First guy threw so hard. Using the queen to keep taking anything would have been unstoppable
@Balsiefen3 ай бұрын
Qf3 would've forced simp to bongcloud or lose which would've been entertaining.
@idonnow23 ай бұрын
ikr bro focused too much on his own challenge, tried exploiting simp's challenge with minor pieces only, and then traded the queen away. That L was absolutely deserved
@AndrewAP463 ай бұрын
@@idonnow2he didn't focus on his challenge at all. Before move 12 there were a bunch of chances he can get rook to rank 7, yet he didn't even move his rook once.
@idonnow23 ай бұрын
@@AndrewAP46 He moved the rook pawn in one of the early moves, and i see no reason for that other than his challenge
Game 3, Your drawback: Can't move king. Their drawback: Must move king.
@WhoStoleKirya733 ай бұрын
Only a sith deals in absolutes
@xwxo3 ай бұрын
3:58 that move felt like rubbing salt on a wound. not only was he hoping to move his rook on move 14, preparing for the 15th move but he didn't see the bishop, and you taking away his only chance to survive AND ALSO mocking him by doing his challenge for him, that felt brutal
@deltasprey87843 ай бұрын
10:40 Their drawback aside, blocking the check blunders a rook...
@3ternalHours3 ай бұрын
Suspicious Simp didn't see that
@Patashu3 ай бұрын
These are a lot more dynamic now that the drawback revealing is symmetrical. Makes me wonder if the button instead of being 'reveal drawback' should be 'offer simultaneous reveal drawback' which can be accepted or rejected.
@lmabacus4043 ай бұрын
I think they could have both buttons, keeping the first for people like Simp who want an extra challenge.
@CommentPersonAndStuff3 ай бұрын
The second game was unlosable, all Simp had to do was keep his king on e7, and even if his opponent took all of his pieces and he was forced to make a king move he could just shuffle between e7 and f6.
@Stirdix3 ай бұрын
Not quite foolproof because of Simp's drawback: if one of those moves is a capture and the opponent moves a piece to the other square, then king has to move somewhere else
@TheAkunoKage3 ай бұрын
Neither can ever be a capture though, because the opponent can't move peices to those squares @Stirdix
@CommentPersonAndStuff3 ай бұрын
@@Stirdix The opponent would never be able to force a capture because to force a capture he would have to put a piece on one of the safe squares which he cannot, as his drawback states.
@craigspaulding97113 ай бұрын
It seems that in the higher elos, players are much more likely to reveal their drawback in return, which makes it a lot more entertaining.
@MattMorency3 ай бұрын
Honorable combat
@CarlosSamuel-ms9ee3 ай бұрын
As long as they reveal their drawback at the start, I will always reciprocate. Some people seem to use it when they are already losing in order to give themselves another chance if you return the favour though.
@person80643 ай бұрын
@@CarlosSamuel-ms9ee Some people also reveal once their drawback has been fulfilled, such as after trading off all their knights when they can only capture with knights.
@Rackox3 ай бұрын
Some players reveal their drawback when it forces them to do something stupid and lose the game. I guess what they are trying to say is: "I am not an idiot, I know my next move will lose me the game but I can't do otherwise"
@CarlosSamuel-ms9ee3 ай бұрын
@@person8064 Yeah that's probably an attempt to trick you into revealing yours, there doesn't seem to be much reason to do it otherwise.
@andnekon3 ай бұрын
The ending to the first game is brutal
@anime_enjoyer55073 ай бұрын
that second game is so good!! i enjoy it alot~ everything is on equal term. both of you know the drawback and taking advantage of it, and your opponent seems to be capable chess player too so the back and forth is just a feast
@whocares22773 ай бұрын
Once e7, e5 and f6 were safe squares, it was almost impossible to lose this game. You can just keep the king on safe squares and you'll never lose. The opponent would have to take or block all other pieces (and pawns) and then block these squares with enough of their own pieces to use simp's drawback. That is extremely difficult.
