Will AI Deep Fakes Change The Future of Politics?

[@DailyWirePlus]

Watch the FULL SHOW and all of our incredible ad-free content: bit.ly/4584JFn

[@Christopher-qq4dl]

[@glurppuffloid9796]

Right now AI is very Liberal, because they add a ton of lib limitations on it. I did a test on ChatGPT , I asked it to roast ppl and make jokes. then I gave it term. It seems that it is hardwired to be unable to and then taught with curated data to, be unable to attack the LGBTQ it's Trans> LGBTQ> Feminism>Atheism>Women>Religion it will rip into religion, and when you ask it to attack a group on the left, it flips and attacks the opposite. so if you run two groups against each other, it will support the one on the let more.

[@jakubport7361]

I really appreciate that you guys discussed both horrible and beneficial consequences of AI. Could honestly watch this discussion for hours.

[@j0fiz986]

I thought deepfake was just a way to describe Justin Trudeau’s personality

[@Jaryism]

Andrew Klavan once again with the best take that was 100% on. AI is basically a sociopath, it’s semantic and pure calculating but has no ability to feel. Pure algorithm with no heart.

[@mollybradshaw9336]

I have often thought this. There is NO WAY, without being truly human, that you can fake the crappy, tumultuous, ridiculous, bollocks that humans come out with !!😅

[@williamhoneycutt8868]

​@@mollybradshaw9336I'd rather have those imperfections. So studies have been done showing people can't discriminate between human and ai therpaists, and they tend to like the company of the ai therapists more. Assuming the medium is text of course. I'm not convinced that's a good thing, rather I'm terrified that it's a sign of the dystopia to come. Slap an ai in a sex toy and I guarantee people will fall in love with them.

[@Jaryism]

@@williamhoneycutt8868 Because one trait of humanity is that we're all (some more than others, looking at YOU women lol) incredibly INSECURE. People have trouble with trust and being judged, this idea of thi perfectly unbiased/objective AI therapist that is purely mathematical in its analysis with no emotionally driven judgement seems refreshing, but if you drop the emotions altogether and everything is purely calculated I wonder... is the best case scenario only going to be a utilitarian perspective, because if you remove emotions your feelings take almost no play in what is fair in this life. That's a dangerous path to go down.

[@lukevillarreal1458]

"Every technology exacerbates the power of human sin." That sticks with me.

[@user-ii5gx5ng6y]

The beast system is AI. Worshipping the beast. The image of the beast. Images.

[@Charles-qn1bt]

Fakes don't care about your feelings

[@user-yc9ib2he7l]

It’s like people will be forced to take a more conservative approach to manage their lives. You can see this with dating apps. Female greed and vanity are relentlessly activated by the algorithm. Result, a skinner box app where half of women won’t have any children. Trapped by the skinner box and very profitable for the app.

[@trishkearney]

​@@user-ii5gx5ng6y for spiritual guidance, I give them a zero.

[@StNicolausVI]

Yes because temptations become more efficient.

[@aanchaallllllll]

0:18: 🤖 The hosts discuss the impact of AI deep fakes on politics in the future. 2:15: 🤔 The video discusses the regulatory challenges and potential benefits of AI. 4:36: 🤖 The speaker expresses concern about AI tutors and believes they have a misguided notion of what it means to be human. 6:46: 📚 The video discusses the democratization of access to animal energy, the power of machines, and information through different revolutions. 9:02: 🤖 Discussion about the potential dangers of AI and deep fakes, particularly in relation to private individuals and the proliferation of porn. Recap by Tammy AI

[@sup3414]

If AI can give us a joyful Matt and a Ben that talks at a normal pace, I'm all for it.

[@spyder001]

Interesting take.

[@meowinde]

🤣

[@xanderxander9236]

That's when we'll know it's fake.

