NATO vs Russia Military Power Comparison 2024 | NATO vs Russia military power| World military power

NATO vs Russia Military Power Comparison 2024 | NATO vs Russia military power| World military power
Hello friends, in this video I have compared military power between the NATO vs Russia military power to see who is more powerful In this video. I have Compared to the Army Airforce and Navy of both countries.Who's powerful military ? Army, air force & navy power. This Video is Military Power Comparison 2024. Russia vs NATO military power comparison 2024. NATO vs Russia military power 2024. Russia vs NATO military power 2024 | NATO vs Russia military power Comparison 2024. NATO military power 2024. Russia military power 2024. NATO airforce vs Russian air force power comparison 2024. NATO vs Russia. Russia vs NATO . All about NATO Navy vs Russian Navy power 2024. NATO army vs Russian army Power 2024. world military power. Military power comparison 2024.
This video is educative not to inspire conflicts. This Video, including examples, images, and references are provided for informational purposes only.
Sources
wikipedia.org
global fire Power -: www.globalfire...
worlddata.info
armed forces eu -: armedforces.eu/
www.indexmundi.com
Official Defence Websites (countries)
Follow US on Social Media
Facebook Page -: / world-military-power-1...
Instagram -: ...
Twitter -: Wo...
Telegram -: t.me/Worldmili...
#nato #russia #natovsrussia #worldmilitarypower
#militarypower #militarycomparison #army #navy
#airforce #militarypowercomparison2024
Greetings to all our comrades from World Military Power 🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Please be noted the owner of the pictures is this video is not our channel and belongs to their respected owners.
Copyright Disclaimer under Section 107 of the copyright act 1976, allowance is made for fair use for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favour of fair use.
Thanks For Watching
World Military Power
Note -: This Video is based on the Research Internet , And Thus may not be 100% accurate .

[@Makeyourselfbig]

Conventional war Russia doesn’t have a chance. Nuclear war none of us have a chance.

[@user-ez3vf2wt6h]

Уверен

[@user-ph8ti7fm9b]

and in an ordinary war there is no chance against Russia And no one has experience except Russia, so shut your mouth and go serve your country at least you will find out what it is

[@paulbrownett3673]

You are laughable - If NATO attacks Russia (it already is as a US Proxy and losing) then what happens when China and North Korea come in on Russia's side - THEN redo your numbers. North Viets supported by China chased the Yanks out of Vietnam. They kicked botty in Korea.

[@Hunter_t45]

​@@user-ph8ti7fm9bYes, of course, a lot has been demonstrated in Ukraine with its thousands of casualties from its inexperienced army and its obsolete weapons, close your mouth and go clean PUTIN's shoes.

[@richardstewart6900]

@@user-ph8ti7fm9b Please provide evidence and examples of your "no one has experience except Russia." Seriously, isn't Russia's a mainly conscript army? And I think you'll find there's plenty of military experience across the NATO forces. They don't want to invade Russia - why would they? As long as Russia remembers where her own borders are! Now, if they HAD to ....

[@suspiciousminds1750]

The combined population of just France & Germany exceeds Russia. Both have a larger economy (so does the next 2: England & Italy). The idea that Russia would attack Nato is ludicrous. Nato is more than capable of handling Russia even without the US.

[@dennisrichards7994]

You really think that Russia would be alone against NATO , most of the world will jump on Russia's side , you pricks are hated world wide !!!

[@user-ib7fh2td4c]

1945

[@suspiciousminds1750]

@@user-ib7fh2td4c ?

[@charlyvanbuuren2947]

​@@user-ib7fh2td4c Did only happen with western support for the Sovjets in financial and material support. Plus the second front after D day. But that doesn't seem to fit in the Russian narrative does it ?

[@Robsheph]

2024

[@opinioncounts5490]

Alert, the totals for Russia as of today are drastically lowered from this presentation

[@adamadamovich8788]

how do you know?.....I am ex soviet army solder, YES, most of russians weapon is simply old garbage......

[@Wadd3yYT]

@@adamadamovich8788 you sure cause you cant even spell soldier buddy. also they know that because statistics and observations done by the US and other countries.

[@nedruss7040]

@@Wadd3yYT I'm guessing English is not his first language. Try spelling, conjugating, & declining Russian words correctly. I don't know how their current war has affected the overall numbers, but what we have seen indicates much of their weaponry is indeed outdated. More concerning for Russia is that their training standards don't even rate to the older Soviet standards.

[@virgilioacursi612]

Humanity needs to stop all this! WAR IS ALWAYS SHIT!!!

[@nevenc7149]

Humanity is a pile of tripe.

[@EpuluMkuluba]

Va dire ça à Poutine

[@AntonioFeliceDedoni]

​@@EpuluMkuluba lai detto ha Baden?

[@madbadger6255]

Tell that to the girls and boys, men and women being raped, tortured and executed in Ukraine.

[@EpuluMkuluba]

@@AntonioFeliceDedoni Ce n'est pas Biden qui a envahit l'Ukraine!

[@ArchieFatcackie]

Surely those Russian numbers are out of date?

[@oldtimer3180]

Current

[@BlyatimirPootin]

​@@oldtimer3180unlikely

[@madigorfkgoogle9349]

@@oldtimer3180 yes, currently out of date...

[@HG-ic8ks]

Yeah they need to subtract a few AWACSki’s

[@user-vu9xl2yz4s]

They may count rusty scrap métal soviet éra stuff and the scrap one that Ukraine take care of to.

[@trekkingguidenepal9794]

No one is winning..the world will lose😢

[@markfeldhaus1]

If Ukraine loses the odds of every type of war rises including in Taiwan. No one wins in war but it is possible to have "peace" and lose. During soviet imposed famine under Stalin Ukraine was at "peace" but lost more people than many a war. This war was not a choice for Ukraine. It was imposed by Russia.

[@alanrobertson9790]

As people will always seek advantage when they can alliances are necessary. If everyone could live in their own box and not cast envious eyes on the neighbours then no wars. But humans, even animals aren't like that. Something to do with evolution.

[@asavage31]

Hope we never have to see this conflict because it would not end well for anyone. NATO is the stronger than Russia as a whole but, Russia is a nuclear power. If Putin faces an existential crisis I wouldn’t doubt that he would use a nuke to deter a NATO advance on Moscow. This would bring about a nuclear holocaust. We all lose!

[@BlauImHerzen]

The African Bushmen win, because they don't notice anything about the World War. If everyone else died out, they would still live in the jungle in their mud huts without a care in the world xO

[@stuartehrlich4499]

loose?? word is LOSE

[@goranmitic7500]

32 countries compare to one country. And lets not forget the most important thing. THER WOULD BE NO VICTORS!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@JiTiAr35]

that's the question isn't it. Why Warsaw pact failed? Why no one would join Russia anymore? I know you won't answer these questions because you're on the losing side.

[@ElGranLibtardo]

The US doesn’t need NATO to hammer Russia & China simultaneously.

[@bjornnylander8754]

Yes it says NATO?

[@JoeRuff-pr5xu]

Imagine...all that money going towards space exploration.

[@TroyQwert]

And imagine all these resources poured into non military economy! 😮

[@katarinab6728]

Si vis pacem, para bellum

[@TroyQwert]

@@katarinab6728, errare humanum est.

[@katarinab6728]

@@TroyQwert so where exactly am I mistaken?

