My Yiayia came to this country during the depression when she was just 17. She and my Papou were married and she NEVER wore pants in her life!! Always a dress! God bless her, she even cut her grass in her slippers and housecoat (below the knee!!) She was truly an amazing woman, strong and faithful to God. She taught me everything she knew about the Orthodox faith and being a Lady! I truly miss her 😢❤
@marieegypt709110 ай бұрын
Praying that the new Antiochian Metropolitan gets rid of the dog collars and more priests wear cassocks!!
@xxFairestxx10 ай бұрын
God willing….please do this
@orthodox171710 ай бұрын
100% !
@borremoonkey10 ай бұрын
Which Metropolitan?
@acekoala45710 ай бұрын
@@borremoonkey Either Saba or Nikolai. Those are the "Newest" Metropolitans
@borremoonkey10 ай бұрын
@acekoala457 ah ok. Antiochians under Met. Saba, then a more pressing matter over the collars would be ceasing communion between the Monophysites.
@xrpsmith802110 ай бұрын
I live in Missouri where freezing and below freezIng temperatures are common in the winter months. Ladies: you can wear leggings or pants under your skirts or dresses. It works very well. Also please cover your heads in church. Look at the icons of our Most Holy Theotokos. Her beautiful head is always covered and her mouth is closed. She is our example of humility and holiness. Please copy her.
@danielgaley967610 ай бұрын
Well said!
@Evamariaeva-y1e10 ай бұрын
I heard such a beautiful comparison recently! Mother was explaining her young daughter why she has to wear dresses and skirts while other Girls wear jeans. One of the things she said was...When are your hands warmer, when you wear mittens or gloves?She said mittens. Mother answered, excatly when your fingers are close to each other they warm each other:) so it is with wearing skirts in winter time:)
@Ασημίνα-Μίνα10 ай бұрын
Ο Χριστός μας να σε ευλογεί. ✝️🇬🇷
@hannahdavia87919 ай бұрын
Yes and petticoats are a great way to keep warm. Layering your skirts is very warm ❤
@fruitfulmotherhood9 ай бұрын
I live in a cold climate and wear skirts / dresses year round. In winter I wear a wool skirt, wool petticoat, and wool tights and I'm warmer than when I used to wear pants! In summer I wear linen dresses to stay completely covered but cool.
@orthodox171710 ай бұрын
These lessons really help realize how FAR we've fallen away from God. Lord have mercy.
@Alex-hz2xg8 ай бұрын
Metropolitan Neophytos of Morphou said that a Great Synod after a Great War will restore all the issues we have in the Church. Issues and abnormals of last decades but even centuries will be restored. So perhaps restoration will have an effect in all layers of society. Everything we know now and what we got adapted to now, only exists since a very short time. Jeans only exist since the end of the 19th century. There are many things we consider normal which are not because of the times we live in and were born in, unfortunately. The antichrist uses very small steps, step by step, to eventually arrive at a point of no return and capture us. But God will restore everything back to normal soon!
@daan833610 ай бұрын
In my city, winter temperatures of -20°C are not uncommon. So I wear cosy maxi dresses, thick leggings, and a long down coat that's tied at the waist. Cold weather is really no excuse to start wearing pants, ladies.
@captainmartin121913 сағат бұрын
Woman don't need any excuse to wear pants. There is nothing biblically wrong with doing so.
@considerthis202310 ай бұрын
Makeup is another one of those things that women should use sparingly or not at all. That is part of modesty.
@georgemixis217210 ай бұрын
My wife and I raised our daughters to always wear dresses (and the boys to wear pants ~ of course). Some have opposed that thought with, "Well, in Bible days, all men and women wore robes." That response has always been a blanket statement without any research. Back then, men and women wore distinctly different attire (let alone "robes"); and could be discerned from a distance. Another point some have shared with me is, "What about the Greek shepherds, and the Scotsmen in their kilts?" However, only the men wore that item of clothing and the women wore very modest and concealing clothing. It is no surprise that the Scripture mentions the act of homosexuality and men wearing feminine attire (and vice versa) both as abominations. The natural and God-given gender and identity of the person is distorted... Sometimes, in the middle of such discussions, I counter with, " bring your son here, and he can wear one of my daughters' dresses; then we'll take a walk in public." That seems to sink in the whole nature of the topic. God bless!
@Cobruh_Commander10 ай бұрын
Men have worn short tunics for practical reasons throughout the ages, not for some perverse reason. The Kilt is not to be mocked by outsiders. However, the Kilt itself was not commonly worn by Scotsmen, it was normally worn by the Highland Regiments.
@Србомбоница869 ай бұрын
@@Cobruh_Commanderthose tunics are not shaped as those that us women wear ,they are completely male clothes ,Arabs wear it
@QuacklifeK9 ай бұрын
So what your saying is you’re okay with men walking around in flow-y pink pants with a floral print on them and a blouse to top it off?😂 There is some truth to the blanket statement. Head coverings, facial hair, and weapons were usually the biggest differences aside from the occasional varying length of the garb.
@captainmartin121913 сағат бұрын
Not so sure I agree with you on this brother. Men and woman wore tunics. Yes, the woman's version was different, but the point being made is they both wore a robe like garment. Now if you made the argument that woman should wear a different style of pants made specifically for woman and not wear men's pants okay. If your saying woman can't wear pants at all I think the argument falls apart. The crazy thing is pants were not originally considered a male garment. In fact, they came about because people wanted protection while riding horses. Both men and woman wore actually wore pants. In fact, more of the early versions of pants were worn by both sexes until someone decided that pants should only be for men. If were going by the bible, then we simply would be saying that woman have to wear pants specifically made for woman and not wear men's pants. Crazy thing is that most ancient men in Israel did not even wear pants. The only people who wore something similar to pants were the priest who wore breeches that only went to the knees that were covered up by their tunics. I feel this is a personal preference that people are attempting to make into a biblical command. In fact, the very scripture people usually quote are generally in the Old Testament. A covenant between the Jewish people and God that has nothing to do with gentiles or other nations.
@sunyrodriguez10 ай бұрын
And crop tops... a nightmare!
@sharonwalters61359 ай бұрын
Shocking!!!
@tubalcain687410 ай бұрын
I recently turned 66, and I've noticed a trend where I live of older women dressing like teenage girls when out and about. I wonder if this is happening elsewhere?
@m.fisher695010 ай бұрын
I am not orthodox, but I appreciate this clip. our congregation believes women should wear a dress and also not to cut their hair. For their hair is given to them for a covering.
@zaarongaming817410 ай бұрын
Nature itself teaches this
@LadyMaria10 ай бұрын
I cut my hair, the ends need it and I prefer bangs so gotta cut those.
@nickkerinklio823910 ай бұрын
@@LadyMariayou have good taste in hairstyles
@LadyMaria10 ай бұрын
@@nickkerinklio8239 Simple and easy.
