Why Manufactures Make 18ft Guitar Cables

PRS Cables
imp.i114863.net/VMvb6 imp.i114863.net/VMvb6
Hosa 18 ft cable ( A lot less money)
amzn.to/2YVPv3q
The Zoom H5 recorder I used
imp.i114863.net/qaGrY imp.i114863.net/qaGrY
PRS John Mayer guitar used in this video
imp.i114863.net/gxeAg imp.i114863.net/gxeAg
The Fender 68 RI Princeton I used in the video
imp.i114863.net/KMYaN imp.i114863.net/KMYaN
Boss TU-3 Tuner Pedal I sued in this video
imp.i114863.net/zo5e0 imp.i114863.net/zo5e0
JHS Buffer pedal
imp.i114863.net/0vMxO imp.i114863.net/0vMxO
LPD buffer pedal
reverb.com/marketplace?query=...
Here are some other cool products from a dealer I trust and buy from online
imp.i114863.net/c/2224555/791...

[@way2sh0rt07grad]

“So how do you get your unique tone?” “ everyone else uses an 18’ cable, i use a 19’ cable” .....🤯...🤦🏻‍♂️

[@Merkaba954]

Because it's 5 meters? That was a wild guess at the beginning of the video

[@HappyBeezerStudios]

Actually closer to 5.5m, but good guess. Now if you see 6ft cables, that's pretty much 1.8m, a common length.

[@nwimpney]

It also depends a lot on the impedance of the pickups, and the resistance of the pots. A lower impedance source is going to be less affected. An extreme example would be an active pickup, which shouldn't be audibly affected by long cables.

[@ViviSectia]

There's such a slight difference, it's hard to tell if I'm only hearing it because I expect to hear it or if it's just due to the slight differences in playing each time.

[@NoOne-ye5jf]

Yeah, It's nothing that can't be fixed by turning up the highs in the amp EQ

[@TR-zf6io]

I could definitely hear it in the blind test... but only because I was explicitly listening for it. If you played me the two clips, with no context, I may not have been able to tell the difference as easily. Or, I suspect I might have heard a slight difference, but couldn't tell you what it was.

[@mikee6666]

@@NoOne-ye5jf An EQ sure helps, but doesn't quite fix it in the strictest sense. If you're losing the highs (which is what happens with cable capacitance), then you can't turn up what you don't have. A buffered pedal early in the chain really is the better option so you don't lose those highs in the first place. (But of course that then opens up the issue of buffered pedals colouring the tone, which is a whole other kettle of fish.)

[@crazeyjoe]

@@NoOne-ye5jf In certain cases, increasing the treble frequencies to compensate for frequency degradation will increase inherent noise.

[@RC32Smiths01]

Dang I have a new founding and perspective on these! Really interesting insight, especially as one who owns a lot!

[@RandyFricke]

My buffer is an '80s Japanese Script BOSS CS-2. I also dated a chick named Buffer once too. I found out right away how she got that nick name. And that's all I have to say about that.

[@tteezzrreell]

cable length so real even he sounded different when he said "18 foot prs cable" compared to the much more dulled out and lower frequency "and 25 foot cable" at 2:15 lmfao

[@royfifer4536]

Thank you for the vids! Always learn SOMETHING I didn't know before!

[@zumazmusic]

"I think he meant with his ear" Good one Phil!

[@jerrymckenzie6205]

There is a small difference between the 18' and the 25' cable, but not enough to matter. If you are on a big stage running 50' or more of cable then yeah, but all those guys run a buffer.

[@cracker182]

you are so knowledgeable about equipment. it blows my mind.

[@jrzzl4170]

I love learning new stuff like this. Always wondered about this but forget to look up after I leave the shop. Thank you for these!!!

[@RoySmithVideo]

Guitars with active electronics do not have any of these issues because the electronics present a very low impedance output signal - just like pedals. The run from the pedalboard to the amp should not be considered in the "length to the amp" calculation because nearly all modern pedals provide a low impedance output that isn't subject to the loss of a passive cable. So you can eliminate half of the problem by using a pedalboard (which most guys already do these days) and all of the problem by using a guitar with active electronics (heresy to many purists, I know).

