Why Lancet Drones Highly Effective in Ukraine?

ZALA has shown ongoing efforts to enhance the Lancet drone, as seen in the introduction of upgraded Lancet-3M UAVs, showcasing larger payloads, increased endurance, and transitioned X wings for enhanced aerodynamic properties. Following the undeniable success of the Lancet drone, the ZALA Aero Group is actively engaged in developing and testing a novel variant named the "Product-53." This new drone can be remotely launched from a Multiple-Launch System, such as a quad-packed 4x4 launcher, and boasts a distinctive capability to communicate with other drones, enabling coordinated "Drone Swarm Tactics" to target specific objectives. Alexander Zakharov, the visionary behind the Lancet series, enthusiastically shared updates on the progress of the new variant, mentioning that two hundred thousand units are already prepared, with an additional million in the pipeline.
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv

[@Military-TV]

- US Switchblade 600 vs Russian Lancet 3 kzbin.info/www/bejne/nnako5WOl9yhoJo - 1,000 New Black Hornet Drones to Ukraine kzbin.info/www/bejne/e3yTm3-qacqHj7s - Ukrainian HIMARS Successfully Destroyed The S-400 kzbin.info/www/bejne/l5yZkq2Gh6lrg8k

[@SeaJay_Oceans]

and people laughed and said it wasn't possible, when I explained the networked sky mines, swarm robotics . . . . they are not laughing now.

[@tarmotyyri6733]

Russia is not using these drones because of having lost attack helicopters, but because the drones are cheaper, faster to manufacture & are unmanned, which reduces potential Russian casualties considerably. They are also much harder to spot & shoot down.

[@WinyPouh]

Russian helicopter anti-tank missle Vihr has range of 8 km because a helicopter must see a target and mark it with laser beam. Lancet 3 has rage of 40-70 km. It means Russia use helicopters and lancets for different targets simultaneously. I heven't heard about heavy losses of Ka-52. It might be an Ukrainian propaganda meme.

[@nikolayshopov-shangov6115]

​@@WinyPouhThere is but about 5-6. And Russia can build new.

[@richardv9648]

The concept of cost effectiveness is alien to western military doctrine due privatised nature of its Military industry.

[@nightwatch2686]

@@WinyPouh Oryx is not a credible organization.

[@pierluigidipietro8097]

​@@nightwatch2686afaik, I consider onyx like the infamous "fact checker" that plagued us in the covid era

[@sageo4389]

Russia came late in drone technology but within short time have master it and leading the race in the field.

[@jahloveredeemer4093]

Russians are intelligent people.

[@vaninec]

Russia was first who start making drones

[@user-nh8rw9ek9g]

​@@vaninecno , Russia has bad history with drones even it requested for Israel help about 20 years ago

[@user-qm7ii8fq9e]

Russia mass prod drones more than 50 years

[@vaninec]

@user-nh8rw9ek9g Israel high tech run by RUSSIA They speak Russian LoL

[@user-ew7eg3ot2m]

There are no substantial losses of attack helicopters. It's just that Lancet drones are cheap and effective, that's all.

[@alfe4741]

100 units total(documented) are not substantial ? 1/8 of the total count.

[@user-ew7eg3ot2m]

@@alfe4741 let me guess, documented by oryx, right? You know that oryx documents the same pictures taken from different angles as different vehicles?

[@alfe4741]

@@user-ew7eg3ot2m Well if you have a proof of what you're saying, you can join Oryx team and fix the discrepancy. I'm sure there might be 1 or 2 at the most.

[@user-eh9qh2eu5m]

​@@alfe4741это не верная информация на пальцах посчитать можно потери ударных вертолётов

[@yassine1806]

I like how western media try to show even most successful russian tactics as a failure due to heavy loss or poor technology. I think a 30k drone taking down 5 millions vehicule with the crew who cost maybe more to train is genious

[@FligMatik]

К тому же он не стоит 30 тысяч, цена увеличена как минимум в два раза.

[@AsasinAllamuta]

Это на ваших сми показывают что Россия потеряла очень много людей вертолётов,, нет мой друг это ваша пропаганда хорошо работает с голевудскими сенарями,, если бы Россия захотела за неделю бы не было Украины на карте мира без ядерного оружия, просто русские не бьют по гражнаским инфраструктуром,, русские очень умело воюют против НАТО и Америки,, Россию не можно а невозможно победить

[@antonyakubovskiy1887]

​@@FligMatikони уже добавили таможенный сбор и НДС

[@andyknolls8735]

most of those vehicles cost more than 5 mil, but yea the western news media is carrying water for Ukraine and all the western equipment failures in Ukraine.

[@user-wv6ee7ez8f]

During Ukrainian offensive attempts for more than 2 months not a single attack helicopter was lost on the frontline. At the same time KA-52 helicopters destroyed more than 200 armored vehicles with videos confirming that.

[@angelolitrico9448]

Hi can we get the link?

[@ijutsu2438]

Delusional clown😂

[@donkeymilkers6708]

The Lancet is without a doubt the most impressive weapon I´ve seen used in the Ukro - Russo war so far. Amazing weapon.