@Marstang2210 ай бұрын
Also I believe women and men should have their own gyms. Been thinking about this. Just seems right. So if women want to wear different clothes for workouts, they can and men dont have to see it. Idk just my thoughts. Great video though. Totally agree. Needs to be boundaries.
@clmberserker24510 ай бұрын
I'm a guy. Yes please.
@pincermovement7210 ай бұрын
And schools
@nyc_girl_in_london92510 ай бұрын
This brought memories of Lucille Roberts, the gym for women only I went to 25 years ago in Brooklyn, NY. Men need their own spaces too. The young women today are out of control.
@clmberserker24510 ай бұрын
@@pincermovement72 this too. very underrated. i'm curious as how they'd score in terms of bullying. i think it might be a possibility that boys bully other boys more when there are girls around in order to garner attention
@Ioannikios17410 ай бұрын
Absolutely. Men and women shouldn't be doing physical exercise in the same room for very obvious reasons.
@y-vf724410 ай бұрын
Well said Father. I see that some women are beginning to cover their heads outside the home as well. (Orthodox women used to normally cover their heads as well. ) These things all help women to pursue chastity, modesty and humility.
@TheodoreIosifidis-gx4qb10 ай бұрын
Doesn’t it make more sense they covered their hair with mandili because they worked the fields all day and didn’t want to get dirty not the humility.
@Cobruh_Commander10 ай бұрын
@@TheodoreIosifidis-gx4qb It works for both.
@Србомбоница869 ай бұрын
@@TheodoreIosifidis-gx4qbno ,it's humility and copying Holy Theotokos,She is our guide ❤
@TheodoreIosifidis-gx4qb9 ай бұрын
@@Србомбоница86 spoken like someone who never even seen a field forget worked one. Go to trabzon and see how those women work in the fields and then come at me again
@sharonwalters61359 ай бұрын
Man looks on the outside..God looks at the heart ❤
@leoandolino46689 ай бұрын
That is the problem. We men look at the outside and try to keep our minds pure. Not easy in the USA.
@Geralt40010 ай бұрын
When the major Christian institutions like the Orthodox Church make bold and necessary statements like these the smaller churches will follow. If Orthodoxy will maintain consistency, people will leave the other denominations like Lutheranism to Orthodoxy and the other denominations like Lutheranism or Anglicanism will follow in the Orthodox example or become barren.
@dianablackman452810 ай бұрын
Agree. It has been a very slippery slope. Unfortunately the wearing of pants as a woman is a very ingrained habit. It's all about convenience and habit. I love the idea of being traditional, going back to that spiritual place.
@melonyrobinson99449 ай бұрын
In many traditions, men wore dresses, so....
@toomanybooks110 ай бұрын
Thank you for this, Fr Peter!
@Mark-i9k5i10 ай бұрын
In my town it seems only the Amish girls dress 👗 like a true Christian women this is very bad
@alohi_xiengboree2 ай бұрын
Genuine question: I'm considering this advice, and I would like to know if it is also incorrect to wear pants UNDER a dress?
@jollygoodgordon55809 ай бұрын
When fr posted this on IG there were women who were defending wearing pants. It’s amazing, it shows how rebellious some women are, even some who claim to be Christian. And it also shows how normal it has become in society, like, it’s not even seen as immodest, when most pants for women are tight.
@reginasynodinos10 ай бұрын
Thank you so much father Heers for standing up for the truth. How else are we going to fix the mess the world is in if we do not start in the house of God first. I love you 💕
@ally18169 ай бұрын
What a good point, as a young woman who has to wear pants for work i often forget the importance of wearing more feminine clothes outside of just church.
@improvisedchaos89045 ай бұрын
lot of female comments boil down to either A: "You are mean." or B: "I am recognized as a woman and gain male attention for wearing a dress - i should wear pants (become more masculine) so that I no longer have men that want me."
@Razamaniac10 ай бұрын
Santa Matrona of Russia once gathered women around her cell yard and tutored them not to dress in modernity, not paint their faces, nor comp their hair improperly, nor wear men's clothes like pants, because for everyone of these acts there is a cloud of demons that will accuse them in from of the hly court in the time of their soul tolling. And a woman then thought, not spoken loud of it, but just thought inside her mind that ''is it bad to wear pant when I just go out in nmy backyard and tend to my garden? Pants help me very much with the works around the house.'' And before she finished her thought, Santa matuska turn to her (Santa Matrona was blind), and said: ''you will be accused exactly for that''. And the woman froze in fear.
@tayh.623510 ай бұрын
And I could also make up goofy things like that. "You'll be accused by demons if you eat popcorn with salted butter. Unsalted is okay, but salted is evil!!!!!!!" We struggle enough with keeping the commands that are actually in the scriptures, so why don't we stick with those first before we go adding on arbitrary things?
@acekoala45710 ай бұрын
@@tayh.6235 Modesty is a command in Scripture. It's not arbitrary. The Apostolic Canons forbid makeup, androgynous dress, shaving, and many other things prevalent in today's society.
@tayh.623510 ай бұрын
@@acekoala457 ask first whether the thing's connotation has changed. For instance, makeup can be done quite subtlety or it can be done garishly. Back centuries ago it was associated only with loose moral character, so of course Christian women would have been right to avoid it. In current times, modesty would say to avoid that makeup which is associated with promiscuity (think a Kardashian type look) but that a little mascara and naturally tinted lipgloss isn't going to create a negative opinion. To ignore the principal behind a rule will lead to an incoherent lifestyle. Technology, customs, etc are ever changing. We have to look at the virtues we are to live out and then apply those wisely to our specific contexts. I'm not advocating tossing out all traditions, but we need to move careful about turning every custom into an unchanging particular.
@OrthodoxEthos10 ай бұрын
@@tayh.6235 Simple hearts simply obey.
@acekoala45710 ай бұрын
@@tayh.6235 Modern makeup practices, which is what it is, comes from the Color Revolution Bloc, which is inherently Marxist and therefore Anathematized, and we shouldn't be getting our practices from Non-Christian Sources. So I don't think it's a stretch to connect it to Promiscuity. If we look at our Faith through a modernist lense then we will lose it.
@ICXC_Humbly10 ай бұрын
It's so crazy to me that as a millennial I actually get started at certain places due to wearing clothing that was considered 'the norm' for women only 30 years ago. (Long sleeve blouses with long skirts!)
@boyar303310 ай бұрын
I am considered as a backwater medieval man for thinking like this by my family 😂. But deep inside me I know it is how it's supposed to be, how it always has been.
@andreahoehmann19399 ай бұрын
Almost everywhere in the world, men wear trousers and women are at least free to choose what they wear. They often choose skirts or dresses. This is also true in non-Christian contexts, for example in Japan. So the explanation for this phenomenon must have a basis in ethnology, not in the Bible.
