Join the raffle for a chance to win a custom USS Texas Xbox - wowsl.co/3Apb0ly
@leviedvalson67985 ай бұрын
Happy happy early and or related birthday
@Dominic-yz3jr5 ай бұрын
Hi historiograph I love your channle🎉❤😊
@NicolaiAwesome5 ай бұрын
My dad fought in the Atlantic. Midshipman on HMS Suffolk (there for Bismarck), and later on convoy escort to Russia. He was 17 in 1941. Just a kid. He never spoke much of it all but did write an autobiography fortunately - He was older than I am now when I was born (in my mid 40’s). My interest for all things naval has been there since the beginning and so has my gratitude for anyone who has gone to war for our safety and our democracy. Not forgetting what these men and women sacrificed isn’t only important, it’s essential, now more than ever, and that’s why channels like Historigraph will always have my support.
@morgan974755 ай бұрын
Has his autobiography been published? If so, please provide the title so we can read it.
@punkypink835 ай бұрын
if his autobiography is purchaseable please tell us the name and where we might buy it.
@kegfreak37285 ай бұрын
My dad was on a liberty ship in 1944-1945. I need to do some research as to which ones. I have the medals and he has Atlantic and Pacific medals. He went all the way around the world. He didn't talk much about it and died when I was young, before I joined the military. Kind of sad we are losing our families stories because these guys didn't think much of their sacrifice. Funny thing also, my dad was 48 when I was born, so like you, we probably missed a lot of the stories we would have heard if we were older.
@NicolaiAwesome5 ай бұрын
@@punkypink83 It was only written for family. It’s a great read, my dad had quite the life post WW2, but the wartime stuff is just a few chapters.
@punkypink835 ай бұрын
@@NicolaiAwesome well im definitely envious your family have the privilege of reading about his experiences!
@chandler2245 ай бұрын
Just wanted to say that I absolutely LOVE your use of graphs, charts, and statistics. I've seen numerous documentaries on the Battle of the Atlantic but having a visual representation of US production and convoy/U-boat loses really puts it in a perspective. It's almost mind-boggling to see.
@Jameskn15 ай бұрын
It’s just as important to control the resources and supplies as it is to control the battlefield this is the often forgotten part of most battles and wars great to see it being highlighted
@jonathanwilliams10655 ай бұрын
This is why Russia is guaranteed to lose any invasion of Europe They know they don’t stand a chance so the fear mongering is a bit ridiculous
@dynamo17965 ай бұрын
Not really. Ever since the infamous "amateurs talk tactics, experts talk logistics" quote became mainstream, people have been banging on about logistical elements non-stop lol
@douglassauvageau72625 ай бұрын
The Bauxite supply-chain highlighted in this presentation illustrates the truth of your assertion.
@Mathwayb5 ай бұрын
I've always been in awe of the sheer industrial power the US had back then. The wonderful graphics in the video really highlights this.
@looinrims5 ай бұрын
Still has
@matthewblairrains60325 ай бұрын
@@looinrims Not really China builds 47% of global shipping South Korea has 25% and Japan builds 16%
@looinrims5 ай бұрын
@@matthewblairrains6032 …industry is more than merchant ship building…if you didn’t know that
@UsuallyTrolling5 ай бұрын
@@matthewblairrains6032 The USA isnt even trying right now though.
@matthewblairrains60325 ай бұрын
@@looinrims What like not even having the industrial capacity to build an extra submarine per year despite both Congress and the US Navy wanting them to
@Basicallybaltic5 ай бұрын
One plane that is not mentioned, but however shown in the video for a short snippet, is the PBY Catalina. It had the range and loiter-time to sweep vast pieces of ocean on single flights. Near the end of the war in the Atlantic, they had equipment that could find german U-boats at extreme ranges. When they then approached, preferably at night when the U-boats were more likely surfaced, they would switch to their close range systems. These were large basically water flashlights, that would illuminate the U-boat, forcing them to make a choice, ditch the communications equipment and pray that you submerge in time, or stay on the surface where it you versus a Catalina with a variety of weapons that are designed for a single purpose that it has proven very capable of, sinking the very thing you are in. Most chose the first, but now they were a hopefully intact submarine stuck in the middle of the dangerous Atlantic with no communication whilst being lengths the human mind can barely comprehend away from any submarine den or safety. After some time of no communication the german strategists back home would consider you MIA. This was the real power of a single Catalina.
