Leela's unpredictability and sense of humor + Danny's understandable, engaging narrative = a chess lover's delight
@sandercoven25546 жыл бұрын
You have been for years, still are and surely will continue to be one of the very best chess commentators. Looking forward to many more of your videos.
@bhgtree6 жыл бұрын
Thanks Danny, enjoyed your analysis of this game.
@seasideman6 жыл бұрын
That was a complex game which you managed to explain so that even i could understand it. Thanks Danny, good job, and a great game by Leela.
@klajdimyrtaj50526 жыл бұрын
nirvana didnt capture that knigt, so epic underpromotion, watched it live
@artur-rdc6 жыл бұрын
Pro tip: close your background games before you start recording.
@artur-rdc6 жыл бұрын
Don't worry about it. It was a good video nonetheless.
@nelsontumambibg13986 жыл бұрын
.
@dannygjk6 жыл бұрын
What about all the piece noises when you play in tourny's OTB? Do you wear earplugs?
@B3Band6 жыл бұрын
^ Yes. Always. I'm not the OP, but hell yes, wear earplugs! Especially if there are kids/stupid people in the vicinity. But anyway, your analogy doesn't make sense. This is an analysis. Do you hold a press conference for two tournament players while other matches are still being played? If yes, do you do it within earshot of the other boards?
@dannygjk4 жыл бұрын
@@B3Band My point is ability to focus while normal sounds are going on in the background. A press conference would not be normal sounds in the background while playing.
@armstrongarunachalam22216 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the world-class commentary Daniel! Your analysis of the Alpha Zero games were a treat to watch!
@Luredreier6 жыл бұрын
Perhaps. But this is a *Leela* Chess Zero game... *Not* Alpha Zero...
@jamesmoore56036 жыл бұрын
Nice job Danny. This game provides lots of ideas about a king side attach and you covered them very nicely. Thanks
@TrondArneAusdal6 жыл бұрын
Excellent commentary Just loved the way you were explaining the ideas in the opening/position!
@tanishqsoni7012 жыл бұрын
Kinda analysis that you provide is just absolutely amazing. Another new day for Lc0!
@artemmsk7016 жыл бұрын
Such a great review, Daniel! Entertaining, insightful and very professional at the same time! Pleasant 18 minutes of my life!
@modolief6 жыл бұрын
Crystal clear explanations of King side vs Queen side strategy, thanks!
@dalsanto46 жыл бұрын
more leela games please!
@andrewswales54246 жыл бұрын
Wonderful video Danny. Loving the series, thank you.
@antos21696 жыл бұрын
Enjoyed as always, thank you! Waiting for the next one
@davidjames55176 жыл бұрын
An especially thoughtful and informative analysis, Danny. Thanx so much.
@ea27636 жыл бұрын
Succinct and clear analysis Danny. Really enjoy these computer matches. Thanks
@trevorvanloon11256 жыл бұрын
Enjoying the coverage Danny! Keep it up :)
@xDMrGarrison3 жыл бұрын
These are some of my favorite chess videos on the internet :D
@38FerreroX6 жыл бұрын
I thought I had the tournament still opened in the background. You trolled me
@56Model306 жыл бұрын
Thanks Daniel, excellent informative analysis of an entertaining game.
@inversehyperbolictangent39556 жыл бұрын
Very informative analysis. Thanks! Never thought there'd be this much insight into this game. I guess I haven't given Nirvana enough credit; even though it lost in the end.
@ajay176v6 жыл бұрын
Excellent analysis!
@dabeamer426 жыл бұрын
"playing with her food" -- LOL
@Luredreier6 жыл бұрын
Well, she *did* in the previous game of hers featured on this channel...
@SteveN-dw1uy6 жыл бұрын
I Guess she does it because she expects the piece to immediately be taken. Losing a knight in the end game is probably considered better than losing a queen, even though it doesn’t really matter to a human (you are exchanging a passed pawn for a piece).
