World of Tanks - Turretless Swede: Strv-103

[@HinFoo]

never mentioned that it can dig itself down with the shovel at the front, point the hull downwards front and it will go into a dig mode and put a dirtwall infront of itself.

[@gunslingerluckytankijunky]

Bruh

[@oskarjoelsson9494]

Also used to swipe and digg mines up

[@zynet_eseled]

Actually, that's pretty interesting. If used correctly, it could be capable of clearing a minefield. With the siege mode, it can burrow the front armor into the ground and then raise it up after moving forwards about 1 to 3 feet, and then lifting the front to clean out any mines.

[@Mr.deBest]

@@zynet_eseled only in games

[@bashkan6992]

@@awoowie_natebecause it does ruin the moment. It’s a massive feature of the tank and adds to its effective amour . Protecting the tank further. It should have been mentioned?

[@Zretgul_timerunner]

one of the few vehicles in the world that can be driven and operated by a minimum crew of one person.

[@Preaplanes]

One of the few tanks, sure, but I'd say the vast majority of vehicles can be driven and operated by a minimum crew of one person. That's nearly every every bicycle, scooter, sled, motorcycle, car, truck, airplane and helicopter, to name a few.

[@Zretgul_timerunner]

@@Preaplanes Most airplanes are not operated by one induvidual. But 2 or more depending on type. And nearly all airplanes needs ground personell to function regardless of their pilot requirements Most helicopters follow the same they are mostly operated by 2 induviduals Trucks are also vehicles where you for the most part need another induvidual for it to work properly at stages of use. But is in general a design for 1 induvidual Scooter and motorcycles are generally driven with one induvidual in mind same with cars A sled required alot more then just the driver to function... same goes for all form of animal based labour... And if where to keep it to military use theres nearly no vehicles used with few exceptions thats designed to have a crew of 1 in mind that serves a active combat role. To clarify theres about 10 people needed for any one airplane to do anything from lifting off to getting the clearence to strike a target. And yes one guy can operate this tank reload it and all maintaince of it in the field by design, same cannot be said of 99% of military tech these days. Or tech at all.

[@Preaplanes]

@@Zretgul_timerunner Most airplanes are puddle jumpers.

[@Zretgul_timerunner]

@@Preaplanes most common plane on the planet is built with a minimum of 2 in mind anything less isnt by design something it supports it works but by far isnt efficient. A pilot and co-pilot. Most common helicopter built has a crew of 3 at minimum 1 much like above its by design built to be effective with more then one induvidual.

[@robertmanfredthurrigl9424]

Interesting concept. Made and built for hidden ambush in a pure defensive role . Very complex hydrolics system . Must be a headache to mentain . Costly too . I would like Sweden to send a few but since they are not part of NATO yet thy might not be able to do it . That Turk Erdogan vetoed Sweden's entry into NATO. Islamic snake he is.

[@nightmare0721]

move over history channel, wargaming just took your job. I'm amazed how the Stv-103 is so versatile and fast. this is gonna be my favorite tank when I get it.

[@tobywallis1412]

nightmare0721 it's anything but versatile...

[@Shacony]

The tank is not versatile. Quite the opposite, it is very specialized.

[@cmdrantezscar3368]

WG has destroyed it now, any gun over 120 mm will penet it no matter what you do. angeling dosn't matter.

[@outwardpanicjoe8950]

nightmare0721 it seems like u haven't that many history things in the history channel lately 😂

[@Nugget_prime]

over 121mm+

[@SahnigReingeloetet]

This tank is very impressing! But I have to let this stand out: It poops shells out of its butt

[@KaptenN]

Makes more sense than pooping them out through a hole by the tracks.

[@zipp4everyone263]

Its called Humor =P

[@historiousedward4145]

Most french post war tanks did aswell Since they have oscillating turret

[@zynet_eseled]

HAHAHAHAHAHA

[@trevorfuson715]

There are and have been many that do...

[@Galvars]

Crazy Swedes... you build a legend!

[@aventus2140]

thats make me happy to be a swed ;)

[@emberke7902]

crazy wg managed to screw it LoL

[@aventus2140]

it should have an outloader >_>

[@emberke7902]

Or the rate of fire and acurary it used to have...

[@aventus2140]

yea but then everyone whines >_>

[@Cristinel007]

atleast is not premium

[@hihi-fi8by]

Craig Hayes-Kline a premium version cant be drown lol

[@TryptychUK]

One of the sexiest looking tanks ever built.

