Wireless HDMI Is Here! Say Goodbye To HDMI Cables! | BMOSTE Wireless HDMI Transmitter Receiver Kit

[@DaveBjornRapp]

These have been around for a couple years, but they weren't as easy to use when they first came out. They've come a long way.

[@JohnSnow-vf8jo]

As much as I love the concept, when I see the price of these things, it's going to be cable all the way.

[@victororo462]

Yup! 70 bucks for a 5 dollar cable...lol.

[@buddybleeyes]

I'm surprised you didn't try and use a latency monitor of some kind. Products like these tend to add alot of latency

[@OldDirtyRobot]

Right, whether it works isnt the issue.

[@reggaerock]

Yeah I'm fairly certain there is some bad latency and it's the reason I haven't crossed over. If it's minimal I suppose I would

[@shiion6711]

Errr no there’s almost no latency as people already tested the latency like 2 years ago…

[@buddybleeyes]

@shiion6711 what are you on mate? 🤣🤣

[@SrUnr3al]

@@shiion6711 what is the number? i've seen people game on TVs without game mode on 80ms delay and say "its fine", i´m a PC gamer used to play on 6-8ms input lag total, anything above 20ms is unplayable for me.

[@michelfortin7055]

I would never downgrade to HD from 4K just to go wireless. But I can see a market for this.

[@GDBAKED81]

I can see this being useful if you're console is upstairs and you don't want to keep moving it downstairs to a better TV

[@iamfreeareyou681]

Wireless controllers don't work that far away and aren't meant to work properly through walls and floors.. This is intended for devices that are in the same room, so you don't need the wire. You wouldn't leave your cellphone upstairs to play music downstairs on a bluetooth stereo, you'd bring your phone with you. Same idea, different concept.

[@itsmznatnatbitchez]

I have way too many TV's in my house I cannot afford $119 USD just for ONE set of these. And the Amazon reviews state that the transmitters randomly stop working. This video SHOULD highlight the good and the bad about these. Making it seem like wireless HDMI is the future when people spend so much on these and they stop working..... That's not a cost most are willing to make. These HDMI wireless receivers are NOT reliable. Please make a video to add to this one to clarify. The Amazon reviews speak for themselves.

[@TonyHA913]

You are right, although the technology is great this device would only work if you game console / streaming console or PC are basically in the same room as your tv otherwise how would you be able to control your xbox/PC from a different room or floor. It would also be useful to try and have the tv in a different room or different floor in the house and see how reliable it is, but again you will need some something to transmit your controller signal at the same time. I think it is a premium price just to avoid having your console under your tv. There are other devices that can also transmit USB signal so those could be useful for PCs if the wifi connection is reliable over some kind of distance.

[@noblesseoblige319]

to be fair, don't you get two?

[@yasirrakhurrafat1142]

​@@noblesseoblige319 bruh.. you'll need both just to attach one display, other one will attach to the pc or the console. One on the monitor/tv other on the pc/console. Got it?

[@noblesseoblige319]

@@yasirrakhurrafat1142 no, not at all what I mean. You need one transmitter and one receiver. The pack comes with TWO receivers. Your pc being able to project to two different tvs. Or... At least that's what the link WAS going to. It was going to a pack from that company with two two receivers and one transmitter. If you go to that company's store on Amazon, however, they don't actually have that pack marketed there. You had to search manually for it. The one they did advertise was what the video showed: one of each. But the link was to the pack. But both yesterday and today the link goes to the non-pack one. I have literally no idea why the seller altered the product, but they did for some reason (the old one is still in my Amazon cart, because I thought I misremembered or somethin. But nope. It's the same link, but if you didn't buy or put the pack in your cart when it was there, you can only get the non pack version).

[@Kanoog]

EVERYTHING stops working, it's technology. Who says they just didn't have a shitty model. I've had a TCL Tv die on me after a few years while others have used them for a extremely long time. That doesn't mean they are bad TVS I just got unlucky. Same with PS5 controllers, I never HAD drift and I got it at release while others did.

