Why Soviet WW2 Boots were used for 72 years

Get 20% off Every Man Jack with code ROSE20 here www.everymanjack.com/?... Thanks again, I actually use these products every day.
Rose Anvil Limited Edition Email List - forms.gle/Q6osghGZ99WirJgb9
VIDEOS MENTIONED:
Japanese WW2 boot review - • You’ve never seen a bo...
British WW2 boot review - • Why 80 yr old British ...
German WW2 boot review - • Why "German Army" love...
American WW2 boot review - • Are 77 Year Old WW2 Bo...
Red Wing 1907 moc toe boot review - • BEFORE YOU BUY - Red W...
Nicks Indestructible boot review - • Never Trust a Fart or ...
Historical Military full playlist - • Historical Military Bo...
ROSE ANVIL EMAIL LISTS:
Limited Edition - forms.gle/Q6osghGZ99WirJgb9
ROSE ANVIL LINKS:
WEBSITE - roseanvil.com/collections
INSTAGRAM - / rose_anvil
PATREON - / roseanvil
CREDIT:
British Pathe Footage - • Soviet troops battle i...
British Pathe Russian troops enter Berlin - • Russians Enter Berlin:...
HistoryAtWar Battle of Stalingrad footage - • WW2: Battle Of Staling...
Sillu Red Army at War footage - • Red Army WW2 Footage HD
SovietBoots.com - www.sovietboots.com/blog/?p=223
Epic Soviet Documentaries history of Combat Boots - • History of Combat Boot...
TIMESTAMPS:
0:00 Intro
0:32 History
4:42 Better Than Leather
5:55 Puncture Tests
6:20 Construction
8:54 Cut In Half
10:21 Reveal/ Japanese Reproduction Info
11:08 Review
11:29 The Worst of WWII?
13:02 Why I cut this boot
13:46 Final Thoughts
#ww2 #historicalfacts

[@RoseAnvil]

Get 20% off Every Man Jack with code ROSE20 here: www.everymanjack.com/?Rose+Anvil&KZbin

[@stauker.1960]

Props to them for willing to be at the end of the video. That face lotion sounds nice

[@danielhorvath2579]

​@@joeybaseball7352 It's shown in the statistics

[@crookim]

You're not looking at why they needed a light water proof boot, the kind of muddy wet ground that the Soviets were fighting demanded those specs

[@danielhorvath2579]

@@joeybaseball7352 well, i see somewhere. Maybe its in the KZbin studio application

[@RoseAnvil]

@@joeybaseball7352 you’re off on this one, there is a detailed “audience retention” graph that helps us creators see what parts of the video people watch. KZbin doesn’t talk much about it so most people haven’t heard of it.

[@OlegLyutov]

The officers had leather jack boots. Kirza boots were for the lower ranks. Either kind of these boots were worn without socks. Instead of socks each foot would be wrapped with a strip of linen or cotton fabric in a such way that would make these boots quite comfortable to wear. When part of the fabric strip gets wet from sweat, the foot gets rewrapped so the dry end wraps around the foot while the wet end is wrapped around the crus to dry out. Due to water resistance, these boots could also be used as a vessel.

[@Dulya_with_poppy]

​@Kelly Harbeson носки у нас умели шить, даже при советах, просто это настолько плохая обувь, что если носить её с носками вместо портянок, ноги превратятся в фарш, это такая советская магия

[@juslitor]

Can only imagine what those rags smelled like after being pinned down in Stalingrad for a month or two.

[@justsomeguy5470]

​@@juslitor oof

[@WolfShadowhill]

I collect Soviet stuff and do reenactment, the foot wraps are more of a thick flannel material and make these boots actually pretty comfortable to wear, in fact I’ll use these when shoving snow in the winter and with wool socks and foot wraps theses stay nice and warm and work great

[@alexkastano96]

@@juslitor they can be washed and dry in 15 minutes if you know how.

[@13oz.M0u53]

When I was a soldier in 1987 - 1989, I wore such boots. At first they seemed uncomfortable to me and rubbed my feets. Around the spring of 1988, we were given high-laced boots. Having tried all the options, we returned to the old boots. These boots are not hot in summer and not cold in winter, they do not get wet in the rain. Until now, somewhere on the balcony I have a pair of such boots.

[@Kairat1969]

Взадницу кирзу, служил в тоже время, испортилсебе ступни.

[@miwkins]

@@user-px1ml2og8u а если Залужный перемогу не организует, то какие планы на 24й? Просто радi любопытства.

[@miwkins]

​@@user-px1ml2og8u как-то некрасиво называть свою страну улусом, Володимир, но на вопрос-то вы так i не ответили? если вдруг? то какие планы на 24й-то?

[@sjoormen1]

how are they on hard surface, rocks,.. etc?

[@Radbot776]

@@sjoormen1they are good boots, and last a long time. It takes feet time to get used to them. When starting military service, sudden everyday use the city boys that never wore boots would have finger nails come off, pieces of skin rub off, bloody feet and was a nightmare. This was the boot of the villages and a lot of people working dirty jobs.

[@wolfdima]

I used those Kirza boots in the Army in early 90s. We had plenty of modern boots, but used Kirza for some daily work and duty in the fields. To say the least, I was amazed how comfortable and practical they were when you work in trenches, dirt, high grass and similar environments. Especially when you know how to use it with footcloth. Also, despite simplicity, those boots had a lot of killer features - they were light, reliable, easy to maintain, protected and stabilized the foot and it was super-easy to keep your feet dry. Only best tactical boots with modern lacing and Goretex can compete with them. So I understand why Kirza boots were used for more than a century.

[@runescripter2]

Мне тоже довелось носить кирзу с портянкой после берцев и носков, и честно говоря, возвращаться к берцам после этого не хотелось совершенно, а особенно возвращаться к вонючим носкам) В кирзу можно быстро вкинуться и быстро их снять при необходимости ( что не раз пригождалось в наряде)). Единственный минус у кирзы, что я выявил - в них неудобно бегать и маневрировать, они тяжелее берцев. Во всем остальном - одни плюсы

[@N00dle3ffect]

I love how he adds the entire history around the boots. Makes me super interested in history!