[@justdencla7596]

comrade why sexy tank?

[@TryptychUK]

@@justdencla7596 Because it's just a really cool shape and design.

[@justdencla7596]

@@TryptychUK oh ok

[@V8Tomek]

What a beautiful machine

[@galloviking4766]

So Swedish tanks are espacially designed to counter Russian tanks? Sweet.

[@Chregi1995]

too bad that russian tanks are the biggest enemy for those tanks ingame cause the have 122mm. 3x40=120. just enough to pen every shot. gg WG Just add some like 5mm armor ingame and it's all fine. We dont need such realistic armor values if they end in unreasistic useless russian bias shit

[@Sedna063]

2 mm enough, so all german heavies can do

[@justereife1656]

Chregi1995 overmatch is gone isn't it?

[@onemorebox148]

STRV 103 B has 50mm of UFP so your argument is invalid

[@Appletank8]

103-tier 9 is fucked, though.

[@Sam_Aconitum]

when swedish comes out, i will stop playing all my german tank just to get this baby!!

[@hornypervert3781]

Sam Arcade you know sweden uses a german tank right?

[@c99kfm]

For those interested, one of these was modified to be remote controlled. This was demonstrated to work in the field, but judged by the generals as "too futuristic", and thus cancelled. Perhaps just as well, wouldn't want drone versions of these driving around modern battlefields.

[@slikerdet]

It’s says a lot when the tank weights 40 tons with not turret. It has a extremely good armor but also a good frontal angle of the design. It is also strong in the sides. But almost no tank fire that fast like the s tank. It was also one of the first with laser range finder. It had many good inventions that people don’t know of. It don’t have a turret and that’s is the only negative. It’s not that easy to turn a turret in densely Forrest with much trees

[@RJLbwb]

No surprise a Swede would design an understated tank.

[@linusorm]

I cry whenever someone say the Strv-103 is a tank destroyer ;_; It's a mainbattle tank, it was designed as such, and it fill a MBT role, please staph insulting the Strv-103.

[@jonasbindslev9894]

In gameplay terms it is a tank destroyer, and there is no such thing as the MBT in World of Tanks.

[@linusorm]

Battle typhoon Sure, whatever, that's not my point. people call it a modern day tank destoyer in real life, people call it a tank destroyer, it's not :C

[@jonasbindslev9894]

***** There's no reason why it can't be both. Definition of "Tank Destroyer" from Wikipedia: "A tank destroyer or tank hunter is a type of armoured fighting vehicle, armed with a direct-fire artillery gun or missile launcher, with limited operational capacities and designed specifically to engage enemy armoured vehicles." It might be classified as a Main Battle Tank, but MBT's are generally defined by their versatility. This tank isn't exactly versatile, so surely you can understand why people refer to it as a tank destroyer?

[@Bikeru]

Armored warfare has that mbt :I

[@adamkilam]

CDC is a tank destroyer too

[@crumb6332]

6:54 please add this feature into the game! :D

[@KaptenN]

lol. Are you talking about how it poops out shells? XD

[@Shadow-zk1ck]

Think about it. When the shells don't disappear and the Tank shoots half of his ammo out. A little hill of shells behind him.

[@KaptenN]

And if you reverse you topple the pile, causing enough ruckus to double the proximity spotting distance for three seconds.

[@secularnevrosis]

Got to love this. "Unlike other countries, who strive to create versitile combat vehicles, the swedes focused on just a few main parameters. High protection and improved manouverability." As do everybody else. And a 105mm auto loaded, 1shot/ 3sec, 50 shot, 1500m/s gun.

[@TheLiberatorr]

Nicknamed? The nickname is S-tank and Strv-103 is its true name (Stridsvagn 103).

[@tenkgurlowo135]

I have been on arsenalen several times, the strv 103 is just awesome

[@TheKenji2221]

That tank is so cool. Been a while I know him (from Wargame Airland Battle) and I still love him

[@draege626]

A few thoughts on this tank. Given the improvement of current engine designs and the need for high mobility armor. 1) Ukraine would make these a total asset on the battlefield! 2) New design incorporating electric hybrid drive systems!? 3) Adding the capability of smart munitions with drone support.

[@tvgerbil1984]

They wouldn't be much good for offensive operations in their original forms. If they had to be modified extensively to improve their usefulness, the same amount of money could be spent more effectively on tanks with turrets.

