香港靚蠔-80後蠔民斥資600萬起全港唯一蠔淨化場 70歲蠔民踩板出海養蠔 自製臘鴨蠔飯勁有油香

80後的陳樹鋒是第五代蠔民，兩年前接手父親百多個蠔排，眼看大眾對流浮山蠔失去信心，不惜斥資300萬元，另獲漁業持續發展基金資助300萬元，建全港第一個蠔淨化場。阿鋒道：「起淨化場好辛苦。我本身沒有物業，是好辛苦地、全家總動員拿筆錢出來。」加入夕陽行業、還要貼錢做，值得嗎？「香港人現時怕流浮山蠔不乾淨、不安全，唯一的途徑就是令牠乾淨。」
hk.appledaily....
流浮山蠔業已超過300年歷史。這兒絕大部份的村民不是姓陳便是姓曾。原來他們大多是從同樣盛產蠔的寶安沙井移居過來。88歲陳銳成是第一代蠔民，亦是沙井人，13歲便出來養蠔，養蠔養了75年，現已交給下一代打理。「沙井人無人耕田，個個都種蠔搵食。以前的人養蠔，起碼都有百多個蠔排。」至今仍活躍的蠔民，還有70歲的沙井人祥哥祥嫂。他們在70年代扎根於流浮山，過的仍是傳統蠔民生活。
hk.appledaily....
影片:
【我是南丫島人】23歲仔獲cafe免費借位擺一人咖啡檔 $6,000租住350呎村屋：愛這裏互助關係 (果籽 Apple Daily) ( • 23歲仔$6,000租南丫島350呎村屋 C... )
【香港蠔 足本版】流浮山白蠔收成要等三年半 天然生曬肥美金蠔日產僅50斤 即撈即食中環名人坊蜜餞金蠔 西貢六福酥炸生蠔 (果籽 Apple Daily) ( • 流浮山白蠔收成要等三年半 天然生曬肥美金蠔日... )
【這夜給惡人基一封信】大佬茅躉華日夜思念 回憶從8歲開始：兄弟有今生沒來世 (壹週刊 Next) ( • 回憶從8歲開始：兄弟有今生沒來世 這夜給惡人... )
【太子餃子店】新移民唔怕蝕底自薦包餃子 粗重功夫一腳踢 老闆刮目相看邀開店：呢個女人唔係女人(飲食男女 Apple Daily) • 新移民唔怕蝕底太子開餃子店 自薦包餃子 粗重... )
【娛樂人物】情願市民留家唔好出街聚餐 鄧一君兩麵舖執笠蝕200萬 (蘋果日報 Apple Daily) ( • Video )
果籽 ：as.appledaily.com
籽想旅行：travelseed.hk
健康蘋台： applehealth.com.hk
動物蘋台： applepetform.com
#蠔 #香港蠔 #流浮山 #蠔民 #蠔排
#果籽 #StayHome #WithMe #跟我一樣 #宅在家

[@kwanyc81]

流浮山最出名緊係刀手啦 大量出口供應元朗國

[@cyl.7660]

飲鏃

[@cyl.7660]

鏃

[@andylee671031]

講到食蠔,小時候的我恨食到不得之了,但相隔多年,流浮山的生蠔,我只會作為熟食😅

[@queriamorir5662]

而家唔敢食流浮山的蠔

[@abcfreehkhk359]

好喜歡亞嬸这种小人物对自己地方的文化热愛。

[@chito9422]

東方日報A1：流浮山毒蠔攻陷全港　食環懶把關 2021年5月10日 笑左

[@chikeunglau2288]

我都係流浮山長大 ， 天水圍嗰啲魚塘就係用 流浮山嗰啲海砂用大收管吸過去啲魚塘填平跟住起樓 天水圍住咗幾十萬人啲污水就係排喺流浮山海中心， 食唔食得過就自己諗呀！

[@sphere6860]

我比較好奇這樣不會長青苔嗎?