[@EpicStuffMan1000]

or a pedal with a buffer :)

[@LandsOfDespair]

Hello! So, basically.. If I'm playing on active EMGs and use for example a coiled cable (which cuts highs) - it will be the same as playing through just plain shorter straight cable?

[@The-11]

I've always wondered what was up w/ them making weird lengths of cable. You can hear a difference. Thanks Phil!

[@ryanwilson5936]

Man, that’s subtle! But it’s there for sure.

[@sirena7116]

I always wondered why that length was the maximum, and now I know. Thanks!

[@nuberiffic]

I feel like this is the difference between making a lasagne with 3 cloves of garlic vs 3.05 cloves of garlic. The difference in tone is far less than what you'd get just by picking slightly harder.

[@joshuafreedman7703]

nuberiffic 😜😜😜😆😆😆

[@stephenmarksberry538]

I knew there was a loss of high end on my guitars,however slight,but changed with the 2 different amp rigs I to play through,a Fender Pro Reverb & a British style head. The cables are not the same length and I am thinking ,your explanation has to be the reason why! Shimmering highs are what I love about tube amps and though old I am , highs still rock my world.You're brilliant and the finest kind , thanks Phil.

[@eviljeniusdesign]

I definitely heard the difference, though my brain wanted to interpret the higher capacitance examples as slightly "warmer". Great job on the video, by the way. Your production quality has greatly improved!

[@johnfarmingdale]

I wish you would of added a 10ft or less in the mix, but great video as always. Rock on!

[@CoolDaysEnd]

Great video and explanation! I never knew that the Boss tuner was a buffer pedal. Thanks!!!

[@ant_yep]

Wow. Thanks. I totally heard the difference. This helps me out alot

[@gerard9502]

As an electronic engineer I know that the cable isn't has only capacitance but also has impedance and inductance, so, we treat this as an RCL circuit with and AC signal in the input. And to calculate witch frecuencies will be cut at the end of the TX line, we use something called the telegraphist ecuation. but also, when you check the data of the cable, the fabricant tells you witch is the impedance, capacitance and inductance of 1 meter of cable.

[@xanataph]

When the line is really long, like some kind of way-line or landline perhaps, then the total impedance becomes very important. However, for guitar the inductance of of the cable is totally swamped by the inductance of the guitar circuit itself so the capacitance becomes the dominant effect of the cable.

[@IlSinistero]

thats why you usually always should have 1 pedal with a buffer on your pedal board.

[@zaz4667]

Awesome knowledge!

[@Stu_Yorkie]

What this guy doesn't know, isn't worth knowing. He is the best.

[@hoboroadie]

In the olden days we experimented with unshielded lamp cords, nine foot was the limit (IIRC) before 60Hz overwhelmed the signal. Somehow I had associated that with the 18 foot thing.

[@ruiseartalcorn]

I did hear a SLIGHT difference. Having said that, here's a whacky idea - when using a long cable, turn up the treble control on the amp! Just a thought ;)

[@nicks4802]

Or just get an EQ pedal

[@shredgd5]

You can't. You could only do it if the treble control on your amp worked *exactly* on the same frequencies, but it doesn't.

[@Markle2k]

You can't gain back what you've already lost by boosting the signal without raising the noise floor. Even then, you won't get back exactly what you lost.

[@RobMods]

A little treble boost is often all you need to get the job done of course. But to split hairs, the cable capacitance is essentially in parallel with the stay capacitance of your pickups. So it is actually lowering their resonant frequency, above which is a 12dB/octave roll-off. So cranking the treble is not really restoring their true treble character.

[@ruiseartalcorn]

@@RobMods Makes sense. Point taken. Thanks :)

[@JamesSmith-zs8fl]

Well, With my hearing loss, the highs are already gone😁

[@evelasq1]

Thanks for the video and now I may want Wampler buffer boost pedal.

[@JohnZeeX]

I have cables from multiple brands in multiple lengths and my best sounding cable is a 10 foot Lava ELC cable. Yes, I can hear a huge difference in the sound. I play mostly clean, bright percussive stuff through various tube amps (H&K Tubemeister, Fender Blues Deluxe, Peavey Delta Blues) with single coil pickups, and the longer cables sound like a blanket is thrown on my amp. There is a huge loss in clarity. This is fine if you're doing high gain stuff, but for delicate stuff like I play, it's a huge deal.