@chessartst13396 жыл бұрын
Amazing job explaining the position Danny , I feel enlightened
@dadalo56 жыл бұрын
Outstanding and clear analysis as always, thanks
@evanwood77566 жыл бұрын
Watched this game live; was absolutely epic to watch
@mattbeckwith6 жыл бұрын
Appreciate the in depth opening class.
@MichaelFJ19696 жыл бұрын
13:01 Instead of Na4, why not h6. Won't that help close down the king side and give black more time? Later white f5 can be answered with g5.
@nilsp94266 жыл бұрын
Do engines also do the opposite error of underestimating the value of material? It seems like they tend towards either being accurate or overestimating material over dynamic factors, but I did not see enough games to be confident on that.
@4elove4ishee6 жыл бұрын
f4 doesn't seem that weird to me. Black pieces are predominantly on the queenside, the sacrifice allows to activate the second white rook and launch a dangerous pawn at the same time. That was the first move i thought of, but im a reckless noob, so what do i know
@protectedmethod97246 жыл бұрын
no worries. :) thanks for the comment
@johanrichter26956 жыл бұрын
I always think of sacrifices. The tricky part is recognizing the few situations where they actually work.
@kylen64306 жыл бұрын
The difference is if you are wrong, you probably lose, reset the pieces and have a good laugh about it later. An engine plays every game like it’s life depends on it...
@igorchernyadyev1616 жыл бұрын
f4 is the first move I saw when Danny started talking about a !! idea. Actually Nirvana gave its most useful piece for a useless rook on a1. The bad bishop that manage to advance beyond the pawn chain is often as valuable as a rook. Again, pushing the f-pawn against the kingside fianchetto formation is thematic and absolutely natural
@willianbueno72936 жыл бұрын
TKS Danny master analysis!
@Erwt646 жыл бұрын
Very well presented!
@joseluisbruna47926 жыл бұрын
Great analysis
@ZoomAmer6 жыл бұрын
Thanks a lots These video's are really interesting
@wonderbucket12424 жыл бұрын
I think leela underpromotes to mess with the calculations of the other AI. Like, if the other AI bases it's decisions on material value on the board.
@billprovince87596 жыл бұрын
I was curious about trying b4 *and then* f4. I didn't actually analyze this, but I liked the idea of pushing back the queen to a6 where it is hidden. Perhaps the issue is two-pronged: first, at a6, after the b6 knight moves, the queen helps defend 6th rank. Second, the c4 pawn becomes a protected passed pawn. Thoughts?
@afbdreds6 жыл бұрын
Danny anlysing NN chess games is ebest thing ever
@modolief6 жыл бұрын
Danny: Can you comment on the hardware conditions of Leela vs the AB engines? One thing I'd really like to know regarding the cccc is: how much power does Leela use on her hardware vs how much the AB engines draw on their separate hardware? To me this is the fairest means of comparing disparate hardware systems.
@x_sphinz29825 жыл бұрын
Does anyone have the playlist with the songs that were played during the livestream of this tournament? I just love them but can't find them anymore.
@dilyarm94776 жыл бұрын
Great evaluation, thanks
@proflaxis69686 жыл бұрын
Danny: I have just promoted you to my favourite chess game analyst. Awesome job.
@hazelelloyd4 жыл бұрын
Danny, that was absolutely fun to watch!! Trademark Leela under promotes to troll its victim :-)
@c4b-bage6 жыл бұрын
I am a mediocre player and when Danny started hyping about the crushing move I immediately thought about f4. Proud of myself. Now i'll unpause the video and figure out why.
@maksymiliank51356 жыл бұрын
I love the fact Leela underpromotes her pawns. It makes me smile how ignorant and confident she became, trying to humiliate her opponents
@rlyehslament90646 жыл бұрын
Does anyone know why Leela does this underpromotion thing? Isn't it pretty much always mathematically correct and stupid not to bring a queen in? Would you really rather a knight than a queen? Wouldn't a queen checkmate faster in pretty much every case?