[@Booz2020]

Thought Russians only using IRANian Shahed Drones 🤔❔

[@agungprasetyo2665]

@@Booz2020 it's cheap

[@trumpameri1638]

​@@Booz2020Iranian drones are very special price .. Lancet is unstoppable force masterpiece weapon

[@kevindominic5224]

​@@Booz2020shahed is a long range heavy drone with very large payload ( around 90 pound). They are different class of weapons. Those are used to attack large static targets in depth, Lancets are used to attack small mobile targets near frontine. Without lancets, Ukrainian casualties would have been significantly lower. Mines, lancets are responsible for stalling Ukrainian offensive.

[@williamzk9083]

GMLRS had more effect than lancet. Ukraine also operates large numbers of highly effective drones.

[@galoobigboi]

Russia hasn't lost "a lot" of choppers. It's just that these drones are WAY cheaper, VERY efficient in destroying or disabling enemy systems, and can't be grounded by cyber warfare systems.It's just a practical choice and if ukes had similar equipment, they'd do the same.

[@alfe4741]

100 units total is not a small number by any means

[@galoobigboi]

@@alfe4741 Russians can spit those out on a scale that no other manufacturer in Europe or the US can. And I call bullshit on that number, as It certainly doesn't only comprise KA 52's only. For a better reference, you should check just how many choppers the US lost during the Vietnam war. So yeah, a hundred really isn't that much, given the intensity of the conflict and the stakes at play.

[@alfe4741]

@@galoobigboi Yes, 100 helicopters total including transport, reconnaissance, electronic warfare, etc. To your point US lost 5,607 helicopters in Vietnam. Considering that war lasted 20 years, that brings us to 280/year. However, I don't agree that rate of helicopter production in Russia would be significantly higher than that of the US, considering sanctions & loss of acccess to engines from Motor Sich

[@galoobigboi]

@@alfe4741 Russia, according to the latest data from the world bank is now the 5th most powerful economy in the world. They have an OVERabundance of raw materials of all kinds, that they can tap into to produce efficient tech for the battlefield at a fraction of the price we produce ours. The sanctions have never stopped them from importing chips from China. Anyone who thinks they're not is deluded and no amount of sanctions is going to stop that. Take also into account that vietnamese folks NEVER had access to the kind of tech Ukrainians have access to and still were shooting down choppers almost everyday during the conflict.(if you even out the number of downed choppers relative to days of conflict) Anyway you slice it Russia comes out looking good here. I'm not trying to shill here. Then again, it's horrible what's happening and I wish they weren't killing each other. But yeah, Russians are clearly doing much better than the common narrative would have you believe.

[@user-zz6uy5sv1w]

@@alfe4741 n Russia, helicopters have been produced and are still being produced, unlike the industry of the West, Russia focuses on its own forces.

[@akula9713]

It’s amazing what they achieve with those washing machines 😂

[@digitalronin7787]

Damn those washing machines are destroying Nato Wonder Weapons then 🤔

[@henrik_worst_of_sinners]

Don't forget about the showels and breast pumps.

[@canfindyou]

Стираем танки потихоньку

[@user-pd4fs3rn5n]

Вы еще лопаты наши не видели…😏

[@Stormidze]

powered by nutella

[@DilbertMuc]

200.000 lancets in production inventory and another 1 million in the pipeline? They can take out all of NATO tanks and vehicles with that!

[@bagusrestuaji222]

Probably they sacrifice other thing to produce it. Like stoping more modern airplane or helicopter to produce. But man 50 uncontroled drone swarm already terrifying

[@rafasolak6885]

👏Polska pozdrawia. Stop Bandery SS

[@meetthespy3398]

That was a star wars meme from russian authorities =) На самом деле, их изготовлено пара десятков тысяч. Уже неплохо, не так ли?

[@societyreborn33]

​@@bagusrestuaji222talks about creating swarms of 300 geran 2 (much bigger warhead/range than lancet) to overwhelm any air defense systems. Terrifying indeed

[@narowisty]

​@@rafasolak6885ruSSki naZisto z ciebie taki Polak jak z Putina Pop.

[@silvazoldyck366]

Drone tech is seriously challenging the dominance and effectiveness of tanks and armored vehicles.

[@johnmuloch8545]

The days of the battle tank is over

[@silvazoldyck366]

@@johnmuloch8545 It's looking that way. The disparity in cost effectiveness is pretty alarming.

[@titanproductions3628]

@@johnmuloch8545 So what type of war will fhs future hold for us if we don't have tanks and armored vehicles? I guess until they can come out with a laser defense system tanks and armored vehicles are going to be very useless.

[@AlienTech-bk5xl]

@@johnmuloch8545 ya man one fast aerial drone can take out an entire tank.

[@AlienTech-bk5xl]

Ability of small aerial vehicles to carry heavy warheads keep improving

[@researchscholar]

Russia has lost relatively few attack helicopters in Ukraine. In fact the Ka-52 is operating over Zaporizhzhia virtually unchallenged. And, the cost of a Lancet drone was never US$35,000. It's original cost was likely around US$20,000, but its price has plummeted as Russia has significantly scaled up production in spite of improvements -- i.e., the Lancet 3: extended range and larger explosive charge. In fact virtually all Russian weapon systems have experienced a sizeable drop in unit cost production as Russia's defence industrial complex has ramped up production right across the board.

[@KGAnims]

There were 35 confirmed losses of Ka-52, vast majority of them being at start of the war. Each one is around 16,000,000$, so it's quite a hefty amount of money lost.

