The very idea posited by Euro- and Afro-centrists (or any individual attempting to idealize a historical group) that a lack of direct statements linking individuals to trends in their society, particularly in societies of which they were a leader, should be seen as evidence of their abstention from those practices isn't just bad source-reading, it's downright anti-historical. If there isn't a record documenting their personal views and policy on a topic, we must assume that whatever their personal beliefs they at least tolerated and abided the norms of their times. Otherwise, wouldn't somebody have mentioned it as being unusual? We can fantasize all we want about historical figures we admire sharing our views and being admirable by our modern standards, but unless there's some documentation to back them they're just fantasies. I might be (and am) fervently in favor of nuclear power as an alternative to hydrocarbons, but if I became President of the US and failed to make that a cornerstone of my policy and legacy historians would rightly assume that I was functionally tolerant and in favor of hydrocarbons as a primary source of power for my country. By the same token, if Mansa Musa didn't take action to abolish or reduce slavery in a way which could be seen in the historical records, or make public speeches railing against the evils of slavery and pronouncing the freedom of all previous royal slaves, why should we assume that he was personally anti-slavery? I'm all for humanizing and praising historical cultures and figures as a way to empower people and encourage others to feel self-worth and pride in their heritage. But the emphasis should be on *humanizing*, not idealizing. I don't want future generations to look back at our leaders and see some perfect marble staties to whom all future leaders should aspire, I want them to look back and see humans who made good decisions and terrible mistakes-- both of which can be learned from. Fully in support of you not backing down at all in this. It's all well and good for people to make snide critiques and casual commentary on history on Twitter, but if they want to wade into source-based historical arguments they'd better be ready to put up or shut up and know the rules of the space they're entering.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Thanks so much for the lengthy and detailed post. I fully agree there's a real danger of retrojecting our own ideals onto historical figures, and this has been aa constant problem with Eurocentric history, never mind anyone else. This kind of anarchronism is veryh tempting, but as you note there are very simple ways to check the likelihood (if not certainty), of a historical figure's views. Thank you so much for your support!
@bmeiji5 ай бұрын
I love your comment and my exact feelings about this subjects.
@saratmodugu27215 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritasare you going to do a video Isaac Samuel’s claim of servants not slaves
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@saratmodugu2721 yes, and I have nearly finished the script. I am taking some time to look at the lexical sources in Arabic, and I have needed some help with that since I have no competence in Arabic.
@saratmodugu27215 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas btw great video. I stopped taking Greathouse seriously when he started yapping that Europeans didn’t invent a single instrument until the early modern era. Now he’s yapping about chivalry of knights came from arabs that defected from the umayyads to the carolingians after the battle of tours.
@intello89534 ай бұрын
I’m Somali and many years ago I started learning about my own country, East Africa and Africa as a whole. So as I was researching I started watching a documentary called Hidden Colours and I thought to myself this is interesting but then it got ridiculous and when they said certain monarchs in the last couple centuries in Europe were black I just turned the documentary off. Like whyyyyyyy? Africa has so many cultures and civilisation why do they need to make up random stuff that has literally nothing to do with Africa in most cases 🤦🏾♂️
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Thanks for your contribution! I think people aiming to convince others of Africa's value by trying to connect Africa to European history, have completely the wrong approach and are ironically Eurocentric. Africa has its own value completely independently of Europe.
@trevormcdonald3854 ай бұрын
The thing is while I don’t agree that they were black you also need to understand that many places around the world had PROTO black populations. Take the aborigines, the Melanesians, the sentalese among others. These people got absorbed by other populations and today we only see remnants of them.
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
@@trevormcdonald385 yes absolutely. I live in Taiwan, where the aboriginal people are darker skinned descendants of Austronesians.
@trevormcdonald3854 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas Pas-ta'ai (Chinese: 矮靈祭; pinyin: Ǎilíngjì), the "Ritual to the Spirits of the Short [People]", is a ritual of the Saisiyat people, a Taiwanese aboriginal group. The ritual commemorates the Ta'ai, a tribe of short dark-skinned people they say used to live near them. The ritual is held every two years and all Saisiyat are expected to participate. As I understand it these are not the only people in the world with similar traditions..
@kingsleyoji6494 ай бұрын
It's also easy to conflate time periods. For example, the Moorish presence in Europe and the resultant presence of African descendents through Europe, artwork from the time corroborating. Now does that mean that Black people founded or are responsible for everything European. Not necessarily. It is interesting nevertheless.
@kudjoeadkins-battle25025 ай бұрын
I don't understand why Mansa Musa wouldn't have owned slaves.
@superwatcher4565 ай бұрын
He did, and no need for apologetics. He was who he was and he made his nation strong, judging him by presentism western values is meh
@kudjoeadkins-battle25025 ай бұрын
@@superwatcher456 I concur.
@philipsalama80835 ай бұрын
The same reason why many Americans try to downplay slavery in their country - both groups over identity with their ancestors (or the people they think were their ancestors, in some cases). They take pride in the ancestor's achievements, and get personally offended when the ancestor's imperfections are pointed out. They feel like they're being personally attacked.
@kudjoeadkins-battle25025 ай бұрын
@@philipsalama8083 perhaps they should not feel that way.
@thenamewhowillknockksidown73335 ай бұрын
shocking fact , every race owned slaves , and sold slaves , even Europeans sold other Europeans it is how it worked backed then , todays politics dont apply to yesterdays world
@redjem69185 ай бұрын
An Afrocentrist cited an antiquarian published in 1829 as proof that the ancient Scots were actually Black Africans. She even included a scan of the actual page from the book. The book was, of course, the author's own idiosyncratic interpretation of the Bible. The absurdity of these people is breathtaking.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
This is the kind of blunder Great House makes on a regular basis.
@redjem69185 ай бұрын
@@BTL_LTW "An Afrocentrist..."
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@BTL_LTW no one said he made any such claim.
@redjem69185 ай бұрын
@BTL_LTW we regard white supremacists as absurd and worthy of condemnation. Meanwhile the internet - YT, FB, even TikTok - is awash with Afrocentric revisionism. Little to none of it attracts the attention of the powers that be.
