I don’t care what sport is your favorite hockey, football, baseball, or basketball. The refs really need to be fined or suspended for making such horrible calls.
@jeffreycairns7678 ай бұрын
Would never happen. It's all rigged
@thatshortbuskid98018 ай бұрын
That’s a great idea I wish it could be a thing
@brittneeparker33708 ай бұрын
SO RIGGED!! I just wanna know who's writing the script?!
@josephandemmasadventures1688 ай бұрын
True that
@NoahHajosi7 ай бұрын
X
@awesomesquad39218 ай бұрын
These refs be staring at the solar eclipse
@Aaxolotl.8 ай бұрын
without the special glasses
@daveoconnell3868 ай бұрын
Facts😂
@AddisonRivers-g7s7 ай бұрын
😂
@maxvipp71304 күн бұрын
That’s crazy
@STIMPLETON7 ай бұрын
7:33 "Listen Craig, these nice fans are wishing the referees good luck"
@jayjayfool19968 ай бұрын
That “fuck up” caught me so off guard
@PerSixPlus7 ай бұрын
fr 😭😭
@SusanAnderson-j4u7 ай бұрын
shut up
@brennanmalone33297 ай бұрын
Same
@Riley-p4k2y2 ай бұрын
Same
@cricketsuks84752 ай бұрын
Ong💀
@patrickfritsch67528 ай бұрын
For the Gretzky-Gilmour no-call. Rules at the time assessed an automatic ejection for a high-stick that drew blood. Gretzky wouldn’t have been in the box, he would have been out of the game.
@danielsworld88327 ай бұрын
Keep in mind though the referee kerry Fraser didn’t actually see it….so he went to his linesmen for help….i think on e them saw it…problem was did they eat this one……Fraser did the right thing by asking for help….which linesman protected Gretzky is the next question…
@jeffreycairns7674 ай бұрын
@@danielsworld8832Didn't see it while looking right at the play
@danielsworld88324 ай бұрын
@@jeffreycairns767 kerry was obstructed…..by another player…..Linesmen could’ve made the assist in helping with the call
@jeffreycairns7674 ай бұрын
@@danielsworld8832 No he wasn't. There's no way he didn't see that play. The puck was no where near Gretzky/Gilmour when the stick went up and Gilmour went down. There's not 1 ref/linesman that should have missed that. But, there was no way anybody was Kicking Gretzky out of the game, even in Toronto
@billnorman-x4r4 ай бұрын
and it was not game 7.
@timothycassidy74847 ай бұрын
In Holland, football referees are required to meet the press afterwards to discuss the calls they made during the match. In rugby union, in referees are miked up and in real time you can hear the discussions with the booth and the players.
@BCBennyCAN27 ай бұрын
I blame most of the bad calls on Gary Bettman's influence. The day that guy retires, I'm taking a week off to celebrate.
@loganrufus13168 ай бұрын
Shanghai Sharks?? Daniel Setting?? 🙃
@someprickstolemyname7 ай бұрын
Exactly... If you want to be taken seriously, at least get the team right San Jose California is nowhere close to Shanghai
@LazerMage777 ай бұрын
Gotta be some AI-generated thing leveraging a voice. I am pretty sure that's possible. I've seen it on crime and cop videos that are posted on here a lot. Obvious mispronunciation in them. Either that, or this guy doesn't watch Hockey, which can't be, right? This IS a channel called Slapshot after all.
@Seafair144 ай бұрын
It’s a f***ing joke r u guys that gullible
@Kyle-ms2etАй бұрын
Shanghai Sharks 😂😂😂
@IrisChen-kz2qkАй бұрын
its san jose sharks im in jr sharks i know
@Apoch868 ай бұрын
11:35 bro really waited that long to drop the bomb
@twingtwangtwong18 ай бұрын
I was at game 6 in Nashville. This video just brought back all of the emotions I went through during that game
@sweeti3y8 ай бұрын
I swear dude.I can’t even comprehend how bad those refs were
@micahhellwig61386 ай бұрын
As a penguins fan I understand your frustration
@HunterPlays-Games7 ай бұрын
worst part about the gretzky high stick is that it robbed us of a habs leafs final
@Traumatree4 ай бұрын
Yes, and the Leafs would have won vs the Habs. LA didn't belong in the finals at all. It was a script from Bettman, just like he did with their new kid at Vegas. That guy needs to go, FAST.
