kzbin.info/www/bejne/gGjTi4x9qauUeJo ► Why The 2S7M Malka Superheavy Self Propelled Is Most Feared
@orkako2 жыл бұрын
It's not scary at all. It's form over substance. As practical as German giant railroad guns.
@Joshua-lt7tk2 жыл бұрын
Ii keeping o
@terryfreeman10182 жыл бұрын
Korea has grown in to a powerhouse. I was stationed there in '85. I miss Korea.
@버프코트2 жыл бұрын
@@김선우-s7r6i 85년이라고요.
@AndrewJeon2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your service, sir.
@로미오-s2p2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for cherishing and loving Korea I hope you are always healthy
@samkim90572 жыл бұрын
It's time for a visit!
@tesla33882 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your service. Next time plz visit anytime for travel. Proud of you ❤️👍🏻
@busyhoneybee4517 Жыл бұрын
King of Howitzers.
@MohammadAdliadlious2 жыл бұрын
Egypt recently got a license to manufacture the K9 thunder, very impressive artillery system.
@adisura99042 жыл бұрын
India recently bought these under the name K9 Vajra. About a 100 are in service and further 200 more are planned to be ordered. They are being made locally in India with some India specific upgrades.
@nedkelly96882 жыл бұрын
Australia is doing the same and building them in Australia too.
@Gautham91252 жыл бұрын
K9 Vajra basically means Thunder in sankirit. Like the K9 Thunder.
@kiabtoomlauj62492 жыл бұрын
Poland has already ordered 1,000. The first 100 or so are shipped from South Korea, while the rest are to be built in Poland, a joint venture between Poland and South Korea, so the units will more naturally fit Poland's specific needs. Poland also ordered American Abrams, but due to the limited supply and less willing to share technologies, by the Americans, Poland opted to diversify its top end military purchases. Also, from South Korea, Poland is likely buying the K239 (HIMARS made in South Korea, consulted with the Americans and companies involved in the buiding of HIMARS). Plus air force training planes. Point is, South Korea has not built itself into a global top end military powerhouse... with most of its most advanced weapons systems being compatible with NATO countries own weapons,
@tin-n-tan2 жыл бұрын
@@kiabtoomlauj6249 Poland also wants more of a defensive force so these are sort of more useful than the Abrams. stand off and demolish attackers.
@patrioticsammy64542 жыл бұрын
the thumbnail is also from India also
@muneirovalibas61942 жыл бұрын
I remembered in the early 2000s Nkorea launched a sudden short bombardment of a Skorean border town. Reports that I heard that the K9s immediately responded as counter-battery. The NKoreans suspended almost just as quickly, with reports saying the K9s precision and SKorean obviously superior radar inflicting heavy casualties on the norther side.
@Chaffchaffe2 жыл бұрын
음흉한 북한은 K9의 훈련사격이 끝나기를 기다렸다가 도발을 시작했다. K9의 탄이 모자라서 직접 옮겼음에도 상당히 빠르게 반격했고 대포병 레이더가 없었음에도 그 당시 사진을 보면 알수있지만 괜찮은 탄착군을 형성했다.
@putcheeseonit Жыл бұрын
I believe this is the bombardement of Yeonpyeong?
@michael73242 жыл бұрын
Im amazed at the reload vehicle frankly
@donghwankim24018 ай бұрын
With the exception of Germany and France, all countries prefer K9s. From this, it can be inferred that there is not much difference between the quality and price of self-propelled guns in European countries. If you want to play tanks, it is appropriate to buy German tanks, but if you want to win a war, you should buy Korean weapons.
@jeffstrong45802 жыл бұрын
S Korea has the largest modern artillery units in the world with 1040 K55, 1200 K9 and 850 K105A1 supported by 58 M270, 367 K239 and K136 MRL. S Korean army also has about 5,000 105/155mm towed artillery and 6,000 60/81/107/120mm mortars stocked with somewhere around 12-15 million rounds.
@kiabtoomlauj62492 жыл бұрын
When you're living with nice neighbors like Putin and Kim, who could wine and dine with you on caviar one day, all smiling big fake smiles.... and bombard you the next day with high velocity shells & missiles, you have to be ready, with lots of options... Ukraine's problem was that even after Russia forcibly took Crimea, 2014, it didn't believe --- up until the last hour of the actual invasion --- that Russia was going to invade and try to decapitate Zelensky's Jewish "Nazi" government... and install a puppet who would just read a few lines from the teleprompter, written by Putin, about how they're both Slavic people and there's no need to join evil, aggressive NATO, the EU, etc.