[@TroyQwert]

@@katarinab6728 , blame your school, maybe. Or is it parents? "And imagine all these resources poured into non military economy!" "Imagine" is a verb that means to form a mental image or concept of something that is not present or has not yet been experienced. It is often used to describe the act of visualizing or conceptualizing something in one's mind.

[@katarinab6728]

@ert guess what - I know, what 'imagine' means. However how is this related to your statement 'errare humanum est'?

[@chrifus31037]

Putin : Make NATO Great Again 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@RonaldTolar-pg8uh]

idiot,Russia is the victim of US forced Aggression to Russia because 1 camp wants their massive resources and the other camp are the despises of Russia for Overcoming the atheist, Godless leaders of the Bolshevics and becoming Christian again. Don't you know who is controlling your foriegn policy in USA ???.. People like Bllimken, Nuland, Shermin, Richard Hass, Garland, Yellen, Kamala Harris and hubby, Levine, the ADL, the AIPAC, The MSM, etc, etc.

[@TheRezro]

NATO was overpowering Russia even before the war. It is why Trump rambling make no sense.

[@user-wh3zv3ey7g]

он ведет НАТО к развалу

[@marcopolo7337]

@@user-wh3zv3ey7g En attendant combien de centaines de milliers de russes a t'il conduit nonchalamment à la mort et pour un caprice de dictateur fou.

[@vicksys]

ya tak ne dumayu.

[@simplexdavis7482]

BRICS vs NATO is the right comparison. 31 Nations vs 1 Nation is a funny comparison.

[@Darth_Vader4.9]

So the BRICS is not a military alliance.

[@orionlt1028]

@@Darth_Vader4.9 for now

[@Njerimebanane]

Brics isnt a military alliance. China and india would never defend each other and brazil and south africa wouldnt be able to ship any troops to asia or europe because of the american navy.

[@yomama629]

The G7 is the right comparison to BRICS, both are economic forums without any military or geopolitical power. Russia's equivalent to NATO is CSTO, which is a complete farce due to the fact that member states go to war with each other and Russia does nothing to guarantee the security of its CSTO partners

[@lisadean5014]

@@Darth_Vader4.9 still a weird pointless comparison: one country vs tens of developed rich countries with huge military budget. In case of direct war It would be just a total nuclear annihilation of the planet

[@masternhl]

Парни, мне нравится такое отношение к нам по конвенциональному расчету. Древняя техника, Онли конспритс и призонерс. Блен, пусть так и думают. Мы ждем всех великих вояк из могучих экономик, котрые шерли энд обвиос справятся даже без сша!

[@sanygoyou8125]

НАТО думали розсипатися, але все ж ворог дурний ще є

[@driver01german]

Anyone travelling to the Ukraine with a T-54 and T-55 already has powerful potential! And the Armata is already pausing at the parade in Moscow 🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@timur3505]

@@driver01german So why Ukrs are losing? Did the've "learned" from you, Germans, how to lose big time 🙂?

[@driver01german]

@@timur3505 Just a quick question... What nationality are you? This would make my answer to your question much easier.

[@jhonwik7849]

🤔

[@figueiredra]

Oppenheimer tells Einstein that, "When I came to you with those calculations...we thought we might start a chain reaction that would destroy the entire world." Following a pregnant pause, Oppenheimer adds, "I believe we did."

[@geraldbeddows9017]

Think that tells you a lot about how governments feel about their people.

[@fongaa5784]

Support to Ukraine!🇺🇦🤜🏻🤛🏻🇬🇧❤️❤️💪🏻💪🏻

[@SergeyUstinenkov]

У НАТО конечно красивые цифры всего, но когда в последний раз она воевала с достойным соперником? Может так оказаться, что все эти военные бюджеты раздуты, половина танков и самолетов настолько устарели, что не могут воевать. Ну и главное - солдаты. Люди изменились за последние 100 лет. Если для защиты своей родины они и готовы воевать ( и то не все), то отправляться за тысячу километров умирать за неизвестную страну вряд ли) а если еще и Трамп выведет США из НАТО, то организация станет бумажным тигром, которого никто не боится)

[@Darth_Vader4.9]

А может оказаться что у НАТО все отлично с военной техникой и она у них новейшая. НАТО чисто в априори не может повоевать с достойным противником ведь такого не существует. А что касательно Трапма, то на твоём бы месте я не надеялся что Трамп выведет США из НАТО

[@SergeyUstinenkov]

@@Darth_Vader4.9вот скоро и проверим, бумажный тигр НАТО или нет. пока что больше всех прибалтийские вымираты и гиена Европы воевать хотят)

[@yomama629]

the only part of your comment that is remotely realistic is that Trump, being an agent of Russia, might try to pull the US out of NATO, although hopefully that would get him removed from office (and even more hopefully he will go to prison for his crimes before the election). NATO doctrine, warfighting capabilities, equipment, technology, etc. is simply unmatched on this planet and would godstomp Russia in biblical fashion

[@user-yz9zj5pn1y]

Если бы все эти деньги были отданы людям то каждый житель этой планеты жил бы в достатках и ни в чем не нуждался.

[@taand4725]

If more people in Russia stood up to Putin, we wouldn't be in this mess

[@user-xt3sd5kf5c]

That is not how the world works buddy, not at all.

[@AlexVoronCicerone]

@@taand4725 To vote against a person who protects Donbass and Lugansk from shelling by the Kiev regime, which has been shelling civilians in these territories for 8 years, means not to respect oneself.

[@user-hl2kb1eg4r]

так экономика не работает. люди работают на заводах ВПК, за что получают деньги, люди служат в ВС и используют технику произведенную ВПК за что тоже получают деньги

[@user-hl2kb1eg4r]

@@taand4725 бидона и зелю смести

[@robertcatterall6514]

Thank you Mr putin for making N.A.T.O. Stronger 💪💪💪

[@timur3505]

What's to you from that? Like to your "taxes in action", or you love rising prices? What else that you've want to thank anyone? Extra spending on heating?

[@user-ug5bq2xu6n]

Respect NATO from Philippines

[@LAV777.]

Нужно пидором быть, чтобы нато уважать

[@user-xm4hu5qt3x]

Эти сопоставления обычных вооружений НАТО и России показывают, что НАТО превосходит по многим позициям. Но характер современной войны сделает эти преимущества ничтожными. Тк при агрессии против России, Россия будет сметать с лица Земли целые страны.

[@sergiubargan2970]

Такой исход равно конца света , если начнут ядерной оружии стрелять то пиздец всем и всего мира будет а не только некоторым странам ( даже если только тактических пустят) исход можно будет приравнять Апокалипсиса и для России в том числе, по мне это не произойдет (период Ковид) и обязанности ходить в масках всему миру и была самая большая вероятность ядерной угрозы, моя личное субъективное мнение что стороны договорились воевать в классику кто лучше тому и лавры ...

[@markusweber893]

We have to keep peace. Otherwise human mankind will be destroyed. No winners!

[@thobamngadi5254]

50 countries formation to watch one country. That’s an embarrassment.

[@korelly]

NATO is not formed of 50 countries

[@yomama629]

The only embarrassment is that Russia's neighbors would rather be in NATO than to have anything to do with Russia

[@nevenc7149]

And still, they can't do the match. 🤣

[@EsaMyllyla]

doesn't matter who is has more fire power, it is the will and courage, Russia had the fire power in Finland yet only 95 000 Finnish soldiers died and 1 million Russians died there in ww2

[@zvonkovarda8682]

It is silly to compare USSR in WW2, and todays nuclear superpower RF

[@EsaMyllyla]

wow did you read what i write wrote doesn't matter who has more fire power, need to spell it for you@@zvonkovarda8682

[@MissiDamariss]

yeah same sh*t with USA. why 1st army in the world cant win the Afgan war

[@nledaig]

The Huns lost. The West built Treblinka but the East liberated it. You are going to lose this time too.