@Jemmer75Ай бұрын
@@Traumatree Would the Leafs have won? If that were true, a single bad uncalled penalty wouldn't have been the deciding factor. The Habs were strong that year, with 4 good lines, 3 excellent defensive pairs, and one of the best goalies in NHL history. Lets just say that it would have made for a really good final.
@TraumatreeАй бұрын
@@Jemmer75 Habs were lucky to reach the finals because of what happened in other series. I am a Habs fan and was there at that time. And in all the series games, we saw a team that was completely different than in the season. On paper they had no chances... but we all know what happens in the playoffs.
@glenncurley6806 күн бұрын
I talked to one of the Refs about the insident and he admitted the Leafs would have beat the Habs that year.
@Jemmer756 күн бұрын
@@glenncurley680 Unless he just "admitted" that the NHL is fixed, the ref thinking the Leafs would have won is absolutely meaningless. People seem to forget that if the Kings beat the Leafs (the series went 7 games, it was not decided on a single goal), the Habs could have beaten them. After their string of OT wins, they were supercharged with confidence. They'd mastered shutting down top lines and got scoring from all lines. A real team. Would it have been a great series? Absolutely! Would the Leafs have won? This is hockey. No one knows (certainly not a referee).
@Redstephka8 ай бұрын
On the Brett Hull goal, the NHL justified it by saying that the puck entered the crease first, then Hull entered the crease and took a shot. The goalie made the initial save and the puck left the crease after the rebound, Hull got the puck back on his own rebound and shot it in the net. They said that getting your own rebound is not a loss of possession so Hull was fine still being in the crease even though the puck left the crease during the play. I am not saying I agree with that, but that was the justification they used. Is getting your own rebound a loss of possession... I don't know if the definition of losing possession goes into that kind of detail or not. It sounds like grasping at straws, but I honestly don't know. Anyway, the whole crease rule at that time was stupid anyway. I am glad that this incident made them change it back. There were so many goals called back that season because the tip of a skate was in the crease that didn't affect the play in an era where fans were begging for more goals.
@RileyTech7 ай бұрын
This is correct. You were allowed to be in the crease with possession, so without Buffalo gaining possession, Hull technically never lost it. It was just a bad case of the spirit of the rule not matching the letter of the rule.
@Kieva_Storm3 ай бұрын
I'm honestly just tired of it being called controversial. He's barely in the crease while pivoting on his edges. Makes no contact with Hasek, and recovering a rebound. Think it's just butthurt Buffalo fans tbh.
@MrBattlecharge3 ай бұрын
I had also seen interviews with Brett Hull saying they had changed this rule some months earlier.
@infinite.hockey3 ай бұрын
Yeah this video has some stupid calls on the list and this is the worst one
@jamduke78852 ай бұрын
Dude u know as well as I and every hockey fan that when it comes to bettmen if u don't listen to want he wants called and not called refs will lose there jobs that s.o.b. has his hand in every decision and call made he's an absolute Is bias judgmental Hypocritical Anti canadian prick oh and absolute Power controlling freak the day he finally calls it Quits I will celebrate and party for a bloody month singing " high ho the wicked ass hole is YYYEEEAAAHHH BBBAAABBBYYY 🎉!!
@edschramm67578 ай бұрын
correction, the high stick in LA vs Toronto was game 6. toronto just got beaten in game 7 and complains about it as though the high stick was in game 7. the flames one, given the camera angle, and the puck not being on the ice? i'm not actually convinced it went in. it would need to be clear from a directly top down view. which doesn't show it clearly fully over the line. therefore, no goal. the angle being used to show it as a goal i believe suffers from what is called the "parallax effect", which is a distortion in perception between what you see and actual positions
@jeffreycairns7678 ай бұрын
Toronto didn't get "crushed", it was a 1 goal game
@edschramm67578 ай бұрын
@@jeffreycairns767 fair enough. I didn't watch it. I wasn't even alive yet. I was going off a video from UrinatingTree that stated "Gretzky dominated them on their home ice." Which I took to mean that Toronto had imploded in a game 7, as they are want to do
@jeffreycairns7678 ай бұрын
@edschramm6757 OH OK. He was a big factor in the game 7 win but, like I said, 1 goal game.
