This is the case that basically made the Commerce Clause a blank check to Congress.
@TooManyChoices1 Жыл бұрын
This is why Wickard Vs Filburn is such an interesting case. The allotments and subsidies placed onto farmers (who are engaged in a federally regulated commodity production with limits), makes the decision “justified”, yet still insane as congress attempts to use the “aggregation principle” outside of its limited power to regulate “industry” against “individuals” not engaged in commerce through the interstate commerce clause. This is also why the Texas Suppressor freedom case is very interesting, as it will definitely end up referencing Wickard Vs Filburn but Wickard should not be used to validate the clear over reach of federal authority without the same subsidies/allotment numbers of the commodity(suppressors)and in light of the clear Second Amendment challenges. Will be a landmark case, just as Wickard Vs Filburn was. Quite the turning point/shift in American jurisprudence one way or the other. Freedom or Nullification of Rights through capricious use of unilaterally unauthorized authority 🤔!
@paulschrader10527 жыл бұрын
Excellent narrative and very helpful in my Con law class. Thank you !
@THEPHANTOMHAWKE4 жыл бұрын
how was law school?
@hucklesnook18487 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for the video, it was very helpful with my assignment. I hope you're living it up somewhere, because you deserve it!!