Hi Seeker fam, As you've all already noticed, the molecule at the top of this video is not actually H2O, it's HO2, a simple, but critical mistake. In case you're wondering, HO2, also known as Hydroperoxyl radical, does actually exist! An oxygen radical, it's highly reactive - though it's molecular structure is a bit different than what's pictured above. Mistakes can be fun when they teach you new things? Learn more about HO2 here! - pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/520535#section=Top
@The_Hell_Lord6 жыл бұрын
i get 10 seconds into a metallic hydrogen video and this happens. day ruined!
@zukodude4879876 жыл бұрын
This mistake will cost you your life!
@spudthepug6 жыл бұрын
I’m noticing other things about the thumbnail.
@JeffSyam6 жыл бұрын
I paused at 0:11 and directly go to comment section, and apparently, you guys already make an amend (not really tho) :-), but it's OK.
@JeffSyam6 жыл бұрын
zukodude, I understand your's is a pun, but you make it simple and stright to the point man.
@TheuLTIMATEmANkINDada6 жыл бұрын
Did you guys say water and display two oxygen and one hydrogen atom at 0:09? I think you want to check your water.
@aonodensetsu6 жыл бұрын
yup, they did
@Noah_Zion6 жыл бұрын
Is it supposed to be one oxygen and two hydrogen?
@josiahklein706 жыл бұрын
I was just going to comment about this heresy.
@RBuckminsterFuller6 жыл бұрын
I didn't even notice that. Delicious O2H.
@alakas7066 жыл бұрын
sorry to be that guy, but it would be HO2
@ThisIsAdamB6 жыл бұрын
This water doesn't taste so good, Mr. Stark...
@SabertoothedFrostbite5 жыл бұрын
**EXPLODES**
@QuantumAscension15 жыл бұрын
@@SabertoothedFrostbite Hehe, get it, cuz its basically rocket fuel, lol
@Ankushdas20014 жыл бұрын
IsThisAdamB
@ThisIsAdamB4 жыл бұрын
@@Ankushdas2001 This is ThisIsAdamB. Just like it says.
@Ankushdas20014 жыл бұрын
@@ThisIsAdamB Ok. Just checking that IsThisAdamB, because we found fraudulent activity on your KZbin channel
@yashkhambhatta95366 жыл бұрын
1:07 "like a substitute teacher ,under enought pressure they snap" Lmao im dead
@Super-Saiyan-Blue-Gogeta5 жыл бұрын
I hope they didn't test that theory.
@Carfeu5 жыл бұрын
Best quote
@jacobisaacs6005 жыл бұрын
yash khambhatta cringe
@ikichullo4 жыл бұрын
Hi dead, i'm ikichullo
@kaushikgupta94906 жыл бұрын
0:10 when chemistry is involved but the editor is performing his own chemistry with weed
@koninkrijkdernederlanden87116 жыл бұрын
No, that's chemistry in US Imperial units.
@glaucousgrey9906 жыл бұрын
Hate to break it to ya bud, but H2O is the same no matter which units you are using. Not to mention science is conducted using the metric system in the United States. Even our science classes in school. Having to learn two measurement systems really blows.
@shoaibaszx4106 жыл бұрын
Grey Pierce are you autistic?
@dgalloway1076 жыл бұрын
shoaszx Are you a phallus?
@dgalloway1076 жыл бұрын
Grey Pierce Might want to mention you were responding to the guy joking about units. I believe he was referring to the fact that Imperial units can barely be used in Macroscale science, much less Microscale.
@tabingoliver6 жыл бұрын
That water molecule in the beginning tho
@im_aleey6 жыл бұрын
Delicious HO2
@tabingoliver6 жыл бұрын
@@im_aleey would prefer some gatorade but nothing can substitute good ol' HO2 😂
@Stinkys80506 жыл бұрын
After all these years I don’t know who to believe anymore
@stephensu43716 жыл бұрын
hand on a sec, i found something with 2 O and one H, Dioxidanyl or Hydroperoxyl
@tabingoliver6 жыл бұрын
@@stephensu4371 the bond of hydroperoxyl is H-O-O not O-H-O
@Miloristify6 жыл бұрын
Can't even get H2O right?
