Hi Mark, the crosses on the surrendering Japanese aircraft were actually green on a white background. At each airfield that was surrendering, at least one aircraft was painted all white with green crosses to show cooperation with the surrender, and all propellers were then removed from other aircraft to prevent any last-minute suicide attacks. Initially, during surrender negotiations, the Japanese delegation flew two all-white Mitsubishi G4M "Betty" aircraft with green crosses applied where the Hinomaru would have been placed to meet General MacArthur at Manila, Philippines on 19 August 1945. There are some great details of this mission and the white aircraft with green crosses in "The Rising Sun," by my late friend, John Toland.
@tgapete012 жыл бұрын
One of those white painted aircraft surrendered at the end of the war, a Mitsubishi A6M3 Zero now resides in the Auckland War Memorial museum in Auckland New Zealand.
@jaredevildog63432 жыл бұрын
He won't respond. He never does.
@christianZaal2 жыл бұрын
@@tgapete01 I've often wondered why the Zero in the Auckland War Memorial Museum was painted white. Thanks for the info!
@HighlanderNorth17 ай бұрын
❓🤨 Even though their propellers were removed, what stopped the Japanese pilots from just bolting 3 wooden canoe oars to the main propeller shaft, taking off, and then using the planes to achieve overall air supremacy over the allies in late 1945? According to my extensive research, oars from canoes are 98% as efficient at propelling WW2 era planes. So, if they'd adopted this oar tactic, it's clear that the Japanese would've made a major comeback, and likely won the war in the Pacific...... (BTW, to those who haven't figured it out yet, this 😁←smiley face means I'm not being serious).
@davidallen86112 жыл бұрын
When I was in high school my best friend’s grandfather was an engineer and he would tell us about how he went to Germany right after WW2 and the German fighter pilots would take him flying to explain techniques. He then went to Japan to do the same thing with the Japanese’ experimental technology.
@madeanaccounttospillthebor95682 жыл бұрын
I would ne extremely hesitant about being a pilot in Japan and using experimental technology.. Has a kind of legacy ya know?
@tpl6082 жыл бұрын
And? You write as a click bait website.
@noahboat5802 жыл бұрын
@@tpl608 describe how they write, i dont know what you mean
@tpl6082 жыл бұрын
@@noahboat580 finish the story. Don't leave people hanging. Like click bait websites.not that difficult to grasp.
@tpl6082 жыл бұрын
@@noahboat580 minimum. State which was better in his opinion
@Roller_Ghoster2 жыл бұрын
Japanese Stukas, Japanese Tiger tanks. This channel expands my mind.
@highjumpstudios23842 жыл бұрын
Don't get too excited. The Japanese tiger tank never shot at anyone.
@steffenrosmus91772 жыл бұрын
@@highjumpstudios2384 that is not correct there were trial in late 1944 with some Sherman wrecks still manned with the dead crew.
@wayneantoniazzi27062 жыл бұрын
The Japanese didn't need the Stuka, the Aichi "Val" dive bomber was rugged, reliable, and good enough as it was.
@klaus-peterborn13702 жыл бұрын
@@wayneantoniazzi2706 And was a construction of Ernst Heinkel.
@highjumpstudios23842 жыл бұрын
@@steffenrosmus9177 source?
@milescoleman2492 жыл бұрын
Im a bit sketchy on the exact detail but my uncle ( long past now) Told me when I was a Kid ( 53 years ago) that he was a us army infantry man in new guinea. They came out of the jungle one day and discovered ME 109's on a landing strip. He said everyone was freaked out because they thought " on no! the Germans have gotten this far into the pacific and are helping the Japanese" I appreciate many will think this is made up B.S but he was one of the most stand up people I ever knew and not a liar. I was only 10 years old and didnt have the maturity to ask better questions. Ive always wondered about this so I watched this episode. Still not sure but he was pretty adamant about it and as a old iron worker he didnt tell lies or listen to those who did.
@johan-erikjohannesson2796 Жыл бұрын
Guessing he saw Ki-61 Hien IJAAF planes. Said planes used inline engines rather than radial engines and therefore looked more like a German or Italian planes. The Japanese used licensed copies of the Daimler engines.
@moomoo770611 ай бұрын
@@johan-erikjohannesson2796 This is most likely the case. The Ki-61 was originally mistaken for a German aircraft, and the Allied codenames for it reflects this. It was originally "Mike", but was later changed to "Tony" as it looked more like an Italian plane than a German one.