@swarnamohanty31212 жыл бұрын
What's the use, it's only enemy N. Korea talks with Atom bomb.
@dingchavez19602 жыл бұрын
That's a lot of firepower.
@Chaffchaffe2 жыл бұрын
Because of north korea
@lukluke24612 жыл бұрын
somehow has a bizzarly powerful army forces despite being a penisula nation...
@amitbhau2 жыл бұрын
L&T mnc company of India was also produced 100 k9 and delivered to Indian army, there is additional orders of 200 k9 in the pipeline
@UltimateTruthChannel6 ай бұрын
Korean here. Our winters are Siberian cold. Our summers are Vietnam hot and wet. We can survive anywhere in the world. So can our weapons. Always built with extreme four seasons in mind.
@garrykim52202 жыл бұрын
Maximum firing range 18 km (M107, HE) 30 km (M549A1, RAP/HE) 36 km (K310, BB/DP-ICM) 40 km (K307, BB/HE) 54 km (K315, BB+RAP/HE)
@sabrehohoho76812 жыл бұрын
You must be in the service or an ex-army/gunner. Did you, bro?
@유튜브_YT-g9k Жыл бұрын
@@sabrehohoho7681 All Korean men go to the army 😅😅
@2serveand2protect Жыл бұрын
@@유튜브_YT-g9k GOOD! That is one the main reason why they grow into excellent, and productive citizens.
@kittycatcat6962 Жыл бұрын
Keeeeewl.... Base bleed is fun
@유튜브_YT-g9k Жыл бұрын
@@2serveand2protect is this correct? 😢😢
@GoogIe_UK Жыл бұрын
World-class performance Nearly half the price of the competition 5x faster production capacity than the competition Proven reliable in cold frozen Finland and hot desert Egypt Still haven't bought?
@zdravkodomic50294 ай бұрын
It's not as good as western equipment though. Also we should always prefer European production.
@ABCDE-i9e4 ай бұрын
@@zdravkodomic5029 2x expensive and 5x slow producing European ones? lol
@rustcohle349 Жыл бұрын
Because Korea is one of the few countries in the arms market capable of building stuff in large numbers. Doesn't matter if western equivalents are better or not. They gutted their manufacturing abilities.
@bertnl5309 ай бұрын
That is a very good reason. What does the best tank or howitzer or HIMARS or IFV brings, when you have to wait 6 years for it? It means you won't have it the next 6 years and when, then it is only the beginning. Before the full delivery is made, it may cost another 2 or 3 years, just because other customers want the same thing. I see nowadays Rheinmetall and BAE change their policy a little, wanting to build premises in other countries. Perhaps that has to do with the connections between Hanwha /Hyundai and Poland. Once a country chooses a particular system and it works well, then the competitors know they won't stand a chance with their systems in that country as long as they are not looking for newer or more. Also no revenues of aftersales or spare parts. Another thing is price policy. Army purchasers and fans of arms and ordnance can dream from the combination PZH 2000 and Exalibur shells. Reality however is that you will loose on persevance then. One can hit a target on 50 KM very precise , but for most targets it ain't neccesary. One can have the most expensive gun in the world, but then you miss money for ordnance and spares.
@divinewind63132 жыл бұрын
South Korea also doesn’t involve themselves in the politics of the customer nation. One of the key reasons why India went for this machine.
@MyH3ntaiGirl2 жыл бұрын
Yep Us Vietnamese are relying mostly on Russian stuff due to how cheap it is compared to anything in the West But with Russia more and more fked, China can now actually force Russia inti doing what they wanted Imagine they telling Russia, Vietnam is our enemy who we are currently invading.....stop giving them stuff Then......we fked
@jamiek17142 жыл бұрын
Interesting point.
@justicewbs Жыл бұрын
The K9 self-propelled Howitzers are serving India well in your border conflict with China
@kakaungranduomo2666 Жыл бұрын
Among the idiomatic expressions in Korea, there’s a saying, "Never be involved in others‘ house affair." Customer nation is literally just CUSTOMER. Give the goods and take money, that‘s it. Sellers don‘t need to know how or to whom customer gonna use the goods. None of their business. Such relationships are neat for each other.
