Why You Shouldn't Reveal Your Drawback

[@damsonrhea]

Did anyone else image his opponent reading his drawback, going "Sounds absolutely impossible, but I'm not a coward", and then revealing it?

[@vnXun]

Plot twist: The opponent was Simp himself from the future and there is a glitch in the matrix that messes up the time line.

[@Kalulosu]

@@vnXun Simp Wars: accros the Simpoverse

[@какой-точеловек-ф7н]

​@@vnXunAnd in one of his next video will be that exact game but from another side

[@liquidcashews]

i love imaging

[@adi_g]

That opponent's bravery must be commended. A minite of silence for the fallen warrior.

[@bluesbest1]

o7

[@weston06.]

I hate to be that guy but “minute”

[@SuicV]

​@@weston06. No you don't It's fine, I'd do the same

[@mitigamespro8757]

@@SuicV I'd also do the same

[@headpenguin8758]

007

[@erickaguirre4888]

The drawback on his opponent was stupidly difficult

[@feliksporeba5851]

It was pretty difficult, but revealing it made it just impossible

[@drachefly]

really should have gotten the knights active…

[@erickaguirre4888]

@@drachefly I don't think so, the knights were protecting the pawns. If the knights were not in their starting position, the queen could go crazy and run into their pawns.

[@drachefly]

​@@erickaguirre4888 Yeah, this is just really hard if your opponent knows you have it.

[@remil3777]

I don't think this drawback is that problematic *as long as you don't reveal it* because opponent won't know they can go crazy like Simp did

[@bazzatron9482]

I like this one. White saw the overwhelming drawback and was like "black will get a kick out of seeing this BS", and then played through like a champion. o7

[@kriena4190]

Man's pawns were just shitty barricades from that drawback

[@vozh-kc]

ah yes, the REAL "100-rated chess but"

[@gabrielrochadasilva3183]

Be sure to really take in this moment, for it will never happen again.

[@theominouspigeon]

"better be safe then pregnant" 💀

[@Game_player_1.0]

confusing the e and a is in that case a huge blunder

[@drdca8263]

@@Game_player_1.0sefa?

[@someaccount5200]

Better be safe than m pregged

[@dikephobia]

@@drdca8263 no it’s dumb then/than grammar police shenanigans

[@seductive_fishstick8961]

It caught me so offguard 💀

[@tomasocarbone]

Simp never fails to maintain 100% win rate

[@Cripplified]

50% of the time, he wins 100% of the time.

[@Modie]

"Barely an inconvinience" I know I am not the only one hearing that sentence in a different voice.

[@Worldsportstalk24]

Wow wow wow wow wow. Wow.

[@rogonz89]

It was missing a key part at the beginning, but yeah.

[@maegor-targaryen]

@@rogonz89 Missing key parts at the beginning is *_tight!_*

[@Majima_Nowhere]

​@@rogonz89 I'm gonna need you to get _all the way off my back_ about it

[@GTron13]

Instead of just adding 100 points, you should double it and give it to the next person.

[@NeunEinser]

He did 0 last time. Double of 0 would still be 0.

[@theneoreformationist]

@@NeunEinser No, it would be 00

[@The_Dr_Fate]

​@@theneoreformationistwhich is equal to 0

[@Idran]

​@@The_Dr_Fatetell that to a roulette wheel

[@Tehom1]

As bad as his opponent's drawback was, it gets way worse when it's revealed.

[@Nando_Lorris_04]

The elo is equivalent to the win rate at drawback chess, so you’re going into your next game with a 200% win rate again

[@aidanfiadh]

There should probably be a "propose revealing drawbacks" button, so you both have to agree to reveal

[@williamnathanael412]

I will always reject, but sure, doesn't hurt.

[@1roman1738]

@@williamnathanael412just because you are a coward doesn’t mean others are

[@creativenametxt2960]

I personally think it makes sense to read the drawback when the opponent reveals it. The fact that opponent thinks that you are aware of their drawback definitelly changes how they play, so even if you don't actually read it the game will be easier for you, might as well make it a fair fighting ground.

[@dorchevsky2556]

I feel like you could’ve sacked your queen out of respect but it is what it is

[@Those_Weirdos]

I can see the opponent revealing the drawback just to show "this is why you're going to see me play like a 100 ELO..."