[@JSGilbert]

The tech has been around for a while. I’ve actually used a 4k version to receive picture to a switcher.

[@Chico38able]

Link pls

[@TobiasKryze]

How was the 4k one?

[@dustinsanders0788]

I have gotten the Nyrius Aries pro in 2019 and it was over 200 usd. I still have it and it works great still. I may think about getting something like this soon much cheaper and easier to transport

[@IrisXie-x9s]

RGBlink Ask Nano wireless HDMI transimtter and Receiver is cool and affordable price $101.9 , available in AMZN

[@BMOSTE]

Thank you for sharing, Bmoste’s Black Friday sale is underway! The lowest price of the year! Enjoy the convenience of wireless life now!

[@breemiumtechnologyhub]

absolutely amazing! It's incredible to see how technology continues to evolve and push the limits in this modern era. thumbs-up to the inventor for showcasing such innovative tech advancements! Awesome 👍❤️

[@DukeBX]

I've never seen so many wires for something that's wireless.

[@jcalzada74]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@Kanoog]

Tell me, how many wires do you see from the system that runs to the TV.

[@Alexanderbuilds2001]

I’m fine with cables

[@mikexc90]

we had video senders in the 80s so if these have just come out they was a long time

[@tessie4204]

This is good to stream Movies and Steam from your PC to the big TV.

[@andrewuk8363]

Now us aliens only need wireless electricity around the home!

[@OfficialChaseBrogan]

There you go that's an idea haha

[@TheLegendryZelda]

Solar is considered wireless electricity XD

[@teamcyrmining3673]

Does this work with HDMI ARC? Does it send the audio back to the AVR? Does it turn the AVR on and off when the TV is turned on and off? Does it allow control of AVR sound using your TV remote?

[@henriberry01]

Would love to know this as well.

[@wiltonsmith6248]

Same. I highly doubt it

[@deadlyraver4454]

nice. Of course my first two questions are 1: Does it lag and 2: What is the range you can put between transmitter and receiver? With luck this could indeed be a game changer. I don't like that it takes up a USB port, but we'll see if that's negotiable or not when compared to the advantages it gives.

[@carlylechen5505]

1. Compared with wireless screencasting through screencast, this solution definitely has lower latency and can even achieve real-time transmission. 2. The brand now has several devices with marked transmission distances ranging from 98ft to 820ft. It also has two options: 1080P 60HZ and 4K 30HZ.

[@deadlyraver4454]

@@carlylechen5505 DAMN!! 820ft? That'll definitely cover your average house with more than a little room to spare. Thanks for the info.

[@carlylechen5505]

Please note that according to them, passing through walls will attenuate the signal transmission distance. I purchased their 4K option on Amazon and no issues so far.@@deadlyraver4454

[@kadeschs]

820 ft. doesn’t account going through walls.

[@purehoops22]

Bought this a couple days ago because of your video and even used your affiliate link. Hooked it up to my PS5 and it is giving nothing but lag and glitchy gameplay. Any solutions? I really want this to work! Thanks in advance.

[@somebody69747]

I mean a wired solution will always be more stable and faster. Just like in charging. You can charge wireless but it's much faster to charge wired.

[@purehoops22]

So no solution lol. Good thing I returned this already@@somebody69747

[@esecallum]

not suitable for hgames

[@THA-REAPER]

Set the console to 1080p? Without using it at all…My guess if it’s set to output 4k it may let you see and hear, but the hardware probably can’t transmit that much bandwidth, or your isp, routor etc. Theoretically wouldn’t it be pulling bandwidth twice as much. Also I wonder if the picture quality varies with speed or it’s like max output the whole time.

[@iamfreeareyou681]

Clearly it isn't meant for gaming. It's probably only meant for a computer, to watch movies and tv shows.

[@rattlejuggalo13]

I've been using wireless HDMI for over 5 years now. The one I had even had a built in IR repeater and USB port for controlling a PC As for multiple devices, That's where an External HDMI Switch come in handy. Some even have a HDMI Port on the front.

[@jeffm9227]

Can you use more than one receiver for the same transmitter? I have a security NVR I want to send to multiple TVs throughout my house.