@redjem69185 ай бұрын
@@BTL_LTW My previous reply seems to have gone astray, but anyway I have to thank you for wasting 10 minutes and 16 seconds of my life on a video by this Sepehr character (who I had never heard of), most of which is not about Mansa Musa and during which Sepehr never actually claims that Mansa Musa is "white". He obliquely mentions "white Berbers" and raises the issue of "blackwashing" images (a practice we know is common among internet afrocentrists). So once again, thanks for nothing.
@ronc77434 ай бұрын
I once saw a BBC documentary on Mansa Musa. It was an hour long puff piece praising him as the richest man in history claiming his wealth came from gold mines. The BBC presenter was black, and she NEVER mentioned he was a slave owner. Also, it amazes me the number of people that try to justify inter African slavery saying it "wasn't chattle slavery like in America." I'm sure slaves at the time could have taken comfort if they knew that.
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Yes I'm sure the slaves didn't see it like that.
@rzella80224 ай бұрын
Just like Kamala Harris' ancestors owning slaves, that were probably all happy, so okay.
@Lolibeth4 ай бұрын
Who did she think *worked* those mines? Fairies?
@sephikong83234 ай бұрын
Also, I'm pretty sure that past the initial travel through the Atlantic, American slaves had a higher life expectancy than those that stayed in Africa (we won't even mention those were sent to the Middle East, that truly was the nightmare ending) since they were more expensive to buy due to the cost and dangers of the travel, as such their owners had a greater incentive to have them *not* die, compared to Africa where slaves were very plentiful so replacing the lost ones was less of an issue for slave owners back there. I really don't see how you can gloss over this as if it's somewhat a "lesser evil" when it was something so profoundly entrenched in African societies
@cccycling58354 ай бұрын
@@LolibethNo you see, the slaves that worked the mines WANTED to mine gold. They were better off in the mines anyway.
@WillemFick4 ай бұрын
I live in a part of Africa where revisionist afro-centrism is almost a religion. I am so happy to see someone who has the knowledge and time to point out the selective nature of their understanding of history.
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Thank you.
@WillemFick4 ай бұрын
@@BTL_LTWnope, not the case at all. Just opposed to those who are forever appropriating european history to try to gain some clout.
@joeman685854 ай бұрын
as a ugandan; him saying idi amin did no wrong pisses me off.
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Yeah that is just typical of his reactionary inflammatory rhetoric.
@michaelpettersson49194 ай бұрын
Idi Amin was a disaster for Uganda. Just as similar people has been a disaster in other nations.
@derekroundtree54543 ай бұрын
Idi Amin is literally africas Hitler, can’t believe he said this shit
@borkistanon41943 ай бұрын
It's the equivalent of a Russian-American saying Ratko Mladić did nothing wrong
@YouAreNowBreathingManually3 ай бұрын
"idi amin did nothing wrong!" *some random lake with two suspicious sacks and a car*
@ItsJustCartier5 ай бұрын
Haven’t fully watched the video yet but just reading Afrocentrist in title kills me. There is so much history in Africa that’s very interesting and to be proud of its just rarely talked about without glorifying it as more advanced then Rome or the British Empire.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
There is good and bad Afrocentrism; you could skip to 24:26 Academic versus populist Afrocentrism.
@ItsJustCartier5 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas There defiantly is which is also the saddest part about it. There were civil rights leaders championing this back then with the right direction just from what I’ve read. Sadly when ever this topic gets brought up it always feels like the bad ones get more light for saying pseudo history instead of a more grounded view. Anyway keep up the great work I always love your citations. It feels like I’m back in AP history class getting a mini project that introduces topics I usually would write off as boring or not important.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@ItsJustCartier thank you so much!
@salj.54595 ай бұрын
Why do you assume that it *wasn't* more advanced than Rome or Britain? That's your Eurocentrism speaking
@ItsJustCartier5 ай бұрын
@@salj.5459 I used those examples only to point out that most the time when Afrocentrism’s like one in the video make claims they usually make general claims like “the Romans were advanced but not as advanced as X African nation” without going into their reasoning. Which it could be true in some regards but that’s far from the points people make like the one in the video.
@peterwindhorst57755 ай бұрын
Most of these afro-centrists cite Musa as some sort of superman, but if he was truly as powerful as they thought he is, his empire would have lasted AFTER his death and the death of his children. Qin Shi Huang died, his children died, but the territorial extent of his empire remained under the Han Dynasty. Meanwhile Musa's empire collapse within a generation of his death.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
He has certainly been lionized beyond his historical significance, like many European rulers. However I did find Samuel Isaacs' article much more balanced. www.africanhistoryextra.com/p/the-myth-of-mansa-musas-enslaved
@forickgrimaldus83015 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritasTBF to Mansa and European Monarchs like Richard I and Baldwin the Leper King there are many Legendarily remembered rulers that get similar treatment round the Globe, Liu Bei for example in Chinese history in the grand scheme of things didn't do much for Chinese history but was deified, though this doesn't make them not impressive in their own ways, people just idealise them way too much.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@forickgrimaldus8301 very true, Charlemagne as well. Ironically I think Charlemagne is heroized for the wrong thing; he's typically held up as a great political unifier of Europe, when I think his most important contribution was his support of the Carolingian Renaissance.
@forickgrimaldus83015 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas I think he reformed how Latin is spoken too essentially forming the basis for modern Ecclisiastical Latin so the guy did a lot but yeah Charlemagne's "Unification of Europe" wasn't Universal to Europe and didn't really last too long but it did form the basis of Medieval Geopolitics for generations after him, so not as successful in creating a Unified state but he did a lot of other things.
@Woozy.04 ай бұрын
I disagree, as mismanagement by the inheritors is largely why we aren't all speaking Mongolian.
@Voidsworn5 ай бұрын
It's a fricken shame. The history of Africa should be learned about, but GH seems like they are doing a great disservice to it. Mythologizing countries and cultures do no good, only serves to blind us to our faults and history, which serves those in power
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
It's also trustrating because he didn't start off like this. He made the decision to take this direction.
@Voidsworn5 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas I've heard of the term "narcissistic wound" applying to the ego of individuals, something that hurts our sense of self. I think there is a cultural version of this such that some people belonging to that wounded culture/people will express the kind of narcissistic like behavior that (regarding their history) is seen with GH and others.
@TheLetsRead5 ай бұрын
Just seems “hotep” adjacent, if not already there?
