Judiciary Beyond Redemption? Katju Speaks His Mind

[@murtadah6327]

काट्जू साहब की इंसाफ़-पसंद तथा बेबाक बातें सुनकर बहुत लाभान्वित हुआ मैं। इसके लिए उनका बहुत शुक्रिया।

[@Godfavourite01]

I always admired Katjuji ..He is a gem of India .Today's Judges have no balls to be truthful like him

[@kfr7867]

Absolutely right ✅️

[@amriksingh3102]

Judge and judgment settles the balance of society. The balance between good and evil. Saturates the definition of good and bad. If corruption overrides society the fault lies in judiciary. Thanks Kapil ji for bringing justice M. Katjuji on Dil-se discussion

[@mrfacts6860]

😂😂😂😂😂😂 expected from someone like u

[@PraakashRanjann-fz7rc]

🤣🤣🤣🤣katju had big tongue to lick

[@UsamahUnwala]

Say something on Killings of Muslims in Uttarpradesh .Dont be so silent on Genoicide of muslims .Dont become Godimedia on Muslim Issues and killings

[@drpankajkumar9432]

कपिल सिब्बल साहब आप इस तरह का प्रोग्राम आए दिन करते रहें इससे समाज में फायदा होगा 😊

[@awadheshgupta5851]

लूट का ISIS INDI लूट जिहाद टुलकिट ने भारत में सनातनियों के 1947 से पहले हुए किसी भी अन्याय के खिलाफ न्याय के सारे रास्ते बंद कर दिए थे मात्र अपने लिए औरंग़जेबी रास्ता खुला रखा था

[@sethunair5566]

Mr. Katju sir is a brilliant man who has brilliant views on the judiciary system. At the same time Kapil sir is also a brilliant man who has great ideas to cleanse the rotten judiciary system. The questionnaire and the answer program is excellent and superb. I got delighted. Thankyou very much.

[@ANIRBANCONSERVATIONIST]

This urban naxal under the garb of a SC judge has caused enough damage to the judiciary.

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@RakeshKumar-ks9do]

He is very bold and straightforward

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@dineshchandersharma2451]

Sir, delay in timely action or judgement definitely adversely impacts society. Justice Katju is really a brave, bold, a person of impeccable integrity, which is a rarity.

[@UsamahUnwala]

Say something on Killings of Muslims in Uttarpradesh .Dont be so silent on Genoicide of muslims .Dont become Godimedia on Muslim Issues and killings

[@nsdhillon9937]

Justice Maarkande Katju sahib or Kapil Sibal sahib aap ko dil ki gehrayion se 🙏 from Punjab

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@ziahasan9817]

Very True Bharat Ratan Justice Katju db.

[@kssandhu4693]

Justice Katju is an ICON of Judiciary, sorry Kapil ,you did not use his vision n assessment to come out forcefully n judiciously. Thanks for inviting this great soul n true Justice to your platform..kp the good work up..Indian Judiciary can be revived to its best..Let’s all of us hope.

[@anwaralam9483]

❤❤❤

[@nutskishore]

Keep hoping, no end to corruption

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@murtadah6327]

२०१४ के बाद के CJIs बहुत controversial रहे; और इस बात ने आम आदमी की ज़िंदगियों को बहुत तकलीफ़ों में और इम्तिहानों में डाल रखा है।

[@kaushalkumar4711]

Brilliant talk/interview!

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@GpsgGPSGrewal]

Justice H R Khanna is legend like Justice J M L Sinha. For them country comes first nothing else matters..i agree with Katju ji judiciary is beyond REDEMPTION

[@sanadwi]

We are proud of Sir Katju for speaking truth

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@umairreyan9774]

Sir katju is a very learned personality,, He always puts forward his views in an unambiguous manner His entire persona could be summarised as Hazaro saal Nargis APNI benoori pe roti Hai. Badi mushkil se hota Hai chaman me deedawar paida

[@kfr7867]

❤

[@Prachi_Vaidya_Dublay]

These maestros, another league indeed! What brilliant conversations! Kudos!