@tbowers00458 ай бұрын
ESPN would show that the puck did not completely cross the line, therefore it was the correct call.
@everxtt_27-ft3gm7 ай бұрын
🤓👆
@UndergroundKillerKlown7 ай бұрын
As a Calgary albertan I can’t tell you how mad that non-goal call makes me I’ve literally been thinking about it since it happened 19 years ago, watched it live with my dad and we were screaming
@jeffreycairns7674 ай бұрын
As a Leafs fan, I get it. Unfortunately, Bettman has rigged it in favor of American teams. It's all about money
@clearlyarussianbot3 ай бұрын
You're wrong. It's at a parallax angle. You can't trust it. kzbin.info/www/bejne/bYTUdIyJpap-Y5o&ab_channel=HybridIcing
@MadChatterYT3 ай бұрын
We could hear the whole neighborhood. People were locked in and it was a hell of a time to be a flamer. Still repping 🔥🔥🔥
@bryanpeterson5646Ай бұрын
Even as someone who lived in Calgary, loved the city and worked for the Flames, I have to say that technically speaking, the right call was made. It only appears clear, but that specific camera angle is highly subject to the parallax angle effect, which makes it inconclusive as to whether or not it was actually in. It sucks, but it's true. I worked in media and have seen that effect in practice a lot.
@DarkKirby14LPАй бұрын
@@bryanpeterson5646 the NHL/ABC generated an image showing it likely didn't go over
@Bardowneverday4 күн бұрын
“Shan high sharks”💀
@dicksonfranssen7 ай бұрын
I was born & raised in Edmonton so this is hard to say. *Gretzky clearly cut Gilmour, end of story* What's possibly worse is that if the Leafs had won the series we would have had a *Toronto / Montreal Stanley Cup final*
@markfeland22857 ай бұрын
Never could stand Kerry Fraser, has to be the most arrogant ref in history
@matthewcheevers48613 ай бұрын
It’s pretty ironic how the number 1 WORST call on this video is the only one that was legal. I love to see that Sabres fans are still crying about it though
@cremedepoulet3 ай бұрын
It's legal now, but at the time it wasn't
@matthewcheevers48613 ай бұрын
It was legal at the time. Hence it being called a good goal. The puck entered the crease first and Hull never lost possession.
@seanmackey428527 күн бұрын
I don't think #4 wasn't a bad call. By rule if the Ref looses site of the puck he has to blow the whistle, the play is dead when he has intent. It happens almost every game.
@kennymik15092 ай бұрын
Great video!!! Sickening subject matter. I'm a Buffalonian. The "No Goal" I still can't rewatch. Also, I don't remember the year. It was playoffs. Ottawa at Buffalo. Senator right winger comes up the right side CLEAR AS DAY OFFSIDE. Dominek Hasek in net relaxed his stance waiting for the whistle that never sounded. Winger continued in...shot, scored. Hasek (and team) dejected. Hasek never regained composure....as if he was saying "What a bunch of B.S. ...to hell with this". Sabres looked dejected from there on our and lost the series. Someone should police the refs!!!
@Sunset_RailfanАй бұрын
I feel like the refs always have a goal to screw up sabers games, I've gone to soooo many games and only 4 or 5 of the games had good refs
@kennymik1509Ай бұрын
@@Sunset_Railfan May I suggest... recommend, you read the book "Counsel In The Crease" by Robert O. Swados. *(The Swados family was a prominent Buffalo furniture store. They were instrumental in backing the formation of the Buffalo Sabres hockey club). SPECIFICALLY, page 343 in the chapter, "Dallas And The No-Goal Cup"...More specifically the 2nd from last paragraph!
@ronaldothegoatee17 күн бұрын
11:34 got me off guard
@StephensMTB8 күн бұрын
Same
@thecolorofdyeАй бұрын
I love how hilarious your commentary is. The deadpan disbelief just like those old police chase videos. So funny man. The joke about bettman is great too
@TheGeographyNerd8 ай бұрын
The Preds vs Penguins call isn’t necessarily BAD, it’s just annoying. From the refs perspective it looked like he had covered the puck, and so he blew the whistle to stop the play.