[@papatango5085]

​@@nledaigtreblinka was nazi camp not west

[@andrasjozsa1981]

One good news for NATO: "Hungary’s Parliament Approves Sweden’s NATO Bid After Stalling Budapest had been the final obstacle to the Nordic country’s joining the alliance, which has been trying to isolate Russia over its war in Ukraine." (New York Times, 02-26, 2024)

[@noasailing27feet]

And you think you will get from Sweden ?? 😂😂😂

[@aj_shooter4097]

They asked us to join what are you expecting from them?

[@zvonkovarda8682]

Veey bad news for Swedes

[@MissiDamariss]

so neutral

[@noasailing27feet]

And how is the future for Sweden ?.🤣🤣

[@ivansavinov6334]

Весь бы этот потенциал на благо людей...а не мерить друг другу письки, и не портить экосистему

[@anordman9659]

NATO does not have any nuclear weapons as an organization. However, some members have. Still a huge difference.

[@HOTROD864]

NATO does have nukes your wrong

[@anordman9659]

@@HOTROD864 Read my answer again. Some members of NATO have nuclear weapons but they are under national control. NATO as an organization only have one (1) military unit. The E3 Sentry (AWACS) in Geilenkirchen. Stop being an idiot and do some research.

[@anordman9659]

@SteakDiane again, all nukes belong to the nations. They are under national control. NATO has nothing to do with nukes. Learn some basic facts.

[@anordman9659]

@@HOTROD864 nope, do some basic research before you write stupid stuff.

[@user-aero68]

@@anordman9659 The same can be said for pretty much all of Nato's manpower and equipment. Each country decides for itself if and what to contribute to Nato should article 5 be triggered.

[@user-vu9xl2yz4s]

1 Air craft carrier for Russia? Admiral Kunitzof probably? Didn't saw sea from 10 year at least!! And just a piece of junk.

[@Chiginev]

Remind me, who a week ago dropped transcontinental missile in a meter from its launcher?)

[@user-gk3hu8pg6x]

Admiral Kuznetsov, at least you wrote the names correctly of what you are talking about, he will at least go to sea, unlike your new shit, which cannot leave the dock) or drowning after the first voyage

[@Platiaum]

Yes....and 42 Awacs rsrsrs impossible.

[@aj_shooter4097]

Been upgrading it for last 15 years. Probably has 80s tech installed now

[@mitchwhite1859]

Piece of junk. That's not nice. But since you said it, total and complete junk.

[@saandr0070]

Interestingly, there are many comments that these figures are no longer relevant due to the losses of the Russian army in the current war, but no one (or almost no one) says that NATO is also losing equipment, and sometimes officers, in the war in Ukraine

[@timur3505]

Ukraine losing, but basement dwellers "soldiers" here are in another reality 🙂...

[@nevenc7149]

There are no loses in Russian army. The produce weapons like there's no tomorrow. More than nato combined. Go and check it out.

[@user-aero68]

500k Russian casualties vs a handful (if any) nato advisors... seriously?

[@saandr0070]

@@user-aero68 Yes, and the Russians have also lost the Death Star, all their spaceports, they have run out of missiles and are about to run out of tanks. Man... You'll have to agree among yourselves about the losses of the Russians. I constantly see completely different information about this from various pro-Ukrainian media

[@user-aero68]

@@saandr0070 That's blatantly untrue - the estimates from the UK, France, Germany and Ukraine all agree the figure is around 500k casualties so far.

[@MOBILI-LAB]

Приходите, места (2,5м²/человек) хватит всем 🤗

[@adamadamovich8788]

в украине вам и этого не дают.......

[@jimibify]

Pretty outdated. For example, Russia now has 6 AWACs, not 42.

[@zvonkovarda8682]

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

[@alpearson9158]

most Russians have no clue about losses so sad

[@DivannyLegion]

Братан, большинство узких понятие на имеют что такое ДРЛО​@@alpearson9158

[@drake000666]

@@alpearson9158 Yes and you do, what you believe any number coming from Ukraine, they are as real as the Ghost of Kiev was.

[@user-qu8kg5zu3b]

​@@alpearson9158большинство европейцев и понятия не имеют что заводы в 3-4 раза больше сейчас выпускают все снаряды и технику

[@kimwit1307]

No doubt who is the stronger. Q: are the russian numbers before ukraine invasuon or current?

[@andrewaustin6369]

Clearly figures are from before the 7 day special military operation.

[@paulbrownett3673]

That would be the Russians - NATO Countries are too full of snowflakes that will not fight. Mark Twain said - "It is not the size of the dog in the fight but the size of the fight in the dog."

[@madigorfkgoogle9349]

before, and even that was fake.

[@lorax8172]

These numbers are the highest estimates before the war, and those numbers included all units, even those rusting in storage facilities.

[@nonamenosurname8516]

Yes numbers are before therefor whole video has no point

[@user-sj1ec9zh4o]

❤Россию её мощь!!! Она всё сметёт на своём пути!!! Ваша НАТО для великой России 🇷🇺 не проблема. Россия 🇷🇺 в любом случае выстоять сможет она богата ресурсами . Никогда не дооценивайте Россию, типа она слаба , она ведёт себя как пружина и в любой момент может выстрелить на удивление врагам.

[@astana1111]

Bla, bla, bla 😂👎

[@zigomar-m2m]

C'est pour ça que ça fait 2 ans quelle fait du sur place en Ukraine ?😂 Et vous pensez réellement faire face à l'OTAN ?😂

[@Greg15354]

Wenn der Westen so schlecht ist: Warum fahrt ihr unsere Autos, kauft unsere Kleidung, unsere Computer, unsere Cellphones, liebt unsere Marken und Statussymbole? Habt ihr denn nichts eigenes? Zum Beispiel russische Rolex, Mercedes, Sony, Gucci, Nike, Adidas, Lamborghini, Siemens, Apple,…. Nein. Habt ihr alles nicht. Kein Problem, euer kleiner Präsident ist sehr reich und wird dafür sorgen, dass Russland viele dieser Marken verstaatlicht 😂😂😂😂

[@user-kl8ow3kb9i]

@@zigomar-m2m В украине и войны то настоящей пока нет,так СВО.

[@user-kl8ow3kb9i]

@@Greg15354 а почему ты покупаешь наш газ,нефть,уран и прочее и где будут твои машины если Россия введёт хоть один пакет санкций?

[@Gabriel-ot9cn]

Russia has lost 50% of that in Ukraine. Any chance against NATO? NO

[@derHerrMueller2]

Null

[@richieboy1971]

With geopolitics in the state they are, you need to add in China, the Middle East, India, Brazil, North Korea, African nations in to Russia’s figures, because that is how polarised the world is right now! And I bet the comparison wouldn’t favour us in NATO very much at all!

