Its so difficult to properly show the troop movements in this war with front lines and involved military units often unclear. You have done a great job here!
@Eastory3 жыл бұрын
Yes, it took me 3 months to do so.
@interestingengineering2913 жыл бұрын
@@Eastory wow 🤩 thanks man I really love your work and your voice is soo smooth 😘
@Burner.Account..3 жыл бұрын
@@Eastory How did you manage to gain access to Chinese and Japanese sources tho? And how do you know what to look for?
@jerryx32533 жыл бұрын
@@Burner.Account.. I assume he has Patreons who could reas both Chinese and Japanese.
@FDNY1012023 жыл бұрын
Facts
@ShortHax3 жыл бұрын
When you invade a collapsing nation that’s been embroiled in a civil war and battle them to a draw for 9 years
@ZemanTheMighty3 жыл бұрын
Sadly the tooth and nail defence of China by the nationalists allowed the communists to win the civil war
@ISCARIOTSHIELD3 жыл бұрын
@@ZemanTheMighty why sadly
@naruoze3 жыл бұрын
@@ISCARIOTSHIELD Because the CCP prove to be a totalitarian regime later. It slaughtered Chinese civilians and intellectuals even more than the Japanese army.
@ISCARIOTSHIELD3 жыл бұрын
@@naruoze wtf I love the CCP?!!
@oldrabbit82903 жыл бұрын
@@naruoze and the Kuomintang was democratic??
@sporemaster183 жыл бұрын
Absolutely awesome summary of the first stages of the war in China.
@ethanyiu4913 жыл бұрын
Yes
@jayg61382 жыл бұрын
terrible. Taiwan island was under Chinese control until Japan invaded.
@sporemaster182 жыл бұрын
@@jayg6138 What? Taiwan had been under Japanese control since 1895. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiwan_under_Japanese_rule
@妮姆芙-o3z2 жыл бұрын
@@jayg6138 Taiwan is China's territory, according to the Cairo Declaration
@fargr59262 жыл бұрын
@@妮姆芙-o3z yeah, agreed, but Japan grabbed Taiwan in 1895, not during ww2.
@ekszentrik3 жыл бұрын
The Chinese front was the ultimate whack-a-mole sunk cost fallacy of WW2.
@mac28573 жыл бұрын
@Purple Emerald educate yourself
@memer79873 жыл бұрын
@Purple Emerald Mr-popo
@Lawrance_of_Albania3 жыл бұрын
@Purple Emerald you will eat rice one day
@Lawrance_of_Albania3 жыл бұрын
@Purple Emerald what country are you from?
@Lawrance_of_Albania3 жыл бұрын
@Purple Emerald I didnt asked for your adress, i asked what country are you from
@gargravarr23 жыл бұрын
It's strange to see Chinese Army Groups being the equivalents of Japanese Divisions.
@decimusdecius78583 жыл бұрын
Chinese used a lot of manpower to stop Japan, they had more units than Japan but as its mentioned in the video the effectiveness of their army was bad. Important thing to note was warlordism in china. The country unified only because of Japan threat. Their army was patched together from various warlord forces at the start of the war. Together with civilian casualties, china had second biggest casualties in WWII, over 20 million people. Only fraction of their forces was close to western military standard. It was called 60 division plan. "In 1934 General Hans von Seeckt, acting as advisor to Chiang, proposed a '60 Division Plan' for restructuring the Chinese Nationalist Army into 60 divisions of highly trained, well-equipped troops along German doctrines." Only few divisons was restructured, and their potential has been wasted in battle of Shanghai (1:31 in video those units were part of 9th army group, the circle with number "9" you can see what happened to them at 2:18 time stamp.) Also china, not only produced its own arms and equipment, it bought alot from foreign countries before the war. Mainly from Nazi Germany and Czechoslovakia. After start of the war, they started getting support from allies which helped them to stay in the war.
@jerryx32533 жыл бұрын
A Japanese division possessed more artillery, machine guns and support units than an entire Chinese army corp. Sometimes even an army group did not have the comparable supporting arms than a Japanese first-class division.
@looinrims3 жыл бұрын
Chinese units were small
@Nathan-jh1ho3 жыл бұрын
Most Chinese units were poorly trained, lack artillery, also many units weren't full
@rayray64903 жыл бұрын
The Japanese division can be 15-20k men. A typical Chinese division can be anywhere from 5000 - 10000 due to many commanders pocketing from “empty rosters” on paper for what a full-strength division (9-10k) should be. 2-3 divisions make up a corp, while the 2-3 corps would make up a army group. I think the Chinese army corp is roughly the strength of a Japanese division but on paper only. Like other people mention, there’s simply not a lot of heavy weaponry and equipment to spare on the Chinese side. I think in some divisions, even the better ones…2-3 soldiers might share a rifle. Malnutrition is also a major issue especially in the latter years of the war. Limited ammo production for small arms also mean less ammo for target practice. All this means that other than the best divisions, the average Chinese infantryman is disadvantaged from the start
@Ksensei413 жыл бұрын
Never understood how large the offensive was before. Thanks
@naruoze3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for having interest in knowing about this history. Didn't Japanese textbooks teach this history in detail? I wish they could remember and acknowledge the history as the Germans do.
@jerryx32533 жыл бұрын
@@naruoze Nah.
@kaga-yh3ue3 жыл бұрын
@KSG In fact, when Soviet troops invaded Berlin, a large number of mixed-race people were born, but none of them have been identified in Nanjing.
@warawara-o9t2 жыл бұрын
IN DETAIL?You can't find this in Japanese textbooks AT ALL
@主人-u5z2 жыл бұрын
@@naruoze only in Chinese history textbooks
@dingusdean19053 жыл бұрын
It’s great to finally see a good, in depth video about the 2nd Sino Japanese war. There’s almost nothing on the subject despite the intensity of the combat, the suffering of the people and the single minded resolve of the brave NRA defenders. Almost every city the Japanese stormed was its own Stalingrad. Lacking anti tank weapons, heroic young students *volunteered* to be fitted with grenade vests to take out the Japanese tanks as suicide bombers. It’s astonishing how none of this gets any real attention
@norwegianboyee3 жыл бұрын
We always hear stories about concentration camps in Europe and the USA. Barely if ever do we hear stories of events such as the formation of Unit 731 or battles such as the battle of Shanghai. I remember being the only one in my history class to talk about Imperial Japan when we were making presentations about events in WW2.
@chozer13 жыл бұрын
@@norwegianboyee probably because we dont live in asia. if you want to focus on that its probably gonna be on some chinese site. is what i would say if it wasnt a dictatorship lol
@aaroncabatingan52383 жыл бұрын
Information about the 2nd Sino-Japanese War is unreliable at best and pure propaganda at worst.