[@Plague_Doc22]

As someone who knows quite a bit about WW2 and really enjoy reading about it. The boots is something I never thought about learning about.

[@Lupine.]

​@@Plague_Doc22 The focus is usually on the footwraps, so the boots are easy to overlook.

[@will-o-the-wisp-witch]

@TastingHistory is a good channel here on KZbin

[@MrBalrogos]

looks like he completley skipped part where russia with germany attack poland and russia with germany were allies with plan to split lands called ribbetropp molotow. And then they occupied my country to 1993 where for rest of the world war end in 1945.

[@Lupine.]

@@will-o-the-wisp-witch And everyone's favorite: Weird History

[@vladimir945]

My father was an officer in the Soviet army in 1980-s, he said that although officers were issued cooler full-leather boots, many of them would still prefer kirza boots for being lighter. He brought a few pairs home, I would occasionally wear them when doing chores around our village house - didn't like them much, mostly because the "shoe" part was completely stiff, and putting them on was giving me some kind of "foot claustrophobia" (e. g. the feeling that I maybe shouldn't put my foot into that, because it's unclear whether I will be able to get it back out). I didn't bother with footwraps, would just put several cotton socks on each foot, and then a thick wool sock on top of that if the weather was cold.

[@Eduardo_Espinoza]

Do they smell like eggs?

[@januszkurahenowski2860]

@@Eduardo_Espinoza This version did not contain egg so why would it smell like egg?

[@vladimir945]

@@Eduardo_Espinoza No, not at all.

[@secularnevrosis]

I have 2 different versions? One pair looks just like the ones in the video, the other are not "flat" over the toes but has more space over them. Use them in the winter driving my tractor and when driving motorcycles. I fixed the "nail problem" with a pair of thick wool soles. You are right. The rubber gets a bit stiff and slippery after a couple of decades.

[@gunnar7333]

I served in 2010, in the military registration and enlistment office we were given military boots along with a uniform. During the first week of the "young fighter course" in the military unit, some guys wore their legs very badly, and then we were given kirza boots with footcloths, my legs felt so blissful then that I still remember it, how great it was compared to high-top boots and socks = )

[@user-lv5dh8ot4n]

В керзовом сапоге у тебя бы давно стерлась нога

[@billietyree2214]

This was very interesting to me. My mother was employed by The Florsheim Shoe Company in Chicago, Illinois when WWII ended, and she told me that on the day they were informed that the war in Europe was over, that the manager of the factory was upset that his contracts would be canceled. He was not too popular with the ladies working there who had family members fighting in that war.

[@LorikQuinn]

That's just the nature of war under capitalism, it's not about survival (most of the times), it's all about supplying the government and leeching away the tax money from everyone else, even the guys getting killed out there to keep you safe.

[@Manco65]

No kidding....now of the war production factories where my mother worked she never mentioned that one. Just Motorola and we'll Precious Metal? Or something where she made machine gun mounts for bombers. And she had three brothers in the service. In WW-2.

[@iangarrett741]

I heard a story of a Soviet soldier who got boots two sizes too big. His comrades thought he was mad, and a pain in the *** in the rain when he would get stuck in the mud. However, come the winter, he stuffed his boots with newspaper and had the warmest feet in the regiment.

[@vadimanreev4585]

Normal practice. Usually they took a size larger, not two. If the boots are two sizes too big, then you will knock your legs off.

[@CrimsonSoldat1311]

Yep, I have a pair of 80s model officer boots, one and a half size bigger, i put height insoles, plus thicker socks. So warm and comfier and easier to walk on.

[@Nikita_Random]

I remember wearing one of these in 2011, while serving in the army. Mine hade a glued on sole, and most of the guys from my squad changed their combat boots for this type of footwear, as it fits better for the hot climate. Also, you can easily take them off while having a break on a speed march, what made them really popular among soldiers. Thanks for the video!

[@MsZsc]

are you out now?

[@Nikita_Random]

@@MsZsc yes, I was out almost a decade ago.

[@MsZsc]

@@Nikita_Random that's good

[@peterwilson5528]

I was in the British military in the 1980s and 1990s our military and our boots were pretty good. I married an Estonian woman and used to do work at their country house on the property in Tabasalu, Estonia. I used a pair of those Russian boots and they were really quality items hard wearing and superbly comfortable. The quality of the leather and lining was just excellent. I totally understand why they would have kept them that style and for so long.

[@timrutkevich3222]

I wore those shoes in Soviet Army at the end of 1980's. It is not just a boot. IT is the whole system of tightly wrapped around a foot piece of cloth, called Portianka. If your foot gets wet or sweaty you can wrap your foot with the another side, while wet part dries as you continue walking. When you sleep, you wrap the cloth around the boot and let it and the boot dry up. Becides the lighter weight, you don't have to worry about socks to carry spares. As per fire resistance, It never even crossed my mind, as it never been a problem. Last, these boots saved lots of lives, as it takes split second to put them on, no shoe laces to worry, no socks to put, just put a cloth over the boot and slide the foot into the boot. Cheap and light does not mean it is bad, it did the job it was designed for. And I completely disagree with western and German propaganda that Soviet leaders just threw the bodies at any problem. It is especially very visible when Soviet union started war against Japan. With relatively few troops Red Army was way more successful in destroying Japanese Imperial Army that was occupying China, Korea, Sakhalin and Kurils

[@dxq3647]

Respect to you, my friend. The USSR steamedrolled the Japanese in Manchuria while the US were struggling with their island hop. The west tends to attribute "throwing bodies" to anyone they don't like.