[@Fulgream]

@@KGAnims на первый этап вообще пришлось больше всего потерь техники. Танки тоже со временем научились использовать в новой реальности. Не колоннами, а увешанных Динамической защитой и решетками от fpv

[@user-fp3cf5vs7m]

@@KGAnims Confirmed by whom? Source - Ukrainian media, you can't even imagine the level of lies in Ukrainian resources - everything is based on lies! Even their spokesmen are talking about it: "If we tell the truth-our country will simply collapse" Arestovich In Russia they lie, in the USA they lie, but in Ukraine it has become exactly "Black is white and white is black" everything is twisted, everything is twisted - that's how their elite tries to survive. there is zero constructive there

[@TheMrakic]

indeed, but you know Russians are fighting with shovels and using chips from washing machines :D :D :D

[@robertagowski9492]

@@KGAnims 🤣Albo mniej słońca kolego. Albo mniej ukro propagandy , która bije wszelkie granice absurdu 😅

[@DedHobbit]

The Lancet is the Kalashnikov of the 21st century. I think in 20-30 years Lancets will be in all conflicts just as there is a Kalashnikov assault rifle everywhere now

[@kanakubatov5508]

With the current rate of technology development, in a couple of years there will be swarm drones with artificial intelligence even among the pirates of Somalia and the Berbers in Africa ...

[@kir2317]

@@kanakubatov5508 but so far America does not have :)))

[@user-gt8td2ly1n]

через 10 лет дроны станут не нужны ..потому что закончатся танки ..

[@vkham9944]

The (upgraded version) KA-52's are the best helicopters. Logistics and pilots are main reason to use very cost effective drones against enemies. 💥

[@AlexanderTch]

Previous version was not bad either.

[@m_zbrv3967]

Helicopter launched lanced?

[@andyz7711]

But the anti-tank missle which they use probably costs around the same as lancet... In larger conflict they can be more effective due to their range.

[@AlbionTVLondon]

Where are the mentioned "lost helicopters". We don't see any lost helicopters. We do see a lot of lost Leopards and Bradleys - that's for sure. And that's thanks to both Russian helicopters and drones.

[@overdrivelzma.9219]

There is a video of a Russian tank crashing into a column of Ukrainian armored vehicles destroying 2 tanks and 6 MRAP Maxxpro , what courage to perform that feat.

[@royalgunsup25reee90]

Where's the vid of that

[@stevewapner9061]

Both sides helicopters have been largely neutralized by air defense, tho Russia’s Ka 52s are getting back into action firing from within Russian held territory at attacking vehicles.

[@michaelp8838]

​@@royalgunsup25reee90Hindustan time's

[@waliza001]

They lost around 40. But in last year they manufactured 32 new ones.

[@coshyno]

A drone that costs 30 000$ destroying Ukrainian tanks that cost well over 1 millions$, to me, that is a pretty cost effective way of demilitarizing Ukraine, or NATO I should say !

[@waliza001]

closer to 10 000.

[@djtrip5611]

@@waliza001нет. Стоимость ланцета около 30000$ около 3000000₽

[@djtrip5611]

@@waliza001стоимость леопарда в десятки раз больше. Ланцету не нужно взрывать танк полностью,достаточно нанести повреждения не совместимые с дальнейшим движением. Больше уже в условиях боя ничего будет не сделать. Машину придется покинуть. А уже потом будет работать артиллерия. Все это осуществляется при втором беспилотнике который контролирует происходящее

[@waliza001]

@@djtrip5611 Я знаю это :)

[@jeniat2206]

If you are a Russian schizophrenic, then of course the Russian Federation is at war with NATO.

[@mohamedayman5666]

The most advanced kamikaze drone right now in the world I hope my country Egypt gets it

[@MrAlexStoryteller]

Egypt-Russia relations are stronger than earlier. Egypt's president is a great man

[@tyrtrolas]

For what? you're not in a war rn

[@MrAlexStoryteller]

@@tyrtrolas What's RN? Royal Navy?

[@mohamedayman5666]

@@tyrtrolas We are not in war But this drone is a game changer 😁

[@tyrtrolas]

@@MrAlexStoryteller it means right now

[@Serg_M]

According to the results of July 2023, 134 episodes of strikes with "Lancets" against the AFU targets were published. • The record of May 2023 (62 strokes) has been more than doubled. • An increase in the number of strikes by 22.3 times compared to the same period in 2022. • The number of strikes in July 2023 is more than in the whole of 2022 (lostarmor)

[@moratheexplorer5791]

Fly shovel is really effective.

[@Sl2ven]

Друг откуда пошло это Лопата и Стиральные Машины? Это в новостях запада так говорят что Россия воюет ими?

[@galactuscausandoimpactus9521]

@@Sl2ven sim, e ainda tem a história das cabras e abelhas que atacaram os soldados russos e os derrotaram no campo de batalha 😂😂 a imprensa ocidental já perdeu a noção do ridículo 😂😂😂

[@user-xx5xz5gh8e]

"To all German units and divisions! Says the representative of the Supreme Soviet Command, Marshal Zhukov. Our only condition is unconditional surrender. Stop fire on both sides in fifteen minutes. We will take prisoners at the Brandenburg Gate. We guarantee life for everyone. Place firearms on the other side of the gate. Officers are allowed to keep edged weapons with them." May 1945

[@canfindyou]

В точку

[@johnnywaffen4581]

after 80,000 killed and 300,000 wounded yeah nice job 😂

[@ionbased5117]

​@@johnnywaffen4581If we are ready to fight, then we are ready to die

[@atifshahzad4728]

Oh Yes. Soviet Russia is coming back in 2023.