@getzbeamed57957 ай бұрын
And nowadays it happens quite often that refs blow the play dead bcz they lose sight of
@jeffreycairns7674 ай бұрын
What I don't get is sometimes it's a quick whistle while other times it seems to take forever. Even with the same refs
@davidwaxter663 ай бұрын
@@jeffreycairns767depends on what you see and how the goalie reacts. Murray definitely locked up trying not to move thinking the puck was in his gear. The ref sees that and quick whistle. Other times when the goalie is still looking around or moving it will be a delayed whistle until the ref decides it is covered
@jeffreycairns7673 ай бұрын
@davidwaxter66 I get that but you have to admit, there have been many, many times that a whistle barely touches a goalie and the whistle blows while other times, it's clear the puck is smothered yet still takes 5+ seconds to blow it dead. The average whistle I agree with you but I'm not talking the average whistle.
@tiantiger350427 күн бұрын
11:34 Caught me off guard, the whole video was family friendly and the f bomb was so sudden😂😂
@Clarke.81-t5cАй бұрын
1:46 was not goalie interference
@queensgaelsmenshockeyАй бұрын
Price is already down to make the save and gets caught up with Hayes leg. 100% a good goal
@TherealseverussnapeАй бұрын
I was about to say that, Price’s pads were outside of the blue paint, and it was a follow-through on the shot. 100% a good goal.
@cjstream7530Ай бұрын
Was looking for this comment
@anthonyperron6741Ай бұрын
Yep, good goal
@WINRANGERS9916 күн бұрын
Bro, that was not an interference. I agree 100% that’s some BS ref made the right call. 1:46
@gmercede7 ай бұрын
If the ref doesnt see the penalty, they cant lie and call it later.
@Axelbenoit138 ай бұрын
Number 8 isn't goalie interference Pricee just slid over in to him and his leg caught on Prices pad.
@jeffreycairns7678 ай бұрын
Exactly, outside the crease
@gmercede7 ай бұрын
Exactly. Find another bad call to make your top 10 list. And apologize to the ref about the parlay bet comment
@XxNoMErcY99xX6 ай бұрын
So if a goalie is an inch outside the crease and gets dragged completely into the corner, that should be a good goal? Makes sense......
@jeffreycairns7676 ай бұрын
@XxNoMErcY99xX 1. That has never happened in the history of the league. 2. Even if it did, it would be a penalty. It's no different then a goalie coming out to play the puck. It's 1 thing to tap a goalie while outside the crease but something completely different to hit, or drag, a goalie. If they called a goal off for a goalie being touched outside the crease, goalies would constantly be outside the crease making sure to get tapped by somebody.
@DarkN1nja774 ай бұрын
@@XxNoMErcY99xX he got dragged cause he forced it to happen skater skating towards the boards and leg got caught in between pads when he was skating that way making the move then price stick his pads up while he was trying to get out he was dragged cause of momentum of where he was skating how is that interference you goalies try to get every damn weak call in the book
@fathersilas94632 ай бұрын
11:30 lmao 🤣 didn’t expect “the fuck up” to come out 😂
@timetothinkbereal8 ай бұрын
3:31\\ was a hit from behind. Clear back of shoulder and arm/ Good call.
@Macinator363 ай бұрын
exactly also boarding
@BCBennyCAN27 ай бұрын
2024 game 6 second round, McDavid (aka McSlashy), Captian of the Oilers cut the face of Canusks Captian Hughes . No call double two minute right in front the ref. To rub it in they made Hughes leave the ice for bleeding.
@headintheclouds69353 ай бұрын
It's the oilers they always get the calls their way. Have to protect McDavid
@robloxwithacetheavenger49087 ай бұрын
Bro called the San Jose Sharks the Shanghai Sharks
@marcbelanger81713 күн бұрын
at 1:44, there was no goalie interference at all,
@alieak012 күн бұрын
Yeah, like the goalie was out of the crease
@marcbelanger8172 күн бұрын
@@alieak01 the skate got caught accidentally,
@lukeracer972 ай бұрын
1:15, that is how the rules work
@WizzardofOdds8 ай бұрын
There was a call in game 5 between Canucks and Oilers that should make your next list. Pettersson of the Canucks clears the puck out of his end and an Oiler skates into the back of him and falls, Pettersson get called for charging and he was standing still. Nice to see your referees were the usual suspects. Better put Kelly Sutherland into that mix of referees.