[@borghorsa1902]

Soviet losses and USA losses speak volume about two different battle philosophies - USSR lost 10x more

[@borghorsa1902]

@@dxq3647 USSR lost 10x more. Look at Russian invasion into Ukraine, Russ fight like Russo-Finnish war

[@timrutkevich3222]

@@borghorsa1902 Until you look at the details and compare apples to apples. Against Japan Americans lost way more troops while fighting for just a few islands in Pacific. uSSR defeated largest, industrial area in Manchuria which had largest Japanese Force. USSR Red Army lost most troops in 1941-1942. At the time when German Army was the strongest and most capable. Yes lots of losses killed, taken POWs. The largest losses were due to criminal treatment of Soviet POWs. It is the established fact that for German troops Eastern front was the same thing Bakhmut was to Ukranian troops

[@MeesNukk]

Spot on about the propaganda narrative. The whole video reeks of historical illiteracy.

[@MrKaido93]

It was reported that when Russia switched from the Kirza jackboot to the low lace-up boots the General officers were quoted as saying, "Wait until the spring floods come the soldiers will wish they had Kirza boots".

[@ljoe7038]

I wore those boots during my militeraized service (emercom) in years 2002-2005, as an old colleague gave me his old style boots which were too small for him and told me not to wear the new-style boots with laces. I was very satisfied, as I could put them on in a second during the night shifts and could come into rather deep water or mud with them. I used to climb, jog and jump in these boots without any problems. do not see any problems in using these boot with the tissue instead of socks. cheers from Russia!

[@exexpat11]

I owned the East German copies (basically the same boots issued to East Germany from the 50's to the 80's). They were fairly indestructible, hard on your feet with or without socks, waterproof. Very plain outside of them being high boots.

[@vasiliypoopkeen7954]

the standart is footcloths, not socks )) . Try it, it is far better.

[@exexpat11]

@@vasiliypoopkeen7954 I actually tried the wrap and socks and bare feet. Socks and the wrap was similar.

[@MrKaido93]

The East German Army , the NVA used Leather boots for the conscripts that were essentially copies of the March Jackboots for the lower enlisted personnel and the cadre NCO's and Officers had slightly taller leather boots.

[@exexpat11]

@@MrKaido93 The ones from Sportsman's Guide East German Surplus boots were identical to the Russian boots with the cotton canvas coated type material.

[@MrKaido93]

@exexpat11 Those from the Sportsman's Guide were not genuine, not the real deal. I know I wore the real deal in the Estonian Defense Forces in the early 1990's

[@Johnson_2022]

These boots, at least for me, make for encredably good work and walking boots particularly for the price. There aren't many places where you can get knee high boots with durable soles in for $80. They are also encredably comfortably when you use footwraps with them since in my experience they fill out the boot better and allow sweat to wick away alot easier.

[@ljoe7038]

right you are

[@lazzie7495]

Where do you get these kinds of boots?

[@Johnson_2022]

@@lazzie7495 I got mine from a Russian military surplus site. It's one of the first results you get when you type it Google. They use European sizing rather than the Soviet one to be clear.

[@Timsturbs]

want to add footwrap material plays a big role, it should be thick soft cotton preferably with wool, like flannel

[@Johnson_2022]

@@Timsturbs indeed, although linen works very well too for more tropical environments. I use the German method that is cotton footwraps with wool socks for most conditions. The wool sock providing warmth and the foot wraps for durability.

[@svetko05]

It might be on the lower side of reliability and quality, but if they really are lighter and more waterproof than the other boots, I'd take them. Having wet feet at war times, especially in the Russian winter, is life threatening. And having to walk with heavy boots packed with snow or mud is extremely fatiguing, considering the huge distances the soldier had to walk during the later stages of the war.

[@jackmacfakie1387]

Tend to agree. The comments section reveals they were worn with footwraps and not socks and so I presume that helped solve the insulation issue to an extent as well.

[@user-ns3rm8vj8d]

@@jackmacfakie1387 портянки носили вместо носков как более надежное средство, так как носки в таких сапогах, да и вообще в сапогах снашиваются буквально за 2 часа. Занимался в свое время военно исторической реконструкцией РККА, ходил и в ботинках кожаных с обмотками и сапогах кожаных и кирзовых, кирзовые сапоги наиболее универсальны.

[@mickvonbornemann3824]

In the Soviet Army frostbite was a criminal offence in WWII, it meant being derelict in following ones training

[@robertsloan2877]

I wish you would have elaborated more on Portyanki. Theyre a really important part of the usage and identity of these boots.

[@petesheppard1709]

Lars (Survival Russia) has some good videos, where he points out how they can be better than socks!

[@robertsloan2877]

@@petesheppard1709 Yeah. Portyanki are awesome. I've been hiking and bushcrafting in these boots for a few years, i definitely see the Kirza above the leather tearing at some point but they've been amazing boots. If they break I'll just get another pair. They don't feel cheap or poorly made, but easily replacing them if they were damaged was part of the whole reason why they were designed the way they were to be mass produced. They're great boots. They fill the role well and if they break, replace them and keep going lol I'd rather wear these over riding boots or muck boots any day. They're too much fun. They feel really nice too. And I've jogged in them before and they don't feel bad at all. They're just different.

[@adumbratus4148]

The German soldiers preferrred "Fußlappen" over socks too.

[@robertsloan2877]

@@adumbratus4148 Yeah. Fußlappen are awesome

[@MrSloika]

My father served in the Yugoslav Army in the early 1950s. He told me they were issued socks and foot-wraps. They used the socks while on base but when they were out in the field they used the foot-wraps. My father claimed that when foot-wraps were properly used you could march for miles and never get a blister.

[@Robert53area]

As a person that has 3 pairs of these boots. They are very durable all weather boots, and great for outdoors and even horse riding. Down side, they do take very long to break in and can be very uncomfortable at first. But with proper boot socks and time it becomes very comfortable. The water proof quality of the boot is what is the most important factor to me. And light weight. Weight equals lbs, lbs quality pain. Having a water proof boot is far better to have in Eastern Europe too as most of eastern Europe is a bog, swamp and hill grassland. So I wouldn't say it is a bad boot, it is a great boot for the area it is designed. You want a light boot in a bog and swamp as it is easier to get out of mud versus a heavy boot.

