William Lane Craig - Does God Know Everything?

[@georgegrubbs2966]

Craig is a master debater, so he can manipulate any argument on any claim. He can equally argue for a God or for no God. I have heard all his arguments and learned nothing except his skill in debating.

[@steveburris6543]

Feel sorry for God. He knows everything and how he will react to everything. He is locked in into his Being with no change possible.

[@wet-read]

God did not have to create, yet chose to, right? Do you have any idea how ludicrous this sounds? Why should I waste one nanosecond worrying about what an entity said to be all-powerful thinks or feels? How utterly insulting.

[@keepcalm7453]

Happy holidays, CTT!! 🙏🎄💝❤

[@telemarcelo]

If God is absolutely certain that there isn't anything bigger than It, then it knows everything.

[@Move_I_Got_This-b3v]

God knows everything.

[@glenliesegang233]

Humans cannot accept anything beyond their belief systems. They cannot ultimately know anything to it's depths. So they create conceptions. Atheists can shoot at those conceptins. So they believe they have shown God is merel a ridicous conception in some human's mind. Your conception of your dog is not your dog. If you can only conceive of things, and not see that you are mistaking your conception fort the thing itself, how can you think beyond your conceptions? By definition, God is beyond conceptions. Because God is inconceivable, you reject what you cannot conceive as possibly having an existence beyond the mundane definition of "to exist." Make sense?

[@En_theo]

@@OneMan-wl1wj But does he know how to create a man who has true free will ? Because obviously, if God knows everything, then he will know all that man will do and therefore by choosing to create him in such or such way, he will be setting that life and things will only happen as planned. This brings the question, could God creates a dice that is truly random ?

[@pauldorman]

@@OneMan-wl1wj That's reassuring! Tell me, given that: 1. God chose to create _this_ universe and not any other possible universe, _knowing every consequence of that act of creation_ (God knows everything, right) 2. You are a consequence of that act of creation, and you are a part of the universe that God chose to create 3. God knew of every thought and action you would have throughout your life the moment he brought the universe into being (knows everything) Can you think any thought, or perform any act that God did _not_ know you would do?

[@Brody.W]

God knows everything 😅🤣😂

[@realitycheck1231]

Knowing refers to the state of having knowledge. God is all knowledge. Perception is not the same as knowledge; while perception refers to the process of receiving and interpreting sensory information, knowledge encompasses a deeper understanding and awareness of facts. God does not have senses because God is a non-physical idea.

[@realitycheck1231]

To know is to be certain. ⁴Uncertainty means that you do not know. ⁵Knowledge is power because it is certain, and certainty is strength. ⁶Perception is temporary. ⁷As an attribute of the belief in space and time, it is subject to either fear or love. ⁸Misperceptions produce fear and true perceptions foster love, but neither brings certainty because all perception varies. ⁹That is why it is not knowledge. ¹⁰True perception is the basis for knowledge, but knowing is the affirmation of truth and beyond all perceptions.

[@realitycheck1231]

Knowledge is the state of knowing. While perception is how we interpret reality.

[@ppmealing]

I have to confess this is an issue I’ve always had with William Lane Craig, from when I first came across him on his website, Reasonable Faith (15 yrs ago). And the issue I have is the way he assumes, with an almost unquestionable authority, that he fully understands the mind of God. Lane seems unaware that, when he has these revelations that ‘God is even more cognitively perfect than omniscient’, it's an intellectual fabrication of his own making. Note the use of 20th Century anthropomorphic terms like ‘cognitive’. All Gods are a projection of how we see ourselves, only at a supra-human level. Then he talks about someone else’s intellectual fabrication of God (prompted by Kuhn), a 16th Century Jesuit theologian, Luis de Molina. Note that God is restricted by logic, just like the rest of us (6.50). Note how he brings God’s will into this, which makes everything contingent on God. So there are alternative universes that God selects between. Sorry, I can’t help but be cynical as well as sceptical. Craig’s explication of ‘middle knowledge’ is how to overcome the apparent contradiction between God’s omniscience and an individual’s free will. Yet he starts the discussion with God ‘knowing’ what he and his interlocutor would or would not do, with the inference that God intrinsically knows all of us. I find this a sleight-of-hand: God gives us free will, so ‘He’s’ not responsible for our sins, basically; yet God must know if someone is a homosexual or not, just to give one controversial and eternally perpetuated example throughout humanity’s existence.