@dingusdean19053 жыл бұрын
@@aaroncabatingan5238 which is exactly why it’s so hard to research yeah
@lc92453 жыл бұрын
Two folds, information about the war is still shrouded in bias and uncertainty. Half of that was due to the Japanese able to conceal their archive because they were not occupied by a foreign nation intending to dismantle it, so information would be able to be systematic change or destroy. The American occupation was also lenient and amiable rather than an effort in dismantling like others, thus the Japanese had more control over what they will provide to the public. Not only that, the successor state was exactly the same, and not one that was hostile to the previous one. Then, there's the Chinese records. This is even worse due to the KMT record being lost during the chaotic civil war. In addition, the CCP also pick and choose the information it wants to publish to glorify their contribution and diminish the KMT's. Thus, the information available have been through 2 governments, 2 wars, a few purges. Then, the nature of the war leaves a lot in doubt. While the first few years might have been action packed, with lots of interesting events and battles. After that, other than 2 major offensives, were mostly skirmishes and minor battles, as the front becoming static and the frontline confusing. From a military standpoint, the war became, boring. The Japanese themselves shifted from the IJA to the IJN, as war with the U.S. heated up. The war ended without the Chinese retaking China, but with the Japanese surrendering. Such as the situation in China, that if you live in Shanghai for the time, your life would be uncertain, but continue mostly normally after the titanic battle. The Japanese managed the economy badly, but there was still demand and supply, so people buy, sell, trade with each other and the Japanese as normal. The IJA can even be considered cushy military jobs, and many commanders made riches in China. Only the IJN was badly battered.
@100thdragoon3 жыл бұрын
When Sugiyama and Nagano presented themselves, the emperor, observed historian Eri Hotta, “displayed the incisiveness he was capable of when utterly compelled-which did not happen often.” How long would war last with the United States?, he demanded. Sugiyama volunteered only three months. The emperor rejoined that Sugiyama had told him the China Incident would end in about one month, and now four years later it still raged. Sugiyama haltingly replied that China proved to have a vast hinterland. A clearly riled emperor retorted: “If the hinterland of China is vast isn’t the Pacific Ocean even more immense?” - Tower of Skulls, Richard B. Frank
@maxthexpfarmer39573 жыл бұрын
Did this really happen? It’s insane that his excuse was that China was big. Did he not know that before?
@olegdemianenko30543 жыл бұрын
@@maxthexpfarmer3957 I can certainly imagine it happening. I have heard/read several times that Japan was overly optimistic and even delusional about successfully subduing their opponents and that a lot of crucial information was witheld from reaching their top brass, further reinforcing the optimistic outlook. Perhaps their consecutive victories over the course of 30 years have clouded their judgement and they actually believed they were unstoppable.
@maxthexpfarmer39573 жыл бұрын
@@olegdemianenko3054 They lost the Battles of Khalkhin Gol.
@olegdemianenko30543 жыл бұрын
@@maxthexpfarmer3957 They certainly did. I was saying that in general Japan was still quite successful in their conflicts and it may have given them the wrong impression that they were "the bigger fish".
@Fizzydog773 жыл бұрын
@@maxthexpfarmer3957 Its similar to the bad assumptions that Germany made before Barbarossa. Both powers knew the places they were invading were huge. They assumed those distances would be irrelevant, since the economically potent areas were within rapid reach, and the seizure of those + destruction of the existing frontline forces would lead to total political collapse and thus victory. The Axis powers did not appreciate the resilience and cohesion of the KMT and the USSR, and how an unprovoked invasion would only strengthen defiance in the enemy.
@SgtAndrewM3 жыл бұрын
when the world needed Eastory most....he returned, thanks for the great content
@itjustjuan51483 жыл бұрын
The Chinese theater is one of the most interesting aspects of the second world war. Glad you're covering it!
@XMehrooz3 жыл бұрын
And the most brutal!
@stoneruler3 жыл бұрын
Yes, it was absolutely devastating. The Japanese did the most unthinkable atrocities to China. Including using civilians as live samples for bio weapon experiments.
finally, I left a comment about doing sino-japanese front in the other ww2 videos, never thought you are going to do it, so glad you did!
@Kabutoes3 жыл бұрын
If I’m mistaken, Soviet general Zhukov was studying the battle of Wuhan and learned to prepare for what’s later known as Stalingrad
@m.r.daniel53953 жыл бұрын
I learned a lot of new things about the Chinese-Japanese war from this video, and I think I learned the main cause for Japan declaring war on America. Thank you for sharing these things with us. We can't wait to see the next part of this video. Keep up the good work!
@SpaceMonkeyBoi3 жыл бұрын
Evil Eastory be like: "Hello, I'm Westory, and today we will be talking about how I want Estonia to be annexed by Russia."
@tankart36453 жыл бұрын
I think you meant "Hello, I'm Westory, and today we will be talking about how I want Estonia to be annexed by East Estonia"
@SpaceMonkeyBoi3 жыл бұрын
@@tankart3645 you mean southern Finland?
@tankart36453 жыл бұрын
@@SpaceMonkeyBoi I want to start a petition to rename Russia to East Estonia, and then the big chunk up there in north to East Finland.
@sussymussydude3 жыл бұрын
@@tankart3645 ну нихуя ты замахнулся, проще переименовать Финляндию в северную Эстонию
@filipinordabest3 жыл бұрын
Eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesti
@mollye3 жыл бұрын
"the war situation has developed not necessarily to Japan's advantage" -Hirohito's surrender broadcast on August 14th 1945
@andrewlynch41263 жыл бұрын
The greatest understatement of all time
@czarson66943 жыл бұрын
He's right tho
@apalahartisebuahnama76843 жыл бұрын
Because Japan's main enemies supposedly China and USSR, by giving themselves to Uncle Sam it would give them more advantage than fighting him.
@lolasdm695911 ай бұрын
@@apalahartisebuahnama7684 What? Their main enemy is the US, which is literally invading the mainland
@onetwothreefour39573 жыл бұрын
first time i've seen this time of the war be so clearly described thanks so much, every video you make i get reminded why you are one of my best subscriptions
@oasis12823 жыл бұрын
Ask
@napoleonibonaparte71983 жыл бұрын
I do hope you do a full series for the Chinese Theatre. It’s a very overlooked theatre of war.
@googane77553 жыл бұрын
Why do i see your comment everywhere?
@AI-ih5or3 жыл бұрын
In fact, there is no need. From the Japanese occupation of Wuhan in 1939 to 1944, the Chinese and Japanese armies were basically in equilibrium on the front lines of the battlefield. Although the war is still very fierce, it has not changed much. In 1944, Japan was cut off by the U.S. military on the sea transportation route, and Japan regrouped its army to open up the land transportation route to Southeast Asia. At this time, China's elite troops were on the battlefield in Myanmar, so Japan was able to quickly occupy more territory, and the war situation changed.
@owo58693 жыл бұрын
@@AI-ih5or The elite troops are technically under western command and logistics I believe. 1944 ROC army is a shell of its former self, recruitment and conscription of local populace are somewhat common. Logistics isn’t a thing anymore. There was a report that 93% of U.S supplies that went to China went to the American semi military personal stationed in China. That means yes U.S is supplying something but contrary to belief propagandize by Stilwell, McCarthyist , and CCP the supplies wasn’t disappeared due to corruption there’s simply not enough going into the front. Japanese in their fashion launches their operation and you know the rest both ROCA and IJA damaged each other so hard CCP won.
@lolasdm695911 ай бұрын
@@owo5869You are so wrong, the ROCA and CCP both had quite some time to prepare after the Japes surrendered. If anything the ROCA was better equipped compared to the start. There were way more stuff from the US to the KMT than USSR to CCP. I have no idea why people can't accept the KMT was a incompetent facist warlord state, even if you are anti-ccp, so what you want to support someone worse? Chiang was so incompetent the US couped him 5 fxing times, twice during the Japanese invasion. Because with the equipment he was given, the Americans were struggling to understand why isn't the Chinese armies kicking Japanese ass????