@GungKrisna12 Жыл бұрын
So practically, no political strings attached
@arsevengumush3279 Жыл бұрын
Turkey is producing a version of this artillery under licence. Currently they are trying local power unit with additional electronics to increased firing speed and range.
@BrianHSC2 жыл бұрын
Forgot one important feature. Fully air conditioned.
@claudebylion9932 Жыл бұрын
Yes, but has it got a tea boiler for UK???
@JohnDoe-mx6xh Жыл бұрын
@@claudebylion9932 Turn off the A/C now everything boils 😂
@Terry0129 Жыл бұрын
The k9 also has a time-on target system(TOT). This is to fire three shots at different angles and drop three shots at the same time.
@David-by4jf10 ай бұрын
영어쓰면서 외국인인척 하지 말자 진짜 없어보이니까 ㅋㅋ
@Terry012910 ай бұрын
@@David-by4jf 외국인인척은 안했고 외국에서 오래 살고있는데 시비거는 이유가 뭐냐? 없어보일것도 없고,,;; 뭐 어쩌라고. 영어쓰면 안되? 니한테 내가 피해줬냐 진짜 ㅈㅂ신같네
@David-by4jf10 ай бұрын
@@Terry0129 외국인인척 영어 써서 마치 외국인들이 댓글 다는 것처럼 보이게 하는게 없어보인다고 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
@David-by4jf10 ай бұрын
@@Terry0129 마치 외국인들도 좋아한다라는걸 보여주기 위해서 영어 쓰는거 진짜 없어보여 ㅎㅎ
@Terry012910 ай бұрын
@@David-by4jf 한국에서 나가본적이 없어서 잘 모를수도 있겠지만 나 구글 영국 계정이라 영국에서 달린 댓글이 더 먼저 떠 이 채널 한국껀지도 몰랐는데 왜 니가 쥐랄임? 뭐가 그렇게 불편함?
@davidwood2911 Жыл бұрын
From David A. Wood: One should pay close attention when examining this admirably amazing, economic development. After the short, but brutally grinding Korean War (1950-1953), South Korea was a mortally depopulated, hugely damaged and mostly impoverished nation with very little heavy industry and only a meager amount of arable land, and as such, had to respectively import all of its military equipment and food supply from Western countries like the USA for decades. Now South Korea is not only the World's10th largest and thoroughly industrialized economy that is highly self-sufficient in supplying its national, nutrition needs, but the country is both comfortably affluent and extensively industrialized enough to do two things that are definite signs of an immensely wealthy and highly industrialized nation.That is, the South Koreans are alternately building home-made and first-rate military equipment for their vigilantly prepared and necessarily sizable armed forces on an appreciably large scale and actively selling the remainder, a lot of it, to friendly, foreign countries that are sufficiently able to pay for the South Korean-built, military equipment. This latter activity of bulk-sized, Military Arms Merchandising will eventually put fully-industrialized South Korea into direct competition with the hugely populated and monetarily wealthy country that is presently the World's No.#1 Arms Manufacturer/Arms Merchant, the USA, in the several years to come. Granted, it will be a long time from now, to be sure, but that time of the American Arms Industry having to ably compete with that of South Korea's is eventually going to come!
@ttrruaminpn57552 жыл бұрын
Wow that shot of field full of SPH blasting together would be hell for receiving end. That field full of guns are more than what many country has in their entire military and South Korea has 3000 of them. Jeez
@SpicyMaple Жыл бұрын
Lol frfr
@anti-Russia-sigma2 жыл бұрын
As the South Korea’s K9 Thunder bombards with shells & the K pop industry bombards with noise,we should surrender to South Korea.😁
@cruzada072 жыл бұрын
It got thunder in it's name now feel the thunder
@deniz_09092 жыл бұрын
turkey produced 460 t 155 storms under license ,and this year the new version of the storm 2 has started to enter the inventory and will most likely be produced until a total of 1000. Also, we used them actively in Syria, Iraq and Libya.
@kimj25702 жыл бұрын
Why many are buying K9s? Because Finns bought them first, and have been happy with them. Just used the option to full 96. We Finns are THE reference customer to have. Purchases are made tightly within budget. We buy only actually working weapon systems. Performance, price and supplier nation reliability within sphere of free world are our only criteria.