@rachitkumar10125 ай бұрын
Well said! Always loved greyhound solely cuz of the Catalina lol
@UsuallyTrolling5 ай бұрын
Leigh lights
@Basicallybaltic5 ай бұрын
@@UsuallyTrolling Bro if you saw a video avout them, please tell me, I swear I’ve seen a great video about the Catalina, and your mentioned Leigh lights, but I cannot remember the name.
@UsuallyTrolling5 ай бұрын
@@Basicallybaltic I remember Lindybeige talking about them in his video: "The Battle of the Atlantic: U-boats and how to sink them"
@Basicallybaltic5 ай бұрын
@@UsuallyTrolling Can’t thank you enough, found the vid I remembered but hadn’t watched through completely yet.
@UsuallyTrolling5 ай бұрын
"American ship printer go brrrrrr"
@dynamo17965 ай бұрын
Between American industrial muscle and British science/ technology, the Germans were on the path to defeat. British technology like radar, ASDIC sonar, HUF-DUF and code-breaking combined with American aircraft design and ship building made for a powerful logistical machine. Getting it done since 1914: GB🤝US On the Merchant Navy, which at the outbreak of WW2 accounted for 33% of the whole world's merchant fleet, King George the VI made this speech in September 1939: "In these anxious days, I would like to express to all Officers and Men and in the British Merchant Navy and the British Fishing Fleets my confidence in their unfailing determination to play their vital part in defence. To each one I would say: Yours is a task no less essential to my people's experience than that allotted to the Navy, Army and Air Force. Upon you, the Nation depends for much of its foodstuffs and raw materials and for the transport of its troops overseas." "You have a long and glorious history. I know that you will carry out your duties with resolution and with fortitude, and that high chivalrous traditions of your calling are safe in your hands. God keep you and prosper you in your great task".
@rdeEKINS5 ай бұрын
I'm glad someone else noticed that too
@greg_42015 ай бұрын
lol
@greg_42015 ай бұрын
@@dynamo1796 1914????? 😂 wtf, man...?
@Intrepid42643Ай бұрын
FAQs lol😂
@danko65825 ай бұрын
Hats off to the lads of the Merchant Marine, who bore the brunt and won the war.
@woot-qf45 ай бұрын
The most underrepresented branch of the military
@benwilson61455 ай бұрын
It was the British Merchant Navy that did the most of the work and had the most men lost! Let us remember them!
@Frizzleman5 ай бұрын
Those liberty ship numbers are beyond absurd it’s unbelievable
@Spectre49132 ай бұрын
All the numbers are when you think about it. Trucks, planes, tanks, gun, uniforms, food, ammo. The awakening a sleeping giant quote couldn't have been more true.
@aaronrowell69435 ай бұрын
That moment you realize that the US replaced almost all tonnage sunk by the U-boats in the war with the liberty ship fleet and on top of that made 50 new aircraft carriers
@Cailus35425 ай бұрын
Well, 20 or so fleet carriers, plus ten fast battleships, but yes.
@atfeldman1234 ай бұрын
If you smaller carriers like Jeep and escort carriers more than 100 carriers were in the US fleet by the end.
@SeanKStephens5 ай бұрын
with every one of your videos, I find myself more in awe of the true scale of World War 2.
@Damorann5 ай бұрын
As much as I find that politicians get in the way of their military leaders most of the time, for this once I have to give credit to FDR to force Admiral King to stop being so one-track minded about the Japanese and get his act together in the Atlantic. That decision alone probably had lasting impact on how the Allies won the war in Europe.
@smacman685 ай бұрын
There a quote in Red Storm Rising by Tom Clancy that says “amateurs think about tactics, professionals think about logistics” which is a common colloquialism in the academics of warfare. Your people know their jobs. The lower officer corp and noncommissioned officers are well trained before they even start fighting. Get them what they need is the main focus
@rachitkumar10125 ай бұрын
So happy that you brought the old intro back :)
@dynamo17965 ай бұрын
Intro absolutely slaps
@Lord_Lambert5 ай бұрын
One of your best videos yet :)
@Speedster___5 ай бұрын
Hello there
@Lord_Lambert5 ай бұрын
General @@Speedster___
@devingraves80445 ай бұрын
The shear numbers of anything WWII related never fail to blow my mind
@bigsarge20855 ай бұрын
Incredible as always, thank you!