[@boxm3707]

香港蠔加油啦

[@ch888333]

小桃園酒家 689黑金背景

[@teddyboy999]

病毒令到全世界停頓，的海水乾淨晒，令到今年的蚝超大隻超鮮甜，同廣島蚝完全無分別。

[@chito9422]

然而之後幾月後就被檢測出重金屬含量皆超標

[@moonc5428]

咁多刀手緊係重金屬啦

[@richardlam1704]

最喜愛吃物蠔..等等.原來咁多工夫🤔🙏🙏

[@leopardwin8341]

真係好辛苦 仲要養2.5年 就算養幾批 平均都起碼每次等1年 養肥就話有得賺下 仲要時不時要填海又攪污染 投資個幾百萬都驚佢血本無歸

[@Albion101]

流浮山啲蠔香港人都有份養，深圳人嘅功勞最大，重金屬同埋污染物養大晒

[@lukkimho]

流浮山最出名係咩？係刀手呀😂

[@roychan930]

Exact7Ly

[@TheCashVoucher]

愿聞其詳

[@raphaelman5071]

乜唔係藍地出名咩？

[@Pedro-kq7fr]

流浮山 最出名 滴眼水

[@leetaihk3421]

利泰大樓仍然有很多老鼠。 CONFIDENTIAL AND URGENT! From: An owner of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 太子道西101-107號利泰大樓業主 Mobile Phone No.: To: The Legislative Council of the HKSAR, the Public Complaints Office and all members of the Legislative Council of the HKSAR Dear All, Re: Complaints about the Unauthorized Use of the Public/Common Areas at Mezzanine Floor (M/F) of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong and/or Other Public/Common Areas of Lee Tai Building by the Owner/Tenant of G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building and/or Other Relevant Owners/Tenants of Lee Tai Building and Complaints about the Noises and Vibrations caused by the Owner/Tenant of G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building and/or Other Relevant Owners/Tenants of Lee Tai Building [檔案編號：2-4933763902 (assigned by 1823)] [檔案編號：EP3/K03/RE/00034760-18 (assigned by EPD)] The case number assigned by The Ombudsman is OMB2019/1791. 投訴太子道西101-107號利泰大廈地下食肆懷疑違例改建抽風系統 (檔案編號：2-4933763902 assigned by FEHD) Complaints against the Buildings Department Complaints against Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun and Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong Complaints against Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong With reference to the captioned, the attached e-mails and the related documents, I understand that it may not be easy to fully resolve all the issues of my complaints before the end of November, 2020. However, as the Legislative Council members of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong would leave the Legislative Council in December, 2020, the things which you can do and must do immediately are as follows: 1. Focus on the content and the questions in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 with reference no.: SFS-2020-CNY-160 from Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, to the Buildings Department of Hong Kong; 2. Focus on the responses of the Buildings Department in the letter dated 04 August, 2020 from the Buildings Department of Hong Kong to Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, with reference no.: EB/5120/61/T02N; 3. Focus on my arguments relating to the content and the questions mentioned in 1. above and/or the responses of the Buildings Department mentioned in 2. above. Such arguments are stated in my previous e-mails sent to you. 4. Understand why the Buildings Department must fully understand the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 Building Management Ordinance of the Laws of Hong Kong including section 18 and section 34I etc. of CAP 344 of the Laws of Hong Kong for executing any of its duties relating to unauthorized building works or approval of works/drawings etc.. 5. Summon 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) to testify and give evidence as per Article 73 of the Basic Law with respect to the captioned complaints and ask 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) the following question(s): "Has 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) obtained the consent of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building as per Cap 344 Building Management Ordinance for converting the relevant common parts of Lee Tai Building in the way mentioned before for its own use? If so, 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) is to provide all the relevant evidence(s) as per Article 73 of the Basic Law." 6. Ask the Buildings Department the relevant questions relating to the captioned and/or the matters/issues mentioned above including, but not limited to, those questions in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 with reference no.: SFS-2020-CNY-160 mentioned in 1. above and request the Buildings Department to respond to such questions properly and immediately; 7. Decide whether the Buildings Department has violated Article 64 of the Basic Law and/or subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 Buildings Ordinance and/or any other enactment(s); www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_4.html Article 64 of the Basic Law: The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region must abide by the law and be accountable to the Legislative Council of the Region: it shall implement laws passed by the Council and already in force; it shall present regular policy addresses to the Council; it shall answer questions raised by members of the Council; ............................. www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap123?xpid=ID_1438402641778_001 Cap. 123 Buildings Ordinance 16.Grounds on which approval or consent may be refused (1)The Building Authority may refuse to give his approval of any plans of building works where- ........................................................................... (d)the carrying out of the building works shown thereon would contravene the provisions of this Ordinance or of any other enactment, or would contravene any approved or draft plan prepared under the Town Planning Ordinance (Cap. 131); 8. Decide whether Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Council members of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, fail to execute some of their powers and duties as per Article 73 of the Basic Law; 9. Ask Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun and Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong Complaints against Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong the relevant questions relating to the matters/issues mentioned above and request them to respond to such questions immediately. Some of the documents/e-mails mentioned above are attached to this e-mail for your easy reference. These documents/e-mails were sent to you previously. Of course, they are not exhaustive. The following weblinks are attached for your easy reference: www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclawtext/chapter_4.html www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap123?xpid=ID_1438402641778_001 www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344 www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344?xpid=ID_1438403038456_002 I do not consent to the disclosure of any part of any information sent or to be sent to you by me to anyone except the legislative councillors and/or the personnel handling my complaints, because I have to protect my privacy. From: An owner of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong, 太子道西101-107號利泰大樓業主 Mobile Phone No.:

