WOW! Sigma 18-35 1.8 [Sony E-Mount w/ MC-11 Adapter] Review

[@dunnadidit]

*Have you used the Sigma 18-35 1.8? Do you want to?*

[@chrisau2159]

It's a great lens! I agree for most sports it doesn't have the range but for things like CrossFit and MMA where you can get a bit closer it's amazing!

[@dunnadidit]

Cool! I can see that being useful, there it’s more kind of ups and downs and not necessarily people running across your frame as much! Thanks for the input!

[@jawaher4655]

Definitely wouldn't mind trying out this lens in the future 😁

[@dunnadidit]

I don’t blame you!

[@joehearsey4740]

Ahh I want to try it out so bad. Own the Simga 16 and 30mm on my a6300 and is so annoying to keep switching between during shoots. Thanks for the video review man! Really helped out !!

[@chrisbrockhurst]

Sigma needs to make a Sony native version of this lens. It would instantly become the best selling e mount lens out there. Sigma plzzzzzzzzzzz!!!!! Great vid Man 👊🏻

[@dunnadidit]

Haha we need to start a petition!

[@chrisbrockhurst]

Dunna Did It yes!!!!

[@kidblazer16]

Facts!! but Sigma wont do it because then people wouldn't buy the 20MM or 35MM ART they released earlier this year for Sony E mount.

[@dunnadidit]

That’s exactly what I’m thinking too... although, those are full frame lenses so there is some room there since full framers probably won’t pick this up.

[@goxukraine]

Even if they will release it, they are just going to permanently attach mc-11 adapter to lens and call it a day. Like they did with whole lineup of art e-mount lenses. They will have to design a completely different lens to make it truly native.

[@nintee9877]

I just want to say thank you for responding to these newer comments even though this video is almost a year old. Pure dedication!

[@dunnadidit]

Thanks for saying that! Merry Christmas!

[@frankfeng2701]

The beauty of this lens is not only its IQ, but also its adaptability to many mirrorless mounts that don't have a fast f/1.8 zoom.

[@dunnadidit]

Yeah its pretty clutch for that f1.8 on a zoom lens.

[@StreetsOfVancouverChannel]

My prognostication: Sigma will release a version 2 of this within the next six months and it will also be available in E-mount and will have a much quieter AF motor.

[@dunnadidit]

Yeah we can hope and wish! But they just announced a bunch of new stuff and guess what... none of the zooms have e mount... what the heck sigma!

[@SarasTech]

Hey man, how are you? For this test, did you use the EF version of this lens, with the canon to sony adapter, or did you use the Sony A mount with the A to E adapter? I have this lens with a Canon 80D, but I'm about to buy the a6400, and I'd love to keep this lens, but I want to know what works best and decide around that (EF to E, or A to E).

[@dunnadidit]

I used the EF version with the mc11 elf adapter. Hope that helps!

[@SarasTech]

@@dunnadidit it does. Thanks for answering. And what would you do for yout KZbin channel, would you keep the 18-35 with the adapter, or would you sell it and go for both, the 16mm 1.4, and the 30mm 1.4? This is for my KZbin channel too: it's a tech related channel, with lots of product b-roll.

[@darksideemt]

Would definitely consider it down the road if they came out with an e-mount. Until then I will stick to my 16 & 30mm. Great vid

[@dunnadidit]

That’s totally where I’m at too! Thanks for watching!

[@chernobaev]

Hi man! Thanks you for video. What you use now sigma 16+30 or 18-35? I want to make minimalistic and versatile kit. And shoot run and gun, but cinimatic. Also on gimbal. So think, that better 🤔

[@dunnadidit]

I use the 16 & 30, the 18-35 was just on loan for the review. But it had a few too many drawbacks after adapting so I still prefer the 16 and 30

[@chernobaev]

Dunna Did It understand! Thank you for answer

[@dunnadidit]

My pleasure!

[@andresjulianvelez4628]

Amazing combo. Do you test versus 18-50 2.8? Thanks

[@devonxscott]

Great video! I own this lens and use it every single time I pick up my camera. Not sure if anyone asked before, but if you don't mind...what lens/camera combo you used to shoot this video? I love the look!

[@dunnadidit]

Nice! I shot the video with the a6500 and the sigma 16mm f1.4 for the most part 😁

[@mjaymilkyway]

Owning one of this atm. It REALLY helps take my overall knowlegde about fotography to the next level, specially when dealing with autofocus problems.

[@dunnadidit]

Haha I hear that for sure! I feel like my manual focus skills got stepped up when I had it!

[@qtben17]

I had it before, excellent optics even at 1.8 but this sony combo is heavy. It is front heavy making it unbalanced for zhiyun crane (version 1) , tho havent tested with crane 2 since i sold this lens already. The af motor is loud, every ticking noise is caught by on-board mic. Sigma 16 or 30 is the more fit lens for a6000/6300/6500, make it daily casual use or gimbal work. This 18-35 is best for tripod

[@dunnadidit]

Great input! Thanks Ben!

[@austindrake5527]

do you know if there is any other/better converters for this setup. i just bought an 18-35 A mount for my A6300 and now can’t decide on a converter? Also, do you still shoot with it and how are you liking it now that you’ve used it for a while? thanks man!

[@dunnadidit]

Not that I’m aware of, I think the mc-11 is supposed to be the best one. Unfortunately I was just borrowing this from sigma Canada for the review so I don’t still have it.

