Obviously this is so much more complex, but I am struck by how similar this is to an airline training session in a full motion simulator.
@HazeGreyAndUnderway4 жыл бұрын
From my understanding the Shuttle was purposely designed this way with the thought being it's basically a giant boxcar with wings so the surroundings and configuration of seats would be a familiar leap for the crews since most personnel come from a flying background anyway. If it quacks like a duck and walks like a duck, it'll probably fly like a duck too.
@tomking18908 ай бұрын
19 degree decent.
@pilotboy2176 ай бұрын
That's because they are in a simulator 😂
@Bluenoser61314 жыл бұрын
NASA is really stepping up with the videos for the last few flights. Thanks to the crew for putting up with the cameras!
@skyprop12 жыл бұрын
Mike Finke My hometown boy....Very proud of him. Go mike
@SnottyAust13 жыл бұрын
Incredible flame out approach ! loved it
@francescopaolociminale52584 жыл бұрын
My God ....you have to be very careful how you move ....you don’t want inadvertently touch any buttons.....I am on the bed and I feel anxious for them... God bless you guys....I wish Mother Nature could have been more generous with my Q.I. . ,
@pablogomez13433 ай бұрын
That is just amazing.
@Dra7415 жыл бұрын
Kelly is no doubt a hero
@macieksoft7 жыл бұрын
Now, after death of Shuttle program they could make their sims available to public. Why not? Or even better, make the flight software open source and publish GPC emulator code if they managed to emulate it (not sure if in this sim they used actual GPCs or emulated ones).
@macieksoft Жыл бұрын
@and321now They have released assembler source code for multiple variants of AGC software. We now have both AGC and AGS fully emulated running real software in simulator. So why not go for it with Space Shuttle?
@CarlBrainerd10 ай бұрын
The Shuttle Mission Simulators, one of which is in this video, used actual GPCs with the real flight software. Late in the program a software emulation of the GPCs was developed for use during engineering development and checkout, but the crew training always used the real ones.
@skyprop12 жыл бұрын
A great flight engineer
@oakmonster21643 жыл бұрын
Y'all have this in a museum now?
@KFieLdGaming7 жыл бұрын
What abort condition did they face here? Was this a single engine out after they passed through max-q, giving them an RTLS scenario once the SRBs separated? Hard to follow exactly what happened. I know that NASA is quite happy they never had to go through an RTLS because the forces exerted on the shuttle were borderline, and it was highly possible the shuttle would have broken up, even in the upper atmosphere. Performing an RTLS was certainly no guarantee. I saw the master alarm light come on a few times, where Mark punched it off. I always thought for some reason that the alarm would be audible in the cabin, but I guess it's only audible in their flight headsets.
@lorenzopappatico6 жыл бұрын
As far as I know, the Master Alarm is audible in the cabin. Maybe it isn't in the sim, but there's a video of STS-65 re-entry from on board, and there you could hear the alarm going off a couple of times
@necox514 жыл бұрын
Nice! More videos like this! :D
@macieksoft7 жыл бұрын
Silly question. Did they ever got RANGE SAFE ARM light lit up in a sim? Are there any procedures for such situation. I know it wouldn't normally happen anyway. But if theres a light there must be some procedures.
@VIR09213 жыл бұрын
Perfect landing, he was right on those speeds like flies on sugar.
@piecrust814 жыл бұрын
Wow! Another great video. :D
@cbsk34114 жыл бұрын
On February the 10, about 2:50 PM, a group of jets passed overhead, a bit north of Lake Olympia Parkway in Missouri City. I got a couple of pictures, and I'm pretty sure the planes are NASA T-38s. Was this an Astronaut training flight?
@tomking18908 ай бұрын
No, they did that in G 2's.
@UD503J6 ай бұрын
@@tomking1890 That was the Shuttle Training Aircraft which simulated landings. The astronauts/astronaut candidates routinely flew in T-38s both to stay current in flight hours (for active duty military officers) and adaptation training for the civilian scientist and mission specialists. There's a block of reserved airspace in the Gulf of Mexico (mainly MOAs out of Eglin AFB in Florida) that were typically used for the T-38 flights. They usually operated out of Ellington Field just outside of Houston.
@1Nekit114 жыл бұрын
@mikafan1003 HUD is used for fuel tanks, engine fuel receiving, lights, electricity and some other stuff like that.
@subhojithalder60174 жыл бұрын
man .. now thats rocket science people talk about
@LuckyPikinini4 жыл бұрын
ID RATHER BE IN HERE THAN BE IN THE COLUMBIA OR CHALLENGER
@fred369569 ай бұрын
Without getting in to details BOTH disasters were 100% preventable. Chris Kraft stated in an interview that it wasn't the fallacy of the machine but the fallacy of the human brain. In other words what caused both disasters were decisions made by NASA Management (and Contractor for Challenger) in not stopping flights until BOTH very well known issues were FIXED.
@SquealerDealer5 ай бұрын
Mr. Vice President
@technowarriorstv7 ай бұрын
Guess I'm playing ksp all night again
@PeterBacon7 ай бұрын
On a channel full of fluff this is definitely solid.
@jacklanard74654 жыл бұрын
All i see is math😰😰😰
@pilotboy2176 ай бұрын
135 shuttle missions and more rockets launches but I cant run open headers on my car. These fools forget who gives them money to go to space.
@101southsideboy Жыл бұрын
mark was taken off the mission for a while after his wife a US senator or congresswoman from az was shot
@1Nekit114 жыл бұрын
STS-134...
@adamrosales36179 ай бұрын
i mkss it
@auc70238 жыл бұрын
i like
@karenhilker80742 жыл бұрын
One question: how much are these people paid?
@fred369569 ай бұрын
Not nearly as much as they should for their many many hours of training, skills and their high intelligence as well as facing the dangers of riding a winged spacecraft in to Earth orbit and then experiencing the very, very extreme temperatures of re-entry in to the Earth’s atmosphere and gliding (without a second chance to land) on a very precise target: a 15,000, 300 foot runway in the middle of a swamp like environment with alligators having to be scared off the runway by helicopters prior to the scheduled landing.