[@RandyWatson80]

Thanks for the effort

[@dDoOyYoOuUtTuUbBeE]

Let's see spectrum analyzer images.

[@crimfan]

Definitely!

[@TL-angzarr]

Do you hear with a spectrum analyzer? Things can get measured that may not be heard and vice versus

[@garyrowe58]

So, you listen to cables?

[@mikee6666]

@@TL-angzarr . . . . not really. Sure, it can show frequency responses beyond human hearing (and so don't really matter in the practical sense). But the "vice versa" bit isn't true - if folks claim they can "hear differences" where a spectrum analyzer doesn't show a difference, they're imagining it.

[@TL-angzarr]

@@mikee6666 Sorry but it's not entirely true. There are harmonics and harmonic interactions that don't show up on a frequency analyzer that you can hear. You have to understand your brain interprets the frequencies that you hear. It's a biological adaptation. Where a frequency analyzer does none of that. They aren't ears

[@kongandbasses8732]

Back in the days of JBL 120 / 123 /131 - Speakers with aluminum dustcaps long guitar cables have been used to tame the harsh high end of those speakers. If you watch old live videos of Black Sabbath, Jimmy Hendrix and other musicians of the 1960's and 70's and if you are lucky enough that the camera took a shot from the side of the stack, you often will see a long cable lying on the floor. This is the length they didn't need for the stage, but for taming the high end of the speakers.

[@gchampi2]

Same with Buddy Guy. 100+ feet of cable made a maple neck Strat & a silverface Twin usable without shredding everybodys ears...

[@erikvincent5846]

Buffers are interesting. I made my own pedal called the Buff Dude that has a rotary dial that goes through all the types (BJT, JFET, MOSFET, OPAMP, and INVERT OPAMP). Its interesting as it allows you to hear all the subtleties of the different methods of buffering.

[@MrThx3876]

I use a 20 ft coiled cable because I actually like those higher frequencies to be rolled off.

[@PhillipMcKnight]

I heard Santana did this as well

[@fattboyzz1355]

In pusuit of tone you are . Found it you have ;)

[@mikee6666]

Soooo . . . . there's this thing on guitars called a "Tone Knob" . . . . :-| lol ;-)

[@THRASHMETALFUNRIFFS]

Isn't that about 4 miles in actual copper length? Like the intestines?

[@williamsporing1500]

That was a small part of Hendrix tone too

[@danabarnes4751]

I could totally hear the difference, even just listening on my phone

[@THRASHMETALFUNRIFFS]

Right, looking for it, the 18ft was brighter! Surprising...

[@rickfeith6372]

I heard it too...no question

[@GuitarMagik]

Phil great video ....This is all true and as bedroom or weekend players with friends you will notice the difference .....But big stage acts already know how to fix this problem .....Thanks again Phil ...

[@CscotGoodwin]

I'm mostly surprised that the silver sky and princeton didn't get into a fist fight. Nice video as always Phil!

[@sappyse107]

Have you tried a spectrum analyzer? In one instance, I was able to see sections of frequency ranges with no volume to them, making the sound thin. This was a wireless into 20 foot cable into my boss pedals. Switched to a 6" cable and it was perfect. No idea what the cause was, but the android app made it easy to see what was going on.

[@jppagetoo]

The "high frequency" rolloff is real. But most people lose the ability to hear those frequencies as they get older. A young person will hear the difference a lot more than older people.

[@chrisw5742]

Same with singing. As you age you can't hit the high notes anymore.

[@roberteasleysr9108]

Hey , I'm 67 and I heard the difference on the " blind " test 😳

[@SaintFredrocks]

@@chrisw5742 Tell that to Sammy Hagar and Rob Halford.

[@chrisw5742]

@@SaintFredrocks Next time I see them maybe.

[@valuedhumanoid6574]

My wireless unit has a switch that emulates 50 feet of cable. I love it. A Strat on a clean channel can get pretty honest up there and to roll off some of that frequency the makes my dog wince is a nice feature. I call it the "dog switch". He won't come near me if it's off, he will when it's on. And my MXR 10 band EQ has a lot of effect on the highs as well.