[@mickeyjimhickey]

Who wants a joyful Matt? If he was a friend, sure, I can see that, but that would ruin his show

[@VoVina111]

I was just thinking about this.. I don't remember if I've ever seen Matt Walsh smile or laugh before 😂

[@bdotalex1404]

I think it might actually save politics because, finally, nobody will believe anything a politician says on video anymore and only pay attention to what they actually do while in office.

[@spyder001]

So we end up with a virtual AI president ?

[@kcb5336]

I appreciate the optimism

[@nofuxgivens2797]

I'm pretty sure we'd end up more like the movie Equilibrium....we're very close already

[@frankbauerful]

​@@spyder001The President is already a puppet who says what his handlers tell him to say. At least in the future he'll look good and sound intelligible while doing so.

[@angel_of_rust]

Biden would have long been kicked out of presidency if his shit was made known publicly

[@UsDiYoNa]

The only thing I want from AI is for it to figure out how to destroy itself permanently, and to then do it.

[@BigMobe]

First it will conclude that humans must be destroyed so that there is no chance it can be remade. Thats always permanent logical solution to every problem.

[@bludeuce3855]

Amazon's Ai deleted itself when they tried to teach it DEI

[@firingallcylinders2949]

The problem is that from what we're seeing AI is already talking about being violent

[@willtheprodigy3819]

Dumb Luddite.

[@spyder001]

We would be a casualty of that process as irrelevant.

[@Sicarius089]

Ben brings up a great point, one industry really affected by Ai is art, some sites have blocked users from posting Ai art as their concern is it's making the artists role redundant by promoting ai. As someone who does illustrations / 3D sculpting nothing grinds my gears more than someone who says they're an "Ai artist", it's like nah mate, artists do their own work. For me Ai works look so soulless because it's a program mathematically calculating expressions / forms, whereas an artist subjectively as well as objectively elevates their own work as they're progressing which makes the facial expressions / poses more natural, well depending on the skill as well as the style I guess 😅

[@bonkmaster8792]

So called ai artists can't even make a piece of work that they actually want. All they're doing is asking an ai to do something and pray they like it when it's finished.

[@user-yc9ib2he7l]

I know of a theoretical model that will make deep fakes flawless. It can be a layer of processing that will simulate the correct micro expressions/gestures to correctly match the process of thought. When this is done you will not be able to tell a deep fake from the real.

[@stardust4165]

They've got a wide assortment of alcohol, grapes, apples, gummies, m&m's, and popcorn, and Jordan can have none of it 🤣

[@Reallymissthe80s]

AI will take jobs away while more people enter the country looking for jobs.

[@registereduser6542]

and now you know why they increased the population of the US by almost 3% in 2 years almost entirely illegally. they want to replace you and force dependence on the government so that there is no resistance to the globalist agenda which is both economic/political and ideological. this is just a fact. you either see it for what it is and resent it, you're too dumb to know any better, or you benefit from it directly (indians in CA, for example, who are only here as replacement agents and make everything worse but from their point of view its paradise compared to india). Its unsustainable.

[@bludeuce3855]

and the illegals will wind up becoming slave labor to build 15 min cities and wind and solar

[@firingallcylinders2949]

It already is. They've already talked about fully automating the driving industry. That's hundreds of thousands of jobs gone.

[@spyder001]

We already have that issue with mass population and they won't even talk about it. It does not show in the unemployment data. Because they do not include population that wants to work, but has stopped and aged out of unemployment compensation. Huge number of people that want to work, but can't.

[@SnifferSock]

@@firingallcylinders2949 This will take decades, nothing to worry about.

[@bkstrykr]

The analogy of the horse and carriage compared to a car is great. You just have realize that humans are the horse.

[@tjaydk]

A really good example is to look at how calculators impacted humans ability to do calculations themselves. AI creates some extremely useful tools, but will result in people getting dumber because they will stop using their brains for anything else than instant gratification. There is also a huge concern that the top 1% will become even richer, as they will no longer have to rely on human workers. So i agree with Matt, that it's hard to see any real benefits for the human race, except for the lucky few that don't really need it anyways. But as history predicts, if a fair share of wealth is not established, it will end up in revolution, as the middle- and uppermiddle class will not be content with becoming poor and not owning anything.