[@paulm.k.8740]

Justice Katju.🙏

[@prasannakumar6144]

Kapil sir.. truly u r mastermind..

[@Jas-jf8kj]

Very informative discussion about today’s judiciary system, people are miserably being adjusted by their political connections,

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@gajendragurappa1645]

How many of you agree that our judiciary both HC & SC have been fully safronised & most of the judgements are favouring BJP/RSS?

[@rajkamal6401]

Fully agree

[@rangavesa2016]

100 per cent true.

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@a.rcreation1128]

Sir I salute mr. Katja aap jese justice ab kaha he ab to Sir Gulam he

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@jackyfernandes8803]

Lot of depth and wisdom in these conversations enjoyed it

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@m.k.rahman2012]

It's really a great discussion between the two great personality of India. Both of them are having highly respected and upright with great integrity . Exceptional personality and exclusively Mr Katzu is honest and upright person...... Great...Babri Masjid Judgement was discussed and given views against the Judgement......

[@nishantsonuley]

I have learned more about India in these 35 minutes, what an insightful interview. He should start a podcast or at least write a book or have more interviews - these interviews are going to be referenced in future by many generations for many years. Loved it, both gentlemen are gems. Really looking forward to more interviews.

[@Realchap]

Excellent 👍

[@afzahkhan8758]

Excellent interview.

[@josephcoutinho9322]

Excellent news anylisis sir 😊

[@drshabihsiddiqui]

That’s so evident. The writing is not on the wall only, also in the minds of people.

[@mubroormalik7000]

One of the greatest CJI India ever had

[@jafarhasanrizvi2493]

Beautiful and knowledgeable discussion.

[@drshokatalisaiyed4733]

Are Court judgement time limits required???? Is it good for the honest, skilled, poor people?????

[@kfr7867]

Absolutely required!!! I am not filing a case on my neighbors who have encroached on our property coz I know it will go on till probably after my death 😢😢😢

[@drshokatalisaiyed4733]

@kfr7867 Are suo motto required for the time limits judgments??????

[@parvaizbhat5619]

Great people

[@michellemoraes1699]

Why are court cases delayed beyond 25 years ? Is it because the Judges are inefficient to take decisions ? There should be limitations on the Court cases based on the gravity of each case, but not beyond 10 years.

[@tuhinbanerjee2103]

Very nice discussion, indian judiciary has lost his dignity.

[@jamshedalam1846]

U are 💯 right sir. 😊😊😊😊😊

[@sunilgtandon4305]

Ye 2 precious gems hain ayse log hum ko aage nahi milne wale itni saaf sutri unbiased knowledgeable demanding discussion jo desh hith me hai salute to both the legends. AAj judiciary shak ke circle me hai govt ko andar se support kar rahi hai kaise hoga desh ka bhavishya. Chandrachud 100% hand in gloves the sirf drama kar rahe the.

[@amirmalik6028]

Two of pillars of Experience and knowledge 👍🏻👍🏻

[@pradeepshubakar4033]

Wonderful interview, hats off to j. Kayzu

[@abedmansur3100]

Katju is brilliant and very straight forward and in favor of Truth.injustifes been done to Muslims community. Katju agreed Babri Masjid was a disaster decision against Muslims community.

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@jerry-ms1bz]

great man katju

[@drpankajkumar9432]

जस्टिस काजू साहब ने Back to Basic या Fundamental बताया, याद दिलाया जो CJI चंद्रचूड़ साहब जानते हुए, नहीं जान सके ! इतिहास चंद्रचूड़ साहब को कभी माफ नहीं करेगा ! Absolutely no difference between YB Chandrachud (पिता)and DY Chandrachud (पुत्र) ! However, I believe CJI Sanjiv Khanna will certainly uphold name of his uncle Justice Khanna.

[@awadheshgupta5851]

लूट का ISIS INDI लूट जिहाद टुलकिट ने भारत में सनातनियों के 1947 से पहले हुए किसी भी अन्याय के खिलाफ न्याय के सारे रास्ते बंद कर दिए थे मात्र अपने लिए औरंग़जेबी रास्ता खुला रखा था

[@cedricdias8764]

I personally feel the Supreme Court has failed to check un-ethical practices by politicians, by not passing orders in time.