[@sparkyguitar0058]

I wish you have included a 5-6 ft cord so we could really hear the difference.

[@skeetschuler1859]

Good video but the difference is noticeable to buy new cables. Thanks Phil

[@bjstein4242]

Phil, great insight.. how does a wireless system compare? Are they not having built in pre-amps to compensate for signal loss as you describe. For that matter would a boost pedal improve the losses of the highs in a long cable situation? Love your channel..

[@rowlandstraylight]

Capacitive loss works like a low pass filter, but before a buffer this interacts with your guitars pickups and controls, so the result is a bit more complex. You can maybe compensate with some smart use of an eq, but a straight amplifying boost won't work. You'll just have a louder, less bright sound. Some wireless units do have a cable compensation sim. When i was using an old one on a passive bass i was rolling back the tone a little because it was quite bright and had more fingernail in the tone. It's much easier to deal with too much bright with an eq tweak than putting the lost high end bqck in.

[@joshuafreedman7703]

BJ Stein Which side of a pedalboard is cabled vs. which side is wireless? Seems to me I'd go wireless into the pedalboard, then wire the board to the amp.

[@rowlandstraylight]

@@joshuafreedman7703 this is the usual way. Particularly as high gain amp users tend to have modulation and delay pedals in the FX loop. This means 3 cables between pedalboard and amp on addition to the wireless in from the guitar (or conventional guitar cable)

[@GregTalksGuitars]

Slight difference, but definitely there. Cool video.

[@donaldfisher8556]

No fooling, I believe I heard it too. Once again Phi you have taken us to some place new. Thank you

[@arvidlystnur4827]

Cables are measured in capacitance per foot. As the length of the cable increases so does the capacitance, thus the decrease in treble response. However a non active guitar, which is essentially a non buffered has a lower impedance and output, suffers a much greater loss on a long cable, than active guitar which has a higher impedance and signal. Thus, a country guitarist who’s playing an old telecaster into a longer cable, needs a lower capacity cable, and or a buffer box or buffer built into the guitar. A buffer between the cable and amp is useless, the signal is already decayed. A buffer between the instrument and cable is useful, as the signal is stronger, thus decays less through the length of the cable.

[@slap_my_hand]

Active pickups still have output resistors, so they are not immune to cable capacitance.

[@arvidlystnur4827]

slap_my_hand, Yes I agree. It’s that active guitars and basses tend to have less of a problem than non active instruments.

[@zordosway3846]

Hi Phil can you make a video on wireless vs cables

[@gangnamstylegrandpa6352]

Just to add my point of view . I have been in bands since 1963 . I do not use pedals , I do not use cables over 12 foot long . I have tried wireless systems , and hated them ! Usually a Strat plugged into a Fender Vibrolux . Volume needs to be at least on 4 on amp, guitar volume on 10 . 45 watts seems to be just right . More and there is too much headroom , less and not enough headroom . I might sound fussy , but I am always happy with my tone . I play mostly bars on weekends , jamming on Blues and Classic rock .

[@J.Burrough]

Yep. Appreciate it.

[@rafaelallenblock]

I build my own out of Kineer [sp?] wire ... low Q low noise no crackle if you step on it ... made for mic cables so I use both hots for the signal and float the shield on one end ... bought a roll and some Switchcraft ends 25 years ago and never looked back. Plus the stuff is slinkier than snot and lays on the stage without kinks and if I ever have one fail [I usually have a 50' and a 25' at any one time] I chop it up into patch cords.

[@joelgrigsby96]

Phil, nice G&L Asat!

[@denniscnf]

Great video! I could tell the diference with the blind test!

[@adam3839]

I usually cannot pick up on minute sound differences. But even through the speakers on my macbook, I could detect a subtle difference.

[@bleckybob]

I have that exact Princeton!

[@landofahhs_1]

The capacitance of cables is no illusion, but more basic ac electronics...and it certainly effects more than guitars especially as the frequency increases.