[@MassimoSantiniHelymax]

i used this lens for years on the 80D canon...i ever loved it. Now i am a professionist and use it in video on the sony 6400!!!

[@dunnadidit]

That’s awesome!

[@knok2222]

Looking at this for a std zoom on my 6400 w/mc11. Whats your take on the AF issues?

[@jacklawson2597]

Did you find the lack of stabilisation in video an issue with the a6400? I'm stuck between this or the A7ii

[@knok2222]

@@jacklawson2597 I mean, yes, for handheld video even at super wide FoV its shaky and I wouldn't use it ever. 6400 requires gimbal/fluid head for use without any stabilization. That said, with a decent OSS lens its manageable. But none of my sigmas do that sort of fancy stuff.

[@jacklawson2597]

@@knok2222 Yea this what I worry about I may I think i might splash out a bit of the a6600, although I lose out on some of the full frame gmaster lenses I think they can still work for video on a aps-c.

[@vuongngo9264]

Love that lens, the rendering is soo good used it on a canon. in the sony ecosystem try it on a a7III because of the AF in crop mode. still useable at 35mm in super 35

[@dunnadidit]

Yeah it's so beautiful hey! When I finally pull the trigger on full frame I'll have to try it again!

[@majorpayne0195]

Just purchased this lens last week brand new to replaced my Sigma 17-50 f2.8. Love the lens much sharper than my former Sigma 17-50 f2.8.

[@EliseoWay]

I got this lens and also got the MC-11 adapter. The adapter fits my camera body Sony ZV-E10 but the lens does not fit the adapter. I use a Sony E mount and the MC-11 adapter says Canon EF-E. Is there another adapter that works???

[@piffsburgh6ix]

Would this sigma lens and adapter be good for shooting hip hop music videos?

[@dunnadidit]

Lots of people use it for that!

[@piffsburgh6ix]

@@dunnadidit yeah ive been searching videos all day but one more thing Dunna, would u recommend the sigma lens 18-35mm or the 18-35mm canon lens for my sony a6300?

[@SynysterNick]

This is still my dream lens, but I decided to only buy it if they make an e-mount version of it. I’m getting the 16 and 30 1.4 instead. Tough to have to change lenses, but they’re e-mount from the box!

[@dunnadidit]

That’s exactly where I’m at right now! I have both of them and love them, it would be nice to have this lens and all the awesomeness that comes with it but you also lose a bunch too.

[@boldyo]

Just get an extra used A6000 body for $3-400 and you won't have to change lenses and total weight might even be less.

[@dunnadidit]

Lol I have an extra a6500 and I definitely do this sometimes, sling up two cameras. I need to get one of those dual holster looking camera straps.

[@boldyo]

If you are going to use a holster, I would use a single along with the 18-35 and become the Dirty Harry photographer. "I know what you're thinking...have I used up 9/10 battery life or 10. But being that this is a Sigma 18-35 1.8, the most powerful lens ever made and could easily knock your head shot off with just one click, you have to ask yourself one question - Do I feel lucky...well do ya, Punk!" Actually this could be a fun script for your next video ;-)

[@dunnadidit]

This comment is the best ☝️ I need that clip haha.

[@neilcameron434]

If sigma made a phone it would have the best screen ever, it would be 2 inches thick and weight 1kg

[@dunnadidit]

LOL!

[@LeviVentura]

HEYYY THAT WAS MY QUESTION!!!!! LITTTT! Anyway I vlog daily with this lens and after asking the question I saw that turning the autofocus speed I think it was to the lowest setting can help the noise just a bit, it's not super quiet but it does seem like it helped.

[@dunnadidit]

Haha you’ve officially made it lol! Thanks for the question! And thanks for the potential help. I’ve already sent the lens back to sigma, otherwise I’d test that out. But hopefully some other people get some help from it!

[@YoungBlaze]

how can we get rid of the CRITTER SOUND when it auto focus lmao!

[@dunnadidit]

We need to ask Chris Hau how to get the bugs out of lenses I guess!?!

[@JonBear]

Been following you on Insta for a while but never checked your youtube. You're killing it brother!

[@dunnadidit]

Thanks Jon! I really appreciate you making your way over!

[@gesireci]

My next lens: 16mm 1.4 or 18-35 1.8? I was going to buy the 16mm, but now that i have watched this video im not sure. I have a sony a6300 with the kit lens, so i have a zoom lens but... the 18-35 so nicee. What do you guys think?

[@boxedmilk]

Build quality, functions, sharpness are far superior on the 18-35 1.8 versus the 16-50 kit. Sell your 16-50, get this and a 50mm and you're good to go.

[@dunnadidit]

This thing is definitely a great lens! Just have to decide if you can get around the couple drawbacks.

[@VictorLaforteza]

18-35 its one of the best versatile lens for crop sensors.

[@EwanLim]

I own both lenses and I tend to use the 18-35 f1.8 when I'm going handheld. I only take out the 16mm when i need to use a gimbal.

[@johnconnor8612]

@@EwanLim buy if u re using gimbal, would you put 18-35 ? is it work?

[@mohsin_sait]

Even if they make it for E mount they're just gonna fuse an MC 11 to the bottom like they did with the other Art lenses. I still think our best bet for zoom low aperture lens is a Sigma 16mm with clearimage zoom till 32mm.

[@dunnadidit]

But from what people are saying, the af and noise is better on those other “fused” lenses haha. That’s a great call with the 16 though!