@yanks0305 ай бұрын
Just want to say the two biggest tragedies in historical preservation is the sinking of the USS enterprise and the scrapping of the HMS Warspite Edit: my bad I thought enterprise sank during a nuclear bomb test, she was indeed scrapped. That honestly hurts even more than thinking she sank during a nuclear bomb test
@jonathanwilliams10655 ай бұрын
It’s absolutely disgusting how navy’s treated these ships Especially the British who scrapped their entire WWII navy The only commissioner vessel that survived was the Victory, which was already a centuries old museum ship
@TheIzester5 ай бұрын
in the US's historical preservation*
@flufflepuffle62295 ай бұрын
Enterprise wasn't sunk?
@FoStealth5 ай бұрын
Enterprise was scrapped. Don't you know your history?
@levipierson49465 ай бұрын
When was enterprise sunk??? Wasn't she scrapped in 59?
@rachitkumar10125 ай бұрын
The worst thing is that if you ask the Russians about how they defeated nazi Germany, almost none of them would mention the allied supplies which played such a crucial role. The Soviets would still probably have won tho albeit much much later
@sebus5595 ай бұрын
The western allies wouldn't have won the war without the Soviet Union neither, for they were paying the price in blood to wear down Germany
@BishopStars5 ай бұрын
Soviets would've been rolled without American support, especially aircraft.
@looinrims5 ай бұрын
Anyone who says that goofy stuff, just tell them how much food was sent…and then remind them how Soviets starved constantly during the war (there were even famines post war)
@dovetonsturdee70335 ай бұрын
In the words of Nakita Khrushchev after the war: "...some remarks Stalin made ... stated bluntly that if the United States had not helped us, we would not have won the war. If we had had to fight Nazi Germany one on one, we could not have stood up against Germany's pressure, and we would have lost the war." The Lend Lease provided to the USSR continued well after Germany capitulated and would not be terminated until September 20th, more than a full month after V-J Day. Of the nearly 18,000,000 tons of aid send to Russia, about 23% would be supplied via the Arctic Convoys. Escorted almost totally by the Royal and Royal Canadian Navy warships, of course.
@Cailus35425 ай бұрын
It's often forgotten that about half of the Soviet tanks defending Moscow were actually British-built Matilda's and Valentines. Just as one example.
@derrickstorm69765 ай бұрын
Man the feels when you hear those quiet cello and piano on the background of the intro
@Pooneil1984Ай бұрын
I recently found this channel. I love the graphics, pacing and neutral point of view in the narration. It makes for good storytelling. I am happy to subscribe.
@gunterthekaiser61905 ай бұрын
Had a great uncle in the Royal Canadian Navy who was a sailor aboard the destroyer HMS "chaudière" (originally called "Hero" before being handed over to the Canadians). He left very little about it in his note, beside stories of seeing whales and loving the smell of the ocean.
@geordiedog17495 ай бұрын
The BoA is often forgotten but no where near the extent that the coastal convoy war was forgotten. Please consider doing a video on the coastal war to spread the word on the RNPS.
@grandaddyoe14344 ай бұрын
Some ships which crossed the Atlantic had to fight their way dwon the UK's east coast, suffering losses. It was more than just the BoA, it was a "shipping war", worldwide.
@spartanairsoft17985 ай бұрын
Once again a fascinating, often unknown story and delivered wonderfully; keep up the awesome work.
@stogmot1Ай бұрын
ive watched and read loads on the Atlantic war ,this really explained so well the statistical side i had never seen before . Most excellent
@JHruby5 ай бұрын
Another amazing video. Terrific perspective on the fact that a war is won on the supply chain front as much as the front line.
@gundam2jimmy5 ай бұрын
Throw in U-505 being captured intact in June 1944. Currently sitting in Chicago, museum of Science and Industry.