@0westdude Жыл бұрын
Poland has a huge order for 672 k9 thunders most to be made in Poland along with k2 black Panthers
@dlev Жыл бұрын
@@0westdude I am told Poland is building the world’s largest army
@GeeHanShin Жыл бұрын
Because it's the best in the market atm
@jamesdakrn Жыл бұрын
Also- bc Korea gets cold aas balls in the winter, especially within the mountain ranges on the eastern side of the peninsula (some winter days its as cold as Siberia) And bc also in the summer it gets hot and humid, it’s proven to work in cold and hot weather
@kimj2570 Жыл бұрын
@@dlev If not biggest, atleast overwhelmingly superior land army in Europe. Like 2 to 3 times stronger than anyone else. Polish have clearly decided that they aint never again going to be occupied by foreign power. All their aid to Ukraine nonwithstanding, they clearly measure their rearmament on worst case scenario where they are the main frontier country. In coming years countries like Poland, and my home country Finland, which are among few who are determined to take care of their own defence whatever the cost, asking allied support as second tier option, deserve much larger say over countries that only hesitate, dont get much of anything done, like Germany. NATO is military alliance, and capabilities must count. Even more should count blatant abandoment of maintaining defensive capability (especially at times of good economy), utter disregard of even basic realities of geopolitics = Germany again. With Finland joining NATO our Baltic neighbours breath more easily. There is now friendly heavyweight land power on BOTH ends of Baltic sea. We can always get fighter bombers doing sorties within NATO. Getting troops and tracks on the ground is much harder. Finns would take any Russian attempt to attack/threaten our blood relatives and little brother, Estonia, especially seriously.
@mattdoespushups23502 жыл бұрын
Ok i was feeling just aight about it but that automatic ammo transfer was actually very good ...
@Wüstenfuchs-x2b9 ай бұрын
The world's strongest self-propelled Howitzer that continues to be upgraded
@Dryadlis2 жыл бұрын
Not only Britain is intrest in K9A2, the 212 K9A1 wich Poland just command will be modernise to this standard with an additional 440 K9A2.
@Dryadlis2 жыл бұрын
@Z No it s not this. It s who will operate this wapoen.
@Dryadlis2 жыл бұрын
@Z I m jusz saying that the biggest problem for Poland is the lak of personnel.
@Kenny-yl9pc2 жыл бұрын
I really dont understand the reasoning behind it, because its dirt cheap or what?? It shoots 18 km and only 30 with rocket assisted munition thats not impressive I mean really not at all for any modern equipement. There are planty of better systems out there.
@Dryadlis2 жыл бұрын
@@Kenny-yl9pc ... What is you source?
@Kenny-yl9pc2 жыл бұрын
@@Dryadlis They said it in this video did you not listen kid? They said 18km with standard ammunition and 30 with rocket propelled munition. Which is not at all impressive. There are so many systems that have longer range with standard munition and can reach over 40km! So no this K9 system is not impressive or anything advanced for the modern day. Just compare it with other self propelled art systems range and youll see it yourself. The only reason that maybe someone chooses it is that its maybe doirt cheap but I cant imagine any other reason. Because it doesnt offer anything special or impressive technologically or in range. If its not cheap than it cant even offer that benefit, in that case its completley useless for any advanced industrial country. They dont need an inferior system like the K9. They can build better stuff themselfs. But maybe some 3rd world countries are interested becasue they aren capable of building even a system like the K9. But UK or US or any comparable country no they dont need any of that. They have better equipement and they can build even better ones themselfs! I say NO THANK YOU!
@FINNSTIGAT0R Жыл бұрын
I see what you did there, you said "finished" while there was a photo of a Finnish Army's K9 on screen 😀
@caesardicktator33012 жыл бұрын
Well, we finns have now about 49, propably more now those K9 Thunders, and our military is very pleased about those. And because insane leader behind our 1300 km border with russia...we need to to be ready if those idiots in russia starts attack our small country!! And because we were smart, we have now propably biggest artillery in the Europe...and it is very well trained! Wellcome to Finland you fooker russians!
@tarunchem70212 жыл бұрын
Nd How will Finns protect their howitzer from Low cost Iranian made Russian kamikaze drones ?