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@TheLetsRead adjacent yes, but he strongly rejects the Hoteps. The real issue is that he doesn't post good Afrocentric content these days. He just posts inflammatory content about European history, attempting to rage bait white nationalists.
@starmaker755 ай бұрын
Especially since in the Americans, west Africa did play a role in shaping both Latin America and Anglo America
@amandarecoveryjones82164 ай бұрын
Great work. Please keep doing this. Im personally sick of these false and biased "teachers"....
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@GreayWorks5 ай бұрын
Funny enough I recently went down a rabbit hole of witch hunts, mainly studying about Witchfinder General Hopkins, and the reality of what is widely believed to have happened is already bad enough as is that just making stuff up about the history of witch hunts just kind of invalidates what happened
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Oh yes, I have done some work on that myself. kzbin.info/www/bejne/lWSTm3xvisx8jM0
@mama-nono36524 ай бұрын
I used to be a sucker too. Anybody who was able to spout "sources" with names and page numbers and paragraphs, I was sold. Then by chance I went to a lecture and happened to actually go home and check his sources. Well, I was floored when I saw that he had massively skewered the information. Never trusted anything from anybody again without checking the source myself.
@locke86285 ай бұрын
It’s a shame too, African History is genuinely fascinating and interesting , particularly how it much differs from Europe, now everything from European is apparently just from Africa
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Yes, populist Afrocentrism ironically just looks like jealousy and rejection of real African history.
@Prometheus72724 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritasAfrocentrism is actually Eurocentrism unironically 😂. It’s all jealousy.
@Ace-sb4il4 ай бұрын
Alot of it is though. 😂😂😂. You can read the classics and see how many times Ethiopia is mentioned and pick up on how the Greeks and Romans revered them.
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
@@Ace-sb4il yes a lot of it is. In fact I had to explain to someone recently how much medieval Christianity was shaped by three African theologians; Tertullian, Athanasius, and Augustine. Their theology has influenced tens of millions of Christians for over 1,000 years.
@dananderson66974 ай бұрын
I am willing to bet every single populist afrocentrist in existence will declare those three Africans evidence of European meddling in Africa, though. All three of them belonged to a church that will *inevitably* be linked to white Europeans.
@craigenem4 ай бұрын
Isn't it obvious that the point of Great House videos aren't made for accuracy. They're made to appeal to emotions because that's Unfortunately what gets far more views and YT revenue
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Yes.
@noldorwarrior77914 ай бұрын
"Did you know there original Irish were Aztecs? No? Research!. No, but research the book i personally wrote. Still dont believe it? Its because you are not ready for the truth." They are always using this pattern.
@ThePanEthiopian4 ай бұрын
Owning slaves is a known thing in Africa.
@PineappleDealer374 ай бұрын
Every nation of the world invented two things - Slavery and cheese
@chriscormac2314 ай бұрын
It's still happening there
@pentuplemintgum6664 ай бұрын
To address the wooly mammoth/uhaul truck tweet from the first few minutes. You would stop a 24mph uhaul the same way our ancestors put down a mammoth with a spear. You puncture a vital organ and then follow the trail to your prize. For someone claiming to be afrocentric, he should absolutely know what persistence hunting is. That itself is enough to disregard anything he says, in my opinion.
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
After he was shown several articles proving he was wrong he backed down a bit and modified his original claim, but later returned to it and doubled down. At this point it was difficult to avoid the conclusion he was trolling or grifting or both.
@lb5403 ай бұрын
Persistance hunting is from our current understanding unlikely to have been used in any frequency. No hominid was ever able to keep pace with a large herbivore at flight speed, creating a extremely high risk of loosing sight of the intended prey. Skeletons of prey animals hunted by humans are also mostly of healthy adults in their prime, but persistance hunter would primarily catch juveniles or old and injured animals. This points more towards coordinated ambush hunting, this is also supported by the remains of human made pit traps.
@pentuplemintgum6663 ай бұрын
@@lb540 that's not how persistence hunting works. The very reason it works is that you're not trying to keep pace with the animal. Youre following from a distance. Also, sweat glands play a huge role. Can you figure out why?
@someguy78195 ай бұрын
Your videos are so good because of how well you cite your work. I feel like a lot of people who talk about history just use a single wiki article
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Thank you so much!
@lionelmessisburner73935 ай бұрын
Wiki is still really useful though. Especially bc it has many valid sources that it links
@someguy78195 ай бұрын
@@lionelmessisburner7393 yeah the sources may be good. But there are also wrong or outdated sources. And wiki is also very broad when talking about some historic events especially if it's something from before the early modern era.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@lionelmessisburner7393 when read carefully as a tertiary source, it can be useful as a starting point for sources on a subject, but the sources cited aren't always good quality so they do need to be checked. Perosonally I prefer to look at an online academic bibliography. veritas-et-caritas.com/index.php/research-sources-freely-accessible-online-material/#scholarly_bibliographies
@TheLetsRead5 ай бұрын
Agreed! This is setting me down a (hopefully educational) rabbit hole hahaha.
@GlurglePop4 ай бұрын
I wouldn’t waste any more time on this nobody. Twitter/X has the same effect as alcohol on the confidence of non-smart people.
@finnmcginn99314 ай бұрын
Spot on.
@PlatinumAltaria5 ай бұрын
Europe and Africa: have evidence of bidirectional trade for thousands of years Nationalists: "I'll pretend I didn't see that."
@bensantos38825 ай бұрын
You need to better understand and clear up what parts of Africa. In the modern sense, we assume Africa=black. North Africans traded and interacted with European exploration for over 3k years. What we found out is the fact these were Caucasoid peoples. No evidence whatsoever of blacks getting on ships they built and explored the open seas.
@adorablecockroach51315 ай бұрын
Northern Africa (mostly Egypt) was part of the Roman Empire so, yeah? Do people not know that Rome got most of their grain from Egypt?
@forickgrimaldus83015 ай бұрын
@@adorablecockroach5131 and modern day Tunisia, Carthage provided Rome the City itself with much of its vital grain
@hopeundertheblacksun5 ай бұрын
@@adorablecockroach5131 not black,try again
@ProxiProtogen5 ай бұрын
Average TNO fan@@hopeundertheblacksun
@Dobertson4 ай бұрын
This was just randomly in my recommended but i really enjoyed this roasting/history lesson. 😂 thank you. Subbed
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Thank you! You might like the video I made before this one, about my first encounter Great House. Check the link in the video description.
