"because they're heavy" i just saved you 9 minutes.
@brianhajj4 жыл бұрын
Bamwich saved my time thank you
@Israelball4 жыл бұрын
Bamwich hahahhahhaahhahah
@yurig50814 жыл бұрын
Thank you, i already knew this just wondered if they had other points, but i guess thats literally the only limiting factor.
@Bamwich4 жыл бұрын
Yuri G it’s kinda the only thing that matters when it comes to planes.
@billeaea59544 жыл бұрын
Bamwich thx
@chettpamplona11794 жыл бұрын
Imagine being on a plane and hear the captain saying that the battery is low
@mobsherhasssn51744 жыл бұрын
Easy. Passengers have pedals that can charge it. Lol.
@jeksenricaprio78324 жыл бұрын
@@mobsherhasssn5174 lmao
@thekrieger29594 жыл бұрын
@@mobsherhasssn5174 hey wait a minute that could work
@bkumar23864 жыл бұрын
Use my power bank 😂
@z-trip54574 жыл бұрын
@@mobsherhasssn5174 That's for economy class lol.
@bdeemter12344 жыл бұрын
Let me save you some time, battery energy density isn’t there yet. Too heavy for how much energy you get out of the batteries.
@jaimehernandez49624 жыл бұрын
also, it will never reach speed like jet engine can make as well. it will take longer than usually. air travel time will be longer.
@olayinkaanifowose50994 жыл бұрын
Brandon Deemter thank you
@seontonppa4 жыл бұрын
@@jaimehernandez4962 Never? Do you have any idea how fast the tech of batteries, engines etc are developing?
@Hhhh22222-w4 жыл бұрын
@@jaimehernandez4962 it will, that's just the nature of technology
@tahaimrankhan4 жыл бұрын
Just use solid state batteries They are new and invented by japan
@georgethomas35974 жыл бұрын
Are we gonna look over the fact that inventor of lithium ion battery is named John B.Goodenough.
@harrymu1483 жыл бұрын
that's prolly why they do explode sometimes lmao jkjk
@flashdancer423 жыл бұрын
Hahaha I was looking for that comment. What a name!
@easygoing24792 жыл бұрын
It's a *RARE* day that I actually learn something from KZbin. Thank you, George!
@user-pn3im5sm7k2 жыл бұрын
It was actually invented by Akira Yoshino in 1985, John B. Goodenough and Stanley Wittingham only contributed by research from the 70s, which then, wasn't enough to make a Lithium-ion battery prototype from and required more research. Hence why they never made one.
@georgethomas35972 жыл бұрын
@@user-pn3im5sm7k sad that all inventions have to have someone not getting the credit they deserve.
@LEEGOOVER99014 жыл бұрын
4:46 why is it so wrong looking at the truck........
@thestudentofficial54834 жыл бұрын
Lol WTF i just realized how freaky that truck is
@nuclearcockatiels39734 жыл бұрын
Its cursed
@corrected19914 жыл бұрын
The truck is designed to move planes. It grabs their front wheel.
@dailydoseofgtaonline4484 жыл бұрын
@@corrected1991y cut the back lol
@PabloGonzalez-hv3td4 жыл бұрын
It's more maneuverable
@badmeme68014 жыл бұрын
Title: "Why we still don't have electric planes" First 15 seconds of the video: "electric planes have been around since the 1970s"
@kentclark64204 жыл бұрын
They probably mean viably commercial electric planes.
@raw58664 жыл бұрын
Bart Bell • Yeah, but it’s still kind of ironic.
@Radioactive_Bunny.4 жыл бұрын
Bart Bell wooooosh
@TheGuyThatsNotFunny4 жыл бұрын
@@Radioactive_Bunny. how is this a woooosh moment
@natlus68054 жыл бұрын
@@Radioactive_Bunny. keanu big chungus wholesome 100 moment
@davidscheibelreiter35804 жыл бұрын
"Companies have to prove every inch of their aircraft is safe." Not if it's Boeing
@kimjunguny4 жыл бұрын
I mean the plane was safe. They did speed up the training process though, and thats why people died. Basically since the pilots had limited experience with the plane they didn't know how to fix the problem that killed them. Boeing is very safe.
@davidscheibelreiter35804 жыл бұрын
@@kimjunguny And the FOD in the Fuel Tanks were found because they are so safe?😂
@play0055174 жыл бұрын
If it's a completely new plane, sure you need to prove every inch. Boeing tried too hard to make their new plane not that new, so the approval process failed.
@A108104 жыл бұрын
I feel like everyone in this comment section doesn’t know what they’re talking about
@PeterAuto14 жыл бұрын
Are you talking about the one software error that affect Planes running for too long.
@bobhoye59512 жыл бұрын
The problem with batteries has to do with the density of energy that can be stored. Even the most modern batteries are heavy but carry little energy relative to gasoline or jet fuel tanks.
@nafnaf02 жыл бұрын
Yep, battery energy density is poor compared to jet fuel. Also the efficiency of airplanes is already fairly high, so there is not a lot of gains to be made
@nazeronallen2 жыл бұрын
They have the technology it’s just that they need people poor😂
@Bretaxy2 жыл бұрын
I think we should switch over to fossil fuels, would save a heck ton of money.
@alucar.33382 жыл бұрын
I agree with u BUT, everything that those plans need to be completed do exist in 2022, THE BIGGEST PROBLEM IS THAT: EVERY other airline, investors, companies, politicians, and all the others, Philthy Rich people in the world won't allow it to happen or come to life. Bcuz all of them will be losing money big time, so they will fight down the battery idea, make sure every news station an reporter continuously talk about it and convince the public that it's a threat to human life. NIKOLA TESLA TOWER for example: It was created an proven fully functional, he just needed the funding witch he didn't receive BCUZ the tower was capable of sending direct current to your home with a special isolated antenna. And it would of been free to the world. A week after he demonstration to the government he died, the government went straight to his home and took every single piece of information even his pocketbook and pocket watch that his wife had for him. UP TO THIS DAY the tower was never found or talked about. We have the technology, understanding and components to create futuristic Technologies BŰT, the money hunger people of every country won't allow us to fully evaluate bcuz most of the minerals and other materials won't be needed anymore and that's bad for their business.