[@joshua4578]

I've taken some of my favorite photos with this lens. Having carried this lens with me around the US, Europe, and Africa, I can say that you touched on all the pros and cons of this lens. I would not hesitate to buy it again because it can truly capture some amazing images.

[@dunnadidit]

That’s awesome! It really is a great lens, you just have to decide whether you’re willing to work through the fallbacks. Thanks for your input! Cheers!

[@이웃집고양이루루]

If you have to choose between Sigma Art 18-35 f1.8 DC HSM and Canon EF 24-70mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens for Canon 80D, what would you choose and why? mainly for portrait, landscape, buildings and just everyday-stuffs.

[@dunnadidit]

18-35 all day, that lens is so sharp and awesome and on apsc cameras like the 80D, that focal length will be better for landscape too.

[@MarkHoltze]

YOU LOATH MANUAL FOCUSING!?!?!?!?!? I'M SHOCKED. Sorry for the all caps, but I'M SHOCKED! I have no idea what it is I like about it. Probably video background, never ever ever ever liked manual focusing for moving pictures, ever. Having shot so much stuff over my days I suspect that's it. I'll admit that my patience for manual focusing isn't nearly as strong when shooting stills, especially with people involved (keeping them waiting longer than they need to when shooting wide open I just don't like doing). Probably why i don't love shooting portrait photography as much eheh. Great review man, the clean shave look works for you as well.

[@dunnadidit]

Hahahaha! I knew you could comment on that! I think it has to do with the fact that I got into this stuff at a time when autofocus was actually really good, and the feel of manual focus on newer lenses sucks. And because I almost exclusively film myself haha. But then this experience was great so maybe it’s just the lenses I’ve been using. Thanks brother!

[@MarkHoltze]

Ya the manual focus on some lenses is awful I can fully agree there. Also shooting self, manual REQUIRED GO! Although I'm going to try shooting myself on a vintage manual and see how that goes. I've always wanted to shoot one video 100% on vintage. My last one was ALL vintage except my on camera stuff...so I'm getting a bit closer to that goal. Happy Monday man!

[@dunnadidit]

Actually funny enough, that little sequence that I did for Lucy was 100% manual focus, cause I was too lazy to use an external mic lol. And my coffee sequence in my last video too. So it all comes down to the lens(and being forced into it) Haha happy Monday dude!

[@josefkhalifeh4663]

Really good video. I picked up my sigma 18-35mm with the MC-11 adapter for about ~ $700 on craigslist. Does anyone know if the Sigma 50-100mm is as sharp as the 18-35mm?

[@joseallende8046]

Yes, the 50-100 is just as sharp! The 18-35 and 50-100 are an OUTSTANDING combo for APC-S. I would argue that I notice the sharpness more on the 50-100 since it's a portrait length lens so most of the images I've taken with it have been close up shots. While pixel peeping you can count the hairs on your subjects face. I was originally using them with my Canon 80D. On the canon body I had to spend some time micro adjusting the focus using the USB dock. Sharp! However later I upgraded to an A7RIII and sold my Canon to help pay for it. However, I kept my Sigma APC-S lenses as I built up my FF primes collection. I found that the Sigma EF mount lenses actually focused much better on the Sony body using the MC-11 than it did on the Canon. The A7RIII autofocus is kick ass. So now that I built up my FF lens collection (mostly Sigma Art primes) I was planning to sell off my 18-35 and 50-100. However, I haven't done it yet. Using a zoom is just soooo convenient and I'm finding that the A7RIII in crop mode with these lenses produce some beautiful images. In all honesty I could have saved a ton of money and just got an a6500 with the 18-35 and 50-100 and been happy. But I splurged and got the A7RIII - because why not. :-) I love the Sigma Arts. Some amazing image quality. I use FF primes when I want the absolute best quality images or when I feel like being a student of photography. Then us my zooms for casual shots or when I'm lazy and don't mind 18MP images.

[@simplyclean4907]

For sony a6400 which one would be better for photography sigma 18-35mm 1.8 or sigma 35mm 1.4

[@dunnadidit]

I’d go with the 18-35 probably for the versatility of it.

[@kdbmichael]

Is it still worth buying this lens for my a6300?

[@dunnadidit]

Thats a tough one... I wouldn't though.

[@Bru946]

Dunna Did It why not?

[@kdbmichael]

@@dunnadidit What would you recommend for Client Video work?

[@CarlosRomero-fn5xl]

Hello Dunna, I'm about to buy my sony a6500 and my usual dilemma is do I buy sigma 18-35 or sony 18-105? I have a Yognuo 35mm lens for Canon but I could use it with the Sony adapter, but I hope you help me choose the best option. Many greetings from Peru. pd: work on wedding videos, events, photography and corporate videos

[@dunnadidit]

Honestly, at this point, I think I would suggest the 18-105 first until sigma makes a native e-mount version of the 18-35. The sigma is a beautiful lens but I wouldn't want it to be my only or my main lens. I would buy it as a specialty lens for specific situations where I could take my time with focus.