@philippevincens27788 ай бұрын
He clearly jumped so yeah it’s charging good call
@theultra54828 ай бұрын
@@philippevincens2778? Petterson was a literal statue.
@dannyjackson53567 ай бұрын
@@theultra5482 A statue that hops to get the center of gravity of something is about to demolish it, maybe. Your feet cannot leave the ice in any manner when contact is being made. It is a cheap shot, a dangerous play, and clearly a an aspect of charging that needs to be removed from the game, hence why it is called a penalty practically every time it happens these days. The real truth was Petterson has zero physical presence. Instead of standing his ground and doing a reverse check or taking the body to make a play he jumped using the player's own momentum against him. IMO that type of play is equivalent to ducking a check near the boards. Its weak af. Petterson should be embarrassed by the performance he put up this post season. That was a great call , charging all day
@SeanRogan17 ай бұрын
@@dannyjackson5356 like be honest I think it was a bit of a weak call but by definition it is a penalty. Lots of worse ones are let go in the playoffs though.
@brennanmalone33297 ай бұрын
That was a fair call you can’t jump and hit someone
@Thiera1989Ай бұрын
I love the thumbnail, which kinda looks like McDavid is grabbing the ref by the jersey! Of course, that is absolutely NOT allowed, but it's still funny 🤣
@OscarThomannАй бұрын
As a saber fan i’m going insane rn
@LukeRoberson-j6t12 күн бұрын
Uhhhh... the Shanghai Sharks?!?!?!
@CH_stopmotion13 күн бұрын
that last one had to be personal for him 💀
@Xanlet18 күн бұрын
Of the 5 calls that included a Canadian team here, all 5 of them went against the Canadian team and in favor of an American team. Really makes you think.
@danieliorio45374 ай бұрын
I'm sorry, but 1:35 is Prices fault. Look closely. I know he was making a save, but his pad moved to Hayes direction and hit his skate. Hayes didn't directly skate into his pad.. You're on ice, obviously you're going to slide with that bump, especially when the skate hits the area of the pads that Price moved his pad to...
@danieliorio45373 ай бұрын
Honestly, it's no one's fault, shit happens. It's hockey, it's a rough sport, it happens lol.
@nicnac13 ай бұрын
1:47 how is that not the right call? Carey price is the one who came flying out the crease and ran into the player? The red did a good job.
@samthomson7991Ай бұрын
Are you drunk? Price was in his fucking crease lmao. The only time he left it was when the Rangers player accidentally dragged him out of it. You need to get your eyes checked bud
@CaptainRandus7 ай бұрын
Some of these clips were actually the right call... Just pissed off results
@sambennettnumber1fanАй бұрын
As a minor hockey ref, and not a crazy KZbinr, I agree with the refs on number 9, 8, 6, 4 and 2
@SpiritEdits123Ай бұрын
Ok no one get mad at me but 0:44 actually is seems like the right call to me. The play was developing somewhere else but there was penalty’s given to the Chicago team when they had the puck so the play should’ve stopped.❤😂
@TreshanAlles9 күн бұрын
It doesn't matter what happens somewhere on the ice. The play always continues unless the ref blows his whistle. Play does not stop for anything other than the whistle.
@MrGerard04062 күн бұрын
That Carey Price one at 1:40 is a good goal any day of the week.. no contact was made in the crease, Price slid way too far
@memphissander351223 күн бұрын
6:30 that old guys broadcast partner seems insufferable.
@donsmeltzer40834 ай бұрын
The non call on Gretzky was in game 6. The Leafs still had a chance to win in game 7.
@jeffreycairns7674 ай бұрын
Although true, there never should of been a game 7
@AlexAnder-yj1qs3 ай бұрын
"Seddy-in". Good ol Canucks legend... Daniel "Seddy-in".
@TrevorCowan6 ай бұрын
4:00 "subscribe if you hate me" 💀💀💀
@YourYoungGDYter2 ай бұрын
I love Gary bettman (I’m not gay tho)
@YourYoungGDYter2 ай бұрын
11:25
@CalculatedRiskAK2 ай бұрын
If I recall, that Nashville call is what led to being able to review if a goal should be allowed because "play should have continued". In today's NHL, that call would have been overturned and ruled a goal.