[@Nolefan1966]

I like the way they said the loss of Russian attack helicopters when only one has been shot down the last six months by the ukrainians😂😂😂😂😂

[@lovealways2609]

ya ~ KA-52's have destroyed all ukrina positions

[@melvinmelvin8577]

Y’all must be only reading Russia news’s lol because it’s videos out! Y’all so funny

[@WinyPouh]

@@melvinmelvin8577 we're all watching Russian Telegram channels of war reporters. There are a lot of Ukrainian side videos there. So you cannot blame on us that we do not know the uncomfortable truth. But we know that Ukrainian and Western propaganda lie to such great extent that our own state propaganda sounds like truth compared to theirs.

[@Nolefan1966]

@melvinmelvin8577 I watched DPA everyday and that is definitely not a Russian Channel. You need to stop watching them Ukrainian channel that have them video games and pass them off as real videos and people praise Ukraine

[@melvinmelvin8577]

@@Nolefan1966 why Russia brings gn old tanks out if they not getting wrecked lol

[@impersonal6650]

7:11 The vehicles' graveyard looks wild. So many Bradleys and Leopards destroyed.

[@1Q84-00]

Russian flying shovels are the most precise shovels in the world😊

[@EcoZen24]

Необходимо сделать лансет 4 с кассетной боевой частью для уничтожения наступающей пехоты

[@user-sv4ou5bz7m]

Насколько я знаю, уже есть разные модификации - фугасная, кумулятивная и термобарическая. Они будут очень быстро развиваться и совершенствоваться.

[@Iv4Bez]

нифигасе вы тут. а где вы про них информацию узнаете и что все эти слова значат...

[@RustedCroaker]

Кассеты в дроне весом 12 кг? На мух чтоль охотиться? Все, что не может поднять больше 50 кг загружать кассетами бессмысленно.

[@EcoZen24]

@@RustedCroaker кто сказал что дрон должен быть 12кг? Я сказал сделать другой лансет даже 1 и 3 разные по весу что за тупая логика

[@1mrzealot1]

​@@user-sv4ou5bz7mкассетную еще бы сделали

[@danielconquer909]

Why use a multimillion dollar helicopter when a sub 40k munition does the job more effectively

[@overdrivelzma.9219]

The zala lancet can not destroy the Leopard 2A6 tanks its armor is very thick can only immobilize them

[@Stringfellow-xo6do]

@@overdrivelzma.9219 An immobilized tank is just as bad as destroyed. It cant move, it cant be used and it will cost time and money to recover and repair.

[@reconcordoba8096]

@@overdrivelzma.9219 An inmobilized tank is a destroyed tank. Once you know the tank can't move on, the artillery will strike that position to destroy it totally.

[@NIB2307]

A helicopter is a multipurpose weapon. It can work at night and has multiple types of weapons against tanks, infantry, fortification, and enemy's aviation.

[@MichailKravchenko]

@@overdrivelzma.9219 Обездвиженный танк - лёгкая цель для арты + приманка для тех, кто захочет его забрать и попадёт уже под скорректированный огонь артиллерии на пристрелянном месте.

[@pierluigidipietro8097]

The design of these drones are more and more similar to star wars design

[@c.r.e.a.z]

Atomic hearts

[@vadimivanov983]

Посмотрели фильм терминатор сделали терминатора , посмотрели звёздные войны сделали ланцет 😀🤣

[@user-xo5tq9op5e]

А что будет если мы русские сделаем эту хреновину в обратной стреловидностью крыла?)))) У американцев во всех фильмах где инопланетяне захватывают землю все корабли имеют обратную стреловидность крыльев как у самолёта су47 беркут. В общем нагоним жути на янки)))

[@nzt489]

так военно-космические силы называется в РФ структура. Да и удары из космоса это реальность.

[@nm2000]

The Lancet is probably the best drone of its class at the moment. I wonder what happened to these US Switchblade drones that were so higher regarded?

[@humpreykalombe4036]

They are just a fancy name only.

[@Vvkiurv]

GPS не работает по причине воздействия РЭБ, соответственно Switch Blade не работает тоже!

[@user-uz1lc7kt9t]

All American weapons are obsolete! Even those samples of American weapons that are still under development are outdated shit!

[@mineralwater6736]

you know what the Nato should invade Russia and let's see who hat the best weapons and technology. agree?

[@user-mi2ys3vz4e]

@@mineralwater6736 Согласен. Только пускай НАТО проконсультируются у шведского короля Карла 12, императора Франции Наполеона Бонапарта и фюрера 3-го рейха Адольфа Гитлера.

[@hydrohasspoken6227]

The design of the first version is Dope as fuck.

[@agentepolaris4914]

Yep, but I like the newer model much more

[@NathansHVAC]

It is scarey looking on purpose.

[@MM-tt3np]

When will we see a R/C version for hobbyists? :)

[@user-mc7ez6lm4x]

Does it look like a Dragonfly spaceship from "Lexx"?