[@iamfreeareyou681]

This is meant for devices in the same room, not devices all over your house.

[@turtleplates]

what if you have multiple in the same area ? multiple monitors? can you mirror or independent?

[@FrankSlattery]

Wireless HDMI HAS been here.... I've been deploying solutions like this for a number of reasons for ages. IOGear makes a number of excellent wireless HDMI products that I've been using since 2015. With that said wired will always be superior and you'll never convince me otherwise. This will work but it wouldn't really push the limits of my NZ7.

[@OfficialChaseBrogan]

Agreed. I've tested several in the past but had crappy results. I'm not trying to convince you otherwise. Cables are $5-$20...this is 5x that. Eventually prices will come down though and then it could have more of an impact.

[@basuyarbrough5365]

I was thinking about getting a new HDMI cord. In fact I just ordered one randomly enough I KZbin wireless HDMI and this video popped up and I happen to have an Xbox as well😂

[@TheAbsol7448]

If they make one with a small USB-C transmitter, I'll buy one. That would be _so good_ for DS/3DS/Wii U emulation. You could use an Android handheld or a Steam Deck as the bottom screen and your TV as the top screen.

[@IrisXie-x9s]

RGBlink 4K Wireless HDMI Transmitter and Receiver Kit USB-C can slove your problem and will available in Amazon soon

[@eduardomoraes8237]

its 1080p nobody used that resolution anymore and its $120 ... its a downgrade from cdmi cable don't recommend

[@IrisXie-x9s]

RGBlink Ask Nano wireless HDMI transimtter and Receiver is cool and affordable price $101.9 , available in AMZN

[@m3l3e]

Although this wouldn't work for competitive gaming or maybe even fps it's still great for some casual gaming

[@OfficialChaseBrogan]

agreed

[@JohnCrockett88]

Most gamers enjoy a multi screen set up and not all USB's on all TVs charge HDMI devices. I learnt that with the Google Chrome issues I had a few years ago.

[@BMOSTE]

Yes, you're right. Our device requires only 5v 1a to power

[@parsabbaluca21]

this is a good idea if your planning on installing a flip down monitor in your vehicle...no need to run a hdmi cable inside your vehicle.

[@johnwhorfin5150]

would have liked to see the range and you should have picked a better game to test lag

[@iamfreeareyou681]

I'd rather have the wire than deal with the latency over wireless. Latency is fine when it comes to internet, but even that is practically non existent compared to latency from bluetooth and other wireless devices. I like to hit play and have it start playing instantly on the other end. If I'm playing music I don't want to wait even a second for the music to kick in after I've hit play. And this has to do video and audio, so the latency will be worse.

[@bologlor]

There are literally more wires then before.

[@noblesseoblige319]

It's here? It's been here for almost a decade. Hell, I still have my $30 one from 2017. Don't get me wrong, it wasn't plug-and-play and obviously not super reliable (it was incredibly cheap), but still. It's been a thing for a while.

[@ShadowBoss0001]

Still limited to the tv requirements like if you have 2 HDMI ports you can only use 2 HDMI wireless receiver but i love that idea to be completely wireless depending on how much it cost

[@PB-tc6hw]

Just for the sake of precision, your HDMI ports on your TV are not outputs, they’re inputs. If you happen to have output (especially on AV receiver), don’t plug that receiver dongle in it, it won’t give the expected results…

[@Spitflies]

Amazon listing states 0.1 seconds of latency, aka 100 milliseconds, thats alot for gaming.

[@mtibbe]

If people using a fire tv stick to watch tv I could see where these could be an issue because you would be fighting for the usb port on the tv. Also if you had multiple hdmi devices hooked to one tv you would need a usb splitter in order to power up multiple of these. If they could come up with a way where these wireless HDMI transmitters could be powered directly by the HDMI ports making them truly wireless I would be more apt to buy them

[@garystinten9339]

2:29 nice way to say mum and dad.

