WTC Building 7 Collapse - 27 Angles

At 5:20 PM WTC 7 collapsed, after being set ablaze by the falling WTC 1 at 10:28 AM. The building had been completely evacuated.
For a list of video sources, see web.archive.org/web/202007011...
The final clip (which isn't counted as one of the 27) comes from: • 9/11: As It Happened -...
"9/11: As It Happened - from Brooklyn, Collapse of 7WTC"
Also the Richard Peskin video isn't counted as one of the 27, since the collapse isn't captured (seen at 7:15) However, the MSNBC clip near the end is counted even though the collapse isn't captured. In another video I synched the MSNBC video with 3 others to see where the building was in its collapse when Ashleigh and others were reacting -- • WTC Building 7 "Collap...

[@CTV911]

I'm not deleting any comments. That's KZbin's filter.

[@alwagner9722]

Just as I thought, my comment to you got deleted.

[@alwagner9722]

KZbin f@#*ing ridiculous!

[@idk-cb8di]

This video better not be taken down by yt

[@MisterMcKinney]

Why would it?

[@willgoins218]

Thanks for this comprehensive footage. The building fell in it's footprint at free fall. The 2020 University of Alaska Fairbanks report on building 7 refutes the NIST report on building fires causing complete structural failure.

[@christopherpardell4418]

No, it didn’t. I really wish people like you would stop making claims that are false. You can see the beginning of the collapse in the vertical row of windows on the rear facade that shift slightly, this is from the failure of the first column, in the middle of the building adjacent to the area where, for some reason, the design placed columns farther apart. This column started to buckle on the floor where the fire was most intense and it pulled the beams attaching it to the adjacent columns, displacing each column in turn to the rear facade, shifting the windows. That is, by the time you see the change in the window alignment, the collapse has already been going for about 4 seconds. As the dropping initial column pulls the beam connections, they drag a ring of adjacent columns out of plumb, and they buckle from the intense heat on the fire floors. As they give way, you see part of the penthouse on the roof falls down INTO the building. You can see the progressive failure cascade along the center of the building pulling the rest of the penthouse down into the center from left to right. That whole time the center columns of the building are buckling and collapsing as they are pulled off plumb by the beams. You can SEE the light inside the building as it hollows out on the interior BEFORE the exterior facade starts to drop. The front and rear facades are pulled together as they collapse, because they are being pulled by all the beam connections the the columns already buckling in the middle. The folks who wrote the report you refer to had ZERO access to the actual wreckage of the building, and zero knowledge of the actual conditions inside the building. None of the authors have much reputation in forensic engineering, and what little they had was undone by their silly, entirely unsupported report. Just because folks work in architecture, does not make them immune from believing malarkey. In point of fact, big city firefighters have ALWAYS known the steel trusses fail in long burning fires, and that claims that no steel structure has ever failed form fire alone are FALSE. There are plenty of examples of buildings built, inspired by the modern methods used on WTC buildings, that haven failed in fire. One building, which had a mix of reinforced concrete construction and steel frame construction suffered a collapse, but ONLY the portion built of steel, while the concrete section remained standing. The building failed from a combination of structural damage from falling steel. ( which knocked out dozens of beam connections on the facade facing WTC 1 and 2. ) and a long burning fire that could not be attacked, because the collapse of the towers had cut thru the water mains supply water to that entire block. As someone who designs and works with steel, I can tell you that temperatures hot enough to melt aluminum, turn steel into taffy. ( and that molten metal seen dribbling out from the towers right next to the very first column to frail? That was aluminum from the 40 TONS of aluminum from each plane that went into each building.) “Free fall” as you use it is meaningless, because the None of the buildings fell at full gravity acceleration. You can tell easily, because As the towers collapsed, and the stack of pancaking floors filled the center of the collapsing section, shearing connections to the core and perimeter columns, the perimeter columns could NOT buckle inwards because the stack of floors were in the middle. So they could only buckle outwards. The columns bent over in an arc, before breaking apart, peeling the buildings like bananas, and you can literally SEE the steel that folded over, tore loose and dropped hitting the gourd well before the progressive collapse reached the bottom.

[@mikebyrd8278]

The guy that wrote the Fairbanks report is involved in a conspiracy group. He was also paid over $300,000 for it an it doesn't mention explosives. The fire department determined hours before the building was going to collapse

[@jenniferwitchy]

Rudy said on live TV to pull 7. I remeber it and even said it again in another interview. I remeber every moment of that day and after.

[@LegoWarFims]

I think what some folks didn't realize that there was so many mis information of its collapsed. Hell even earlier reports on the FDNY dispatch that the standing buildings were endanger of collapse. WTC7’s pent house caved in and then the whole building fell foward. You need to imagine all the wtc buildings. 1&2 were built with the same material, while WTC 3, and 7 were built on different structures and probably different steel. But hey take my two cents.