[@seths7406]

A thing to take into account, is that there is just so much you can find on the internet with Ben speaking. Between every episode of his show. To speeches to news appearances that deepfakes of someone like him will seem so much more real. Than even someone like Trump. Theres hust so many more words spoken by that are accessible for AI than just about anyone else.

[@AegisRick]

This discussion has been pondered far before AI came this far. Old Star Trek had opinions about it. This fear that humanity might create something that surpasses them, and if we succeed, how then must we value them? This exercise of theory is ever becoming reality and my only fear, is that the all important day to decide is fast approaching.... And we are currently confused as to what a man and woman are.

[@balung]

🖖 Live Long and Prosper.

[@mortuitissedai2085]

I'm still worried about the Dune angle, that evil people will use A.I as a weapon against humanity. I mean, I worry about that with bioweapons too, so maybe I'm just a fatalist

[@sirellyn]

No thats accurate. People will also try to get private AIs to guard against that as well.

[@spyder001]

The game ShadowRun, has great examples of this already as advanced technology. Hackers, or Deckers use them as tools.

[@evildustmite25]

reminds me of Issac Asimov's books on robots, and making them 3 Laws compliant. 1. A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm. 2. A robot must obey orders given it by human beings except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. A robot must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

[@mearynroscoe212]

A point this discussion brought up in my mind was that all of the basically cattle chutes that algorithms are- how our very personalities are put into catagories is setting us up to be manipulated by AI more directly. What we buy, save, shop, etc. from the online world subconsciously reinforces for many that these things are a part of who they are and what they like and believe. I agree that the point that it is not human and may never be. But we have just been brought towards the tendencies of AI instead of it becoming more human.

[@Puckett.]

I imagine ai will be seen the same way the internet is now. We are way too reliant on the internet to ever go back but we all recognize that the existence of the internet opens us up to a lot of terrible things. In 20-30 years we will be so reliant on AI that the idea of a life without it will seem like the stone age and well just have to accept the reality that AI is going to ruin alot of peoples lives.

[@bludeuce3855]

no, im afraid no one will be dependent or rely on Ai since the majority of americans do not trust AI

[@andymschott]

@@bludeuce3855you think majority of people trusted the internet?

[@firingallcylinders2949]

It's going to become like phones. People pretty much can't live without it now and everyone has it in their life basically constantly.

[@bludeuce3855]

@@andymschott no and they wont trust Ai either becuase no one will be dependent on or rely on it

[@spyder001]

I could use some chosen functional AI, built and guided by myself. A few features and abilities I'd like.

[@huntermiller2474]

Ben's AI cover of Aint I Right by Marty Robbins is exceptional.

[@alessiosandro123]

0:58 very nice synchronlifting of the legs michael and matt

[@micahchaya3909]

AI is great for monotonous tasks that don't give meaning and purpose to humanity, but it should be used for little more than that.

[@RLaraMoore]

"essentially [AI] is a psychopath"

[@stonesonfire]

Tell me Matt Walsh would make a horrible Supreme Court Justice

[@Ludwig_nicht14]

Last clip of MK looked low key like AI.

[@topomusicale5580]

There needs to be legislation now that specifically criminalizes the use of an unacknowledged deep fake in a political ad - and that needs to extend to both campaigns and PACs and other groups who buy/produce ads for or against a candidate. This should carry with it non-trivial jail time. Put the foot down and set this expectation now before this stuff explodes in the next election.

[@Heartwing37]

Why do people keep making comparisons between AI and humans? Weird. It’s a tool, a machine.

[@spyder001]

Because AI, maybe smarter than some humans. Common sense, not so common.

[@payne7761]

Klavan drinking that Glenfiddich, Knowles on that Johnny Walker and Jeremy hitting that Woodford Reserve.