[@binizymberajj]

5 years later and still no E mount 😢😢😢😢😢😢😢

[@hohoho9939]

check new sigma 28-45 f1.8

[@mauriciotraveller]

Thanks for the video Dunna! I’m from Brazil and I’m thinking about buying a a6500 but still in doubt about buying the 16mm and 30mm or the 18-35mm. I’ll do both photography and videography. But I think that I’m going to the 16 and 30! Congrats for the video and keep doing this awesome job! 👊🏻🎥📸

[@dunnadidit]

Thanks for watching and greetings from Canada 🇨🇦! Yeah I know it’s a hard choice, I’m very happy with my 16 and 30mm for now and hopefully they do an e mount version of this lens some day!

[@mauriciotraveller]

Yeah, it would be great if Sigma do the e mount version of this lens! But until then, no big problem in switching between the 16mm and 30mm sometimes when we need! haha

[@dunnadidit]

Someone brought up a good point that with clear image zoom you can go 16-32 with the 16mm too!

[@mauriciotraveller]

Dunna Did It that’s true. Is not exactly a 32mm but it works! 😄

[@dunnadidit]

😁😁👍

[@jayvansanten1319]

I use this on the Sigma SD1M -- No AF noise without an adapter and AF is snappy and pretty accurate -- and it functions spectacularly on the Foveon sensor. Thanks for the review on the Sony with the adapter -- may be used on my Sony bodies...

[@YoungBlaze]

dont know if you explained but what lighting set up are you using ?

[@dunnadidit]

Literally writing my script for that video right now 😉 should be up in a couple weeks.

[@YoungBlaze]

@@dunnadidit cool! I was gonna say i bought a aperture 120d but then i also bought a Godox sl60w for like 120 bucks and it damn near rivals the 120d! May wanna check it out, bowens mount everything !

[@dunnadidit]

I’ve looked at it before actually, but I don’t think I could get it in Canada?

[@YoungBlaze]

@@dunnadidit damn that sucks i got it off ebay

[@dunnadidit]

I’ll keep my eyes open!

[@emilianocalvi1118]

I proudly own the Nikon version. This lens is the only reason that keeps me from switching to mirrorless. Build quality, sharpness, constant f1.8 aperture, 24-70 (ish) f2.8 fullframe equivalent: the best lens for the APS-C system so far. Please Sigma release a native E-mount version.

[@dunnadidit]

I totally hear you! We need an e mount version!!

[@chrisjames7489]

It's not anywhere near 24-70ish. It's 28-53mm... 24 is significantly wider and 70 decently more telephoto

[@emilianocalvi1118]

Sigma clearly had the 24-70 2.8 in mind when designing this lens. There is no other lens in the APS-C system that can compete with a 24-70 2.8 on fullframe. Something like a 16-45 1.8 would have been much closer yet significatively heavier (just like a 24-70 2.8 if not even more).

[@chrisjames7489]

@@emilianocalvi1118 I would disagree, Sigma set out to create a 3prime zoom. 28,34,50. All normal to normal wide focal lengths. They made this compromise to get 2.8 equiv dof FF; but this lens has no where near the versatility of a 24-70. Looks at tamrons 28-75 2.8 for Sony FE mount and see a similar lens at a similar price, except it gets the full tele end. 24mm is a big deal to give up

[@emilianocalvi1118]

@Chris I’m not saying this lens is perfect (no stabilization, no weather sealing, and yes limited focal range), but I think it’s the best compromise for APS-C. Of course the 24-70 on FF has many advantages, but the FF setup is really expensive. Sigma is trying to revitalize the APS-C with the 18-35, 50-100 and E-mount primes (16/30/56), something you will never see from Canon/Nikon/Sony because they sell their FF lenses hoping you will switch to an expensive FF camera in the future.

[@imnotmark3053]

Use a full frame camera like the a7 series I would suggest a7ii+ since it has 5 axis image stabilization and pair it with mc 11 adapt. Use aps c mode 18mm is about 24mm in full frame it’s not that wide.

[@dunnadidit]

I was using the a6500 which is a crop camera with 5 axis ibis. So I was getting to use the whole sensor. Maybe I’m not sure what you’re suggesting other than me buying a new camera lol

[@enricovezzu]

Hey man just a question: my lens dropped on the floor but fortunately, did not brake. The question is: the focus wheel rotate endless also in yours? thank you

[@dunnadidit]

Mine was just a loaner so I don't have it anymore but if I remember correctly, it rotated endlessly but had little click feeling when it hit the end of the focus range.

[@Android4lifeSahil]

I'm so confused to buy a new lens for me a6400, i need that only which works perfectly and sigma trio is a hassle specially when you have to balance everything again. Btw i have an option to grab canon 90d or m6 mark 2 by exchanging my a6400 and paying the extra, do you think i should do that and then get this lens?

[@dunnadidit]

I wouldn’t personally change systems just to get a specific lens.

[@Android4lifeSahil]

@@dunnadidit i do understand that but the thing is that a6400 didn't belong to me anyhow. I do have experience with it but which should i get now for professional work, a6400 or 90d and btw how's the Tamron 17-28 f2.8g for sony? I do have alot of gimbal work and switching lenses becomes so difficult

[@urbansolo]

I will try my luck and ask , i had canon 250d with sigma 18 35mm 1.8 , got my self a7iii with 24 70 2.8 recently and did some shooting with my new gear but for some reason if looks like my old setup produces sharper better colours pictures ... is it me because i got use to canon or do i have to play around with my settings.. i would really appreciate some help

[@dunnadidit]

The sigma 18-35 is a ridiculously sharp lens. That said, it probably has something to do with being used to the look of your old setup.