@electric7487 Жыл бұрын
Not only that, but one of the most important aspects of commercial aircraft is that they burn off significant amounts of their weight as they fly, as the fuel being used up means that the airplane gets more efficient as it flies. This would be completely lacking in an electric plane.
@Marco-hl6gz4 жыл бұрын
0:00 what could a future with electric planes look like? $25 tickets... Laughs in Europe
@josepha725134 жыл бұрын
Marco Poletti Laughs in Ryanair
@livethefuture24924 жыл бұрын
@@josepha72513 laughs in 737 MAX
@craggywag54 жыл бұрын
Marco Poletti what? I don’t get it
@build22704 жыл бұрын
@@craggywag5 So, in Europe, it costs way less than in the states, Asia, Africa or middle east, thats because in Europe theres alot of countries, and most of those countries has ALOT of money, thats why it doesnt cost much for a average citizen to fly around in Europe, one of my friends took a flight from Norway to England for 3 dollars, and that wasnt even on RyanAir, so flying in Europe is not expensive at all
@craggywag54 жыл бұрын
Christoffer Stenslie thanks, Jesus Christ that’s cheap
@brunoglopes4 жыл бұрын
“John B. Goodenough” what a name.
@gevorgantonyan84174 жыл бұрын
He is Goodenough tho, you can’t lie😂
@ebubechioti74104 жыл бұрын
He is a legend. Responsible for so many modern material developments.
@mateomisain4 жыл бұрын
Search him on youtube you won't regret it! He's a literal legend, invented so many modern everyday technology and is still working at 98 years old with his team!! I have huge respect for that man and a lot of people don't even know about him
@tigerdoug97894 жыл бұрын
Lol 😂
@tooley8774 жыл бұрын
John Be Good enough
@tonyhollerz69584 жыл бұрын
4:46 aircraft engineers take note of this pickup... that’s what you call weight reduction.
@rhysgittoes65444 жыл бұрын
nutella1204 4:46****
@tonyhollerz69584 жыл бұрын
Rhys Gittoes thanks man😂😂😂
@tousifzaman93924 жыл бұрын
Actually it has its weight shifted :P those are modified for towing planes. They have a big hook in front attached.
@PabloGonzalez-hv3td4 жыл бұрын
It's more of an optical illusion. It's just reconfigured for maneuverability
@ichbrauchmehrkaffee57854 жыл бұрын
This pickup truck was designed by aircraft engineers for weight reduction. CHANGE MY MIND
@kevinlm50734 жыл бұрын
00:15 "they haven't really taken off". 00:17 "what is keeping them 'grounded'. That is two puns in a row and they didn't even mention it.
@jonathanbowen36404 жыл бұрын
4:46 WHAT IS THAT? Where is its back?
@papalouie55174 жыл бұрын
Lol
@ijakubamadej4 жыл бұрын
I looked at it for a good 5 minutes and still couldn't figure it out
@wtfstudioinc.18274 жыл бұрын
Jonathan Bowen it is half to conserve energy and to reduce weight.
@suwwan19654 жыл бұрын
Where are the wings??
@tousifzaman93924 жыл бұрын
@@ijakubamadej Those are modified for towing planes. They have a big hook in front attached.
@N0pe_G4 жыл бұрын
6:01 Guy: we are very confident testing the plane in flight early 2020. Corona: oh hell nah you won't
@THEMATT2224 жыл бұрын
lol
@bro60464 жыл бұрын
Haha
@ketsu96704 жыл бұрын
Actually this is better Corona: oh yes count me in!
@LeBaldJames23-4 жыл бұрын
I wont go on it till one of them crashes then they will fix it
@jebise11264 жыл бұрын
testing isnt problematic they are probably testing right now
@jebise11264 жыл бұрын
6:58 yes! "we are using the wrong tools for the job" fast trains for shorter trips not electric planes. (at least in areas with very high concentration of people)
@frank_av8tor4 жыл бұрын
Right, just like in California 😱😂🤣
@mister_grizzlee51054 жыл бұрын
@@frank_av8tor well, don't know about USA, but trains are still better for short and medium inter-city travel,and even for longer distances ffs. Just look at Japan, China and Europe.
@jebise11264 жыл бұрын
@Entrepreneur ynhbg hyper loop is hyper shit. doesnt work never will be bye and have fun
@jonathantan24694 жыл бұрын
This becomes a problem if you're travelling from London to Copenhagen or Amsterdam... where there is a large body of water in between
@jebise11264 жыл бұрын
@@jonathantan2469 well there is already tunnel under chanel there but yes of course over seas train is a bit less useful but there are still huge masses of population that are not separated by sea.
@minedphreak84872 жыл бұрын
2020 "We used a glider to reduce risk and harm to anyone while testing". 1960 "We taped a seat onto the front of this rocket there is also a cupholder for your whiskey near the ashtray" We've come a long way in aviation.
@aiwa50084 жыл бұрын
Elon musk after watching this video HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM
@danielguy8514 жыл бұрын
aiwa500 please Elon were counting on you !
@entity99574 жыл бұрын
He said in a interview that we currently don't need electric planes what we need is electric cars
@sunnygogna50974 жыл бұрын
Yep my thoughts exactly.
@mockingspongebob7734 жыл бұрын
he also said in an interview that tesla electric plane is feasible, but it requires a change in battery density, tesla is already working on "million mile battery" in Fremont factory, I expect tesla plane in 10 years max
@aerithofmyore4 жыл бұрын
@@mockingspongebob773 more funding for tesla!