@epicpeebrain2 жыл бұрын
This channel is seriously underrated, these animated battles are so good
@Atomic8663 жыл бұрын
Couldn't find any quality animated content about the war on KZbin, thanks for shedding light on this underrated topic.
@jason89233 жыл бұрын
Note on the map at 4:30 : Hefei was not an extremely important city then and it wasn't the provincial capital of Anhui (it only had a population of 30,000 in the 30s and was a relatively small town). The provincial capital of Anhui Province was Anqing until 1945. Also note that many areas of China were only nominally under Japanese control but the Japanese weren't able to exert their full authority over the entirety of the areas they occupied.
@WBCY20243 жыл бұрын
I guess he was trying to visualize the front lines. But you are right. The 100 regiment offensive couldn’t have been conducted if Japan controlled all of the territories
@mxn19483 жыл бұрын
@@WBCY2024 they controlled cities and major strategic points with forts/strong point they built. but they never really controlled the countryside.
@Akkise3 жыл бұрын
Wasn't Hefei just a castle?
@jason89233 жыл бұрын
@@Akkise it was a smallish town.
@vmerkwurdigliebe37513 жыл бұрын
@@Akkise it was a county, so to speak.
@Birdman3693 жыл бұрын
There was a minor battle against the Japanese that took place near the village that my dad came from. The battle for a crossing over a nameless river cost 300 lives. The names of those that could be identified were carved into the faces of the battle monument, those that could not were simply noted as "nameless martyrs". 300 doesn't sound like a lot but when you see the names on the monument it hits differently. Their sacrifices and the price paid in blood and lives ensured the continuation of our people and nation. No matter the flag, the Chinese soldiers that fought for us are all heroes and martyrs.
@great8319 Жыл бұрын
Ya no matter the flag , Chinese is Chinese
@waltuh2.3bviews3secondsago3 Жыл бұрын
I think numbers like 300 put into scale how huge the millions were in battles like stalingrad
@lovelylavenderr Жыл бұрын
As they say in war, "1 death is a tragedy, 1 million deaths is a statistic." We take for granted that when we hear that so and so many people died in a battle or in a war, each one of those who died had loved ones, and had a story. They all mattered to someone. Lest we forget, and glory to the heroes of China who fought bravely for her resistance against a ruthless and cruel enemy. Love from the United States. 🇺🇸💖🇹🇼🇨🇳
@hiyukelavie2396 Жыл бұрын
Why would they be nameless though? Wouldn't they know who was missing after the battle?
@kv4648 Жыл бұрын
@@great8319 🤔 Uyghurs aren't Chinese
@garmonplays3 жыл бұрын
This is an amazing video, PLEASE MAKE MORE CONTENT,I've been waiting for more uploads from this channel for ages.
@ОлегКозлов-ю9т3 жыл бұрын
"Majority of the population perished" Very calm way of describing something even historians used to call "rape of Nanjin"
@noanyabizniz43333 жыл бұрын
Eastory has far right sympathies and refused to denounce Trump and endorse BLM during a Q&A. I'm not surprised he is justifying the massacre of PoC.
@michaelkovacic26083 жыл бұрын
@@noanyabizniz4333 eastory did in no way justify the massacre in this video. And claiming that he is far-right because he didn't denounce trump is a bit of a joke. As an European my understanding of US domestic politics is limited, but i know that both Democrats and Republicans had more voters in 2020 than ever before. Claiming that all Republicans are far-right is just as unsubstantiated as claiming all Democrats are far-left. When you have only 2 parties in such a large country, it is natural that they serve as a pool for many different people.
@michaelkovacic26083 жыл бұрын
@lati long it is a bit surprising that there are actually denialists, since the massacre is very well documented.
@autokrator_3 жыл бұрын
@@noanyabizniz4333 9/10 bait.
@darklysm83453 жыл бұрын
Historians call the invasion of belgium "rape of belgium" when only a few thousand died
@aussiemilitant44863 жыл бұрын
The true start of WWII. Awesome video as always Eastory.
@jirkakubec983 жыл бұрын
I think the translation might be confusing, sometimes units like 集团军 are translated as 'group armies', while it's rather a (combined arms) corps, similarly 军 as an army, while it is a corps, and so on. So it might not be an XXXXX unit, but maybe an XXX unit, with smaller components than the Japanese corps, therefore equivalent to a division.
@nathannaite07093 жыл бұрын
It is more complicated as just few of 軍 and 集團軍 are in full strength
@joewu75343 жыл бұрын
Chinese集团军 is equivalent to a CORP. For example, CCP control 18th集团(corp) which has 3 divisions attached to it
@jirkakubec983 жыл бұрын
@@joewu7534 Thank you for the clarification! I know that 集团军 is correctly a corps, but unfortunately, most western analysts and so on translate it as a "group army" (not to be confused with an army group)... To be honest I really dislike that.
@sakaijin72703 жыл бұрын
@@jirkakubec98 This is a problem for both side. For me. I studied about Chinese army first. So when I first learn about european theater of WW2. I thought the east front was not that big. Because there were only three armies group under Hitler's command..... Then I realized I was totally wrong. There was more than one million personnel for only one single army group. While Chinese army group have no more than 100,000 personnel. The translation is pretty accurate. It's just the same word has been used to named different size of unit. In the west army group is the highest army unit. In China the highest unit is野战军 field army. Which similar to army group in west and consist of more than one million personnel. And both the two units doesn't exist in peace time due to the massive size and components.
@owo58693 жыл бұрын
@@sakaijin7270 All these military also have different systems for chain of command. We can’t find many good accurate translations for ww2 German command structure too qwq Are you a naruto fan?
@BehemothsMargarita3 жыл бұрын
Very well done, I love how this channel presents military history in a much more organic, comprehensive way!
@superpacocaalado72153 жыл бұрын
Japan: *invades China* China: I won't surrender Japan: He is smarter than I thouth
@armandovaiandando64723 жыл бұрын
Just like Hitler thought that the USSR would collapse/surrender
@typegreen34343 жыл бұрын
France:You embarrassed me
@mkjyt13 жыл бұрын
US literally helped China not to be conquered by Japan
@ckjl77043 жыл бұрын
@@mkjyt1 Not until they got bombed in Hawaii
@sb178993 жыл бұрын
@@ckjl7704 The embargo was basically direct help from the US to China lol. Not that the US actually cared about China I guess, they just didn't want Japan to get more powerful as it would be a threat to overseas US territory like the Philippines.
@GurtMan1003 жыл бұрын
I love the combination of animation and commentary, it shows everything in context so well!
