. I still shoot black and white in my Leica M3 and Hasselblad 500 CM. I know a friend that has about 10,000.00 in old professional film cameras and I told him better be unloading them now before they become expensive paper weights. I think the film renaissance is over, it was from about 2018-2023, the period when film cameras and film hit an all time high. Until someone makes a high quality 35mm camera like a Nikon FM at an affordable price, film photography is going to become closer to extinction.
@samue19919 ай бұрын
I don't think the continued extinction of Aerochrome is a good metric for measuring their willingness to ignore the community as there are some very serious technical limitations that are keeping Kodak from bringing it back-- mainly that their emulsion coating light tight rooms are no longer free of ambient infrared light. It would be WAYYYY too expensive for them to build new emulsion depositing tooling just because pink leaves look dope (which they definitely do).
@MarksPhoto9 ай бұрын
I believe the building they made it in is now a parking or industrial development lot.
@AdamAllen9 ай бұрын
As much as I love film photography (and being old enough to have only film at one point), all of these pop-up, off-color film stocks are so uninteresting. Having to rely on 1 color accurate film manufacturer and the ludicrous pricing has certainly played a roll in me going back to shooting digital more. This is also most likely why major camera brands aren't solely interested in doing R&D for a new film camera. We need a few more heroes to step it up in the world of film stocks.
@CalumetVideo9 ай бұрын
When I initially heard the comments from Kodak about continuing to make film until at least 2028, and continuing if there is a demand, I see this as a possible exit strategy for Kodak. Time will only tell, but I really believe that the resurgence by Kodak into the film market was something that that they believed was just a “short term trend” or “hype” and they played along with this not realizing that there is a serious demand for film. The question is, does Kodak set a higher benchmark for demand than what is the actual demand level? Only time will tell, but it is definitely concerning. Do I think film is dead? No! I do think that black and white film will continue to be manufactured by companies such as Ilford, Foma and Ferrania. I think there is a possibility of companies in China like Shanghai increasing production. If we lose Kodak, we will definitely lose good quality color and black and white film stocks. If Kodak does keep film manufacturing alive, they most likely continue manufacturing 35mm and possibly discontinue medium and large format. I can not understand how Kodak would think of discontinuing film when we have companies such as Leica, Fuji and Mint (Rollei) producing 35mm film cameras. This is definitely interesting.
@AmbercoolPhotography6 ай бұрын
No worries. Amazon will come in and say why not? Guess we can make it.
@anthonymiller89799 ай бұрын
While color film may be new to these two manufacturers these are not new companies, Harman is just a 2005 continuation/re-organization of Ilford which was founded in 1879 and Adox started in 1860 making them both older than Kodak.
There's always bulkloading Fomapan and developing in Caffinol! I'd rather shoot black and white permanently than these weird color films with barely any latitude if kodak decides to pull the plug.
@goldenhourkodak9 ай бұрын
Imagine if film was easy to make. We'd have endless options and it would be cheap.
@Flburr999 ай бұрын
Christopher Nolan will single handedly keep Eastman Kodak film in production for a long time. He pretty much only shoots film. 50D, 250D, 500T, and double X (cut for IMAX for the very first time for Oppenheimer).
@semperfi-19189 ай бұрын
I find fujifilm at wallmart. But 1 or 2 packages at a time.
@gobgobcachoo9 ай бұрын
People have been saying this for 20 years. 😅
@Being_Joe7 ай бұрын
Novelty film stocks, exactly.
@shaynejenkins4469 ай бұрын
Kodak Eastman has contracts with Kodak Alaris until 2029. So we will have to see what happens then.
@gabvideo9 ай бұрын
For the vast majority of people film photography is already dead and buried and confined to history. No one I know uses film. Even digicams are history. All their picture taking is done using smartphones. Film is now a small niche/hobbies market relying on a few remaining manufacturers keeping film production going as long as it makes some sort of profit. After all these companies are not charities.
@AlecBuxton2 ай бұрын
Fuji doesn't make film anymore they get film from Kodak and repackage it under their label Film photography has gone from bring a mass product for everyone Has become an elitist product because of cost and supply cameras on mobile phones and digital photography more or less destroyed film photography because it's cheaper and more convenient but you don't get the same tactile memories with digital that you get with film photography
@mylesrosss8 ай бұрын
Lomography has lomo 800
@terencelaubach65659 ай бұрын
Gone and not coming back, the sad truth as far as I can tell. My favorite color film back in the day (70's and 80's) was Kodachrome 25. Gone. Black&white was and is Tri-X. Held off long as I could then bought a digital camera in 2014. I shoot color digitally and then sometimes a roll of b&w in a Leica I bought in 84. Hate seeing that camera otherwise just sitting there. When and if Kodak finally folds it'll then be Ilford all the way (hopefully) and color will have to be captured with a sensor. I have a friend with foresight who enjoys the film process in the now and has spent $$ to stock up on film and refrigerates it in anticipation of the factories closing. Thanks for your well prepared and presented video. And, we better get out there and take some more pictures before it's too late!
@CalumetVideo9 ай бұрын
I actually have a small stock of film, my favorite was Kodachrome, I tried to get a roll to shoot the last roll in 2009, but it was sold out and online auctions wanted crazy prices like 75.00 a roll, now you can find them old useless expired rolls of Kodachrome for next to nothing. I use a Nikon DF digital for most of my color work, and Nikon D800’s for professional work. My film camera is a Leica M3, Hasselblad 500 C/M which mostly gets used with Black and White film. I do think the days of color film is coming to an end.
@thomasa.2439 ай бұрын
What a lot of people forget is the following: It took Kodak 80 years to reach the level of Portra. What Adox, Harman or Orwo are doing is basically on the level that was in the 60s. Look at colour negatives from back then, horrible 🤣. I doubt however that they will ever reach the level of 90s colour negative because they don't have the money from the market. Black and white film will stay, for sure. Colour, hmm, yeah, hmm, yeah... Miss Fujifilm Superia and Agfa Vista 😢. At least we still have, for now, Kodak Gold.
@thomasa.2439 ай бұрын
@@lelandfitz1762 yup, I think there was a misunderstanding because English is not my first language 😅. What I meant is that they have to relearn things for production that were learned by the big companies already in the 60s. Of course there are still people around that have worked back in the 90s but setting up the machines correctly, getting everything to work properly, takes time and money. Plus, some chemicals used back then are probably no longer allowed. Polaroid had the same problem and it took them 10 years, despite having the original machines and people, to get a formula that is close to Polaroid's formula from the 80s. P.S. Isn't NC500 the same film as Lomography Color 92? It appears to be it 🤔
@thomasa.2439 ай бұрын
@@lelandfitz1762 I remember a documentary on Arte TV channel (French/German/Pan European, in case you don't know) from back in the days when the Impossible Project had announced their first film. They said something like: "Polaroid has used chemicals that are forbidden since the late 90s. But due to them still producing film, they were allowed to still use them. Replacing them is not as easy as one might think because it means not only replacing a single component but completely redesigning it from scratch." They also hinted at that being the reason that Polaroid has stopped producing film. They bought the last batch of chemicals, produced the last batch of film and then thought that it will last well into the 2010s. But people bought more than expected and redesigning the film was not feasible for Polaroid.
@scotthullinger46843 ай бұрын
If film were still widely available, as well as good professional processing - at least for medium format photography - and if I had plenty of money, and plenty of storage space, then I would shoot nothing but film, except for particular sorts of photography which demand digital -