@sujiewansuj37884 жыл бұрын
Planes: dont bring large batteries onboard Electric planes: WE GOT A GIANT BATTERY BRUH
@ethanwestfall74214 жыл бұрын
The pLaNe IS thE BaTteRy BrUh
@sexycow984 жыл бұрын
All commercial aircraft have more than one huge battery on board.
@TheeLogicGamer4 жыл бұрын
I get where you're coming from, but the difference is that an aircraft like any vehicle is serviced regularly, and have multiple sensors, backup systems and circuitry that can disconnect power or give early warning in case an error is detected, this is not the case with passenger items. In-fact you can fly large batteries with the correct paperwork, and its easier to do so if the battery is new, tested, and low in charge. Just hard to regulate for commercial flights.
@CasvGl4 жыл бұрын
or you just drain the batteries of the phones of the passengers.
@omegaRST4 жыл бұрын
@@CasvGl Im pretty sure that would grant you about half a second of extra flight time
@navorski76604 жыл бұрын
4:46 That truck looks so ridiculous lmao 😂😂😂
@vanessapaz86314 жыл бұрын
Glad you noticed how is it driving?
@Chazahc184 жыл бұрын
Vanessa Paz its in reverse lol
@Hi-im-Riox4 жыл бұрын
@@Chazahc18 she means it only has two wheels how is it driving. Now answering to that, I would assume the weight of the metal in the front weighs it down to be able to be a two wheeler
@stforksandadream19854 жыл бұрын
Hahahhahah
@goodcitizen4774 жыл бұрын
It did look weird. I had to roll the video back a few seconds to get another look. Glad I wasn't the only one who saw it.
@georgesbv13 жыл бұрын
A smaller problem that I see for bigger aircrafts would be that while regular planes to the descent lighter by many tones of fuel, an electric plane would have the exactly same weight as at takeoff.
@albradley55272 жыл бұрын
Yes and batteries weigh a whole lot more than fuel.
@seconddaymusic83932 жыл бұрын
Being heavier on decent isn't an issue, it's taking off that's the issue. This is why in-air refueling is a thing, we can take off with a lighter fuel load and then fill up in the air so we have enough fuel to reach the destination.
@gamersnoob23782 жыл бұрын
@@seconddaymusic8393 that’s what us did while leaving from the taliban country
@seconddaymusic83932 жыл бұрын
@@gamersnoob2378 im aware, im an aircraft maintainer for the squadron that was in charge of making that airlift happen.
@aintfromrounhere80992 жыл бұрын
@Straight white unvaccinated male how would he know
@alikhamis33674 жыл бұрын
*even though electric planes have exist for years they haven't really taken off* Ha funi joke ;)
@azurealpaca4 жыл бұрын
Ali Khamis 😂
@azurealpaca4 жыл бұрын
Joe mama Me if Gay 😂
@lilpuro21524 жыл бұрын
Ali Khamis *funny
@BilalKhan-qj4cr4 жыл бұрын
*punny
@tanfred86294 жыл бұрын
why are theygrounded?
@RizLazey4 жыл бұрын
4:46 "I DONT NEED SLEEP, I NEED ANSWERS!!"
@goldenwolf37234 жыл бұрын
I believe it’s because center of mass is more in the front
@CuriousEarthlings4 жыл бұрын
That the real technological breakthrough
@eboubaker37224 жыл бұрын
I think that the other 2 wheels are in the front of that metal bar. the wheels you see are actually the rear wheels of this utility car.
@zyon45314 жыл бұрын
Me: *forgets to charge my phone* i can go without it i guess Me: *forgets to charge my plane* FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU-
@somthingarageMD4 жыл бұрын
just use it as a glider then
@DaddyM7MD4 жыл бұрын
Fack!
@x23esports224 жыл бұрын
@@somthingarageMD wtf bruh? A gLider is far more different and lighter than a massive ass plane with more massive batteries👺
@kwsmetna4 жыл бұрын
@@x23esports22 that's the joke
@kwsmetna4 жыл бұрын
@@woaa8117 well shit now I feel like I'm the dumbass
@billsmith92344 жыл бұрын
4:40,that pick-up truck Blow my mind!!
@devedee23934 жыл бұрын
4:46 what in the living world is this car
@taukedabai46134 жыл бұрын
yeah, caught my eye too
@heimskr28814 жыл бұрын
Its used to move the plane, you can see the platform attached on the front of it which most defenitely has wheels on the other side. Even then it looks so strange from that angle
@sidneyhemphill43834 жыл бұрын
We're doing 2 wheeled cars now? 🤣
@Rwyiii4 жыл бұрын
Cursed just Cursed
@Eagle100214 жыл бұрын
The likes are at 69. Nice.
@sahil_afk4 жыл бұрын
4:46 I’m so confused by the truck
@beans38084 жыл бұрын
Sahil Tiwari same
@tousifzaman93924 жыл бұрын
@@beans3808 Those are modified for towing planes. They have a big hook in front attached.
@beans38084 жыл бұрын
Tousif Zaman thank you so much, i don’t know why i was so confused, but i really wanted to know
@tousifzaman93924 жыл бұрын
@@beans3808 haha its fine, it is confusing at first look lol! Bigger airports who serves big planes has dedicated tow vehicles. But for kitty aircrafts those mods are enough.
@fbyi29404 жыл бұрын
The half of the truck is trapped in the diffrent dimension
@RandomToon12 жыл бұрын
The other thing being totally overlooked is recharge time. You can refuel a aircraft relatively fast, but even a small battery takes hours to charge. That is a lot of time on the tarmac. Even if you did something like a swappable battery bank - charge offline while the other one flies - you increase cost on battery by three; one at takeoff, one at landing, and one in flight.
@jac12072 жыл бұрын
Not to mention you have to now transport all those heavy used batteries back and forth to processing facilities, that's going to put more trips on those trucks hauling the batteries and those trucks will have to recharge their battery packs more often as well. Now we're only talking about 1 truck service to 1 airport, we haven't even factored in literally everything else. So where are we going to get all that electricity? Because it takes A LOT of solar and wind farms to generate what we use TODAY, and even then they're not enough without hydro/nuclear/coal/gas to pick up the slack. What energy production are we going to ride a nation that'll be using 80%+ EV society on to? Nevermind our aging energy infrastructure in the US, we don't even know how we'll power an EV future.