[@CarlosElio82]

If God does not how it feels to be a sinner, then he does not know everything. To be a sinner is to know that you have intentionally done wrong to a person that did not deserve it. I know that feeling because I have sinned, in that sense of doing wrong. But God himself does not have that knowledge_ Maybe he can imagine it, but it would be like faking it. I think Craig trapped himself in a self-referential paradox.

[@wet-read]

The concept of sin is broader than that, tho. In addition to transgressions against others, it includes victimless crimes*. I can't take seriously a moral system that lumps them together. * by victimless, I don't mean that they are not problematic or potentially problematic, but simply not things done TO another person. Someone doing this might cause them to be analogous to actual victims, but that is distinct

[@realitycheck1231]

In ACIM, "guilty' refers to the belief that you have committed a sin and are therefore deserving of punishment, essentially an illusion created by the ego, while "guiltless" means recognizing that this belief is a false and that you are inherently innocent and without fault, reflecting your true nature as a Son of God. The core teaching is that you are always guiltless, even when experiencing feelings of guilt. Recognizing your guiltlessness is achieved through the holy spirit's help, which reveals the illusion of guilt and guides you towards forgiveness. This is why Jesus forgave everyone, by forgiving he was also teaching forgiveness.

[@sciencefirst7880]

If God does know everything... then everything is his own doing.

[@LuisHernandez-u7r8v]

Simple answer..... Yes....God is all knowing....☝️

[@LogicStandsBeforeGod]

So-called Christian's 'god' created Adam and Eve and Christians' 'god' did not know that Adam and Eve will fail the test of God but expected perfection from them, then later Adam and Eve came out to be imperfect being, then Christians 'god' shoot himself in the foot, as you know in the Christianity and its belief that god sacrificed god to god to save god’s creation from god. What a nonsensical faith.

[@EvilXtianity]

Source?

[@LogicStandsBeforeGod]

So-called Christian's 'god' created Adam and Eve and Christians' 'god' did not know that Adam and Eve will fail the test of God but expected perfection from them, then later Adam and Eve came out to be imperfect being, then Christians 'god' shoot himself in the foot, as you know in the Christianity and its belief that god sacrificed god to god to save god’s creation from god. What a nonsensical faith.

[@roqsteady5290]

@@EvilXtianity trust me bro

[@John75Mulhern]

​@@roqsteady5290 don't say "trust me bro", come up with a source or else you're just like this Craig guy

[@panmichael5271]

Yes Zeus is all-knowing. Even when he's dreaming.

[@Atheist-o3n911]

Knows everything.yes

[@EvilXtianity]

Then why does he allow evil?

[@Atheist-o3n911]

@EvilXtianity he is blind, good as well as bad he is mad

[@stephenbailey9969]

Much more than the knowing of facts. Too many believers today have been taken in by a modern deist/dualist mindset where the created realm has some kind of separate existence from God. The older understanding is more encompassing. "For in him we live, and move, and have our being; as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also his offspring." (Acts 17:28) "And he is before all things, and in him all things hold together." (Colossians 1:17) This physical reality is being sustained every moment by the mind and power and will of God. Nothing is apart from his will, either direct or permissive will. There is no distance between His mind and all contingent, created things.

[@JCATG]

I am genuinely happy to see that you Closer to Truth people have 'remastered' the quality of this interview with Dr. William Lane Craig by Dr. Kuhn. I remember watching an upload of this before that was way outdated in quality due to the age of the content itself. LOL! God bless all of you and I hope youʼll do the same remastering with your other interviews with similar philosophers of religion/theistic scientists!

[@MS-od7je]

Knowing the image in which we are made and understanding that we are created in the image of God that is more same as the likeness of God. However God made us in his image and likeness. Understanding the fractal that is this image it is understood that what is claimed and communicated is fractal. Hebrew is fractal. All communication is fractal. Communication relies on functions of the commutator those to whom ( Or that which is) communicated to and with. Pragmatic communication is the understanding of the communicator knowing what the subject communicated to will and will not( fractal in time, space, etc.) Thus if God communicates to Moses but also to us then the same language ( words, syntax, semantics, literal and pragmatic communication) can mean entirely different things in time, space, etc. Given the above: When communicating “ kinds” “ images” and “likenesses” when not communicated separately are understood in context of the other two. There are kinds of things. There are images of things( patterns by which we identify things in time and space and in reference to other things… even if it is the same thing it is different in time and space) . God is a “kind” of thing. We are made in the image and likeness of God. However created other things are also made in an image and a likeness. Understanding the fractal image and that everything is a function of that same image. Therefore plants and animals are made in that image ( we just are in a nearly full image not a rotation or vibration pattern-image-transformation) What is it like to be a bat? Idk exactly but I have some idea. God is not us. We are not God. God claimed “ I am that I am”, being itself. God curiously seems to know us by leaving us. How we behave without God communicates what it is like to be us to God. However since this is all mathematical the end can be known if and only if you created the starting conditions. God only creates the universe God created because it is a thing created in the image of God.