[@secularnevrosis]

I think they work great when riding motorcycles. And, as you say, they keep water away for a long time. They are easy to dry too!

[@dalentalas]

You wear them with socks, not foot wraps as is proper?! You /heretic/!

[@user-jc4pw3hb6g]

Что ты такое несёшь, чёрт возьми !? "Большая часть это болото и трясина" процентов 20 это большая часть !?

[@edgarcardiel157]

I do wwii soviet reenacting and i can guarantee these boots are quite comfortable and versatile. With footwraps they fit quite snug and are easy to repair as im a cobbler and have torn a few open

[@pauljackubowski8237]

same here, one event i was stuck in a stream for 10-15 mins. my feet stayed bone dry. much better than my usgi boots lol

[@ltpowell]

As reenactor who got his hands on british, american and russian kits i can tell with full confidence - boots from all sides have their own strenghs and weaknesses. Soviet jackboots so far lightests and waterproof. American - most comfortable. British - you can go on any dangerous and slippery surface and not fall - nails will chew into anything.

[@user-tc9sk4ei9y]

I remember my military training - one of our guys got a foot blister, whose old school boots were the only thing which could help him stay mobile

[@NMiller_]

I love looking at historical trade offs like this. Seeing what decisions were made and why, and ultimately the outcomes of those choices. We can learn so much from seeing what has already been tried. Thank you for doing these sorts of videos.

[@robertduluth8994]

He was wrong about the human wave tactics kzbin.info/www/bejne/lWildmt5qLJsmtU

[@Madfox169]

Thank you. I used to wear KIRza combat boots when I was I kid, it is very bad in the cold weather. But they were nearly indestructible. Also you the army “became” red only after 1017 revolution, befor that it was just a Russian army :) thumbs up!

[@mEDIUMGap]

In a cold weather you need to replace footwraps with a warm ones

[@sasasasa-lx6cl]

My first pair of kirza boots was with LEATHER heel. It was 1987 BTW. After initial break-in period they were quite comfortable, if heavy, and careful wrapping of the foot was not necessary - simply place foot wrap on top and push your foot in (socks are necessary for this trick). After 4 months in boot camp and training center I upgraded them to officer version (all-leather, shorter, lighter, rubber sole) and woolen socks since it was far North and we were Navy after all :). Logically working boots (called gady) should be issued to sailors instead of jackboots but I newer got mine. Instead I purchased extra pair of dress boots and was wearing them with socks when on shore. On board everybody was wearing legendary perforated submarine slippers :)

[@elFulberto]

Is it true that those perforated submarine slippers were introduced in the navy only after an admiral visited a ship, promptly slipped and cracked his head open?

[@user-rw7ud5st4g]

Служил с 1986 по 88 года, Кирзачи -самая лучшая обувь!!! Находились в тундре - носили при температуре до -50 градусов! Сапоги и две пары портянок и все окей! Потом были в Казахстане при +45 -50 градусов тепла ,одна пара тонких портянок и все окей! КаКИЕ БОТИНКИ? Все они не удобны их надо разнашивать,у кого-то стопа широкая, у кого-то подьем стопы высокий и все этого дико не удобно, отсюда мозоли, натертости и тд ... А Кирзачи одел с портянками и лепота!!! Попробуйте в своих ботинках одеться за 45 секунд!!! Есть у меня сейчас ботиночки от фирмы 5.11 и, что вы думаете? Ну супер просто тащусь - две стельки ,одна пласмассовая другая мягкая ,повторяе форму ноги - ну супер! Одел,был таким довольным пока через час ходьбы не натер на одной ноге мозоль на пятке!!! Сначало не мог понять причину, а потом увидел,что на пядке обуви где проходит шов ниток - получился бугорок из ниток и теперь что не делал все за зря, трет ногу и все! Вот вам и крутая обувь - 150 евро на ветер !!!

[@jeromekammerer4733]

Ah yes the famous myth of USSR, just throwing bodies at the enemy until victory. Truly the height of ww2 knowledge.

[@nemo5335]

the Kirza is great because you can make a bigass jack boot which is perfect for the deep snow and mud you will often run into in Russia, but it's not excessively heavy.

[@CarolusR3x]

I'm surprised that you never mentioned the footwraps and how socks weren't used with kirza boots!

[@user-us8vq7gn8f]

My greatgrandfather wore his own, self made leather boots in ww2 and this situation was quite common.Soviet people in this days make many things by they own hands. If they need something on the front, and army have no suplies, they made it! If the take bad items they make them beter, upgrade it. Greatgrandfather can make boots, horse harness, even wooden house, etc etc

[@Matuss101]

I do little bit of "airsoft reenactment" and I wore these during the 5 hour game in melting snow and ankle deep mud, a lot of running, jumping around, in total I ran 7km with it. I had telogrejka- watnik uniform, socks and footwraps( the footwraps were too small so I had to wear socks also) and I was amazed how waterproof they are. Normaly during games I wear modern combat boots, but these are in fact very light weight which made running feel better. On the downside, I would not like to have anything heavy fall on my foot because the leather is quite thin. My feet were completely dry and if I know how to wrap the footwraps better, not like a halfwit my feet would feel little bit less sore. I plan to buy proper footwraps and test it for some 10+ km march in summer to see if my fingers would fall off or not :D

[@fizz576]

I have been loving these videos on military boots. You should take a look at some Servis Cheetahs they are infamous for their use by the Taliban, Mujahideen, and even the Afghan security force over the last 40 years.

[@b.e.e.l.i]

just googled this. sorry but the taliban has no business walking around with that much drip

[@Totemparadox]

@@b.e.e.l.i Inshallah Brother.