[@mikee6666]

Found out about cable capacitance completely by accident after years of guitar playing. My electric rig for many years consisted of a Pod running into two powered speakers. A buffered setup, so obviously cable capacitance was never an issue. (And for the record, a fantastic sounding setup that I still use a lot, and that gets plenty of compliments for the great tones.) About 3 or 4 years ago I got an all-tube half stack. I was getting fantastic tone out of it, but for the life of me couldn't understand why I was getting such an inconsistent tone. I could dime the tone one day, leave the settings, and the next day it would just miss the mark. After scratching my head over the issue for a couple of weeks, I coincidentally saw a KZbin vid explaining cable capacitance. All of a sudden it made sense. I swapped and compared the guitar leads I had been using, and sure enough, cable capacitance was the culprit. The difference between using a 3m lead and a 6m lead was as clear as day. That's what made me decide to go wireless in the end, the quest for consistency. For me personally, wireless provides the clearest and most consistent tone.

[@mikee6666]

Now that I think about it, that's the same way I found out about treble bleed and the volume pot! Lol. I acquired a Strat that had extremely noticeable treble loss whenever I used the Vol. I just automatically assumed there was something wrong with the electronics or something. Went online to find out how to go about fixing it, and kept reading that all guitars do it since that's just how electronics work. "BS! None of my other guitars have ever done it!" says the grumpy me. But I plugged in a couple of other gats and listened out for it. And sure enough, clear as day (once I was listening for it), there was the treble loss on them too. Had honestly just not noticed it before. (Mind you, I was deliberately changing my playing style at the time, which would explain it. Used to just turn Vol and Tone all the way up, but was getting into the habit of using them properly to have more control and options over the tone and gain.) Each to their own, but honestly can't stand the tone being changed by the Vol, that's what the Tone is for imo. So now I always install treble bleeds on my guitars, custom values to get it as neutral as possible with a slight erring in preference of keeping more higher frequencies.

[@golfhound]

Good video Phillip. Could you also do one one the QUALITY of guitar cables. Which one(s) do you think are best for the money or just plain BEST quality.

[@jlarrybrewer1149]

To get the absolute BEST TONE POSSIBLE I use a 6 inch patch cable. I can’t move around much but my tone is AWESOME!!!!

[@THRASHMETALFUNRIFFS]

IT'll sound twice as good if you go with the 3"!!

[@jlarrybrewer1149]

THRASH METAL & FUN RIFFS 3 INCHES!!! YOU ARE A MADMAN!!!!!

[@jeffrivera6]

can i use eq pedal to compensate for signal lost..i have a 26ft cable, is adjusting high frequencies on the eq pedal solves the problem? my signal path is guitar-26ft cable-boss TU3-boss ge7-drive pedals, etc. thanks!!

[@dalepal]

Like you said I would never notice the difference if it weren’t for the A/B test but this was a very interesting experiment.

[@genehullinger9614]

Hi Phil, great video. I noticed you showed a picture of the coil type cable. How does that compare to the straight cables and is there a specific reason for the coils?

[@LiveToPlayGuitar]

Hi Phil...I did pick the the 25ft cable out in the blind test (A) but didn’t really hear a big difference in the buffer test...that being said are all wah pedals buffered? I use an EHX Crying Tone...and lastly where in the pedal chain is the best place to put a buffer pedal? Thanks for the great videos! 🎸🔊🎶🤘🏻

[@rowlandstraylight]

Thanks for acknowledging cable capacitance. It's inevitably not mentioned by most guitar cable vendors. I'm not sure ultra-low resistance cable is good here, it's perhaps a speaker wire thing?

[@driven9863]

The Secret is..... "Thicker the Guitar Cable Gauge", "{Less Resistance}. I notice it when I had custom cables made for my Amp head for my speaker cab...

[@lwilton]

Actually resistance doesn't matter with a high impedance guitar output. You would need a few thousand feet of cable before the resistance meant anything. What does matter is the capacitance per foot, and larger diameter cables often have less capacitance (per foot), letting you run a longer cable.

[@WMalven]

The difference is quite noticeable. I didn't expect the blind test, so I closed my eyes on the first test and could easily tell the 25 from the 18. Don't know how vital it is, but it is very interesting to me as an audiophile. The same problem facts audiophiles and their speaker cables--higher capacitance leads to lost fidelity. Thanks, man!