[@urbansolo]

@@dunnadidit WOW you replied lol thank you! yeah its probably that haha but getting my self a 85mm 1.4 art sigma for street and portrait photography. I love 18-35 on my old cropped sensor but since sigmas do not have e mount on 18 35 I will get 14 -24 in near future :P

[@RafaelPortoMediaServices]

How would you say this compares to the more expensive 16-55 2.8 G that came out recently ?

[@dunnadidit]

I would definitely go with the Sony lens just for the fact that you don’t need an adapter and it’s got all the new bells and whistles. It’s a killer lens.

[@jochen39415]

Can you test the 50-100 1.8?

[@dunnadidit]

I’ll look into it!! Thanks for the suggestion!

[@swashy8933]

Yeah this is like the number one lens after kit for prosumers. Everyone knows it. Especially for Apsc

[@dunnadidit]

Totally

[@byalyv]

Hi, is it still worth buying this lens for a A6000? I recently started my channel and I’m trying to improve the quality of my videos. Thanks in advance!

[@dunnadidit]

I would say you’re better off with something that doesn’t require an adaptor. Check out the sigma 16mm f1.4 or sigma 30mm f1.4.

[@byalyv]

@@dunnadidit thank you for your response! I will check those out.

[@MohondhaY]

WOW!, Those are some really really good edits! Love the pics.

[@dunnadidit]

Thanks so much!

[@jamestaylor7045]

so basically all the adapters dont actually AF properly lol. fuck

[@dunnadidit]

... yeah pretty much ;(

[@Princeton_James]

I still really like my Canon gear although i'm slowly beginning to part with it. There is no question that cameras like the a7iii and fujifilm are destroying dslrs

[@dunnadidit]

Totally agreed! This is a canon mount lens though. So if you wanted to check it out for now you could!

[@tylermanning4842]

Hey, I’m looking at purchasing this lens and getting rid of my 18-105. I do mostly video work but would you recommend this? Idk I catch myself in low light conditions sometimes and it’s not so great. I also have a sigma 30mm but the 18-35 might take its place. HELP!

[@dunnadidit]

I found this lens not bad for video.. the two things are that autofocus is a bunch slower than the 18-105 and it’s a lot louder. So if you use an on camera shotgun microphone and autofocus, I don’t suggest it. That being said, it does help in low light and the image quality is fantastic.

[@spidersav]

So the sigma 18 35 f 1.8 or the Sony 18 105 f 4 Do a comparison 💯 The videos we shoot highly rely on auto focus so the only lenses I have are Sony with my a6500.. Good things about the 18 to 105 Makes no auto focus noise Therefore you can use a rode mic for example 18 to 105 is quite a large zoom range Light weight Not expensive by any means (camera gear in general is expensive) Has 2 zoom options, the ring and the automatic gradual switch (I don't know the name for that) Fits in most pockets Rugged design, can handle basic mistakes Constant f4 aperture (can be at f4 at any. M even 105mm The zoom happens in camera, so it can be used on steady cams etc The bad of this lense F4 aperture isn't amazing in low light Bokeh is not better than the Sony 35mm but it's not too far off, the problem is how far you have to be from the subject Can't properly use the flash on the camera, because it casts a shadow on the lense (large lense, akward flash combo) you should buy a good flash anyway Refocusing after fast manual zoom, quite a lot of hunting for focus No grip on the rings Manual focus seems annoying because of the smoothness of the ring Verdict, amazing lense, however it isn't the sharpest or a Bokeh king and you'll probably need another f1. 8 or lower lense If you plan on using this for photography, I'm sure you can find something sharper or with a silkier Bokeh, but probably not at the same price. This thing is a video beast.

[@dunnadidit]

Man, if I still had the 18-35 I would for sure! Maybe I’ll see if I can get it back.

[@spidersav]

@@dunnadidit thank. You

[@dunnadidit]

Yeah what you said sounds very similar to what I said in my review of the 18-105 as well.

[@ramonluna4422]

Hi Dunna thanks for the review, Got excite when I saw the title, I was hoping to have two in one, but I guess I’ll get the 30mm, I already have the 16mm, and carry that extra lense. Thanks again you always have great reviews!!!

[@dunnadidit]

Hey Ramon! Thanks for watching! Yeah that’s kind of what I was hoping for too lol! I thought maybe I could sell my 16 and 30 and just have this but until they make an e mount version it seems like I’ll be keeping those ones (which are fantastic so I’m happy lol)

[@TuanNguyen-ks5dw]

@@dunnadidit But the 16mm and 30mm are the non art version. Do you think have some differents between art and non art version?

[@dunnadidit]

The art versions are made for full frame cameras. So they are going to be bigger, and heavier and a lot more expensive. That being said, they may also perform better (on full frame cameras)

[@mirrekku]

Probably gonna be better off buying a used 7d instead of the adapter 😂😂

[@dunnadidit]

Hahaha

[@TypicalBambi]

For anyone considering to buy this lens, I have it and use it on my Canon 750d, best lens I used, money well spent.

[@dunnadidit]

I would totally agree if you’re shooting canon apsc, this lens is basically a no brainer. Not quite the same with an adapter for other systems but still good nonetheless

[@yannisd.m.5019]

This lens is quite heavy. Does it stress the mount of the camera, especially when use Grad filters?

[@dunnadidit]

Interesting question. When I had it I didn’t notice any problem but maybe over time.