@aonodensetsu6 жыл бұрын
they got dehydrated
@AP-yx1mm6 жыл бұрын
Nah I think is that they didn't even bother about it so less concentration more probable errors. Or as would italians say, one can get lost in a glass of water...
@sergeantdornan70006 жыл бұрын
You mean Gucci Mane....?
@matthewsmith17796 жыл бұрын
As soon as I saw that I was like; "Hmmm, that ain't right. . ."
@senapathivenkataramana006 жыл бұрын
But it's hydroperoxyl-radical
@LyricWulf6 жыл бұрын
*HOO they made a big mistake!*
@nicholas19karr4 жыл бұрын
you mean "OOH they made a big mistake!" ?
@kaischrank4 жыл бұрын
@@nicholas19karr No
@kadenpeters86473 жыл бұрын
You mean HO2?
@jurbroek81176 жыл бұрын
The Harvard scientists who supposedly made and lost the Metallic Hydrogen said that they would try and recreate the experiment, although I haven’t been able to find out if they are still trying or not. I also want to add that working with extreme high pressure is very difficult and it isn’t unimaginable that something did go wrong, even if it can look a bit suspicious. Just a thought. I came upon metallic Hydrogen whilst working on a school paper for my exam, but I sadly can’t find a lot of information about the subject. I think it’s important to keep up to date with up and coming technology such as this, since it could easily be forgotten about and abandoned. I just want to say that you are doing great things spreading news about more unknown science, and explaining it at an easy to understand level. Keep it up.
@goosee7776Ай бұрын
Your smart folks Harvard University, I noticed
@orangechickenz6 жыл бұрын
'Pics or it didn't happen.' - The Scientific Community 3:15
@LordxJoe4 жыл бұрын
Honestly, if it was metallic, couldn't they use a magnet to find it?
@Andre-gn4sj4 жыл бұрын
@@LordxJoe metallic does not necessarily mean magnetic.
@LordxJoe4 жыл бұрын
@@Andre-gn4sj true
@petercarioscia91896 жыл бұрын
To make the diamod anvils smooth enough to compress the hydrogen, they had to coat the contact surfaces with alumina, and some scientist speculate that's what underwent the phase transition, and not the hydrogen. That's just a hypothesis I heard, maybe even from Seeker...I can't weigh in, but it sounds plausible to a random KZbin commentor
@user-oe2xk6ud1y6 жыл бұрын
I know they're wrong about HO2. But at least they're trying to give us great content
@jakoblenke30126 жыл бұрын
Thats Hydroperoxyl-Radical at 0:09
@Videohead-eq5cy6 жыл бұрын
Nope, in the radical the oxygen atoms are directly joined and one one of them is joined is to the hydrogen atom
@MegaIkkuh6 жыл бұрын
maybe they just wanted to say their water is rad
@svda8145 жыл бұрын
ohw well You God damn genius
@jotaro48746 жыл бұрын
I dont think that one atom of hidrogen bond to 2 oxigen 00:09
@thegamer53676 жыл бұрын
*hydrogen and oxygen
@crashbandicooch27866 жыл бұрын
Buddy piss off like u know science don’t even how to fucking spell
@blureddyelo3476 жыл бұрын
Yeah its opposite , oxygen has 2 valence electrons thats why i can hold 2 hydrogen hence h20 2 hydrogen 1 oxygen
@blureddyelo3476 жыл бұрын
@@crashbandicooch2786 you piss off , unlike yoy we listened in oyr chemistry class
@xeno41625 жыл бұрын
AND I DON'T THINK YOU SPELLED OXYGEN RIGHT.
@Omastian6 жыл бұрын
Very informative and your enthusiasm is quite contagious, well done.
