Very good interpretation of the preamble and various provisions of the Constitution of India.
@idrismd88994 күн бұрын
Faizan Sir, I salute to you for the wealth of legal knowledge you are teaching us through your wave series. Excellent presentation , excellent clarity !! Thank you very much. People will appreciate and discourage the authority to go against these sacrosant concepts such as secular, socialist, integrity enshrined in our Constitution's preamble. Jai Hind!
@LalBabu-ve7kt2 күн бұрын
Excellent analysis Sir thanks
@ShaikhDawoodali4 күн бұрын
Very good speech 👍❤,🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@ABIDALIFIRDAUSI4 күн бұрын
Secular n asocialist are head n heart of our Constitution. Jai Samvidhan
@rajangupta12884 күн бұрын
Excellent presentation and brilliant analysis. Congrats. Hope you will continue to spread deep knowledge in the simplest manner in future also. ❤❤❤❤❤p
@rajeshkumarchand88023 күн бұрын
Excellent insight into the historic perspective on the subject and the shallowness of these petitioners. Sure CJI will rise up to the occasion in the judgement on 25 Nov 2024.
@05suhani4 күн бұрын
Brilliant analysis and explanation Sir
@yogendralalbharti57694 күн бұрын
Sir, we salute your visionary, valuable video.
@UsmanK-u9t3 күн бұрын
Well said.
@mohammadanwer6344 күн бұрын
Very fine explanation sir
@mohammad-sayeed99004 күн бұрын
Sir,you are a great jurist of our country and we the advocates of High Court Allahabad wanted to arrange a programe for your lecture on the present controversial laws.Sir with due respect we are requesting you to accept our said request.
@JavedAlamSiddiqui-j3b4 күн бұрын
फैजान मुस्तफ़ा साहब जो काशी मथुरा और अब सम्भल की मस्जिद और भी कई मस्जिदो के मामले है उन पर भी एक विडिओ बनाइये।
@basirrafai90684 күн бұрын
Aaj samvidhan ko jaanbujhkar taar taar kiya ja rha hai... Kyuki aaj " Batenge to katenge "super hit ho rha hai. 😂
@krishanuadityapandey44142 сағат бұрын
AIMIM and AIML are secular political parties !!!! Ridiculous double standards.😀😀😀😀
@madhudamle96193 күн бұрын
As usual very nicely analysed.
@DNSinghDNSingh4 күн бұрын
Most remarcable analysis by u .
@AftabKhan-lg8uc4 күн бұрын
Good information
@thelifeanddimension4 күн бұрын
The secularism can't b removed from any democracy and socialist is inbuilt in society hence it is reflected in constitution also...so damaging apeals shall be rejected in from bases.. Our nation is multicultural multilingual multi religious that makes it great..
@abansari85284 күн бұрын
Good analysis.
@abdulkarimzulfa86004 күн бұрын
Good reporting
@Assssss38654 күн бұрын
Educative topic
@brijendrakumar47462 күн бұрын
Very nice sir
@2ygamer9913 күн бұрын
asslamoalykum very very good news super super news apki sachi news ko hamara salam jaihind jai karnataka inshallah
@mujtabahusain24504 күн бұрын
The die heart will not accept the values and greatness of a Constitution world acknowledges as one of the best.
@mohdiftekarhussain61724 күн бұрын
SUPREME COURT JUDGE'S are NOT SUPPORTING PEOPLE of INDIANS, But ONE PARTY VICHAAR DHARA..
@Dadasahab12343 күн бұрын
They are not bowing before bhakts. 😮
@lourencodafatimasouza14794 күн бұрын
Accumulation of wealth in 10% Indians and 90% poor citizens is Capitalism opposite of Socialists.
@yogendralalbharti57694 күн бұрын
Relevant video.
@manasnayak40972 күн бұрын
Thank you Sir.
@subrotodutt23674 күн бұрын
Salut to YOU ........😊
@mosayeeed52244 күн бұрын
अस्सलाम वालेकुम सरआपके लिए जहां रहेगा वहीं रोशनी लुटायेगा। किसी चिराग का अपना मकान नहीं होता ।।
@ratanbhattacharjee72332 күн бұрын
The thinking which the outgoing CJI Chandrachud has expressed the old definition are redundant and need the new thinking.
@reyazkhan41892 күн бұрын
Wonderful lectur.
@Jas-jf8kj2 күн бұрын
Sir, UP police killed innocent citizens in Sambalpur and so many others places,is there any law against these killer police,
@amfaiziofficial7429Күн бұрын
السلام علیکم ورحمۃاللہ وبرکاتہ ، کیسے ہیں فیضان مصطفےٰ صاحب ماہر قانون داں ، اللہ آپ سلامت رکھے آمین ،
@arpitkumar29814 күн бұрын
If the SC does this, it might as well shut down.
@shawkatjehan10464 күн бұрын
Ur video gave a good knowledge of the Constitution, some words used in them n further words changed of similar meaning.
@NasirKhan-ci4kn4 күн бұрын
Jai Samvidhan !