[@TheStompboxer]

Capacitance isn’t a factor with speaker cables.

[@TheBaconWizard]

Yeah not a huge difference, but these things stack-up on aggregate, so you gotta so whatever you can whenever you can to keep the overall result good.

[@johnhmaloney]

I was very skeptical at the start of the video, but I heard a significant difference between the two cables, even in the blind test. The 18 ft. cable sounded much fuller and brighter than the 25. The pedal helped retain some of the frequencies, but I could still hear a difference between it and the 18.

[@DrPepperZZZ]

Last cables I bought I cut and soldered it myself. They were 18' because of the size of the room.

[@ze-ce.cra_]

That's why you plug directly to amp No cables No pedals

[@sparkyguitar0058]

No That's why you have an acoustic. Duh

[@thatziggs4062]

SOLDER THE PICKUP TO THAT AMP, BOY!

[@sparkyguitar0058]

@@thatziggs4062 Actually I use a wireless. Guitar bug,can change guitars as fast as I can sent down and pick up. Not always quiet because I walk all over the house and outside even, so I don't blame the wireless.

[@3vergiven]

I lol'd

[@Nicky-T]

Good video, Phil (as usual). IMHO, the battle of the cables is a waste of breath. Give me a cable (any length, preferably it reaches my amp) of good quality that won't get broken circuits at the plugs, and I'm happy. Also, I would imagine that the roll off of treble will occur with any length of cord to a varying degree. When it reaches an unacceptable level, go shorter. I don't think that any particular length (eg, 18 ft) is magical.

[@AeolianReflex]

What about cabling into and out of effects loops? Does the length matter? Where would a buffer or buffers be most effective? I use a 10 ft cable into my Fractal FX8 and three 18 ft cables for my 4CM setup.

[@PhillipMcKnight]

Effects loops are not all the same so it depends and this would be a great video in itself.

[@ResoBridge]

The simple answer about a buffer is that the nearer you can put a buffer to the guitar (in other words - the shorter the cable from guitar to buffer) the less capacitative loading there will be on the guitar. You should be able to fit any reasonable length of cable between the buffer output and the amplifier, including all the cables in any effects hook up, and it will have no effect on your guitars sound. So place your buffer in front of your effects. However some distortion pedals such as the classic fuzz circuit, are intended to be connected directly to the guitar. If you have a Fuzz Face, place that first, followed by the buffer.

[@Markle2k]

@@ResoBridge You can even place a buffer in front of your guitar's output jack. It only takes a few very small components and a power source.

[@ResoBridge]

@@Markle2k Certainly you can, but an outboard buffer is perhaps more flexible because you can plug in any guitar, rather than having to have an active buffer in every guitar you might use.

[@zggtf211]

You should do an audio spectrum check to see where the highs cut out. Maybe even run as many cables as you can for the longest length possible and see how that sounds.

[@hippietype4171]

Listening on a pair of RF Sennheizers, I nailed the blind test. And I did hear a very mild change in tone. Nothing a little boost from a pedal board won't fix :) The 18 ft. sound the clearest of the bunch hands down. the 25ft was fine but a bit more muddy. Both of them with the booster, still quite noticable vs the 18 ft. But again, nothing a pedalboard won't fix. we guiartist tend to fiddle around with tones, LOL

[@rphuntarchive1]

This isn't about what length cable to use, or whether someone can consciously detect the effect. This is about understanding how your gear affects your sound, even something presumably trivial. It also points out that if you want to get the most out of your carefully chosen guitar and amp, you should pay close attention to your whole signal path. I could definitely hear the difference in the tests, and my hearing is not perfect. Generally, women have better hi-end hearing than men, and young people better hi-end hearing than older. So, just cuz you can't hear a difference doesn't mean no one can. And if you say "yeah but in a noisy bar on a crappy sound system it won't mean anything", that's not always the situation. An intimate club makes better sound important, and then there's the studio too.