@Cailus35425 ай бұрын
If memory serves, the British were very annoyed about that. They had captured U-boats before, but usually scuttled them at sea after removing everything of value, especially classified documents and Enigma machines. This meant that the Germans didn't know that the U-boats had been captured and their codes were compromised. I could be wrong, admittedly. Just talking from memory.
@davidforbes77725 ай бұрын
@@Cailus3542 You are correct. American arrogance and stupidity could have had serious implications if the Germans had realized that their codes were completely compromised.
@SennaAugustus5 ай бұрын
Not mentioned was the capture of U-110 by HMS Bulldog, HMS Broadway, and HMS Aubrietia, without which the naval Enigma would never have been broken. (I don't know why it's always called "the Enigma" when there are so many versions of it, the army, navy, and air force used different ones, the Italians had yet another one, not to mention backup systems such as hand ciphers, all of which had varying difficulties in cracking and often each needing capture of original documents.)
@Bullet-ve2it4 ай бұрын
I'm impressed you somehow managed to completely ignore Canada's role in the theatre.
@loneprimate4 ай бұрын
That's what the Brits always do. They're dazzled by the bad boy Yankees and get a real boner for the Aussies. Canada is forever Flo to Britain's Andy Capp.
@neilwilson57855 ай бұрын
Thanks, an excellent and concise description that I really enjoyed. The graphs and narration worked really well.
@christofmaupin202320 күн бұрын
Well done. Succinct, with a somewhat different but very well conceived interpretation of the timeline of events.
@douglassauvageau72625 ай бұрын
The P-8 Poseidon aerial-platform is a visible representation of how seriously we now regard the undersea realm. God bless that aircraft and all who fly on her.
@AmericanIdiot76595 ай бұрын
All hail the Silent Service
@bsa45acp5 ай бұрын
Excellent video overall. The issue of Liberty Ship hull cracking was due to two factors for the most part and not shoddy or hurried construction. The welding of hulls was a new technology. Riveted hulls, should a crack start, it would only propagate through the single riveted plate and not to the other plates riveted to it. Welded plates were a solid unit with the other hull plates, and a crack could therefore potentially propagate through the entire hull. The second issue was that the corners of the cargo hatches of Liberty Ships were at a 90 degree angles and this serves as a stress riser with the majority of the cracking appearing between the #3 hatch and the forward part of the house. The statistics regarding Liberty Ship hull cracking are very overblown. Most statistics regarding hull cracking and failure include cracking/failure from all causes. These statistics include all ship classes with failures due to enemy action, running aground, collisions with other ships and so forth. The simple solution during war time was to weld curved braces at the four corners of the cargo hatches. The SS Jeremiah O'Brien (Pier 35 in San Francisco) the last unaltered and fully functional Liberty Ship has such modifications. A report by the Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Homer Research Laboratory from 18 July 1997 (I have a copy in my files) shows that only three Liberty Ships actually broke in half due to the seas alone, two in heavy seas and just one in normal seas.
@dynamo17965 ай бұрын
Worth noting as well the reason they moved to welding was for speed - it was a new technology in shipbuilding but it was much much faster than riveting. The downside was that one a weld failed, the entire seam would allow the crack to propagate, riveted plates do not. On the otherside, riveted plates could buckle if overstressed and the Atlantic was the roughest ocean that the Allies operated at scale in. Ships were massively stressed by North Atlantic storms and ships being lost to the weather was not a new occurrence.
@Falcon_Lord5 ай бұрын
I love your videos! Really huge fan! I love the footage mixed with dramatic readings. If you could keep units of measurements consistent in the video that would be great! For example your losses are in tons but your new ships are counted in number. Super small comment for an amazing video 5 star
@Styphon5 ай бұрын
Back in the day we held a parade to the Battle of the Atlantic Memorial. I wish I would have known even a small fraction of the information in this video. Good job.
@atakorkut51105 ай бұрын
The German admiral Karl Dönitz who was asking for 300 U-boats by 1941 all the way back in 1935-36. he understood that the only true power projection Germany had was the U-boat concentrated on building as many as possible they could be used as a noose around the neck of Great Britain and the United States. Unfortunately, the downside of dictators that support dictators. Everyone is always battling to the important to the boss, and usually the boss has no idea what’s really going on yet the boss will always intervene in every little aspect of everything.