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@vinu366]

Chandrachud was spineless.

[@PraakashRanjann-fz7rc]

Katju has very big tongue🤣🤣🤣

[@UsamahUnwala]

Say something on Killings of Muslims in Uttarpradesh .Dont be so silent on Genoicide of muslims .Dont become Godimedia on Muslim Issues and killings

[@chandballabh8839]

Excellent analysis....thanks Mr Sibal.

[@pseudonym9215]

Among failures of institutions of government in Independent India, maybe no other is as momental as failure of Judiciary. And I am not just talking about it's failure in last 10 years.

[@kfr7867]

Sadly yes coz to us all The Judiciary is the ultimate giver of justice !!

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@josephthomas1180]

Justice Markandey Katju can be considered as the rarest of rare CJI, it was the misfortune of the country that we could not have him as the CJI of the Supreme Court. You cannot expect the PM who was formerly a chaiwala to have the wisdom and principles of Justice Katju of not attending public functions like the Ganesh puja at former CJI Chandrachud 's residence. I expected you to inquire with Justice Katju the burning issue of having EVM system of voting which is being rigorously manipulated to favour a certain political party. Whether ballot paper system of voting should be put into practice for all future elections.

[@ecomatters3416]

Well said

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@rajenlama.6850]

Jai Hind sir. Obviously to some extent federal power of Indian Judiciary is diminishing through the central government .

[@fasihullahkhan3247]

High court Allahabad के एक जज(शायद जस्टिस सुलेमान नाम था)Scientist थे

[@SharfuddinShaikh-h6q]

Kabil sibbal ji aur katju ko dhanyawad 🙏

[@jamalakhtar5253]

❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@siddiqansari8003]

Yes i agree.

[@samadhan4861]

Thank you Sibbal sir

[@vilasnimborkar3513]

कपील साहब सीजेआय चंद्रचूड की भी मुलाखत लेलो

[@murtadah6327]

बहुत सुन लिया उनको!

[@drshokatalisaiyed4733]

Are the European election system & indian election system different in the democracies nations????

[@Govindarajan-rf5kk]

It is Katju who made Muralidhar ad judge, but unfortunately present have not allowed him to became judge in SC. Lost opportunity

[@AltafAnsari-uq3md]

A gem in indian judiciary justice katju, brilliant interview.

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@shaunbird8051]

We want some leader to come forward and inspire & motivate the people on true PATRIOTISM. The people have forgotten who is Mahatma Gandh! This land is now a true Banana Republic. Jai Hind !

[@nandu1952]

Whatever we say and debate now there is no use..... irrevocable damage is already done to this beautiful country. There is no respect and fear for Supreme Court now.

[@sajjadkhankhan5299]

This is the state of Indian democracy that minorities will have to stand in front of guns to vote

[@krishanuadityapandey4414]

Musalman should enjoy similar special rights as religious minorities in India as Hindus are enjoying in Kashmir valley as religious minorities for last 70 years. 👍

[@adwianya]

@@krishanuadityapandey4414 But now those religious minority is in problem due to the inefficacy of your current govt.. live in present rather than living in the past!

[@Jas-jf8kj]

Spreading lies, visiting there and not found anything like this,

[@krishanuadityapandey4414]

@@adwianya Which kind of efficiency was shown at the time when atrocities against Hindus took place in Kashmir valley???? Those criminals who encroach properties belongs to others and committed atrocities against others always advise others to 'live in present' and not to asking about incidents happened in past to avoid their punishment and to continue their illegal encroachment.👍 If you truly want to live in present then at first leave majhab which was propagate in past to spread hatred as jihad, jizya tax, maal-e-ganimat and so on.

[@anarchicdrifter]

​@@krishanuadityapandey4414splendid whataboutery, kudos

[@drshokatalisaiyed4733]

Are a Political policy, constitutional policy, economic policy , social policy, religiously policy etc effected in the nation OR not?????