@sharonwalters61359 ай бұрын
I am a little surprised and shocked that God didn’t put a dress or at least tights on women and pants on Adam when he made them !! 😮
@kaidenhall27185 ай бұрын
The concept of clothes wasn’t a thing yet
@paulk80729 ай бұрын
A woman wearing pants is a red flag. Even Saint Paisios condemns it.
@johnsambo93799 ай бұрын
Some jobs require it for women.
@maryann11879 күн бұрын
I think all medical/dental professionals would disagree! Our jobs require scrubs!
@marelkrs9 ай бұрын
Father i have a question,can we still wear pants underneath dresses? I mean sth like loose sweatpants or similar loose items. Because i really dont want to wear tights or leggins all the time when its cold. And same goes for summer, can we wear shorts underneath dresses?
@cherokeehippie9 ай бұрын
Just have to say I hate dresses…I felt naked wearing them..and it has been the opposite for me..I wear pants and long t shirts! Never was into men or marrying. Believe it or not, I’m a 57 year old virgin! And happy that way! I wore a nice dress one time at a wedding and felt very u comfortable with some man looking at me. I was also inappropriately touched by a pervert waiter at hotel in Turkey when I wore a dress for dinner. So I think I’ll stick to pants and long t-shirts!
@user-en6zl1cm5r8 ай бұрын
I also feel naked wearing dresses and yes, they DO make you an object of attention unless you're wearing Islamic clothing.
@joannajones853310 ай бұрын
So True father Peter!! Very helpful and totally agree - thank You!
@stephencrawford270910 ай бұрын
My wife has always worn dresses and head coverings, especially outside the home. I am honestly amazed by the cognitive dissonance at our church, where women wear long skirts and head coverings in service and then change into jeans for fellowship and catechumen classes. It amazes me. I basically don't hang out with some people because i know I'll judge them. Don't know what to do other than pray. My wife and i figured it out as Protestants just reading the Bible. It's not hard.
@captainmartin121912 сағат бұрын
The problem is nothing in the bible actually says woman can't wear pants. I would argue that this is a misunderstanding that's being wrongly applied.
@stephencrawford270911 сағат бұрын
@captainmartin1219 I believe you misunderstand me. There's nothing that specifically says they can't wear just a bikini to church either. We have to look at what constituted modesty at that time period to understand the context of what St Paul is saying. The Church held to that standard for the overwhelming majority of its history. It's only very recently that some people have started to change, in the last hundred years or so. So, by implication, when St Paul ordered women to dress modestly, to a 1st century Jew/Roman, that would exclude wearing pants.
@captainmartin12193 сағат бұрын
@@stephencrawford2709 First you say there is nothing prohibited woman from wearing a bikinis to church then you mentioned Pail preaching about modesty which would actually be the easiest argument against woman wearing a bikini so you actually made an food argument against the specific point you raised yourself. I find it strange that you would compare a bikini some of which are very revealing to pants which often fully cover a woman's body. I am not sure I get the argument you trying to make with that comparison to be honest. I also do not see why woman wearing pants would not be modest. As long as the woman is fully covered what's the issue with pants. I'm fact I think this is the weakest argument I have heard against woman wearing pants. Usually people use the old testament which is a bad argument imo,but far better than this one. Sorry but what you saying here sounds more like some one with a personal preference looking for biblical backing to support their preference.
@stephencrawford270940 минут бұрын
@captainmartin1219 wow you're dense. I said in order to understand modesty you have to understand the context and culture, because morons like you will say, "well technically there's no passage in the Bible that says they can't wear pants." So I replied, "Yeah, well if we're just talking about specific wording, it doesn't say anything about bikinis either." Do you see how dumb your initial argument was? It's not personal preference either. This is what Christians have done for 2000 years and still do in many parts of the world. You won't be able to contradict that historical fact. Quit playing games and become a Christian.
@Megavinicius11 сағат бұрын
I recently wanted to become a christian yet i were a femboy... I am straight but i like being pretty over being masculine and buff... What should i do? Is bein a femboy despite willing to be straight a sin? (Should i pull out the griffith type of style? Would that also be a sin?)
@patrikcargaАй бұрын
What about when say you go for a walk in mountians or something like that? I'd think it's okay then?
@OrthobroJames10 ай бұрын
There needs to be distinction, otherwise it's a mirage as to what constitutes male clothing and female clothing in the modern world. Then if it's a mirage it's no better than the secular subjectivism, there needs to be order. Are we all willing to conform to God and the order of the church, or to just be agnostic and say it doesn't matter? God help us!
@hesicast10 ай бұрын
Not that I disagree with everything, but trousers were considered undergarments until about the 1400s. Originally they were considered barbaric. We wore Byzantine tunics. It kind of reminds me of when I was young and I'd go to Greece the old men would not take their shirts off at the beach. I think men are the ill example by being immodest. At this point I think it's too late for women to not wear pants in the western world. Until something great can happen I can touch their hearts and they can become self-modest without us telling them. I feel today it's very difficult to communicate most things with the fairer sex. I think that's why I keep seeing more men in church than women right now. I think we need to be examples through actions and not speech. I don't know it's very difficult
@eh334510 ай бұрын
I really appreciate it-as a woman-the verbal instruction from good priests like Fr. Heers. I was never taught these things as a young person and Im trying to correct my life. How would I ever know unless someone was willing to speak up? Yet, example is so important too. Both are important.
@hesicast10 ай бұрын
@@eh3345 I totally agree. When I was talking to men, I wasn't talking about priests. I know I know men are priests. I find that a lot of the men have become a little zealous and constantly berate the women. By self-modesty for women I mean listening to the church fathers and spiritual mothers. Thank God for Father Peter hears and all the fathers of the church and spiritual mothers. Keep listening. I just met Layman. From them right now I think they need prayer and support. You know what I mean?
@eh334510 ай бұрын
@@hesicast yes, praying for everyone!
@oveylia7408Ай бұрын
I always wear a dress to church but private I do wear jeans I should change that. I have lots of wool dresses for the winter. How does everyone feel about a veil ? In my church in Canada very few people wear a veil. In the Russian Orthodox Church it’s more common.
@grLaurakp10 ай бұрын
This Video was so helpful to me, I wanted to start for a long time now my modest „girly era”. I would like to see a video about Make up and what Father Peter has to say about it. Thank you so much! ☺️
@eh334510 ай бұрын
It is not a good idea for women to wear make-up. Health wise, it is filled with chemicals you put on your skin which gets absorbed into the body. Then, spiritually, it is vanity. Think of where make-up began in biblical times-with those women who were harlots! They were trying to attract men for the wrong reasons. You may not have the same reasons but you may have the same response from men that you dont want, or hopefully dont want.
@Nick-ij5nt10 ай бұрын
I agree that men shouldn't wear women's clothing and vice versa but isn't the perception of gendered clothing relative? In some countries men wear dresses, so who is the arbiter of what consists of "male clothing"?