[@pitoms]

An update, I've had this combo since 2016. The metal ring mount on the a6300 is loose and I probably need to get it repaired. There's enough movement to cause focusing issues

[@nielskistrup8231]

When the Sony camera was mounted on a tripod, did it seam like the weight of the 18-35 was putting too much stress either on the MC-11 or camera lens mount?

[@dunnadidit]

I wouldn’t say too much stress but it’s pretty front heavy.

[@nielskistrup8231]

Know too well how heavy from when I rented it for the Nikon D7100. Being paranoid about damaging my equipment, will try to approaches: Lens collar for the 18-35, and a tripod mount for the MC-11 made by a company called SmallRig. See that lens as always being used w. the tripod.

[@_hold_the_line_]

You should add the crop factor for the 1 over focal length calculation. On 18 it will be 30th of a second minimum.

[@dunnadidit]

Very true,! It is the reciprocal of the “effective” focal length. I suppose I could have been more clear there. Thanks for bringing that up!

[@turisma_music]

Hey! Will this lens work with other adapters, like the one from Nikon LA-FE1? I have my old Nikon D7200 with some lenses, including Sigma 18-35 1.8, and I would like to know if I can use them on my Sony a7III. MC-11 supports only Sigma lenses, but I'd love to use those Nikkors.

[@VictorLaforteza]

you beat me to making this video!!! noooooo hahahah always love your reviews though to the point and fun!

[@dunnadidit]

Haha sorry Victor! I’m sure you can still do it lol! Thanks for watching I’m glad you enjoy!

[@juancrg03]

As soon as photographer start complaining about weight -'NEXT" Photographer complain so much about weight!! Framers can hold a nail gun for a full day!!

[@lovezachee]

good review, I want to ask you I have a sigma 18-35mm and I bought the Sigma SA-A e-mount adapter and it does not work I think it is specific for my sigma 18-35mm lens that has logo A let me know which adapter works for me

[@nikosufray]

Hello! I have the same equipment as you with a RONIN SC and I can't stabilize it, since all its weight goes forward. My query is which Gimbal to buy? :(

[@ianscottcastillo7709]

I have a canon t6i ASPC 24 MP Would the Sony A7IV in crop mode for photos be better than the old camera I have now?? I plan to get Sony glass but just want to use the aspc glass to hold me over for the mean time! Thanks

[@skeasel6128]

Sooooo. I have come across this. I picked up an 18-35 F1.8 on eBay for my BMPCC 4K. Should I pick up an MC11 adapter and use my A6600 for concert photography before picking up an A7iii? Thanks for what you do.

[@dunnadidit]

Yeah I mean... if you already have the lens, I would say go for it! You’ll be able to use the adapter once you get an a7iii too. It will just be in crop mode.

[@nERbGG]

Whats your comment with it compared to the Sigma 35 1.4 art? Which one would you choose?

[@dunnadidit]

Unfortunately I’ve never personally used the 35mm but I can see the native mount being an advantage. I would probably still choose the 18-35 for two reasons. 1. The 18-35 was made for apsc so you’re getting full quality. The 35 is Full Frame glass so you’re not getting the full quality of it. 2. The versatility of having a zoom lens is awesome.

[@nERbGG]

@@dunnadidit Good point. Tho the 35 should still work fine with an apsc, im just torn between the 2. No doubt that the 18-35 is very nice due to its versatility of having a zoom lens with a very nice aperture, i just cant really decide if i should get it knowing that in the long run ill eventually move to a full frame body and i can no longer use it due to its terrible vignetting issue on full frames.

[@dunnadidit]

Yeah, if you’re going to go full frame and you want to start building your lens collection now, that makes sense.

[@Latiosx123]

I will sell all my lens and have this mounts forever on my a6400 if they make a native one. I have the sony kit lens, 30mm sigma, 50mm sony and 55210mm. All these to cover the range.

[@anthonyyounghusband5917]

I have a love hate relationship with this lens. I love the sharpness, omg there is something about the colour mmmmm but but but the auto focus with the 80D is so unrealisable. It’s my landscape lens. One thing that wasn’t mentioned. The lens is pretty much useless for focus stacking an image due to focus breathing. The recent software update to the lens didn’t improve the focusing issues BUT I still love this lens. It’s one of those so good/ bad relationships

[@dunnadidit]

Very interesting!! Thanks for bringing that up anthony. I don’t do a lot of focus stacking stuff so I didn’t catch this!

[@alig3303]

its kindve a pain for me i bought a used perfect condition one to fit my 80d its nice to mount and use but image quality seems kindve off and less sharp which i feel it requires some calibration and focus as usual isnt the best, any suggestions?

[@dunnadidit]

That’s really odd, you may want to bring it into your camera store and have them take a look at it.

[@alig3303]

@@dunnadidit i bought it off ebay, thats the thing so i dont know which store i should pop into, but i might have a look at Sigma in Melbourne thats if they have a legit store

[@dunnadidit]

Hmmm you should be able to bring it to any store that sells sigma.

[@akylemichaelsproject9518]

Just to confirm I do need to buy a Mc-11 adapter right ? I have a Sony a6300. It’s says for Sony on the box but it won’t fit on camera smh

[@dunnadidit]

Correct. They do not make a native Sony e-mount version of this lens so you’ll need an adapter.

Thanks for this detailed review

[@no15minutecities]

another spoiled rich kid......zzzzzzzzzzz

[@dunnadidit]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA God I wish this were true. I am neither rich, nor a kid.