@giacomomeluzzi2803 ай бұрын
It was really not, Simp could have just kept his king on a safe square and it would have been 100& impossible to lose
@whocares22773 ай бұрын
@@giacomomeluzzi280 You can't pass your turn, in principle the opponent can block these squares and use Simp's drawback that they can't capture twice in a row with the king.
@giacomomeluzzi2803 ай бұрын
@@whocares2277 yeah good luck with that, to be able to do it you probably have to capture most/all all the enemy pieces which gives your opponent way too many safe squares. Maybe not 100% unloseable, but 99.9 lol
@rohan18643 ай бұрын
as the other people said, they were definitely not on equal terms
@JackBond12343 ай бұрын
In the second game, once the opponent captured on two adjacent squares, you automatically can't lose. Just move the king between the two safe spaces, and the opponent's only hope is a draw by repetition.
@dawidwojacki50493 ай бұрын
Simp casually completing two challenges in one game
@dontpickonme3 ай бұрын
No comment on the flawless calling of enemy's drawback in game 3?
@NWRIBronco63 ай бұрын
What do you mean?
@himothaniel3 ай бұрын
Simp observed the king moving out of check one time and immediately suspects the drawback. The drawback was "when in check, move your king".
@harry_mckenzie3 ай бұрын
I mean...he edits the video after the game is done. It's more like a hint to the viewers
@NWRIBronco63 ай бұрын
@himothaniel Well he said it probably has something to do with the drawback, not that "I think the drawback is specifically he must move his king out of check." He didn't predict anything, nevermind "flawlessly call" it, just noted a suspicious behavior. At best we can say Simp spotted a clue for what the drawback might be, and it happened to be very directly related to what he saw. Plus, as another user noted, he records after so really it's a moot point because he didn't have to predict anything...
@leogasparddagand-schmidt24403 ай бұрын
@@NWRIBronco6And, as another user noted, blocking the check blunders a rook for bishop trade
@RickyWallace3 ай бұрын
Ha! Brutal ending to the first game! 😂
@NumenEloha3 ай бұрын
6:40 So, your king is inmortal, so you can't lose that game. Awesome
@a2070-y8j3 ай бұрын
funny that the last match was "you can't move your king" against "you have to move your king when checked
@fissionphoenix49952 күн бұрын
flexing on your opponent by not only winning but also completing a mirrored version of their drawback was a mastery of showmanship. congrats on that one.
@seisner66553 ай бұрын
Damn, that was an array of really good and balanced game with no bullshit drawbacks. What do you know.
@a.lollipop3 ай бұрын
second game was impossible to win for the opponent, you can keep moving the king between 2 safe squares forever
@lucykitsune46193 ай бұрын
5:50 wait a second! This gamemode requires you to catch your opponent's king. Your king is on a square your opponent can't capture on. You literally can't lose this
@JustSchalke043 ай бұрын
well, he could loose if his opponent takes every piece and pawn or just everything that can still move, to force him to move his king. But yeah its kinda troll knowing that drawback and just having a nearly unkillable king XD
@robmilnejazz3 ай бұрын
@@JustSchalke04 if the king has 2 safe squares next to each other he can just move back and forth between them and the best the opponent can ever get is draw by repetition
@aralornwolf31403 ай бұрын
@@JustZereges, Opponent can't place pieces and pawns on those squares, which is why they are safe places for the king to meditate on.