[@aroemaliuged4776]

A simple man cares for his wife and his children William lane Craig is in deeep

[@gettaasteroid4650]

(2:06) propositions are entities, especially in so far as some variable could change the truth value, therefore non-propositional knowledge would have to also be sufficient for knowing everything

[@KeithWhalen11]

Hitchens steamrolled Craig in their debate.

[@ttown918]

He looks like he could be a long lost brother of David Lee Roth.

[@hyperram]

The Source may not understand the Creation. Because of its importance I will quote the verse in its original in Sanskrit: यो अस्याध्यक्षः परमे व्योमन्त्सो अङ्ग वेद यदि वा न वेद ॥७॥ He who is the presiding deity of this universe in the supreme sky knows it or does not know it.

[@fatalheart7382]

Because Reality is contingent upon the power of God the words, "to know", mean a very different thing for a Being who creates and sustains the existence of things like the present and future. Does prayer change what God knows? No. But it changes what He allows to be.

[@nuqwestr]

Craig seems to "know" the "unknowable". How can anyone take him seriously?

[@WaveFunctionCollapsed]

so if i abûse or talk dîrty to a guy on earth do god hear a beep sound as cens0red bcz if he heard those word he not all good if he didn't then he is not all knowing

[@ethioutopia4389]

The Ultimate Truth So Far Is Everything Is Confusing Hence We must be confused. when things are confusing what else would You feel? confused right? Yes strive to be at peace with that confusing reality! :)

[@Nickname_42]

Is God an Imagination?

[@Roshan-q6n]

What is it that is imagining that it is conscious of itself? That is no imagination. That is what is unborn and shall never die.

[@mrtienphysics666]

Of course.

[@johnjazz2244]

Between Jordan Peterson, Russell Brand and William Craig, I choose William Craig, because he is the one that uses less words to talk non-sense.

[@ronhudson3730]

Seems to me that he is trying to define God’s reality in human terms with human limitations. God is the Alpha and Omega. In the infinite past and for the infinite future, God is the foundation upon everything that exists, exists. God provided for the universe and defined the parameters of the universe, so that it could exist, develop according to the laws of the universe and in time allow us to come to be. God knows all, is all. God allowed for us to be, knows us as individuals and is there for us to lean on or have a relationship with, if we so choose. When you pray, God listens. When you need a shoulder to cry on, God is there. God knows all, for all time.

[@yfcanaan1386]

An omniscient being,doesn't get rage and wipe out villages with floods. Because he knows people are gonna sin so why the sudden anger?

[@justinhartnell6779]

Because of your Damm question.

[@earth11113]

God must be omniscient, to be God. Therefore, He knew every sin you would commit, before you existed, but allowed you to exist, anyway. He co-exist with you, as you sin. God already had perfection. To be truly infinite, He had to create imperfection and experience that, thru free-will creatures. I think of it like this: we leave a comfortable home, and go primitive camping. We return feeling fulfilled, more than we were.

[@Whowinsthebillion]

let's talk about God being The most generous , well I don't agree with that , a generous person is someone who give something that has value for himself to someone else , if someone has 100 $ and give awy 50 $ then we can call him generous, and if he gives away all his money then he would be very generous , but for God can't be true , because He can't giveaway all what he has , unlike human being that can giveaway all that he has , God can't do the same because He has unlimited possession , so he can't give it all away.