@kenneth67314 жыл бұрын
01:28 "Instead of a molten iron core like inside of Earth" This doesn't make sense to me. Iron melts at 1,538° C, however the Curie temperature of Iron or 770° C is the temperature where Iron loses it's magnetism. How could Earth's core retain it's magnetic properties when it's at least 768° hotter than the point Iron loses it's magnetic properties?
@fancypesto36472 ай бұрын
Because it's a bunch of electrically conductive mass all spinning around one common axis. The Curie temperature is for permanent magnets, what is occurring in the Earth is an induced magnetic field.
@saivenkatpokala81376 жыл бұрын
There are some drawbacks living on earth Me: at least we are living
@SomethingStrange15796 жыл бұрын
This channel is so awesome. Thank you for all the info you guys share. Bc of this channel I've actually been inspired to start by own to help spread great messages to people who may need it. Thank you very much.
@Sivah_Akash6 жыл бұрын
That's good
@jeanettehernandez18786 жыл бұрын
That is wonderful. I wish you the best. I'll help by supporting. Subbed. 🤩
@JamenFunReview6 жыл бұрын
Something strange you have potential. I look forward to your future videos because you have good content thats worth the while. I'm your 138th subscriber. 😊
@hvip46 жыл бұрын
Just remember that they uploaded video defending more than 2 gender bullshit
@hermanjohnson91806 жыл бұрын
Neat. 😊
@VGAstudent6 жыл бұрын
Metalic-hydrogen is the thermal regulator of the star's nuclear fusion reaction! If it's a superconductor, it maintains temperature "globally" at the contact surface of the hydrogen metal and the hydrogen liquid. It makes for very quick thermal discrimination at the quantum level.
@deep.space.125 жыл бұрын
So... *WHY* Metallic Hydrogen Is the Holy Grail of High Pressure Physics?
@PaulDormody5 жыл бұрын
He mentions it would be a room temperature superconductor , but the catch is it probably needs a high pressure environment to exist.
@tylerdurden37225 жыл бұрын
Rocket fuel is the primary potential use.
@coleharding94394 жыл бұрын
It takes an uncompromising physical environment and tons of resources to replicate it on earth
@curiosity96786 жыл бұрын
3:34 um, it's micrometer too big for a atomic sample give the average order of magnitude is about a an angtrom
@hasher22656 жыл бұрын
So what's the nature of the bond? Is it ionic or a covalent style bond when pressure achieves molecular solid hydrogen?
@taj41376 жыл бұрын
Should be covalent I think, because there's only one type of molecule involved :)
@hasher22656 жыл бұрын
@@taj4137: It puzzled me when he said the electron proton structure breaks down. So I wasn't sure of the relationship.
@taj41376 жыл бұрын
@@hasher2265 Oh you're right.. I briefly forgot about that detail hehe.. dunno m8, clueless
@chavezharding78206 жыл бұрын
Zeutrus Bd It's called "metallic hydrogen" How can the bond be covalent if it's called " *metallic* hydrogen"???
@chavezharding78206 жыл бұрын
Ryan Smith It's a metallic bond... like in the name and the guy explained in this same video that there's so much pressure the electrons are freed from the complete pull of the neutron causing them to be free in a sea/pool of electrons as a result they are great conductors of heat and electricity which are both characteristics of the metallic bond.
@lawrenceglaser15305 жыл бұрын
Harvard, uhhhh if solid hydrogen nano pellet was lost in pile of diamond dust, you could have used a magnet to pick it up. duuuhh?
@PancreasForBreakfast6 жыл бұрын
I love me some HO2
@qohaw_28835 жыл бұрын
HO 2.0
@Bassotronics6 жыл бұрын
Metallic hydrogen will surely revolutionize electronics as we know it and provide us with the superconducting batteries as well as superconducting devices at room temperature which is currently not possible.
