Get in the game! 🎾 Subscribe to TennisTV now using my EXCLUSIVE link: tnn.is/wivornproductions Don't forget to DROP A LIKE and Subscribe for more Original Tennis content! 🎥
@breathbadminton2 күн бұрын
Injuries, inconsistency, and off-court distractions often held him back from reaching the heights he was capable of. It's easy to say he underachieved, but when you watch him play, you can see just how much raw talent he had.
@Xyz500052 күн бұрын
Kicking linesman in the shins def didnt help…
@kowtow21Күн бұрын
Obviously Rafa was good this young, but I think of 2010 as when really first saw "Prime" Nadal. The improvements to his serve and backhand were so significant.
@azfarabdul14682 күн бұрын
Wow, just bageled prime nadal !!! Insane play 😮
@PonticelloMotorsport2 күн бұрын
imho prime nadal was 2008-2010 but still, top player
@TheRafaelBond2 күн бұрын
@@PonticelloMotorsport Why do you say his prime ended after 2010? lol
@eugenekudrautsau7981Күн бұрын
Guys, seriously, don't you find the term wasted talent a bit offensive? The topic is not about Tomic or Ernie :)
@IntroverderКүн бұрын
The Paris Tennis Massacre. 2nd set looks like FATALITY.
@geoairtravel2 күн бұрын
❤️💙🧡 Nalbandian
@tenisunamiradadiferente44932 күн бұрын
In 2007 there was no "big 3". Djokovic had no Grand Slam tournaments.
@TheRafaelBond2 күн бұрын
They were the 3 best = Big 3. You dont need a slam to be part of a big 3.
@tenisunamiradadiferente4493Күн бұрын
@@TheRafaelBond Beating Nadal indoors is nothing impressive.
@stanleyextra281224 минут бұрын
@@tenisunamiradadiferente4493 indoor Nadal is so underrated though, if Federer and Djokovic do not exist he would have at least 2 ATP finals in 2010 and 2013 at least.
@stanleyextra281217 минут бұрын
The term Big 4 has existed before Murray win his first Grand Slam. Not to mention Djokovic is top threat to Fedal and is capable of beating Fedal already from 2007. From today's lineup only Alcaraz and Sinner is at 2007 Djokovic level
@angelatanurdzic7508Күн бұрын
Simply amazing talent. 👍
@lsb90732 күн бұрын
Wow. I always loved Nalby, he was a fave back in his day, but beating all the Big3 at one tourney? Wow, that's something.
@tenisunamiradadiferente44932 күн бұрын
There was no Big 3 in 2007, Djokovic didn't have any Grand Slams.
@tkeee2462 күн бұрын
I think he is the best player who has never won a gs title. When he is in good condition he is unbeatable.
@Steevy84Күн бұрын
I'd say number 2 behind Zverev, Tsonga is also a good contender.
@learec72 күн бұрын
PLZ DO DAVYDENKO!!!
@elektrik_exekutioner68222 күн бұрын
Come on, Nalbandian never played prime Djokovic. He would have been crushed.
@ericnekli7631Күн бұрын
If they had met more often, both in their primes, of course Djokovic would dominate the head to head. But you can't tell me Nalbandian wouldn't take the occasional win from him, especially outside of GS events.
@elektrik_exekutioner6822Күн бұрын
@ericnekli7631 Not against prime Djokovic.
@stanleyextra28128 минут бұрын
prime Djokovic has been beaten by Fed in 2015. This version of Nalbandian would crush any version of Novak except 2011 GS Novak
@elektrik_exekutioner68225 минут бұрын
@@stanleyextra2812 Absolute nonsense.
@ai_Musicforlife7 сағат бұрын
Curious to find David only had 1 win against Djokodal in his WHOLE career,that is this tournament,David vs Roger are more fun to watch
@TheSlwLneTrcks2 күн бұрын
I really love this man, I idolize him ❤
@TheRafaelBond2 күн бұрын
Nowhere near the best of Rafa on a hard court.
@NN-zf7npКүн бұрын
People belittling Nalbandian's run should understand Nadal and Djokovic were clearly world #2 and #3 at the time. Nadal was #2 for 3 years at the time.