[@nikon.m]

I was glad to see that kapi sibbal respected a dissenting opinion from justice katju. It was a healthy and open discussion, something I don't get to see on tv channels. Thanks

[@maharanathakur9750]

Pahle Campus Subversion aur ab independent judiciary ka poorntayaa Subversion ho raha hai.

[@udhabakoushalia7194]

Good discussion ❤ thank you .❤

[@irenedsouza8017]

People have a right to know

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@sarvenderamar9787]

Mr. मार्कण्डेय काटजू साहब 💺 Quite HONEST to the Citizens of the Country....!!👍🤳🤗⚖️

[@ajv1947]

A GREAT MISFORTUNE for India that our judiciary is COMPROMISED.

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@prithvirajmudappu3717]

An excellent extempore interaction between two stalwarts on the health of the judiciary. An eye-opener on the present status of the Indian judiciary. Thanks Gentlemen for an enlightening interaction .

[@rahulnrana1310]

Absolutely yes, it's a treat to watch Katju Sir speaking so fearlessly

[@sankarankarakad7946]

Remember what u said on CJIs retirement, Mr.kapil

[@rangavesa2016]

It is customary in any farewell party to say the good traits of the retiring person.

[@rangavesa2016]

It is customary in any farewell party to say the good traits of the retiring person.

[@tafa9097]

In feudal times trials were held in open court and even today we hear stories of how judgements were delivered. They did not have TV but everyone knew what the King said and did just as if he were on TV.

[@aqilawarsi]

I salute for your best conversation both of you 👍✅

[@mohammedahmedullah7173]

Worth listening and watching karju sir,sometimes confidence build simply watching his speeches

[@drshokatalisaiyed4733]

Is USA court arrest warrant for the Indian big business man sri Gautam adani good for the judiciary?????

[@rafiqibrahim1538]

Chief Justice Markandey Katju’s rectitude and professionalism is beyond reproach . Interestingly he is being proficiently interview by an honourable scribe! No interjections. No Interruptions. By Mr. Kapil Sibal. This Interview must be showcased in Journalism Training Institutes..

[@rjhaveri8bh]