@alanclague23335 ай бұрын
Hardly a "Full documentary". This massively understated the UK's role and successes in the battle.
@marvinwoods45565 ай бұрын
Excellent video and narration!
@kegfreak37285 ай бұрын
Great job on this! The production level is amazing, reminds me of the old History channel content.
@peterhoare37545 ай бұрын
What a brilliant documentary. Bravo.
@Splattle1015 ай бұрын
That was a much better presentation that I expected. Well done!
@Shoehandler11425 ай бұрын
The US industrial might during world war 2 was nothing short of legendary.
@kobra63355 ай бұрын
With the US and Soviet Union on the same side, the Axis Powers never stood a chance.
@UsuallyTrolling5 ай бұрын
@@kobra6335 Don't forget the British Empire. Remember, the UK alone outproduced Germany throughout all of WW2
@mods11335 ай бұрын
One of the most shocking and underscored campaigns of the war.
@18pablo885 ай бұрын
Historiograph really is top-notch .
@sebastianbockholt83024 ай бұрын
Once again an amazing video by you. Thank you so much for all these informations
@t5ruxlee2102 ай бұрын
The key to winning the "Battle Of The Atlantic" was a remarkably simple tactic: Build enough radar/sonar equipped anti-sub combat vessels to suppress the enemy submarines waiting in front of, lurking around, and trailing behind convoys on the move. Pity the powers that be back then were so slow to grasp it while national treasuries emptied as half baked initiatives filled up Davie Jones to overflowing.
@OddLeah11 күн бұрын
The reason the Liberty ships kept breaking in half was a combination of crappy materials and crappy construction. The WTYP podcast just put out a great episode about 2 postwar Liberty ship disasters.
@greygalah5 ай бұрын
Excellent work - so interesting and fills gaps in my knowledge. I wonder if you'd look at how the USN submarines did the opposite and strangled supplies of raw materials to Japan.
@cp1cupcake5 ай бұрын
Something I remember hearing about the Liberty ships, although I have no idea if its accurate, but it was said that the ship paid for itself if it was able to make a single cross Atlantic voyage. They were probably also the most cost effective ship the US built in WW2, since many were still in use after the war, which compares sharply with the massive boneyards other things were sent to.
@alexyelado4915 ай бұрын
i hope you never stop using ryno’s theme in your videos, it fits quite well
@AndyJacklinPhotography9 күн бұрын
My late Great Uncle Wallace Garland was lost at Sea aboard HMS Fidelity during the Battle of the Atlantic. It was sunk by German U-Boat U-435.
@coyote42375 ай бұрын
Always glad to see an upload from Historigraph. Thank you for another brilliant video.
@scotthegley47233 ай бұрын
Excellent documentary, thank you!
@saturnv24195 ай бұрын
Listening this always reminds me, FDR was such a strategic genius that WWII would not have won without his strategic insight on both fronts, appointing the correct person to take overall command and intervene when needed.
@dovetonsturdee70335 ай бұрын
Like Ernie King & Dugout Doug? Think again.
@well-blazeredman61875 ай бұрын
Great video A few months ago, I did a calculation of the number ocean-convoy escorts that the Royal Navy should have ordered at the beginning of 1939. The number: 279.
@mixtape91234 ай бұрын
By the start of WW2 the US navy had 7 carriers. By the end it built 105 ranging from light carriers to massive fleet carriers
@fatalshore50684 ай бұрын
My grandfather was British navy in WW2. He served aboard the HMS Gore, an escort ship in the Atlantic.
@buffalodebill1976Ай бұрын
German attack on the east coast of the US - operation "Paukenschlag" (Drumbeat) was conducted by U-boats of type IX, not type XIV - these were the "Milchkoehe" (Milk cows), resupplying other U-boats.
@philippetremblay9065 ай бұрын
Excellent, as usual :) However, its the wrong Canada flag in the thumbnail - the current one was adopted way after WWII
@ricklyle37395 ай бұрын
Excellent content. Thanks for sharing
@rudolphaswad8723Ай бұрын
i have been entertained and educated subscription earned
@Snipurss5 ай бұрын
Excellent video. Any chance of a similar one about the US submarine campaign in the Pacific? If it doesn't already exist
@raymondtonns25215 ай бұрын
a tremendous productivity that sadly will not be seen again as WAR looms once again Asia
@Snailrider_Actual5 ай бұрын
New Historigraph? I click.