@tommurphy43072 жыл бұрын
cost is not a limiting factor
@gamernatemoore80294 жыл бұрын
Real challenge: how many times can you make the same take off joke
@mattia72774 жыл бұрын
Gamernate Moore sooo annoying
@TacitSwine7504 жыл бұрын
I'm surprised to see that this comment hasn't taken off yet.
@tommurphy43072 жыл бұрын
you mean where the plane taxis on a long cord and at takeoff the cord comes out of the plug? i love that!
@viopix69114 жыл бұрын
The plane made from scratch looks clean
@viopix69114 жыл бұрын
@@rashleonard4069 damn
@ahmadbrkam43504 жыл бұрын
Yeah it looks Smoky Hot
@finno36774 жыл бұрын
Nobody really knows what the fire started.. the Company Said it might have been caused by ground equipment.. we should wait for the investigation
@UltimateAlgorithm4 жыл бұрын
@@rashleonard4069 wow, could be charging issues. Like most smartphones battery failure.
@justaguy62164 жыл бұрын
Imagine having hundreds of little electric airplanes flying around for the short trips. It'll be a ATC nightmare.
@aminboumerdassi23344 жыл бұрын
By that time they'll have probably figured out how to completely automate ATC.
@justaguy62164 жыл бұрын
@@aminboumerdassi2334 That'll be a huge engineering challenge.
@ProfessorHobo2 жыл бұрын
Certifying that many uber pilots would be impossible. I bet uber is looking at an autopilot option for their service. If all of the short trip planes are automated it would be no problem cause the machines would just talk to each other. There would have to be a universal autopilot language created though.
@nishikun8672 жыл бұрын
@@ProfessorHobo and someone hacks into the system and deletes all the important instruction set just for fun
@willwang97892 жыл бұрын
Usually in an emergency and if the plane is overloaded normal planes will dump out extra fuel, what are you gonna do with an electric areophane? Dump out the batteries?
@ammarmuawia36792 жыл бұрын
There's prolly gon be reduction of the electricity where they can adjust the volts of it travelling thru
@STEVEDIGIBOYtv2 жыл бұрын
Ya ejecting highly flamable litium batts would could cause fires. They will adopt nuclear heat exchange power, it was in works in 1950's with GE. See Car life 1954 July edition.
@fruitpunchsamurai84 жыл бұрын
Waiting for elon to come out with a badass electric plane
@JoshBenBernales4 жыл бұрын
Check out Beta Tech, making moves 👍🏻
@TheChrisaige4 жыл бұрын
I dont think we will see big commerical airliners using batteries ever. Hydrogen is the way to go
@Chopper1534 жыл бұрын
Even battery EVs are not the future. Hydrogen is the true future. With abundant solar, wind and nuclear energy, we can generate electricity to separate hydrogen from water. That same hydrogen is oxidised in fuel cells to move cars and planes. Finally we'll a get a perfect cycle.
@TheChrisaige4 жыл бұрын
@@Chopper153 also hydrogen can be used by fusion reactors. I dont think that personal hydrogen cars can compete with ev. EV's are better and easier for everyday people. Big stuff like trains, busses, airlines and military should use hydrogen
@deejbop2644 жыл бұрын
Factx
@tobene4 жыл бұрын
"25$ tickets" Laughs in european
@Artyomthewalrus4 жыл бұрын
To be fair, europe is tiny. Thus travel is cheaper.
@littleorange35144 жыл бұрын
In singapore a flight to malaysia cost u 500 dollars in econmy
@reezlaw4 жыл бұрын
@@Artyomthewalrus USA land area: 9.1 million km² Europe land area: 10.2 million km²
@Artyomthewalrus4 жыл бұрын
@@@reezlaw Canada 9.98million km2 The same size as canada, slightly bigger than america. And a population twice that of both countries combined. Flying between two neighboring countries is usually less than two neighboring states. Flying from the capital of manitoba to the capital of ontario, two neighboring provinces is the same as flying from the capital of france to the capital of romania, which have 3 countries in between them. The only continent smaller than europe is australia, which has one country.
@reezlaw4 жыл бұрын
@@Artyomthewalrus First of all, I wasn't talking about Canada. But even if I was, who cares about the capital of this or that. You said Europe is tiny, it isn't. How many nations you cross to fly from Paris to Bucharest is utterly irrelevant.
@B10KPlaysGames4 жыл бұрын
Title: *"Why We Still Don't Have Electric Planes"* RC Plane Pilots: *_Am i a joke to you?_*
@bruhdude9634 жыл бұрын
RC planes can't lift people...
@B10KPlaysGames4 жыл бұрын
@@bruhdude963 they're still electric planes
@danielrehn814 жыл бұрын
Yes, yes you are a joke 😉
@B10KPlaysGames4 жыл бұрын
@notlikeu lol
@awwtergirl70404 жыл бұрын
Yes but they don't scale up to heavy lifting long distance people carriers. Even large RC craft are better off with gas and not lipo.
@Thebossquad4 жыл бұрын
As someone who is an aerospace engineer I can tell you these planes are farther off then you think
@paulanthony52742 жыл бұрын
Humour my ignorant arse and tell me how far we are off nuclear powered travel ? You probably don't know but ah well lol
@Someone-zx7xd2 жыл бұрын
@@paulanthony5274 In my opinion it cannot be done through fission as it produces nuclear waste which is harmful for the environment. Jet engines can be powered through nuclear fission but since it is harmful for the environment, it is not done. As for fusion, no technology has been invented to utilize the energy from nuclear fusion. Some rockets with nuclear fission as their source of energy have already been developed since nuclear waste in space is not harmful. But those rockets utilize some other safer energy sources when inside the atmosphere and those fission powered engines are activated only after it is far enough from the earth.