@augustosolari77212 жыл бұрын
Japan also licensed the DB 601 from Daimler. Their KI-61 looked very similar to a German or Italian fighter, being the only Japanese fighter produced with in-line engine.
@locutus1552 жыл бұрын
Remember that the Ki 100 was a Ki 61 airframe retrofitted with a Mitsubishi kensai radial engine when the factory building the Kawasaki Ha 40 inline was destroyed by a earthquake. Ironically the Ki 100 turned out to a superior aircraft and upgrades originally planned for the Ki 61 airframe were set up on the Ki 100 in series.
@cozduntow2 жыл бұрын
Ki-10 would like a word, and not to nitpick but it’s a V no?
@hitomarusensha2 жыл бұрын
People often attribute the Ki-61 to some kind of copy of European fighter design but the reason they looked European was because the lead designer, Takeo Doi, was trained by Dr. Richard Vought to be his successor in aircraft design. He spent a long time learning fighter design from a European and spent many years in Europe learning aircraft design so he made an aircraft that looked somewhat European. If you learned how to design a castle in Japan and then were asked to build a castle in Europe the result would look Japanese more than likely.
@bitai6832 жыл бұрын
ki 32 didnt use a radial engine
@Kman31ca2 жыл бұрын
@@hitomarusensha Yup, this is accurate.
@nordicson28352 жыл бұрын
It us a shame that things were destroyed without a thought to the historical value they hold. Another informative and enjoyable post , thank you.
@groupb94202 жыл бұрын
Maybe because at the time they weren't thinking 80 years down the road, everything built was relatively new for the time.
@jesusramirezromo20372 жыл бұрын
They basically destroyed everything that would worsen their punishment, and basically pretended to be a lesser evil than Germany
@wayneantoniazzi27062 жыл бұрын
Historic preservation wasn't really thought of at the time, people who lived through WW2 wanted to put the nightmare behind them as quickly as possible. I can't really blame them.
@binaway2 жыл бұрын
There was so much produced and captured and not everything could be preserved. There was also a lot of rebuilding to be done which at the time was a lot more important.
@adamconroy21462 жыл бұрын
I had heard of these weapons being shipped to the Japanese before, but had no idea of how relatively prolific the relationship had become in regards to secret tech being exchanged. I often wonder how affected ww2 would have become if Radar was shared with the Japanese also. Thanks again Mark.
@tomt3732 жыл бұрын
That and the atomic bomb, eh? 😄
@JunkerWhoop2 жыл бұрын
@@tomt373 Well, the US did share it with Japan. Twice.
@wayneantoniazzi27062 жыл бұрын
The Japanese did have radar and it was certainly being used by 1944 when the B-29 raids started. However assuming it was copied from Germn radar it wouldn't have been as good as allied radar was. German technicians managed to recover and repair a radar set from a crashed British aircraft and were surprised at how good it was, much better than their own.
@danbrown57362 жыл бұрын
@@JunkerWhoop heh
@braamvorster82492 жыл бұрын
The Germans did not have an effective radar early in the war. The British did though
@amadeusamwater2 жыл бұрын
Because Japan's conquests were spread over a large area of ocean, Japanese planes tended to need to be long range. German planes operated mostly over land, so may not have had the range Japan needed.
@wayneantoniazzi27062 жыл бұрын
The range of the Bf-109 was fine for the Luftwaffe's operational doctrine for it, as an interceptor and local air-supremacy fighter. Until it wasn't.
@r2gelfand2 жыл бұрын
I was just about ready to ask if the Germans ever tested any Japanese aircraft and you took the words right out of my mouth!😁
@craigtanner69162 жыл бұрын
Fascinating as always! These stories are the rest of the fabric of ww2, to which many would be unknown if not for your incredible research and telling them in an objective style which is beyond commendable. I always look forward to seeing your latest fascinating story from “ between the main threads “ of ww2 history. Thank you for all your extraordinary hard work bringing these videos to us. A treasure for sure!
@shelbyseelbach95682 жыл бұрын
They aren't the rest of the fabric, but they are definitely more of the fabric.
@steveshoemaker63472 жыл бұрын
Thanks!