@oliwyrm3 жыл бұрын
this is exactly what i needed right now thank you so much
@Minboelf3 жыл бұрын
Japan: We can conquer China in 3 months Also Japan: Took them three months to secure Shanghai
@XCal3 жыл бұрын
Specifically, it took the veteran Imperial 3rd army about that long to finally defeat the rearguard of about 300+ of China's greenest, freshest recruits with half their equipment displaced because said recruits refused to vacate a warehouse. It was too close to a British embassy to just bomb, blowing holes into the wall just gave them more spots to return fire from and Japan's finest kept getting out-melee'd when they try to storm the place. These guys were so stubborn, they refused to even budge from claiming they were actually 800 dudes flat (which became a meme, and then how they were remembered by) or from flying their flag. They also way overshot the time they were originally ordered to stall, and when they finally withdrew from the warehouse the ones too injured to retreat died fighting on their gun emplacements. Later in the Burma Road campaign, seemingly clear cut Japanese superiority would see attacks stalled because half-dead Chinese soldiers from units believed to be obliterated would climb out of the rubble of bombarded positions and begin counterattacking. If we could retroactively name countries, I'd have just called the place Cadia.
@owo58693 жыл бұрын
@Purple Emerald Yeah about the leadership part. Do you mean the leadership that lead a preindustrial society that is at civil war for the past 100 years and won a war against the 4 or 5 leading nation in the world? While having not yet integrated military power like communists and certain cliques both of them setting up self-governing zones all across the country? Also balancing internal politics, foreign diplomacy, and goals of western colonial powers? Furthermore stopping betrayers settling terms with Japan while evacuating the industries and central command centers (capital) and rectifying military command? Yeah dude easy job.
@owo58693 жыл бұрын
@Purple Emerald dude educate yourself
@owo58693 жыл бұрын
@Purple Emerald It’s not a defense it is what it is, this is what they did tell me anyone who can do a better job. All of the political parties that claimed power since the Qing dynasty in China are partially warlords. That’s like saying colonial power fought WW2 for colonies, which colonial power which one do you mean? They’re all the same.
@3dcomrade3 жыл бұрын
@Purple Emerald you think 7 years of absolute peace with an economy facing a world wide despression after its existence and the decade long mismanagement by Beiyang warlords is enough to reform NRA into a truly professional army? China is incompetent in WW2. Because its past has given it no other choice to be better
@cactusgreen44493 жыл бұрын
wasn't china also in a civil war, until they formed the Chinese united front to defeat the Japanese.
@jerryx32533 жыл бұрын
United Front happened in 1936 I think after the Xi’an Incident. The communist and nationalist practically agreed for a temporary ceasefire.
@James-uu6xs3 жыл бұрын
Yeah, after 1911 there were many warlords. All the way until the Kuomintang united china. But in 1927 they purged the communists and sparked continuous civil war until the Japanese full invasion.
@Warsie3 жыл бұрын
There were still KMT and CCP crossfire incidents even *while* they were fighting Japan in their "8 years war of resistance" part of WWII
@mxn19483 жыл бұрын
@@James-uu6xs well, the KMT united china in name only. many warlords still held onto their private armies, only now they got a new title as a general of the RoC. this directly affected how ineffective the KMT armies would be later on in the civil war.
@NotFinnish3 жыл бұрын
There’s like nothing on this how!!! I’m very proud of my country for their effort! Fun thing: at Xuzhou, the 5th division, one of Japan’s best divisions, got held up because the local farmers cut their communications
@leahcimmmm3 жыл бұрын
The common folk sure are awesome too
@Kingkhan-og8xw3 жыл бұрын
@@leahcimmmm well what do you expect when the Japanese massacred civilians.... You expect them not to resist
@skywind95242 жыл бұрын
@@iamcoolboi111 Yeah and they even lost a...旅团长?
@cheng35803 жыл бұрын
My ancestors fought in these battles. Each side of my family played a part on both sides. (I'm both Japanese and Chinese)
@TapOnX3 жыл бұрын
so your like a korean?
@rorychivers87693 жыл бұрын
@@TapOnX No that's a different country. You can look where it is on a map if you like.
@ganfy4653 жыл бұрын
@@TapOnX what
@citytianyu2 жыл бұрын
@@TapOnX LOL, what a bad joke.
@lochunlam8112 жыл бұрын
@@TapOnX lol
@whatsup85832 жыл бұрын
5 months already !!! My life is running, i remember was yesterday! Your content Is amazing. Keep it on fire ;)
@punanchnay3 жыл бұрын
Chiang was holding Shanghai in the hope of gathering Western sympathy and demonstrating China's ability to fight. Though the losses were large it wasn't a total mistake in my opinion. The IJA thought the whole of China would be captured in 3 months and Wuhan in 1 month and were shocked by the defence. Defending Shanghai for as long as possible also gave time for the vital industries and people to evacuate inland, critical to the continued resistance of China.
@stoneruler3 жыл бұрын
But personally I think the battle would have been better made in Nanking. It was a far more defendable city. Shanghai was not in immediated danger at the time, and they could have relocated the industries westward before the final showdown.
@punanchnay3 жыл бұрын
@@stoneruler I agree but Chiang chose Shanghai because of the international settlements, so it would happen closer to the eyes of the Westerners. Since the battle did not have the intended political effects, the sacrifice in military value was not worth it and can be regarded as a mistake. Though Chiang knew that China alone would not be able to defeat Japan so he took the gamble.
@iamcoolboi1112 жыл бұрын
@@stoneruler nanjing is a indefensible city actually, defending downtown nanjing was a death trap for the defenders, and pre war there were actually extremely defensible bunker lines in the Wuxi, Suzhou, line. If chiang told the German trained units and the elite “ tax regiments” units to the Wuxi Suzhou lines, the elite Japanese army (3rd, 6th, 9th, 10th 18th Japanese divisions etc) would be stuck there for possibly 6 months and suffer greater casualties than just 100000 maybe up to 250k+
@stoneruler2 жыл бұрын
@@iamcoolboi111 it’s really down to comparison. Nanjing has a river on one side and mountains on the other, which limits the direction an invading army can strike. Shanghai on the other side is flat, which makes it easy to surround, which was exactly what the ija did. Also shanghai is right on the coast, which meant Japan could easily supply their army with ships, and bombard the defenders with navy guns.
@iamcoolboi1112 жыл бұрын
@@stoneruler Japanese could also use the rivers to bring their ships in to bombard Chinese troops, so it would also be a good idea to go cause river traffic to prevent Japanese from using the rivers.
@jaichind3 жыл бұрын
Part of the ROC strategy of attacking Shanghai is to turn the war from one of Japan advancing South from Northern China to one of the Japanese advancing West from Eastern China. The more West you go the more mountainous it is which negates the Japanese advantage of mechanization and firepower.
@thereynaldosan76953 жыл бұрын
well... """mechanization""" more like horses and paper tanks
@jerryx32533 жыл бұрын
I mean Shanghai Campaign is not the worst idea. It’s just what follows after in the defense of Nanjing was a total shamble. (The entire Fortified line was abandoned without much resistance, not much formations were intact after the Shanghai Campaign)
@kamovka23173 жыл бұрын
@@thereynaldosan7695 well mechanized compared to the chinese who air tanks and human leg instead of horse
@thereynaldosan76953 жыл бұрын
@@kamovka2317 yes, that's why japanese was so efective againts them but so weak againts the US
@thereynaldosan76953 жыл бұрын
@KSG You just have to see the amount of casualties that the Japanese suffered when facing the United States compared to those suffered by the United States
@HistoryHustle3 жыл бұрын
Great production again, Eastory. I also admire your work for the WW2 channel.