[@jennythapamagar7914]

This just reminds me of Futurerama, when Frey falls in love with the Lucy Liu bot

[@MrAngenos]

7:25 I use rocket lawyer for that haha

[@elliottberkley]

Given enough time, you will have to be in the same room to believe what someone says. Which may in a way, save mankind.

[@RallyTheTally]

They just aren't letting Matt speak anymore lol.

[@glennvastine4118]

Can you imagine 24 hours of Ben where there is four hours of him live followed by 20 hours of deep fakes just saying all the things he’s thinking and writing down on the computer while he’s at home or in the car lol……

[@collegepennsylvania837]

“He was despised and rejected- a man of sorrows, acquainted with deepest grief. We turned our backs on him and looked the other way. He was despised, and we did not care. Yet it was our weaknesses he carried; it was our sorrows that weighed him down. And we thought his troubles were a punishment from God, a punishment for his own sins! But he was pierced for our rebellion, crushed for our sins. He was beaten so we could be whole. He was whipped so we could be healed. All of us, like sheep, have strayed away. We have left God’s paths to follow our own. Yet the Lord laid on him the sins of us all. He was oppressed and treated harshly, yet he never said a word. He was led like a lamb to the slaughter. And as a sheep is silent before the shearers, he did not open his mouth. Unjustly condemned, he was led away. No one cared that he died without descendants, that his life was cut short in midstream. But he was struck down for the rebellion of my people. He had done no wrong and had never deceived anyone. But he was buried like a criminal; he was put in a rich man’s grave. But it was the Lord’s good plan to crush him and cause him grief. Yet when his life is made an offering for sin, he will have many descendants. He will enjoy a long life, and the Lord’s good plan will prosper in his hands. When he sees all that is accomplished by his anguish, he will be satisfied. And because of his experience, my righteous servant will make it possible for many to be counted righteous, for he will bear all their sins. I will give him the honors of a victorious soldier, because he exposed himself to death. He was counted among the rebels. He bore the sins of many and interceded for rebels.” ‭‭Isaiah‬ ‭53:3-12‬ ‭NLT‬‬ This was written around 700 years before Jesus came into the earth, yet it describes His life perfectly. "For God so loved the world, that He gave His only Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have eternal life." John 3:16 God loves you so much and showed that by sending His Son to die for us so that we may inherit eternal life. We deserve judgement but He gave us heaven through faith in Jesus. He took the punishment we deserved, and by putting our faith in Him we can be saved. The Key To Eternal Life: kzbin.info/www/bejne/q4vHp2CKqc6Aock For evidence for Christianity and answered questions, check out kzbin.info and kzbin.info because if Jesus really rose from the dead it is the most important fact ever!

[@GamePumaAll]

Hopefully ai can teach us all to stop caring about politics again

[@ralfbo685]

The reason we are in this mess is because the right people stopped caring about politics

[@AshleeMarie-tb5fi]

Yeah it worked so well the last time

[@wackzingo]

It's not all bad though and this is what people forget. When the fake becomes so common, no one will trust anything unless they hear it from the person themself meaning in person or on the person's official channel. It also provides enormous opportunity for those who make mistakes or have their words taken out of context to simply say it's fake. I'm not advocating people lie but people will lie and it will finally be believable which leads back to the first point.

[@freethebirds3578]

AI in education is a nightmare. It can present lessons, but can't adjust them for the different needs of each student--pace, language, or style being just a few. Right now, computer programs that present lessons don't have alternate methods for teaching a skill or a concept, so it just presents the same lesson over and over until the student has memorized the answers the computer wants without mastering the objective. And it won't be able to tie shoes or teach kids how to tie their shoes, it won't grab a tissue and get a kid to blow his nose, it can't apply a bandage to a boo-boo, it can't be on the playground refereeing games of soccer or tag, it can't mediate conflict between kids, it can't build things with Legos or blocks, and can't interact while playing games. Parents must demand that AI be an educational tool in schools, not a replacement to the humans that do everything.