@ekinteko2 жыл бұрын
Exactly. If people want to have Renewable and Environmentally-Safe Air travel the solution is Hydrogen. Use solar panels to split sea water into pure Oxygen, Hydrogen, and Excess. Transport the Hydrogen Fuel with electric cars. Use modern-hybrid engine, so that the aircraft will have H2O emission, and a decent range. Sure it is weaker than a standard engine, and less efficient than battery, but the upside is that it works and is appropriate tool for this task. It may not be appropriate for all types of aircraft, like the super-large planes and military applications... but it can certainly replace the majority (80%) of planes out there and make a significant reduction to our emissions and reduce our reliance on a non-renewable fuel source. And yes, I know how ironic it sounds to recommend Hydrogen when we saw what happened with the Hindenburg Disaster.
@alpha-cf2oi2 жыл бұрын
only 16y old tesla fanboys would think this is anywhere close lol
@kieron88ward2 жыл бұрын
@@ekinteko We (the company I work for) are currently working on electric aircraft and hydrogen engines in parallel.
@davidgagnon26654 жыл бұрын
So no one is talking about the fact that eviation's prototype has caught fire.
@bryanlallen4 жыл бұрын
The Eviation Alice has always been “aspirational” but otherwise unrealistic. I’m sure their foreign investors are re-thinking their investment, and anticipate that Alice will never fly, at least in its present form with wingtip power plants.
@fliteshare4 жыл бұрын
@@bryanlallen Agree, that aircraft won't make it past the V1 cut test procedures, without an unrecoverable Vmc roll.
@Razor-gx2dq4 жыл бұрын
Did not know that.
@ichbrauchmehrkaffee57854 жыл бұрын
Hahaha, just like the Liliumjet, another electrical aircraft, I really hope we find a propper alternative for those fuckin' batteries
@Sir_Budginton4 жыл бұрын
@@bryanlallen Why did they even bother with wing tip engines? A two engine plane must be able to fly to certain parameters with one engine out, and having the engines on the wingtips means there will be a huge yawing force if an engine goes. So to counter this you need a massive vertical stabaliser, which is going to be heavy. Though interestingly, having the engines on the wingtips actually does make the wing structure lighter.
@CoastalBreed4 жыл бұрын
4:46 lets talk about that truck 😂
@iamdavism41634 жыл бұрын
The Truck is on a Wheelchair 😂😂😂
@oliverfalla184 жыл бұрын
I like how they didn't mention lobbies that are indefinitely making this a war of attrition
@kellynolen4984 жыл бұрын
Ohhh my i forgot about politics thats not going to be easy to overcome
@nightz58084 жыл бұрын
BOOOOOO POLITICS BOOOOOO
@MrVsingh7864 жыл бұрын
Largest all electric plane !! onwaymechanic.in/2020/05/30/worlds-largest-all-electric-plane-takes-a-revolutionary-flight-over-washington-e-caravan-magnix-aero-tech/
@tannercox45374 жыл бұрын
No only thing that holds this back is batteries being heavy af and no where close to efficient as combustion. It takes more natural gas to power a battery half the power as a combustion engine. Battery powered cars and big battery objects are worst for the environment than combustion. We need new energy sources but it’s clear you know nothing about energy and are just listening to democrats that lie more than republicans when it comes to energy.
@threeforthsstudios2 жыл бұрын
@@tannercox4537 Solar Power fixes the natural gas problem.
@califoreign2 жыл бұрын
@4:45 why is that truck floating!?
@AnchorGaurav4 жыл бұрын
1:45 My first thought: Is she drunk?
@ooupatek17604 жыл бұрын
She actin toasted 😭
@MathewZ7884 жыл бұрын
Me too bud 😂
@thefirstsin4 жыл бұрын
Lmao🤣
@iokuawa44464 жыл бұрын
probably italian
@milanstevic84244 жыл бұрын
@@iokuawa4446 she's Colombian by birth, but living in Florida. took me 3 and a half seconds of research.
@terrenceklaverweide63564 жыл бұрын
Tech insider: The future; 25 dollar tickets Ryanair: Am I a joke to you?
@diegoyuiop3 жыл бұрын
@Yazan Al-Saif but it says flying regional has become expensive even in Europe
@solidzack2 жыл бұрын
I've seen 9€ flights by RyanAir, took an 18€ flight from germany to spain myself. The train to the airport costs more than the flight itself. Low budget airlines are insane
@CityWhisperer4 жыл бұрын
As far as I'm concerned, certification is not an issue, specially in the US. I mean, just ask Boeing.
@balanced38264 жыл бұрын
Shots fired!
@cakraparindra46594 жыл бұрын
Burnt the right way..
@mp4f4 жыл бұрын
Dispatch, we’ve got a active shooter situation, we need backup
@kimjunguny4 жыл бұрын
I mean the plane was safe. They did speed up the training process though, and thats why people died. Basically since the pilots had limited experience with the plane they didn't know how to fix the problem that killed them. Boeing is very safe.
@CityWhisperer4 жыл бұрын
@@kimjunguny Bruh, Boeing sold that plane saying it was just another variant of the 737 family, that it could be flown by any pilot that already knew how to fly a 737 with little formation. Doing that put the lives of many in risk, and it cost 346 people their life. Now I don't know upto what point pilots know how their Boeing plane flies and if they actually know all the systems that are onboard.
@planecrazyanimations23952 жыл бұрын
The first flight was in 1903- On December 17, 1903, Wilbur and Orville Wright made four brief flights at Kitty Hawk with their first powered aircraft. The Wright brothers had invented the first successful airplane. The Wrights used this stopwatch to time the Kitty Hawk flights.
@OllieIbb4 жыл бұрын
"Tests early 2020" I guess thats not possible right now
@zonde29414 жыл бұрын
😂😂
@JohanEinevik4 жыл бұрын
Perfect time now when there is no competition for the airspace.