[@PUARockstar]

As Ukrainian I totally agree with point 1. Was my thoughts exactly before, in fact

[@abizair1832]

Even tho i'm from War Thunder, i learned a lot from Wargaming's "Inside The Chieftain's Hatch" series.👍👍

[@Ato-3000J]

Generals: Strv 103 you are decommissioned. Strv 103: *sad engine noises* Generals: but you’re now a national heritage! Strv 103: *proud engine roaring*

[@RasEli03]

finally somthing we are good at

[@ostwind7031]

Sweden is good at so much

[@RasEli03]

@@ostwind7031 fair enough

[@Sceri0]

Amazing engineering !

[@Zoddom]

I would LOVE to know how this tank would perform against modern day vehicles. I would really like to see if it can bounce a KE shell from a Leopard 2.

[@Fish-kz8xw]

So long the most legendary masterpiece of steel , you are now part of the history.

[@GodlessRook]

I have this as a model and always wondered what country it is from and stuff like that... now I know :3

[@stabilisedchaos]

Well done War Gaming for introducing a tank line that was never in any wars,forget about,Italian or Polish or anyone else who actually saw combat.

[@SonsOfLorgar]

Poland doesn't have any tanks of their own above tier two or three. An italian tree might be interesting though, but hard to get tier 6-10 vehicles afaik.

[@Lonewolf8012]

So you want Italian tanks?? So they gonna make ALOT a noice and than fall apart directly after match starts??

[@makkoyun]

still better than having 'designed but never produced' tanks

[@SonsOfLorgar]

Pretty much yeah XD

[@Basih]

Exactly as SongOfLogar said plus the fact that we can probably get another 3 lines of swedish tanks. Light tank/Medium tank line, artillery and another tank destroyer line.

[@chomper720]

This thing is way to advanced for its own good! xD

[@GarryFam]

the world most weird MM i dint ever seen .

[@89RASMUS]

It´s a Carlsberg tank: Probably the best in the world.... :D At least it was...... In Sweden....... If you don´t attack from the flank.......

[@mitchverr9330]

The vehicle was extremely fast in turning, it arguably would be able to defend its flank better than many other tanks of its time.

[@fizzco3373]

Rasmus Wahlstedt It’s probably the best tank in the world... I mean it is hard to flank it.....

[@TryptychUK]

Carlsberg is Danish.

[@IllllIIllllI]

aww yeah! GJ WG!

[@zeyanjiao9542]

This shape is basically looks likes a science-fiction.

[@thesenateiam2955]

Can a tank without a turret still be considered a tank? Me: Can tanks with out tracks be considered tanks?

[@Kalashnikov413]

Wheeled tanks: *sweat nervously*

[@DrEtzor]

It's also known as a Tank Destroyer, thus it is a tank, while the SPGs in the game called World of Tanks are not tanks, they're armored vehicles.

[@gusgone4527]

Always admired this tank or is it best described as a tank destroyer. It's the ultimate development of the German Stug line of vehicles. I have no doubt that the design concept will return, when vertically launched missiles take over from gun tubes on whatever replaces the MBT.

[@Bill-xx2yh]

I could see it in a grouping of "many talents" or different abilities of tanks, creating a more complex unit abilities.

[@h.p.6223]

Nicely made video. Well done war gaming!

[@c99kfm]

Built to travel in all terrains, protect its crew, be usable by a single operator and designed around a huge, main gun...this is obviously the A-10 of tanks.

[@GregAtlas]

Was the hull mounted twin machine gun setup able to aim separately from the hull? I know the AA machine gun was able to since it was on a turret, but I haven't seen any resources detailing what the hull mounted machine gun was capable of.

[@secularnevrosis]

You aim the twin mg's just as you aim the gun, following the tracers. The commanders remote controlled mg has full 360 coverage.

[@GregAtlas]

Given the size of the slots, I would think there is at least some sort of control over the twin machine gun's elevation and perhaps even a little side to side movement.

[@secularnevrosis]

Could be. But I'm definatley not sure. Must have been 12 years old (30 years ago) since I was up close to one of theese. Was allowed to climb all around the inside of it. Fun :)

[@foorene]

The fearless vikings :)

[@lobstepgaming249]

Swimming tank? We need that!!! #boattogII

[@Anonymouzor]

that and snorkels!