@goderer20572 күн бұрын
Nalbandian at his peak used to just take the racquet out of your hands, ridiculous shotmaking and cat and mouse skills. People literally used to guess where he was going to hit his backhand because he could flick it ANYWHERE
@felixy232 күн бұрын
and they're saying Federer dominated weak era. 😁
@brianwoo996323 сағат бұрын
Idk about wasted? Wasted implies he pissed it away, Nalbandian was married to the sport
@samwilcockmusic2 күн бұрын
His timing on groundstrokes was insane. So effortless.
@back-to-metal8 минут бұрын
4:13 weird shit
@carlheinz75306 сағат бұрын
LOL Hyperbolic hyperbole here. What a joke, come on guys.
@pawshands9706Күн бұрын
David was as talented as Roger, but he just couldn't commit to being as great.
@jparadabuc9 сағат бұрын
Not prime Nadal, and this is his worst surface.
@truthtruth90562 күн бұрын
And then they say federers era is weak lol nalbandian destroyed the big 3 at the same tournament to win the title lol he even bageled nadal lol new gen weak era is not capable of doing something like this
@michelegrassi4385Күн бұрын
indeed, i agree.
@RogerThatTennis2 күн бұрын
The man who could beat anyone!!
@therunawaykid65232 күн бұрын
Just brilliant from nalbandian made nadal look like an average player, great shot making and powerful shot placement
@sputnik85432 күн бұрын
2007 madrid paris run was a different gravy
@masters.10002 күн бұрын
He was the most talented player of the century.
@topspin4hand2 күн бұрын
To be fair he wasn't going to do this at other tournaments because it was at indoor tournaments where his game was the best.
@niceguy17742 күн бұрын
Unfortunately; it's about more than just "talent". I've never understood when people completely dismiss huge parts of Champion-level tennis by saying "IF only he were healthy..." or "If only he were mentally stronger..." It sounds silly. "If only I could get to more shots and hit more winners, I'd be great!" LOL
@sanekabc2 күн бұрын
Apples and oranges. Some people can be healthy and never be able to play tennis well. Some people when healthy can beat anyone.
@niceguy17742 күн бұрын
@sanekabc Top level athletes work hard at Staying healthy and taking care of their bodies. Other guys don't. I suspect Alcaraz won't last long with that grinding style and more torque than Nadal, but perhaps he will change styles a bit and adjust.
@TwistedTransistor882 күн бұрын
such talent, the word prime is so overused however.
@CapitanHarlockisback2 күн бұрын
If you want to see someone destroying Nadal, ask Dustin.
@therunawaykid65232 күн бұрын
And i remember monfils was too powerful once at the us open I think for nadal
@Xyz500052 күн бұрын
Think his last match was in dubs in metz..im gonna miss his style
@haziq12ish2 күн бұрын
Zero slams
@Kidgloves19842 күн бұрын
Fat Dave won every big tournament except a grand slam..
@Xyz500052 күн бұрын
Lol Fat Dave
@Noob_GamingTV2 күн бұрын
Nadal was 90 % phisique and 10 % talent, Nalbandian was 90 % talent and 10 % phisique (or even lower than that)
@osint63722 күн бұрын
Nalbandian was not 10 % Physique...He was much higher than that,,,,
@alexandermayer20262 күн бұрын
It’s not the Big 3; it’s the Big 4 - technical strength, strategic strength; physical strength; mental strength. Nalbadian was a 2.5.
@agus.L2 күн бұрын
nice
@heymarithere43962 күн бұрын
Tsitsipas will take this award(greatest to not win at least one major) away from Nalbandian
@GregNuggets2 күн бұрын
Tsitsipas??
@Jari_Sanou2 күн бұрын
Stef's prime has been far in the TsitsiPast we can say...
@mightyred6691Күн бұрын
Tsitsipas is nowhere near as talented as Nalbandian
@bluemarlin91102 күн бұрын
what a shame. Those big three would not have won that many majors if this guy were serious. Similar to kyrgios. The big three must be very happy that he retired early.