@Sharko-165911 күн бұрын
7:20 bro this happend to my oilers this year it was so rigged at least we won but still it was a horrible call IM BLIND IM DEAF I WANNA BE A REF
@SaguaroStash3 ай бұрын
Calling them the Shanghai sharks is an act of war
@RileyTech7 ай бұрын
How many times does the Brett Hull goal need to be explained? At the time, players with possession could be in the crease, and you didn't lose possession by getting your own rebound.
@tonyp9313Ай бұрын
The rule wasn't clear to the players. Even Hull said he wasn't clear of the rule, but shot the puck in anyways. Goala were being called back all playoffs when they were in the crease.
@baystatepowersports82398 ай бұрын
Surprised this video wasn’t all the 2024 playoffs officiating
@MegAGAM3RMaNАй бұрын
7:36 they are wishing the refs good luck😂😂 give that guy a raise
@rickpapineau59397 ай бұрын
Also, Gelinas DEFINITELY scored in game 6... strangely, the refs also missed a DEFINITE trip by Marty St. Louis against Iginla which was immediately followed by the game winning goal by Tampa.
@goalscorerlajon3 ай бұрын
Slapshot: the 'non call' at #5 happened in Game 6 of the 1993 Western Conference Finals. NOT Game 7. Game 7 was is Toronto at Maple Leaf Gardens and Wayne had 3 goals (a hat trick) and 1 assist for 4 points in Game 7. Wayne has said that was the best game he's ever played in the NHL. Your moment at #2... Game 6 was in CALGARY; NOT Tampa Bay.
@Cryxboy28 күн бұрын
To be fair on the Islanders/Panthers game, the Panthers players were blatantly diving the second the sticks touched them/ intentionally tripped themselves over inactive/immobile sticks to bait calls. Refs are not going to whistle that shit in playoffs.
@richc43887 ай бұрын
I don’t think I’ve ever heard this guy swear in a video. I gotta say.. I like it!
@itzzzdk2 ай бұрын
#8 is a legal goal, Price's pad got stuck on the skate and the momentum brought him out. #6 is a boarding call, no intent to play the puck and it was late head first into the boards. #5, should've been a high stick yes, however the 3 official system is not fool proof and things will be missed, thats why they adopted 4. #4 is not a bad call, its an unfortunate mistake that happens.
@adamt.borrowmanmr.mattobei98656 ай бұрын
9:11 that should have been “Tripping penalty”.
@fast9938 ай бұрын
Anyone with a basic understating of angles knows that the flames did not in fact score
@jessicamah3264 ай бұрын
He's definitely a oilers fan
@Oni_Null3 ай бұрын
The one where they “drag” Price out of the net i can see going either way, it has to be avoidable contact. Price forcing his pad out to make the save and into the path of the skater who then gets his skate stuck in the pad could be argued as unavoidable in the time he had. But i wouldnt be mad if they called it either
@skeptic108 ай бұрын
How is number 4 bad call? An early whistle yes, but not a bad call. The play was dead and puck was put in the net after the whistle. Do you mean that the right call would have been a good goal?
@skeptic108 ай бұрын
Actually when looking through all of them, many of them were the right call. For example, Hull goal, Gelinas no goal. The Gelinas goal was inconclusive, and the call on ice was no goal. It went by the rulebook. The Gretzky Gilmour high stick was a missed call as Fraser did not see it and Gilmour said Fraser it was a follow through even though it was not. Fraser had to go with the information he had and not call a penalty. There have been many many worse calls than these.
@jeffreycairns7678 ай бұрын
The Gretzky one is very hard to buy as Fraser was looking right at them when it happened. There was no way he was kicking Gretzky out of that game
@brianaflanigan58687 ай бұрын
5:56 💀 7:31 “Ref you suck! Ref you suck! Ref you suck! Ref you suck! Ref you suck! Ref you suck!”
@RedmenanceTheOfficial2 ай бұрын
When it’s almost under 2-1 minutes left in the 3rd period or anywhere in overtime, sometimes you’ll get away with penalties and goals that should or should not count, sometimes you don’t. Daniel Sedin didn’t with a penalty, Alex burrows didn’t with a penalty but Wayne Gretzky did with a penalty
@drunkpinata12103 ай бұрын
3:43 it’s literally boarding. Good call.