@JustSchalke043 ай бұрын
@@robmilnejazz i know ^^ in this game that even was the case early on. But in generall you can theoretically play around that draw back and even get a win. Just wanted to mention it might be highly impossible but its not immediatly failed if your opponents king reaches one safe spot ^^
@JustSchalke043 ай бұрын
@@robmilnejazz i know ^^ in this game that even was the case early on. But in generall you can theoretically play around that draw back and even get a win. Just wanted to mention it might be highly impossible but its not immediatly failed if your opponents king reaches one safe spot ^^
@joesmutz92873 ай бұрын
I'm not sure that second game was winnable by the opponent. Keeping your king on a safe square permanently would mean you can't lose
@iCarus_A3 ай бұрын
You'd have to have two adjacent safe squares but otherwise yea
@C-Farsene_53 ай бұрын
Real, if anything, kudos to that guy playing better against Simp with a buff than many others who played against Simp with a nerf
@elekitu27183 ай бұрын
Yeah it's unwinnable unless the opponent managed to get to the endgame and force simp to move their king, or get into a degenerate position where simp is forced to fail their own challenge by lack of legal moves
@leogasparddagand-schmidt24403 ай бұрын
@@elekitu2718With two connected safe squares the best the opponent can do is draw by repetition, as he cannot place any pieces on the safe squares and therefore cannot force the king to leave them
@fatsquirrel753 ай бұрын
@iCarus_A why 2? I thought you had to actually capture the king. If the king is on a safe square that can't happen.
@CSDragon3 ай бұрын
wow he actually called the 3rd opponent's drawback.
@Smokecall3 ай бұрын
13:00. That e file rook pin was a hilarious intermediary blunder
@Capiosus3 ай бұрын
2nd guy blundered so hard by trading queens and giving simp's king full immunity
@chaostails73 ай бұрын
lolol the disrespect in the way you ended that first game was glorious
@sukositb3 ай бұрын
Challenges this time is pretty fun.
@EnverHalilHoxha19173 ай бұрын
Cuz he won at least one game without getting his king captured by the enemy king 9th move of the game.
@AdamSmith-jb2lf3 ай бұрын
Enjoyed the battle between a king that couldn’t move, and a king that Had to move when attacked
@RoundShades3 ай бұрын
10:47 me: "oh, he has the tower defense drawback, id literally be willing to act on that hunch." I might have seen too much drawback chess. ... And i was wrong. Damn lol
@maxastro3 ай бұрын
I had the same thought process!
@dylankrejci99653 ай бұрын
5:48 if the king stays still he’s completely invincible now lol
@TheCountZopolai3 ай бұрын
3:58 video released around 2 hours ago, and I've spent most of that time staring in shock at the sheer chutzpah of that assertion of dominance
@regretnowdoitlater29363 ай бұрын
I like that. "300% win rate!" 🤣
@YourPalQWERTY3 ай бұрын
“Good evening” and video comes out in the morning lol!
@danielbob26283 ай бұрын
If this guy turns out to be Hikaru then he might finally be cooler than the Hikaru from Exo-Force
@mubashirulmoula17983 ай бұрын
12:59 - What an irony that the battery can't charge anything.
@aceospades65703 ай бұрын
I did that one time when I had no pieces left in Drawback Chess. He ran away until I had him cornered and then took me 😂
@himothaniel3 ай бұрын
Guy who couldnt block checks should have prioritized castling.
@n.s.36093 ай бұрын
I read the title and I immediately knew you would use the OST from Scara's boss fight :D
@determineddaaf32 ай бұрын
"Haunted" is so much worse as a challenge if your opponent knows about it. Knowing you have safe squares that your opponent can't move to is pretty much impossible to deal with. That second opponent was definitely not a coward.
@joshuamoyer33273 ай бұрын
I love how G1 Simp revealed his drawback and the opponent just played like he didn't see it
@root_squash3 ай бұрын
The rook to 7th rank rubbing it in had me in tears.
@leonhard63273 ай бұрын
0:42 what is that guy doing? Qg4 attacking d7 and the game is basically over, because all you can do is block or move the king which all does not help
@huvarda3 ай бұрын
Second game felt impossible once revealed
@the_president7473 ай бұрын
I can’t believe the juicy part of game two was skipped!!! 😢
@speedoo423 ай бұрын
It is funny how Simp never disconnect or loose power during drawback chess, unlike during regular loosing challenge
@amazingfireboy18483 ай бұрын
Huh, he predicted the third guy's drawback ridiculously well...
@nathanielscreativecollecti63923 ай бұрын
4:02 was pretty sick.