Infact the reality is since 1947 the supreme court of India is a dynasty just like the congress party. Till date supreme court judges are only appointed from 300 families in India and the right to select a supreme court judge is only given to the Chief Justice of India since 1947 so that outsiders cannot break into this circle this was a well thought up plan. and hence it does not surprise me that common man has lost faith in justice and hence it took 75 years to get ram mandir verdict. Supreme court Judges given shares of national herald by Nehru. Let me give you some example - If current Supreme court Katju Martande son of Supreme court Judge Shiva Nath Katju. His grand father Governor Kailash Nath Katju happens to be partner of Nehru in National Herald, has shares so cob web of dynasty. I dont think we got independence from the British rather our nation was only outsourced to the congress party and the fact is the independence act of India does not speak about independence only dominion under the british crown. But such things are not taught in our history books because our history is written by the British is full of lies and congress who was outsourced by British followed what British masters want them to do. . So long only a few select families got rich this is what they always wanted. Congress was a group of loyalists and same is the case with Muslim league both parties were formed by British for vested reasons. The congress teaches us wrong history & now there is an organized effort to call Kashmir is not part of India this is being done in a systematic way by congress party & communists in India. Our History books does not record many of the below facts about India Pakistan partition and so our history books only teach what British and Nehru and congress allowed us to know. - The british created fake partitions, keeping 30% seat reservation for muslims, bribed a pork eating, alcohol drinking Jinnah and beef eating Nehru to partition India, using the psyche of muslims when 90% Indian muslims voted to create Pakistan. The British had already planned partition of India soon after 1857. The British created muslim league themselves in 1906, The memorandum of Understanding of the Muslim league says their agenda is to be loyal to the British crown. The president and office bearers were all British loyalists and exactly the same was done with Congress party they included the British loyalists but then it was the job of the British loyalists to manage the ordinary members who could be nationalists. The leaders may be sold out but there were few nationalists in both Congress and Muslim league. - We are not told that the fundamentalist's and hardcore muslims did not want partition but the British wanted Partition so they employed Jinnah and Nehru two loyalists to lead the two nations. It is true Muslim were used at catalysts for partition but it is also true that many fundamentalist's Muslims and hardcore muslim did not want partition. So partition was actually due to the vested interest of the British. Actually Muslims were like Rats and the British were the pied pipers who made them follow to their tune. As a proof of this I can ask you to look at the results of the 1946 provisional election, and you will note the Islamic parties never got Muslim votes ( I dont know how this is even possible) these Islamic parties lost while only Jinnah's Muslim league got 90% muslim votes. According to me Pakistan was created by british using fake elections. it was only the zamindars, and some power hungry bengalis who wanted Pakistan but british played a cleaver card via Jinnah to create it into land for islam as until that point there was no country made for a religion only 2 countries israel and pakistan have that distinction. - We are not taught in History that during the partition India and Pakistan, the two countries were divided based on religion although the religious significance of Pakistan territory to the Hindus was like mecca to muslims or vatican to christians , yet still the British forced the partition and gave the 10000 year old hindu lands to the muslims.. The fact is that Pakistan is the Brith place of Vedas and Hindu religion and same also is true for Sikh religion how is it possible the Hindus and sikh would have agreed to give this away with out violence but this is british managed and orchestrated everything. there was no choice given to anyone. We had to accept what the British were prepared to give and our leaders had to manage the masses. - Hindus who were in Pakistan were given no choice, Either leave our ancestral home in sindhi over night & flee to India or be killed or forcefully converted to Islam. - It is taught in history Jinnah wanted to create islamic state for muslims, but this is not correct , if you listen to his first speech after pakistan was formed , in that speech he said he wanted a pakistan for all minorities and muslims, If he wanted to make secular nation then why he sepated from India, this is because he did not have choice the british were making all decisions they were to folllow only. another point gandhi told jinnah to become PM but Nehru refused, so these two had setting with the british, both jinnah and nehru. churchill was writing private letters to jinnah without any ones knowledge. The muslim league was created by british themselves in 1906 and its charter was loyalty to the british crown. - We were told that the partition of India & pakistan happened based on religion, after 90% muslims voted for Pakistan in the 1946 provisional election this is historical facts, that Pakistan was made for Muslims, & India for hindus (but then how India and when India was forced to become secular nation). During the partition the population of Muslims was 92 million muslims in Undivided India. The population of muslims who went to Pakistan from India was 5 million and the Population of muslism that went from India to Bangladesh (East Pakistan) was 5 million. So at the time of partition 82 million muslims stayed back in India and only 10 million muslims went to Pakistan and Bangladesh (East Pakistan). This despite the fact that 90% of the muslim population had voted to create Pakistan. So East and West Pakistan took 10% of the muslim population but took 35% of the land and resources. - The total population of undivided India in 1947 was approx 390 million. After partition, there were 330 million people in India, 30 million in West Pakistan, and 30 million people in East Pakistan(Now its called Bangladesh)., So after partition there were 9 million HIndus still left behind in Pakistan forming 22% of the population of West Pakistan and 11 million Hindus left behind in Bangladesh (East Pakistan) forming 27% of the population of East Pakistan as per the 1951 census in both these territories, but within 40 years the population of Hindus in these regions killed, exterminated and as per 1991 census only 1.8% hindus were left in Pakistan and 7% Hindus were left in Bangladesh. After that Pakistan stopped counting the hindu population in subsequent census, instead counted them as minorities together with other shia, ahmediya minorities. Where as in India the 82 million muslims who formed just 8% of the population has now increased to 19% muslims where they got opportunity to progress. - In 1947 90% Indian muslims voted for creation of Pakistan and then later the same muslims stayed back in India and claimed they were loyal Indians. If they were loyal why did they vote for creation of Pakistan. So there is a part the Muslim played but it is not true that all muslims were part of this plan. But when Pakistan was proposed they did vote in favor of Muslim league. - But after a lot of hardship when my grandparents reached India post partition, they learnt that only 5% Muslims went to East and West Pakistan. Since 90% of the muslims stayed back the population of East and west population was reduced to just 10%. Where as we came to a over crowded in India, as 90% of the muslims who lived here never left. - Now we are told that riots happened between Hindus and Muslims during the partition. But the facts is that The 1947 riots were manufactured by British, the British loyalists starter the riots, the person who started the riots in Nakholi west bengal by burning alive 5000 hindus in factory, his name was gulam sarwar, his family migrated to UK and became members of parliament in UK. The riots spread naturally due to fear of each other. It is human behaviour to attack others to protect ones own self, British used our hatred for each other against us. .British used oue own corrupt people to divide us, exactly as they did to defeat first indian emperor in battle of plassey, using Mir Jaffer the army commander of the Indian ruler.