[@Yes-df3xx]

No what are you talking about, not #boattogII, but #shiptogII

[@gamesghost2670]

#BoatStrv103

[@joekabira3986]

Looks like WG forgot about the Japanese Type 10 Hitomaru. It can reverse at the same speed as its forward maximum speed (70 Km/H)

[@wanikmal800]

Where did you search it? Ik this comment is very late indeed

[@Kanthannic]

​@wanikmal800 Hello! How are you? Ik this comment is even later indeed

[@mattmacd2009]

It can also be blown to bits while being chased down by a tank that can fire whilst manoeuvring.

[@nanomage]

Still not showing off it's party piece, digging it's own ambush/entrenched position with it's dozer blade.

[@canadianwaffenwaffle2976]

The strv 103’s engine and transmission can be easily taken out by a well placed HEAT and HESH but it is basically invulnerable to AP, and APCR from the front No crew should no be hurt or taken out due to a 30mm thick plate between the engine compartment and the crew compartment. The gunner,driver and commander would not matter due to the fact that every crew has a duplicate control for every crew if the gunner was taken out, the commander or the driver can take over so If the driver was hurt or the gunner is hurt, the tank’s overall performance will not decrease unless both crew is hurt, even then the commander can overdrive the controls and drive and shoot by him self

[@theephemeralglade1935]

The enemy cannot push a button if you disable his hand.

[@Kalashnikov413]

APFSDS: *hey*

[@canadianwaffenwaffle2976]

@@Kalashnikov413 oh, forgot about u

[@mykofreder1682]

Put an auto loading gun with video sights on top of a low profile passenger compartment with no connection to the gun. The gun would rotate so you can drive and shoot at the same tome of course, I don't see the point of the target on top of the tank being connected to the passenger compartment.

[@GrtSatan]

History has taught that technical superiority in military weapons will never overcome numerical superiority. A dozen cheap, shitty tanks will always overwhelm a single, brilliant tank.

[@petesampson4273]

It has been said that truly great engineers begin with something designed to perform a function and than start removing the bits that don't serve that function or can be replaced with something else. 1. Fact. A tank needs a stable suspension for accurate shooting and most modern tanks have active suspensions used in laying the gun. 2. If you need a stable and active suspension to assist gun laying? Eliminate the turret part. An elegant and inspired decision.

[@christiandtorres9843]

well argentine TAM tank can go up to 72 kph in reverse... so strv is not the only one that goes fast backwards

[@junyutan2172]

inside the chieftain's hatch s tank WE WANT MORE S TANK

[@mark-ti5cm]

One component of an effective defense (which is what this tank is tailor made for) is a counter attack. I don’t know how you could counter attack with a battalion of these tanks. There’s a reasons why most tanks have turrets and similar designs. Not to mention it looks like a maintenance nightmare. I get why it was built but I also get why nobody makes tanks like this.

[@asphelite]

Omg bless this tank its awesome in real life!!!

[@awesome117unsc]

At: 6:53, Halo: Reach Scorpion Tank had this feature too!

[@jholt8518]

I~~~~~ I'm hooked on a feeling.

[@petter5721]

Swedish Steel Kicks Ass Every Day!

[@Fish-kz8xw]

1st place of my most favorite tanks in the world.

[@Mut4ntG4m3r]

Amazing Tank ;D When will Challenger/Chieftain Show it to us? ^^

[@Paciat]

Please buff the armor to 43mm so that it can bounce 122mm and 128mm shells.

[@moviemaster13]

Sweet baby jesus its real.

[@DarksFails]

well as long as you dont bring in the overmatch mecanic they are useless

[@tongp1998]

for real😑😑

[@Sedna063]

Not really, only everything with a calibre of 121 mm or more can pen it. That is all the mediums excluded, heavys tanks from france and america. So the only ones able to fight it will be the Germans, Russians and japanese/chinese. So, you can conclude, it is very op for all guns smaller than 121 mm but prey for all guns 121+

[@TheLiberatorr]

No thats all Soviet and Chinies tanks which can penetrate the S tank easily.

[@Eagles_Eye]

if they bring in the overmatch mecanic, allot of other tanks will become way more OP. they need to find an alternative way to boost the effectiveness of the swede armor. wont happen this patch but they will do it next patch, they didnt give up on the idea to make swede armor relative, they just rejected the idea of the overmatch change would FUCK things up for the rest of the game.. the already "op" russian tanks would be unkillable from the front.. gl penning the is3 and is4 turret top., not to mention the obj 140.