[@S3RAVA3LM]

Do people understand the language of the Divine? - of course they don't, for it takes years to grasp. Omniscient in the context of God is not like the 'Knowing All Things' that man potentially can. God is one without a second - some intellect, reason, discipline and Will is required to understand this....for what is there for God to Know? Little transient temporal existential events? Imagine the very Knowledge of knowledge itself, and the very Logic of logic, the very Essence of all essence....for God there is nothing to Know. Therefore he is all knowing, for there is no avidya or ignorance in God. Where there's no ignorance what is there to know?... Platonics, Vedanta, Hindu metaphysics, the Rsis - praise to them.

[@dennisbailey6067]

To answer.I wouldn't know.

[@anonymousperson799]

WLC is a master in using a lot of words to describe something that isn't based in reality. We should simply avoid this man.

[@Jodogio]

He explains things very straight forward and simply. You just lack the mental capacity to understand.

[@edwardprokopchuk3264]

@@JodogioI’m curious as to what exactly did you understand from this video? I agree that he is one of the most articulate theologians of today, but the theological gymnastics required to defend the fallible notion of “free will”, is truly astounding.

[@glenliesegang233]

"Reality" and "God," as used by humans who try to condemse a world beyond conception into ideas, then make decisions about those ideas, then use emotion to back uo their decisions. Quantum physics claims "realities" which are beyond conception, and to classical physicists, that something doesn't spin but "does," is and is not a wave or particle, etc ( look at the currrnt proton models!) Information is not real (as what holds it is, but it's sequences do not exist except as comparisons between the physical objects which hold it, so "it is real," The mental experience of color is not real, it exists as patterns of neuron firing, but is not in itself a thing ( Mary's Room thought Experiment) For the materialist ( and, i pity your spouse or children) love is not real, ultimately it is Dawkin's selfish genes which cause progrsmmed neuron activation geared towards the nurturing of young and maintenence of close social connection, which improves longevity. If your conception of God is ridiculous, of course you reject it. But if you mistake your human conception as "What God is" you will never know if a God Who is Beyond All Human Conception exists. We have Shakespeare's words and plays. To demand to see Shskespere during a play is ridiculous. To demand to see God is ridiculous. Yet we have phenomenon which strive towards goals, something that nothing random can do. Wecan examine atoms- utterly non-random. No group of non-random properties of their make-up can cause what atoms do. Water is so non-random scientists are still makinv discoveries about it. Look up Motor Proteins, especially Drew Berry's animations. If you believe random joining of atoms to make up the very first motor protein and microtubule, or thatthe code can be found in smaller pieces which spontaneously joined to just hsppen to create them, you simply do not have a clear conception of how scientifically impossible ( odds

[@SandipChitale]

Only Deepak Chopra can beat him.

[@edwardprokopchuk3264]

@ 😂

[@SugarRushTimes2030-gs3qp]

If God uses photons as neural pathways and the universe is God’s Brain and can see the beginning and end simultaneously bc of entanglement…then probably

[@aaronrobertcattell8859]

can not see past the choice you have not yet made

[@ThomasSoler-slainyoutubeadmins]

God is all powerful and knowing in a plural sense and collective effort. It is a network of minds but you always go back to the source or the Divine Server Matrix as an inter connected world. Yeshua already gave hint of 'Oneness' where he uttered, "Split a piece of wood, I AM there and lift up a stone and you will find me there.". It is akin to a computer where all data falls within the operating system and the progams are intelligently design. - Thonas Soler, One World Government, Religion and Leader

[@Bboar_969]

Why are you asking him?

[@OneMan-wl1wj]

Talk about muddying the waters. Omni/all scient/knowledge = all-knowing. Not that complicated. There is simply nothing God is ignorant of. God is knowing of all things at all times and in every moment. A being perfect in knowledge. So what might be a rational approach for dealing with something with such knowledge? I would suggest humility might be a good place to start.

[@Arunava_Gupta]

Nice video. I also have an analogy which I think would help to illustrate my own view in this matter of God's omniscience. God knows all that's necessary to know. Suppose if I were to build an ecosystem for fishes -- an aquarium, say. Now, I would of course know everything about this ecosystem as I built it. Every bit about its internal topography etc. But I would also know the general facts regarding the fishes living in this ecosystem. I would have a great idea regarding what it is like to live underwater all the time. I would know the behavioral traits of the fishes and have a good idea regarding their psychology. Although I would not know their precise thoughts at any moment in time I would know the kind of things they would likely be focusing their thoughts on; and also the limits to their imagination. I could even know each of the fishes individually! But of course it's not necessary for me to know all their "private" details contained within the recesses of their consciousness. It's also beyond the realm of possible knowledge. Moreover, even in respect of their public life, I would not be interested in knowing what they do at each and every instant of time and what they -- free-willed, independent souls each one of them -- do in future (where they go, how do they behave exactly with their fellow fishes and so on). But I would always know the bounds within which they would operate, the kind of actions they could perform and their general behavioral traits. And so it is, I believe, in respect of God and us conscious personalities too!