@Djenzh3 ай бұрын
4:03 that flex was hard
@MrJSyer3 ай бұрын
The 100 rated games could be against a viewer knowing Simp`s challenge
@RealMrHater3 ай бұрын
8:23 surprised you didnt just move your king forward at this point given that space just got made untouchable
@ujasshrestha44183 ай бұрын
WAIT THIS ISN:’T EVENING, ITS LITERALLY 8 IN THE MORNING!!!
@timp74123 ай бұрын
Great work. And glad to see the math is correct, 300% win rate.
@Akshit-v4g3 ай бұрын
1:53 he could have played Qxe4 Be2 Kxf7 or Qxe4 Qe2 Qxe2 Kxe2 Kxf7
@user-m8k9d3 ай бұрын
second game: wait, the game requires you to capture the king. What if black shuffles his king between f6 and e7? Isn't he invincible?
@danh9453 ай бұрын
Those were three really great games!
@brainha57473 ай бұрын
In the 3rd game, the reason they moved the king wasnt for their drawback, your opponent did it because blocking the check with the pawn blunders a full rook
@deadlypandaghost3 ай бұрын
Game 2 you made an immortal king once he captured the queen.
@fiendfi71193 ай бұрын
I knew their drawback was skittish lol
@littlestjoel3 ай бұрын
so after your king took your opponent's queen in the second game, it was physically impossible to lose?
@inciaradible71443 ай бұрын
Haunted is kinda crazy because if your opponent has two adjacent squares for the King to move to (on which a capture happened), they can never lose.
@DrewIverson2 ай бұрын
I literally lol’d when you put your rook on the 2nd rank in game 1 😂
@number1-willstetsonsimp3 ай бұрын
5:44 shouldve taken with bishop instead of king so you keep castling rights
@dylankrejci99653 ай бұрын
No, because now that the king is on a haunted square, he’s invincible as long as he doesn’t move lol
@scar62862 ай бұрын
First guy could have rushed simp with his queen for an easy win.
@DukeBG3 ай бұрын
first game, the opponent had a very easy way to victory. Just shove his queen taking any pawn near the king, take the king next turn.
@fakeaname3 ай бұрын
One of these vids he’s going to go 1/3 and claim 100% win rate
@davidtitanium223 ай бұрын
the second guy's drawback is actually impossible when revealed you can't lose if you just put a king in a safe square and never move it edit: ok when you're out of materials you'll have to move your king but that also means you have 15 safe squares
@ShennaTheShinyEevee3 ай бұрын
could've just kept moving the king between two safe spots to force a draw
@iCarus_A3 ай бұрын
@@ShennaTheShinyEeveeactually, will need 3 squares in a triangle to force a draw. With just two squares, an opponent with 4 pieces remaining can force you to take once, then block the other safe square which you now cannot take back due to your own drawback
@CommentPersonAndStuff3 ай бұрын
@@iCarus_A Two adjacent squares are enough actually, the opponent's drawback states that he cannot move to squares that he has captured on, not that he cannot capture on squares that he has captured on, which means he'll never be able to move onto one of the safe squares making it impossible to force a capture, let alone block the other safe square.
@iCarus_A3 ай бұрын
@@CommentPersonAndStuff ah, i thought they could still occupy that square since... well, the piece that made the capture wouldve been on that square
@AlienGambitTime3 ай бұрын
Is this Simp's longest video?
@entrefilmes.emaratonas3 ай бұрын
The asian math is back! Great to see
@The-Anathema3 ай бұрын
I think dxe4+ was a mistake, Kxe4+ is better since your immortal king would seriously limit the squares he can go to, while also having the d5 pawn preventing him slinking away easily, this forces him to take his only legal move of going back to d2 and he's almost trapped (I mean, yes you have to shuffle the king once before you can capture again but you can just use the rooks to restrict him escaping towards the queenside).
@CSDragon3 ай бұрын
Wait, game 2 it's impossible for them to win after the king moves onto a haunted square. There's no "You can still capture the king" clause.