[@philip5899]

How many times does he say “I’m going to go ahead and” ? Just say “I’m going to” 😂

[@kevinhanley6462]

No lag whatsoever! Even if the cable is too long, it adds latency to games. I wonder how well it'd perform some distance away.

[@MaximusTheChosenOne]

Not true

[@jimmyryan5880]

​@@MaximusTheChosenOne it's true, physics is physics

[@jimmyboy2778]

@@jimmyryan5880 yes. cable adds like 0,00000000000001 ms more if its longer.

[@BMOSTE]

Thank you for testing😀

[@DreamerSouls]

The main reason why I would want something like this is to make 3DS and Wii U emulation on a steam deck a better experience since you can split the top screen and bottom screen on those emulators and having to use a wire to display to keep that working is kind of irritating

[@Richard500]

Nice, but at a £129 for the kit in the UK I think I will stick to my trusty cable!

[@TerkelNL]

if they have a HDMI 2.1 version would nice so you can use it on PS5 and still get the 4K 120FPS HDR

[@kiaradavis5852]

The vices should have this technology and featured built into them, so we wouldn’t even have to use a external device that we have to purchase

[@JoeyRam.]

Looks like for every system (PS, DVD, etc.) one need a receiver and transmitter and with each, an HDMI port available in the TV. Now goes the question: Is the signal the same? If it is, then only one receiver on the TV and the rest of the devices with their respective transmitters. If not, please test this: On one TV port an HDMI switcher full of receivers. That HAS to work.

[@VintageForYou]

what is the max distance range from HDMI to HDMI in feet.

[@iamfreeareyou681]

The range for bluetooth is around 33 feet, and the range for wifi is about 150 feet. This is less through walls and floors, maybe one third. Assume the range is only within the confines of a single room.

[@RyanCua]

Curious if you have more than one of these connected at home, same display or separate displays within the transmitting and receiving range if there’s going to be any signal distortion or connection issues…

[@KevinMillard68]

so now you need 2 ports 1 for the adapter and 1 for the power from your computer this is usless and takes a a port you might need but now you lose your port i guess its better then rechageable units that would cause alot of ewaste but other wise i think iam going to stick with a cable that i never have to replace and i keep my ports free for what i need them for ..

[@jedijoe1089]

why are we still using hdmi cables because its hell of alot cheaper than using wireless hdmi which is priced at abit over 100 american dollars.good vid m8t i would wait till it comes down in price.

[@reggaerock]

I don't see it being an advantage. Yeah you can leave the wireless one in the tv and change out the other end to any system or device, but you can do the same with a wired one with less latency and no USB. I DO hate wires, but untile latency is PROVEN to be a non-factor (especially with 4K and up) I'll have to stick with wires

[@Kanoog]

You are only looking at the SMALL picture. For people who have lets say a projector on the ceiling from a computer in the other room, it's insanely good.

[@dalebenton3354]

how much do these cost,Could do with these on both my Computers and all my games consoles as well

[@daringendrek6074]

120 bucks on Amazon

[@LilHoodRatHorsey]

this is good but if you are playing FPS game you might want to use regular HDMI or Display Port due to no input lag but this product is cool.

[@christianpiedra7393]

I think it's an excellent technology. Now we have to wait for them to perfect it in 4k technology and the most important thing is that the price is within everyone's reach

[@OfficialChaseBrogan]

For sure definitely agree. Like how flat screen tvs were super expensive out of the gate ... it just takes time for prices to come down.

[@reggaerock]

The most important thing is latency

[@truthnow902]

I like that but I only have 2 USB ports on my TV so I can only use 2 that sucks!!!

[@neddy1287]

Only catch is transferring the transmission device to other devices is a big no for me as it not convenient enough unless you have a wireless remote control to switch between devices on the fly without having to remove it this would be more ideal reducing the risk of breaking the hdmi port and usb c port. That my honest opinion

[@michaelwyckoff7593]

Roku 4K stick works just like this😊

[@silverlanswoodworking]

sounds like there's a heavy delay between inputs and display click click click than kick

[@casekocsk]

That's what I'm afraid too... Wireless stuff always has worse delay/latency, ALWAYS. I watched the video again in 0.5x speed, and it is clear that there is huge delay between he pressing something on the controller and the player character actually move on screen. Since I don't play that game, I don't know if that is how the game works... Or the wireless HDMI has that much of a delay (which is almost unusable for fast paced game like helldivers or COD or alike).