[@DavidLee-frost]

The opponent challenge shouldn't be medium difficulty. His entire line of pawns is useless and his king cannot defend himself

[@The_Dr_Fate]

"far sighted pieces cant capture pieces that are adiacent to them" FAR SIGHTED PIECES queen, bishop and rook learn to read properly

[@merlin9845]

​@@The_Dr_Fate I think you're the one who needs to read. "Far Sighted: " ":" There are two dots before, anything before is the name of the drawback and anything after is the actual effect. And the effect is "Your pieces can't capture adjacent ones". That's why signals are so important, learn how to read, you're needing it.

[@The_Dr_Fate]

@@merlin9845 dude on the vid the ":" sign is almost impossible to notice, did u think about that

[@salter1630]

​@@The_Dr_Fate maybe don't be so aggressive and confident if you think your information is incomplete, plus.. pay attention to the video

[@The_Dr_Fate]

@@salter1630 maybe learn that ppl make mistakes and u dont always notice everything even when u pay attention. I thought my information _was_ complete when i was typing the first comment

[@DvirPick]

You did have one video of drawback chess where you put something to cover part of the screen so that even if the opponent reveals their drawback, you would still not see it. If you're not a coward, bring that back

[@jeremyready8030]

This drawback should definitely be just about in the 'hard' section

[@char1194]

First video where simp actually has the ADVANTANGE?

[@vanochristian7639]

Since the opponent’s position crumbled due to the challenge like what often happens to Simp, you could say that things went very right very quickly (for simp).

[@goldengolem4670]

That poor opponent

[@MrJSyer]

The drawback of the ooponent made it impossible for him to win. Simp's drawback was realley "barely an inconvenient".

[@rastraman1]

If you take his pawn at second turn, it could be even easier.

[@rookjameson]

I really like the idea of doing series that get progressively more difficult!

[@ShadowTheAge]

Pieces = Pieces + Pawns Pawns = 0

[@mjbalbo]

Props to your opponent for revealing their drawback. Chad move even if they lost.

[@shardmaw]

In rememberence of one poor fellow who, after I revealed my drawback (expedition: on move 14 you must move to e8) he revealed his was "hopscotch: You must alternate moving to light squares and dark squares" so I (I was losing) walked my king up to his and he resigned because he couldn't checkmate me.

[@bogardeth]

So by "you must promote to rooks" it meant "you can only promote to rooks."

[@MrJSyer]

This makes a LOT of difference. But, in this case, it would only add a little delay to the inavoidable result.

[@stupiditiusmaximus]

1:45 Free pawn, I thunk

[@rraimundobruno]

In respect for your opponent you should do a regular chess video with this drawback to prove that you could win even without them revealing their drawback

[@Person01234]

His drawback was brutal, even without being revealed. Literally every one of his pawns becomes a useless standing man and it becomes impossible to seriously defend pieces in a huge number of situations.

[@mojojoko]

The true not-a-coward move would be to add "make your opponent's challenge irrelevant" to your own challenge, so in this case you are not allowed to move a piece adjacent to an opponent's piece in a position they would normally be able to attack you.

[@sans4071]

3:12 Be2. Nothing can take and bishop can’t move, meaning it’s free. This disabled the bishop, and makes Nd3 possible, forking the king and queen. From there mate is stupid easy. You could also take the bishop if your opponent seemed mindless of the upcoming royal fork.

[@moallayoussef5462]

most chaotic chess simp video ever. had a blast watching this

[@titoucarotte5238]

Blasted on my screen while edging to this

[@LukaSpiering]

You disappeared out of my algorithm for so long, welcome back

[@GerhardTreibheit]

The music made me eat my vegetables. I am healthy and happy now

[@itisALWAYSR.A.]

if at 1:39, 2: ...dxe4, i wonder if white would have spotted a forthcoming 3: ...Qxd3 4: ...Qe3 5:...Qe2/1 pattern and been able to do anything practical about it.

[@Flechashe]

Simp ran out of ideas so he started making incremental series, what a neat trick Great work as always

[@person8064]

I'm pretty sure the lowest rating you can give to drawback chess is 400. Even if you say your rating is 100 or 200, if you check your account details it'll be 400. If you want to get a lower rating, you first have to lose some games.

[@octocreeper8182]

At the start you could take his pawn and then if he takes back you can just checkmate him with your queen

[@stupiditiusmaximus]

2:12 FREE PAWN MAYBE

[@lonelyPorterCH]

Some more series, nice

[@swchwrm020]

Move 2: Take pawn, next move queen takes on d2, can't capture with anything, take king?

