Why side with Ukraine? Answering Tucker Carlson's Question

[@russellmorgan8609]

Tucker Carlson is Nuts!

[@timeloving5799]

Thanks 👍🙏🙏🙏

[@alanmonroe6585]

Thank you! ❤

[@aaron3890]

Prof Gerdes brought me hear. These videos are so helpful for us ignorant Westerners, please keep it up!

[@kamsotas]

Thank you

[@pcread]

"There are no stupid questions, just stupid people" - Mr Garrison, South Park

[@Savage_Sage]

Imagine a person with average IQ So half of the people are even dumber

[@kurtrawicz1455]

Thank you, man. I've been raised in Russia. I am from Kuban, I think you know what it is, now I live in Georgia. I am ukrainian and I always supported Ukraine. Also, I am devoted christian and conservative, and it's painful for me to watch how Putin brainwashed my western co-thinkers. I hope to join you soon in this informational front. Keep going, you are doing the good thing.

[@Юкі-с4т]

Дуже чітко і по фактам. Жаль що всім байдуже що в Україні війна, дивлячись на кількість військової підтримки.

[@brettwallace1604]

Just came across your channel so listening to some old stuff. I feel I’ve heard some bad/ dark thing about Ukraine for many years so I feel you’re obviously biased but maybe rightfully so. I appreciate hearing your side of the argument since I feel our media, mostly, leans Ukraines way. Wish you and your people the best. War is not going to be the answer in the end. Peace.

[@FiveLiver]

His question is pure Realpolitik, there is no moral component whatever. Rather shocking that he could be like that.

[@russellesimonetta9071]

Uhh, Tuckers father was CIA. Tucker loves Orban.

[@MadDog-1961]

Why side with Ukraine? WWII never ended it was put on pause!

[@Savage_Sage]

Hitler's allies (the USSR prior 1941) - still persist indeed, granted in more limited form but with nukes...

[@cavi900]

Not to agree with Carlson but to explain: Tucker is following the concept of realpolitik which is an amoral consideration of what is in a country's best geopolitical interests. Tucker is taking the same but opposite stance as Kissinger and Nixon took in 1970 in allying with China where the CCP had already murdered tens of millions of their own people to put pressure on the Soviets and North Vietnamese.

[@jamesedwards6173]

Except that he's not since it could not be clearer that it is in the U.S.'s strategic interest to side with Ukraine.

[@pvmt86]

Why are you not fighting at the front?

[@Savage_Sage]

I'm fighting at informational front. Are you trying to shame me?

[@pvmt86]

@@Savage_Sage Yes, because your arguments against the Russians are laughable and shallow.

[@Ryanbutlerofehisjgl]

@@Savage_Sage Much easier to "fight" with information than with bombs and bullets. I know if my country was invaded I would sign up immediately to defend it.

[@johnslusarenko3309]

You are very lucky not to have the neighbours Yaroslavl has.@@Ryanbutlerofehisjgl

[@TheLashmanov]

@@Ryanbutlerofehisjgl Actually you have to be quite smart to “fight” with information and not many people can actually be effective in that area. On the other hand anyone can can sign up to the army… best we all play to our strengths as a team

[@baneta1]

Most people here think tucker carlson is a jackass, russian propaganda uses him all the time. History will show, he was clearly on the wrong side

[@Savage_Sage]

I have four friends who like him. He's like a cult leader. They find ways to rationalize his lies. Like when he lied about Ukraine not being democracy - my friend said, well it's a republic

[@rayfighter]

@@Savage_Sage ahaha, well, it's a republic. I think that even those 4 friends will have to agree, that Tucker is an opportunistic career spineless asshole, and the reasons why they would like such a person could be interesting to reveal :D

[@sjoerdberkhuijsen8155]

@@Savage_Sage That's exactly the same reasoning trumptards use to defend undemocratic actions/laws/whatever : "The us isn't a democracy, it's a republic!"