@Pompeius_Strabo5 ай бұрын
Thanks for providing Dr. Adeleke’s paper, it’s sounds very interesting!
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
You're welcome. Adeleke is a well respected professional in the field, so he is worth reading.
@TheLetsRead5 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritasNot to brown-nose even further, but I’m checking out the book which you shared alongside suggesting the article & look forward to engaging with it. Thank you for bringing it to wider attention!
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@TheLetsRead you're welcome. I really should do a video on Afrocentrism as a topic, and the different forms it takes.
@salj.54595 ай бұрын
2:57 It was a pilgrimage to Mecca, Egypt was just a stop along the way
@JustRandomSymbols5 ай бұрын
A beef between a youtuber and an academic... Ngl, the sheer contrast between you two in your interactions is fascinating
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Thank you, I certainly hope the distinction is clear to viewers.
@georgejoestarii94694 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas Sir, these afrocentrists were like flat earthers.
@rzella80224 ай бұрын
@@georgejoestarii9469 No comparison. Those who dig deep trying to seriously debunk flat earth, almost always end up convinced. Afrocentrism comes from inferiority complex.
@Swaggedoutshorty4 ай бұрын
@@rzella8022They got conquered so hard it fried their brains! Or more likely their brains were already fried and that’s why they were partitioned lol
@Mixran4 ай бұрын
D
@HistoriaVids5 ай бұрын
Very good video, and also good on you with being logical and sticking your boots to the ground when facing this kind of drama.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@orlandhoward95304 ай бұрын
Black roots in my family. DO NOT APOLOGIZE TO A MERE RACE BAITER AND DENYER OF FACTS OR TRUTH..
@MrBlaqgold2 күн бұрын
Black roots in my family??? 😂😂😂😂 who doesnt have black roots in their family? Everyone from earth has black roots
@Groggle71414 ай бұрын
I’m African and this twitter account is embarrassing. We should learn the truth about every society’s history, whether good or bad.
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@lelagrangeeffectphysics41203 ай бұрын
This whole situation stinks of ego, no side wants to back down since backing down means defeat, and the more controversy that is generated the more people pay attention to it, it is vicious cycle that feeds itself and leads to greater feats of idiocy.
@OsirisMawnАй бұрын
No need to be. Because these are African Americans. Hardly represent us
@glennisholcomb5924 ай бұрын
Now, from what I understand about mimosa, Samosa ruled after the time of Abu Barker and one of the things that Islam brought with it in the area was it did bring in a culture of slavery, but to say that slavery itself wasn’t a feature before the coming Islam to the area would be a misstatement so I think it would be harder to prove that Mimosa did not bring slaves, but I will ask the question what were the conditions of those slaves and we had to understand that the whole area was operating like that for 1200 years I mean, this is before the onset of the Portuguese. So I think that is tougher to prove that massa didn’t or was not involved the slave trade.
@anthonycrumb57534 ай бұрын
Slavery in Mali ? ? In 1993 or thereabouts I travelled around Mali, Mopti, Djene and the Dogon Country - The Falasie de Bandigara. Travelling from Mopti to the South West end of the Falaise with a truly excellent Dogon guide, Belco Bah, who I belive may have contributed to the Lonely Planet Guide, we passed through a village to buy some fire wood or at least the othet passengers did that were literally crammed with us in the taxi bruse/bush taxi. The inhabitants of this village were a mixture of ethnic groups, Bambara, Bozo, Dogon, Puel, identifiable by their dress. I asked Belco why all these differnt people were living together rather than in their own villages and he told me they were all ex- slaves that had been freed but because they were ex-slaves they couldn't return to their villages so eked out a living selling firewood to passing vechicles like ours. I consider Belco a reliable source of information, so not so long ago, towards the end of the 20th century there must have been some enslaved people around in Mali . Mali is a fantastic country to vist well, well worth any discomfort, the bush taxis by the way are or were the worst of anywhere.
@MatthewNewman5 ай бұрын
there are still real humans on twitter?
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
A few.
@TS-jm7jm5 ай бұрын
not really, and this isnt one of them
@TheKiltedGerman4 ай бұрын
Definitions are important. If you define "-centrism" as looking at history through the perspective of that particular demographic, fine and dandy. Each civilization is going to look at events differently. As long as you don't let -centrism give you historical tunnel vision, I don't see a problem. If we define "-centrism" as using history to prove a one group as universally superior to another throughout history, that's cringey as heck and should be disputed regardless civilization it stands for. You get this kind with every historical demographic you can think of. Everyone has a chip on his shoulder from some past slight in history, quite obnoxious.
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Very true.
@foshershmul16483 ай бұрын
I saw a thread by an Indian that used a “Roman map of the 2nd century” to make the argument that Europeans in the 14th century were inferior sailors. Then he used a map by those inferior sailors to prove Indian nationalism. Then called to throw off colonial perspectives.
@veritasetcaritas3 ай бұрын
Some people are desparate.
@LS-jv9hp2 ай бұрын
They're still coping about the Indo-European migrations and the British to this day lmao
@electricVGC5 ай бұрын
Hopefully we see better representation of academic Afrocentrism in the mainstream in future
@MrSporkster5 ай бұрын
In my experience, Afrocentrism is pseudoscientific by default.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
I would like to make a video as a guide to Afrocentrism.
@ItsJustCartier5 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritasThat would be a very cool video. You could even point out some Eurocentric views in comparison.
@TheLetsRead5 ай бұрын
@@MrSporksterThat’s uncharitable to the extreme. I hope that OP is able to provide you with a more nuanced framework of the subject & the individuals who have attempted to articulate it.
@Cat_Guevara5 ай бұрын
Continent-centrism is dumb by default.
@kmenzies6014 ай бұрын
I find it much more interesting that slavery was so common in Mali that at one time one of the most powerful men in Mali, a general, was a slave at the same time. Why does this matter? Because of what it says about the institution of slavery and how much its personal implications varied from society to society.
@rzella80224 ай бұрын
And the word 'slave' itself comes from slavic peoples of Europe.