[@yomama629]

Brazil is an ally of the US and would remain neutral, India won't get involved because they hate China and are interested in doing business with the West, North Korea and African nations are a total non-factor. The most powerful country in the Middle East is Israel which is a US ally, the second most powerful is Saudi Arabia which is also a US ally. China is the only economy that can threaten the US, but they certainly wouldn't jump gung ho into a war with the West if it weren't for their own interests (like going for Taiwan) because their economy simply depends on Western trade to survive. The US is the richest country in the world and the EU is the largest economic bloc in the world after the US, and militarily NATO is simply unmatched. Russia loses just as hard even if you add all that

[@birgerkagan6087]

But are those nations you mention "real freinds" or friends that will wait until the outcome seems obvious before they pick side? especially Africa to me seems to be unable to do much once all western aid stops and neither Russia, China, India and certainly not N. Korea have the financial muscle to compensate

[@kosoimiha1980]

@@birgerkagan6087 А Кто имеет ?

[@StreagleEagle]

tf those middle eastern countries gon do they being used by russia and would likely take the chance to get out of their grip

[@Wilé-4]

Very doubtful that India would pick Russia or with china due to conflicts. China would do whats best for their economy and war isnt profitable for them currently. North Korea would be with Russia 100%(with their 1950's weapons) Middle East would depend on the country but most of them don't have the economy or equipment to even attack each other(Which they are filled up doing) Brazil would favour NATO since they want to join it. Many African Nations are still in 1400s with no equipment whatsoever. So even with all of these it wouldnt change much

[@jbalsamo9013]

This discrepancy is precisely why a war between the two powers is out of question. It would end in Armageddon and no one wins. Russia is not stupid, it won't surrender just for ecological or humanist reasons. That being said, those numbers are theoretical to say the least. There is strength on paper and strength on the field. And most importantly, there is military industrial production. NATO may seems mighty on paper, but seems to have difficulties to provide Ukraine with simple artillery shells and basic ammunitions. NATO has a great military budget, but has to pay three time the price for each tank, planes, missiles because it has to buy them to private capitalist companies. Russia military complex is state owned, it won't have to pay profit margins. Reality is that no European power has prepared itself for a long term war. The logistic and the industrial bases are not there. Europe lacks basic commodities while Russia has them all, the USA would be too far from the frontline to compensate, while Global South would revolt and cease deliver the commodities needed for Europe to sustain a war. And if by any luck, nukes are not used and Russia is really close to defeat, I bet China would intervene, annihilating the only the true advantages still has, that is the NAVY and Airforce. That some of our leaders are envisioning this possibility is beyond me. my 5 cents

[@johnshaw8327]

Thanks for one of the few sensible comments.

[@nledaig]

You are being real. The wee boys who are impressed by these vids are living in a fantasy world.

[@papatango5085]

But you forget that the West have richest People in the world. Rotschild, rockefeller etc... If they want they can buy everything they want.

[@johnnykruton1221]

So just let Putin and Xi do whatever they want? And the fat little dude in N. Korea. What do you propose? Please enlighten us with your wisdom.

[@greenman8]

I'm not trying to saber rattle for the use of Nuclear weapons, or to diminish the gravity of Nukes, but Nukes do come in different sizes with different ways to detonate. It would still be scary to contemplate, but this is why different styles of Nuclear Weapons were shown. They are not all Hiroshima leveling style- big boys. The tactical nukes would be, well tactical. (still not a pleasant thought)

[@robertpayne9009]

Thanks!

[@Leoboy222]

🎉

[@WorldMilitaryPowerr]

Thanks

[@kuper6487]

Comparing conventional weapons makes no sense if both sides have a chance of dying in a common nuclear catastrophe. Then, in the ruins of New York or London, you will remember that you had several thousand more airplanes? It's just ridiculous

[@GenericNameeee]

In an age where anti missile defenses are reaching almost 100% accuracy, we will soon reach a day where nukes may just be treated as nothing more than really, really scary missiles that will never hit anything. I wouldn’t even be surprised if classified technology has reached the point where even ICBMs can be shot down.

[@jhepaletarivera832]

iam not from Russia. but most of my good friends that i met was Russians and Ukrainian they are really good people to me. very nice. beautiful eyes and smile and happy to socialize with... from Philippines

[@Vladimir.568]

Thanks a lot

[@user-sy5tr2zk4i]

Миру мир. Большой Привет из России!!!

[@snafufubar]

I take it this is without the deductions made by Ukraine? The Russian boogyman has been shown to have paper body armour. Even the vaunted navy is being decimated by a country with no navy.

[@user-sy5tr2zk4i]

Ну во первых надо осознать что Россия континентальная, а не морская держава. А во вторых вы правда верите что британские и американские морские дроны управляются украинцами, а потом прилетает ответка от России по расположению иностранных наёмников на Украине просто так.

[@heatherboyd3087]

I'm American. But I think both countries are bad a$$ and forces to be recon with. Love to both my country and Russia.💜 Prayers for all of our safety during these rough days when our leaders wanna flex their strength and put us all in danger.

[@gomerroberri7344]

Знаете чем отличаются русские и коллективный запад? У русских самый непобедимый дух, они закалены от ног до головы, им все равно чем работать, им все равно чем стрелять на войне, им все равно что в конце концов жрать, ведь как говорят в россии: «ешь что дают» Кто во 2 мировой фрицам пиздюлей отвешал? Американцы, Англичане? А может французы? Нет! Это была красная армия! А то есть русские воины. А у вас Запад духу никогда не было и не будет;) Будущее за Россией!

[@gomerroberri7344]

@@barilan5470 получается ты тоже диванный воин, если сидишь и отвечаешь на коментарии? Раз ты такой умный, иди воюй😉

[@lorax8172]

RU doesn't have as many tanks now. That 15K was the highest estimate before they invaded UA

[@kirilld6206]

NATO doesn't have a single modern tank anyway. Old junk from 80s at best with 60-70 tonnes and eating fuel like crazy even while standing (abrams).

[@MKUltra-ti8ts]

Да да , "у нас все закончилось!!! , Может принесешь литр водки , а то медведь мой куда-то потерялся !!))"

[@neilgale2292]

And 2 years later they have not built 1 ?

[@lorax8172]

@@neilgale2292 they are bringing 3 to 4 online each day. What that means is they are taking old tanks out of storage and getting them working again. They are barely making new tanks, just getting old ones working

[@vicamu541]

probably around 10-11k now

[@Jambitjigs]

Half of them Russian figures would be pushing daisies by now

[@nevenc7149]

Dream on, twerp.

[@obedeya]

It would be wrong to compare NATO with Russia, just as NATO is a multi-member defense organization, it should be remembered that it is a collective defense organization that includes Russia, and in the event of a conflict, perhaps China and North Korea will also support this organization. All the necessary conditions for the outbreak of a new big war are about to be created, the West must now take steps for peace in Ukraine, which it has prevented before, otherwise it will cost the West as much as it will cost Russia.

[@jrtjl]

NATO je utočná organizace

[@RAFASOP]

42 AWACS for Russia dont think so. What ever Russia reports half the number at least.

[@SarofSarof-lf4gh]

Support Russia From Bangladesh 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺❤️❤️❤️🇧🇩🇧🇩🇧🇩🙋🙋🙋

[@viffreddy]

Shut up motherfker. Putin is the most delutional president in history

[@Joeyd-tm5fp]

That's why Russia is all Talk .. they know the odds !!

[@dennisrichards7994]

Crap on clown It is NATO that are all mouth !!!

[@jonatikoisuva2695]

You can never compare Russia to a group of Nations. That is the dumbest and stupid thing to do. If Russia forms a military alliance with China,Iran and North Korea, NATO doesn't stand a chance 🫣

[@ejnarbrochmann]

China will not just Look at NATO destroy Russia , so try to count in China .