@dhruvpatel94896 жыл бұрын
Oxygen atom is wrong
@OmegaMegalodon6 жыл бұрын
The hydroperoxyl radical, also known as the perhydroxyl radical, is the protonated form of superoxide with the chemical formula HO2. Yea, this is not water, which is H20.
@domesticd3signer339 Жыл бұрын
0:16 you got the molecule mixed up, the one you showed had 1 hydrogen bonded to 2 oxygen, when its actually vice versa to make water
@Sol_Invictus_6 жыл бұрын
Thanks for using SI units
@YodaMan-4206 жыл бұрын
"like a substitute teacher - with enough pressure they snap" dark. i like it.
@townrumor6 жыл бұрын
🛌 I know it’s early but get it together 💭
@sagittariusa99872 жыл бұрын
min 0:10 ITS H2O NOT HO2; 2 HYDROJEN 1 OXYGEN
@ihas84076 жыл бұрын
1:06 i just watched a key & peele video about substitute teachers...
@totallynot0something0476 жыл бұрын
a-aron is that you?
@akk29446 жыл бұрын
"Like a substitute teacher, with enough pressure those hydrogen molecules snap"LOLOLOL
@saltblood6 жыл бұрын
But how does it taste
@beinfomaniac71826 жыл бұрын
Really loved this channel
@anuranjanpandey86046 жыл бұрын
0:10 they can't even get water correct.. lol
@thedinkster52526 жыл бұрын
Anuranjan Pandey shave that rat off ur face
@anuranjanpandey86046 жыл бұрын
@@thedinkster5252 😂😂 way to busy for that.
@kamelsamer57682 жыл бұрын
0:24 yes everyone knows that, everyone can go take a sample and check it out lol
@MatejB696 жыл бұрын
0:09 whaaaat??
@dagmawimoges60804 жыл бұрын
Hey Yo @Seeker This method creates around 607GPa which can be extended to 1TPa, but during the cold war underground nuclear explosions used to create pressure up to 20TPa.. So can't we just use those to create metallic hydrogen. I am not physicist , just wondering...
@nobody.of.importance Жыл бұрын
0:14 I am genuinely triggered by you making the hydrogen atoms red. Hydrogen is virtually always colored white! Oxygen is supposed to be red! GAHHHH I'm not actually upset but it was very confusing for a second.
@PaulPaulPaulson6 жыл бұрын
Oh no! Someone is wrong on the interwebs! Get over it, literally everyone knows what it's supposed to look like. Our mighty brains should be able to auto correct it while watching.
@fossforever5126 жыл бұрын
Paul Paulson criticizing is simply a way to help people grow. Would you really rather no one say anything?
@thechino1316 жыл бұрын
Criticism my ass yall just some pompous fake intellectuals trynna correct someone over a minor spelling error
@thechino1316 жыл бұрын
That how you use constructive criticism btw
@raccoonchild6 жыл бұрын
Okay but the idea is showing that we care so they pay more attention to their own videos in the future. Nobody would improve without criticism.
@fossforever5126 жыл бұрын
Kdot I disagree it’s not “just a minor spelling error” it’s false information. And sure for people like us who understand that it’s fine but for the less educated it might confuse them or even make them think something that is factually wrong. And seeing as this channel is all about education if they fail to educate properly they should be subject to criticism.
@CattyPHall2 жыл бұрын
Extra terrestrials shattered the diamonds because we aren't mature enough for the tech yet. Very nice video! Thanks for sharing
@unleashingpotential-psycho94336 жыл бұрын
Metallic hydrogen is awesome.
@litesp6 жыл бұрын
"Like a substitute teacher, with enough pressure, those hydrogen molecules snap." :-)
@josephstraley63255 жыл бұрын
This man needs some protein
@declana58516 жыл бұрын
What water are you guys drinking at seeker hahah
@truetech41586 жыл бұрын
Declan A the kind of water that makes koolade..