@vibeamv859Ай бұрын
As a black man learning about my ancestry, is it really a question that Mali had slaves, i have always thought that almost every civilization has had slaves. Now don't get me wrong i am not comparing the slavery to the Colonial Period slavery as how the slavery happened and how the slaves were treated was a crime not against black people but against humanity.
@saraaberdeen125 ай бұрын
You're work is very much so appreciated and clearly well researched thank you . Video Idea historical Africa clothing and how to adapted it for fantasy shows like House of the Dragon .
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@MenwithHill5 ай бұрын
Found this video by the grace of the algorithm, great channel and thanks for your rigorous content!
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Thank you so much!
@interiordagoth5 ай бұрын
Thank you for your hard work in dispelling pseudo history.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
You're welcome.
@interiordagoth5 ай бұрын
By the way I hear you are an anarchist do you believe in a certain theory within anarchism?@@veritasetcaritas
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@interiordagoth yes, I am an anarcho-mutualist. kzbin.info/www/bejne/eoLMipihis9-j9U&ab_channel=AcademicAnarchist
@interiordagoth5 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas interesting I myself am probably a mix of an syndicalist and an communist. Anyway, keep up the good work!
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@interiordagoth thanks!
@MrBlaqgold2 күн бұрын
Thanks for the reference, just subscribed to Great House.
@robespierejr3 ай бұрын
This is just yakubian tricknology at its finest
@UnDark14 ай бұрын
They weren’t slaves. Just unpaid interns.
@istoppedcaring62094 ай бұрын
I do tend to believe the extreme numbers of slaves mentioned, at this time massive slave caravans were moving from sub saharan africa to Libya and from there to the entire Arab world (which in part fueled the Hasj rebellions) slavery also takes different forms, from Roman practices we know that some slaves would carry far more weight due to who they represented than any free person could hope to have, if the personal slave of Marcus Aurelius enters a jewelry store and he wants to buy a piece that the wife of a senator is planning to buy as well the shopkeeper is absolutely going to sell to the slave and the wife of the senator would probably be totally ok with it since she would also know who she'd be offending if she'd even complain. On the other hand it doesn't matter who your master is if you are a slave in a silvermine (asside from paying restitution for dammages to their master when hurting these slaves) Mali was absolutely a slave society and in fact the Portuguese addopted west African (and perhaps arab) practices when they developed the early plantation slavery. Had African slavery been lighter even personal as a rule they would not have sold them to Europeans after finding out the purpose. (looking at Ottoman- Arab slavery the divide in treatment was mostly ethnic based on price, attraction and abbilities. (black male slaves were used to work hard labour on farms and in mines, black female slaves were used as nursery maids, european and other white varieties were more of a status symbol and that counted tripple for females, males captured in battle were often used as galley slaves which shows that ethnicity allone was not everything.
@burtonthegrape92174 ай бұрын
I really hate those kinds of people, it's so disrespectful to so many great cultures, the history and facts don't matter though only their political implications.
@GA-1st5 ай бұрын
You've clarified the record, mostly by repeating points you'd already made explicit in your original video. I hope you realize this is an exercise in futility. "Great House" will not concede nor discontinue the slipshod quality of his work, and will continue to misstate and mischaracterize your critiques ad infinitum. I'd suggest you ignore any response he may offer and simply move on. Otherwise, it will undoubtedly devolve into something neither constructive nor pleasant.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
I don't think he will respond to this video, but yes I agree there's no point in pursuing these points with him. I may make additional videos demonstrating his reserach errors on other sujbects, such as failing to identify when he is using an oudated source, or using a work of fiction as if it was a work of history.
@nunyabiznes334 ай бұрын
"Do not argue with idiots. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with their experience" something something
@erdood32355 ай бұрын
It's not like any oppressed peoples, black people, Jews, who can be also Black, are inherently morally better than peoples that oppresse them. It's a matter of circumstances and opportunities and interests.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
They are not morally better, but they have historically been treated cruelly in ways which significantly disadvantage their modern day descendants. This is not the case with many other groups.
@erdood32355 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas i meant that it's not that black or Jews, due to being oppressed, have never and can never be oppressors themselves.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@erdood3235 yes I agree with that, and historically they sometimes have been oppressors themselves.
@erdood32355 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas yes, and today many Black African leaders and the South Africa communist party support Russia's war against the people in Ukraine, Jews, Romani, tatars, Ukrainians and others. I'm a queer child to Jews from USSR Ukraine.
@ftftyffghfvghfcht67015 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas how are black people disadvantaged nowadays by historical oppression which everyone basically faced and most of which they inflicted upon themselves?
@hodaka10005 ай бұрын
How many witches were executed in small towns and villages without being recorded ?
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
We can't be exactly sure, but historians make estimates of how many were likely to have been killed in such cases without being recorded, and add that to the estimated total. So the scholarly consensus includes executions for which we have no evidence and which may or may not have happened. It's a deliberate over-estimate of the most likely total figure.
@TheGahta4 ай бұрын
None, there are no witches
@hodaka10004 ай бұрын
@@TheGahta Did watch this video ?
@ChUnGuShh4 ай бұрын
New to the channel been binge watching for a few hours. Amazing content ❤
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@ChUnGuShh4 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas no sir. Thank you for all the hardwork you put into your videos. Good luck for your future endeavours 👍
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
@@ChUnGuShh thanks!
@AtomskTheMynahBird4 ай бұрын
Is ok to call him black supremacists
@rafaeloyarzun63374 ай бұрын
The only real attention i ever gave to that user was when they claimed that Humans didn't hunt Mammoths despite the almost absurd and easy to find amount of evidence that suggested otherwise. Im fairly sure to this day that they still think Humans didn't hunt them, or at least they aren't completely convinced.
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Yeah at first I think they realised they were wrong, and started backing off, but when more people called them out for it they reversed strategy and doubled down.
@dankemusico58784 ай бұрын
This video is a good example of why you should read your sources carefully and try to find other sources that backup the claim rather than just taking it as face value.
@starmaker755 ай бұрын
It a shame that African (especially northern and western) history get ruined by popular history stuff like Afrocentrist or the people acting like "Africa doesn't have that munch" because there is some cool stuff like the three kingdoms control a big potion of west Africa.