@jameszeng26665 ай бұрын
That's the good old saying: Naval Power = Power 💪
@michaelstadnikfilm5 ай бұрын
Thank you, for your great and informative work! 👍👍
@ferda98865 ай бұрын
Great timing Playing Sh3 right now😅
@ferda98865 ай бұрын
I died 20 Minuter later in 1943 attacking a big strong escorted convoy😭
@Aguygoingtowork4 ай бұрын
Can you do a story on Italy submarines in Atlantic? That would be cool to listen to
@zBernie123455 ай бұрын
Thank you for that gripping story!
@Speedster___5 ай бұрын
Would say your magnum opus but every video of yours is better then the last
@CharlieGeorge_5 ай бұрын
Oi algorithm, promote this video more, yeah?
@caioalmeida41395 ай бұрын
Jesus, what amazing, hight quality video 👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽 For sure that was, and like Ukraine War has been, a industrial war!!!
@Musashi_-815 ай бұрын
Uboats with a cameo from the Bismarck.
@ProWhitaker5 ай бұрын
Amazing, Thanks for the video
@MaxwellAerialPhotography5 ай бұрын
Would you look at that, Historiagraph managed to make yet another video about the battle of the Atlantic without once mentioning Canada or the RCN.
@Speedster___5 ай бұрын
The 3 flags in the beginning…
@geiers60135 ай бұрын
But he clearly showed them on the map at least.
@MrNicoJac5 ай бұрын
Maybe you'd have noticed he did credit them..... if you managed to pull your head out off your butthurt ass 🙃
@looinrims5 ай бұрын
…he did and it’s the same videos edited together
@UsuallyTrolling5 ай бұрын
Stop electing Justin Trudeau and you will get a shoutout
@RonaldReaganRocks15 ай бұрын
Good to see a Brit giving America the credit it deserves, as opposed to cutting us out, like many Brits do.
@dovetonsturdee70335 ай бұрын
Good to read that some Americans have a sense of humour, or at least of irony.
@DvdV13375 ай бұрын
Its hard to imagine. But the fear in the back of your mind, At all times, makes me slightly unhinged already. I wouldnt send people, but those who go are steadier than me.
@thenoworriesnomad5 ай бұрын
Excellent video....👍👍
@outofturn3315 ай бұрын
Great as usual
@donarthiazi24435 ай бұрын
Far more interesting were the _Victory_ ships that came after the _Liberty_ ships. They were larger and *over 50% faster than Liberty ships* The u-boats had a much tougher time sinking them.
@dovetonsturdee70335 ай бұрын
The first Victory ship, however, was only launched in January, 1944, and made her first voyage two months later.
@KevinOfford0133 ай бұрын
Corvettes were also built in Canada.
@nielskoester40654 ай бұрын
A fair Video for both Sides. One important Event ist Missing, the sinking of U-110 when the Allies have captured an Enigma with Code documents. That helped a lot. And an important point is, the Allied Side improved a lot the technic and Material. Germany took to long to improve the technic of the boats or even developed new boats to late. Imaging have Type XXI boats in the beginning of 1942 and new Code technic every 3 months. And have some improved homing Torpedos. After 1942 IT was bloody murder to send Out the German uboats.
@stevenweaver33865 ай бұрын
Canadian shipyards produced 122 corvettes. Being based on commercial fishing trawlers they could be built in civilian shipyards. Canadian arts also built 60 frigates for convoy duty.
@grandaddyoe14344 ай бұрын
Whalers, not trawlers.
@rob59445 ай бұрын
The Second World War was a truly monumental conflict, and epic in its proportions, both in terms of material employed, and in human cost and endeavour. It is highly doubtful if humankind will ever see its like again. Which in a way is a good thing, because for all its achievements and countless acts of bravery and fortitude, there was in equal measure, great suffering and heartache. I for one will forever be indebted to them and grateful for their sacrifice.
@looinrims5 ай бұрын
If you want to see it again, vote for pacifist politicians and just wait with the popcorn As we’ve seen what happens
@fabovondestory5 ай бұрын
"Its about to get much worse.. This video is sponsored by WoWs!"