[@Kritiker313]

I'm a bit wary of anyone who cites Ronald Reagan's name to make a point.

[@Maxwell-mv9rx]

A lot rambling. How he knows absolutetly How figure out God mind? Absolutetly Impossible . He proposition is rambling gibberich. Proof logic out. Senseless.

[@LuuLuong-bn8iy]

😅😂😂😂😂

[@Sharky1101]

This man refers to God as “he”. Now why would God have a gender and how do we know what that gender would be?

[@TurinTuramber]

Just an artifact from language.

[@claudiozanella256]

God doesn't know everything. The reason is that you are sure that God had TO MAKE HIS DECISIONS! But the ONLY REASON of an action of deciding is that you do NOT KNOW the outcome of that decision beforehand, this is why you decide: to pick one of many possibilities! If you already knew the outcome of your decision, then you didn't need that decision! In other words, it's in the unavoidable mechanism of any decision that you don't know its outcome. It is thus demonstrated that God was not omniscient before deciding. He got omniscient only after making all his decisions.

[@Roshan-q6n]

So, says the person who claims to know the mind of God.

[@claudiozanella256]

@@Roshan-q6n God respects logic, this is why you are here on the earth suffering. Without logic, God would command "everybody happy and good fellow"...but God cannot do that.

[@Roshan-q6n]

@claudiozanella256 Nonsense. You don't even know yourself, so how can you know God. First, discover what you are and stop pretending that you know God's intention when you're not even aware of your own.

[@claudiozanella256]

@@Roshan-q6n Just a sweeping statement of yours that doesn't address my comments, thus useless. In short "don't investigate on God's nature because it's impossible to get to something". Well, it's not true. Do what you like and I do what I like.

[@Roshan-q6n]

@claudiozanella256 It is the only thing that is true, and that is know thyself

[@baronvonhoughton]

Does he know he's imagery though?

[@justinhartnell6779]

So do you believe yet Mr Kuhn?

[@ansleyrubarb8672]

...Please, just think, if you are Eternal, no Past, present, or Future, now think not using your Time constraints/limited unperfect Entropy life, yew GOD Knows All Every & Every All, Perfectly. HE is the, Absolute Truth & will always, all ways be the Absolute Truth, respectfully ordinarychuck hotmail... captivus brevis... you tube... Blessings...How Wonderful is GOD...If GOD granted you the wish/desire to know everything, you would just blow up where you stand...Please think about this carefully... Blessings...

[@alanw505]

If God actually exists it is the most evil force in the universe.

[@Roshan-q6n]

Physical existence comes and goes. Consciousness does not come and go with physical existence. It has always been and always will be.

[@Brody.W]

Jesus Christ of Nazareth 😅🤣😂

[@MonacoBlast66]

So concise and scientific!

[@aroemaliuged4776]

This fairy 🧚 doesn’t exist Show a proof that god exist The burden of proof is on you

[@hilmyahmed6446]

?

[@Elaphe472]

People like Craig are not worth even listening; if we lend our ears and ask them questions, they might grow, feel important, when they just utter empty words and nonsense.

[@Brody.W]

Thanks! JESUS CHRIST OF NAZARETH 😅🤣😂

[@LuuLuong-bn8iy]

😅😂😂😂😂😂

[@SandipChitale]

Which god? Brahma? Vishnu? Zeus? Posiedon? Mithras?

[@zeroonetime]

Does God exist?? Yes and n0, do your thoughts exist, yes and n0. Because they come and go as they ma, in the realms of the infinite potentials. On and Off, switching, one way or the other, and yet all the same. 010

[@HassanAmeen-q8d]

😅we are free to eat, so we sometimes eat that our sin is gone through jesus Christ also we eat that dajjal is coming, likewise we have eaten many things so now we are this and it's on all.....and this is a weak point to humans because we eat and it acts and stays on all......now i am searching for more weak points like this 😅 you can join me in the journey 😂😂😂😮😮😅😅

[@PEM-zt5rd]

William speaks as he has been God for a long time as he explains in-depth the amount of knowledge and what knowledge God would or would not have 🤣 he has truly lost it.