@hopeundertheblacksun5 ай бұрын
African history is garbage without north Africa
@anthonycrumb57534 ай бұрын
Mansa Musa did not have slaves ? See my post on ex saves I saw in Mali n 1993. Why try and rewrite history ?
@kudjoeadkins-battle25025 ай бұрын
Awesome Video. Subscribed.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@doraemon4024 ай бұрын
It appears I care more about African history that these African mythologists
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Very likely.
@kudjoeadkins-battle25025 ай бұрын
As an Afrocentrist I am appalled at some of his claims. I am more appalled however that every thing that black "talking heads" talk about is called Afrocentric.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
I don't think that everything black "talking heads" talk about is Afrocentric. In fact I make the point that Great House himself spends most of his time making false claims about European history, instead of promoting Afrocentrism.
@kudjoeadkins-battle25025 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas I noticed as the video went on. I do have a problem with everything that is said by a black person is at times, and by many deemed Afrocentric. That term has like many others become another way to just dismiss anything coming from those of us who are African and tend to challenge the idea of some eternal western hegemony.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@kudjoeadkins-battle2502 yes I think it's lazy and unfair to take an individual and represent them as a whole. That's why I wrote in the video description "Great House is unrepresentative of Afrocentrism and Afrocentrists..
@kudjoeadkins-battle25025 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas duly noted, and you did an excellent job in my opinion. I look forward to more information. I had come across you before, I forget the video. I thought I had subscribed to you back then. But I will certainly check you page out. I appreciate your response.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@kudjoeadkins-battle2502 thank you very much, I appreciate it.
@CharlesIsMyName5 ай бұрын
Great job man.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Thank you.
@averagejoe23074 ай бұрын
The funniest thing is that you can basically refute and "centrism" with "people just be doing shit everywhere"
@hgriff145 ай бұрын
im guessing this is the kind that thinks he himself taught my ancestors how to bathe? 😂
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Yes, he has made that claim also.
@kudjoeadkins-battle25025 ай бұрын
That's ridiculous. I challenge that one all of the time in my circles.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@kudjoeadkins-battle2502 don't worry, there are plenty of Europeans who believe this too. It's not just a Hotep talking point.
@kudjoeadkins-battle25025 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas LOL, I am aware. I grew up in a juxtaposed household without the volatile hate that may exist in others. As a young boy and being fascinated by the Romans I always thought the Moors taught them how to bathe to be a bit much. I counter that any anti bathing rhetoric in Western Europe back then would have been tied more to Christianity and not some innate lack of bathing etiquette.
@bernadmanny5 ай бұрын
I personally find the number of 500 sl**** highly plausible (though not definitive), if only from reading enough medieval histroy to read about how many attendants (who were noble or gentry class themselves) high status persons had and the servants that supported the whole retinue.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
I think it is unlikely given the amount of resources necessary for these people on a daily basis, espeecially on a long desert trip of over 3,000 kilometers. It's true that new resources could be purchased along the way, but 500 people is still a very large number of slaves to bring on such a lengthy journey in the first place, and even if every one of them only drank one liter of carried water a day that would still require carrying 500 liters of water, not to mention other provisions. This isn't comparable to a much shorter journey along a European river, or through a series of small European villages.
@redjem69185 ай бұрын
@veritasetcaritas the issue I have is that Arab slavers marched thousands across the Sahara, admittedly with a high attrition rate, but with sufficient returns to make the route viable. Armies too have made significant desert crossings with thousands of men. The devil is in the logistical details: if Mansa Musa had made adequate logistical arrangements before his journey (a likelihood) then it is entirely feasible to make the journey with the equivalent of a small army.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@redjem6918 it depends a lot on the distance and route. And of course that attrition rate is important. But if he had 500 slaves, who else went with him?
@nitronorman14914 ай бұрын
You are one of the unsung heroes of the internet. Those who do their research do their due diligence.
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Thank you.
@grancolombiaballproductions15 ай бұрын
Perhaps Afrocentrism is not that bad on an academic scale (this is a serious PERHAPS). However, the channels, influencers, and people that promote it make me and others doubt a lot about it. There is a channel called African Stream, which is relatively accurate in some of its political arguments regarding African leaders, but lately it has been doing a small campaign on saying how Argentina is very "racist" (which, as someone who knows this country well despite not being Argentine, is extremely untrue) and its literally just been ranting about how some countries in Latin America are resisting "US Imperialism". In general, the channel just centers on the african communities of several countries outside of africa and calls most if not all interactions from latin america with the US "imperialism and exploitation" (something that, as someone from Panama and Venezuela, is not true lol). It also promotes a kind of "we vs them" kind of mentality. This is reflected in the comments, which instead of being about political correctness and improvements, say about how every country descended from europeans or with high heritage (Argentina, for example) will have the same flaws and is bad (something that is, ironically extremely racist and just as racist as insulting any African country). In conclusion, I mean that Academic Afrocentrism probably has much to offer. However, its representation with the people of that community, which can often be rather populist, is extremely bad and ruins the very concept with its own representatives and people that promote it, being honest.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Yes I know Afrocentrism isn't well represented on social media. The channel to which you refer sounds very much like it's a populist Afrocentrist source which is Hotep-adjacent.
@doggerlander5 ай бұрын
I can debate you on the argentina being racist thing
@TheEvolver3115 ай бұрын
Do you go around posting diatrides against the far more numerous and common European ethnographic supremacy history channels? Or does it only motivate you to act against these kinds of ideologies when the group is Black ?
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@TheEvolver311 firstly this is not a diatribe, this is a response to a personal attack. Secondly most of my channel attacks right wing and Eurocentric narratives. I have an entire playlist called "Fight the Right" with fifteen videos in it, I have five videos targeting a right-wing leaning libertarian KZbinr, and I have several other videos discrediting Eurocentric colonialist myths and exposing colonial damage to indigenous people. Not only that, but I have more pro-black and African content on my channel than Great House has ever produced. Have you ever seen him create a 56 minute pro-black history video like this? kzbin.info/www/bejne/fIeWpKxjhrx4has No you haven't. Have you ever seen him create a 35 minute anti-colonial video like this? kzbin.info/www/bejne/qpSxY2aperl7gdU No you haven't. Have you ever seen him create a 35 minute anti-white savior video like this? kzbin.info/www/bejne/qqHMpKqro7abapI No you haven't.