[@paulerastov]

You can still buy new ones in Russia, they are very often bought by workers to work at a construction site

[@jackmacfakie1387]

Waterproof, light and cheap I'd wear them.

[@sinisterthoughts2896]

​@@jackmacfakie1387I prefer a steel toe in construction .

[@TheDemonpunk]

I absolutely love these kind of videos Weston. Please keep doing these more historical boots. They're super fun.

[@OstoloB]

The kirza boots are also very easy and quick to put on. Also in around a month of wearing they change their shape exactly to your feet and become quite comfortable. I never had any problems with nails when I was in Soviet army, like feeling them. And especially during the WW2 russian soldiers had to walk enormous distanses, when the roads turn to mud, and that is what thouse boots are really made for.

[@ericlaval9583]

Sore feet, the nightmare of infantrymen . Those boots adresses two of the most important issues of walking miles over miles : weight and dryness . Lesson learned from my time in the French marine infantry (2ème RIMA regiment)

[@Horazzify]

I love the historical boot series! It’s awesome getting to learn and see these little thought items that were insanely important but often overlooked.

[@martin-vv9lf]

me too. had to learn about one of the world wars at school and how the allies would cut the frozen legs off german corpses, throw them in an oven for 20 minutes to thaw out, then wear their boots because their own were giving them trenchfoot. I do wonder what were the brand of those boots that made them so valuable.

[@WolfShadowhill]

It’s also important to mention that it’s worn with foot wraps and not socks, it makes a huge difference

[@dees3179]

I’m really glad you added the stats about views versus museum visits. I work in museums. It’s a perpetual problem. And then does anyone actually pay attention when they are there….I’m so pleased to see videos like this reaching so people who are just sat at home and haven’t had to even travel and negotiate the terrible cafe! It’s a great way of getting meaningful history to people, and telling a story and interacting with an object is much more accessible than sticking something in a case and having a label next to it. We are so restricted by how much information we can get across. I work with the objects but the visitors never get to see what I see. They see two lines on a label, and no context. This is far more useful. Thank you. Try and get your hands on straw insulated winter army boots - massive things. It would be interesting to freeze them too and compare their performance.

[@ididthisonpulpous6526]

I find your historical analysis of boots of WWII an amazing analysis! It is such an important piece of kit that just gets overlooked by so many fanboys. If you've ever had to do a road march with your rucksack you are INTIMATELY aware of how good or bad your boots are! Thanks for your efforts to bring light to such a cool part of our history!

[@_bats_]

Another massive advantage of this construction method, especially given the circumstances: they don't require any industrial machines or electricity. The nailed construction is all handmade and construction could continue even in awful conditions, unlike boots that were made with goodyear welt stitching machines.

[@jackmacfakie1387]

Low tech mass produced - yep, sounds like Soviet Russia.

[@MollyGermek]

@@jackmacfakie1387 Cope. They went from a backwards agrarian state to parity with the US, the most powerful empire in history, while victims of the holocaust. China has now surpassed you.

[@davidstone2319]

Worst boot? I've worn out at least two pairs of them. I love them. I've worn them with both socks and footwraps. Because they (or the footwraps) are not tight, they don't restrict blood flow to the feet, meaning your feet don't get so cold in cold weather, and in the heat, your feet don't sweat so bad, because they are loose enough for sweat to more easily escape. Easy to get on and off - you can't say that about the WWII US Army lace up boot with those blasted gaiters.

[@Sergio_Hattifnatt]

Hi there! Im russian and i was in army in 2005-2006 and yes, i was wearing kirza boots with portyanki))).

[@LocalDallasMan]

I really love and respect this whole video. Beautifully produced, I love your justification, ad placement and your great camera presence. Subbed!!

[@b.p.3743]

Great video! ... Wow.. I had no idea about WW2 boots variations and the impact of each of them This was very informative and added even more perspective to the logistics of the war... Well done 😊

[@Alikersantti]

In Finnish army we using almost same two types high boots as part of combat equipment for summer and winter forest.

[@jfruser]

Love the history: military, materials, etc. I think that you have shown that the RIGHT answer for combat boots in WWII might depend on the country and its circumstances. Kind of like tactics and armament. Oh, and rage, rage, ragedy, rage-a-licious, rage-a-mungous. For the al-go-rythm.

[@michelecastaldini2506]

love your content! the way you talk about history and boots together is amazing

[@Hunter-dc2nk]

Best series you do IMO. Thanks bro.

[@diamonddigs6206]

Happy to hear you are working on ww2 japanese repros. I definitely put myself on the mailing list for that.

[@THEBOOMER110]

The one you cut was a nice pair, the one I got was a cold war variant, cardboard inner soles so the first time I wore them melted the inner soles, dont use socks on them, they will chew through socks within a day, if you wanna make it work with socks replace the inner soles, other than that its waterproof and will do as advertised.

[@Ezerhoden950]

Cool video! Thanks Weston, and Every Man Jack

[@Punisher9419]

Cheap waterproof boot that just worked. Might not be the most comfortable but it was the best boot that the USSR needed at the time. Could have made something fancy but you would have ended up with dudes fighting barefoot. Tall boots are also great in the wet muddy conditions that the Eastern Front was infamous for, a conventional boot would have been pretty horrible in comaprison considering the depth of the mud would have meant mud in you're boots.

[@the7observer]

Typical for USSR: Cheap, easy and quick to build. Also no laces: Muddy terrain is a nightmare for laced boots. But the downside is that there isn't much ankle support

[@wecx2375]

Gotta have kilties

[@robbyt.5258]

@@wecx2375 Kilties are good but unfortunately they don't protect the laces or eyelets. And when everything is covered in mud, it takes a long time to take off your shoes and clean it.

[@VWP1976]

Сапоги носили поверх портянок. Сапоги сидели на ноге очень плотно.

[@richbrice3299]

An excellent video. Thanks and keep up the good work. A lifelong WW2 enthusiast, I have learned such a lot from your channel. Great job.