[@eh1702]

The Dunning Kruger kids latched on to 9/11 about a decade ago. These are people so unaccustomed to thought that they literally believe: “I saw no youtube video = did not happen.” Not that they can even sit and watch the videos they do come across the, under. Just gape vacantly and fail to notice what they literally are staring at. These are people who barely scraped through community college, but imagine the world as just about their size; so if they are in the least puzzled about a thing - that thing must be “odd”, “weird”, “strange”, suspicious, unexplained, only explainable by nefarious plots. They can’t believe they just don’t know stuff. Literally, they cannot believe their own ignorance even exists.

[@sharkinthepark]

Yes, I think what confuses people is that all the camera angles are mostly from the side which was not damaged by the WTC1 & WTC2 collapses, so it looks less damaged than it really was. On some other angles you can just about see, through the smoke, that WTC7 was gashed from top to bottom by the falling twin towers. So it's really no mystery that WTC7 was fatally damaged. It was only a matter of time before it too collapsed. It was on fire on pretty much every floor, by the looks of where the smoke is coming out. As for WTC7's actual collapse, you can see the square block on the top of WTC7 collapse first, and the internal damage which that caused is hidden from view by the facade which remained standing initially. Then there's a 6-7 second pause before the rest of it collapses like a house of cards. It's not hard to see how the initial square block collapse knocked out a load of supporting columns at floor level, which took the rest of it down. There really is no mystery about this.

[@mizaqenyad4269]

I think its crazy people DONT question the collapse of this building or the towers. In the government's own investigation report which is publicly available building 7 collapsed due to office fires. Thats it. Thats what they say. That is utterly insane, it is completely physically impossible. Domt take my word for it do some research. Countless engineers, demolition experts and architects will tell you these towers were clearly controlled demolitions. Never before in history have steel framed skyscrapers imploded on themselves due to fire, and never again has it been seen. Many similar structures have burned for far far longer without collapse.

[@brandishaccount5439]

​​@@eh1702Who are you referring to, the WTC7 Truthers or the WTC7 conspiracy skeptics (I am the latter tbh)?

[@owlhater270]

"Pull it" - Larry Silverstein..... Financially benefited off of 9/11

[@erebus6786]

Whats the source for the last video?

[@CTV911]

Here you go -- kzbin.info/www/bejne/fHiQhp6AZquAirc

[@nickhoagland6568]

Office fires

[@RebuttalRecords]

I remember watching the news that day and at some point a reporter stated "they are going to PULL building 7", which means they deliberately demolished it.

[@tortoiseguy283]

Why was that video taken down and nobody's talking about after 2 decades? What are they trying to hide?

[@pascaloger5672]

Perso, celui-ci le numéro 7 je savais mais je ne l'avais jamais vu tomber 😱😱😱

[@laislabella]

Así es, ese día cayeron 3 torres, derribadas con solo dos aviones. Raro verdad?

[@pascaloger5672]

@@laislabella quizaz vibrations

[@idk-cb8di]

@@laislabellaIt’s not about the planes, it’s about engineering and how it collapsed

[@eh1702]

@@laislabella Weird to extremely stupid people. Everyone else saw the third building pelted by burning debris from above and then sledged into its ground floor by the collapse. And everyone else knows the towers fell into the SHARED BASEMENT LEVELS. Debris so hot that steel girders that fell in there were winched out a week later - still red hot.

[@eh1702]

@@laislabella Please learn some basics of rational thought. Just because YOU PERSONALLY are ignorant of a thing, does not make that thing a weird thing. It makes it something UNKNOWN to YOU. To people who know about the timeline of events, who know about the overall plan of the complex and how all the buildings were joined underground, to people who saw the burning debris that assaulted these buildings repeatedly both from above and by ramming into it and by slicing one of the building down the back, to people who have WATCHED the many different videos of these events instead of vacantly gaping at them with the attention-span of a fles - no, it’s not weird, it is bleeding obvious.

[@gcbarre]

Say goodbye to the ENRON files.

[@Oldschooldan1]

Skilling was sentenced to 14 years and Lay is dead. Apparently there was enough evidence. Maybe, just maybe they didn't keep their records in wtc7.

[@horseradish4046]

Questions for all the schizos: how does someone rig a building for a controlled demolition while it's an active inferno? 0:04 what kind of a controlled demolition starts at the top of the building and slowly spreads outward? 2:18 what is the political purpose of demolishing some smaller building after 2 massive skyscrapers already fell?

[@owlhater270]

Probably if you spent time researching..... Then you would have your question answered.

[@horseradish4046]

@@owlhater270 "I don't know." got it, thanks

[@jesusleon3774]

@@horseradish4046 You come across as the guy that believes and accept anything the media/government shoves down your throat 😂😂

[@horseradish4046]

@@jesusleon3774 I'm well aware of the media and government constantly lying, that's not proof of anything. If the media tells you the Earth is a globe that doesn't mean the Earth is flat. But you blindly follow whatever some online schizos tell you like sheep. Anyway, I see you still have no answers to my questions. Concession accepted, thanks.

[@fuwa9616]

@@horseradish4046 You govshils are so transparent, your playlists don't feel natural, and you somehow manage to comment on every video with this subject. Good to see my taxdollars at work.