@raysubsonic2 жыл бұрын
@@tarunchem7021 the ones made with motorbike engines that you can detect from 40km away?
@JohnLee-db9zt2 жыл бұрын
@@raysubsonic lol ikr
@ROKASniper89 Жыл бұрын
As a Korean, I know what it is like to have an unstable neighbor. Glad those guns are keeping you safe too.
@chewbacca32696 ай бұрын
@tarunchem7021 Typically howitzer aren't supposed to be targeted by drones. If they are, then there is something wrong about their placement.
@kingpetra68862 жыл бұрын
Definitely an improvement over the US 155mm howitzer.
@cstgraphpads20912 жыл бұрын
I mean, considering it's several decades younger than the US version, I would hope it's an improvement.
@yosmch2 жыл бұрын
Is it really better with only 30km range? I do hope that the war in Ukrain has shown that 30km artillery is not enough anymore with the introduction of MLRS and HIMARS
@kingpetra68862 жыл бұрын
@@yosmch At one time, it was 15km. Why do you 'hope' that that the war in the Ukraine is 'not enough'.
@whyno7132 жыл бұрын
@@yosmch Excalibur dude, problem has been solved and is in use currently...
@AbhishekSingh-zv2tn2 жыл бұрын
@@yosmch you are right also considering weight m777 is very effective but both are of different class now its time of guided rocket mbls.
@orhankanal3167 Жыл бұрын
K9 A4. Obüs yeni versiyon insansız yeni kulesini 155.52 kalibre edilmiş kulesini enterge ettim. Tamamen kendine hedef kere atış yapan özelliği. Ve etkili mevzil 100km azmi mevzil 150km hedef kere atış 13 mermi atış yapma özelliği var
@hyun-872 жыл бұрын
틀린 정보가 있습니다. 연평도에서 전투를 치룬 것은 5사단이 아니라 해병대(MC) 입니다. 5사단은 내륙에 위치한 철원에 있습니다. 사망자는 병사 2명 민간인 2명입니다.
@loveaintfree1409 Жыл бұрын
한국말로 하면 저 사람이 이해함 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ
@hyun-87 Жыл бұрын
@@loveaintfree1409 유튜브 모바일에 번역기가 달려 있습니다...ㅋㅋㅋㅋ
@진완-c9x2 жыл бұрын
k9 maximum range 54km(k315 shell)
@jimpark83796 ай бұрын
The K9 is a great weapon but let's give credit where it's due. The powerpack is a German engine and American Allison transmission, which has a bulletproof reputation and are top notch. The K9 is an improved version of USA's M109 Paladin, which is also an excellent howitzer. In fact, before making the K9, Korea made a licensed M109 dubbed the K55 and there's still 1,000 of those K55 in service. What separates the K9 is that it's as good as or comparable to everything else out there, it's extremely reliable, and it costs 2x to 3x less.
@김시원-d1bАй бұрын
Doesn't use German powerpack since september batch, now equipped with newly developed Korean one. Still uses Allison transmission tho 😊
@jimpark8379Ай бұрын
@김시원-d1b Yes, they developed a native Korean engine because the Germs have export restrictions. My understanding is Korea spent a ton of money to develop an engine that was 5% more fuel efficient so they can export the K9 to Middle East countries. Really, the Germs shouldn't be so difficult because it's made us replace their engines in the K2 tank and K9 howitzer. And they lost licensing fees.
@jongminyu97462 жыл бұрын
Performance(S~A), Price (SS), AS(S), Compatibility with Nato and US army (S)
@domnikoli2 жыл бұрын
hanwha techwin made my security cameras lol
@마르마름2 жыл бұрын
판매량이 말해준다 그리고 끊임없이 업그레이드 해준다
@edesa87352 жыл бұрын
가성비로 따라올 무기가 없고 막굴려도 문제없이 할거 다 하니까 전세계 어딜가도 꿀릴거 없을 정도의 성능과 능력 만땅임. 많이 많이 사주세요~
@HKim00722 жыл бұрын
Diversification of equipment between allied defense contractors is smart. BAE systems makes the new US version. Germany has a manufacturer for its mobile (long German name) howitzer and UK has another.
@imanengineer102 жыл бұрын
1 PzH2000 price = 4X K9 thunder + 1X K10 ARV And there is an error. All parts of K-9 and K-10's hull and turret armor is 35mm RHA minimum.