@TyranyFighterPatriot10 ай бұрын
But the traditions of what was female attire and what was male attire is clear as pure glass if you observe historical standards.
@Nick-ij5nt10 ай бұрын
@@TyranyFighterPatriot So society is what determines what male and female clothing is?
@melonyrobinson99449 ай бұрын
I agree. As others in the comments have pointed out, Jesus never wore pants, so maybe men should all be wearing dresses, actually
@Nick-ij5nt9 ай бұрын
@@melonyrobinson9944 I absolutely hate pants, especially jeans. As a man they're so constricting and uncomfortable. I think those thobe things that Muslims wear might be pretty nice.
@christopherherman379810 ай бұрын
Without even disagreeing with the premise I don't see what justification is given except that it's traditional to have gender specific clothing, what we might now call "pants and dresses" although the form of those distinct clothing have changes over the centuries. My girlfriend stopped wearing pants and short shorts, etc. and started wearing skirts once she went back to the Church, her rationale given "it displeases Our Lady" and I find no fault with that, but as a doctrinal issue, I think it needs a deeper dive than five minutes.
@eh334510 ай бұрын
I got a lot out of this quick overview! And sent it to my daughter who would NOT have been willing to watch a deeper dive, Im sure.
@GCarty8020 күн бұрын
I'd say if we want to look at the question historically the answer would be "women wear dresses because they're more pregnancy-friendly, while men wear pants because they're more convenient for riding a horse". Note that one of the few traditional outfits including pants that was also worn by women (the shalwar kameez) originated with the very equestrian Turco-Mongol cultures, even if it is now more associated with South Asia.
@crossofintimidation10 ай бұрын
St. Paul writes the head coverings are because of the glory and wonder of women which is so profound it caused the Angels to fall.
@JasonGeorgiouGaming10 ай бұрын
where
@Ασημίνα-Μίνα10 ай бұрын
Αυτό δεν είναι αλήθεια... Οι Άγγελοι εξεπεσαν λόγω υπερηφάνειας επειδή ο Θεός τους ζήτησε να προσκυνησουν όλοι τον Αδαμ και ο Εωσφόρος και το τάγμα του αρνήθηκαν.
@improvisedchaos89045 ай бұрын
ive heard the long hair conceals their faces as they pray, so angels who come and listen- are not pulled astray by her beauty.
@theherbalsanctuary81110 ай бұрын
its a little hard to wear a dress and run or work out. however, there is an Jewish orthodox line of clothing that makes modest workout wear that had a skirt that is just below the knee and then leggings under it, and the top is not tight fitting and covers the collar bone. I'm 60 years old now and I wear pants most of the time because I have arthritis in my foot and I have to wear tennis shoes so I can walk. tennis shoes look a bit strange with a dress.
@eh334510 ай бұрын
Many women wear tennis shoes with skirts-no excuse. :-)
@Maria-Ortodoxa10 ай бұрын
What do you think God is thinking about your "tennis shoes look a bit strange with a dress"?
@theherbalsanctuary81110 ай бұрын
@eh3345 Right, then I go to church and get ripped for wearing tennis shoes to church. It's a no win situation. I think Jesus cares more about what's in my heart than what I wear as long as it is modest. There will come a time that you will neither worship on the mountain or in a place but in spirit. Adam and Eve were naked then used fig leafs. I think it is beautiful and wonderful to see women in church in dresses and their head covered. It's just not workable for some .
@Maria-Ortodoxa10 ай бұрын
@@theherbalsanctuary811 Do you not know what Jesus does to lukewarm people? Pants are not modest on a woman. Nor is the desire to please people rather than God, or fashion.
@theherbalsanctuary81110 ай бұрын
@@Maria-Ortodoxa I really do respect your view, when I say ripped, I wore sneakers once with a skirt and the clergy got on me for wearing sneakers. I explained my situation and he didn't seem like he understood. that's what I mean by a no win situation.
@johnsambo93799 ай бұрын
Women wearing pants or jeans is not considered masculine. It's better than booty shorts and leggings Some jobs alo require women to wear pants.
@SushiiDraws10 ай бұрын
This can't be real...💀
@melonyrobinson99449 ай бұрын
I can assure you most orthodox priests wouldn't advocate this
@Karine7002 ай бұрын
You know it is the first time I hear the explanation of why back in the days about 100 back in Canada why women would never wear pants.
@symeondk10 ай бұрын
Historically men and women did not always wear pants and dresses respectfully because fashion had changed overtime. Yet while men wear skirts they did always wear gender appropriate clothes.
@levitatingpotato10910 ай бұрын
A tunic is not a skirt
@johnsambo93799 ай бұрын
Is a kilt a skirt?
@sifu96839 ай бұрын
Unless your in the clergy! Lol! Couldn't resist
@LadyMaria9 ай бұрын
A ryasa isn't a dress..
@sifu96839 ай бұрын
@@LadyMaria dress is only a name...and I know, that's why the "LOL", lol!
@LadyMaria9 ай бұрын
@@sifu9683 It's not funny at all. It's actually rather childish.
@sifu96839 ай бұрын
@@LadyMaria it is, and your opinion is justified. Tnk for your reply!
@catherineforster10910 ай бұрын
Totally agreed 😊
@madchronz7710 ай бұрын
thanks Fr
@FloresOrtodoxas10 ай бұрын
This has been weighing on me my parish doesn't require headscarves and doesn't mind pants... I have been convicted to slowly switch over my wardrobe, mostly haven't because of cost. I did sew a few pieces, though!
@OrthodoxEthos10 ай бұрын
Switch over? To pants and no headcoverings? That would be rather a shame and also pushy on their part, no -- especially given the Holy Tradition and example of our Saints?
@buzzard77710 ай бұрын
Slight tangent but Fr. Peter did mention this....Unfortunately, in the US I can probably count on one hand the number of priests that will always wear proper priest attire in public. Especially with social media, I'm seeing even so called "conservative" priests walking around in public with jeans, shorts, bathing suits at the beach, etc. It's a shame. As a rule I will not ask for the blessing of a priest who is in lay clothing. This is after reading that St. Paisios did the same when he saw a priest in the airport with regular clothing.
@daynight490210 ай бұрын
AMEN
@erikalittlefield5 ай бұрын
Could I wear pants as it is required form my healthcare job ?
@leoandolino46689 ай бұрын
Good points Father.
@carolflower967210 ай бұрын
With all due respect.. But didn't men in Jesus's time wear robes , ... not pants ?
@levitatingpotato10910 ай бұрын
It's both, a working man such as a fisherman or carpenter, or farmer would not have been wearing pants (not like modern jeans or anything, think alladin), only the merchant class and above would have been wearing robes regularly.
@johnsambo937910 ай бұрын
A robe is not a dress.