@mrsxg6 жыл бұрын
Two guys walk into a chemist bar and first says, I'll have some H2O, drinks his glass and walks out. Other one says, I'll have some H2O too, drinks it and drops dead.
@DaniilDimitrov6 жыл бұрын
i LIKE this dude
@ragnarox166 жыл бұрын
Same
@novoscorp72755 жыл бұрын
If we could harness metallic hydrogen, what would the applications be ?
@akhil.x6 жыл бұрын
It's H20 not O2H
@0012erick5 жыл бұрын
If a diamond cannot contain hydrogen gas its unlikely anything can although the next question would be carbon nanotubes. Certainly you can put hydrogen in a carbon nanotube or sandwich it in a two sheets of graphene bonded together at the edges which I'm guessing would make it "no longer graphene".
What is the atmosphere to Pascal conversion? Is that a petapascal?
@TheArgusPlexus6 жыл бұрын
H2O is two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom XD
@oneandonlyjark6 жыл бұрын
Metallic H provides a good framework to start discussing crystal structures as well, albeit at an upper year university or graduate level, lol. This is somewhat misleading though: "metallic" materials and compounds need not be solid AFAIK, but a lot of the talk and hype around Metallic H is about *solid* metallic H.
@Lightning90606 жыл бұрын
Did they draw HO2? 😅😂
@billdecat8555 жыл бұрын
Just a shot in the dark here but if the diamond dust (pure carbon) was exposed to a strong enough EM field would it not be affected and allow the separation of the H from the C.
@superjeffstanton6 жыл бұрын
I like not hearing the Gay dude everyday. I love science, but his voice and nuance was unbearable- I didn't watch the videos any more. Being honest here.
@williamputnam2816 жыл бұрын
love this channel, but, the diagram at 00:09 of water isn’t H2O, it’s HO2. lol
@Abel11206 жыл бұрын
trump will solve everting he is smart
@cjg87636 жыл бұрын
A stable genius with all the best words. 🤣🤣🤣
@Slideyslide6 жыл бұрын
He hires all the best people... even if they are corrupt and getting arrested.
@casedinlight6 жыл бұрын
"everting"
@Ilavalavan-w4u23 күн бұрын
Its H20 Not H02
@ramaraksha016 жыл бұрын
Why is it the holy grail? What is the purpose of making this liquid hydrogen? What are its uses? I wish he could have touched upon these questions
@MisterRazz6 жыл бұрын
I wish it was a typo... But the animation clearly drops the oxygen and bonds the single hydrogen with another hydrogen...
@Cat-ct9hn6 жыл бұрын
Um, I don‘t think you were going for a molecule of the hydroperoxyl radical at 0:08 ...
@Calzour2 жыл бұрын
The claim of a static pressure synthesis of metallic hydrogen was claimed purely from an iPhone picture- there were no data collected showing a metallic transition such as the disappearing of the hydrogen vibron seen by Raman Spectroscopy. They literally saw it go “shiny” in a microscope and took a picture and published a paper. It is completely disputed and does not count as a claim of synthesis of metallic hydrogen.
@clarkbrowngaming3505 жыл бұрын
Like a substitute teacher with enough pressure they snap
@kamoroso946 жыл бұрын
0:10 already off to a great start with the "water" molecule.
@brendonmoore35056 жыл бұрын
So why is this the holy grail? What will it bring to the table? Super conductor? I’m not educated in such things but find it highly fascinating.
@tempname82636 жыл бұрын
Well, I know that it's an incredible energy storage. Hydrogen + oxygen combination in itself is quite energetic. And if we make hydrogen more unstable by weakening it's bonds, it's explosive capability would become couple times as strong.
@4vediotube4 жыл бұрын
Graphene fits your criteria, is it a metal? And as far as condensed hydrogen, how about the Rydberg forms?
@saturn91996 жыл бұрын
Since hydrogen is in the akaline family, I think it is weirder that hydrogen is a nonmetallic than it being metallic at high pressures.
@Zantagiro6 жыл бұрын
nice presentation ginger!