@joechang86965 ай бұрын
sometime early in the war, Roosevelt said the US would build 6M tons of shipping a year. He pulled this number of the air because it was not an agreed upon number. This was in the newspapers. I believe this is why Doenitz thought he would have to sink 600K tons/month. The bigger matter in convoy speed was not vs. submarine submerged speed but rather surface speed, about 17-18 kt. Subs were deployed in a picket line. By mid-43?, there were escort carriers, forcing subs to submerge in daylight if a convoy was near. Once spotted, it would have to race ahead, and wait for others to join for a wolf pack attack. The convoy sails at 10-11kt continuously. The submarine can only be on the surface during the night, which is very short in the summer.
@dovetonsturdee70335 ай бұрын
Doenitz actually based his 600,000 tons per month on the calculations of Admiral von Holtzendorff, the Chief of Staff of the Imperial German Navy for much of WW1.
@davefellhoelter13435 ай бұрын
Gramps was PBY's EWO, couple buddies Merchies Atlantic and Pacific both sunk, one in both the Atlantic and Pacific, brothers father in law was N Atlantic, Atlantic, and Battle of Britian as an American jioned the RCAF, then RAF, ended USAAC, maybe coupe other allies mixed in? and the french.
@ltdom5 ай бұрын
American ship printer go brrrrrrr lmao
@Naddycone45 ай бұрын
i also noticed that lmao, it was a nice way to define what the American Factory was like during WW2, a printer.
@Fallen_Arrow5 ай бұрын
love your videos man!
@Etropalker5 ай бұрын
‘The only thing that ever really frightened me during the war was the U-boat peril.’ - Winston Churchill, The Second World War, Volume 2. I think i agree with his assessment, the time after the fall of france, and right after the us joined were probably the closest they ever got to knocking britain out. I truly appreciate all those who prevented that, i really do enjoy this democracy im living in.(even if a few too many war criminals were let go a little too intentionally)
@nickgooderham23895 ай бұрын
At 4:26 HMCS Regina in RCN colour scheme. As usual practically no information given on RCN involvement, which was massive! By 1943 two thirds of all convoys on the North Atlantic route were escorted by the RCN. By the end of the war Canada had the third largest navy in the world.
@historigraph5 ай бұрын
I used ‘Allied’ throughout for a reason
@joenerad33285 ай бұрын
@@historigraph But you mentioned the U.S. I guess they only deserve a separate mention even though they were also allies
@andreslinares64295 ай бұрын
One question for the Soviet lovers. How many U-Boats did the Red Navy sink ?
@dovetonsturdee70335 ай бұрын
Seven in total, though some were by shore batteries.
@grandaddyoe14344 ай бұрын
What were USSR's shipping losses in WW2. They were only in the war for four years . . .
@jeremydale4548Ай бұрын
Pretty sure they were in the war for the whole time? Could be wrong though
@admiralcapn5 ай бұрын
25:19 - tables got turned so hard that a US carrier captured, boarded, and towed a German U-boat back to home soil. Check out Codename Nemo.
@UsuallyTrolling5 ай бұрын
HMS Bulldog did it first by capturing an enigma machine from U-110 in 1941
@robertmiller2173Ай бұрын
This is the first time that I have heard that the Liberty Ship being a Pomie Design!
@Theninja07-ie9bh5 ай бұрын
Great video love your content man
@chrismikkelsen93015 ай бұрын
I live in Thunder Bay and during WW2 the Port Arthur Shipbuilding Co. was one of the builders of the Flower Class Corvettes during the war which I thought was disopointing that Thunder Bay/Canada was not mensoned of them building warships as well
@theemporersnewclothes5 ай бұрын
Good content 👌
@robertsansone16805 ай бұрын
Excellent! So very excellent. Thank You
@grandaddyoe14344 ай бұрын
Admiral King wasn't slow to organise; he was incompetent. An Anglophobe, he took no heed of advice from experienced Royal Navy officers.
@sproge21425 ай бұрын
@historigraph do you know what the UK shipping capacity was before the war? It would help to show how long the UK would have been able to sustain the losses they were taking. Thanks!