@russellfroggatt6 жыл бұрын
A good example of Leela's sacrificial style.
@trickytrock89246 жыл бұрын
Were can I watch the games?
@AgentSmith9116 жыл бұрын
Google search "CCCC chess tournament"
@frankrodriguez68516 жыл бұрын
I dont know why you call it underpromotion. A pawn that becomes a knight is always promotion.
@tomyman6 жыл бұрын
6:04 "their neural networks"? nirvana is a traditional engine...
@brabhamfreaman1666 жыл бұрын
So he misspoke? Delete the word “neural” or find someone more knowledgeable than I to argue that the generation-type 'ply' can make a traditional engine's processes somehow meet the definition of some form of neural network? Can ya sleep now? 😩
@RT-eh3uu6 жыл бұрын
If you know anything about Mr. Rensch: he probably wasn't being serious when he said that. But if you're qualified, I do think Chess.com is looking to hire "Director of Cognitive Neuroscience" who will work directly with their Director of Content! They're hoping to create ways for players to move the pieces with their mind.
@mattbeckwith6 жыл бұрын
What about b4 stead of f4?
@anvb5a14 жыл бұрын
Leela and Tal would have been good friends!
@maleclukas4 жыл бұрын
I wondered how Komodo changed his strength suddenly. It's almost half of tournament, haha
@realbeetlejuice6 жыл бұрын
chess.com, we need the Karjakin speedchess video up!!!!!!!!!!
@DarkSkay6 жыл бұрын
I'd play f4 almost instantly in a blitz game, because it is principled and leads to the most interesting position. Considering the closed and sharp nature of the postion, and that the Bd3 is currently doing more work, than both (!) black rooks... easiest exchange sac of all times. You'd have to glue the f-pawn to the chessboard, to stop the itch ;)
@B3Band6 жыл бұрын
14:58 Didn't know it was that kind of party!
@axelhoward13996 жыл бұрын
I wanto see a Magnus vs Lc0 game.
@wiadroman6 жыл бұрын
"Stop playing with your food Leela" :-D
@morumaster13016 жыл бұрын
This is stockfish right?
@keithr17696 жыл бұрын
Great job, fascinating how engines are using human developed chess theory and not creating their own.
@krzysztofq74206 жыл бұрын
stockfish 9 on lichess found f4 within few seconds.. i gave it 1GB ram
@RodMacNevin6 жыл бұрын
Ssh. Don't use the S-word. here. They have a business deal with Komodo.
@krzysztofq74206 жыл бұрын
14:43 but for this move (bh6) it took stockfish 40 seconds to call it as best.
@RodMacNevin6 жыл бұрын
Danny, Komodo is not the strongest commercially available chess engine. Stockfish is, and I think you know that.
@ElaineAlt6 жыл бұрын
what is "underpromotion"?
@notanurag61766 жыл бұрын
Elaine Alt when you don’t promote to a queen and instead choose Knight, Bishop, etc
@ElaineAlt6 жыл бұрын
@@notanurag6176 thanks
@limitedinfinity50956 жыл бұрын
Naaaah suren already covered this
@moazph6 жыл бұрын
I lose in chess every time in the Endgame if I have a queen and two rooks and likewise my opponent.
@emadkhayat71586 жыл бұрын
You are awesome pro
@allyc19656 жыл бұрын
Why refer to Nirvana as she all the time?
@BrokenG-String6 жыл бұрын
Marry me Leela
@mohsendoraghi81644 жыл бұрын
We create these chess engines to calculate these variations for us so we can use our time instead to go to the beach and get laid.
@jimmyfoley46346 жыл бұрын
Gotta love exf8=N!?