@djzrobzombie28132 жыл бұрын
Mark Felton productions....promote that lord and lady landlord scam ... Also that Fake kamikoto knifes made in Japan ( they where not made in Japan ) 😂😂😂9
@TRHARTAmericanArtist2 жыл бұрын
As a young man I was fortunate to know a German fighter pilot. He flew all of the planes including the first combat jet the Me-262. He liked the 109, but said that landing was dangerous due to the landing gear being very close. The Focke Wulf he said was more comfortable and fast, but there was nothing close to the 262 for him. We never discussed fire power as it was a delicate subject.
@wayneantoniazzi27062 жыл бұрын
That jibes with an interview I saw on the History Channel years back with a Luftwaffe veteran. He said that once off the ground the 109 was easy to fly but takeoffs and landings called for 100% of your attention, nothing less would do. If you kept your mind on your work you were fine.
@TRHARTAmericanArtist2 жыл бұрын
@@wayneantoniazzi2706 He also told me that they lost 48 trainees to accidents out of 150 before the war and that they learned on biplanes from the first world war. They had to land square back then and because he was short (most fliers came from the cavalry in WW1) and the planes were for taller guys, he had to pull himself up in the cock pit to land his plane. The landing carriage had no pistons but a sort of chord he described like a heavy rubber band. He was a nice old guy and became an American citizen after flying his 262 to Greece to surrender to the British. He was sent to intercept, but had other ideas. 😏
@wayneantoniazzi27062 жыл бұрын
@@TRHARTAmericanArtist Thanks for that! Those heavy rubber bands are pretty much the same as bungee tie-down chords you can find in hardware stores today. Builders of WW1 airplane replicas use bungees the in the same manner they were used 100 years ago.
@aaronlopez4922 жыл бұрын
Dr. Felton, you are correct this was rather surprising to me. I never knew that there were so many 109s and 190s. Thank you much.
@12what34the2 жыл бұрын
If I'm not mistaken, the Bf/Me 109 (all variants) is the most produced aircraft of all time, 30k made or so I think
@kiowafourty9642 жыл бұрын
Thank you, Mark Felton, for all your work in making these awesome videos. I have yet to find one that doesn't make me excited to watch. Thank you!
@carlosfaliveni24422 жыл бұрын
Siempre se aprenden cosas nuevas e interesantes con Mark Felton.
@chrisstonestreet52962 жыл бұрын
Best videos on WW2. Dr Felton's videos are interesting and always engaging.
@marioborkowski58942 жыл бұрын
Again, this is awesome little nugget of history.Thank You Mark.
@damien57482 жыл бұрын
Said it MANY times before and will say it AGAIN....the so called "History Channell" on tv can learn a LOT from Dr Felton.👍👍👍
@Anlushac112 жыл бұрын
The Nakajima Kikka was based on notes, drawings, and descriptions of the Me-262. Later, Japan got more detailed info on the Me-262 and were able to design a more closely related aircraft, the Nakajima Ki-201 Karyu.
@_qaz_2 жыл бұрын
Kikka and Karyuu were developed at approximately the same time. There was no better data, as no submarines arrived after that point. Kikka was just an indigenous aircraft, while Karyuu was based on Me 262A.
@peterkirgan29212 жыл бұрын
hi dr mark peter here from Australia love your channel ! please keep it up & take care doctor !!!
@michaelsnyder38712 жыл бұрын
Actually, the Luftwaffe was very interested in the Ki.46 recon aircraft. The Ki.46-III in particular was fast at high altitudes that reduced Allied intercepts despite radar warnings. They were given access to the aircraft in Japan and the plans of the aircraft and were prepared to pay for a license but were finally turned down by the IJAAF in late 1944.
@dutybod12 жыл бұрын
Just to point out Mark that it`s not an ME109 but a BF109 messerschmitt. Thanks for all you do for history buffs.
@Sturminfantrist2 жыл бұрын
Yes its a Bf 108 or Bf109 , Bf110 for Bayrische Flugzeugwerke but Me210/410 or Me262 is correct . another mistake is the He112B-ohhh , its not an Ohh its a Zero/0, its allways a number behind the Dash - not a letter, aircraft with zero/0 are called the Nullserie (zeroseries) in german in german aircraftproduction, hes a historian he should know such things Same joke like calling the Spit MKV a SpitMK Vee or SpitMKIX a Mk ay ex
@SEANSMART302 жыл бұрын
This reminded me of a Japanese comic series called Luftwaffe 1946, which was published in English but quite hard to find now, which was set in an alternative World War 2 where the most modern German weapons had reached Imperial Japan and joined making the war drag on.