[@markkozielec2200]

I’ve never realized there was a difference, but I’ve always had an 18 foot chord from my guitar to amp, or pedalboard. I use a loop switcher, so I only have my wah before it. I do use my Xotic Super Sweet boost, which has a buffer, in my effects loop. I love the way it sounds as an “always on” pedal though there. Ever try that? What did you think?

[@joeguitar8066]

Phil, How about some input on Firefly guitars that are on and off Amazon ? Also how about your take on a VHT Redline 40 R amp head ...... Thanks . Appreciate your information .

[@PhillipMcKnight]

I need to check them out

[@mynamejeff4883]

What I was noticing is that the tail end seemed to ring out a little more, if that makes sense, but not much other difference. To be honest that could be an issue of using devices that run software and have volume leveling controls in the whole thing. I would imagine that it sounds slightly differen, at least, if you are physically there. I may go by my local music store and ask them to repeat the test. The guys there are good people and generally will do anything that seems interresting and adds something different to their day lol.

[@joesosa41]

I'm surprised but I was able to notice. It's possible I did because I expected the highs to be different. It might be that I use big stereo speakers to watch youtube on the TV as well but the difference was really noticeable when I was analyzing the overtones. The overtones on the longer cable "danced/stirred" less with each other while the shorter cable's overtones from the chords were kind of wild and way less restrained. In other words, the longer cable's overtones were more restrained and focused while the overtones on the shorter cable were more noticeable, making the notes less defined because the overtones were heard moving a lot more. This is cool and thanks for the info. It's definitely noticeable and I think both have their possibilities and place. Someone who wants more individual note definition and less messy overtones in their signal chain should definitely consider longer cables while people who are going for more texture and wild, overtone rich tones should consider shorter cables.

[@wileypurchase239]

I definitely heard a difference with the Boss tuner. Much better clarity-wise.

[@harrispapadakis8523]

Phil, does a buffer "cure" all the signal afterwards, no matter the length or do you need a buffer every X feet or so?

[@Markle2k]

I seem to remember hearing a story about one of the classic guitarists (I want to say Bo Diddley) consciously choosing to use a 100 foot cable on stage because he liked the sound.

[@gchampi2]

Buddy Guy used to use a 100+ foot cable, to the extent that he referred to his tech as his "cable valet". He used to occasionally end up playing outside the club! As he was playing a maple neck strat through a silverface twin, it kinda makes sense that he'd want to scrape some of the top end out of his tone...

[@tylergunther8219]

What wall hangers do you use for your guitars? They looks so cool!

[@RobertNolan]

Buffers are always a good idea if you use pedals. Unplugged I didn't think I would hear a difference but there was a slight bit of high end that was lost with the longer cable. The buffer brought some but not all of it back. I would have liked to hear the 18' and then 25' and then the 18' into the tuner into the 25' and see what was lost and restored because it didn't feel like everything came back... maybe 90-95% there?

[@gunnslr]

I am an old truck driver ... always got 18' cable for CB radio and coiled up to reduce noise ... is this the same thing?

[@olafvanrijnsbergen1177]

This is why you should have a buffered bypass pedal upfront of your board... If you dont have that. Get a buffer. All issues fixed. (if you have a really exceptionally long pedalboard you should get a buffer at the end of the board as well.. Or get rid of a lot of pedals. You don't need that much)

[@mikee6666]

Yes and no. Having a buffered pedal sorts the distance from that pedal to the amp, but does nothing about the distance between the guitar and said pedal. Probably a moot point for a lot of guitar players - rooted to the spot, and only need a short lead to the pedal board at their feet. But using my rig as an example, sometimes I just have 2-3 always on (or nearly always) effects that I'll leave on top of the amp, so depending on how far away from the amp I am and how much I'll be moving around I could theoretically need quite a lengthy cable, meaning cable capacitance could be a considerable issue regardless of any buffering I'd have amongst the effects. (Also a moot point since I'd be wireless, lol, but hope you get what I'm meaning.)

[@THRASHMETALFUNRIFFS]

TRUE! I have like 15 pedals in ONE... BOSS ME-70

[@if6turnedouttobe9]

I can too with a measuring tape...haha. That's great...

[@slap_my_hand]

Some day i'll test this by injecting an external magnetic field into my pickup, doing a frequency sweep and measuring the output with various capacitors attached to the output, but i don't have the required equipment right now.