@stoopidphersun74363 жыл бұрын
Nice to see you here
@idontgetit83253 жыл бұрын
The amount of time and effort it must take to properly represent the lines of the chinese united front in a simple way that’s easy to understand is a lot more than one would normally think.
Amazingly this is the best explanation of Sino-Japanese war i ever watched or read.
@aslant11083 жыл бұрын
It is the best historical mapping channel. Thank you.
@leaaae4638 Жыл бұрын
I can't believe all these wars only happened 80ish years ago. Looking around the world now. We have advanced so far.
@chriscao6533 жыл бұрын
So glad to see you cover Second Sino-Japanese War in your channel. You help people be aware of Chinese huge sacrifice and contribution to the victory of WWII. Greeting from China :)
@zxbzxbzxb13 жыл бұрын
Great video. I know little about this conflict and it's often overlooked by historians despite how bloody and significant it was
@ayoubalrfadey3031 Жыл бұрын
I watch your videos on the eastern front regularly and I can't stop admiring the work
@HaIodust Жыл бұрын
As a Chinese, they teach this war very in dept at school, and I feel very sad knowing my ancestors suffered through this much
@nby3333 жыл бұрын
Eastory: Covers the eastern front. Eastory: We must go even more east!
@GandalfGreyhame3 жыл бұрын
Amazing video as always! Some constructive criticism: don't display movement with arrows, but with the armies themselves like you've done before. It makes for much cleared and easily understandable animation, and it looks a lot better! :)
@choysakanto67923 жыл бұрын
Japan invaded China because of the following reasons: 1. *Food.* Japan has been dealing with food shortages since the Great Kantou Earthquake of 1923, even worsened by the Great Depression. Hundreds of thousands subsequently died due to hunger and malnutrition due to these tragedies. Japan as you can see is a small country of mostly mountains with an even smaller arable land from which they get their food, mostly rice, from. Not even their colonies in Korea and Taiwan were able to keep up with the demand. China meanwhile has the world's largest rice farming area which is just enough, if not more than enough, to feed Japan's population. 2. *Resources.* Japan once again is resource poor hence it's not surprising they invaded Korea decades earlier for its massive metal and coal deposits. And as mentioned in this video, they also needed oil. They even resorted to importing scrap metal (yes, like discarded metal) if they could not find proper metal just to keep their steel mills running. They have to import nearly all of their needed raw products from other countries at sometimes exorbitant prices. 3. *Great Depression.* Despite being an industrial country, the GDP of Japan is very small. Their only main export that time was silk. When the economic disaster came, it hit Japan to a hilt and got even poorer. However, China in reverse despite all its internal problems got a bit wealthier during the Depression due to its massive export of tea and silk and international demand for Chinese silver (the era before the war was called the Golden Decade). The massive influx of Chinese silk in the world market, which Japan couldn't match in quantity, eventually killed Japan's already fragile economy so much that its military leaders finally felt motivated to invade its neighbors for resources. 4. *Geopolitical threats.* The Russia of 1930's was not the Russia that they defeated (with great effort and hiding behind the blanket of international mediation otherwise the tsarist gov't would have continued the war and possibly even win it back) in 1905. The nearby Soviet Union was only growing day by day, even more so in its armed forces. Soviet technicians and advisers are assisting the Chinese in building a strong army, and there was even a talk of an alliance between the USSR and Chiang Kai Shek's China in the 1920's, one that would militarily steamroll Japan's presence in Korea and perhaps even reach the Home Islands itself. As if they were not enough, Japan being a tiny nation turned paranoid when it felt encircled not only by USSR and China but also Britain to the south and America to both the south and east. Japan felt it needed to act quickly before the tentacles of the imperial powers groped it. 5. *Religious belief.* Japan's military leaders thought of the Great Kantou Earthquake of 1923 that killed hundreds of thousands of their own people as a curse from the gods due to the decadence and excess of Japan's noveau riche and political elite as well as mimicking Western styles too much. They felt that to appease the gods they have to spread Japan's power overseas to show how they are the 'chosen people' of goddess Amaterasu. It didn't help that most military leaders were sons or grandsons of samurai who believed the gods endowed them the right to defend the land of the Rising Sun. So there goes, the reason of Japan's imperialism.
@josten80443 жыл бұрын
Thousands of years of Japanese history and even those of the Empire it all fascinates me. While the Empire crushed the shoguns, the military stilled honored them, going as far as modeling their military after the samurai, and even behaving as separate clans fighting for influence.
@choysakanto67923 жыл бұрын
@@josten8044 they modelled their army after Prussia and Imperial Germany and their navy after Britain but the culture and their outlook is pretty much still samuraic.
@3dcomrade3 жыл бұрын
Nah, its militarists due to the success of mukden incident(in video 1931 Japanese invasion) China is used as a sunk cost fallacy. As for the public, if they just fell that easily. All in expansion if logical
@choysakanto67923 жыл бұрын
@@3dcomrade my points 1 to 5
@3dcomrade3 жыл бұрын
@@choysakanto6792 the invasion of Manchuria is done without the green light of Tokyo. The time the news reached the capital. Kwantung army have scored some victories securing public support
@SNOUPS43 жыл бұрын
Ever since I found this channel many years ago I looked forwards to the release of this specific video! Thanks!
@monkeypie87013 жыл бұрын
so stoked that weve got a video about something other than the european front ww2
@alexandrualex10853 жыл бұрын
Finally someone make a video about the "easter from" in ww2
@dr.woozie75003 жыл бұрын
The land they covered was so the vast Japanese had no way of asserting complete control over it. They mostly just held the frontline areas and strategic forts and cities. They had no control over the countryside and that’s why pockets always developed.
@Kylesaystuff3 жыл бұрын
As Chinese, This war (we treated as part of WWII, and it truly is) always make me sad, not because of the war itself or the second-highest human casualties of WWII, is that after years of suffering, genocide, human experiment from the Japanese. After Japan surrendered, the end of WWII when the world was celebrating, the Chinese civil war will continue, the Chinese people will keep suffering, and forever divided the nationalist(Taiwan) and the communist (mainland China) till this day. We are all Chinese, but power and greed forever divide us.
@宜之物3 жыл бұрын
You are right, I also hope China and Taiwan can be unified, we have been divided for too long
@TheLocalLt3 жыл бұрын
@@宜之物 yes but only under the Republic of China not under the Communist regime
@wanqingluo79913 жыл бұрын
@@TheLocalLt I suspect the present administration in TW would come to rule all of China, given the opportunity, say when China is democratized.
@TheLocalLt3 жыл бұрын
@@wanqingluo7991 that’s the outcome we certainly have to hope for
@Kylesaystuff3 жыл бұрын
@n Zeppeli No, it has nothing to do with it, but I mean the thing is, China has been suffering from war and death for 40years, millions of death each decade, and the Japanese came, making things even worse. Civil war 2, millions of death, then the Korean War, millions of death, the Vietnam war, the cultural revolution, Chinese people suffering from 1840 to 1980 is truly a tragedy. Also, one of the reasons why the Qing empire fell was the war with Japan and the British and the Taiping rebellions in the first place. Second, if Japan didn't invade, the nationalist would have won.
