2.2 Rotation Matrices

[@henrynwosu6277]

Thanks for making this video. I cannot understand how much of your timr and effort it took to male it. Respectfully disagree in the matrix you got from saying "Express axes of frame [1] as functions of axes of frame [2 ]". I don't see or understand how this was derived. Thank you.❤

[@kispal16]

There is a mistake at 3:14. This defines the rotation from 2 to 1.

[@Woolfrey]

Hi Máté, yes you are correct. The matrix maps all vectors expressed in frame {2} back to frame {1}. But, semantically, it could be viewed as an operating that rotates the axes of frame {1} to those of frame {2}.

[@wh0d1s-l]

@@Woolfrey in other words at the timestamp π, there seems to be a mistake according to Máté

[@lukschs1]

Es que no hizo el cálculo

[@Fastsina]

Thank you

[@sahilrana8186]

Thanks sir