[@megapangolin1093]

Completely love your videos and watch every one. You make history real and you highlight that quality is important in our disposable world. Well done and keep up the great work.

[@baxx56kurz30]

During my service in the army 2007-2009, we were given these boots for the first time. We wore them either with party girls or with socks. It was more comfortable in party girls only because of the soft material that was pleasant to the foot and the shoes sat tighter to the foot. We were lucky to find boots from the 40s and 50s. They were very beautiful and virtually immortal. Then everyone finally changed their shoes into shoes, but that's another story ....

[@elFulberto]

What are party girls?

[@Andrii87]

@@elFulberto bad yandex translate probably. He meant portianka.

[@bootedcameraman6393]

Wow! I love how you took the time to dive into the history of Russia and how the boot played a role!! It would be cool to own a pair someday! Great video!👏👏

[@chadleyballantyne1027]

What a great video! I love the WW2 boot series. Great work. Entertaining. Informative. Thank you!!!

[@christopherneufelt8971]

I would like to personally thank you for the deepness of your research. If I had to do it I wouldn't have reached this level of detail that you put. Bravo, Bravo!

[@Kodos78]

in 1984, I was a teenager in the USSR, and I lived in a military town, my parents bought me children's kirza boots in a military store, at first I didn't like them because they were too simple, but after wearing them I got great pleasure from their patency everywhere and superiority in fights with peers. I think the big mistake was the refusal of the army from kirza boots, modern tactical shoes are just a shame.

[@Grisuu]

Superiority in fights with peers? Can you explain that

[@Kodos78]

@@Grisuu Superiority is when you have two blacksmith's hammers on your feet, one blow with a cast-iron boot - the opponent is disabled. Still impenetrable shin protection. Also, when walking through the forest, there is a feeling that the tracks from the t-34 tank are on their feet. At the same time, the boots are light, warm in winter, cool to the foot and dry in summer. For reliability-ideal. The most important thing is that the child has such an opinion! And also, perhaps you didn't know - in the browser from the Yandex search engine, all videos are translated by voice!!! online in your native language, it is extremely convenient. Try.

[@ironhell813]

In the west, we’d call those shit kickers.

[@F0XD1E]

I think the light weight and water proofness would be a larger benefit than flame resistance and puncture resistance (of the shaft). It'd be nice if they could be laced though, because I doubt these properly fitted many soldiers.

[@northerndeer2959]

They are supposed to be worn with footwraps - you can google the word "портянки" and see what I mean - that solve the fitting (and hygiene) problem. Variations for paratroopers had laces on top of the shaft so that boots don't fly off though

[@CrappyProducts]

Thanks for these videos, they are so interesting to watch from a historic point of view

[@sirflingspoo]

Outstanding information and presentation, as always.👍

[@darraghchapman]

First vid I've seen of yours. Nice points you put towards the to justify the experiment. I think these equally apply to MRE reviews (Steve1989 being the master, of course.) It's a great middle ground between documentation of primary sources and experimental archaeology.

[@robertogattoli]

Today's military footwear is designed for mechanized troops, those of that period were for long marches, for walking in snow and mud I would have preferred these boots, I think the evaluation should consider the environment of use, In this case, for example compared to the boots of the Germans, the Soviet ones were lighter, waterproof, cheap to produce and a little higher, it seems difficult to argue that they were worse.

[@Ob1sdarkside]

I love the history behind the development of the boot. Fair play for all the work you put into your vids. Outstanding

[@dasdrandulett]

when I entered military school, the hardest thing was to learn how to run in kirza boots to exercise, because the footcloth was constantly getting off my feet. Then I wore officer's leather boots for a short time and they were much heavier, and in the end we were changed into lace-up boots - "bertsy" - , but the saddest thing was that the footcloths were taken away and in winter it was very cold in socks

[@zacharywilliams8220]

Two issues: It was not the Russian army in WWII, it was the Red Army or Soviet Army. The Soviet Union was a multiethnic state! These boots are postwar production. They're very close to wartime, but it's not a proper comparison IMO

[@BradyBubbuhgum-fh4ny]

Point is you knew exactly what he meant

[@anon2427]

The Russian army also had various ethnicities in it

[@willieclark2256]

Russia pre revolution was a multiethnic state and it remains one today. The Soviet Union was an empire, whose interests included violently suppressing the social and democratic agency of the people within (and often without) the empire

[@vast9467]

He was not saying Russian army because he did not know they were Soviet Union.

[@jaan58]

The name Kirza is an abbreviation of the name of the factory where they were made, KIRovsky ZAvod (Kirov Factory).

[@RodasReviews]

Was literally about to close the video once the ad started lol but I watched it to the end. Here to support!

[@sumeetsarkar4]

Always look forward to your videos! Keep at it!

[@jefreyjefrey6349]

you need to wear Protyanki. wrap your feet with special cloth. by using different ways to wrap your feet you can get extra comfort, warmth or even cooling your feet. and you can change them pretty fast if your feet sweat.. btw. you can also roll the top down so the boot will became shorter and more ventilated.

[@danijel3227]

Lower part is most important and it is leather + rubber, upper only keep water out and for that purpose works. Boots are light what is another plus if you wear them almost all the time. In short, perfect war boots.

[@Totemparadox]

Perfect war boots for a poor nation with massive army. Bad boots for the soldiers.

[@danijel3227]

@@Totemparadox No.

[@Totemparadox]

@@danijel3227 Yes

[@danijel3227]

@@Totemparadox What exactly is bad or poor or not functional in those boots? Leather part, synthetic waterproof part, rubber part, nailed together part, light weight part? Or is it maybe"commie" part that bothers you? Hm, expert?

[@Totemparadox]

@@danijel3227 By all records these are some of the most uncomfortable boots according to people who have used them either in service or civilian life. Also the fact that they're pull ons means they slide on your feet needing extra steps to not get blisters. Also being totally waterproof means your feet become like a swamp.