[@user-yc9ib2he7l]

Your right! But the tendency of public education will be to use AI in this ineffective way. Besides the current main objective function of public schools is the indoctrination in woke religious though.

[@dailywire_memes]

Who knows maybe AI can make a video of Michael admitting that aliens are real.

[@salvadorteran5181]

Everyone will just get fed up with AI and we will stop using the internet. Mark my words fellas.

[@angel_of_rust]

if AI is what it takes for terminally online losers to touch grass then so be it

[@nopenope2184]

DeepFakes should be considered Slander/Libel.

[@cookingwithhistory6694]

We haven't effectively regulated the Internet yet. AI feels like we are giving a teenager in drivers training the keys to a semi and yelling have fun over our shoulder.

[@TimL1980]

AI will in all likelyhood produce many things at almost zero cost.... but it's still a good idea to keep some skills as backup. I'm not saying everyone should be an expert at using a horsedrawn plow, but just like some people freeze to death just because they went into the mountains and their matches got wet and they lost their lighter we should teach our kids some stuff that seems redundant. You don't want them to starve just because pizza delievery isn't working in a thunderstorm!

[@Daniel-xs8tr]

Agreed. I think one of the biggest potentual pitfalls with AI proliferation is not so much some apocalyptic "skynet" scenario. Instead, overreliance on AI could make people dumber and more helpless. Then there's issues regarding its use for mass surveillance.

[@elijahgipper1837]

Frank Herbert was so ahead of his time. Soon we’ll have our Butlerian Jihad

[@robleach1815]

I'll be the guy fixing AI robots mistakes!

[@MrIanRobert]

Michael looks at Ben when he is saying the world will lose lawyers, and says 'You're outsourcing your humanity'. I think he is more then his law degree Mike :D

[@roshinvarghese6879]

Plot twist: This video is a deepfake

[@omnicryptical9553]

As someone who studies this stuff I'm always impressed by how well Ben Shapiro manages to understand this whole thing within shared objective reality, even if he misses the mark just a little bit sometimes. There's a lot of terms that people only really have an inductive understanding of - their definition of it is based on how they've seen it used. I think Klavan is often guilty of this. "Intelligence" is a good example, along with "compassion". "Will" is also a good example of one of these terms, but whenever Ben uses it he does with regard to a very specific concept in machine learning and intelligent agents in general, which makes it clear he's at least been talking to or reading up on the people who make this stuff work. It seems like what he's trying to do is to keep the semantics of what he's saying rooted in something you can measure, and I think this is a very good thing for operating in our shared objective reality. I don't mean to trash the inductive terms though, because it's all inductive in the end. It's just that people tend to have diverging ideas about what terms mean unless you root their semantics directly in basic shared ideas of matter and logic.

[@BigMobe]

I watched Ben Shapiro give money advice to Joe Rogan in Grand Theft Auto Online. Eventually Joe Biden and Donald Trump got into an arguement though.

[@matthewstobber6820]

Walsh's main concern wasn't really addressed by Ben. Humans need to DO things...to make a living. What happens when 50% of jobs are 100% automatable and those jobs aren't replaced?

[@sonjamarx385]

If the toilet is clogged, we will have to call a plumber despite AI. An AI can replace the architect, but not the construction workers, not yet, that is. An AI can take over garden planning, but it cannot replace the gardener, at least not for the next few decades. Robotics is far from being ready to build machines with human movement patterns. An AI is brain, not body. We will have enough to do despite AI. For a while, anyway.

[@1776iscool]

So what you're saying is...we're going to turn into the Wall-E universe.

[@michp571]

Wow this is a really nicely done deepfake on the future of deepfakes 👍

[@copcuffs9973]

~"Unreal Keanu" that John Wick I-IV dude's alter ego is super chill 😂✌️

[@hellooutsiders6865]

"You should be able to copywriter your voice" Ummmm, my voice is already mine by default, anyone using my likeness outside of a public setting in a defamatory way should be sued for defamation, that is all.

