Why is NO ONE talking about this CAMERA!?

[@nickxc]

The g1 is an awesome camera. I will say, the g2 has a much faster readout speed which does not only help with rolling shutter, but if effects the overall way the camera renders motions. It's one of those things most people would never notice but it does help in giving the G2 a more "cinematic" image. Also the preamps in the G2 for the XLRs are noticeably better. Whether or not that's worth the extra $1,000 plus for the g2 over the g1 is up to the end user. Both cameras are absolutely fantastic.

[@DefiantFilmsTV]

Yeah, i feel like the G2 is definitely the one to go for if you find one within your budget, no doubt. But for the price the G1 goes for nowadays there's not much competition. :)

[@rikkiekhrist6823]

the entire ursa line is completely underrated and overlooked, my favorite sleeper camera being the broadcast G2 which works superbly for cinema. another reason may be because the ursa cameras are supposed to be used with tripods, easyrig, shoulder mount (even though i have seen them on gimbals before im sure most gimbals wouldn't be able to support the weight) and a lot of creators shoot gimbal or handheld and want something small which is why the pocket series gets reviewed to death and gets stacked up against cameras that the ursa should be.

[@DefiantFilmsTV]

Yeah that's a very good point, i haven't looked in to the broadcast version too much but I've heard that from several people. Might be worth checking out. I love shooting handheld with the Ursa, much more than with my Sony for example. You get rid of all the jitter with the weight of the Ursa without having to rely on the artificial feel of ibis.

[@rikkiekhrist6823]

@@DefiantFilmsTV agreed, handheld is lovely on ursas. i use shoulder mount and handheld along with my viewfinder most of the time and its a dream

[@JulesFredericNerestant]

The KZbin algorithm is why. If it's not trendy, talking about it won't get traction.

[@DefiantFilmsTV]

Yeah, most likely!