[@1carmendr]

Will Roku use this at some point? This is cool 🙂

[@shayanshahriar7882]

Have you tested from a different room?

[@the-papaw]

Unless I missed it, this is only 1080 @60htz max, FYI

[@MrRepsie]

I prefer a hdmi 2.1 switch with a remote control. Is much better than switching that stick from device to device

[@AraceaeFanatics]

Wireless HDMI products have existed for over 10 years already. They weren't perfect, but we used one for many years.

[@Natsu01]

I thought the point was to have less cables & Yet you have a cable for each device lmao 🤣 😂

[@Thomas-VA]

well hopefully for tight spaces an L hdmi adapter can be used since the those seem pretty long

[@PrimalRage-om8uz]

that's awesome... thanks for the review... 👍👍👍👍👍

[@OfficialChaseBrogan]

Thanks for watching!

[@balloftitanium3961]

Now I can put my pc to my store room, and my monitor to my bedroom, to have more space.

[@dustup2249]

This is a great new gadget, but the 100mSec latency will be noticeable in FPS titles. The fact that there was no screen tear or hiccups in your demo is promising tho. I have to wonder if a WiFi 6E version (if there is such a device) plugged into a HDMI 2.1 capable console and 4K/120Hz gaming monitor would have less latency...

[@edwinlopez8316]

What are the refresh rates you were able to get out of it?

[@Tennophobia1]

60HZ

[@martinj7032]

Brilliant!!! So you get rid of one cable and replace it with 2 - the extender to the usb cables. That's what I call real genius. Yet again, another product that solves a problem nobody has ever had. 🤣🤣

[@lonnielove01]

Nowadays computer display manufactures should already have this built in, and should use the Bluetooth connectivity, I work from home and I use 3 monitors, so this will not work for me. Good vid though.

[@Tracer414]

I have two questions. I do presentations using my laptop to a digital projector. Sometimes a projector is 100 ft away. Do you know what the distance the signal will be sent from transmitter to receiver? Finally, with this device work on say a DirecTV box where we normally have to use HDMI to our TV? Thanks

[@carlylechen5505]

If there is no obstruction in the environment, the device claims that the transmission distance can reach 98 feet, but I still recommend that you use the equipment in his store with longer distances, which generally can get a more stable experience.

[@sangeetsargamsagar4639]

best for projectors! Hope it supports ARC for audio

[@BMOSTE]

Sorry, our devices currently do not support ARC, and we will work hard to develop and add this feature.

[@jeffreybower5959]

wireless hdmi!?? of course they are over $100,, and this could help eliminate ALLL my hdmi cables to my tv using the cable box, dvd player, and all 3 of my xbox consoles,, original xbox, xbox 360 and xbox one x!!

[@quinnreiswig-vc3cy]

Truly excellent news

[@TronixGuy93]

Now spies can just recieve your video signal. Brilliant. As if parallel sandbox monitoring wasn't easy enough to bypass any type of encryption or password.

[@arongatt]

Is that Marylin Manson’s face by the tv ?

[@OfficialChaseBrogan]

Yeah it is

[@arongatt]

@@OfficialChaseBrogancool

[@CD-vb9fi]

If you don't understand why we still use cables then you just don't understand physics enough. Wires keep information well encapsulated an insulated from interference and eavesdropping. If you want to see what I mean... plug up 3 or 4 of these devices in the same house along with Wifi, 4 or 5 bluetooth devices and 3 to 4 nearby wifi networks in range. Air is just like a wire and it has "bandwidth limits" based on the technology being used. And just like 500 people in a room on loud speakers... You will find out pretty fast why "wires" are still necessary.

[@DV-tc1yr]

ok if your in the same room, i doubt it will tx to the rx very well through walls and how far is the question

[@jason.martin]

Wow great review! so this is just plug and play and your good to go then?