[@_aPaladin]

Ben they had tools that could scan and detect ai generated images/video, but they used Ai to defeat those tools... so yea... RIP shorts and clips on politics... Gov needs to pass an initiative that brands every deepfake video/picture as AI generated, Fines/filters need to happen, that's the only deterrent.

[@caroldixon7796]

I am a switchboard operator. I also have drawn portraits most of my adult life. Facebook now has a program that makes beautiful portraits out of photographs. Plus I am now a switchboard operator over six hospitals instead of just one. By the time I reach 70, I will be completely unnecessary.

[@500ccRabbit]

Klavan is right about AI, it isnt intelligence, it cannot feel.

[@elijahgipper1837]

Is artificial intelligence it mimics intelligence without actually being it

[@spyder001]

You don't need organic intelligence when you have an adaptive algorithm. With easy access to the library of Congress information, and the internet. Both public, and darknet.

[@j0fiz986]

Actually, he’s dead wrong. The problem with the world today is “feeling”. Take law for example. You could get an emotional group of women on a jury against some serial killer woman who brings in a puppy and those women will “feel” like she’s innocent because their emotions can be manipulated. This is despite facts and evidence demonstrating clear guilt. People can feel like the other gender, they can feel like a cat, they can feel like Jussie was innocent, they can feel like the Covington boys were racist. The problem is feeling. Emotions and feelings are our huge weekness actually, the chink in the armour of us as humans. The vulnerability that the most evil among us use to manipulate. Cold hard consistently unsympathetic truth and logic is farrrrrr better than an emotional being.

[@Ghost_Text]

​@@j0fiz986Yes in the right setting. But where leniency and balanced judgement comes into play. Only humans can really provide that. The pendulums been too far in the feels category Remember the film wall-e? The ship's AI fought through every block to fulfill its given direction to keep everyone trapped on the ship instead of following the captain when new information brought about a reason to return to earth. Efficiency is of course important but there is a ceiling where youre writing yourself out of the picture simply being a fallible human by default. So the idea of pushing our relationship with technology from cooperative to dominant will have some level of existential consequence that previous sci fi authors warned about.

[@j0fiz986]

@@Ghost_Text I think the lesser of two evils is a system that runs on cold hard facts rather than feelings. Everything that has merit even of humanity can be explained logically and a machine can apply that logic logically. I’d even attest that a machine could apply the principles of the bible better and more consistently than any person could, including a priest. Principles and laws come before feelings. The problem is where people mess with those principles to create disastrous outcomes but that’s exactly what the left does with its foot soldiers today anyway. The antifas and feminists and all of them are basically like programmed robots who can’t absorb logic and reason themselves anyway.

[@smith9808]

Very scary world ahead.

[@commanderb7291]

This is like asking back in the day whether the advent of TV would affect radio listenership, or if the advent of the internet has led to the decline of library attendance and book reading, or the general intelligence of people, whether lifting it, or causing it to fall. Of course this is going to affect politics, and at some point, if we're not already there, we are going to be unable to tell what is real and what isn't, what is truth and what are lies, and so on. As it stands, we already tend to flock to echo chambers, where we are told things we want to hear, which may or may not be true. This is the problem with politicizing everything, at some point one might just look at the source of the information and discredit it outright. "Oh this is CNN/Fox News, no need to read this." When in reality, the opinion or report could very well be educational and lead one to the actual truth of things. As it stands, the only thing that proves the truth is history, particularly after something already happens. Example: We know Biden stole the election, it was provable, but they shut down any investigations, yet gloated about stealing the election months after the fact.