@SuperTimebandit2 жыл бұрын
They used a Black Focke Wulf Ta if i remind me correctly
@ghjjfrs72112 жыл бұрын
Nice avatar. Did you ever watch The Hidden Fortress?
@djzrobzombie28132 жыл бұрын
Mark Felton productions....promote that lord and lady landlord scam ... Also that Fake kamikoto knifes made in Japan ( they where not made in Japan ) 😂😂😂9
@MPGunther12 жыл бұрын
All of your information is always very interesting. Thank you Dr. Felton
@carthy292 жыл бұрын
Brilliant yet again, came across a good story recently about the free french air squadron using spitfires who fought on the russian side on the eastern front as a french unit , they did well during battle of kursk
@MDzmitry2 жыл бұрын
If you're talking about "Normandie-Nieman", they never flew Spitfires. They flew Yak fighters instead. And there were no other Free French squadrons on the Eastern front.
@CatBroiler2 жыл бұрын
The He-100 is actually a pretty cool aircraft, it had an unusual cooling system, where it would use the wings as radiators. Though this meant it was a poor fit for combat, as the first hit to the wings would likely result in a coolant leak.
@kidpagronprimsank052 жыл бұрын
Almost entire plane to be precise.
@0Turbox Жыл бұрын
Other planes used the wings for fuel tanks and stored ammo for their wing mounted guns. No plane would look good getting hit by incendiary rounds at these places.
@matthewmcmacken67162 жыл бұрын
I did find this very interesting. Danke', Dr. Felton. Oh, and I look forward to reading the book you mentioned you wrote. Cheers.
@bobcosmic2 жыл бұрын
Another gem from Dr Felton !
@russellavenson85572 жыл бұрын
Another amazing video keep up the great work!
@mattblom39902 жыл бұрын
I appreciate this video as well as Dr. Felton's first book (which I will be purchasing). While not nearly as extensive in quantity as the Allies, there was substantial sharing of technology between the Axis and the Japanese shipped back rare metals and substances to Germany as well.
@brafianblackfyre92202 жыл бұрын
from the thumbnail, I thought it was a war thunder premium review
@wsg9092 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your great work Mark. A story I’d be very interested in is what really happened with the Canadian built Avro Arrow interceptor jet if you would consider that.
@malcolmformosa1772 Жыл бұрын
Hi Mark Felton, I'm watching from all the way down under from Mount Gambier in the Great State Of South Australian. 🥇🇦🇺🦘⚜️👑⚜️🏴🇬🇧
@1957bat2 жыл бұрын
Suprising how many of us Blokes at work are fans of Mark's excellent documentaries.
@devonwhetenhale88282 жыл бұрын
I'm blown away by the pics and vids you have! So cool! 😎Thnks Mark!
@MVStarCatcher2 жыл бұрын
Another outstanding piece of historical work. Thanks Doc
@NunyaBizznaz2 жыл бұрын
You cover subjects that I have never seen before, and that is impressive because I have followed WWII history for decades. Well done Mark Felton!
@aurorajones84812 жыл бұрын
5:19 It looks like a flying car. How the side windows look and sit with the rear window dropping just as it would in a sedan. Its neat.
@thomaslundy51232 жыл бұрын
1) The crosses of the Japanese surrender markings were specified to be green, not black-I believe that most were, in fact, green. 2) Some sources state that the example of the FW 190's engine mount helped the engineers at Kawasaki re-engine the Ki 61 to create the excellent Ki 100.
@jagapatto2 жыл бұрын
I live right next to Tachikawa. This area has always been a center of Japanese aviation. I live under the flight path of Yokata Air Base--a joint USAF and JSDF installation. I love this history.
@RenerDeCastro2 жыл бұрын
War Thunder actually featured several of these Japanese German planes as Premium vehicles in the Japanese Tech Tree.
@Nemxkolopx2 жыл бұрын
Why the hell everytime when WW2 vehicles is the topic every war thunder peasant banzai it Bruh wt is such a shitty game below average p2w game
@wesleysayud4192 жыл бұрын
Eg. Fw-190, Bf 109, etc.