@宜之物3 жыл бұрын
As a Chinese, I am really excited to see such detailed videos about the Sino-Japanese War on KZbin
@floodercw3 жыл бұрын
My grandfather joined the Chinese (ROC) military trying to protect his home country when he was 16, 17 years old. I was lucky to hear him sharing the story of fighting against the Japanese troops and communists when I was young o7 to those great warriors and those who sacrificed their lives 😭😭
@NYG52 жыл бұрын
Dude must have had crazy stories, man. Jeez like 25 years of war
@啦啦啦啦-y1u2 жыл бұрын
致敬
@fargr59262 жыл бұрын
向国军将士敬礼🫡
@haisee1671 Жыл бұрын
Cool!
@alehaim3 жыл бұрын
I kind of feel you did injustice with the initial explanation by just mentioning stagnation, when in my opinion it would have been a vetter way to say that China had been throguh civil war and reunited at last or something like that. The explanation of the battle for Shanghai was quite underwhelming and a bit incorrect. The battle of Shanghai was a bid to buy time for the Nationalist China to relocate industry and people to the west, open a second front against the Japanese to ease the pressure on the northern front and show the international settlement in Shanghai that the Chinese are no push overs in order to hopefully gain aid. Besides that, this is amazing!
@Eastory3 жыл бұрын
Your explanation was in one of the original versions, but I decided to make it more simple.
@三十而立立不立7 ай бұрын
@@Eastory 我可以理解视频的制作者,你已经做的很好了
@Noobmaster-ch7hr3 жыл бұрын
The sheer amount of divisions and movement of those divisions must have taken a hell lot of resources.
@viracocha60932 жыл бұрын
It did
@vladimir-poutine19523 жыл бұрын
"I can conquer China in 3 months" -someone who cannot conquer china in 4 years
@ccdsds32213 жыл бұрын
They pretty much did...
@axelNodvon20473 жыл бұрын
8 years*
@axelNodvon20473 жыл бұрын
@@ccdsds3221 They did? How come the Chinese government never surrendered their country?
@thejudge64533 жыл бұрын
Sounds like "I can conquer Soviet Union in 3 weeks" -someone who cannot conquer Soviet Union in 5 years
@ccdsds32213 жыл бұрын
@@axelNodvon2047 controlling all of the country’s industry and all ports is not winning? That’s like saying the communists did not win the war because the government fled to taiwan and never surrendered... or germany conquering france in ww2?
@marioshobbyhq3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for this clear summary of decade-long war that paved the way to WW2 in the pacific!
@Stand_By_For_Mind_Control9 ай бұрын
Outstanding presentation exactly what I was looking for. Well done.
@LogicalReasons3 жыл бұрын
Amazing!
@HistoryOfRevolutions3 жыл бұрын
Lu Xun (鲁迅) once wrote: "For all of ignorant people of a nation, even if their body is somehow strong, somehow grand, even then they can only make meaningless displays of this "strength". As for the multitude of constituents and observers, however many may die from this sickness, this is still not to be considered as unfortunate"
@slkjvlkfsvnlsdfhgdght54473 жыл бұрын
and what does it mean? it seems pretty opaque
@winstonsp46893 жыл бұрын
Is it Lu Xun from Chinese three kingdoms era?
@g0-b0y903 жыл бұрын
Every time I see a new Eastory video, I get super excited.
@matyasspevacek2863 жыл бұрын
This is the greatest present and also a part of war not many people know about. Thx
@edwardmao97922 жыл бұрын
extremely good video, I also read and saw a number of Chinese documentaries and books, and now I know better where and how exactly these events happen.
@lintulv94863 жыл бұрын
Eastory has officially become my favourite channel on this site. I only have one question. How do you make these videos? Where do you get the information needed, what program do you use? I appreciate all anwsers i get!
@gonavygonavy11933 жыл бұрын
When you take on Britain (largest colonies) USSR (most territory) USA (greatest industry) and China (highest population) at the same time, and only admits defeat when 2 atomic bombs are dropped on you.
@condty31233 жыл бұрын
japan >= Britain (largest colonies) USSR (most territory) USA (greatest industry) and China (highest population)
@greg50283 жыл бұрын
Excellent work as always! Really hoping to see the Soviet Union vs Japan especially on Sakhalin island in 1945.
@blackgold35843 жыл бұрын
you know its a really good day when Eastory makes a video.
@George83_Thomas Жыл бұрын
The changing scale bar is a much appreciated addition
@esTehPana5553 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for making a 2nd Sino-Japanese war video! I’ve always wanted a good video on this topic but it is hard to come buy. This channel, however, did very well and I am so happy! 😃 cheers!
@badbob95963 жыл бұрын
Why China ended up becoming a communist nation is one of the great, mostly untold stories of that time period. It all started with what you have shown in this video and i would love to see more.
@魚金-o4d3 жыл бұрын
@KSG It was a lie who many believed due to the heavily corrupted KMT also.
@CrasusC3 жыл бұрын
@KSG It's not as simple as that. Yes KMT was wore out, but at the start of the civil war, it is still stronger than the CCP forces, as NRA had the elite X and Y corps trained in Burma Theatre, and KMT had more numerous soldiers. That's why CCP forces lost many battles and had to give up so much territory in 1946. CCP forces only become stronger later in the war, when various policies, such as Land Reform, gave them manpower and material advantages, and CCP generals employed guerilla and maneuver warfare to wear down the KMT forces. It was true that KMT was much less popular than the CCP at that time, because of perceived non-resistance during the initial Japanese invasion, during that of the stalemate period and the loses during Operation Ichi-Go. This perception was NOT true, as NRA did all they can to slow down Japanese advance. However the perception was there, and CCP capitalised on its propaganda values. The other reason KMT was unpopular was because of corruption. This is true though. I can give two well documented examples: 1) many generals in the NRA registered "phantom units" with the central government in order to get more funding, 2) many ordinary people were press-ganged into the NRA, resulting in resentment. A further reason that KMT was unpopular was because of the mismanagement of economy during the war years. The hyperinflation in Free China during the war years is well documented. One result of hyperinflation is that ordinary people's savings were wiped out and they were stuck in poverty, which did not help the KMT to garner support.
@pocketmarcy69903 жыл бұрын
Mao cheated
@extra96903 жыл бұрын
@KSG KMT with 4M army VS CCP with 2M army. Guess who win? excuse is useless. KMT's corruption is the main point. that's all.
@ciaclee3 жыл бұрын
@KSG lol, looks like you still don’t understand why the communist party won.
@naruoze3 жыл бұрын
Thank you for refering to the Nanking Massacre. Although I'm not a Chinese nationalist and will soon move to Japan, I hope the Japanese could remember and acknowledge what horrible things they've done in that war. Japan is now a nice country, but they could only get full respect if they acknowledge and reflect on their warcrimes like the Germans do.
@nielslach93433 жыл бұрын
It's unbelievable that the japanese still don't recognize the massacre. You can't learn from history if you don't acknowledge it.
@jerryx32533 жыл бұрын
Appreciate your thoughts. However most of Chinese knew that Japanese would never acknowledge the fact. (Just like the Turks would never acknowledge the Armenian Massacre)
@Snp20243 жыл бұрын
You don't have to be nationalist to acknowledge one of worst warcrimes .