[@wolfswinkel8906]

Looks like a Jedi X-wing 😊

[@Lancetdrone]

This week, the milestone of 500 attacks by lancet drone was crossed.

[@user-ee8uu3zp3h]

😳😨

[@Desire123ification]

Drones: the future of warfare!

[@poulhenningsrensen3305]

Jep - Until a sophisticated anti drones systems render them obsolete and the circle of development begins again...

[@vaninec]

Future in "Interference Army"

[@larsnystrom6698]

@poulhenningsrensen3305 When there are cheap anti-drone drones, it moves from tech into manufacturing capability. It becomes an economic war. The one who can produce the most cheap drones win. This is a warning to the USA: don't start a war with China. You won't keep up in manufacturing capacity.

[@klaabu99]

u need to send out loads of them to be effective against modern armour ... i mean with proper protection... they need to test it on merkavas ...

[@IncognitoUnknown-fc2tu]

Thanks, Captain

[@jimcroft3633]

The ukrainains have not downed a Russians helicopter since the offensive began in early June.

[@user-xk9jw6gh2j]

Всему виной этого то что ка 52 начал использовать ракету вихрь у которого дальность 12 км

[@sosovlasov4262]

Lancet is Kalashnikov of our days.

[@Mkeric1971]

100 successful strikes?! i would say a lot more

[@klaabu99]

a bit over 100 may be right number ... out of thousands they used ... there are so dew videos about these hits ... some videos are even multiple hits on same target ... then add same hits but videos made by different drones

[@Mkeric1971]

@@klaabu99 dude there are 20 to 30 videos daily .i watch both sides and lancets are used successfully on daily basis. Especially since beginning of june and ukranian offensive they are all over the place

[@user-fp3cf5vs7m]

@@klaabu99 There are many more, many more.. I think it's getting closer to 500 hits. Lately, they have been playing the role of a finisher on the battlefield. A caterpillar flies off the tank and a lancet flies to finish off, but they also smashed a lot of artillery. Every day, from 5 videos, telegram channels are definitely thrown out.

[@genem895]

Production of Lanset drones is at 40000 per month, yes, 40k

[@user-ee8uu3zp3h]

😨😳😰

[@dayandknight.]

God bless Russia.

[@user-mc7ez6lm4x]

Alexander Zaharov,stay safe! In fact Lancet is not a weapon to terrorize infantry or buildings, so it is not used against civilians. No one will spend $35000 to commit a simple act of terror, this UAV is pure defensive weapon, only suitable to destroy costlier weapons! As a Russian I am proud. As americans say: God created us equal and col.Colt made this equality into a reality. Zaharov does something similar by negating the privilege of the rich armies over the poorer states armies! Zaharov, banzai!

[@zachariasobenauf1895]

interesting approach - this cheap assassin may be be nightmare used by terrorists/freedom-fighters

[@respekted]

@@zachariasobenauf1895 This looks too sophisticated to proliferate in the hands of the typical cartel or paramilitary. There are plenty of NATO weap/ns in the black market I'm sure.

[@zachariasobenauf1895]

@@respekted agreed - not the pro-military versions - but the lancet-1-class or the shaheds are a really cheap weapons which may be operated with low-tech controls on "people" inside stationary - hitting them on entering or leaving ... not to mention the domestic drones with improvised handgrenades .... the 2-dimesional protection on gated communities may stand naked ... wasn´t Yemen attacking saudi-arabia with cheap homemade drones ? it may alter the way of the privileged - on a scale the longbow the colt or the first machine-guns had the obama drone-killing may get a payback by those who lived under the death from above -and no "terrorist" with wahtever insane agenda had to expose himself anymore

[@Lancetdrone]

There will be more and more lancets. In July, twice as many attacks have already been recorded as in June.

[@hermionefinnigan7469]

Omg, this ZALA Lancet-3 kamikaze drone is like a flying “Terminator”!

[@ilovehihats]

Props to Zala group, what an interesting piece of engineering, cheap yet extremely effective as per russian tradition.

[@YaHussain3_1_3]

Job well done Rooskies. Keep going.

[@nzt489]

Палестина?

[@Aetila]

It's cheap, environment-friendly...and deadly. 🙂

[@Iv4Bez]

Lol really. Tanks using diesel, no tanks - no diesel.

[@nzt489]

только стоимость копья 6000-9000

[@justarandomname420]

This is what one can do with some shovels and washing machine chips.

[@NathansHVAC]

For some reason russia doesn't want to be owned by wall street.

[@vladm5920]

We’re running out of washing machines 😢 Using stolen Ukrainian microwaves and toasters now ✊

[@renedecima6644]

Bravo Rusia 🇷🇺. Lo mejor en tecnología. Excelente 👍🇦🇷

[@njkt9o]

Gracies Che! Ganaremos pronto

[@renedecima6644]

@@njkt9o 👌❤️

[@herberthall8082]

This is the greatest factor to the increased roasting of marshmallows. There is nothing tastier then roasting marshmallows on a burning German Leopard Tank. The fires from such burning Ukraine armour will greatly increase the need for additional marshmallow production and the growth of marshmallow companies.

[@nawfelislam20]

"Millions are in the Pipeline" 🔥🔥🔥

[@nerinine]

Russians love to invent and build new things.