@Cobruh_Commander10 ай бұрын
@@levitatingpotato109Not necessarily Aladdin, more like short tunics.
@levitatingpotato10910 ай бұрын
@@Cobruh_Commander I'm thinking more Persian than Greek, the Persian style was more popularized with the rise of byzantine culture. Just looked it up though, they would pull the tunic around their legs like shorts when they were doing manual labor though (there's a word for It but idk what).
@mik56910 ай бұрын
@user-mi5wd7bg9ethat's what an apron is for. Meat butchers, chefs, housewives, gardeners. When scrubbing laundry on a washing board, even back in the day heavy duty aprons were worn when doing things that can make your clothes dirty.
@emilphoryew943610 ай бұрын
Father, We could have very interesting discussions on this topic together if you would care to engage me in such conversation. Interesting topic you bring up.
@ianmackenzie68610 ай бұрын
There is a proper time and a proper place for most things. In the United States and other Allied countries during World War II when women contributed to the war effort by either working in factories or in fields, safety and practicality needed to be considered. Of course in theory Heers is spot on. But this is the real world, and Tastefully tailored and properly fashioned pants for women I believe are appropriate in the right circumstances. No, women should not wear men's pants or men's suits but women Styles as long as they're modest are fine.
@mariavlahochristos775610 ай бұрын
Amen Pater ! Totally agree
@danielgaley967610 ай бұрын
I am knew to Orthodoxy. How should men be dressed? Guidelines?
@Cobruh_Commander10 ай бұрын
Just cover your arms, legs & torso and you'll be fine.
@OrthodoxEthos10 ай бұрын
You will never go wrong if you are modest, covered and respectful in dress -- both for yourself, spiritually (it will help you in your thoughts if you have simple, modest dress and cease to think much about it) and for others around you. Thus, you would avoid clothing which draws a lot of attention to yourself, shows off your body, your legs, etc.
@LadyMaria10 ай бұрын
@@Cobruh_CommanderAnd nothing tight.
@karenac6702 ай бұрын
Culture says pants are for men and skirts are for women
@Greasy__Bear10 ай бұрын
I never understood why women are so insistent when it comes to not wearing dresses or headcoverings. I grew up in a church similar to the menonites. The men wore suits and ties the women wore dresses and headcoverings. The women were the first to start pushing against the "dress code." I would rather be required to wear a head covering than a tie any day. I still wear a tie now that I'm a catecumen. It's a bit of a hold over from how I was raised, but the Sunday best concept is part of my culture. From what I understand orthodoxy does not reject the good parts from other cultures.
@GCarty8020 күн бұрын
I suspect headcoverings are stigmatized by their association in modern minds with Islam.
@johnjelinek398310 ай бұрын
What about a romper outfit? It's dress-ish
@captainmartin121913 сағат бұрын
There is nothing in the bible that says woman have to wear dresses or long skirts. Pants were first created for horseback riding. People who rode horses needed to protect their legs. In fact, pants were not specifically a male garment. Men and woman wore pants. In some cultures, men wearing pants was consider effeminate. In most nations the ancient style of pants was worn by both men and woman. Pants were not originally considered a male only garment. At some point later on some nations decided that pants were for men and dress and skirts were for woman. That went unchallenged until the 1800s when bicycles became popular, but woman found their dresses and skirts got stuck in the wheels and they wanted to wear pants. There is nothing biblically stopping woman from wearing pants. In fact, most Jewish men in biblical times did not wear pants. They wore a tunic. Both men and woman wore tunics The woman tunic was slightly different, but they wore almost the same thing. The only people who wore something close to pants was the priest who wore line breeches which did not go past the knees and was an undergarment which was covered by a tunic. I find this argument to be nonsensical to be honest.
@jupiterrising88710 ай бұрын
I was always told it was because a woman with her dress up can run a lot faster than a man with his pants down.
@Robert_The_Bruce0510 ай бұрын
What about kilts? Kilts are meant to be worn specifically by men.
@CVS192610 ай бұрын
The men’s kilts and the women’s skirts were different. If you look historically into it you’ll see women’s were longer and more modest.
@Ioannikios17410 ай бұрын
Almost no one wears a kilt in modern society.
@pucktoad13 күн бұрын
I understand that there are morals and standards in religion but I don't get the argument against having free clothes. "It might tempt men?" Isn't that the man's problem? "Would you want to see me in shorts?" I honestly don't care. "It isn't beautiful." I thought it was about modesty. I know modesty and beauty are not mutually exclusive. Times change. I'm not saying modern arrogance is good, but stating women need to go back to the beauty standard of your church is a very vain thought process.
@Honey1xyz10 ай бұрын
Men wearing pants makes it very visible too 😂😂
@OrthodoxEthos10 ай бұрын
What would you propose? Of course, men can also be immodest. Pants can be modest and immodest.
@polkamila10 ай бұрын
I get cold really easily, wearing dresses even with tights is difficult for me as I get freezing, is it okay to wear pants in this case?
@S.Marinka10 ай бұрын
Look into merino wool leggings! It keeps me warm in the cold NY winters under skirts and dresses.
@GNavarro9710 ай бұрын
Wear pants underneath a long dress. It is no longer a problem them.
@polkamila10 ай бұрын
@@S.Marinkathank you ❤
@marina-hermione10 ай бұрын
They have all kinds of leggings/tights these days. As mentioned - wool - or fleece, etc. I usually wear thicker cotton leggings with thigh high wool leg warmers over my leggings which helps a lot as it’s double layered.
@jeuen693310 ай бұрын
I live in cold climate (canada) and wear dresses/skirts all winter, with leggings and socks. A long coat helps.
@Maria-Ortodoxa10 ай бұрын
Besides Deuteronomy 22:5 and Holy Canon 62 of the Sixth Ecumenical Council, you can see in the video at min 25 until 25:40 the demons' reactions to women in pants. This father was killed for Christ and sadly I can't find anything translated from Russian in English. kzbin.info/www/bejne/anevan2OgLmGbrc
@Maria-Ortodoxa10 ай бұрын
The video is from 2007. He was killed in 2010. He talks about electronic ID's, chips, abortions, makeup and so on. What a shame that no one has translated it into English yet!
@erintaylor5856Ай бұрын
100 percent of biblical characters wore skirted garments. Scripture spends zero time defining what pertains to a man and a woman. Fashion is at the whims of culture where God is the same yesterday today and forever. SO the more you talk it the more you realize its what men want to see rather than what God commands.
@rosem837710 ай бұрын
Wearing a dress should not be imposed though. A woman has to feel that she is chosing it for the right reasons. If she does not understand why, she will have a journey to get there.
@WillieUnvlkan7 ай бұрын
Hi Rose Good morning. I hope my comment didn't sound as a form of privacy invasion your comment tells of a wonderful woman with a beautiful heart which led me to comment I don't normally write in the comment section but I think you deserve this complement. If you don’t mind can we be friends? Thanks God bless you….🌺🌺🌺
@deedeepoulinas78998 ай бұрын
Do you prefer mini dress over a nice pair of pants???