@zonde29414 жыл бұрын
@@JohanEinevik there are still flying lots of planes
@user-nameplease71634 жыл бұрын
That’s the point
@ryanzapalac74554 жыл бұрын
Toaster actually the eviation test plane that was here in the USA specifically in Prescott Arizona burned to the ground a few months back. The ground power unit it was hooked up to caught fire and then caught the plane on fire too. I drive by their building everyday and haven’t seen anything from them in months
@jamesliston56934 жыл бұрын
4:45 Did anyone notice something missing
@equation13214 жыл бұрын
James Liston the wheel?
@ViniciusVetor4 жыл бұрын
Rear license plate?
@jestertester69gaming544 жыл бұрын
The wings?
@ipratham04 жыл бұрын
What????? Two wheeler truck
@stella-m84494 жыл бұрын
The wings, oh dear.
@jeshie37364 жыл бұрын
4:46 had to rewind to make sure I saw that truck correctly
@Rutherford_Sam4 жыл бұрын
Wait
@elduardjazsalunga63074 жыл бұрын
wait what
@Pakzypaks4 жыл бұрын
Wth
@aamnaya3 жыл бұрын
HOW IS IT MOVING
@nicknolty37842 жыл бұрын
1:09 those are some badass special affects
@centauria91224 жыл бұрын
Now I'm just gonna wait until we could invent an electric rocket...
@IntelTV4 жыл бұрын
stop shut up.
@centauria91224 жыл бұрын
@@IntelTV That wasn't very "Intel"ligent of you.
@IntelTV4 жыл бұрын
@@centauria9122 How so?
@tamriel42434 жыл бұрын
Actually there is a electric jet engine in theory. Look it up.
@lukebalderose3344 жыл бұрын
Its not to far fetched. Look up project Breakthrough Star Shot
@captainjackpugh60504 жыл бұрын
“Hey tony I have an idea for an electric jet”. Elon Musk on Iron Man 2
@bvbxiong57914 жыл бұрын
seriously tho, Elon need to get on this project too. if anyone can make electric planes a reality sooner rather than later, it's Elon Musk.
@sherajr4 жыл бұрын
Tesla planes!
@kirra91524 жыл бұрын
Electric planes is already a realty. Elon musk might take it to commercial level. Might.
@adikuyand4 жыл бұрын
0:42 Lazy parents naming their child: Dad: How about John? Mom: That's Goodenough The Kid: John Goodenough XD
@michaelesposito26294 жыл бұрын
They gave their child a new last name huh?
@nebulai95874 жыл бұрын
@@michaelesposito2629 He's just different
@arihantbhattacharjee2 жыл бұрын
I think one solution is to distribute all the battery weight along the chassis in modules (e.g distributing twenty 250w/h batteries across a module that spreads across 1/5 of the airplane chassis and then using 5 of those modules to cover the entire chassis
@Deprotination4 жыл бұрын
The prototype for the eviation electric plane exploded at my airport while I was working there and released a cloud of toxic gas. I'm not anti electric and this did actually happen. I think it's an issue that needs to be addressed.
@finno36774 жыл бұрын
It caught fire, it didn’t explode. And they assume that ground equipment caused the fire. Stop spreading false rumors.
@shapshooter77692 жыл бұрын
Fuel fires are one thing, lithium fires are another
@tommurphy43072 жыл бұрын
@@shapshooter7769 i'm sure that damn ship with all the electric cars is still on fire- they should probably figure out where the hell that thing is and do something about it- like wipe out VW plants worldwide....
@tommurphy43072 жыл бұрын
eviation- the act of drilling for fine drinking water in france
@TonyEmil4 жыл бұрын
@4:47 is this a half car or I’m tripping?
@tousifzaman93924 жыл бұрын
Nah u fine, its just moded
@CaneSugarCane4 жыл бұрын
@@tousifzaman9392 how???
@tousifzaman93924 жыл бұрын
@@CaneSugarCane It has a big weight attached in front of it to tow aircrafts. Google with company name, you'll see more pics
@CaneSugarCane4 жыл бұрын
@@tousifzaman9392 thanks! You there mvp!
@heisenburger34264 жыл бұрын
If you want to reduce carbon emissions, then invest in something that has already proven to be perfectly efficient in almost the whole world except the US: Electric High speed rail
@steffanmevel65994 жыл бұрын
Or hyperloop!
@stephenmaniloff84934 жыл бұрын
Wrong See... China...Not enough riders
@Youtubeuser1aa4 жыл бұрын
It takes me 5 hours from LAX to BWI. How long is train?
@は私です彼の名前4 жыл бұрын
Stephen Maniloff Because their economy is a farce and no one can AFFORD to ride them.
@kentclark64204 жыл бұрын
The gas industry shut down many rail systems that weren't using gas or diesel. We used to have electric trains.
@SpinosaurusStudios_2 жыл бұрын
How to get around heavy batteries: 1. Use solar panel. 2. Make it the primary income of energy. 3. Use a single double A battery as power storage. 4. Profit.
@optimumtechhd32904 жыл бұрын
The solar cell converts sunlight into electricity, ... or as AeroVironment likes to say, the plane is powered by it's shadow.
@yxcvbnmmnbvcxy5444 жыл бұрын
"powered by it's shadow" wow that sounds deep
@francestod.tandocjr40924 жыл бұрын
Solars panels cap around 40% efficiency. Not enough to power a plane.
@tommurphy43072 жыл бұрын
@@francestod.tandocjr4092 he knew that- it was a swipe at aerovironment- haha
@abdulazizalserhani76254 жыл бұрын
2:13 that computer on the left is from the 90s not from the 80s an 80s computer would have no CD-ROM drive, having floppy drives and a non-curved case, Is it true?
@pbjracing14yearsago494 жыл бұрын
1:46 the energy conservation from stored electric energy energy to the motors is far more efficient than traditional jet engines (or any system that turns the stored chemical energy into movement). Because of this, the specific energy of batteries doesn't have to be the same as gasoline.