[@enivaldopantojateles8770]

O lancet é uma arma temível e formidável virou o jogo pra Rússia

[@user-go8vt9lp7i]

Virou o jogo? Ucrânia nunca chegou perto nem de empatar esse "jogo" kkk

[@enivaldopantojateles8770]

@@user-go8vt9lp7i verdade 👍

[@abrarzarif5061]

Range of an Excalibur Ability to top attack as Javelin Downside : less warhead for tanks but enough to knock out spg, ifv, apc But Russian operators are now target to disable or immobilize tanks which ended up by artillery or fpv

[@MrZombiekiller23]

I dont think its too little of a warhead for tanks, it has taken out plenty of soviet tanks and even a t80BVM. And as seen in the video and others, it has disabled and penetrated even Leopards

[@swiftusmaximus5651]

The warhead still usually puts the Tank out of commission but usually can be repaired if the ammo magazine doesnt go off and its pulled back behind the lines and to a Repair facility.

[@boocomban]

Lancet 1 does moderate damage to tanks but Lancet 3 have better range and more penetration capability that allow to destroy tank or cause critical damage make it inoperatable.

[@valiantone6937]

Well new types are being produced with 10kg warhead soon to be used

[@fatgirlboy9341]

@@MrZombiekiller23only if they hit the rear of the torret where the ammo are kept inside

[@user-js8lu6od9t]

Mille BRAVOS vous TROUVEZ TOUJOURS des SOLUTIONS vous ne BAISSEZ JAMAIS les BRAS . Vous êtes FORMIDABLES

[@solehbandung5974]

Lancet and leopard tank is "best friend"😂

[@pauls3357]

You're wrong. They are lovers & have a penetration so often :)

[@hugh8329]

The Lancet is the 'poster boy' of this war.

[@emilioesdabes7086]

Lancet Drones continue taking names. Abrams and Challenger Tanks are missing out… Send those “ game changers” to the frontlines ASAP.

[@oppaceh7394]

havent seen challenger 2 "the British tank that's never been destroyed yet" on the front yet. dont want the same fate as leo2😂

[@canfindyou]

Давайте уже всех сюда, что у вас там осталось

[@agungprasetyo2665]

Waiting for the product 53 lancet debut.

[@ilovehihats]

Yeah, I'm hyped

[@RustedCroaker]

Can't wait to see them in action!

[@mirekslechta7161]

Russia´s guns are always very effective . We can see what USA´s weap*ns are capable of in counterofensive in Ukraine :) The only things which are remarkable regarding american weap*ns are the PRICE and the SPEED in which they are being wiped out...

[@usernwn7qe]

They seem to do some damage but they actually don´t take out the target.

[@mirekslechta7161]

@@usernwn7qe Russia needs to do the damage to those extreemly expensive machines without spending a fortune... That is the art of war.

[@klaabu99]

u get it wrong ... russia tried with mass take ukraine: first tanks and armor they failed ... then artillery and infantry also failed ... now they try with drones ... why u think there is so few videos of drone hits if russia have produced so big number of drones(every hit does not destroy vechicle)

[@usernwn7qe]

@@klaabu99 "Every hit does not destroy vehicle" well ask a T72 crew. (in case they´re alive)

[@radiozvrk6784]

@@klaabu99 so you think they destroyed only mentioned vehicles?

[@jamesgornall5731]

Well, dobt be surprised when an opponent turns your tactics against you

[@jirivrana3623]

US military complex have no capacity to raise rapidly production. Its build to provide small numbers of expensive and overengeenered things which need to much manhours to be build. Russia military complex is build with idea of huge expansion in the time of war and they now used it and their toys are made to be simple and easy to build like AK47.

[@StanislawKarbowski13]

The next lancet model will be in the form of a Ukrainian trident. As they say , they are salom and musalom

[@win5tonh968]

Lancet 53 will come in swarms.

[@klaabu99]

on year 2090?

[@ChristianGustafson]

@@klaabu99Through QA, waiting for first use. They will shock the world.

[@overdrivelzma.9219]

They say the new zala Lancet product 53 drone can be launched from helicopters such as the Kamov 52 or the Mi 8.

[@Iv4Bez]

@@overdrivelzma.9219 I mean that is more interesting is making them as fast as helicopters and then using it as an anti-rocket defence system lol

[@evilleader1991]

This thing is wrecking havoc on Ukrainian battlefield! I see multiple Lancet hits every single day!!!

[@user-um6dd8rl2t]

Lantset is the 'game changer' for sure. But, why they don't add bigger warhead on them? 2-3 more kilos at least? Since some of the targets are just damaged. Why they use Shahed kamikaze drones as cruise missiles only and not striking targets like Leopard 2? If they correct those errors there is not point of sending more tanks and vehicles to Ukraine from NATO

[@overdrivelzma.9219]

They have enough power to destroy MRAP Maxxpro , IFV Bradley m2a2 tanks T 64, M 109, polish Krab, M 777 only lacked more power to destroy the Leopard 2A6 and Challenger II.

[@DonVetto-vx9dd]

Shahed/Geran-2 really is a cruise missile, not anti tank missile. It doesn't even have camera or optic sensor.