@kalui962 жыл бұрын
The A7He1 is pretty cool
@EncrypticMethods2 жыл бұрын
HE-100D -1 was one of my favorite low tier f2p planes.. despite the small caliber mgs. It can close the distance incredibly fast and 1,500 rounds can pepper the shit out of any plane.
@EncrypticMethods2 жыл бұрын
I also find it fascinating that Japan actually had several he-100s in their air force.
@Bullitt34012 жыл бұрын
There was a good documentary on the history channel in the early 2000s. I think it was called Secret Japanese Aircraft Of WWII. I still have it recorded on VHS. It's worth checking out if you can find it.
@jfh92192 жыл бұрын
Loved this!!
@Redmi-qt5ml2 жыл бұрын
Hi Mark, your videos never ceases to amaze me with the amount of interesting content and detailed information. This is off-topic but I am very intrigue when you mentioned that the Germans had a U-boat base in Penang, Malaya towards the end of this video. I was born in Penang in the late 50s and lived there for the past 40+ years. As a young boy, I was told and made aware of the attrocities commited by the Japanese forces but have never heard of a U-boat base on the island. Truly fascinating!
@wayneantoniazzi27062 жыл бұрын
It never seems to be mentioned, but all those millions of people still living under Japanese tyranny on the Asia mainland (and as you mention in places like Malaya) in August of 1945 was another factor in Harry Truman's decision to use the atomic bomb. Those Japanese occupiers would have resisted indefinately unless told to stand down and surrender by their government. If the Japanese had been pushed back completely to the home islands (as many people think they were) it would have been another matter.
@ContendCreators Жыл бұрын
Hey I heard of a German ship stationed in your area named the Thor, it sunk alot of ships but then a German ammunition ship blew up next to it and the Germans in the ship were blown away into the water or burnt
@pittbullking872 жыл бұрын
Wow, how interesting! I knew there was some trade between the two but I did not know how much. I didn't know there was a U-boat base in Panang, Malaya either.
@Danekim_2 жыл бұрын
Can’t wait until dr Felton drops the Hess series videos 🎉❤
@danielgreen37152 жыл бұрын
Your Videos are a must see Mr Felton Thankyou for All the Arcane facts you come out with
@YamahaR120152 жыл бұрын
I always assumed the Japanese had to have operated some German fighters. I didn't even bother to think about this being possible due to the Siberia railroad. Nor did I expect the Japanese to get these in such large numbers. Quite amazing to learn
@spitfeueranna Жыл бұрын
8:24 - the British Tiger Moth looks a lot like the Bucker Bu 131. Both came out in the 1930's
@randyminnick50312 жыл бұрын
Well done! Another excellent video, sir! Thank you!
@babuzzard64702 жыл бұрын
You never disappoint Mark, thanks so much👍.
@paulpowell48712 жыл бұрын
Always a Pleasure hanging with Mark.....
@patrickf26712 жыл бұрын
I found it incredibly interesting Dr Felton.....As always...Thank You.
@MrXdmp2 жыл бұрын
Thanks Dr. Felton!
@montydendron12 жыл бұрын
First class narration.
@LuisVillanuevaCubero2 жыл бұрын
Amazing content as always!
@matthewlok30202 жыл бұрын
The zero is a navy aircraft and had nothing to do with the army as the Japanese army and navy were at odds at best then. The army had the Ki-43 Hayabusa which had similar capabilities with the Zero
@muhammadnursyahmi94402 жыл бұрын
That's the biggest understatement i have ever read in this comment section.
@WALTERBROADDUS2 жыл бұрын
Not really a necessary comment there Matthew.
@derekowens18172 жыл бұрын
@@WALTERBROADDUS if the Japanese Army elected not to adopt a short ranged German aircraft because they had access to the A6M2 then, clearly it is a necessary comment, the A6M2 being used by the Navy, not the Army. Mr Felton's comment in this respect is clearly erroneous, just like the "black surrender crosses", which were actually green. D
@WALTERBROADDUS2 жыл бұрын
@@derekowens1817 Mr Felton and the rest of the world already knows the Imperial Army did not use the a6m. And if the biggest takeaway of a 15 minute video is a paint color? You're really reaching for something to comment on.
@derekowens18172 жыл бұрын
@@WALTERBROADDUS triggered muchly, are we? Clearly Mr Felton has made a mistake associating the A6M2 with the Japanese Army, as it was a Navy fighter, the Army had no interest in it, and never used it in any way, shape or form. He's made an error, simple as. Matthew's earlier comment clearly more necessary than your dross, simple as. D
@HeavyDragoon2 жыл бұрын
As always....GREAT and SUPERB content......as expected.
