Writing CPA Canada PER Reports: Levels & Examples Part 3 | PER Review by GevorgCPA

[@anerishah617]

Thank you Gevorg, I found this video extremely helpful.

[@gurpreetchahal3569]

Thanks Gevorg for the video. Make sense!. Now it is clear how important is to use right words when preparing the PERT report.

[@hussainsauce4059]

Thanks Gevorg, very useful.

[@jievw6270]

Can you give an example for FR 1 for public accountant? Thanks

[@GevorgCPA]

Here's example for FR1 for public: Your client was going through the process of separating their business into major segments and you were involved in either researching the FR requirements (IFRS 8 or ASPE 1591, 1601) or evaluating their FR needs based on stakeholders. Stakeholders can be: bank, lenders, government regulators, general public, customers, vendors etc.

[@LittleTortuga09]

i have to get started on these soon. these are really useful videos. thank you.

[@joeymitchell1262]

I am confused about the format of the technical competency portion. Should be format be in the order of below? 1) Task / explain the task, stakeholder needs, frequency of task 2) Analysis 3) Evaluate 4) Alternatives 5) Recommendation 6) Impact Should 3) Evaluate and 4) Alternative be flipped around? My understanding is we should evaluate if something is good or bad based on the analysis. And then suggest alternative to improve the situation. Lastly recommend best course of action.

[@GevorgCPA]

You're on the right track. It actually changes for every technical area a little. Generally it's: 1) Scope (ie what's your role/task) 2) Stakeholders (ie, their needs) 3) Specific example (