[@storm4710]

actually what they did was to add a angle limit to the overmatch mechanic 76"for x3 which made the tiger II stronger

[@thomasc.3832]

so i was saying this tank is basically impenetrable to any tanks mounting a 120mm or less gun but absolute chesee to any 122mm and over

[@atanasijesimic4651]

they have plans to remove overmatch mechanics

[@thomasc.3832]

+Atanasije Simic but their new sistem as show by QB is flawed ex. a 183 mm shell from the deathstar can and will bounce off a scorpion with 1mm of armour as long as it's angled a 76°

[@atanasijesimic4651]

yeah but still thats quite unlikely to happen

[@thomasc.3832]

+Atanasije Simic and it would indirectly buff tanks like the OBj 140 is-3 is-4 and in general tanks that have weekspots based on overmatch mechanics

[@Eagles_Eye]

yep, im glad WG reconsidered.. its not like they GAVE UP on makin the swedes more relevant, its just that they noticed the change they were going to bring, was going to do more harm than good. glad they didnt fuck it up that big.

[@slavsquatsuperstar]

What happened to the mesh that protected from HE shells? Was it removed from the second test, or do I seem like a nerd?

[@NiklasAdv]

Tier 9 td the Strv 103 got no fence but the tier 10 td the Strv B got the fence. And the fence is there mostly to break down heat shells rather then HE. he will stil explode and deal a good amount of dmg even if it hits the fence in the game.

[@slavsquatsuperstar]

Oh that was the T9 TD. Oops

[@Biteofgod]

Actually it was to defeat incoming rockets or missiles with shaped charges, not grenades.

[@NiklasAdv]

Biteofgod Yes and it actually works against he as well :p atleast it wont pen the tank and rek it with the fence

[@stabilisedchaos]

My Conqueror Gun Carriage will give you a big HELLO! when I see you MrSwede :)

[@davidbadura7369]

LOL Strv. 103b will roast you

[@wanikmal800]

@@davidbadura7369 ;D

[@juyo4509]

this tank would look like something from battletanx

[@TheM6]

Just spam HE at it....

[@hampe947]

not from the front you wont, especially not when you have the Anti-Heat bars on the front.

[@SonsOfLorgar]

+Hampe200-Blyad HE will splash through the bars according to test server reviews.

[@hampe947]

SonsOfLorgar doesn't do that much damage tho, the tank firing at the Strv will be dead way before the Strv is dead anyways

[@SonsOfLorgar]

Hampe200-Blyad Well, that's only if there's no arty on the map... I'll be watching suitable S-tank camp sites like a Hawk whenever I take my GW-Tiger for a spin ;)

[@hampe947]

SonsOfLorgar hehe, the GW-Tiger is pretty ridiculous lol

[@mattkaustickomments]

When will they have these at IKEA??

[@wanikmal800]

XD

[@petter5721]

The Bofors Gun was superior for its time👍🏻

[@trannguyenngocdanh1412]

this tank will rule the the battlefield

[@hornypervert3781]

The best tanks are single seat with autocannon.

[@plutoniumgames2305]

If its stupid but it works... that appears to be the design philosophy of the swedes here.

[@FazekasPK]

Artilery vehicles should have "siege mode" too. So many of them can only fire if they are deployed, if WG is aiming to be realistic.

[@Geridebrecen1]

after they got some seriues dmg buff

[@wanikmal800]

@@Geridebrecen1 That will never happen IF the toxicity around the class still remains

[@wanikmal800]

Ye I'd like to see that :D

[@jamesmin5229]

WG, pls add the under water system so we can sneak up behind arty and balance them. That'd be great. :>

[@Lonewolf8012]

No matter how fun that would be, i MUCH rather have the tank back to how they had it before the nerf

[@XvShadowsvX]

Look's like an Arty shell hitting that vehicle will wreck it due to its almost completely flat profile

[@xninewxw7559]

Can a tank destroyer with a turret be considered a tank destroyer?

[@wanikmal800]

Yes of course,for example,the FV4005 or the FV215b (183),they both had turrets and their guns is 180mm+

[@Kalashnikov413]

@@wanikmal800 pls don't forget the US TDs

[@PUARockstar]

Yes. However, Strv itself is more of a Main Battle Tank and less of a pure TD it was classified in WoT.