[@alexsalemo9137]

Never doubt what Slavic Russians able to do when they are in dangerous, I’m going to sure something to you, this war give Russian military designer views for the future, next generation of Russian kamikaze drones will be very dangerous and game changer.

[@JesterEric]

Lancet 3 has a 3kg warhead

[@MrAlexStoryteller]

One reason: cost-effectiveness (no overkilling). Besides, armored vehicles repairs are so expensive that Germany withdrew from running its repair stations in Poland. Hehe, German-Polish ties are strained as a result. Damaging the vehicles also stresses the resources of Ukraine, because they have to go and get them on the field - and what awais them there....

[@ignacj]

In animated videos the drone is blowing up tanks and trucks. In the actual footage, it damages the vehicle - not a single one brewed up like Russian tanks do when hit by FPVs. Leopard in question had it's tracks damaged, it was disabled, not destroyed.

[@servantofchrist2483]

Lancet is new Ak 47 of Russia 🇷🇺✝️🇷🇺 God bless Putin and Russia

[@starikanleks3198]

👉☦🙄

[@jeniat2206]

Peaceful land to you, above your head.

[@martinjanecek4950]

Glory to Russia!

[@jeniat2206]

And you are the home of your favorite Russians. schizophrenics.

[@mineralwater6736]

smrt rusiji

[@user-uh9nf9mi1t]

И всё-таки боевую часть не мешало бы увеличить !.....

[@troysweeney8432]

Russia is on its 3rd generation in 1 year. Bigger, faster, and cheaper ones are coming

[@troysweeney8432]

And don’t forget, it’s not the size of the warhead but the type. The X wings are using penetrating darts to bypass the thick nato armor. These small darts can disable the armored vehicles or cause ammunition detonations.

[@user-uh9nf9mi1t]

​@@troysweeney8432Детонация бывает редко , экипаж в большинстве случаев остаётся жив а это плохо !....

[@user-wn1ms2pz2n]

НАТО передало Украине снаряды с объединенным ураном А если сделают точно такой же ланцет?😂😂😂

[@AugustSchroif]

@@user-wn1ms2pz2nпрочитай, что такое БОПС, а потом уже пиши глупости.

[@user-ur2mq7hf1d]

The Russian Lancet drone destroyed the American Avenger, German Gepard, British Stormer and Spanish Spade systems. Indeed, the Lancet is a Russian legend like the Kalashnikov rifle

[@ijutsu2438]

Kalashnikov is a stolen german rifle, clown😂

[@wolfschanze.]

Big Russia ! Victory for you ! ❤👍✌🇮🇹🇷🇺

[@user-kx8xk2lc7s]

Z ❤️🇷🇺

[@mineralwater6736]

smrt rusiji

[@AlexanderSeven]

These drones made of shovels and washing machines parts are surprisingly effective.

[@chingychan6931]

俄罗斯必胜👍

[@troysweeney8432]

They are highly effective because they are cheap, can be produced rapidly and are easy to use unlike nato equipment. Remember, the X wings are piloted by the good guys.

[@globalcitizen8321]

The X Wing was much more expensive than the Tie Fighter. So, actually, the Rebellion (the good guys), used a more complicated system than the Empire...

[@YaMomsOyster]

God is on the “good guys” side (aka Russia)

[@troysweeney8432]

@@globalcitizen8321 it was a joke…

[@alexandarvoncarsteinzarovi3723]

They have always been the bad guys, just ask any Pole, Fin or Romanian also there is no God, if there was a God why did he not kill Hitler, Stalin Marx, Lenin, Mussolini, Jesus, Abraham, Mohamend and the idiot Gavrilo Princip who shot Arch Duke Ferdinand, as babies,

[@globalcitizen8321]

@@troysweeney8432 I know... I wasn't talking seriously either... After all, Star Wars is just a story...

[@alfatar6183]

T 84 is not a Soviet tank - T 84 is a tank produced in Poland, Romania, Yugoslavia and Ukraine under license of the Soviet T 80! 🥸

[@FlyingNazgul-wm1dv]

I'm steadily becoming a lancet fanboy Like an explosive scalpel, the last second change of course they can do is crazy

[@masadjie79]

Harga murah,efisien,sulit dideteksi,berdaya ledak tinggi & saat ini area tempur ada di ruang terbuka,maka lebih mudah bagi lancet utk mencari mangsa

[@captwillard3346]

Do a video about the entire concept of IFV's being obsolete. Top it off with hours of footage of burning Bradleys.

[@overdrivelzma.9219]

Or upload the video of Bradleys cemetery in Ukraine.

[@user-bb5up7qk4e]

Bradley - deadly💀💀💀

[@craig4867]

WANTED! Leopard tank drivers! Lousy work conditions! Early retirement!

[@scpgaming-452]

lancet destroy leopard-2 : 1 lancet damaged ❎ 2 lancet finally burn ✅

[@NathansHVAC]

Pay is $30k per year from US tax dollars.

[@overdrivelzma.9219]

There are many leopards that were attacked in small trenches and ditches the Leopard is too heavy for the territory of the dombas so the Soviet tanks are medium weight.

[@stevefreeland9255]

I prepose a swift, orderly move away from caling weapons like these kamikaze drones. That epithet has a particular context as a crewed weapon in the Pacfic in WWII. Weapons like the Lancet are better called drone munitions. There are many other possibilities: Uncrewed Guided Weapons; Flying self-destructing Drone Munition, uncrewed combat aerial vehicle (UCAV), etc.