[@saysaylor7662]

Cables differ in capacitance. It’s always a good idea to use the lowest capacitance cable you can afford. I use Sommer Spirit LLX ultra low capacitance cable from ElectricArteria cables and it really makes a difference to guitar sound.

[@Noone-of-your-Business]

What about active electronics on the instrument side then? Those output line level, so they should not suffer as much, should they?

[@Drunkengotaku]

For the Future it would be nice if you could put a download link in the description with uncompressed audio. Trough KZbin, with its own amount of compression, I could just hear that you played different so slightly.

[@Richard1977]

PRS uses VanDamme cable which is stated to have about 90pF/m. In reality it's about 125pF/m (measured several times on several production batches with very precise equipment). This is about the same as the much raved Mogami cable. When asked about this difference, VanDamme refuses to reply and PRS just says that they believe VanDamme's specs to be true. When measuring other brands (Cordial, Sommer Cable, Klotz, Fender and so on) I have always measured the stated capacitance or better (same measuring equipment used) so it's definitely not me. What this comes down to: 1. Do not trust manufacturers and their stated specs. Always check for yourself. 2. More expensive does absolutely not mean better! Usually you are paying an upcharge for name/reputation/snake oil/fairy dust. 3. Always use a cable with a capacitance of 90pF/m or lower and check stated value. This allows you to use a longer cable with same or less loss of highs as a cable with a higher pF like Mogami and VanDamme/PRS. Cheap option: Fender cables because around 85-90pF/m. 4. Always use a buffer if you get above 500/600pF in total. Seems to be a magical number for pro's.

[@TeleCaster66]

There is s a difference but how much that difference matters in a live situation I doubt would be a problem. Also, you can use a cable that has a silver core which sounds noticeably brighter to compensate. I have 2 such cables and when I plug straight into an Amp with them they are too bright so I don't normally like them.

[@overvieweffect9034]

johan segeborn also made a great video on the subject, where he compared a bunch of different cable lengths to using a TU-2. Search "Your GUITAR TONE is KILLED by your CABLE but your TUNER (!) may SAVE YOU! "

[@lance134679]

The difference is so subtle between 18' and 25', especially for someone over 50 like me that can't hear high frequencies as well. Still, it's nice to know why 18' is such a popular length for cables.

[@ricksalt6860]

I have an 11ft Vovox cable , solid core copper . I compared it to George L's , High-end Fender , and Elixer . I played straight into a lightly overdriven Marshall and played only lead lines and quasi be-bop maybe country swing-ish . I changed cables as quickly as I could between comparisons . Not really noticing much difference accept the George L's was the brightest . What I realized was the Vovox 11ft = $172 Canadian , I was playing more fluently . It just felt more responsive , my picking hand wasn't beating the shit out of the strings to get the amp to respond . It was more about feel than tone . A store owner told me a guy returned his Vovox cable because it was screwing up his playing , tooo responsive .

[@TheStompboxer]

Haha, that’s fantastic. Literally.

[@gtr1952]

I've always used the shortest cable practical for the situation because I thought the signal strength was so low. Several years ago I added a Radial passive DI box to force using the ground from the amp. With that I could notice better high mid and lows in long and shorter, cheap and expensive cables. Still use the shortest cable, but don't buy the most expensive ones now. JMHO...

[@RobCabreraCh]

I couldn't hear anything watching this on my phone.... however, I definitely can hear it when playing at home. I can hear so much difference, that sometimes I just use a 10 ft cable directly into my amp, and it does sound better to me in the room. Is just a little bit more. Edit: Granted, my amp has to be turned up quite loud for me to notice it. I wouldn't notice it if I were to play at bedroom levels.

[@craigthompson7070]

Good summary. Some significant differences aren't audible at lower volumes. That's why getting great tone live is so difficult. Can't properly tweak at home.... even of you can occasionally crank it up, it's not the same when your drummer, bassist and singer are in the mix in a live room with an audience... when live tone sounds great you have done something very elusive!

[@jorgecrespo1504]

I could not hear any difference, possibly the speakers that I use on my computer? What happens if I go wireless?