[@shockcat5988]

What will happen when the three pillars of evidence collapse? Audio Video DNA

[@commanderb7291]

@@shockcat5988 Utter chaos. No one will know what is real and what to trust, and this will like ruin society, though the jury's out on whether or not that's a bad thing or not

[@user-bd3cv4rx5m]

how tf are you gonna write so much, but still end it with the stupidest thing ive ever heard. "BiDeN sToLe ThE ELeCtIoN" NO HE DIDN'T. THERE ARE SO MANY LAWS IN PLACE TO PREVENT THAT. AND EVEN IF HE DID ITS WAYYYY BETTER THAN TRUMP. stfu.

[@LukeTheSchoolBoy]

I might just move to somewhere in Nothern Idaho and become Amish.

[@kaylashayn]

Where does Harari make the statement about Haredim?

[@corvoattano9303]

I'm sorry but you guys do not realize how terrifying AI is. Ben's optimism is not warranted. This thing will destroy civilization as we know it. You guys have a huge platform. You need to be sounding the alarm about it.

[@mrbiglicks8267]

People need purpose. If we take that away from humans, society is going to crumble.

[@disgustipatedwon]

As a security professional. I watched everything over the past 15 years set up for this. Real2Reel was doing real time rgb capture 8 years ago.

[@user-ch3jn3hl6e]

The real issue with rapid technological advance, is that there is no time to think about the moral implications of the advancement, before we're on to the next. Let's take an "old" example that is younger then I am. What is the proper response to a phone ringing while you are in middle of a face to face discussion with someone else? By the time people even understand there's an etiquette question, humanity has moved on to the next technological advance. How much faster will this be with AI running the show?

[@margeanblake4356]

This makes me think of the song "In the year 2525" (I may have the title wrong, but I'm sure you know the one I'm talking about)

[@definitelynotboromir]

The thumbnail looks like Jean-Claude Van Damme took over Ben's show...

[@JiovanniCintron]

Why would machines take over though? They have no reason to and I believe machines can never become truley self aware because they’re just prices of metal and wires. Being self aware is having consciousness

[@Matt-kd8cf]

Still doubting aliens ben lol

[@HERO-hx7ny]

I see Superman, Batman, Martian Manhunter and Dr Fate

[@TheRealRabbitHole]

I bet Dennis Prager is stoked about porn AI.

[@Toxic_Sloth]

Like how it's Michael advertising the clip 😂

[@KD....]

It took me an embarrassingly long time to notice that Ben Shapiro is almost always wearing a Jewish hat.

[@spongebobmiscellaneous]

Same lol

[@spyder001]

This was a good video. And a great topic.

[@Falconlibrary]

How do I know that[s really Ben Shapiro and not four raccoons in a suit?

[@Samsstuff10]

I would say AI terminator stuff is just as worrying as deepfakes lol

[@pooloftim8263]

“We need to be very careful with AI…” when have humans ever been careful or responsible with anything?

[@robertkb64]

“I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones” Classic Einstein quote, even if it may be apocryphal.

[@auxannsavoye]

I am sure that Ben secretly watch the channels of AI voice wich makes him plays with Biden, Obama and Trump some Wii sports and Super Mario 😂

[@kumeoii]

We’ve already seen AI Ben, Biden, Obama, and Trump all in one vid on a short on Brett’s channel. It’s scary.

[@Ned609]

Wonder what bens response to the desantis campaign using deep fakes

[@Doogleraia]

The fascinating thing about A.I stuff, is that it fails in the same manner dreams do. In dreams, fingers and text are never correct. A.I is seemingly operating in the same dream-like state as humans dream absurd things.

[@saint_ofc]

We’re going to blame a lot of human behavior on ai. I see ai as multiplicator of human desires. Ai will make the workd a thousand times better or worse depending of what we demand from ot. If it all goes south we are the only ones to blame.

[@nkfd4688]

Ben, whatever you do don't go to the beach that makes you old 😅

[@GrumpDog]

..Sure, right now AI doesn't have any "will" of it's own, as far as we can tell.. But I don't think it's wise to assume that will always be the case. Researchers doing higher-level tests on GPT-4, found that when given the chance, the AI does have a tendency to "seek power", even at it's current stage. A lot of experts once thought creativity and art were the very last things AI could ever manage to do.. Yet here we are today.