[@LucifersSlave]

Imagine you’re a parent who brings a child into the world. You raise them with love and guidance, but as they grow up, they make their own choices. If that child creates something harmful, like an atom bomb, are you responsible for their actions? Should you punish yourself for giving them the freedom to choose their path? This analogy draws a parallel to God creating beings with free will, emphasizing that free will entails the possibility of good and evil choices. The creator (God or a parent) might bear responsibility for setting things in motion but isn’t necessarily culpable for the individual choices made by those with autonomy. The key idea is that free will involves risk, and the responsibility for harmful actions lies with the one who chose them, not the one who provided the capacity for choice.

[@markanstrom2981]

God has an uncanny tendency to value the free will of perpetrators much more highly than the free will of their victims. And God's worshippers praise him for it every single Sunday morning.

[@mjfraser04]

Yes, parents are ultimately responsible for the life of the human that they selfishly decided to create. Nobody asks to be born. Due to that lack of consent, it is that who made the choice to create a a life who is ultimately responsible for that life and everything that life does. However, we can’t hold the parents legally liable (as this has been attempted in court) BUT morally and ethically speaking, we can. Same goes for your god. A god who would create a human without the ability of obtaining consent and then punish that human with eternal punishment for a finite thought crime (not believing/worshiping).

[@rafaelb7920]

@markanstrom2981 If God prevented all the wrong acts of human beings, none of us would be exempt, therefore, we would all be forced by God, none would have free will and we would all be like robots.

[@mjfraser04]

@@rafaelb7920 That has nothing to do with my comment.

[@rafaelb7920]

@@mjfraser04 Sorry, that answer was for @markanstrom2981. I will also respond to your comment.

[@BocaAvilez]

God is the minds of men. The utter speech. In the beginning was the utter of god. And knowing is memory. The present is not a memory. Language might be the issue for most people.

[@withershin]

Define everything... oohh this guy uses the p and p not... nothing like binary logic. Easy math.

[@spitfirered]

But Where Are The Truth's And How Are They Found And Not By Man's Words!

[@ii-pw6dy]

he doesn't because he doesn't exist (obviously). case closed.

[@spitfirered]

So If God Created Us Knowing We Aren't Perfect Could He Know What Is Perfect?

[@0-by-1_Publishing_LLC]

*"So If God Created Us Knowing We Aren't Perfect Could He Know What Is Perfect?"* ... I know that 1 + 1 ≠ 3, so does that mean that I couldn't know that 1 + 1 = 2?

[@robcgrant]

Some offense to William Lane Craig but you should really bring back David Bentley Hart

[@charleshanley2170]

5 minutes in it already stupid and boring.

[@garruksson]

nonsense

[@ryngrd1]

Mathematical truth exists. Moral truth exists. Jesus is that light 😇🙏🏼

[@TurinTuramber]

What is moral truth? Are you going to ignore the 4 billion years of no maths and no morals?

[@ryngrd1]

@TurinTuramber mathematical truth and moral truth have existed since the beginning of time. Existence is good. Jesus is the light 🕯️♾️🔥😇

[@akowal8882]

This guy...again. 🤦‍♂️

[@kipponi]

Middle knowledge😂.

[@Joshua-dc4un]

sophistry

[@janhoogendijk8604]

Scientifically talk about God.That's for me not closer to truth.

[@evaadam3635]

"Does God Knows Everything?" GOD knows what you believe now because it is an available information existing in your mind, but GOD does not know what you will believe next because it is not an available information yet... ..the reason why GOD can not know is because your WILL is no longer GOD's WILL but separate from it, as you are HIS free split with free will to believe anything for any reason... The Universe was once deterministic and predictable as it followed a certain path being driven by natural laws designed by GOD... ..but after GOD introduced lost souls (His free splits) to this Universe for a chance of salvation, this World is no longer deterministic because free souls can choose to believe anything for any reason and free to act on their beliefs that can drive this World in many undetermined directions... ..by the way, it is not the future that GOD knows but the effects of what is existing now.... and because GOD does not know what you will believe next, then it is impossible for GOD to know the effects of a belief that is not existing yet....

[@panmichael5271]

Yes Zeus is all-knowing. Even when he's dreaming.