[@victorhopper6774]

the ones that knew already fell out high windows

[@dennisrichards7994]

Actually the odds are in Russia's favour , do you really think that if these gutless countries that are in NATO decided to attack Russia that the rest of the world wouldn't side with Russia and come to their aid after all the appression, killing and theft that these European countries have done to them for the last well over 300 years , the sheer arrogance of the white man !!!

[@BaileyArf]

Well we know Russia doesn't have very good logistics and it is said Putin still using Peter the great tactics.

[@hayudable3816]

This’s not about power, it’s about decisive weapon.

[@cz1589]

Except 1500 operational russian tanks is a more realistic number. Rest is junk, used for spare parts or to refurbish them to useful tanks. But yes: they build 100+ a month now, to cope with losses in the war - keeping the total around 1500 as well.

[@miguelpericas6154]

Well they make +1700 tanks per year, not including ifvs and apcs there

[@bakimc4722]

You're a number, so you know it, stupid one 😆

[@audonfred7487]

@@miguelpericas6154 Russia loses 5 tanks/days 1500/years 😬 3000 since the beginin of the War!

[@miguelpericas6154]

@@audonfred7487 nato Lost 300.000mill equal to 3000 su57 , they want to give another 100.000mill so would be equal to 4000 su57 o 100.000 tanks Lost 3000 tanks for make nato Lost the equal to 100.000 in money is great 😙

[@audonfred7487]

@@miguelpericas6154 It's not a problem for Putin because he will be president of Russia for long Time. 😬

[@richardm4825]

Russian numbers are vastly over-counted and don't include the massive losses at the hands of Ukraine. Even so, Russia is totally outnumbered in quantity and quality.

[@ghakon684]

quality - no

[@richardm4825]

@@ghakon684 Yes. By far. Not even close.

[@chordinates7268]

@@ghakon684intelligence - no

[@williamwyllie7072]

I am not sure what would be worse between living under Putin's control or nuclear war!

[@armandosousa5535]

Russia has no chance against NATO countries... But let's hope Peace wins...

[@user-sy5tr2zk4i]

У России не было шанса с Карлом Двенадцатым, с Наполеоном, с Гитлером.. Но как то им не свезло, а ведь как шли к успеху...

[@kili2403]

La Finlande et l'Afghanistan n'avaient aucune chance contre l'URSS, et pourtant...

[@armandosousa5535]

@@kili2403 y ont gagne 😁

[@timur3505]

​@@kili2403 The USSR was at war with Afghanistan - it was a guerrilla war. As for Finland - the Soviets offered them an exchange of territories to protect themselves from the coming war - the Finns refused. Thus, the Soviets had no other options but to use force. The result was much worse for Finland than the original proposal. And after the war, no one could stop the USSR if it wanted to conquer Finland. The Finns knew this perfectly well, so they switched sides at the very end of the Second World War.

[@user-ff4lr2jj5r]

It isn't just number of tanks, etc; it is the quality of the crews! The best tank in the world is worthless if the crew is substandard. Russia would be toast.

[@futte8024]

I agree. But also good, safe and well functionning equipment allows the crews to fokus and become Even better.

[@196Stefan2]

@@futte8024 A pre-requisite for crews to focus and become even better is their survival in the case, the tanks gets hit. I have a slight idea, which tanks provide better chances of survival...

[@ronlumsden3164]

You must be one of these clowns that belives all the flake news channels. And live in dream land. Just look at what russar had and set off 50 years ago. A intended 100 megaton bomb of hydrogen! It was reduced to 50 megaton to let the pilots get out of the danger zone! And was an air burst! And the fire ball was 8 klm wide, which touch the ground! The sound ware went around the world 3 - 1/2 times I'm told! This record has never been broken since! So Poland who thinks .it might be a good thing with all there nato troops running around waving flags and singing! (shit stiring) think again!!! It will only take russar 15 to 20 minutes to wipe out poland in one go! And most of nato as well! With out steeping one foot on polands soil! Nato won't be able to replace or resupply any body! Russar has told us what to expect if we get to big for our own boots. Please don't underestimate russar! They are not bluffing!!!

[@user-sy5tr2zk4i]

А ещё качественный танковый экипаж, ничего не стоит без танка, так как танк производит промышленность, а не бюджет.

[@Dollydoodldpotnoodle]

Defo Nato wins fr

[@user-xo6sk5oy2c]

Сравнивают 51 страну с 1 страной, объективно... и смеются что какие сильные.. умники удачи вам у нас есть сармат который любую проблему решит в перевесе сил.. Про ОДКб забыли🤗😆😆😆

[@alvaroscarletpoke884]

Russia havent Friends....

[@kili2403]

Mon gars tu as 20 pays en trop ! 😂 L'OTAN c'est 32 pays pour l'instant !😂

[@valerym1400]

Russia's weakness is its economy and Russia cannot win the arms race with NATO. NATO defense budget is 1.3 trillion. Russia defense budget is 109 billion. NATO can increase their defense budget, Russia can't. Eventually Russian economy will collapse.

[@user-ez3vf2wt6h]

Россия производит больше оружия чем все нато далбаеб

[@dennisrichards7994]

You have no idea what the hell you are talking about , the whole of NATO is a bunch of paupers compered to Russia , its the riches country on earth !!!

[@miguelpericas6154]

us 30k shells per month russia 25k per day, all denmark shells donated to ukraine, germany and those countries creating 700k shells in 1 year, think that more or less is what russia make per month, +1700 tanks last year, and they want to make +2500 they want to do this one, that not even including the apcs and ifvs so imagine yes russia cannot follow the arm race, they are already ahead XDDD + way better nuke weapons

[@andrewaustin6369]

@@miguelpericas6154 That is absolute rubbish because if it was true Putin wouldn't have needed to go begging to China and North Korea for ammunition and it wasn't just artillery rounds he needed he also received hundreds of millions of 7.62x39 rounds. Russia once had a large military industrial infrastructure it doesn't anymore as like everything else in Russia incompetence and corruption has rendered most of it unusable. Currently Russia has two main ammunition production plants and two main armoured vehicle factories which despite Russian claims are not producing enough tanks, Ifv's and artillery systems to replace losses.

[@user-hl1dq7nh4d]

russia has a very strong economy and these people r productive , not like those dumb leftist woke overpriviliged good for nothing imbeciles. russia is as well very experianced in waging war ...it actually didnt need the allied forces i could have taken europe all on its own ... russia has all the rescources it needs , and most people r highly intelligent ...unlike as is in the west ....russias defence budget is small thats becouse they dont have overpayed parasites in their organisations like in the west ..its even so russia doesnt have to increase their defence budget ... and russia will never collapse , they just reassemble their old tsar-bombas and start throwing them around .... that will leave the entire west totally demolished..

[@rickkinsman7400]

All of which totally ignores the fact that the vast bulk of NATO's firepower exists in the USA and is not likely to be deployed in Europe as much of it will need to be held in reserve against the high probability of opportunistic conflict with China in the event of war in Europe. This completely changes the complexion of the whole scenario and NATO's chances of outmatching Russia in the field would be greatly reduced.

[@pupinpupin9307]

This is one of the rare smart comments...spot on!