[@gflvnfp2873]

They are called Loitering Munitions

[@manserizawa2327]

But the names you gave are lame

[@WinyPouh]

One way drones

[@djinn666]

We already have a term for unmanned, guided munitions with its own independent propulsion: missiles. The Lancet is a cheap and slow-flying missile.

[@NathansHVAC]

Woke they/them army needs safe space.

[@tadzdgreat]

Substanial helicopter losses? Lol. Alligators are flying all over the frontlines 😂😂😂

[@valbrend9819]

Seeing this thousand of them flying all at once would be a nightmare for armoured vehicles

[@novalhikmat9042]

Lancet Go Green! Save the environment

[@bagusrestuaji222]

At 2020 Turkey was the most experienced on drone technology but it was strike drone that has weakness as much as small rotor plane. switch blade was good but that thing purpose only to targeted light vehicle and foot soldier mainly consist of small fragmentation explosives.. but Lancet basically was flying TOW missile on drone platform

[@selcukcilek555]

Yes but if a Turkish Anka or Bayraktar strikes with it's missiles any tank is beyond repair condition.

[@arimoff]

Turkey most experienced on drone technology? 😂😂. Turkey doesn't produce innovative technology, never did and never will. A drone is not halva. Turkey's technology comes from nato

[@selcukcilek555]

@@arimoff You need to be a consultant to governments of 28 countries. 25 having the Turkish drones and 3 non declared yet. They seem not to know what you know. If "Turkey's technology comes from nato" then why do NATO countries like Poland buy from Turkiye? And why do other NATO countries don't manufacture them? Do you have any clue of how many Chinese and Turkish electronics is within the drones and that Aselsan makes the cameras because "NATO Ally" Canada sanctioned exports of the previous Canadian camera producer?. You made yourself just laughable.

[@williambrown1480]

Very informative thanks you

[@samfernando5389]

Bravo Russia. Amazing capabilities !

[@mocnijogurt]

133 registered hits with lancet just in July....

[@TsarOfRuss]

Lol.... where is Turkish Bayraktar drones ???? i thought you guys were running your mouth about it not so long ago ! where is the "GAME CHANGER" now???

[@larsnystrom6698]

@tsar5501 The game changed... again! The problem with them was that they were expensive enough to use missiles against them. I think everyone now realizes that using expensive things against cheap things is a bad business.

[@AugustSchroif]

Ukraine ran out of Bayraktars in spring of the last year.

[@davhot4107]

8:33 that drone looks cute like a little puppy 😊🐶

[@Kayzef2003]

What happened to the US switchblades sent to Ukraine? They went the way of the Bayrakters, JDAMs and HARM missiles pretty quickly... BASICALLY Russian Electronic warfare made them useless.

[@jetfighter200]

ironic that a lancet just smacked today an IRIS-T Launcher

[@camilojosecorreiadepina5673]

Muitos parabéns por este canal de notícias, faz muita falta ter informação real e não notícias falsas.

[@jaimedu5350]

I really love that LANCET Drone!

[@user-gy2xk4ot8f]

The Lancet drone was first presented at the Army 2016 Forum at the Patriot Convention and Exhibition Center.

[@tzeentch8281]

Ah yes, the Shovel drones....

[@NathansHVAC]

Built in prisons

[@kaweesiivan9610]

Lancet is a pain in the a** of a tank 😢

[@davidphillips8674]

The triple efp warhead doesn’t hurt

[@MISSIONRIDERMOTOVLOG]

Impressive.

[@Dek4DenZ]

the real game changer

[@CarlWheatley-wi2cl]

Total 1.2 million Product-33 drones in the pipeline. Next gen drone warfare. Might as well take pot shots at them with AK's for all the good it will do. Holy hell

[@user-fp3cf5vs7m]

Yes, there are no such figures .. Where do you get about a million drones from? I watched the report, the guys collect it manually, without a conveyor. This means that there can be no such volumes, for the war they will print in general no more than 50k, and there already for export

[@yzyz7779]

👍👍👍 nice work, Alhamdulillah,bagus kalau lancet ini boleh ditembak dari kapal selam,dan terbang lebih jauh di laut.

[@borisgrejcha7263]

now Russia is making its own nuclear kamikaze drones

[@kanakubatov5508]

a swarm of nuclear kamikaze drones with AI... and deliver them to the African rebels... then against the fleet of the US, Japan, Korea in the South China Sea...

[@RustedCroaker]

They are called ICBMs

[@sonyx5332]

God bless these drones and Iranian drones. 😁🍻👍🏼

[@shivamRudram]

Can anyone explain the aerodynamics of X shape of wings

[@user-nn8bt2ch2w]

Один нормальный комментарий👍😂

[@Iv4Bez]

not a clue. But looking cool

[@Feadeaf]

Just simple. better aerodynamics, stability in flight, maneuverability. the best aerodynamic properties allow you to save energy (charge) of batteries.

[@pipertoniy]

is leopard has any damage from lancet? lancet has a little weight of exploding thing.

[@KarlsonUfa]

your leopards have been in the zoo for a long time, fascist

[@palerewin]

I dont see how the lancet can be countered from the opponent. Its gonna take a long time to find that out