@kaelou34083 ай бұрын
I’m tired of seeing Orthodox women not wearing head covering’s, and then some adult’s and children wearing short skirts (!), or even pants!! OCA women wear pants!!! 😢
@tssc10958 күн бұрын
Women can’t wear jeans in church????
@eh334510 ай бұрын
Which Church is Fr. Here’s a priest in? Antiochian?
@eh334510 ай бұрын
Heers, not Here’s, sorry
@Cobruh_Commander10 ай бұрын
@@eh3345Originally Greek, now ROCOR, I believe.
@kateh235410 ай бұрын
I believe women should cover their heads in church. I believe everyone should dress as nice as possible for God when attending church. But if women have to wear to dresses, then men have to wear dresses. I have never seen early paintings of the church that showed men wearing trousers. Men's clothes might have been called "robes", but they were still gowns, dresses, whatever you want to call them. Please explain why men are granted the right to wear pants now and women are not. There are pants that are appropriate and are not cut tight for both men and women. Clothes should never be revealing, but I dont understand how you can say it is okay for mens clothes to change, but not women’s.
@Ioannikios17410 ай бұрын
Wearing pants in western society was scandalous at first decades ago. Dresses were part of a woman's attire and only in recent decades have women started wearing trousers. This is known to the older generation. My father and mother, both in their 60s were raised in the Dominican Republic and it was a big deal when women started wearing pants. The heterodox Christians in that country (and I'm sure all of Latin America) were very scandalized. Also, this is definitely NOT only Fr. Peter's opinion as many in our Church have spoken about this issue.
@melonyrobinson99449 ай бұрын
As an orthodox christian, I've never heard anyone complain about women in pants. Your point about modesty is exactly right. Women wearing pants is perfectly moral and normal
@LadyMaria9 ай бұрын
A ryasa is not a dress! Geesh.
@user-en6zl1cm5r8 ай бұрын
Well said. The issue is CROSS DRESSING. When I wear modest pants made for women I don't look like a cross dresser.
@greaterthanme87610 ай бұрын
Father forgive me, I don't mean to argue with a priest, however, I disagree. My husband and I are both Orthodox and indeed I met him wearing pants and continue wearing pants even through our marriage. I believe he is a good husband, and yet it sounded as though you had condemned women to be unable to find good husbands when wearing pants. Additionally, I have been sexually harassed wearing skirts in my younger years. Men would say things like (forgive the vulgarity of this quote) "women should wear skirts more because it is easy access" skirts/dresses can and do cause men temptation, and wearing skirts can at times cause some women discomfort because of that. Now, I do firmly believe in wearing skirts to church. I am old fashioned in the sense that I prefer my more formal attire to be dresses or skirts, but in every day life pants are more practical, especially on the farm. I am surprised at the way this video represented women. To me this message sounded arrogantly judgmental, condemning, and came across more like a soap box than a message of humility and love. I don't normally do this, but as you are a priest who has committed himself to living and teaching Christ, I believe keeping my honesty and boldness from you does you a disservice in your mission. When you teach, teach with kindness, love and tenderness for Christ and for those who are listening, please do not judge nor condemn, rather, reflect humbly on whether the message and your portrayal of it is an opinion of arrogance and ego or a message from our good and loving GOD, for patience, kindness, humility and grace is much easier to learn from than man's opinion.
@LadyMaria10 ай бұрын
We can wear leggings under the skirts, then the guys who are perverted like that have nothing to talk about.
@renatemocza719510 ай бұрын
When I was a teenager I had to wear dresses. It was just a few years before women started to wear jeans and the same happened to me. I was not only harassed, but also raped by some lads who always hung around the school. Later one of them got arrested. I started to wear pants, I did not want to look like a woman, and never wore dresses anymore.
@greaterthanme87610 ай бұрын
@@renatemocza7195 To be treated in that way is truly horrific, too many of us have been forced to endure the evils of another's temptation. It is a life long burden of intense and lasting fear, and pain that we must carry (through no fault of our own) for the rest of our lives. May Christ have mercy and free us from the grief and trauma.
@renatemocza719510 ай бұрын
@@greaterthanme876 Thank You, God bless!
@Србомбоница869 ай бұрын
Excuses excuses excuses,you are not truly Orthodox
@clmberserker24510 ай бұрын
I dont disagree, but dont Greek men wear kilts as part of their national costume?
@Cobruh_Commander10 ай бұрын
That's only one group to my knowledge, they are an exceptional case.
@clmberserker24510 ай бұрын
@@Cobruh_Commander and south Albanians have it too. And scottish... and when you realize that long ago trousers were considered barbaric and togas or robes were preferred. I think one should speak generally and say there that should be gendered clothing that is modest, no matter what that looks like.
@Cobruh_Commander10 ай бұрын
@@clmberserker245Scotsmen don't normally wear kilts outside of the Highland Regiments, trousers are the norm for western/northern Europe because Togas and tunics suck for keeping the heat in, that's a fact.
@clmberserker24510 ай бұрын
@@Cobruh_Commander im just being pedantic over Father perhaps being also so. i agree with gender dimorphism in clothing, but there are other ways how that may look like besides the generic western (or shall i say "western") dresses vs pants. that's all i wanted to say.
@Србомбоница869 ай бұрын
@clmberserker245 you are just looking for any excuse literally any to wear what you want and not how God wants it
@melonyrobinson99449 ай бұрын
As an orthodox christian, this is stupid. Men should not wear dresses. Duh. However, women wearing pants has been in public consciousness since the 1860s, and has been common since the 1950s. It is not distracting or overly masculine for a woman to wear pants. Are ripped skinny jeans appropriate for church? No, but that doesnt mean a flowy pair of slack is out of place. Pants are not worn by women as an attempt to be manly, they are worn because they are comfortable and convenient. This is a non-issue, and I hope non-orthodox who see this video dont take it as a representation of our faith
@LadyMaria9 ай бұрын
A dress is more comfortable..
@melonyrobinson99449 ай бұрын
@@LadyMaria that's subjective
@Србомбоница869 ай бұрын
@@melonyrobinson9944 you are wrong and don't respect rules of Orthodoxy
@melonyrobinson99449 ай бұрын
@@Србомбоница86 what am I wrong about? And what "rules of orthodoxy"? Is there a Canon on this? Some place in scripture or the church fathers that discusses it? If so, please enlighten me
@user-en6zl1cm5r8 ай бұрын
I know. This is an embarrassment for Orthodoxy. The issue is cross dressing. What exactly constitutes ''cross dressing'' various from culture to culture and era to era. Today, women wearing pants isn't considered cross dressing.