[@FrankNazario]

If you have a Sigma not with the native Sony mount you can send the lens to Sigma to have it converted NATIVELY to the Sony mount... Here is the direct link to Sigma.... I hope this helps native is mostly the way to go if you only run in one brand. www.sigmaphoto.com/service-support/mount-conversion-service

[@dunnadidit]

Unfortunately, this lens doesn't qualify for that. Its only certain lenses that do.

[@FrankNazario]

please check the latest list it does for sony...

[@dunnadidit]

Just checked... unfortunately there’s a big fat “X” in the Sony E-Mount category next to this lens (and all zoom lenses). Essentially, you can only convert lenses that they also make natively for that mount I think. So because they don’t make this lens with an E-Mount, you can’t convert it to e-mount. Otherwise they would sell it that way as well. Maybe you were confusing it with Sony A-Mount?

[@dunnadidit]

www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/cas/service/mcs/ Scroll halfway down and click “interchangeable lenses”

[@guilhermesalvador7628]

Hey, I have an a6300, and have this Sigma, is it worth to use has static camera? Even vloging, with all that weight?

[@Abdulisbasith]

#instagramnotificationsquad Here!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[@dunnadidit]

WOOOOOO YEEEEEAAAHHH INSTAGRAMNOTIFICATIONSQUADDDDD!

[@adrianthomas2132]

Hmm..looking at a good alternative to always switching between primes.. kinda wastes time and lose moments.. have u tested the 10 to 15 sony??? How's that againts this? I have the 16mm and 56mm.. with sony 85mm ( got it before the 56mm was released) .. looking to fill the gap between the sigmas. . But another prime.. another switch..

[@dunnadidit]

Honestly, my go to for that purpose is my 18-105 f4. It’s the best all around that I’ve found so far. Hopefully there’s some more faster lenses soon for apsc

[@adrianthomas2132]

@@dunnadidit i hope so too!!! Any thoughts on the full frame tamrom 28-75mm f2.8 on the apsc? On a separate note, The ultra wide laowa Venus Optics 9mm f2.8 looks awesome too.. ( yes.. i kinda need to get a grip and stop being gear crazy ..haha)

[@dunnadidit]

I’ve been seriously eyeing up that Tamron! It looks nice!

[@adrianthomas2132]

@@dunnadidit it a big fella.. not seen a proper review on that for apsc.. but on a full frame... looks impressive!!!

[@dunnadidit]

I’ve never actually seen it in person but I wondered how big it was. Gotta get one and do a review!

[@01caramell]

Just got a new camera (a6600) and I do a lot of video. On a gimbal specifically. Would you recommend this? I do not own any lenses for Sony yet

[@dunnadidit]

Only if you are going to manual focus it.

[@nikmiddelman]

i got the mc-11 and sigma 18-35 but it seems that my autofocus doesnt work. anyone know why and how?

[@Xvell]

Good vid man , big help , anyways did you used sigma usb dock for this lens?

[@dunnadidit]

Thanks! No I didn’t have the dock

[@SW-Video]

Works great on my A7iii with a Vello adapter. Good way to save a few bucks.

[@Joey.Alford]

When this comes out for emount ouuuuuu

[@dunnadidit]

TAKE MY MONEY SIGMA!!!

[@obiecolumbus1568]

You are making me fall in love with Sony camera

[@dunnadidit]

Lol! They are great!!

[@razmik803]

Having hard time deciding is it worth buying for my a6400 in pair with the Weebill S gimbal instead of sigma 16 and 30mm? How do you think, will 18-35 ballance correctly on Weebil S with a6400 and Mc-11 adapter? There's no info on youtube on that topic..

[@dunnadidit]

I think it might be a bit too heavy tbh.

[@kajyravoson1323]

Is it interesting to buy this lens with the adapter. And grab one speedbooster for my gh4? Is it possible?

[@JanRaymondCortez]

What rigcage are you using on this video?

[@dunnadidit]

It’s a smallrig cage with the wooden handle, there’s a link in the description if you want to check out my kit!

[@ezzaAU]

After you attached the Sigma lens onto the adapter, that solid green light on the adapter would stay on forever or it goes off right away??

[@laurencegr5338]

Your answers are very helpful to me lately. One more question, is it for Canon EF (EF-S) mount?

[@dunnadidit]

That’s great to hear! Yup! The one that I used was EF mount.

[@laurencegr5338]

@@dunnadidit Great. 😁

[@th-bz2vm]

This one or tamron 17-70?

[@dunnadidit]

17-70 for me. No adapter wins

[@ShavonSmith]

do think the lens combine with the camera body would be to much weight for joby 3k gorilla pod

[@ConstantinSPurcea]

You do realise that even if it zooms/focuses internally, for gimbal/steadicam shots the weight distribution changes with the focal length since glass elements move inside the barrel?! So nothing can really solve the problem of zooming/focusing on a stabiliser system.

[@dunnadidit]

Yes of course there are moving pieces internally but In my experience, with lenses that internally zoom, I don’t need to rebalance my gimbal after changing the zoom setting. Whereas when I was using the gimbal with zoom lenses that extend, I did have to rebalance.

[@mousse4444]

Hey, what happened to your brother? You know, the guy with the mustache and beard.

[@dunnadidit]

We don’t talk about him 😈

[@lanx0003]

Now you could just go get the sony 16-55 2.8 G and all the hassle you were talking about is gone.