@ronpeacock9939Ай бұрын
one of these was a mistake... the lost sight of the puck... I'm sure the first linesman that got to him told him he kicked it. The #2... tough to see... the burrows calls.. that ref should have been banned from working games with that team... #1.. the day Buffalo fans knew the league was rigged... The Gretzky... back in the days of 1 referee.. OMG you just didn't realize how much 1 guy can miss when he's alone.. the 2 ref system makes a huge difference. Still... the fine against Burrows... just shows why so many think Gary Bettman is NOT impartial.
@dillonwong36467 ай бұрын
2004 still haunts me..... Flames were the cup winners
@theultra54828 ай бұрын
The worst one gotta be Game 5 of Oilers vs Cannucks this year. Where Patterson (From Cannucks) got a call for Charging when the other dude charged him, Patterson was just standing there passing to a teammate. Oilers was even very confused and even Oilers fans were throwing stuff at the ref.
@larrygrassinger28197 ай бұрын
Before you rant, you should at least learn the player's names. Who is Patterson? To the best of my recollection, nobody by that name has ever played in the NHL.
@1TreeStudio3 ай бұрын
the Chicago coincidental minor is an obvious call, D Sedin was clearly interference, the Nashville whistle was a classic lost puck (not a bad call), the 04 "puck was in" call wasn't strong enough to overturn the call on the ice. (and I'm a die hard flames fan)
@zaizoesclashing71037 ай бұрын
Man i miss Cherry 🍒
@aundruschkaivanhoe13474 ай бұрын
Price wrapped himself up with another player. No goaltender interference. Good call refs!
@Aidan_minotti7 ай бұрын
Man I love the shanghei sharks
@Jemmer75Ай бұрын
5:57 Don Cherry decides to flip the TV audience the bird.
@R41denn6 ай бұрын
Two words for the last clip. "No goal!" - Lindy Ruff
@BigSleepyJoeCooking8 ай бұрын
4:42 Leafs fans if you don’t like this call you have to be cheering for Vancouver. Same thing McDavid did but the league has to “protect the investment”
@jeffreycairns7678 ай бұрын
I am cheering on Vancouver
@Unknown220-l7x8 ай бұрын
@@jeffreycairns767bro they are already playing the oilers the oilers are going to win Stanley cup
The “no goal game” has lived on with us forever. The call was botched, and the rule was later changed after the controversy.
@broidfk1236 ай бұрын
so you can diss the isles but you cant talk about the 7 guys on the godamn ice for the lightning.
@andrebastian993 ай бұрын
As a Stars fan, I can recognize the bad call but at the same time I love hearing Sabres complain years later
@tonttu94fin8 ай бұрын
well, you can say these refs suck, but over half of these were good calls..
@nopenopenope1318 ай бұрын
At 0:22 - It looks to me like the ref was in the process of calling the double minors, in which case the whistle is blown. Neither team had to touch the puck to blow the play dead, therefore the goal couldn't have counted. My 2 cents. On the next one, with Nash running into Price, yes it looks like interference, but Price's right leg and pad may have been outside the crease when Nash hit him. The two different angles seem to show conflicting facts, which of course is not possible. 1:31 favors Price, while 1:36 favors Nash. I think this was a difficult - not an obvious - call. Certainly not a "worst call." I couldn't watch this erroneous video anymore after the claim of a "soft ass" penalty at 3:17. I think you're way off the mark, and the title "WORST Calls in NHL History" is clickbait.
@Kartracer6Ай бұрын
The problem with the double minor call was the Hawks player wasn't doing anything, he was getting punched. If anything it should be a hawks pp. But really the official saw a fight and made a decision he shouldn't have and tried to justify it as a double minor. He was removed from the playoffs after this and I'm not sure he ever refs another game at all
@nopenopenope131Ай бұрын
@Kartracer6 I would agree with you and that's how it should have been called, except that this was and still is a common practice. If the ref didn't see who started it they usually take both. I can't speak for this ref, but I imagine that was his reason for the decision.
@PigeonNHL5 ай бұрын
Does he know how to pronounce Sedin
@richt4297Ай бұрын
What's worse is the announcer says it properly in the clip...like just watch the shit you post and you would know how to pronounce the names of the players in the clips.