@drshokatalisaiyed47332 күн бұрын
Shri Faizan mustufa qualified for the supreme Court Chief Justice, president , prime minister in the democracies nations of the world????? Is it good for the 5 trillion economy targets?????
@Anilkumar-yx8ssКүн бұрын
Emergency k dauran banae kanun batana hi hoga
@dilipbari87652 күн бұрын
Islamic theology not accept "Akhand Bharat". They think "Uamma". So, remove socialist and secular from constitution.
@shawkatjehan10464 күн бұрын
Inshallah Rahman!
@mdshahidraja36564 күн бұрын
Real muddo ko undekha karne ke liye yesab chal raha hai.
@krishanuadityapandey44142 сағат бұрын
Real muddo kya hai ??? Haz Subsidy, Madrasa Education, Wakf Board, Sariya Law, Halal Certificate and making India a bigger Pakistan!!!!!
@prashantkumar-fc8ro2 күн бұрын
Sir sambhal par video baniye aur places of worship act par thoda parkash daliye
@ankitgrover-r6x3 күн бұрын
🇮🇳 , our constitution is already secular, doesn't matter , either remove from preamble or not... But i want , our country should way its path towards France Model .. Religion should be private affair.... Not in public .. Jai Bhim Jai Samvidhan
@sultanahmad83334 күн бұрын
At present country isn't secular and social.....
@Seema-h8e2 күн бұрын
Sir made a video on sambal court survey report petition ❤
@nishantjaikari24842 күн бұрын
Outcome मैं अभी बता देता हूँ , के preamble से कुछ नही हट रहा Mondayकी आने वाली verdict मे.. इतना तो मै BJP aur Judiciary की राजनीतिक समझ ही गया हूँ..😅
@yousufnomani10832 күн бұрын
SC upholds secularism as the basic structure of the constitution today.
@madhubalasharma28224 күн бұрын
Excellent 👍👍 presentation and true analysis.Thanks Sir.
@junaid-r7n3g3 күн бұрын
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
@Sam_AgnoКүн бұрын
Janata bahut hi communal hai... Samvidhan ke secular ka danka peetne se kya hone wala...
@knowthyself68164 күн бұрын
Yess
@drshokatalisaiyed47332 күн бұрын
Are Court real pictures seen in this vedio of sri faizan mustufa???? Is it good for the 5 trillion economy targets?????
@ababeel97313 күн бұрын
Thank you Sir for Exlent information ❤ but dung etar ne Des ka Kimti Waqt Jaya kia karta hai
@farman3414 күн бұрын
❤
@rajamathews15512 күн бұрын
Agnipariksha. The word "Secular" can not be removed unless the judge is andhbhakt.
@dilipbari87652 күн бұрын
Kashmir is the best example from Islamic theologist who used socialism and secularism to persecution of Hindu pandits.
@robgsp104 күн бұрын
Please make a video on right to convert in india and anti conversion laws in UP AND MP.
@arulkumar46822 күн бұрын
Polarisation agenda to divert core issues.
@prabhatkr.83832 күн бұрын
D Y. Chandrachud ex CJI had already acted as henchman of Modi / BJP & protected all the illegal political deals as their watchdog: The holy Soul of P K Tripathi, M C. Sharma & NRM Madhwan law teachers of Campus Law Centre must be remorseful for teaching Chandrachud
@VikashSaini-dn8sv4 күн бұрын
❤❤
@subbaraoyerramsetty28692 күн бұрын
Threat is there
@srikantpatnaik28492 күн бұрын
How SC shall remove Secular and Social from Indian Constitution which included latter on by Smt Gandh when it was passed by Parliament. This Parliament should discuss it and take decision on it but not by Court.
@ritinitisingh54129 сағат бұрын
Sir , अपने विडियोज में अपने कानूनी अनुभवों के आधार पर , लोगों को बताए कि कैसे धर्मस्थलों के सर्वे के खिलाफ कानूनी लड़ाई किन आर्टिकल और अधिनियमों के तहत लड़नी चाहिए ... जिससे ये धर्म स्थल टूटने से बच सकें ....
@MonisFatima4 күн бұрын
Dar ke aage jeet hai. Jago India jago kabtak soote rahoge andh bhakti chudo aur Sab milkar awaaz uthao dosto Zulm Ziyadati Haiwaniyat Nafrat aur na Insafi ke khilaaf.Samvidhan aur Democracy bachalo dosto hamaara jamhori mulk khatre mey hai.
@arvindkumarmishra50514 күн бұрын
कालगणना काल्पनिक नहीं है और उसे भी समझने की आवश्यकता है.
@nazaf4u4 күн бұрын
💐🙏🥰
@Dadasahab12343 күн бұрын
These words were mentioned no where in the constitution. It was added much later. Anchor should have mentioned it before proceeding further.
@Usriri_48914 күн бұрын
हटा हुआ ही माना जाएगा
@shaikhmaheboob54513 күн бұрын
Shaik ❤❤❤❤❤786SM
@mohanpal48864 күн бұрын
If SC verdict comes against petitioners,Can parliament do this with this type of majority? Or can parliament call for a joint sitting of both houses to repeal these words from preamble?