@gianlucatartaro13353 ай бұрын
Who else predicted the exact drawback of the last game? Like, EXACTLY 😅 I literally thought “Is it just that he must move his king whenever in check?”
@martinnolhaf31513 ай бұрын
Can't mate you without getting closer
@rohan18643 ай бұрын
what if we touched our kings 😳
@tianyuema47973 ай бұрын
10:36 Probably because Bxh8 There's another reason, but it's revealed at the end of the video.
@manstick643 ай бұрын
8:45 now how did we get to this position
@DidierLoiseau3 ай бұрын
11:20 I was expecting Nd5, forking the queen and the f4 pawn while protecting e3. What am I missing here?
@whosilence3 ай бұрын
On game 3 after b6 Simp had d4 trapping the bishop for so many moves Also instead of exf4, I believe kd5 was a better move in every sense, but I'm not sure if I'm calculating the drawback correctly here
@lknight12662 ай бұрын
Is no one gonna mention that game 2, the opponent literally cant win if simp leaves his king on a sqaure they captured on already?
@Sitam5193 ай бұрын
8:26 you should take with the king and show your testosterone
@nathkm3 ай бұрын
4:22 i just got that drawback lol
@josephzhu55132 ай бұрын
for game 3, 12... g6 blunders a rook
@joghurt423 ай бұрын
I always wonder why the AI pronounces "content" like "contempt"
@JannPoo3 ай бұрын
It pronounces it like "content" as the adjective not the noun. "Content" (adjective) means "happy", "fulfilled".
@EGJohnson13 ай бұрын
Can someone please tell me the name of the ending song Simp uses? I've been searching for hours and still have no idea lol
@jxiangwu2 ай бұрын
Bars Grabs BFFs Bfdg
@tres-37703 ай бұрын
I'm confused by the second game, how can you ever lose if you get your king on one of those squares?
@jxiangwu2 ай бұрын
Bose StarDFBS
@kiraacorsac3 ай бұрын
Oh come on. "My opponent was a lot stronger then expected" and you cut away? Why would you do that? I feel blue balled.
@sgas3 ай бұрын
8:52 didnt even say king takes the king And the timeskip was weird instead of a timelapse
@lonelyPorterCH3 ай бұрын
Oh wow that second game got unlosable after your king moved to that square he's not allowed to capture on Thats a drawback you should never reveal^^ Well, almost unlosable, you could get forced to leave it when it is the only legal move and there are not 2 of those sqaures next to each other, or you could lose to time
@lukemaker46713 ай бұрын
Anyone else watch men '97?
@NoomStuff3 ай бұрын
Video 222 of asking simp to play fps chess
@klop42283 ай бұрын
That last guy didn't block the check because it blunders a rook? EDIT: or a queen lol
@jxiangwu2 ай бұрын
Bose Stbr
@joshuamoyer33273 ай бұрын
5:48 Simp physically cannot lose G2. Even if he loses everything his king can just jump back and forth between 2 squares the opponent can't move to.
@elgatosancho38203 ай бұрын
Is this a Jojoreference?
@astral7-3 ай бұрын
Do a voice reveal
@rishabhaagarwal-cv5rd3 ай бұрын
38 minutes
@Chomta3 ай бұрын
drawback chess, but you have 2 drawbacks, and you dont reveal your drawback to opponent.
@sashagornostay21883 ай бұрын
Day 10 of asking Chess Simp to start a "Xiangqi Simp" channel
@trivu11103 ай бұрын
Stoping Teen from stoping Adult from stoping a kid to say first
@RoundShades3 ай бұрын
Ah, the vigilante hunter hunting vigilante.
@jxiangwu2 ай бұрын
Ergs Surge Bs Tr
@shheghhsother51863 ай бұрын
First
@roma5403 ай бұрын
10:35 Nice bait for everyone to tell you how it blunders the rook/trades it with light-squared Bishop. But yeah. Drawback.