@RattyFlyer2 жыл бұрын
I'm finally subscribing to all the channels I love. Keep up the good work. Subscribed today and hit the Bell. Don't tell the history guy but I like your videos better. :)
@Rusty_Gold852 жыл бұрын
Another excellant "Did you know?" from the Professor
@lappin64822 жыл бұрын
great video as always....looking forward to purchasing your book "the fujita plan"
@mattgeorge902 жыл бұрын
Thank you for sharing this!
@albdamned5772 жыл бұрын
Lol I love that the Germans names the trainer plane “young man”
@ronaldwatson19512 жыл бұрын
Very informative and interesting info. Great video
@foxtayle6832 жыл бұрын
It's nuts that the Japanese didn't mass produce the FW 190. They had a rare gem there.
@muhammadnursyahmi94402 жыл бұрын
Japan never had the industrial capability of US, nor Germany. It was even smaller than Italy in term of industrial capabilities during WW2.
@hitomarusensha2 жыл бұрын
The reason they didn't was because they felt they had good fighters as well which they did. In the research documents of the staff that reviewed German fighters they found the offer of a production license interesting but had very little interest as their fighters were comparable or fit their need better. I have a video from an expert on the subject of the zero and alot of myths around Japanese aircraft "inferiority" that explains it in more detail if interested.
@PassportToPimlico2 жыл бұрын
I think that by the time they got the FW190, they were considering their own improved fighters and the delay in setting up production of a new foreign plane was too long..
@jumpinjehoshaphat90752 жыл бұрын
@@hitomarusensha post the video, provide a link?
@iota5152 жыл бұрын
@@hitomarusensha The video states that the evaluators of FW190 found it better in many regards to their contemporary japanese fighters.
@georgestemple33102 жыл бұрын
Another excellent video thank you
@russwoodward82512 жыл бұрын
Extremely interesting and unique history. Thank you Dr. Felton.
@Spitfiresammons2 жыл бұрын
I’m impressed of history of German aircraft’s in IJAF but I did hear USA flew captured soviet aircraft during the Cold War. Great history Dr Felton.
@grahamepigney85652 жыл бұрын
Most combatant countries fly their enemies aircraft when they can, for R&D and also for simple combat inteligence, The Brits, Germans, US all did in WWII. The US did, when they could, during the Cold War.
@oldegrunt2 жыл бұрын
constant stream of communist pilots from various countries fled their country plus what the Israelis captured sold/traded gave the US/West plenty to study and then use as USAF OPFOR aircraft in the National Training Centers
@oldegrunt2 жыл бұрын
@@JarrodFrates No idea on numbers but the various posts stateside had considerable numbers of Sov Bloc aircraft that people that worked w/them said were defectors birds. That was in the late 70s/early 80s before we got friendly w/either Indonesia or Egypt for such transactions. I do bow to your statement on defectors aircraft being returned as I have no knowledge of that. However it was also public knowledge (and inservice) we got lots of equipment of all kinds from Israel.
@djzrobzombie28132 жыл бұрын
Mark Felton productions....promote that lord and lady landlord scam ... Also that Fake kamikoto knifes made in Japan ( they where not made in Japan ) 😂😂😂9
@roybennett9284 Жыл бұрын
Once again mark sheds light on something that the history channel can't do, fantastic.. kind regards Roy Bennett from Wollongong Australia
@roscoewhite37932 жыл бұрын
It's 0044 AEST here, and a Mark Felton video appears just as I'm about to log off... ah, sleep can wait!
@basichistory2 жыл бұрын
Fascinating video, well done.
@jehoiakimelidoronila5450 Жыл бұрын
About the Japanese kikka ("orange blossom"), there's another design that closely resembles the swallow (262) and that is the ki-201 karyu ("fire dragon") fighter-bomber, also built by Nakajima for the army air force that predated the kikka, which is a fast attack bomber for the navy Air service I say design because plans to build it fell through & the orange blossom instead became the 1st Japanese jet
@willyboyw.57712 жыл бұрын
I just bought your "Ghost Riders" book Mark, looking forward to reading it.