@saminivlog7674 күн бұрын
Parliament surely can amendment in any part of the constitution acc to 368 .......but there is one limitation on Parliament'sower to amend the constitution and that is "basic structure rule " it says that Parliament can not amendment the constitution ki uska basic structure ko ap sampt kr de ... Now what is basic structure of constitution..like federalism,freedoms of judiciary,secularism...it's not define of expressly provided ..... In such case we can say that ..if Parliament amend the preamble and remove the it's secular nature..then SC will declared it unconstitutional because it's the part of basic structure of the constitution.
@NasirKhan-ci4kn4 күн бұрын
Apt question.
@MadhuRao04103 сағат бұрын
Added by modern muslim league to appease vote bank
@ajiswal1229 сағат бұрын
Sir aap kay legal class lete hai kaya LLB students ke liye..?
@jamalakhtar52534 күн бұрын
🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳👍👍👍🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳
@mintusaren8952 күн бұрын
Mere ghar ho kiya raha ,hum chicken deta hoon bibi chai banati hai. Itna hai nahi ,expect. Kanha low yoon ,baithe rahya hoon ,exchequerujhe de de.
@MadhuRao04103 сағат бұрын
Can you answer why the same words are rejected by ambedkar ?
@snverma8994 күн бұрын
What about ''INTEGRITY' ? It was also part of 42nd amendment.
@ravinderkaur-sv5pw2 күн бұрын
वसुदेव कुटुम्बकम,,,, ऐसा कुछ सुनने को मिलता रहा है,,, क्या है??????? कोई तो समझाए
@azibjaved42814 күн бұрын
Lucknow
@TheoSophii4 күн бұрын
Yes, These words should be replaced with godseist and hatist.😂🤡
@mintusaren8954 күн бұрын
Jo bhee podta hoon ,yad nahta , memory kaise qued kare.
@mobilefunda84874 күн бұрын
Agar secular nahi to phir Kiya?
@egnlish4all5504 күн бұрын
Sir voice improve kijiye please
@chandrakant238522 сағат бұрын
Yah kaun sa tarika hai ki ak cji chandrachud Dharmnirpechhata nikal Diya av dusare cji manyavar khanna ji samil kar rahe hai jab cha he nikal de jab chahe samil kar le
@AtifMukhtar-l6g4 күн бұрын
Court ka samay barbad nahi hona chahiye
@shreekantchaudhary42622 күн бұрын
Bharat ka Brahman kuch bhee kalpna kar sakte hai Brahman ko itihas se kuch matlab nahi hai unke kalpiinik ithas ko mano baki sab galat hai. Aaj enke kalpinik baato kee pole khul rahi hai
@tuahishussain39813 күн бұрын
poor audio quality
@MohammadAli-vf6dl4 күн бұрын
Assalamu
@fahmidasayyed56942 күн бұрын
Saren nabi to islam laye hai .aap kaise keh rahe ho islam nahi aaya hai .islam to aadam aur ibrahim bhi lekar aaye the
@parmanandpandey30823 күн бұрын
Very shallow analysis.
@shubhdarshanmalviya21504 күн бұрын
मूस्तफा साहब गुस्ताखी माफ, इंदिरा गांधी ने इमरजेंसी हटा कर चुनाव नहीं कराए थे बल्कि 1977 का पूरा चुनाव और सत्ता हस्तांतरण इमरजेंसी के दरम्यान ही हुआ था और इमरजेंसी बाद में हटाई गई थी। कृपया याददाश्त पर ज़ोर डालें।
@mintusaren8954 күн бұрын
Akhand bharat ,akhand mahabharat kanha hai.sadiya sal se mahabharat hai.
@qazimohiuddin54234 күн бұрын
"chote ! Aaj ki date ki roti kha raha hai toh aaj ki roti kha,suppose tujhe mahabharat era ki roti mil jae (jo possible hi nahi)toh tu osko digest nahi kar paega😂 ...
@parshuram5834 күн бұрын
आप भी मुस्लिम है मुस्लिम की तरफ़ झुकाव है जो स्वाभाविक है । कभी पाकिस्तानी हिंदू बांग्लादेशी हिंदू के बारे में बोला करें
@lourencodafatimasouza14794 күн бұрын
Adani should be the richest person in India?
@kaluramahirwar88604 күн бұрын
सोशलिस्ट नहीं अराजक हो जाओ।
@p_sndp4 күн бұрын
Secularism and socialist are added in constitution preamble in emergency. At the time of constitution making secularism word was already rejected by constitution assembly unanimously. At time 1976 emergency secularism word added in preamble. Secularism was failed due to partition of India takes place. After partition of India Pakistan became a islamic nation, then India should be Hindu nation otherwise it will injustice to Hindu's of India.
@SANJAYSHARMA-gi1kkКүн бұрын
👌🙏
@ajaysharma-1703 күн бұрын
Who was Gandhi ?does he was the owner of country...?how he represents Hindus...? Britishers want a friendly , government so that we don't declare them enemy country...