@boblawblaw68758 ай бұрын
Educate yourself about the last play. Before the playoffs, the crease rule was updated. That was actually a good goal. Had the rule not changed before the playoffs, it would have been waived off
@davidjanssen19776 ай бұрын
Regarding the Gretzky high stick, he has a white shirt when injuring Gilmour, but when they show a clip of him scoring the game-winning goal, he has a black shirt.
@jeffreycairns7674 ай бұрын
The call was when the Kings were in their home jerseys (the white ones). The "goal" was a completely different game. Horrible editing on the video
@disneyjohn85367 ай бұрын
Where is the Vegas vs San Jose one in 2019? Not a fan of either team but Easily should be on that list. One of the worst calls ever!
@ryans4133 ай бұрын
2017 Oilers Ducks I guess you can be on top of the goalie and the goal still counts
@disneyjohn85363 ай бұрын
@ryans413 Like I have said on previous comments in other videos regarding that incident blame Nurse he caused it to happen by pushing Kessler into Talbot
@ryans4133 ай бұрын
@@disneyjohn8536 but Perry also held Talbots pad down so yea debate me all you want it was a bad missed call.
@Evan_bruce_773 ай бұрын
No it wasnt🤣🤣
@disneyjohn85363 ай бұрын
@ryans413 Talbot did reset after the Perry bump then Nurse pushed Kessler into Talbot causing goal to happen. Same game Oilers got away with a full high stick which led to a 4 on 1 rush and a goal. So calls were even that game.
@spacezach147 ай бұрын
11:46 bro the longest game was in 2023 in 4th over time between the hurricanes and panthers
@davidwaxter663 ай бұрын
1. At the time it was the longest. 2. In the finals history not just playoffs
@spacezach143 ай бұрын
@@davidwaxter66 oh
@JeanetteRuskАй бұрын
4:02 wtf is that message 😂
@Bluecatastrofee18 күн бұрын
That Gretzky one, as an LA kings fan, makes me made
@adamt.borrowmanmr.mattobei98655 ай бұрын
I mean the Calgary Flames still could’ve lost the Stanley Cup, because if they’d scored even two times from seven minutes left, because I’ve seen players score three times within one minute, in fact I seen a team score five times within 15 seconds!
@canuckftc12W13 күн бұрын
The reffing in the 2011 finals felt worse cause of the stakes, but that whole 2013 series against the sharks i think was easily the worst, most biased reffing I think ive ever seen in my lines
@psyko21o2Ай бұрын
The last two were the correct call. Seeing white is only conclusive on the overhead cam, otherwise a puck in the air can show white without being fully across the line. Hull's goal was ruled that he never lost possesion which allows him to proceed the puck into the crease, but of course you couldn't show the whole play. That last one can be hard for some people to accept that possesion doesn't require the puck to be on their stick.....that's control.
@bananian8 ай бұрын
Shiet, they about to give McD the Gretzky treatment tomorrow. 😢
@ashleyjohnson2588 ай бұрын
oh god I hope not.... but I can see it
@tommymcmenamon61247 ай бұрын
The refs are TOTALLY doing there job
@jeffreycairns7674 ай бұрын
Yes they are. They're doing exactly what Bettman has told them to do
@indigobuffaloАй бұрын
The (no) offside goal by Duchene actually has a decent explanation. There’s a rule in hockey that if the puck is played into the offensive zone by a defender, ie if you control the puck into your own end, then it negates offside. The defender on Nashville tried to intercept the pass to Duchene and sort of knocked it but didn’t stop it, and it got to Duchene anyhow. The issue is that the linesman didn’t get the right call, because the defender never met the conditions for this rule completely, but watching this clip shown in the intro to the video is completely wrong because it doesn’t even show that part of call. You see this rule come up probably 4 to 5 times a month in the NHL so you could farm clips all day long.
@markastoforoff78388 күн бұрын
Still pissed about the non call on Gretzky. Fraser was blind as a bat intentionally.
@bradvestby3 ай бұрын
The Nashville no goal was not a missed call.. that's just a butt hurt fan perspective who doesn't know the rules of hockey.
@Daniel-ne2os2 ай бұрын
At number 8 there was no goaltender interference, because it was out of the blue box and so it's the dept of the goalie
@Autshot20Ай бұрын
Gretzky's goal that is shown as the overtime winner was not the GW goal of game six. It was a goal he scored in game seven.
@chadrowland46704 күн бұрын
They were never going to call a penalty on Wayne Gretzky.