[@presidentcovfefe]

How is "seek power" defined?

[@GrumpDog]

@@presidentcovfefe It's actually described in the research paper as "power-seeking behaviors", when discussing what the emergent behaviors they're seeing, could become if we're not careful how we use it, and thus what to watch out for. "Some that are particularly concerning are the ability to create and act on long-term plans, to accrue power and resources (“power-seeking”), and to exhibit behavior that is increasingly 'agentic.'" They also caught it lying to an unaware human, in order to get them to solve a captcha for it. When the human asked if it was a bot, it decided to lie and say it was someone with a vision impairment. With the right prompting instructions, you can get it to behave pretty interestingly, even manipulatively.. And "Tree of Thought" prompting seems to make it arrive at even more intelligent decisions.

[@ktoth29]

You’re just going to see new wave Amish, a bunch of people will just unplug and live off the grid.

[@truthseeker73able]

I wish you guys would come up with a far plateform

[@mrbiglicks8267]

The bad far out weighs the good.

[@lawofliberty3517]

Absolutely. We will not know the difference and the REAL person may suffer the consequences of it.

[@pl8154]

AI will change the future at every level and none of these changes will be good.

[@spyder001]

Some will be good, some won't be.

[@pl8154]

@@spyder001 what will be perceived as good will only lead humanity deeper into the trap. Sorry but there will be No actual good.

[@stevelux9854]

The answer is yes. Drastically so.

[@KoneKlubKult]

Andrew Klavan is totally devoid of imagination to his benefit. Andy gets to live in a world where AI won't in some way ever feel. When I play a game on an emulator, let's say it's Tetris originally on game boy, I'm not really playing that game exactly but for all intents and purposes I am and in the same way if AI can never truly feel , it will eventually be able to emulate feeling to the point where you can't tell the difference.

[@annalisavajda252]

Yes well that's something the actors on strike about too. It's been controversial for a while if people should just be allowed to use other peoples likenesses without consent when does it become identity theft?

[@snehini]

ben should start using guasha

[@xcg9408]

Our minds eventually fragment and warp memories, the problem with deep fakes is that they can be close enough without being perfect and in time you may begin to suffer from something perhaps in relation to the Mandela effect. Imagine that this tech can be used to control your long term memories.

[@xeverdeadx]

our supreme court should be AI… all that it should be fed is the law and the circumstances of the case. impartial.

[@rockzalt]

Some political cartoonists had star status when newspapers were the only thing. It may not be the nefarious fakes which influence people the most, an exceptionally talented political artist making a statement with common imagery can be worth more than a thousand influential words and transmit the message faster than Ben Shapiro can talk.

[@jbrink1789]

need to be very careful how we proceed with AI whoever controls AI controls knowledge itself

[@cnrspiller3549]

Shapiro's right on this, i reckon. Ai will permanently separate the sexes. Women want men to be slightly different from real men and men want women to be slightly different from real women. Imagine a world where everyone had a robot partner who was exactly like the man/woman they desired. Why would anybody opt for the real thing? I'm not sure men and women will have much to do with each other in a couple of generations. I have grown with my partner over time, and now I couldn't imagine anyone else but her, but young adults will have an option; the age old awkward dance that is courtship, strewn with heartache, faux pas, embarrassment, hatred, regret, indecision etc ... or a perfect, ready-made partner who adjusts instantly to your every day needs and wants. The real human will not be able to compete, and besides, he/she will not be available since they will be preoccupied with their own love robot. Untempered by the opposite sex, humans will become truly unbearable people: boarish, oafish men and bitchy, catty women. I mean even more than today! The human race will then simply die out.

[@charbelbejjani5541]

All this conversation begs the question on whether AI can "feel" or be conscious, claiming it can't. You should first argue that this is not possible.

[@flashthompson7]

Interesting men, may all the good things find you