[@CaymanIslandsCatWalks]

Why all the recent 911 vids?

[@CTV911]

From me or just in general on KZbin?

[@MrKoenig1985]

_"At 5:20 PM WTC 7 collapsed, after being set ablaze by the falling WTC 1 at 10:28 AM."_ So the official story, i.a. ignoring the question of why the first fires did appear visible about 90 minutes later. Maybe they took a long coffee break first...

[@CTV911]

I didn't know that. Anyway, I noticed your WTC 7 playlist has some WTC 2 and WTC 1 videos: kzbin.info/aero/PLT6H-ZDVDpphvWFKL1Oc-9wPMC117M1lk

[@MrKoenig1985]

@@CTV911 I've written a response two days ago and it was removed. I don't know why. There were no links or "buzzwords" included.

[@eh1702]

Oh, grow up. You people go to each different video and act like none of the others exist. You can SEE those buildings being avalanched by hundreds of tons of debris, not even just on top but sledging into them, even when WTC2 collapsed. And you can see that raised pedestrian bridge that crossed the street being rammed into one. There were FIVE BASEMENT LEVELS between all seven buildings: what do you think happened when a million tons of burning garbage was forced into the basements. There are loads of videos showing fires in their parking garages and everything. And one if them already broken down the back like a karate-chopped layer cake. They were burned out because WTC2 took the water supply as well as a couple of hundred firefighters and even the FDNY staging/command area out. You people are infantile.

[@eh1702]

What is wrong with this statement? “I personally haven’t seen a video on the internet where fire is visible until 90 minutes later, therefore there was no fire until 90 minutes later. WhY Are THeyIgNoriNG The QUEstioN?” Ther are videos where you can see the damn roof smoking before WTC was even hit!

[@eh1702]

Please try to get with some rudiments of rational thought. Absence of evidence is not evidence. And it is not even absent anyway! It’s out there in public on loads of different videos!

[@barnesmultimedia2725]

Yeah, right.

[@lucathegamer9113]

Was that a demolition or what was it?

[@eh1702]

No, that was not a demolition. Look at its right hand side when the roof extension collapses. It collapses all the floors down that side of the building, you can see all the windows. And that pulls all the rest of the walls and floors in. Why don’t you people *WATCH* these videos? You have more information at your fingertips than every previous human civilisation combined, and all you can do is regurgitate asinine non-questions. That was a building whose roof had been pelted by tons of burning debris falling on its roof about seven hours before. That was a building which, after the WTC2 collapse, had no water and no firefighters to fight its fires. That was a building that burned out. That was a building and which had hundreds of tons of burning debris rammed into its back from a collapse. That was a building whose basement was part of the whole complex of five levels underneath the plaza that all seven WTC buildings shared: the basements that both burning infernos of millions of tons of burning debris collapsed into.

[@macg7992]

Yes

[@lucathegamer9113]

@@macg7992 dang

[@lucathegamer9113]

@@eh1702 calm down

[@eh1702]

@@lucathegamer9113 I’m sick of juvenile ignoramuses playing wanky games with horrific, why should anyone be calm about that?

[@JIA-JUN-GUO]

這是一場令人難過的悲劇 但是為什麼WTC 7 會倒塌?

[@fuwa9616]

the govsshils found this vid really quickly judging from the comments.

[@WWStorm]

Did silverstien own that bldg, too?

[@eh1702]

Did your ma drop you on your head when you were a baby? Did your daddy never teach you that innuendo and insinuation are the coward’s substitute for a statement?

[@Oldschooldan1]

This was the only bldg Silverstien owned. WTC 1&2 were owned by the PANY.

[@eh1702]

All those kids in black and grey sweats and hoodies carrying grocery bags, collecting “evidence” from people’s cars…

[@eh1702]

Jesus, the Dunning-Kruger comments and “questions” here are asinine beyond belief. People so ignorant of basic principles of thought that they assume everything they personally don’t instantly understand is a “weird” “strange” or “suspicious” thing. No, folks, it’s not it that’s “weird” or odd or even unexplained - it’s just *you* not knowing stuff. You are experiencing the sensation of not-knowing. It’s not it - it’s you. That’s all.

[@owlhater270]

You're the Dunning Kruger..... Nerd

[@eh1702]

@@owlhater270 Like who complains that the idiot in a “based on real events” movie is based on them, you self-selected for the cap that fits, my friend.

[@owlhater270]

@@eh1702 Crack head. What are you smoking?

[@owlhater270]

@@eh1702 No, I spent over 500 hours on this subject. I use to work for United Airlines

[@owlhater270]

You're dribbling bs

[@K_3_R_R]

Ok remove my comment again and I'll ban your channel.

[@CTV911]

I'm not removing any comments. KZbin has an automatic comment filter. I hate it.

[@TexasAirRaiders]

It’s happenns plus if anything CTV would like to see feedback anyway so it would not unlikely for him to delete

[@RyanBarr-zf3ig]

@11:38 Mexican/U.S border OPEN!! Everything else closed, suspended or canceled 🫣