@glorious_help4 жыл бұрын
PB&J Racing • 13 years ago you still need lots of batteries, added weight... efficiency alone can’t offset the fuel energy density and weight advantage at the moment
@ChristopherBurtraw2 жыл бұрын
That's why the video said it needs to get to 800 while jetfuel is at 12,000. This was addressed.
@razzor47082 жыл бұрын
Jet engine ,turbine, turbofan and etc. is 100 times more efficient on useful work then propeller connected to electric motor, reliable, robust, and power to weight it can carry proves outdated ideology behind making all electric E-Plane is not reliable, not sustainable and not durable equipment Its ideology of Left wing politician making this pushed hard, and everything that pushed hard never worked anywhere. There zero practicality, only political agenda
@magneteesa4 жыл бұрын
These guys: this is so hard Elon musk: hold my tesla dealership
@flaskwater444 жыл бұрын
It's simple: Hit the plane with lightning to recharge it, duh.
@Adrenaline_chaser4 жыл бұрын
Clever!! 😂 😂. Why didn't i think about it? Here's a like 👍🏼 to you!
@mp4f4 жыл бұрын
Jose Guevarra big brain
@deluxe55654 жыл бұрын
Big PP
@Hurricane8004 жыл бұрын
*Want a scholarship?*
@childs4sale3364 жыл бұрын
Wait thats....genius
@StanVanGundy14 жыл бұрын
Narrator: They still haven’t taken off Me : Aha see what you did there
@ozzyfromspace4 жыл бұрын
4:46 Truck rendering at 56% 🤭 *screams in confusion*
@robospider994 жыл бұрын
That's an actual vehicle
@yohannesbalcha22454 жыл бұрын
@@robospider99 what's it called. It's defying physics
@oxyo35314 жыл бұрын
the wheels are on the front of the metal thing
@PitsTasteGood2 жыл бұрын
I like how people are complaining that we can't make a 100% jump to electric power when the Prius exists. Isn't a lot of the fuel wasted during takeoff? Compared to the rest of the flight, taking off uses the largest amount of fuel per distance traveled. So, if there is some sort of way to hybridize turbo props, you can switch to hybrid power for takeoff. And the propellers can potentially spin an alternator that allows for the hybrid battery to recharge mid-flight. If the system works out, turbo props could be the future.
@marcosmedia74634 жыл бұрын
Elon Musk: Why not rocket travel? It's faster and cheaper.
@lilmcnoggy14394 жыл бұрын
R u sure its cheap?
@iwilldielater48944 жыл бұрын
@@lilmcnoggy1439 to elon musk ofc, its a joke
@lilmcnoggy14394 жыл бұрын
@@iwilldielater4894 oh... Ok i get it XD
@AYUSH-pq9ld4 жыл бұрын
"Once in a Lifetime Experience"
@jelo13604 жыл бұрын
Flying from LA to NYC in dead 10 seconds 😂 😂
@HieroOnymos4 жыл бұрын
4:46 I can't figure out that truck. Where's the back?
@mateospennati3504 жыл бұрын
Glitch
@PositronVI4 жыл бұрын
The truck is held on a forklift like frame. So it doesn't need a back
@addnan64944 жыл бұрын
A max range of 500-600 miles really means they will be flying significantly less than that for redundancy
@bergssprangare4 жыл бұрын
It's not about batteries only..A multi engine wing increase efficiency
@xgamergamer72824 жыл бұрын
4:45 wtf was that ?!🤔
@tousifzaman93924 жыл бұрын
A moded truck :P
@weaponofmassconstruction19404 жыл бұрын
His ex-wife has the other half. It was a messy divorce.
@maxcarter86064 жыл бұрын
if u weren’t annoying everyone on here commenting, you will watch the video and find out
@FullTekAuto4 жыл бұрын
Jet fuel engine: I’ll never be retired.. Electric engine: At least I can dream Anti Matter Engine: Yes
@FullTekAuto4 жыл бұрын
Although it’s looking like electric multi ion thrusters are the future
@killman3695474 жыл бұрын
I would not want to be *anywhere* near an anti-matter engine. If the magnetic confinement fails or air gets in for any reason it'll explode like a hydrogen bomb.
@Hrodryc4 жыл бұрын
@@killman369547 assuming that at these point of technology we probably could control matter, so the prevention of generating huge explosions due to malfunction of the engine may be a security check for the companies before launching it to the market, just crazy ideas
@fouadtahio4 жыл бұрын
If you look at tesla cars now, they both conserve weight and produce significantly greater power than petrol (tesla roadster). If you take this info on a larger scale i think Elon has the knowledge and ability to produce an all electric aircraft which produces a significant amount of power normal aircrafts while conserving weight. Maybe start with an hybrid?
@snowleopard94634 жыл бұрын
Elon be like: - Electric cars - Electric planes - Electric rockets - Electric Earth - Electric Mars Oh I get it now. Elon starts with E and Electric starts with E
@averagejoe60314 жыл бұрын
Electric rockets...yeah that ones almost never gonna happen. Elon even said it himself
@gregorymalchuk2724 жыл бұрын
@@averagejoe6031 Ion engines and VASIMR already exist or are on the drawing board. But they are not going to be used to get off earth to get to orbit.
@Rutherford_Sam4 жыл бұрын
@@gregorymalchuk272 Ion engine is very weak , it's only going to be used on satellite for course correction.
@justarandomweeb32204 жыл бұрын
@@Rutherford_Sam i hate your name lol
@constellation-sj8xn3 жыл бұрын
*E*
@gab8823 жыл бұрын
The "special effects" are so cute in this video. Fits her voice too
@brasik4 жыл бұрын
I feel like its gonna change really soon because of the development of graphene batteries.
@pkramer9624 жыл бұрын
Goodenough, that's an interesting name for an inventor.
@AustinSmith-fo8jg4 жыл бұрын
4:45 Who took the back of the car off?
