Some youtubers and agents are so naive that they thought no problems for resell their flats. Didn't reveal the Real risk when developer gone bankrupt and the land as collateral to the bank.. Then all private contracts on top of its land would be revoited.
Majority of the cases occurred in the contract law instead of land law... In the land law, when a completed property with title transfers to an individual theoretically the ownership rights being protected by NLC.
This will be a nightmare for those who bought unfortunately. In order to tell whether a project is any good in malaysia just looking at the banks who are willing to finance the project. Are majority of the big local banks like Maybank, Public Bank or RHB bank financing the project? Nope. Only Kuwait Finance House financing the project as far as I know. What does that tell you? Secondly there is no individual exit plan unless somehow, miraculously some consortium decide to buy over the entire building. Coz no sane person or bank is going to finance the sale of individual "hotel rooms" which you have no control over. As for rent, there is alot of new hotels sprouting out and there is no guarantee of your unit being rented out consistently. And not forgetting you will have to pay gor refurbishment cost every 5 years even if your unit is under utilised.
@standin.excaliblur751011 күн бұрын
i am not a property guy but the term of individual "hotel rooms" sounds nonsense for me even when it came out many years ago back then
@WeiGe-888815 күн бұрын
*很有意思啊。💓*
@rabbiter-v8b15 күн бұрын
看新闻发现还是两国大集团项目,租与买都不由买家做主,他们只是租了99年的租客。
@elviek306013 күн бұрын
請問是哪兩大集團?
@EasyProj14 күн бұрын
新山富力公主湾是Freehold契约吗?
@rentthaiamulet14 күн бұрын
@@EasyProj 不懂,但是看地段就可以知道应该不是咯...
@f12334040514 күн бұрын
買海外房產 除非是自己會入住 否則改投資美債ETF 還比較實在
@maozi24435 күн бұрын
最近王局采访的野夫大眼别墅案,似乎也是类似的合同 …… 只是那个发生在泰国。
@eastman00014 күн бұрын
主编,是那一个建商发了PLS或是那一些房產
@goochchuang15 күн бұрын
所以這是一支八分鐘長的廣告?
@NanohaYagami15 күн бұрын
避雷宣傳
@akasomot976214 күн бұрын
如果你看完還覺得這房產吸引... 你去買吧
@goochchuang14 күн бұрын
@@akasomot9762拜託你看到最後好嗎
@zerolimit603014 күн бұрын
This is indirectly promoting their team ..as agent
Not saying it is very good project or bad, but below is my assessment that you should consider as buyer for due diligence. No full details of the site plan, interior furnishing, no show unit sample, can only view from brochure and assume with imaginations. Also the walking distance to new RTS is quite a distance (no traffic light) and walking to shopping area has no traffic lights for pedestrians. It’s a safety risk. Positioning itself close to banks is useless to leisure travellers who is looking for reasonable room rate. Being close to business offices is subjective, business traveler don’t rent big units, they just need a place to rest and usually around 12sqm. Unless the management is able to work out deals with surrounding companies on standing agreement for corporate rental for long duration service apartments rental to improve its revpar and room occupancy rate, otherwise I don’t see high chance for consistent good yield. But there is no details on how the management going to ensure occupation rate to be above 80% “for your unit”. This has not taken into considerations there are other nearby hotels/service apartment to compete against the occupancy rate; all fighting for the customers. Year 6 onward returns are based on projections with 70/30% profit sharing. Total yearly returns yet to minus away maintenance fees, taxes and other fees. Please note that fees increases on yearly basis, any figures quoted by agent is subjective to yearly inflations and other factors. Also service apartments is easy to buy, difficult to sell in future because yield may drop. 20 years of locked-in to management is also a risk, no rental = no yield. While it is convenient for a management team to help you manage the rental, you can also be locked in to constant loss or break even as “you have no control of your unit for 20 years”. There is also no mention of furnishings renewal or updates during the first 20 years. It could be the same piece from day 1 to year 20. It could be at the point of the unit hand over on year 20, you could potentially see broken furnitures, toilet and kitchenette. The most concerning part is building maintenance, most are not built to last and there is no details on maintenance plans. Other potential risk is building/property infront of the reclaimed land at cheaper price or blocking the view . Please do your own due diligence for investment as you may also end up losing money. Even if you break-even at year 20, it is as good as never invest in the first place when your money can be channeled to other valuable investments. Don't forget, you are also paying high interest rate for the monthly loan repayment. Other factors include forex risk if you are investing as a foreigner and their currency strengthen overtime (which i guess likely not.)