@ralphinoful6 жыл бұрын
It honestly looks like the under-promotion is a flaw in machine learning. Extremely rare things in machine learning could have big consequences. The way the machine works in an extremely crude sense is, it plays the same game over and over again, making small changes. Promoting a pawn is rare in a game of chess, and the first couple of times it's happened, it could have been advantageous to under-promote. In which case, it would skew the other games and have them under-promote as well. But since promoting in general is so great, even if you do promote, under-promoting might be enough to put the nail in the coffin. So honestly, I think that the under-promotions are not accurate, and eventually after more games are played, they will go away.
@JB9406 жыл бұрын
Leela doesn't have the notion of quick or slow winning, if she's certain both moves are winning, she basically doesn't care. That's why she sometimes underpromotes. But in the current position, it's actually accurately the best move. Even stockfish gives it best rating after a while. The idea being, that black should always capture the promoted piece. Rook and queen force this with check. If you promote to knight and black doesn't take (as seen here) the quickest mate is 4 moves earlier according to SF.
@ralphinoful6 жыл бұрын
I'm 99.99% sure that winning fast is embedded in the fitness function. In fact, there's a variable in the source code ( github.com/glinscott/leela-chess/blob/master/lc0/src/engine.cc ), total_moves_time and movestogo. Keeping track of the total moves, and the moves until the 50 move mark. The person coding it would give Leela an incentive to end the game before the time runs out, which would make Leela incentived to play in the least amount of moves possible, to cut down on calculation time.
@JB9406 жыл бұрын
@@ralphinoful true, but for Leela test 10 (10xxxx) 50 move plane was empty. So Leela did not care unless it saw the impending draw
@gJonii6 жыл бұрын
"So honestly, I think that the under-promotions are not accurate, and eventually after more games are played, they will go away. " More than that, afaik it's a bug where Neural Network is asked to tell what type of promotion it wants to make, and then the actual promotion will be different, throwing off the learning because it learns wrong promotion commands to be used. So it wants a certain type of piece when promoting but gets a different one, but since it's just a neural net, it doesn't know how to complain, it just plays with it.
@d0wnl0ad4 жыл бұрын
I believe it's under promoting to decrease the likelihood of a stalemate
@geladaizlabon36056 жыл бұрын
fawn pawn!!!!
@D1G1TALFOX6 жыл бұрын
Thanks . . . 🦊 😎
@AdityaSharma0016 жыл бұрын
Awesome man!! #Cheetah
@rabaromar410011 ай бұрын
Game 45 watched ❤
@evgenys1776 жыл бұрын
AWESOME.
@Durian_Defense6 жыл бұрын
Why did Leela underpromote to Knight? Since when did AI engines start playing with their food/prey? Engines don't have dry sense of humour, do they?
@DrVonHugenstein6 жыл бұрын
I had a similar problem with a NN solving a different problem, basically once it realised it can loose the piece it might be assessing that lossing a knight is better than losing a queen, since it doesn't evaluate in the usual minmax way
@kylen64306 жыл бұрын
Max Dooley I don’t think this is the reason...that losing a Knight is better than loosing a queen...because we notice in this case the knight isn’t taken anyways.
@markfrancis65086 жыл бұрын
Isn't it nice to have a game of chess with a human, and have a joke and laugh, if you won or lose?
@booni51146 жыл бұрын
THAT BEARD IS DISGUSTING and I LOVE IT DANNY.
@extollo6 жыл бұрын
speaking of initiative vs material -- here leela is down 2 rooks & a knight as black and it's a 0.00 position. white eventually misplays. wacky kzbin.info/www/bejne/nX67YoasYreMiZo
@leonmozambique5336 жыл бұрын
I want to see lc0 play as black
@SVP-uy9qb6 жыл бұрын
His mouth makes a weird noise
@diwakarkoirala48794 жыл бұрын
agadmator is a lot better than this.
@KINGBOSS08-mmk6 жыл бұрын
First
@devmarketing69652 жыл бұрын
You are so boring man,pls generate some interest,keep on talking,pls be specific.