@aokiboo04193 жыл бұрын
There are so small amount of time for school education of modern history in Japan. Shameful govments have been cutting education and hiding their past invasions and war crimes. Feeling very sorry. But welcome you, thanks for coming.
@naruoze3 жыл бұрын
@@aokiboo0419 Yes Japanese government is so right-wing and it seems like the majority of Japanese people are right-wing inclined. It surprised me that in a democratic country a left-wing party which supports same-sex marriage got only 20% votes. Thank you for your welcome:)
@busbee51633 жыл бұрын
My dreams really do come true.. *Eastory uploaded*
@chrisnorman11833 жыл бұрын
Oh yeah Eastory! Thanks mate as been waiting for another one of your amazing videos :)
@CharlieZColt3 жыл бұрын
Great video! A couple of small historical discrepancies though are that the oil embargo occurred after the Japanese moved their troops from north Indochina to south indochina in July of 1941. They had invaded north indochina in 1940 which resulted in a lesser embargo of scrap metal and other metals. Also at the end, the Japanese believed that an invasion of Dutch and English European colonies would mean war with the US but unbeknownst to them secretly the US was unwilling to declare war over an invasion of European colonies only their own.
@Warsie3 жыл бұрын
The US was actively assisting the enemies of the Axis powers and Roosevelt was trying to fabricate a casus belli against the Axis as long as Roosevelt is in power something will be done to antagonize the Axis into DOWing the US.
@TheLocalLt3 жыл бұрын
The last past makes no sense the Japanese attacked American, and British possessions all at the same time, and with the Dutch also declaring war they were immediately at war with all 3 powers (although the Dutch mainland was occupied by Germany, the colonies were still under Royal Dutch control). The only great power possession they occupied before that was French Indochina, which was part of Petain’s now-neutral France. The allies embargoed the Japanese over their garrisoning southern French Indochina and eventually the Kingdom of Thailand - the very next step the Japanese took was the simultaneous invasions of the British Malay Federation, the British Protectorates of Perlis, Kedah, and Kelantan, the British Straights Settlements, British Hong Kong, the American Philippines, American Guam, and American Wake Island, plus of course the hit and run attack on Hawaii that was meant to deal the knockout blow to America’s Pacific Fleet.
@CharlieZColt3 жыл бұрын
@@TheLocalLt the Japanese attacked them all at the same time because they were under the incorrect assumption that an attack of British and Dutch colonies would result in an American declaration of war. An assumption that internal documents declassified after the war would show to be incorrect. Also they occupied northern French Indochina in 1940 after the fall of France (their punishment was embargos on raw materials such as scrap metal and copper) and southern French Indochina in 1941. (For which their punishment was the oil embargo and having their bank assets frozen). If you believe any of this information to be incorrect, I recommend reading about these events to confirm their validity.
@TheLocalLt3 жыл бұрын
@@CharlieZColt it’s irrelevant whether it would or it wouldn’t, it was simply impossible to wage total war in the region while leaving these strong quasi-enemy positions in place, where if war ever broke out they could just cut the Japanese supply lines in two from the Philippines. Also every day America didn’t declare war on Japan pressure would mount, especially if the British and Dutch neared defeat. Also America had ordered Japan out of China, yet the reason Japan would be attacking the British and Dutch was for more resources to expand the war in China. There was no realistic way to wage war in the South Seas while leaving major American possessions in place.
@CharlieZColt3 жыл бұрын
@@TheLocalLt it is relevant because the factual situation at the time provides a minor discrepancy to what he said in the video. What you’re saying is based off the idea that public sentiment to the war would change without an attack on American soil, which is speculation. While your assessment is valid it is a hypothetical assumption of what could happen where mine is that based on facts of the time East History should have made minor revisions to his scripts to keep everything 100% accurate to the facts of the time. We’re talking about what was not what probably would have been
@bjorntorlarsson3 жыл бұрын
Very efficiently explained! The YT channel "Kings and Generals" promise to have a long and comprehensive series about the Pacific war, week by week 80 years later. But somehow this channel is more to the point and effective if one compares with their about the same war.
@Kanbei112 жыл бұрын
They're probably too busy with the cold war channel now
@ヤマトウズメ-r1o2 жыл бұрын
kzbin.info/www/bejne/hl6pmIiel7mGjJY 第二次世界大戦において、日本人は日本のためよりも、むしろ戦争によって利益を得た他の国々のために偉大な歴史を残した。 On world War II, (第二案)On World War II, Japan left a great history, not only for Japan, but also for the other countries that got benefits from war. (第3案)In World War II, Japan contributed a great history to the countries benefited by the war rather than its own country. 【確定】On World War II, Japan achieved a great deal in the history, not of its own, but rather of the other countries benefited by the war. それらの国々とは、日本の掲げた理想、大東亜共栄圏に含まれた国々である。 (第一案)They are the Asian countries that are included in Japan's ideal, "Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere". (第二案)These countries includes in the Great East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere which Japan has raised its ideal. 【確定】Those countries were included in the Great East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere that Japan idealized. アーノルド・J・トインビー Arnold Joseph Toynbee
@HamiltonStandard3 жыл бұрын
The high school I attended had a small theatre. It seems every semester the history department showed the same newsreel or more comprehensive documentary(s) about this war, year after year. I always watched with fascination and genuine horror, but never really understood the scope of what I was seeing until now... Thank you.
@citytianyu2 жыл бұрын
Really? I wish my son could see that in his school some day.
@JiaruiChen_ Жыл бұрын
What school
@ZZZ25733 жыл бұрын
Quality content as always. Bravo!
@antteraraphaelhoskinen5043 жыл бұрын
best video...yet...there is not much sources on YT about 1937 - 40 japanese attack...thank you wery much
@mastermirror38883 жыл бұрын
I would like to add that although Chinese partisan troops(mostly Communists) did not inflicted much casualties to Japanese troops, the guerilla warfare caused much difficulty for Japanese to gain profit from its occupied territory, and Japan had to mobilize some of its forces against the partisan troops instead of using them to attack KMT's regular forces. Japan could not gain what it wanted, and had to invade Southeast Asia, which caused the Pacific War.
@altacc0604 Жыл бұрын
Also contrary to popular belief, CCP didn't get most of manchuria. They only took the outskirts while the KMT took the important parts such as Shengyang and the machu capital(forgot name). They had 1.25million people armed with old siezed japanese weapons while the NRA has 4 million with western aid. CCP certainly did not get a free win unlike what most ppl think
@mastermirror3888 Жыл бұрын
@@altacc0604 Indeed. I think you are refering to Changchun (Hsinking of Manchukuo). By the end of 1946, KMT forces had already taken most of the major cities and railways of Manchuria. CCP were also receiving aid from USSR but it was much less than what KMT got from USA
@mastermirror3888 Жыл бұрын
@@altacc0604 And it's ridiculous that many ppl believe CCP won because of Soviets' help. The initial victory of PVA against UN forces proved that PLA at that time was not a common rag-tag third world army, but a efficient and formidable army that may rival even US army to some extent.