@TyranyFighterPatriot10 ай бұрын
I'm gonna be frank with everyone. A female NEVER looked like a women in pants, nor a male manly in blouses. 🤔
@melonyrobinson99449 ай бұрын
Did Jesus look masculine in his tunic?
@TyranyFighterPatriot9 ай бұрын
Yea I bet he did. Jesus wasn't wearing women's blouses 😅
@melonyrobinson99449 ай бұрын
@@TyranyFighterPatriot I don't have a problem with preventing men from wearing blouses. But the point is that clothing appearing masculine or feminine is, to a point, subjective. Men wearing women's clothing is attention seeking and overly feminine in our current culture/society/time. However, women wearing pants is perfectly normal and not overly masculine. If a man wear women's clothing it is because he wants to look feminine. The same is not true for women wearing what has, in the past, been characterized as "men's clothing", aka pants
@TyranyFighterPatriot9 ай бұрын
False. I had some hope for understanding my point but no more. I will be clearer. Women wearing pants is the the same as men wearing blouses and vice versa. Christendom has ways held this, before the dark embracement of the poison that is Liberalism and Humanism by peoples. It's not even an argument its a fact that will never change.
@BradtavionАй бұрын
Yes i agree men should wear skirts and pant woman should wear dresses
@ishitrealbad303910 ай бұрын
1:34 Father i would argue that, women wearing dresses today would catch more eyes than women being half naked or wearing tight clothing. For two reasons; 1. Obviously it's not the norm anymore and very very rare to see a woman wearing a dress outside of formal occations. 2. We've become so accustomed to women wearing revealing clothing, that women wearing dresses would catch more eyes from men. Because in an absence of sex differences, a woman wearing a dress is very feminime. Ofcourse this also depends on what kind of dress a woman is wearing.
@zaarongaming817410 ай бұрын
If you catch eyes for dressing modestly that's not such a bad thing
@OrthodoxEthos10 ай бұрын
Obedience to the traditional forms and imitation of the saints = narrow path. IF the narrow path is rare... is this a surprise?
@LadyMaria10 ай бұрын
I'm not going to wear pants to church so that's the guy's issue, not mine. He can look away.
@ishitrealbad303910 ай бұрын
@@LadyMaria where did i say it was an issue?
@ishitrealbad303910 ай бұрын
@@zaarongaming8174 i never said it was a bad thing
@helgaioannidis936510 ай бұрын
For thousands of years men and women wore a Tunica, there were no pants. Jesus didn't wear pants. None of the apostles did. So the question shouldn't be if women should wear pants, but if anybody should.
@Србомбоница869 ай бұрын
You are not Orthodox,just leave our videos alone ,your German arrogance doesn't belong here
@melonyrobinson99449 ай бұрын
@@Србомбоница86that doesn't really matter. I'm orthodox, and I agree
@damianhuman10 ай бұрын
what about winter, are the ladies supposed to freeze?
@S.Marinka10 ай бұрын
I only wear skirts and dresses and I live in NY. I did not freeze yet. Still alive and well!
@Verena172010 ай бұрын
That's when they can wear things like leggings, which are really just an undergarment, there's also petticoats, which are underskirts, and thicker taller socks. In the world of women's apparel they have plenty of things to deal with winter.
@bsdnfraje10 ай бұрын
Ask a Scotsman about winter. They do fine, and a kilt comes only to the top of the knee.
@baelischthebard68210 ай бұрын
a well regimented Kilt is supposed to go the center of the Kneecap, not above@@bsdnfraje
@bsdnfraje10 ай бұрын
@@baelischthebard682 I'm not going to waste time arguing over an inch and a half, but you have fun. At the center of the knee cap, the pleats will contact the back of the calves on a quick march and lead to unnecessary chafing.
@Jhadar3 ай бұрын
2:35 perfect response 😂
@DG-ee9hi10 ай бұрын
Any breakdown why and when stopped wearing more modest tunics? Perhaps girding for work/war but hasn’t the more immodest pants for men been directed by fashion?
@OrthodoxEthos10 ай бұрын
A process -- of westernization/europeanization/americanization of Orthodox peoples from traditional lands - over hundreds of years, but especially since the 1950s (at least in the villages in Greece).
@Cobruh_Commander10 ай бұрын
Trousers are the norm in western/northern Europe where it gets VERY cold during the winter. The robes help with airflow in the heat but not so much in the cold when you need to keep in heat.
@marelkrs8 ай бұрын
@@OrthodoxEthos Father, is it ok if we wear leggings or looser pant like garments underneath dresses? Please it would be great if you answered, i know you are probably very busy
@JasonGeorgiouGaming10 ай бұрын
There are pants that are modest, combined with certain blouses... the point is not the piece of item (bear in mind, men did NOT wear pants as well) in the ancient church, and were forbidden to do so. Modesty is beyond dress or pant. And there are certainly female pants and blouses. As long as the clothes are not made to emphasize bodily parts in a certain manner then we should get over it. Spirituality is not micromanagement.
@majorian489710 ай бұрын
Pants are barbarian to begin with lol
@Cobruh_Commander10 ай бұрын
Yet you speak a "barbarian" tongue, interesting. Do you wear T-shirts also? Those aren't Greek in origin. Pants are superior to tunics in cold weather.
@dimitrap561510 ай бұрын
I completely agree with this 😂 pants are the devils invention
@stylist62Ай бұрын
Father I agree with you, dresses are also made for a woman’s body, comfortable loose where you need it. I wore pants about 4 times in the last year because It’s cold I do wear leggings pants under my dresses also It’s challenging finding cute comfy shoes when it’s cold father unless it’s boots
@smallparticlelinda10 ай бұрын
I bike to church🚲 Skirts and dresses just aren't practical for biking. It's dangerous for long flowy fabric to be caught in the gears, and you can't pedal efficiently in a long tight skirt. I don't care what you call me, nothing can stop me from biking all the way there in trousers and sneakers/rainboots just to spend some time in the house of God.
@Maria-Ortodoxa10 ай бұрын
Bike away, no one can force you to do God's will. But you will also not be able to say you did not know.
@tylerward284610 ай бұрын
@@Maria-Ortodoxa Pants are not a big deal I dont understand. its pants, women's pants are very distinct from men's pants. There's no way God has a will for pants
@Maria-Ortodoxa10 ай бұрын
@@tylerward2846 Besides Deuteronomy 22:5 and Holy Canon 62 of the Sixth Ecumenical Council, you can see in the video at min 25 until 25:40 the demons' reactions to women in pants. This father was killed for Christ and sadly I can't find anything translated from Russian in English. kzbin.info/www/bejne/anevan2OgLmGbrc
@smallparticlelinda10 ай бұрын
@@Maria-Ortodoxa The Scottish kilt is a national garment worn by males. In the same way there are skirts for men, there are pants for women. In fact, the traditional clothing for women of other cultures also include pants. As an example, everyone in Mongolia, males and females alike, started riding horses at a young age. All of them wore pants on a horse, underneath a cloak-like outer garment for warmth and insulation.