[@darrenhall7454]

So interesting. I love these military boot videos. A real education. Thank you. 😁👍

[@larsrons7937]

Thanks for an interesting investigation and analysis.

[@yltf]

Отдельное спасибо за кирзовые сапоги! Три лайка!

[@walterbryan1798]

Great video! I'm surprised they added latex/rubber material to the outside material. I would think it would crack over time, but I guess not. I'm totally on-board witht he Japanese boot repro, so long as they're less than $300 per pair...

[@717UT]

You're historic boot series is fantastic. Keep it up!

[@rejat1092]

love the historical boot videos keep em coming!

[@numberstation]

I’d like to see you examine a pair of British Army DMS (Directly Moulded Sole) boots that were used from the 1950s to the 80s and were hated as far as I know, they’re cheap and easy to find. I own a pair from 1980, they’re not the worst things I’ve ever worn but certainly not the best, either.

[@ek-nz]

I have around 20 pairs of the NZ version.

[@numberstation]

@@ek-nz 20 pairs? What are you, a centipede?😂👍

[@ek-nz]

@@numberstation And they’re all different sizes. Not a centipede, a CO. Sometimes the problems are similar.

[@sinisterthoughts2896]

​@@ek-nzthat is a rather witty reply, I commend you.

[@Curionimbus]

So stoked for the Japanese boot... been saving up for the occasion. Can't wait.

[@jamesolbrisch2582]

Once again, thank you for doing this. It's one thing to see the boot whole and understand what it's made of and how, but deconstructing it shows it, it's valuable because this video will last forever but all of these boots will eventually deteriorate and disappear

[@jantepas7511]

Thanks for this interesting view and information!

[@user-tf5kh5jt3v]

Служил в них в 90х годах, в пограничных войсках. Ходили очень много, по пересечённой местности. Из-за этих поганых сапог заработал варикоз. Это самая плохая обувь, которую я носил. Единственный их плюс - надёжность.

[@M0n01it]

ну в 90х уже можно было горные боты надыбать если постараться, или яловые сапоги.. А так - портянки нужно мотать правильно, с разной толщиной на стопе для продольной и поперечной поддержки. Научиться можно за пару недель, но если не получится - писос ногам, это да.

[@user-tf5kh5jt3v]

@@M0n01it , где это на заставе в 90-е горные ботинки надыбать? Там новые сапоги хрен найдёшь. И куда там в горных ботах идти в лесу и по болотам!? А портянки хороши тем, что можно использовать 2 конца, да и то не всегда. Иногда портянки выдавали меньшего размера и дырявые. Приходилось простынь рвать. Оружия и патронов было дохрена, а остального нет. Или думаете у нас за 2 года портянки не научились мотать!? Если обувь гавно, то остальное не сильно поможет. А кирзовые сапоги полное Говнище, знаю по своему опыту. А тем, кто утверждает обратное, желаю и на том свете в них ходить. Ещё добавлю: зимой у нас кирзачам альтернативы не было, а вот по теплу там очень подошли бы Джангл Бутсы со времён Вьетнама.

[@-IE_it_yourself]

shitty translation. "He served in them in the 90s, in the border troops. We walked a lot, over rough terrain. Because of these filthy boots, varicose veins have earned. These are the worst shoes I've worn. Their only advantage is reliability."

[@andrewallen9993]

So like a Vostok amphibia watch then? As robust, reliable and waterproof as a Rolex but not as pretty and you have to regulate it yourself if you want Rolex levels of accuracy.

[@M65V19]

@@andrewallen9993 Those watches were good by the time, and somehow decent now. Also require precise engineering. But kirza boots always were shit.

[@wompa70]

For Russian winters spent in the trenches with minimal access to supplies, I think I'd take these over the other WW2 boots. Especially with linen foot wraps instead of wool socks.

[@Sergio_Hattifnatt]

There was two types of that what you call linen foot wraps: regular, for spring and summer and winter ones, for cold part of the year. Winter wraps was made from much more thiker and warmer material. We call them portyankee))).

[@M0n01it]

For russian winter in trenches you should get wool valenki. If you can wear boots in trenches - that's spring or autumn ))

[@BobSaint]

My father is a dirt poor peasant's son, he was actually born in the mountains while his family was running from SS division murdering a whole region, he spent his whole childhood wearing basic leather moccasin-like shoes in winter only, the rest of the year walking bare footed, and he absolutely hated those army foot wraps during his conscription. He said he would "cheat" and wear wool socks his mother hand-made instead.

[@sinisterthoughts2896]

Linen is well known for not holding heat, hence why it is prized in warmer climates.

[@chaffcutter58.]

Excellent video mate, I love any laceless boot especially for the speed of putting them on,

[@andreluislimaa]

i know and appreciate the information your work brings, that said, it always PAINS ME to see historical boots being cut XD

[@MLMguitarguy]

Russia had 4 million troops in its army in 1914 everyone in Europe had large armies at the time. By the end of the war each country fielded over 7 million men each. 60 million men saw combat. 9 million died. Russia alone lost almost 3 million. Estimates counting civilians for that war and revolution is around 10 million depending who you ask. We heavily downplay WW1 in America.

[@justsomeguy5470]

The events of WW1 had a huge impact on WW2. I think we could do a better job of displaying it as well. It was an important war that affected the lives of hundreds of millions of people

[@sinisterthoughts2896]

We do not "down play" WW1 in the U.S., we just simply weren't involved with most of it. You also don't learn much about the Russo-Japanese war, or the Crimean war for the same reason, just as people in Europe probably don't study much about the Mexico campaign, the Spanish American War or the Civil War and reconstruction. It's a matter of perspective, not suppression. I do wish there was more emphasis on it, but do to the political side coming out for the last half century schools avoid anything approaching modern history.

[@MLMguitarguy]

@sinisterthoughts2896 thank you for further proving the point by listing a bunch of examples of events that don't get exposure in the U.S. the seriousness of these events deserves much more attention.