@Yuki_Ika72 жыл бұрын
Impressive!
@przecie3856 Жыл бұрын
Poland give his version of K-9 to Ukraine and they liked.. service is easy and big repair ( exchange) of 52cal armat can be done in short time because of spears parts.👍👍 PzH2000 is problematic and Germany refused to do services 👎🇩🇪💩🇩🇪👎 If you not manufacturing company better not buy this from Deutschland 👎👎👎
@mughug96162 жыл бұрын
What are the finance terms like for a K9 over 10 years?
@trstnhn2 жыл бұрын
Depends on your credit score and trade-in value. Which tank will you be trading in for the K9?
@CP-282 жыл бұрын
At 3:55 OK, I'm sold!
@francischo18922 жыл бұрын
welcome to arsenal of free world
@bangdoll45002 жыл бұрын
Correcting incorrect information. The armament capabilities of the K9 are as follows: 18km(M107, HE) 30km(M549A1, HE-RAP) 36km(K310, DP-ICMBB) 40km(K307, HEBB) 55km(K315, HE-RAP) 100km(Gliding Guided Artillery Munition - GGAM In development, the prototype is completed, Similar to M982) The SPH, which has a distance of less than 40 km on the modern battlefield, is meaningless.
@avalonLT2 жыл бұрын
100km?! That crazy, even futher than himars.
@chibonchibon39672 жыл бұрын
Taiwan need this
@samnelson38527 ай бұрын
Samsung also makes refrigerators and vacuums!
@onetruekeeper2 жыл бұрын
Shoot and scoot capability.
@peter4862 жыл бұрын
because its a sick system that is fine tune for one thing :)
@youngmoon87622 жыл бұрын
best base reliable model, can be added optional equipment design chage for the customers request. quick delivery, wide versatile, allowed local production. Cost? not really important. why don't you buy Chinese one?
@YPO62 жыл бұрын
Do these get latest Samsung One UI 5.0?
@gamernoob1742 жыл бұрын
Must be cuz it made my Samsung
@청솔향-g9u5 ай бұрын
Ultimately, the answer is simple: you can paint the border in a relatively short period of time!
@feltwedge2 жыл бұрын
HE M107 18 KM range with a 52 caliber barrel is worse than the 39 caliber M777 and M198. I wonder why.
@hussar8432 жыл бұрын
it's cheap and good :D
@gokusupersaiya80672 жыл бұрын
my front gate install this things, now my neighbour built china wall
@Bbhai242 жыл бұрын
Nice technology
@lmvcnn2 жыл бұрын
K9 was part of Samsung, look forward to buy Toyota or Nissan howitzer
@deliabartlett30762 жыл бұрын
Love the name, K9……”Cry ‘Havoc’ and let slip the dogs of war..”
@LeadingInnovations6 күн бұрын
Panzerhaubitze 2000 only needs 2 men for operation... Check and mate...
@misterbaiter57532 жыл бұрын
It's so good even North Korea is ordering it.
@PankajkumarOraon2 жыл бұрын
Still afraid of Nuke baby
@jopiaspieder11842 ай бұрын
I want these for my nation
@AdamBechtol2 жыл бұрын
What bizarre narration. "against" "deserts" Though the AI quality has only a few years left, maybe not even, until it's indistinguishable.
@raysubsonic2 жыл бұрын
Agreed. The vast major of the narration is meaningless.
@dwarkaprasadsharma6462 жыл бұрын
इन सबसे बेहतर है Long range MBRL ( Multi barrel Rocket Launcher)
@ProsecutionaccCusomsChennai-VI4 ай бұрын
India has K9 bro.......Cool
@nameless_no_name9 ай бұрын
Long range at a fraction of the cost of Euro options
@frankschmidt23038 ай бұрын
Looks like the Swedish bandvagn 1
@heromail29032 жыл бұрын
This howitzer is excellent at repelling Russian armed forces which wreac havoc around the world
@michaeldoxey12405 ай бұрын
A $100 drone will wipe it out. Star Wars/Drone Wars, it's the future!
@aigumoney2 жыл бұрын
because S.Korea deployed 1200 K-9s in Korea. It can be cheap. and "supply chain" isn't bad. K-9 bas been sold many to several countries. sum of them is around 1000. even include Poland. .. did I say S.Korea deployed 1200 K-9s? oh yeah. I did. that's why K-9 can be cheap. it is sad fact. not proud. S.Korea has been still in the cold war but the others hasn't.