@Cobruh_Commander10 ай бұрын
You could bring a backpack with a skirt stuffed inside. Just my two cents, unless you already tried that.
@saulrobertson37893 ай бұрын
Fr Peter is such a legend
@soare518210 ай бұрын
Father in the beginning of christianity everyone were dresses. The clothes one's choose to wear won't save or damn someone. Saint Xenia was dressed with dead's military husband's clothes, Saint Mary of Egypt was naked in the desert. Pants are late fashion item. I totally agree men should be men and women should be women but clothes are not dogma.
@Србомбоница869 ай бұрын
Tight pants were never worn like now ,it's immoral,we should cover like our Holy MOTHER ,we mimick Her
@LadyMaria9 ай бұрын
A robe is not a dress!!
@LadyMaria9 ай бұрын
@@melonyrobinson9944That's Fr. Peter. At Divine Services no one should wear tight clothing. Modesty matters.
@soare51829 ай бұрын
@melonyrobinson9944 You should mind your own business and stop imposing your view to other women. No one made you fashion police in the church.
@soare51829 ай бұрын
@@LadyMaria i suspect you're the type of woman who is scanning other women in the church rather than paying attention to the liturgy.
@zenbear414910 ай бұрын
Appreciate the spirit, but there are plenty of Orthodox cultures where everyone wore some kind of dress-like tunic. Sexual differences were expressed in different ways. Same thing with pants. Women in this culture wear pants. Period. I wish it were different, but that's not the hill to die on. How about we just emphasize women not wearing disgusting skin tight leotards/workout hot pants/bodysuits everywhere all the time now?
@Србомбоница869 ай бұрын
Nope ,many women wear dresses much more😊
@chrisanthipsoinou281810 ай бұрын
Didn’t a female Saint who was in the military wear pants.
@ducky101610 ай бұрын
St Xenia wore her husbands uniform
@Quequeresvos1210 ай бұрын
You can't make a rule out of an exception.
@ducky101610 ай бұрын
@nikosantikythera2422 Im aware.
@CVS192610 ай бұрын
And Saint Xenia wore his top coat not the pants part
@OrthodoxEthos10 ай бұрын
Traditionally, women were not in the military. When they began to serve, they did -- but that is it that long ago that this became the norm? In any case, it is an exception and not the rule. It is for a very small percentage of women. It is most likely not for you - unless you are in the military, right? And if you were/are in the military, you are free to dress modestly at home, at church, outside of military service, no?
@sharonwalters61359 ай бұрын
Well, as a woman in my 80s and converted with my whole family to orthodoxy in my 70s, I am properly shamed. 😢😢😮And let me tell you it doesn’t feel at all good and it doesn’t feel like love. so I’m supposed to emulate the holy Theotokos, and I’ve only begun to know her but I’m just pretty sure she would never shame me for having short hair and wearing pants for she is holy… I believe now would be a good time for a lesson based on the scripture men, love your wives as Christ loved the church, and gave Himself up for her.
@CreationSGame019 ай бұрын
I think saying pants sexualizes the women ruins your argument. Dresses can do the same thing. Leave that out of your argument next time.
@Vikingshop10 ай бұрын
YES ... ONLY WOMEN WERE DRESSES❗ BUT THE MEN SHOULD NEVER WERE DRESSES OR CLOTHING THAT LOOKS LIKE A DRESS❗ CASSOCK LOOKS LIKE A DRESS and is therefore NOT biblical❗ WOMEN were dresses and MEN were pants❗
@LadyMaria9 ай бұрын
Robes were worn in Holy Scripture. A ryasa is a robe..
@Finny_finn_finnАй бұрын
It's funny...I just somehow "know" instinctively that I wear skirts/dresses...period...no matter what the whether. It isn't even a thought. This, however, has left me a single woman...men don't seem to be attracted to modest women. I have had countless people tell me if I dressed differently, wore my hair down, and wore makeup... I'd attract a man... My response has always been...that's not the type of man I want to attract...I'd rather be single.
@youcantbeatk7006Ай бұрын
Come on now. Nobody believes this. There's several times more single men in Orthodox churches than women. Dating apps always have several times more men. Almost half of all men are single. You're not being honest. I'm sure you've either rejected men directly, or you've thrown them dirty looks to discourage them. Then you come here pretending nobody wants you. Do better.
@TranslatedAssumption10 ай бұрын
Recently I was at a Serbian Parish and I was a bit scandalized by how certain women were dressed, for example one very attractive woman wore a tight, form-fitting dress that was ankle length however was cut up the sides well above the knee. She did not need any help drawing more attention to herself. She was attractive enough to where she could have dressed incredibly modest and still would have gotten all the attention she wanted if that's what she wanted.
@S.Marinka10 ай бұрын
She may be the next St Mary of Egypt or St Photini. It is not good to be judgmental of anyone and be scandalized easily. We do not know how God is working in their lives. It is better to focus on our sins and weaknesses.
@TranslatedAssumption10 ай бұрын
My point has to do with the fact that some people might be missing the mark in how they dress, thinking that it is modest by the letter of the law but certainly not in the spirit of the law as it were. That is how my comment relates to the content of this video. I'm very glad for anyone who is attending Divine liturgy but I also would prefer that women not dress like they're going to a night club afterwards. Children do not need to see that stuff either. I agree that we cannot change how many people may choose to dress.
@ali_haidar_31310 ай бұрын
@@TranslatedAssumption These problems are solved in islam , women wear modest clothes (hijab) and lower their gaze as will as men.
@Србомбоница869 ай бұрын
@@TranslatedAssumptionit's awful truly how people dress
@Србомбоница869 ай бұрын
@@S.Marinkawe have to focus on others too,someone should always guide us help us when we make a mistake
@monte131610 ай бұрын
Its normal for priest to wear a cassock to costco or when out eating? kinda defeats the whole purpose of not drawing attention to oneself. would like to know why this is not the case
@levitatingpotato10910 ай бұрын
Priests are supposed to let others know they are a priest, its like a soldier wearing their rank on their uniform so that you know how to adress them. How are you going to know to ask for their blessing if you don't even know they are a Priest, they don't just lose their ecclesiastical rank simply because they exit the church, unlike the western tradition, you don't have 2 separate lives when you are Orthodox.
@annk.354510 ай бұрын
Yes, it’s normal.
@rhondab979210 ай бұрын
My priest has had strangers on the beach approach him for help because they could see by his cassock that he was a priest.
@OrthodoxEthos10 ай бұрын
Always. It is who they are. They are always priests. They are never "off-duty." The cassock is a witness. Drawing attention to it is not at all the same as drawing attention to yourself/your body for selfish reasons. Isn't there a difference between the attention a policeman in uniform draws to himself and a prostitute draws to herself, for example?