@lolasdm695911 ай бұрын
@@mastermirror3888 I think you are ignoring the fact that the vanguard 39th army PVA units making the first offensive in Korea were armed with Springfields, Leenfields and Type99 rifles. If PVA were just using local weapons, PVA would have just failed. If you look at Chinese ww2 rifles sold overseas, half of them don't have rifling, and get stuck a lot. Which explains the absurdly bad performances of the general Chinese forces against the Japanese, when compared to completely British armed KMT divisions which demolished the Japanese in Burma. It's rivalling the US army to some extent because it sometimes literally use the same weapons, like the Soviets didn't even have heavy artillery during the Korean war. Mao boasted once that the all 50 heavy artillery China had were all American made. Mao also started several new plants which made American designed guns in Manchuria because the PVA soldiers were telling him the Thompson machine gun was better than the Soviet PPh.
@mastermirror388811 ай бұрын
@@lolasdm6959 I'm talking about communist partisans during WW2. At that time, chinese communist forces did not have much modern weaponary(guns and ammunition were far from sufficient, and very few artillery). The US-made weapons you are talking about were first given to KMT for fighting Japs, and then were seized by PLA during Chinese civil war, so you are speaking of the truth, but you got the time wrong.
@estiarosenkreuz66282 жыл бұрын
As a Chinese, this video is so good, but, probably the video would mislead the understanding of people on the condition of china at that time, in 1930s China was not such a united one like what video showed, not like Soviet Union, but actually was controled by many independent warlords and factions, and they were fighting each other. Not all the Chinese military were fighting Japanese. That's why we see Chinese army far outnumbered Japanese but still lost again and again.
@karuneshmehta91613 жыл бұрын
Amazing 😄
@warspite19953 жыл бұрын
I love it when I see an Eastory video in my sub box..... 10/10!
@kurzemitemanamila3 жыл бұрын
You know its a good day when eastory posts :3
@abukafiralalmani3 жыл бұрын
Next time I will play China or Japan in Hearts of Iron 4 - Not a step back
@sghasas3 жыл бұрын
I played China and it is not easy, as better equipped Japan and the early start of the war manage to negate the massive manpower advantage of China. I needed to get a specific focus tree that early centralizes and annexes the communists in order to be better prepared
@albertchan87983 жыл бұрын
@@sghasas I usually just spam infantry outnumbering the Japanese by 5-1 it works fine but I haven't tried this strategy in multi
@theobsidiangaming53813 жыл бұрын
@@sghasas It is easy tho. Reply to me if u want me to tell you how I did it? Cuz I don't wanna type the entire guide and having it ignored.
@Snp20243 жыл бұрын
If you wanna win make better equipped bigger division (fully trained and stall Japan in North and lots of bigger cavalry division and let Japan land and quickly kill them outnumbering them at landing position rinse and repeat . It's always work for me better than spamming lots of underequipped division.
@arturocevallossoto52033 жыл бұрын
I remember doing that but in Darkest Hour for HOI2. There was an event "Setting Sun" that if you managed to hold out and push into Korea then the Japanese surrender.
@asianperson1043 жыл бұрын
Japan: We have conquered your capital, most of your industry, and commuted war crimes on your civilians, surrender now or be annihilated!!. China: I DIDN’T HEAR NO BELL
@abukafiralalmani3 жыл бұрын
I am so excited 😁
@DHGameStudios3 жыл бұрын
Awesome, I look forward to this series.
@credulousrbt8943 жыл бұрын
What a great video on such a under-discussed topic in media. Plz continue to make part 2!
@-frogmanontheisland75252 жыл бұрын
While focusing on the war, I'll tell you a story about my family. Whenever the Japanese troops occupied a village, if they found a beautiful young woman in the village, they would take the girl and use her as a prostitute inside the army. My grandmother escaped because she made herself up as a man.
@Killerbee47123 жыл бұрын
"I can take China in 3 months" - Someone who cannot take China in 3 months
@tongmu58813 жыл бұрын
At that time, the entire regular army of the Chinese army had only 400 cannons, 132 bofors 75mm howitzers, 48 German 150mm cannons, and 60 105mm cannons. It was completely dependent on the lives of soldiers to fight modern tanks and aircraft for 4 years. Although politically incorrect, we are still very grateful that Hitler sold us these cannons. Without these cannons, the situation would be even worse.
@n1nj4sp4rt4n2 жыл бұрын
And soviet supplied air and equipment
@weareeverywhere88512 жыл бұрын
A national socialist also set up a safe zone in Nanjing, saving 100000 civilians from being captured by Japan.
@johnb.86872 жыл бұрын
Must have been before the axis treaty.
@lessthanpinochet2 жыл бұрын
That's crazy considering that the Germans and Japanese were supposed to be allies.
@andrewfyip Жыл бұрын
@@johnb.8687 yes, Germany only withdrew their support of China after allying themselves with Japan.
2 жыл бұрын
Chang Kai-shek’s holding of Shanghai was to put a show to foreigners that China was determined to defend itself in order to attract foreign aid
@Anthony-jo7up3 жыл бұрын
Thank you so much for this. For some reason no one ever talks about the war in China even though they were one of the major Allied powers.
@sethheristal95613 жыл бұрын
Why Japan attacked USA? Another possible answer: Japan continued on a road already full of mistakes, hoping that somehow the situation would get better.
@joselee96053 жыл бұрын
The choice was between the Soviet Union and the USA, I guess they thought the US was too far away to car
@WBCY20243 жыл бұрын
@@joselee9605 soviets hadn’t no developed oil field in the Far East, whereas the SE Asia had many built by the Europeans and Americans.
@jamesjamison34633 жыл бұрын
It was literally explained in the video.
@TanPenguin2 жыл бұрын
As a Chinese, thank you for telling us the story of the War of Resistance against Japanese Aggression. I hope all the people in the world can cherish the hard-won peace. 作为一个中国人,感谢你为大家讲述抗日战争的故事,希望全世界人类都能珍视来之不易的和平。
@covfefe77062 жыл бұрын
lol the US literally saved your ass and Mao thanked Japan for severely weakening the Kuomintang
@hkboi74332 жыл бұрын
@@covfefe7706 truee
@hkboi74332 жыл бұрын
@@covfefe7706 I agree with you as a Chinese
@hkboi74332 жыл бұрын
@@covfefe7706 but the Chinese stood the Japanese for 4 and a half years
@jasong17132 жыл бұрын
@@covfefe7706 true
@chadchad24833 жыл бұрын
Nice work. It’s very difficult to reasonably visualize the troop movements in this war, because informal forms of war including guerrilla warfare and mobilizing/anti-mobilizing civilians in occupied areas( which counts for a huge portion of Chinese people) were so important. Japanese forces could always advance barely opposed if they want, but their unsafe supply route and manpower drain( more compared to that in USSR, because of the rough terrain, poor infrastructure and population) due to occupation could not be neglected. Usually, a few guerrilla units led by communists can threaten many territories, while formal KMT Chinese armies are mostly undermanned and ill equipped. So I feel both military units and territorial change should be visualized for a comprehensive work. There are some attempts on territorial change during the war, which may exhibit the power of the battles ‘behind the line’, in Chinese websites for reference.
@johnanon3722 жыл бұрын
Nationalists hold the front line and partisans pin down as much Japanese force as possible.
@jldldr39333 жыл бұрын
Oh god I can not belive it, another banger from Eastory.
@jacon58593 жыл бұрын
When the world needed eastory the most he returned Great content btw :)