@danielburkett78357 ай бұрын
Interesting video. I've heard that the Bf109E was tested and evaluated by Japan, but never heard of the others mentioned in your video. Thank you for adding to my knowledge.
@MetalCooking6662 жыл бұрын
Every time I think I’ve heard everything interesting about ww2 and I feel like the topic has been done to death, Mark Felton brings out another fascinating video. Also, I understand he went to the University of Essex, as did I!
@MikeG422 жыл бұрын
That Messerschmitt Bf 109E looks good in Japanese markings. Same with the FW-190.
@solid-state2 жыл бұрын
3:42 I've never seen this photo of a japanese He-112, I've only ever found 3 very low quality photos.
@MCMilitaryForce2 жыл бұрын
The intro music never gets old
@davidlondon90022 жыл бұрын
Enjoyed! Good one!
@simonrook57432 жыл бұрын
Pedantically the nakajima is a float plane and not a flying boat. The floats are not part of their fuselage while a flying boat has the fuselage as the floatation hull. Otherwise another great video.
@TBagr2 жыл бұрын
Holy cow! Dr. Felton with another avalanche of knowledge.
@JawbolingWoW2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for blessing us with another history lesson!
@paulmurphy422 жыл бұрын
Keep 'em coming Mark!
@mattischlese5385 Жыл бұрын
2:25 nice easteregg about the Bf 109 (which some people won't stop calling Me 109)
@andrewpinner31812 жыл бұрын
Thanks Mark ! That was all new to me.
@jasonmussett21292 жыл бұрын
Excellent video👍
@roscoewhite37932 жыл бұрын
Fascist Italy also supplied Japan. 82 Fiat BR-20 Cicogna medium bombers were purchased in 1937 as a stopgap after development of the Mitsubishi Ki-21 bomber had been delayed. They were phased out at the end of 1939.
@pauljenkins68772 жыл бұрын
Fascinating. I am left with the impression that the Japanese were curious about German technology, but ultimately simply preferred their own, rightly or wrongly.
license-built Fw-190d9s would’ve been a nightmare for B-29s if fielded in significant numbers. Especially in the early raids where P-51s couldn’t escort all the way to Japan.
@sonnyburnett87252 жыл бұрын
I’d love to know why the Japanese aviation industry in and before WWll was so dedicated to the elliptical wing design for so many of their aircraft. There must be a story there.
@VC27 Жыл бұрын
Dr. Felton please do one about the Gulbarga Me-109. The aircraft was gifted by the British, in pristine condition, to the Nizam of Hyderabad. It was reduced to a hapless wreck and rotted away at a college before being rescued and smuggled out of India, thankfully. I believe it is being restored somewhere in the UK today.
@mickvonbornemann38242 жыл бұрын
In the frame at 0.29, is that Colonel Klink on the right?
@wayneantoniazzi27062 жыл бұрын
Damn! You know, he's a bit of a heavyweight but he could pass for Colonel Klinks brother! You know, I'm reminded of something. About 20 years ago I was at a militaria show and a vendor was selling German WW2-era postcards featuring prominent Luftwaffe aces. Right in the middle (but without attention being called to it) was a postcard featuring Werner Klemperer as Colonel Klink! You could tell when someone spotted it by the hysterical laughter!
@ryankc36312 жыл бұрын
I don't always watch Mark Felton videos but when I do I'm guaranteed to learn something about a subject I thought I knew a lot about.
@matthewlok30202 жыл бұрын
You can compare watching Dr. Felton’s videos to drug addiction, except these videos don’t kill you like drugs do
@daystatesniper012 жыл бұрын
Superb as per usual good Sir.
@martingenau23092 жыл бұрын
Es wurde nicht nur die Motoren von Daimler Benz in Lizenz gebaut, es wurde auch ein Panzer Typ VI Tiger gekauft aber nicht ausgeliefert, auch Pläne für U Boot + bau einer Atombombe weitergegeben
@gravychipplease2 жыл бұрын
Outstanding information (as usual)
@eltenda2 жыл бұрын
Great video! 👍
@TankerBricks2 жыл бұрын
Mark. Thanks for providing my Wednesday night entertainment!
@jonbutzfiscina13072 жыл бұрын
Late in the war, the plant that supplied engines for the KI-61 was destroyed. With many airframes built but without engines, it was decided to fit radial engines to the slender fuselages to create the KI-100. The Japanese studied their FW-190 to accomplish this engineering feat.