[@lattekahvi1298]

on otherhand if there were a conflict between Russia and NATO, Russia would not have all of their troops in Europe either, otherwise China would totally go for cheeky landgrab

[@timur3505]

@@lattekahvi1298 If there will be conflict between Russia and NATO China will not "landgrab" Russia, but instead will join against NATO - that's it.

[@kili2403]

La Russie galère face à l'Ukraine, elle ne pourra simplement pas s'occuper de la quasi-totalité des pays de l'Europe 😂

[@timur3505]

@@lattekahvi1298 "...China would totally go for cheeky landgrab..." - West always tries to apply his (imperialist) way of thinking to others.

[@larslewandowski6493]

NATO ist the best

[@user-rj4fn7sj5z]

If you take one thing from this video: Total Aircraft, NATO 24,009 vs Russia 4,255. Sure, raw numbers need to tell the complete story. NATO aircraft are two generations ahead of Russian aviation. Stealth aircraft NATO, over 1100 including bombers. Stealth aircraft Russia 12 to 14, but most experts believe the SU 57 is a 4.5-generation fighter at best.

[@mdupimorettont6165]

Hello, nice video, a short comment about budget, in general costs, could be interesting to indicate the purchasing power parity

[@BlyatimirPootin]

😂

[@longjohn526]

The problem with purchasing power parity is it fails to take into account Quality of Life and quality of product availability...... Sure a Russian can purchase a washer - drier cheaper than a German but a piece of sh*t is a piece of sh*t no matter the cost savings ...... You put up a Russian manufactured device vs a German manufactured device the German device is in an entirely different league

[@bramdeclercq6188]

​@@longjohn526quality ! That is what russia lacks big time ... none of their shit is good .. from weapons to cars to everything ! I would rather live in congo than russia ... 3th world piece of shit .. that is what russia is ...

[@hughjass1044]

Any comparison of NATO and Russian military "power" that does not include will to fight is incomplete and irrelevant.

[@nevenc7149]

Spot on. nato will to fight is zero.

[@claudiopeixoto4463]

What if we exclude Turkey who's a NATO member but a Russian ally? The results would be slightly different...

[@turk6882]

For some reason, other states in NATO do not treat us as if we were allies at all. In fact, they have been financing terrorist groups on Turkey's eastern borders for 40 years. When we carry out operations against terrorist organizations, they impose an embargo on us. These terrorist organizations threaten our nation and state, and the ammunition they have is donated by NATO countries. The amount of money Turkey has spent in 40 years to fight against terrorism is more than 4 trillion dollars. In Russia's war with Europe, Turkey will form its own pole, independent of NATO, and we will act with whoever is useful to us. Europe's problems do not concern Turkey much. Just like the Europeans did to us.

[@Countimounti]

Turkey would go belly up immediatly. Economy is already on the brink of collapse.

[@jonmce1]

hardly, Turkey would never fight for Russia.

[@user-wh3zv3ey7g]

Еще при войне с НАТО за Россию будет Китай, Иран, Сирия, Индия, ОАЭ, Саудовская аравия, Беларусь, вся африка. Расклад будет совершенно иным))

[@user-qu8kg5zu3b]

Не много ,а намного больше ,Америка за океаном не сможет с Канадой все быстро поставлять ,но лучше без войны

[@Elena-ef7dk]

They had to create an entire military bloc of 30 countries against one country. Who else can boast of this? Yes, Russia is truly strong 🇱🇻🤝🇷🇺

[@rolandconnor575]

My God, didn't know NATO had so much, where are they keeping it all?

[@alpearson9158]

in the 32 countries although some are deployed in European countries seen as threatened by Putin creep

[@papatango5085]

Usa

[@mfc4987]

80% USA

[@timur3505]

This is "defensive" alliance - did you know that 🙂?

[@nevenc7149]

In excel sheets. But it's real, I swear.

[@NightmareOfGreekss]

Support nato from Türkiye 🇹🇷❤️❤️❤️❤️

[@ridhoilahi-vd6im]

😂😂

[@user-zo3sc7sc8p]

Pauvre con.

[@samfyfe2949]

Ne mutlu Türküm diyene!

[@timur3505]

And who owns Crimea?

[@newtech5160]

Don't compare 1 nation with combined 31 nations such a funny comparison.

[@WWRTheJudge]

True.

[@jb-pn5oo]

​@WWRTheJudge the 31 nations combine as one nation called nato

[@WWRTheJudge]

@@jb-pn5oo 🤦🏼 i know that

[@alanrobertson9790]

Isn't that the whole point of NATO?

[@tommyhaynes9157]

That's like walking unto Walmart and wondering why you aren't in Sears . If you want a different video then seek one out . This is about Russia vs NATO...if there's a war it will be between Russia and NATO . That's why it's appropriate to compare the military strengths of these two entities

[@bonnpower5649]

Nato number one💪💪💪💪

[@Marcus_Sylvester]

Many orthograph errors in the initial disclaimer = I'm off...

[@Niklukho_Maklaev]

Очень даже неплохо для одной страны, против половины мира.

[@kili2403]

La moitié du monde ? Il y a 32 pays dans l'OTAN pour l'instant, et 193 pays à l'ONU 😂 32 n'est pas la moitié de 193 😂

[@BenderBei]

Если вмешается нато , я думаю ядерных ракет России хватит чтобы сделать из золотого миллиарда золотой слиток 😂😂😂

[@Tavignano]

если русские применят ядерное оружие, американцы будут беспощадны и ответят ядерным оружием.

[@john-toregundersen2655]

ohhhh my, where are the russian trolls

[@nledaig]

Laughing at your coping.

[@john-toregundersen2655]

laughing at your non-coping@@nledaig

[@nledaig]

Do your best Scandi. Keep up your support for grandaddies volunteering for the Eastern front. @@john-toregundersen2655

[@user-sy5tr2zk4i]

Я здесь, о светлый эльф из Европейского Сада.

[@sasaantunovic1291]

U maminoj ti pici

[@jrvanzijl1999]

The greatly detailed analysis of the nuclear situation is largely irrelevant because both sides know that a nuclear war would cause horrific destruction mainly in the Northern Hemisphere, but also affecting the Southern Hemisphere. This is a lose lose situation known as Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD for short). As regards the Ukraine war NATO is only indirectly involved. Vladimir Putin knows your statistics, possibly better than you do, and apart from some threats has made no attempt to attack a NATO Nation. In fact Putin has woken NATO up. They had been slumbering and wondering if NATO was still needed or relevant. Now NATO has acquired two new members - Finland and Sweden.

[@noasailing27feet]

Deagel forecast says minus 200 miljon people in the USA ? Big losses in Canada and here in Europe as well GB minus 70 % of it population ,vGermany minus 80 % of its population. Safest place from now is South America , Asia. Take care folks , i guessed all is planned long ago !!Time will show

[@stever2583]

Only Germany is asleep... and apparently has yet to wake up!

[@fluffyusa]

@@stever2583 they, the Germans are still drunk and will never wake up. NATO is a worthless organization though. NATO bombed Serbia, bombed Libya, bombed Afghanistan and what?

[@GRUN_LEE]

Putin has been telling Nato for 24 years to stop expanding to the East. As a result, Nato reached Ukraine, and Russia started the war. NATO: You see, we said that Russia wants war.

[@user-cn5ql7vt7q]

нато раковая опухоль на земле,а англосаксы паразиты

[@julianbranden5147]

Didnt russia say that they would control all of ukraine in one week. And people still think russia is the goat

[@MonwysDD]

Many people support NATO, but for a country like Russia, even if it is the greatest, for us this is a lot compared to the whole of Europe and America gathered together

[@TroyQwert]

You forgot to compare economic and financial potential of each.