[@robertduluth8994]

He spread bullshit about human wave tactics unfortunately kzbin.info/www/bejne/lWildmt5qLJsmtU

[@HeritageCast]

Its to not let the Goyim know about the Russian Revolution, Lend Lease, and why Ayn Rand, Mises, Fink, Greenblatt, Mayorkas, Blinken are in the country as Spies. And somehow didnt get Dutch Ovened lol.. Cant have it both ways.. Cant be a marginalized group and have a Israeli Junta, and Oligarchy... Youll get your kids taken away like Yeezy... Its too bad Mean Mr Mustache didnt invade Russia sooner... Thankfully the Russikis know now and are "De Mr Mustashing" Ukraine and their Israeli Oligarch...

[@TheRealCartman1]

Was the new Kirza material that much better then the old one that cracked and didn't insulate? I'm wondering if there was a breakthrough or desperation made them accept whatever they could get.

[@PanzerAce247]

They actually managed to change the material compsition so it would stay flexible in sub zero temperatures, if memory serves me. Even though the soviets liked things on the cheap, it had to last.

[@C18H19NaO5S]

I appreciate your archival efforts. It is truly invaluable.

[@afwalker1921]

You're providing an education that helps me in my craft. I'm a novelist, and I never know what I will need to know, you know? Keep 'em coming!

[@alejmonzon]

Kirza boots are like T 34 tanks, unrefined, quick to produce, innovative, and easy to repair. I really liked this video because it gives a historical perspective of the problem of equipping what at that time was the population of entire countries with footwear. Even the very fact that Soviet soldiers were not given socks, but two pieces of cloth with which they wrapped their feet and which in summer allowed ventilation and prevented the foot from cooking and in winter created pockets of hot air for avoid frostbite of the feet. . Not to mention avoiding abrasions from both the lining material and the nails with which the boot was built. Plus they look great. YuoTube comrades return the money, respect the rules of capitalism

[@christopherbrice5473]

Easy to replace

[@falcon6329]

soviets had the best technology but no money

[@Pepe_Silvia]

But the man in the video said that those boots could not be repaired. And the T-34 tanks were not easy to repair at all.

[@alexfad242]

Спасибо за обзор! Служил в 1991-93 годах и у нас они ещё были. Не сразу к ним привыкаешь.Из недостатков, подошва быстро стиралась,а так довольно крепкие сапоги.

[@KH-tt3wv]

I never imagined that shoes could give us such an interesting perspective on history! Thanks for doing this series -- I'm learning a lot.

[@fmtnic]

Great job on this...and all of your videos!

[@mezmerya5130]

kirza is conscript boot. leather is much more prevalent . But it's russian leather (юфть, хромовая кожа), so there is a catch... also, americans supplied 10 millions pairs of boots for russian army, and kirza had been rolled out in relatively late stage of war. so saying it saved the war to even some extent is kinda wrong.

[@fedorkuz637]

а чем юфть плоха? я без хейта, просто интересно.

[@mezmerya5130]

@@fedorkuz637 водоустойчовость сильно ниже, чем у классического дубления.

[@lordexcellent5610]

These are one of the worst variants of this type of boots. I am quite fond of soviet footwear, I own several pairs of jackboots “Sapogi” (kirza and leather ones for soldiers and a really nice pair for officers/parades) and low work boots. They fascinate me in a way (I appreciate the cheapness, simplicity and nastiness) I find them to be one of the worst well made (built to last) shoes. I also frequently wear a pair of leather “soldier” sapogi (with leather soles) and a pair of already mentioned low boots (with rubber soles). The jackboots I wear are actually quite nice, they were made in the 60s/70s by Ромны, the shaft and vamp is lined with nice pig skin (the ankle area is left unlined so it can fold around your foot while the shaft stays straight), the soles, heels and half soles are made entirely from leather and nailed on using brass nails. I’d also say that the uppers are made from thicker leather than those in the video ( plus they’re all grain out) and they also have a toe stiffener. I installed a thin leather insole to protect myself from the nails and the boots are quite comfortable in the end, the layers of leather mold to your feet overtime and the nails are none issue. The low work boots are on the other hand, as nasty as it gets. They’re much cheaper the stitching is not straight at all, the eyelets are sharp and the last is quite weird there were also lasting tacks sticking through the vamp that were left there by the workers who made them. But surprisingly, they’re also relatively comfortable after a few months of wear. I think it would be really interesting to compare these horrible work boots that were used in the Soviet Union at the same time you were using the red wing moc toes with cristy soles in America. Thank you for the great video.

[@axeavier]

I'm not sure why you write "sapogi" when it simply means boots

[@lordexcellent5610]

@@axeavier you’re right, it’s mostly a thing of habit for me. I have it from a Russian cobbler who worked on these boots, he always referred to the jack boots as “sapogi” and to the low work boots as “botinki” (ботинки) even though it both means just boots/shoes. These boots are also often referend to by their materials (yuft, kirzachi etc).

[@tutzdesYT]

@@axeavier "sapogi" term does not directly translate into English. Boots with laces are called "botinki" in Russia regardless of the height. The "sapogi" term is only used for high boots without laces. So the subject of the video is a boot, but for Russian speaker it is not "botinok" but "sapog". All boots used in video for comparison's sake (except German one) are not "sapogi" but "botinki".

[@yaboyed5779]

Never thought I’d love to see a history of an army boot. Amazing content.

[@quickXkid]

Long time fan. You guys do an amazing job. Keep it up.

[@KrustyDong]

Here before Demonetization

[@galvanizedgnome]

God Bless Russia for winning WW2. The world would be a way worse place without Russia.

[@jordanandrew2786]

Not going to be demonetized, KZbin likes communism.

[@Username-jb2vs]

For..?

[@KrustyDong]

@@Username-jb2vs History is bad in this Cancel Culture Society

[@russianarkadiy]

Why