[@IrisXie-x9s]

RGBlink Ask Nano wireless HDMI transimtter and Receiver is cool and affordable price $101.9 , available in AMZN

[@lowkey3820]

It’s definitely not doing 4k@120FPS so I guess I gotta stay wired

[@nr3157]

Interesting, but it will cost about 120 dollars for each HDMI cable I would be replacing with this gadget, unless I unplug the receiver and transmitter each time I want to use a different device, which makes no sense. Also, there's the possible lag as has been reported here, so that's ok I will stay with my HDMI cables.

[@roninstormYT]

well yea cable connections are better than wireless connections see in you dont play shooters or fighting games we that do i need all the advantage i can go against your friends in few halo matches or tekken 8 or street fighter 6 matches online . do it who will come out on top the guy that is wired just like how i use my xbox controller hard wired cause the controller has 3 modes with batteries without batteries or just hard usb wired . shock not many people know about that with the xbox controllers you able too do that with the 360 wireless if you had the play and charge kit it works without batteries

[@mark_r49]

Wireless transmitter/receiver has a lot of wires and adapters!!

[@strizay]

too bad you couldn't use multiple transmitters with one receiver and use a remote to switch between them. If you have 3 or 4 HDMI devices, you would need to buy a set for each, and I doubt they would all fit due to the size. And where would you find 3 or 4 usb ports for each receiver? It's a good start, but it needs these features to be the best.

[@Mikeyd3909]

can i use this on the back of the firecube for the transmitter, and the other one in the TV for receiver -- october 2024

[@pas4t4]

Something similar could be good for some Vr models.

[@jasonthrush4598]

Only problem most some monitors don't have usb or C charging ports so what do you do if you only have hdmi and power cable ??

[@user-mfsc-2024]

grab a usb power charger

[@IrisXie-x9s]

RGBlink Ask Nano wireless HDMI transimtter and Receiver is cool and affordable price $101.9 , available in AMZN

[@silvertiger1324]

🤔 For a game console I can see this being overkill since consoles I have are stored right at the tv. But I have a gaming laptop that I have to use a 25ft hdmi cable if I want to cast to my tv. I've used the windows "cast" and samsung's "east connection" programs, but there is too much delay in the games. I am curious if this will work without noticeable delay. 😎

[@ceasarstudioceasarbelliard7873]

Nice ! but I will stick to Cables. No Set up, No extra power, No Lag and 100% reliable.

[@garystinten9339]

Are there settings available for the dongles?? Mine has a web based settinge screen and also have updating feature within the settings page.

[@atomotron]

This is all fun and dandy, but what about the latency? I don't believe it can be instant, there should be some latency, the only question is - how much?

[@IrisXie-x9s]

RGBlink 4K Wireless HDMI Transmitter and Receiver Kit,Plug and Play,Wireless HDMI Extender One Transmitter and Two Receivers, Supports PC and Mobile Phones for Meetings Live Broadcasts is available in AMZ now.

[@Mike-sp7zv]

Ordered The steam deck & Docking station. This is next.

[@chrisskinner6483]

Don't. It's 1080p. And will not do Dolby or the like. 100ms latency.

[@Mike-sp7zv]

@@chrisskinner6483 what would you recommend?

[@hustle2muscle]

They should do this with Ethernet cables!

[@OfficialChaseBrogan]

💀💀💀

[@jdubxi11]

Yeah, that's called wi-fi...

[@egwok1]

Just wow the only thing I see wrong with this since it’s wireless using it might interfere by other devices in the house. And break the signal maybe I’m wrong .

[@larryjasper9721]

amazon has a bunch of reviews saying for movies it gets super hot and lags a lot.

[@garylove2836]

That’s a good idea.

[@VanitaTailor-u7s]

Hi as I don't use games can i use just the tv device only to watch tv please

[@Evo187]

how is the performance with multiple of these.. and if you got multiple you need a usb hub on your tv on top so yeah idk for now

[@johnlemuelm.santiago6036]

Now they need a wireless power cord