[@user-sy5tr2zk4i]

Знаете вы не поверите, но война ведëтся не деньгами, а оружием и жизнями граждан, а электричество получают не из розетки.

[@sadeeshagunathilaka7199]

@@user-sy5tr2zk4i yeah we saw it in ukrain war .uu guys sttil couldnt to catch it lol

[@user-sy5tr2zk4i]

​@@sadeeshagunathilaka7199?

[@hardied3935]

NATO More power aircraft defense 💪

[@dugenounonplie8162]

only shit

[@Jagar_Tharn]

@@dugenounonplie8162 lol what??

[@victorhopper6774]

@@dugenounonplie8162 within 2 weeks russian supplies to it troops in ukraine would be cut off. russia would have to fight a 4 front war and would be picked apart.

[@timur3505]

@@victorhopper6774 Yeah, heard this before...

[@rlionheart8657]

The kintetic power comparison is pointless in this age where man has mastered the power of the atom.

[@jeffrood2626]

True. Very scary times…

[@abrahamdozer6273]

Do you see any atom bombs being used nine years into this invasion?

[@nicolasi1844]

How many atomic wars since WW2 vs how many conventional wars ? Conventional wars are prevalent.

[@abrahamdozer6273]

@@nicolasi1844 Yes they are. You have to seriously wonder what the point of nuclear weapons is if they are essentailly unuseable.

[@rlionheart8657]

There is a third time for everything. If it keeps going the way it has been we might see the third time very soon.@@nicolasi1844

[@MadMiktheBull1]

Co to jest: Pali 20 litrów ropy na godzinę i przekraja jabłko na 3 części? - radziecka maszyna do krojenia jabłek na 4 części...

[@user-zo7zr2vz9h]

На Поклонной горе , в Москве, результат действия этой машины)) целая выставка!!

[@ToiYeuVietNamZippo]

Tôi yêu Hoà Bình. Chiến Tranh là đau thương. Trí tuệ + tiền+ thời gian để sản xuất vũ khí thay vào đó chúng ta hay nghiên cứu và làm ra những sản phẩm xanh, thân thiện với môi trường hãy nghiên cứu về các phương pháp chữa bệnh cho Loài Người...... Rất nhiều thứ chúng ta có thể làm. Xin hãy ngừng Chiến Tranh và ngừng sản xuất vũ khí ❤❤❤ VietNam

[@MrEL28]

In a war between nuclear powers, it's the side with more dense population centers and smaller land mass (i.e., suffer heavier loss of lives) that loses. The loser is Europe regardless of the outcome of nuclear war between NATO and Russia. Russia's population is spread far and wide and has the highest likelihood of surviving.

[@papatango5085]

Not really after nuclear war it s nuclear winter and you dead with radioactivity. Nato has many islands in the seas not Russia

[@preachingflamesthepreacher3894]

@@papatango5085 clueless 🙈

[@Doctor-vn8es]

Surviving a nuclear war is not the same as winning one. No one wins a nuclear war.

[@pluschfilter8515]

Russias Population is mostly concentrated in two cities...Moscow and Sankt Petersburg

[@solodupuno6122]

@@papatango5085 What NATO islands do you know? Or did you count the Canadian and American islands? Do the Americans need you there?

[@socoman99]

Your numbers of Russian armor, including tanks, IFV's, APC's and aircraft must have to change by the hour as the numbers of all types of armor and aircraft are being destroyed as I write this. I think the latest number of Russian tanks destroyed now numbers over 6,000, so it's difficult to determine exactly how many tanks Russia has left. When they started fielding T-55's and T-62's from the 1950's and 60's, it's obvious that Russia is running out of tanks.

[@Giantidiot]

Where do you get your numbers?

[@socoman99]

Estimates from the Armed Forces of Ukraine ( which are probably higher numbers than the actual numbers ), NATO press releases of their estimates and the UK MOD, which is probably the most accurate.@@Giantidiot

[@Giantidiot]

@@socoman99 I will not comment that all these sources have predicted that “Russia is running out of X” for more than a year out of the two. I ll just say, wait and see.

[@user-vk6fn3fp4q]

1) 6,000 destroyed tanks is nonsense, do not believe the propaganda. It will be possible to find out how many were actually destroyed only after the war. 2) The military-industrial complex is growing in Russia. Russia was able to produce more than 2000000 shells in a year, and all of NATO 300,000. 3) Experience in modern large-scale war is now available only in Ukraine and Russia, NATO does not have such experience. 4) Different mentality. Only the contract army will fight in NATO, in case of mobilization, people in NATO countries will not fight, unlike Russians. 5) The war between Russia and Ukraine has shown that even simple old Soviet equipment is better suited in wars of this type than complex and breaking NATO equipment. 6) There is no centralized command of troops in NATO, and this is not a single unit, it may well be that in the event of a war between Russia and NATO, not all NATO will fight, for example, the United States will definitely not fight, since they do not need it and they are on another continent, and without the United States the rest of NATO, even a united one, will not stand a chance against Russia.

[@jasoncallow860]

The question with Russia is how much of their equipment is real and actually works

[@neilf1587]

Good question, Probably the best one i've read so far.

[@dziumandzy1]

Probably 20% :D

[@user-sy5tr2zk4i]

Насколько российское оружие реально и реально работает говорит второе место в мире по поставкам вооружения или вы считаете всех покупателей российского оружия идиотами которым не куда девать деньги.

[@sadeeshagunathilaka7199]

@@user-sy5tr2zk4i at least you guys admit that your position in the world. russia is a overrated one we can see it ukrain war

[@user-sy5tr2zk4i]

​@@sadeeshagunathilaka7199Вы просто не понимаете что сейчас по факту "русские рубят русских" Для русских украинцы практически не чем от нас не отличаются, соответственно мы себя сдерживаем, хотя и с каждым витком всë меньше и меньше. Киев древнерусская столица, в Киево-печерской лавре похоронены русские богатыри защитники земли русской о которых рассказывается в русских сказках, наконец Киев это русский Иерусалим. Но я тебя уверяю если конфликт перекинется в Польшу или Румынию, или не дай Бог во Францию или Англию, то разговор там будет короткий, никаких сантиментов или иллюзий мы к вам не испытываем.

[@Read960]

Nato vs Rusia 😂😂😂😂 32 vs 1 😂😂😂😂 🤡 Vs 👻

[@blainelooch]

Nato is a paper tiger. And do you think China is going to sit by and watch? Nothing but respect to President Putin, Russian military and the Russian people. May Christ be with you.

[@archbaligalachannel4765]

If during WW2, Russia, without the help of allied forces, loses war with Germany.

[@newatlantis2121]

God is presently on Putin's side!

[@newatlantis2121]

​@@archbaligalachannel4765 And the other way around!