@rpaleg2 жыл бұрын
0:43 "store more power" 1:53 "hold power"
@MegaAchraf114 жыл бұрын
Everyone else: CORONAVIRUS Tech insider: Why don’t we have electric planes?
@memeteam44974 жыл бұрын
0:41 some say John didn’t do well as an inventor, although most say John b good enough
@napalm_vietcong_21094 жыл бұрын
“What’s keeping them grounded” Me: well, WiFi, and power to keep inside the house because of the coronavirus.
@whitestonerboy98532 жыл бұрын
if the battery is so heavy put it in the middle of the plane, so it has a balance in the front and back or instead of using 1 big one do 2 front and back
@chancethef4pp3r4 жыл бұрын
“We will be test flying the plane in early 2020” I feel kinda bad now...
@bedshitter69464 жыл бұрын
Man. Damn Covid-19 ruined shit again
@ryanzapalac74554 жыл бұрын
actually the eviation test plane that was here in the USA specifically in Prescott Arizona burned to the ground a few months back. The ground power unit it was hooked up to caught fire and then caught the plane on fire too. I drive by their building everyday and haven’t seen anything from them in months
@chancethef4pp3r4 жыл бұрын
Ryan Zapalac I was talking about quarantine...
@keeli55754 жыл бұрын
I dont think there has ever been a serious thought on battery powered planes. Most companies are pursuing hydrogen, by either a fuel or a fuel cell design. It's just better.
@shapshooter77692 жыл бұрын
Yes, the power density is there, just not as much as Jet A or Jet B. Huge upgrade from batteries though.
@tommurphy43072 жыл бұрын
as a fuel? i'm not going on THAT plane...
@리주민4 жыл бұрын
Why not just leave plugged in to a huge extension cord? Can fly back and forth. Just try not to tangle the cords with other planes.
@FMHikari4 жыл бұрын
The weight of such cord would destabilize the whole thing the further it goes
@djninja24254 жыл бұрын
@@FMHikari im pretty sure they were making a joke
@kingsly10312 жыл бұрын
It'll be a wired plane
@suddenlysolo21702 жыл бұрын
The main seaplane operator on Canada's west coast (Harbour Air) begins operating its first electric plane this year and plans for a fully electric fleet ready to transport passengers in 2023.
@aariaMB4 жыл бұрын
"Will be testing the plane in flight in early 2020" covid-19: "YEET"
@oh0stv4 жыл бұрын
Tech Insider: Form ppl without knowledge in technology, for ppl without knowledge in technology...
@tan_k4 жыл бұрын
Can someone please explain how can electric planes reduce CO2 emissions significantly? One still has to charge the batteries and the majority of power stations on this planet are still coal powered. Also producing the batteries itself emit a lot of CO2?
@tommurphy43072 жыл бұрын
youre getting ahead of all the einsteins.... i think you are wrong about coal- at least I HOPE you are....
@tan_k2 жыл бұрын
@@tommurphy4307 I hope I am wrong too. But as far as I know, electric airplanes are still in infancy even today; they don’t offer any reduced CO2 emissions if you consider the complete lifecycle. Even if they do (which they don’t), the cost of the vehicle, carrying capacity and distance covered on a single charge are some of the factors which are preventing them from entering the main stream.
@hyun11412 жыл бұрын
I got distracted by that bangin track that started right after the intro
@KakkoiSan4 жыл бұрын
Graphene battery is the future baby!
@seth16654 жыл бұрын
i was looking for this comment. I like that there is a huge gap in regional flying markets for someone to really invest heavily into graphene bc that will make them become a reality.
@ktlnz84444 жыл бұрын
“This would be a problem for the next ahhh-undred years.” ***Twitching intensifies***
@jelo13604 жыл бұрын
Hold up
@Potrimpo2 жыл бұрын
I'd like to point out some places are so remote, neither roads nor trains are an option, and the best option is through either boat or planes. And electric planes may be the best option, especially for emergencies.
@thatoneguy87922 жыл бұрын
Put the batteries in power-saving mode, that should fix the job
@germanrudecindo33824 жыл бұрын
This video: Why We Still Don't Have Electric Planes? Elon Musk: still I don't want one.
@cplpetergriffin15834 жыл бұрын
Elon’s been talking about electric planes for awhile now. But he only hypes shit up not deliver results
@germanrudecindo33824 жыл бұрын
@@cplpetergriffin1583 he said on an interview that still there are some things that need improvement to make a affordable electric airplane, things such as battey etc.
@jebise11264 жыл бұрын
wile other companies actually make flying planes...
@germanrudecindo33824 жыл бұрын
@@jebise1126 show me a good one sir.
@ItsJamMan4 жыл бұрын
Summary: Slow, Hard to manufacture, Hard to maintain, and too heavy
@EternusTV4 жыл бұрын
I wouldn't trust a bloody energizer to take me over the Atlantic.
@caesar77343 жыл бұрын
0:03 “$25 tickets” Ryanair: “Am I a joke to you?”
@edrijulleza71314 жыл бұрын
4:46 has anyone seen the towing car that has no half of its body but still drives..really wierd
@Dubai892JK4 жыл бұрын
That was the work of devil
@JohnSmith-kj2od4 жыл бұрын
"Oops I forgot the charger at home"
@HughDarkwave4 жыл бұрын
Graphene is the answer
@jelo13604 жыл бұрын
“Shoot, I forgot to add the backup engine...”
@martepz78694 жыл бұрын
Tony Stark: Still having problems with batteries? Okay fine I'll let have my Arc Reactor, I'm dead anyway.
@ponycentaur14562 жыл бұрын
AND battery replacement is also a big hurdle. As time passes, the range of the plane goes down due to the battery becoming less likely to charge . So takes longer to charge and less range over time. Replacement can be easy, but costly and time consuming for big companies that have to rotate. In addition , each state has thier own laws for battery recycling (if they have any for vehicles specifically).
@Itsfalcon94 жыл бұрын
Lol whoever wrote this had those puns in the beginning loaded up their whole life