[@CatholicElectrician]

Seems like at the start, you could’ve just captured the pawn and then pushed queen to D2 for checkmate. He can’t capture

[@magnetsphere2872]

1:30 actually if you took that pawn the open file would allow M2 because of the drawbacks

[@naechosa]

should also make it so you have your previous drawbacks carried over, otherwise its just going to be you stomping for 20 games until you get a bad drawback

[@kitthekat6844]

Weekly drawback sounds fun!

[@PLSKICKME_]

2:34 He cant check mate you since your king is adjecent.

[@anonym5160]

At wich website can you play this?

[@susejtsirhc4202]

I wish movement restrictions didn't count against checkmating.

[@iagocastelobranco3851]

When you play your first game regardless of how much elo you reckon under 800, will always start with 800 elo, if you add a lot the cap is 2000, so no point in adding 100 elo until 800. So you should do 900 next time.

[@HenrikMyrhaug]

Love how you forgot the pawns can't capture!

[@lolok6439]

at 2:40, your king is safe after qxf7, as the queen cannot capture the king since it's farsighted

[@lolok6439]

man i need to keep watching the videos before commenting

[@bossfan25]

o7 That draw back was insane.

[@zackpoopable]

More drawback chess! This site is hilarious

[@NoomStuff]

Video 156 of asking simp to play fps chess

[@sashagornostay2188]

Am I the only one to see "HE SHOWERED?"

[@Infarlock]

Good challenge actually, for once

[@natthekiwi7074]

The queen can’t go diag-onoly

[@FluffyBooster]

So the thing is with drawback chess is you aren’t matched against opponents with similar elos, instead the higher elo player gets harder drawbacks relative to the difference. So by putting a low elo you aren’t playing 100 elo players, you’re just playing a 900 who has the most bullshit drawback imaginable cause the site assumes there’s a much bigger skill gap than reality lmao.

[@AM-yk5yd]

This sounds absolutely horrible challenge to begin with. To reveal it is even more horrible

[@rjb8145]

P A I D A C T O R

[@IllIl]

Feels like smurfing though if you put your ELO at 100 :/ Great work as always.

[@Eagle-Fly]

1:45 no reason to capture his pawn??? What about the mate in 2 threat? The mate probs wont happen cause of our drawback but it still wouldve been a big advantage

[@foolishball9155]

1:26 There are worse things you can reveal to your opponents but ok

[@wolfVFV]

Well opponents drawback is so much worse because of elo difference Even if he is just 1000 thats a 900 point difference

[@Rafael-w4j]

Nerf Far-Sighted to not affect Pawns.

[@davisdawson5047]

If you took the pawn right away at the beginning, you could have do a cheeky Qd2 checkmate. Their man woman bishop all can't kill your woman in melee range.

[@icegun784]

And yet he still brags that he's better than his viewers

[@delayedhoe9714]

The d2 square? The d2 square that's defended by a knight? THAT d2 square?

[@titoucarotte5238]

Plus it is not checkmate due to his drawback anyways

[@RoundShades]

This site really needs a little more coding put into drawback reveal. Maybe an "offer mutual reveal", and reveal instead offering it to opponent and the opponent can decline reading it.

[@DFuxa]

Really difficult to read the opponents drawback - was that intentional or was it just the site?

[@tanjay8507]

I think you and your opponent read his drawback wrong, pawns are not pieces so he could have taken A LOT of your pieces during the game. I think he didnt know that and it made the game impossible for him but his drawback should not be this hard (it is hard for sure but not impossible if you know you can take with pawns)

[@Moleoflands]

Drawback chess site count pawns as pieces

[@undotheflower]

aint no way bro actually read my comment (this feeling is so good)

[@mitko1955]

when did he play drawback with 0 ELO points? last week ? I watch every single video and I don't think that happened. He always puts in 999999 what's the video called?

[@typical9627]

“My 200 IQ Gameplay”

[@interactii]

Not really a fan of the clickbaity video graphic.

[@Knighterforker]

Day 32 Chess,but the game must end in a Bishop and knight checkmate

[@Shizuna560]

47 sec no view, GG

[@sapiensoutpost]

*ANTI SPOILER BARRIER*

[@choco1101]

ugh... shouldn't you just take the e pawn and aim for Qxd2 instant win? Nf3 delays it, but you just take it.

[@nathanrudman7771]

Less than 1 minute ago gang I guess

[@Psykolord1989]

Here first for once! "Sounds barely an inconvenience" Ah, so your doom is written in the stars, got it. EDIT: Huh, that usually works.

[@domotheus]

first

[@rraimundobruno]

In respect for your opponent you should do a regular chess video with this drawback to prove that you could win even without them revealing their drawback