[@newatlantis2121]

Stop dreaming! If Nato attacks Russia, do you think China, North Korea, Iran, and most middle east countries, apart from a majority of Muslims and African countries are going to watch sitting on their buds? 😂😂

[@trajan6927]

Excluding NATO, the mighty U.S.A. has Japan, Philipines, Australia, Isreal, S. Korea, and dozens and dozens of friends and allies. Don't think many countries in South China Sea would side with the brutal communist Chinese. 😅

[@UkraineMykolaiv]

Support NATO from Ukraine 🇺🇦💖🟦⚪🟦💪💪💪💪

[@danielr.8345]

Hahaha ukraine can’t even support themselves 🤡

[@hardied3935]

Stand Ukraine 🇺🇦

[@Just_random_guyGAMER-cl6ub]

danielr.8345🤡

[@EniRipsa-bv4ei]

@@danielr.8345 Neither does Russia! She is forced to ask North Korea and Iran 🤡

[@EniRipsa-bv4ei]

@@danielr.8345 It is very intelligent to compare a country of 40 million inhabitants to another of almost 150 million which until recently was still the 3rd world power. You are a champion of stupidity

[@petersinclair3997]

Individual countries and small national alliances need to appreciate the risk of threatening Western Civilisation. More so, when noting Japanese and South Korea identify with the the West.

[@user-ip8fr4mu9o]

Support to Russia courage❤❤😂😂

[@HansZarkovPhD]

Pre ukraine russia?

[@Evan490BC]

Pre-Ukraine ruᛋᛋia didn't exist.

[@thabomvumbi3976]

Wow! some comments are boostful about how Russia doesn't stand a chance, forgetting it's a stand alone country versus 30+ plus countries. And those numbers in certain key areas aren't that extremely high.

[@Tudor356]

Cecenia , Iran , Korea nord , china , etc ..Russia is not a country, it is Colonie a federation of over 100 countries, Russia is just a stolen territory with annexed countries and treated as colonies without rights ,

[@papatango5085]

And ? Usa is strongest than all africa or sud america

[@angelotoresani5270]

Awacs of Russia are 5 not 42. Some of Russia's numbers are wrong. There are many fewer MBTs. Many museum pieces and 50 year old ones....and many destroyed in Ukraine. Many Rocket launcher are very old Katiuscia type. There are many errors in this analysis ... too light.

[@gennadiytimar8977]

RUSSIA 🇷🇺 ❤

[@mrtmrthje]

Nato easy 💪

[@minargali1332]

Fuck bro hole Asian country is weting 😂😂😂🖕

[@lalva5798]

Russia doesn’t have a snowballs chance in hell

[@user-hl1dq7nh4d]

u r delusional

[@lalva5798]

@@leviathan-tk7rz HAHA!! Russia is the second strongest army in Ukraine right now. Now into its third year. The ideological war was already won years ago. The dumb ass putin doesn’t realize that people prefer freedom & democracy over a dictatorship. Russians don’t like thinking for themselves, they want someone to think for them-putin, the little putz. Enjoy your slab of fat, potato, and vodka…🤣😂

[@troelsersking2220]

​@@leviathan-tk7rzoff course they can stop the Houthis but no one is interested in a regular invasion where they hide between civilians and a long term presence is needed.

[@ejnarbrochmann]

What say China ?

[@bhoogvliet]

Yeah to bad alot of nato countries probably would back off when shit hits the fan. Nato doesnt work wel together

[@deceivedREALITY999]

I think these figures are out of date. Russia have less destroyers now and more submarines

[@abdulrazaqfils4234]

Team Love Putin 🇷🇺 the most love President in the world's 🌍 and most population President in the world's 🌍 President Putin 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇨🇩🇺🇬💕

[@45641560456405640563]

Grow up.

[@terrywrigley9751]

Goodbye Russia!!!

[@user-xh2xt3cc6j]

False comparison… Russia is not alone at the moment… take Iran china with Russia against nato Russia alone

[@bg1616]

Not really.

[@henkspoeltman9541]

Total bullshit china is not stupid like Russia

[@keefrasputin634]

NATO is a treaty. China and Iran are just suppliers. Your accusation of a “false comparison” is false.

[@keefrasputin634]

1. Russia’s military capability is being significantly downgraded every single day. 2. NATO’s equipment is vastly superior to Putin’s poorly performing military stock. 3. NATO would be joined by dozens of other military forces, Putin is alone. Putin’s threat of a Nuclear Armageddon are terrifying. The thought of a Putin, Trump, Kim alliance should be taken very very seriously.

[@garylcampbell9964]

Russian nukes are like the Russian army useless. How old are they how have they been looked after.

[@user-sy5tr2zk4i]

В России есть поговорка: "дурак думкаю богатеет".

[@timur3505]

OK 🙂.

[@peterpetrovic2568]

Prečo porovnávate NATO proti Rusku? Pridajte k Rusku Čínu Irán KĽDR a mnoho ďalších a potom porovnavajte 😂😂😂

[@GD-ze3ud]

Can you please make NATO vs csto I subscribed

[@user-ey5bb4ou9p]

CSTO is nothing more than just the hierarchical relation between Russia and other small nations. Indeed, Russia was not care about the territorial dispute in Armenia.

[@abrahamdozer6273]

Six out of the ten largest economies on Earth are NATO countries. They mostly have voulnteer militarikes composed of professionals who have signed on for and trained for years using the most up-to-date military technlogy. CSTO is a motley collection of poor and weak Third World countries. They would have no chance unless they fight like the Taliban.

[@tomasseman6388]

Central Asia countries are backyard of China now.

[@MissiDamariss]

And what about 'Russia+China vs Nato' Comparison ?

[@MissiDamariss]

@@user-ey5bb4ou9p But Nato is also is nothing more than just the hierarchical relation between Usa and other small nations. Indeed, Usa was not care about the territorial dispute between Greece and Turkey

[@mateo0608]

Same komentarze "love rusia" "support ukaine" ani jednego "love earth love all people support each other" mam nadzieje ze kiedys ludzkosc sie zjednoczy i zamiast wydawac pieniądze na broń nowej generacji czołgi samoloty bedziemy dążyć do samodoskonalenia się by rozwijac nauke medycyne byśmy mogli kiedys opuscic nasza planete i znaleźć nową bo jak tak dalej pujdzie to ziemia stanie sie naszym grobem...

[@qba4104]

Dopóki będziemy istotami biologicznymi to będziemy się zabijać bo rywalizacja leży w naszej naturze.

[@mateo0608]

@@qba4104 rozumiem cie masz rację ale jesteśmy też istotami inteligentnymi nasze życie nie skupią się tylko na przetrwaniu jeść pić spać srać jak inne zwierzęta. Ludzie rywalizują ze sobą we wszystkim i dobrze dzięki temu nie "stoimy" w miejscu tylko się rozwijamy szkoda tylko że narody swiata głównie rywalizują wojskowo każdy się chwali zobaczcie mój czołg :P szkoda ze nie chwalą się np zobaczcie opracowaliśmy skuteczny lek na raka albo opracowalismy bardzo wydajne odnawialne i tanie źródło energii. Wiem fajnie się pisze takie moje małe marzenia;) trzymaj się kolego powodzenia

[@SiArtTomaszBaranski]

@@mateo0608 Sprzeczne interesy pomiędzy państwami były zawsze i czasami doprowadzały do wojen. Przetrwanie i rozwój z założenia zależy od ekspansji, więc konflikty są nieuniknione. Nawet w teorii nie ma takiego scenariusza, w którym na całej Ziemi zapanuje pokój.

[@user-qu8kg5zu3b]

Лайков так мало и это плохо ,вы правы

[@marcopolo7337]

Il faut le dre à ce monstre de Poutine qui envoie par centaine de milliers des russes et autant d' ukrainiens dans la tombe . Ce type est un lâche sans une once d'humanité il faut se rappeler le Koursk .