@TheEvolver3115 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas I was responding to the og post of this specific comment.
@djinnjax32745 ай бұрын
Fair enough.
@VaporCun4 ай бұрын
I remember my first argument with an afrocentrist many stereotypes of his people were proven that day...
@davidgriffin89584 ай бұрын
A great number of slaves would not have been a logistic nightmare they would have been needed as a logistic solution.
@talideon5 ай бұрын
4:18 - I think this is partially a particular kind of brainrot that we've seen in Ireland from Americans. It shouldn't exist, but it comes from an actual agenda. The agenda varies, but Irish people are the most constantly useful counterpoint because history is hard. Because if you only have to think about something very, very narrow without having to deal with the why, everything gets easier.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Yes I agree. I really don't like the habit of appealing to the Irish and historical instances of white people being enslaved (sucha s the Barbary pirate slave raids), in efforts to diminish the historical impact and horror of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade. I should make a video on why historical"white slavery" is irrelevant in the context of modern discussions of the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade.
@TheLetsRead5 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas Not to create too unwieldy of a tangent from the goal of countering modern-day Dunningesque perspectives on the Transatlantic Slave Trade, but I feel there is also fertile ground out there to connect white slavery non-histories & the anxieties they have reflected in North American & European white supremacist/colonial/imperial societies to their contemporary equivalents (ie. “anti-white racisms,” hyper-fixating on white victims of human trafficking, white South African farmers being dispossessed or whatever, etc etc etc).
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@TheLetsRead yes I agree.
@kovanova94094 ай бұрын
"Uh oh kiddo you just got, *radicalized!* "
@dg45455 ай бұрын
I appreciate you didn't fall down the culture war rabbit hole. I was expecting this video to go along the lines of: "tHiS wOKe LeFtIst SaYz ScOtS wErE bLAck!" or some other bs that other so called "historians" tend to shove down our throats. No name calling, very informative, no disrespect, no nonsense. I respect you kind sir👍
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Thank you. I despise culture war vultures who just grift off social conflict.
@dg45455 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas EXACTLY!!! I cannot stand social parasites that feed off of the misery of the world. Just to offer even more migraines with nonsense revisionism.
@dg45455 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas there should be more people like that.
@RedPigSpartan5 ай бұрын
Well I mean Afrocentristism is pseudo-history and attempt to colonize other cultures. @dg4545
@shereerabon85515 ай бұрын
Thank you.
@BedeGeneris4 ай бұрын
can we get some oceania-centerism
@ezrafriesner83704 ай бұрын
There are indeed some recent attempts at exactly that. My advice is to read some indigenous islander-focused histories, fascinating stuff
@joesalyers4 ай бұрын
Reading comprehension and retention isn't the strongest in certain communities and as an American I apologies for failing education system that can't even get the basics right anymore with some people. Its effecting all of us especially in the under 30 crowd. It seems we are doomed to be ruled by imbeciles and compliant simpletons who must be mollycoddled with every detail explained down to its most basic level before they realize the actual CLEAR meaning of things!!
@bearsausage85994 ай бұрын
Especially if we can’t even define sex or gender anymore, I doubt we’ll have any say when the machines rule everything.
@ADavidJohnson5 ай бұрын
If it were me, I simply would not attempt to clapback on veritas et caritas.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
It was definitely not a good idea.
@jamesbarton19693 ай бұрын
Exaggeration is common in history whether it is Mansa Musa's Hajj, the size of Xerxes' army on the second Persian invasion of Greece or many other examples.
@erdood32355 ай бұрын
17:54 his surname is ben-yehuda, you forgot to say Ben. Ben in this contexts means son of in Hebrew. His surname isn't Yehuda. It's son of Yehuda.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
The "ben" in that place was accidentally deleted in editing. Seconds later I identify him specifically as "Ben-Yehuda" since yes, I know "ben" in Hebrew means "son of", and is part of his name meaning "son of Yehuda".
@erdood32355 ай бұрын
Ok
@glennisholcomb5924 ай бұрын
Now I get why people want to say that Mimosa had slaves which you know me myself I’m not gonna deny that I’m gonna say that in my previous post you run into difficulty trying to prove that he did not describe those same people as servants or anything else fill the position is just playing at semantics I think was really debatable. Here is what were the conditions of those slaves and what were the mechanisms of him acquiring them
@lionelmessisburner73935 ай бұрын
Love this video and great house is obviously a clown, but his followers have been stagnating mainly because he wasn’t posting for a couple months.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Yes I noticed he went quiet but I was surprised to see him actually lose so many followers throughout the year. I don't think this is explained by his brief hiatus.
@lionelmessisburner73935 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas ah, well that’s good then
@Personincrowd3 ай бұрын
I love being a American descendent of west Africa and that doesn't require me to hate anyone else.
@veritasetcaritas3 ай бұрын
Yeah it's not complicated.
@Personincrowd3 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas keep the cool vids coming
@veritasetcaritas3 ай бұрын
@@Personincrowd thank you!
@erdood32355 ай бұрын
So is idi Amin been not a monster bullshit or not?
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
That depends on whether or not you think massacring your own citizens qualifies as being a monster.
@erdood32355 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas i do. But you showed the guy's tweet defending idi as part of the *mild* stuff
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@erdood3235 oh I see what happened. I actually posted it with the introduction "the populist Afrocentrism not taken seriously by mainstream scholarship". It just happened to still be on the screen when I mentioned his earlier, milder tweets.
@erdood32355 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas thanks.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@erdood3235 you're welcome.
@samuel565514 ай бұрын
Great House is very eloquent . I love the use of the academic term " shit " all the while .
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
His research method is equally scholarly.
@rzella80224 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas Haha!
@rubz13905 ай бұрын
I would love to hear your opinions on the KZbin channel "History debunked"
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
1. Right wing. 2. White nationalist adjacent. 3. Frequently racist. 4. Anti-immigration, anti-Muslim, anti-multiculturalism. 5. Socially conservative. 6. Used to be more about history, but these days a lot less about history, and a lot more about cultural war content.