@kimj2570 Жыл бұрын
I didnt quite understand. Sad fact being South Korea has been still with Cold War? What that does mean?
@GoogIe_UK Жыл бұрын
@@kimj2570 South Korea is still at war with North Korea. However, they signed a ceasefire in 1953, so there are no longer any attacks on each other. A lot of time has passed since then, so many foreigners are not aware of this. The Korean War was a truce, not an end
@kookie175 Жыл бұрын
@@GoogIe_UK indeed. many people who doesn't hasn't read up on the Korean War thinks the war has ended when in actual fact both countries are technically still at war in the present.
@gorethegreat2 жыл бұрын
Wow !!
@internetpeople61136 ай бұрын
Is Ukraine using this?
@Aetemaad42 жыл бұрын
extreme
@구연이-s9p2 жыл бұрын
아마 전자동 기계식이라서 ?! 실제 폭탄 무개는 엉청나다 ! 폭탄 무개 들어 올리는 순간, 뼈마디가 내려 앉는다. .
@shinshin3672 жыл бұрын
cost performance
@dobrin31067 ай бұрын
suamsung cooked on that one
@kelvinbritz90512 жыл бұрын
Can you do a show on Russia's thermobaric munition, like the one they used in kherson this week?
@dabda85102 жыл бұрын
TIL South Korea has long range guided rocket with thermobaric warhead. They can be launched from K239.
@deyangxie1362 жыл бұрын
millimeter / millimetre is not spelled millimiter
@rajumohan93362 жыл бұрын
RAJUMOHAN PRESS 💯💯💯💯🌍🇮🇳🇮🇳🙏👌👌👌👍👍
@ariffadam8540 Жыл бұрын
I hope Malaysia government would buy it. Hope it's air-conditioned.
@mheekkim290111 ай бұрын
It is :)
@dhodzespinosa34092 жыл бұрын
Here In Philippines..we have K10.. K10 or C10 short for KAYETAN-10 LIBO..
@formacionG132 жыл бұрын
I still dont understand the difference between this and a tank. Am military dumb
@ScorpionMinds2 жыл бұрын
The Thunder is a mobile Artillery platform for long range support fire with thin armor while a tank like the M1A1 or Leopard A7 etc. are better armored and more for suitable for close combat environments with a 105mm Gun and ranges of up to 5-10 km.
@formacionG132 жыл бұрын
@@ScorpionMinds ok. More like one is for range while the other for closed combat. Is that what your saying?
@hishot10782 жыл бұрын
MBT (main battle tank) is for close fight, armor vs armor, while SPH (self-propelled howiter) is for indirect fire support.
@saff33562 жыл бұрын
@@ScorpionMinds you mean 120mm gun
@DEVILFISH11222 жыл бұрын
@@formacionG13 the thunder is basically an artillery platform that’s highly mobile, it’s gun traverse is a lot more than a tanks, and is designed for long range accurate fire missions that a tanks guns could never match
@videoforum40472 жыл бұрын
Suomi finland perkele
@L3_FR2 жыл бұрын
Extrem pOwer - militaryTV, 1000bc, probably.
@Sophocles13 Жыл бұрын
I'm so confused by these narrators... they have flawless American accents but they sound like they're reading really bad translations/ can't pronounce certain words... what's the deal?
@jwc3104 Жыл бұрын
It's basically an updated PzH 2000 at 1/3 of the price.
@jonny2954 Жыл бұрын
PZH 2000 is still better stat-wise, just more expensive.
@hwangjake52212 жыл бұрын
가성비
@martinblank14842 жыл бұрын
The title question isn't even answered....waste of time...👎
@sunilmotwani8982 Жыл бұрын
12123456 fire
@geoffworsnop57262 жыл бұрын
Atmos 2000 still the beast
@russell74892 жыл бұрын
Skip to the very end for only info that makes the most recent variant still in development game changing albeit at even more complexity, but as we have seen in Ukraine, it appears hi tech and complexity DOES out do quantity, so. Otherwise this is the worst mil tech review I've ever seen.