[@BKohut]

Looks great! But with overmatch mechanics still in game it's pretty weak. Hope the camo will be good at least

[@user-gu7yo5yn9g]

Braňo Kohút the camo is gonna be godlike

[@user-gu7yo5yn9g]

Braňo Kohút nearly invisible that's how it's gonna be

[@BKohut]

Rex Roylance I hope for it. But for what I read, it gets a bit nerfed in loading, aiming time, accuracy and nearly everything. It has to be invisible to make up for it

[@humha7613]

Real life said that will guarented richochet. Wargaming pyisics said gun caliber that 3 times the armor thickness will penetrate no matter what angle it is. Please make the physics natural again

[@Evili555]

Humayun al Rafi Zuha well if the armor is like 10mm it will pen literally if I hit a piece of paper at any angle, it will rip

[@Kalashnikov413]

well, modern APFSDS can pen an armor with angle over 75 degree plus

[@henriklenning835]

6:54 hoooly "shit"

[@cubeeffect5612]

This tank should be nicknamed the bushmaster

[@broznkyra4853]

Like a modernized Sturmgeschutz III or IV...

[@blank557]

A Stug on steroids. A good decision by the Swedes to focus on a low profile tank killer.

[@ivanpoljak4642]

I have a problem with the Christmas tree does not want me to load

[@bentaylor809]

love that word- stritzvangh (bad spelling)

[@nikomas1]

Doesn't sound nearly as cool when you translate it literally, what do swedes call tanks? It comes to something like Battle Car or Combat/Fighting Wagon... Take your pick of combination of fore or latter words. Battle Wagon 103, Sounds threatening doesn't it /sarcasm.

[@YMS09D]

Isn't that also pretty much what 'panzerkampfwagen' translates to.

[@nikomas1]

+Dawn Polhammer yes, just add "armored" in front of what I said. The less formal name for tank in Swedish is "Pansarvagn", to match the full German word you could say "Pansarstridsvagn" but nobody really would. Compound words make names so much cooler, take note english!

[@Youtube_Globetrotter]

"Stidsvagn"

[@bentaylor809]

Goratchthemule cheers

[@SXsoft99]

soo not to insult the Swedes, we will not call the Strv-103 a TD it will be just a tank :D

[@aventus2140]

i am a swed and in the game it fits td perfect if you look at its roll on the battlefield

[@Basih]

Well it should be considered a MBT as it was designed to fill that role.

[@aventus2140]

well what is a role of a main battle tank?... for me it sounds like being decent in every area. a tank that can work in attack and defence... sounds understandable but i have a hard time see it that way on this tank... strv 103 is an ambush tank pritty much same role as the tank destroyers had durring the ww2 thats why i see it as a td

[@HinFoo]

its the "main" battletank in sweden.. duuh the main.. batteltank..

[@S939-n3e]

It does not have a turret that can be rotated 360 degrees ( it has no turret at all :P ) and therefore it is not a tank. But in Sweden we call it a "tank" due to we have other criteria.

[@GOTTHEDAWGINME]

Strangest? I would say coolest.

[@speltok]

Stridsvagn etthundratre

[@LtSarged]

50 kph backwards are you sure it's not french?

[@wanikmal800]

No it's not

[@nowthenzen]

Primary mission shoot and scoot? It's a Tank Destroyer.

[@Kalashnikov413]

but the Swedes designated it MBT

[@noliebowtie1315]

Well golly g, too bad the armor will be overmatched when they come out in WoT!

[@kimgrefslie7654]

now this is the pride of sweden folks

[@Bossyray]

Good stuff

[@brute6896]

We should all learn from the Swedes

[@kindofrandom6470]

I hope it will come in world of tanks blitz

[@wanikmal800]

It's a long run for WoTB to get this tank into the game . I mean,Japanese HTs are not there,but look at the Sheridan now . It has a guided missile launcher . WoTB has been ruined nowadays

[@KineticRhyme]

I would buy a cable if I learn that WG has a TV channel xD

[@oliverempleo5065]

how about a "turret only,no chassie" tank?

[@Kalashnikov413]

well, the German tried it several times

[@ry7hym]

10:33 what the hack is that tank at the right? that thing looks cool!

[@Gjaeralaus]

Thats an APC, the pbv302.

[@silwex8217]

they say it got alot of armor thats slped but still they nerfed the shit out of it...

[@Eagles_Eye]

they didnt nerf it, they just didnt go with the overmatch change they first wanted to do ( it would ruin the rest of the game to much, so they will have to find an alternative way to boost the swede armor in a later patch)

[@UmVtCg]

So a crew of two can sleep only half the hours because the other half exists of guard duty? That sucks donkeyballs.

[@b-rad344]

Is this tank still in service?

[@secularnevrosis]

Decomissioned in 1997.

[@j.t492]

it was nicknamed the Strv-103? I thought the nickname was 'the S tank'.