@leeuum7646 жыл бұрын
there's always one
@tiekogalaxylatte88396 жыл бұрын
Funny thing is when the wrong "HO2" molecule was shown, my body started hurting for a minute, as if it couldn't handle what it was seeing lol
@bestfightsever90005 жыл бұрын
Somebody give this guy a biscuit
@gutterball106 жыл бұрын
finding a bit of metallic hydrogen in diamond dust gives finding a needle in a haystack a new meaning
@isaacgardner54185 жыл бұрын
00:10 mate, sorry to break it to ya. but H2O mean 2 hydrogens and one oxygen not 2 oxygens and one hydrogen
@mikeock20876 жыл бұрын
Wait so youre saying there is a super conductor at room temperature and we were able to create it? Why not repeat that process and try to industylise it so we can have hoverboards
@bigbluebuttonman11374 жыл бұрын
Scientists: "We could get to Mar-" Me: "So how can I weaponize this?"
@Velocitist4 жыл бұрын
*America has entered the chat
@bigbluebuttonman11374 жыл бұрын
Tom Kao True.
@Velocitist4 жыл бұрын
Big blue Button man Great, now I’m sad. For obvious reasons.
@benjamindare55905 жыл бұрын
My understanding of the coldest temperature is that it is -273C or 0K. Where did the 1,700 degrees below come from?
@caffeinato6 жыл бұрын
At 0:34 you can see an edited transition of his face, I got spooked for a second.
@mike8140315 жыл бұрын
2:08 wait a minute how would the lasers put pressure on the deuterium? wouldn't they just heat it up?
@tech_q37985 жыл бұрын
love the small fahrenheit, in the corner as it should be...
@ngeteengetee75896 жыл бұрын
For the water illistration its wrong, what you showed was h02 not h20
@francisking7083 жыл бұрын
0:12. What is this molecule please?
@KahleKingzTV6 жыл бұрын
Could Hydrogen, electricity, somehow be used to reach hyper speed? 🤔
@washingtonwebfoot99085 жыл бұрын
What is hyper speed? If you mean light speed or beyond, then no. It is an inviolable speed limit.
@yahikotendo56316 жыл бұрын
0:09 no wonder I kept doing bad in chemistry. See I always thought it was H2O, silly me.
@luisvalencia99626 жыл бұрын
I had a substitute teacher more like U-235, snapped when a random neutron passed by.
@Abbbb2254 жыл бұрын
Also, barely touched on material properties of metallic hydrogen, liquid or otherwise. Left me kind of cold re: why we should invest so much into its synthesis.
@Malassaf976 жыл бұрын
so could it also mean that the sun has a metallic core? cause it's mainly hydrogen and helium
@rastrisfrustreslosgomez5446 жыл бұрын
The sun most definitely has a metallic core. We think it's liquid and until someone manages to make solid hydrogen it will stay that way
@icwiz6 жыл бұрын
wait, so the metallic hydrogen would hold its shape in normal atmospheric pressure? I don't get that bit of the finding a spec of it amongst the debris of that diamond.
@Pointyy6 жыл бұрын
O2H what element is that?
@ScienceByMike6 жыл бұрын
Did they have HO2 rather than H2O at 0:09?
@miketurner34616 жыл бұрын
Like a substitute teacher, under enough pressure those hydrogen atoms will dissociate and breakdown right in front of your eyes.
@ickn20056 жыл бұрын
Dang thats like searching for metallic hydrogen in a pile of diamond dust. Sounds like a good burn.
@colleenharrison16386 жыл бұрын
So sometimes it's not as good being on Earth because we don't have a bunch of metallic hydrogen? That kind of doesn't make sense but the concept is really neat.
@ThirdDegreeHugs6 жыл бұрын
Wait, if the solid metallic hydrogen was lost in diamond dust, couldn't they just put a piece of glass and a magnet over the pile, it being metallic should give it magnetic properties, no?