@jeffarchibald38372 жыл бұрын
How is it that Korea is taking the lead in artillery and tank systems when we Americans spend trillions on defense? We are getting ripped off by US arms companies. Also we spent trillions defending Korea for 70 years while they saved money to do this. Time to leave Korea, they can defeat the north easily without us. Kudos to Korea for these brilliant systems.
@mgtowski3952 жыл бұрын
1. US taxpayers are getting ripped off by arms companies 2. Korea pays the US for defense costs 3. Korea buys a bunch of USA made weapons 4. Korea supported USA in Vietnam, Iraq, and other places and projects
@llIlIlllIllllIlIl2 жыл бұрын
The reason Americans are here is because of the China. The beggers in the cold fields are nothing.
@jeffarchibald38372 жыл бұрын
@@llIlIlllIllllIlIl Due to Korean topography even China couldn't due anything rapid. If they did killing a few thousand US soldiers won't matter. If Korea wants them to stay let then pay the cost in full, including pensions etc. We have propped up Korea for too long.
@gglee462 жыл бұрын
If the U.S. gives up its check on China, it will be possible to withdraw U.S. troops from South Korea. But will the U.S. be just watching China grow?
@dingchavez19602 жыл бұрын
Whoa there, that's a lot of oversimplified Trumpist speak. There are lots of reasons for the things you're talking about. You're not wrong, you're just oversimplifying by a lot, and knowing some details could get you thinking deeper, whether or not you keep wanting the US military off Korea. Just read up, it's interesting. Anyways, the real money drain isn't stationing troops in Korea, it's all the free-world countries giving all their jobs to China. If it continues, we are all doomed. Think about it, we've all made China the Amazon/Walmart of the world and the rest of us are high-ticket specialty shops. Stupidest thing ever.
@2ndbut3rd5 ай бұрын
Samsung 💀
@SemiPro_Nub2 жыл бұрын
Me, a World of Tanks blitz player : “oof! 19mm armour. HE rounds from the Panther I would pass through like butter.”
@youngmoon87622 жыл бұрын
yeh..but 155mm can destroy you even it not hit you. it will flip your tank like a Turtle even it hit the ground near you.
@SemiPro_Nub2 жыл бұрын
@@youngmoon8762 Panther I was a highly mobile medium Tank. K9 is a Tank artillery. Big difference. K9 long reload time and not very mobile when compared to a Panther I. Would be similar to a real world modern version of the British FV215b 183. Except the 215b has a 183mm gun. It is a Tank destroyer. Also, Panther I was a Nazi German Tank not currently in use by any military. You can find them in museums. And no, on 1v1 scenarios, No medium tanks will come even close to “flip your tank like a Turtle” against it. In fact, it will get HE’d. Prediction, 1st shot miss (k9) and then boom! Just like the FV 215b 183
@Absilon132 жыл бұрын
This is almost same as krab only difference is the chasis is of korean made but the turret design is british altered/ augmented by poland.
@johntexas74932 жыл бұрын
Cheaper and western standard
@jonathanthink58302 жыл бұрын
when i saw samsung....... it reminds me of my leaky washing machine ..... :-)
@ThePearsson2 жыл бұрын
It’s bad ass, but i would choose the Swedish Archer system from BAE. 7 rounds in 9 seconds and more agile.
@ShinbeKiyawara2 жыл бұрын
Archer and K9 is different beast. Wheeled vs tracked. Many country prefer tracked vehicle for a reason.
@cstgraphpads20912 жыл бұрын
7 rounds in 9 seconds only in ideal conditions.
@Ch1maera2 жыл бұрын
The archer is probably better for countries with more flatlands. Since its wheeled but for countries like korea which is around 70% mountainous terrain wheeled vehicles are inferior to tracked vehicles.
@raysubsonic2 жыл бұрын
1 Archer with all auxilary systems would probably cost double the cost of a K9. The K9 is hands down the most common self-propelled howitzer on the planet. By now there's probably more of these operating in more militaries than Palladins.
@picszoid45292 жыл бұрын
K9 Bajra
@reptarbun2 жыл бұрын
I was a k9 crew member... I hate this thing. Yeah it's cool... but you would also hate it if you've ever had to do maintenance on this monstrosity...
@박주영-u5b2 жыл бұрын
필요없음 안사면될거아냐!!!!! 한국의 주력 K9 욕하지말고 당신들나라에는 있는지나 확인해보쇼! 우린 자체개발한K9입나다.