[@Govindarajan-rf5kk]

Even the election petitions are not heard

[@tapanbasu5096]

Very good discussion

[@s.m.p.72]

Much appreciated.. Truly, common man is losing faith in the impartiality and effectiveness of Judiciary these days...

[@maharanathakur9750]

U U Lalit aur T S Thakur Plus Arun Mishra k bayaan dhoond lo .

[@iftikharsahi8107]

Sir ❤geo you both l am from Pakistan living in USA

[@fishyslogger5590]

Awesome discussion!!

[@manoharanthottarath7071]

I greatly admire and respect the views expressed in this video. This video should be seen by many people, as it contains important legal and ethical issues concerning our democracy. For sustaining and promoting democracy in the country, our judiciary has an important role to play.

[@MohanAcharya-s8e]

Thanks

[@AbdulKalam-yw3zs]

We believe Honorable SC Judge Katju Sahib is man of value ! Long live sir!

[@nipamkumarsaikia2]

Mr Kapil Sibal, you are one of the very few persons in present India whom I take seriously. But you praised Justice Chandrachud in the farewell meeting as if he was a genius. Now where is the point of this discussion?

[@sreekumarpillai9957]

Geniuses need not have the required integrity.

[@krishanuadityapandey4414]

Nothing but hypocrisy.👍

[@adwianya]

Are you in your right mind??? Will you criticise your colleague who you don't like in his farewell meeting???

[@nipamkumarsaikia2]

@adwianya Are you in your right mind to understand what I have said? Am I saying Chandrschud should have been criticised in the farewell meeting? Supreme Court is the last hope for all Indians. Praising him in the farewell meeting is one thing, calling him one of the best CJIs is another thing.

[@amitmathews1884]

Critical analysis of judiciary.. Very important discussion!

[@maharanathakur9750]

Kapil Sibbal is a politically correct person . Baahar aayiye aur UPPSC J mein jaanch chal rahi hai. Entire system is subverted in states.

[@JV-nt9bp]

Fantabulous 👏🏻💯% Agree with the Maverick ❤😊

[@dpcdadapeerbyanisbhai1078]

BEING AS A AN ADVOCATE THIS TYPE OF VIDEOS TO KNOW THE ABOUT HONOURBLE JUSTICE KATZU AND GREAT SIBAL JI VIEW OF JUDICIARY AWARE OF LEGAL

[@parthadatta246]

Many thanks for this excellent interview in which the Indian judiciary has been denuded.

[@nazrulhassan6310]

great talk

[@NileshTharwal]

It's quite a good discussion. In now a days. giving hope for next

[@Mark-mx2gw]

Justice Katju is a man of amazing intelligence when it comes to judiciary and other issues .He is the last man standing in Indian judiciary .

[@praveenseth8893]

Very nice conversation 🎉🎉

[@chandramohanmenon7181]

Very good

[@bravikumar8950]

👍👍👍

[@fredashah6873]

Thoughtful listeners can only appreciate the wisdom,and moral and intellectual integrity of Justice Markamday Katju. Only an honorable Judge rises above petty prejudices and conflicts rampant in society, to deliver justice untainted by political, economic or personal interests.

[@kishorzala9638]

Salute both of you 🙏

[@Abdullahsworld-islam]

News content is informative

[@aunahmed231]

Great talk! It is not easy for a nation to be a democracy.

[@AbdulKalam-yw3zs]

Long live Honorable Judge Sahib , you a valued treasure of Judicial history of not only India but also for the world at large! Best wishes and may Allah bless you!

[@tazirulhoque3926]

Great 👍