@dg45455 ай бұрын
Lost causer
@Jollofmuncher20005 ай бұрын
Probably one of the worst channels I've ever had the disgrace of coming upon. Not because I disagree with him, but because he's openly racist and blurts out incorrect, harmful things to further an agenda and has the balls to call himself a history channel. It's just another alt right source and lord knows we have too many of those
@tmsphereАй бұрын
The only places on the globe to not having slavery practiced by the locals are places that never saw the agricultural revolution, places that kept the hunter & gatherer mode into modernity. All societies which had a separation of classes eventually had slavery. And most Africa has gone through agriculture about 10,000 years ago, they had class societies of all sorts that practiced the owning and selling of men.
@lionelmessisburner73935 ай бұрын
He’s been as stupid as always lately. These videos are important.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
One of his most recent threads has been critiqued severely by people who are chasing up his sources and discovering how poor they are. I think I might make a video about it.
@lionelmessisburner73935 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas I’d watch
@TheIrishAmish4 ай бұрын
The centrists done care if what they say is correct or not.
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Unfortunately true.
@shivamkumarmishra50515 ай бұрын
The scholarship of this channel is amazing. Was history your major in college or is it your interest?
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Thank you! My bachelor degree majored in classics and history. My Masters is in an unrelated field, information management. However I have also been a university research assistant and ad adjunct lecturer, so I'm familiar with academic searerch methods.
@shivamkumarmishra50515 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas Keep up the good work
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@shivamkumarmishra5051 thank you!
@FretlessChris4 ай бұрын
Note that Dyhana Ziegler (editor of the book) claims a knighthood and prefers to be called "Lady".
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Embarrassing to say the least. “Florida Virtual School CEO says she’s a knighted ‘genius.’ Um … what?” via Scott Maxwell of the Orlando Sentinel - The Sentinel has learned that the school’s new CEO - the woman who is supposed to clean things up - claims she’s not only a knighted dame (something an expert says she isn’t) but also one of the “500 Greatest Geniuses of the 21st Century” (a designation from a bogus and bankrupt organization). Now we’re reading a story about how the new CEO likes to be called “Lady Dhyana Ziegler.” She even had the school print the title on the placard she uses at meetings - though a royalty expert told the Sentinel that the title wasn’t bestowed by the Queen of England, but rather by a “fake” group that usually charges money “for a completely worthless piece of paper.” floridapolitics.com
@misuvittupaa80685 ай бұрын
👍
@aightimmaheadout35734 ай бұрын
💯
@jollygoodfellow39574 ай бұрын
No one should be an Afro or euro or asia or whatever centrist.
@charlieeatherton84224 ай бұрын
It’s nice to point out incompetence. But possibly the ignorant man brings more knowledge to other ignorants that would never seek any knowledge at all.
@Mrax_Taylor5 ай бұрын
I aspects a retraction. What dues your name mean?
@dftp5 ай бұрын
It's just latin for truth and charity.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Truth and charity.
@bagofcatsbagofcats11055 ай бұрын
thruth and love, I'd say
@Mrax_Taylor5 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas Thanks!. Is it a Refruns to something?
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@Mrax_Taylor no it is just expressing the way I aim to present my content.
@MarztheStoic3 ай бұрын
7:17 how would you even going to feed 14k people outside of your Entourage and military personel?
@ryanmassey5864 ай бұрын
These people are low wattage. You'll never convince them of anything..
@wiwysova5 ай бұрын
So much interesting history from Africa, yet people feel the need to lie about it.
@TheLetsRead5 ай бұрын
Poking around some of the sources (not very deeply, mind you) and wow oh wow does Mary Lefkowitz seem like the most insufferable of Classicists. I’m sure there’s veracity in some of the finer grain details of her academic work contesting non-nuanced afrocentrism, but I also can’t lie that I’m more generously predisposed to her critics what with the insufferable way in which Classics nerds refuse to accept the possibility of Mediterranean influences (thus, including Egypt) on proto-Greeks/Greek peoples/etc. Not trying to be contentious outside of noting that it’s a shame her career took such a sharp turn into what feels like the academic equivalent of Terminal Poster Syndrome 😵💫
@TheLetsRead5 ай бұрын
Like, does she hold these perspectives regarding Near Eastern influence on Greece?
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
I think specialists in particular can become very intellectually territorial, and Classicists seem to be prone to this. But in the case of Lefkowitz she has also been repeatedly accused of collaborating in an academic conspiracy to deny African achievemts and falsiify the historical record, and after a few years of that I can understand her being defensive.
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
@@TheLetsRead she believes Greece was inluenced by both Egypt and other Near Eastern sources, as she states here. "Of course there was some Egyptian influence on Greek thought (medicine, science, mathematics), but ancient Near Eastern sources (see below) must also be considered." bmcr.brynmawr.edu/1996/1996.04.19/
@TheLetsRead5 ай бұрын
@@veritasetcaritas Thank you very much for the clarification! Yeah, the (anti-semitic sounding, in particular, to some degree 👀) harassment she’s received is definitely not the criticism I had in mind, and just makes me Feel about the oddball crap which has interfered with good faith (I’m so sorry to default to that term lmao) academic discourse.
@jeffmorin58674 ай бұрын
@@TheLetsRead what's wrong with the phrase "good faith"? abuses of it shouldn't detract from the principle.
@joshuaeffendi4915 ай бұрын
those who do not learn of their past will always be doomed to repeat it
@MrSporkster5 ай бұрын
Based. 😎👌
@veritasetcaritas5 ай бұрын
Thanks mate.
@pigpuke4 ай бұрын
You may consider talking to a lawyer about suing for slander and defamation. It seems to me that his _false_ claims of such are themselves, slanderous and defamatory. Note, I am NOT a lawyer which is why you want to talk to one.
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
It's possible, but really not worth the trouble and expense in my view. At the end of the day he's just a random Twitter user.
@crossedout94614 ай бұрын
As a black man thank you for debunking these people man. Idk how they think this makes us look good
@veritasetcaritas4 ай бұрын
Thank you. Don't worry I know these people are a tiny minority and don't really represent black people at all.
@Dr_Larken4 ай бұрын
0:39 lol, especially when the other person says slaves in Africa we’re treated as family and own property! A slave is a slave, how could someone be your slave yet? Treat them like family and let them on property, yet they were rounded up and sold to Europeans! That says a lot on how someone treats their family! Ugh, let me grab some popcorn. This is going to be interesting!