[@dunnadidit]

BAM! wish it was 1.8 tho ;)

[@jonathant1797]

Which do you prefer between this and the sigma 16m 1.4?

[@doubledom6908]

Hey, should I buy the Sigma 18-35 or the Sigma 16mm + 30mm for my A6300?

[@dunnadidit]

Personally I’d go with the 16+30

[@gerardog8875]

Should I get this lens or tamron 24-70????? I need help lmao

[@SHEKHARRAWAT]

Hi Dunna, loved ur videos ... just wanted to know do you still love ur Sony 18-105 lens after you bought Sigma 16mm.... because ur videos got better after Sigma 16mm. i can't decide should i buy 18-105 now /// although my main purpose is Video, and the lenses which i own are Sony 50mm 1.8 & Sony 16mm 2.8.... please guide, thankyou so much love from India 🙏

[@dunnadidit]

Hey Shekhar! Thanks for the kind words! Yes I absolutely love my 18-105 still, a lot of the reason my videos got better is because I bought my Sony a6500 around the same time I got my 16mm sigma. That being said, I still use both the 16mm sigma and my 18-105 almost every day. They are both wonderful lenses. I still highly recommend it as a nice all around versatile lens!

[@johnmathew7588]

can I use Nikon version of this lens on sony e mount cameras ? will af works well? coz i have a Nikon version of this and I really want to switch to sony and i don't want to sell this beast

[@redpilldepartement9321]

You can also get rid of the autofocus noise with audio plugins in the Video editor you have. Waves has some

[@dunnadidit]

I tried that actually (I'm an audio engineer as my full time job) and generally, to get rid of the noise from the lens, I had to mangle my audio so bad that the other audio was unsalvageable afterwards.

[@redpilldepartement9321]

@@dunnadidit which plugin did you use?

[@dunnadidit]

I tried a whole bunch of em! Waves, Izotope, built in premiere ones, accusonus, all sorts!

[@resonatemusicstudio]

DAANNNGGG... That studio is lookin' good! 😏

[@resonatemusicstudio]

Oh and all that gorgeous merch too!!

[@dunnadidit]

Just the most aesthetically pleasing business known to humankind!

[@sofronio.]

if sigma gives this one a stm motor, OMG that'll be so much perfect for video shooting. Anyway it's a fantastic lens already. I'll use me wireless lav mic on that inside of rode videomic.

[@dunnadidit]

It really is a fantastic lens. And it seems only to be this noisy with the adapter for some reason, but if you have a lav, then you’re good!

[@johnmathew7588]

can I use Nikon version of this lens on sony e mount cameras ? will af works well? coz i have a Nikon version of this and I really want to switch to sony and i don't want to sell this beast

[@TravellLove]

One could simply get the sharper lighter Tamron 28-75 with full-frame for the same price and better quality

[@dunnadidit]

I tried the 28-75 on my crop bodies and the quality definitely didn't stand up to this lens. That said, I'm now trying it again on my full frame body and so far I'm liking it. That said, the 18-35 quality was so nice and I don't think I'm as blown away by the tamron.

[@des666]

Really nice review! I use this lens with A6300 and Commlite adapter and even though Eye-AF doesn’t work with this adapter and in video is only manual AF, it’s still pretty good and it works better and faster (!!) than with my old Canon 70d to be honest. I am still thinking about selling it and changing for some Sony Native lens but this video reminded me how good this lens is and I am hesitating. I’ve got also Canon’s Sigma 30mm f/1.4 lens and considering to keep one... the 30 f/1.4 has only one advantage except of light - weight. This is the only reason I don’t like this lens. It’s not easy to carry it around with you all the time :))) Still amazing lens and most likely I’m going to keep it :-)) What would you exchange Sigma 30 f/1.4 for? I am thinking 18-105 f/4 to be honest. But then I will have 18-35 covered twice and I am afraid that I will end up using 18-105 most of the time outdoors because of the weight and versality :-)

[@dunnadidit]

I absolutely love my 18-105! It’s not as sharp as some lenses but for a nice light all’s around lens it is fantastic and the images are still pretty great!

[@des666]

Dunna Did It so the question is would you exchange Sigma 30mm f/1.4 ART for Sony 18-105 or Sigma 18-35 f/1.8 ART for Sony 18-105 and kept Sigma 30 f/1.4 ? I’ve got also Canon’s 10-18mm. So that’s the third option, but it’s light and it’s wide :) I just need to exchange one of those lens (All Canon’s) to a Sony native lens :))

[@dunnadidit]

So if I understand, you want to know which one to sell off so you can get the 18-105. I would say to sell the 30mm and keep the 18-35. If you’re gonna have to use an adapter either way, you might as well keep this thing cause it’s a beast!

[@des666]

Dunna Did It Thanks! That’s what I was thinking after watching your review. Even with adapter 18-35 f/1.8 is too good (and to heavy? ;)) to throw it away. It will be sad to sell the only prime lens I currently have, but it’s the wisest choice considering the options :)

[@dunnadidit]

Yeah the 18-35 is so sharp that it basically covers you at 30mm anyway, whereas if you get rid of that then you are left with less option. 😁

[@anjoemarasigan3352]

Should i get this or the canon 24-70 2.8 version 1?

[@kian8382]

Hi Dunna can you test if the af is better on a6400/6600? Thank you.

[@dunnadidit]

They’re both great but so far I’d say the a6600 is a bit better.