[@Fishandchips463]

NO NO NO，香港數據？而家係中共下既香港唔該follow歐盟要求，香港大學同政府講咩都假。重金屬無降解，仲要對住共產國出水口，如果想香港人吃得安心，賺錢賺得心安理得，長長久久，自己做多D做唔到唔好揾香港人條命黎換錢。

[@teddyboy999]

阿祥嫂廚藝好得

[@ccc212]

D老店成日話無人接手.但又唔收徒弟俾人繼續頂手.

[@tkyg3852]

全部都係想屋企自己人繼承生意

[@Ckaries]

封建制度

[@qq422535409]

@@Ckaries 你有多層樓 或家業 會唔會大方到俾其他先

[@cher987654321]

產量唔多，價錢就一定有返咁上下。但價錢有返咁上下，我就唔會食本地豪啦！除非我好想支持呢啲已經有幾球嘢資助嘅本地產業囉！😅

[@lukkimho]

嚴格黎講果幾百萬唔係資助 而應該係賠償 而且金額係遠遠不唔足以cover損失 識玩就應該搵埋啲環保組織告鳩港共政府

[@heichileung1551]

地址喺邊？

[@rnewman65123]

🦾 生食蠔,真係要好講水質！ 流浮山光景式微！要挽回老饕信心,要落很大功夫！ 重振,大環境未必可順意,靠天養已受人為發展而影響！消費者重視健康,怕污染. 有沒有另一途經用人工培殖於人造生態環境中？再嚮名堂？

[@yhl9798]

唔好玩啦大佬，事實係水質唔掂規模又做唔到人地咁大。你話咩香港蠔傳統產業又有意義點點都無用啦。你想搞點香港蠔就唔好喺咁香港香港消費感情啦。你估比人淘汰係無原因咩，一味死守家族產業又唔改變有咩用。

[@hotin1108]

關咩事 , 水質先係最致命

[@UvuvwevwevweOnyetenyevweUg-z7n]

一講起 流浮山 我只會諗起刀手 太出名了

[@yinzzyyinzzy1266]

流浮山生蠔驗到好多微塑膠。蠔鼓都吾敢食

[@milesm6931]

香港蠔。加油啦

[@tsunningwah3471]

豪哥🤣

[@拾指緊扣]

大陸人鐘意米俾佢地食重污染蠔了，香港人食開入口野，安全d.

[@she9920]

后海灣D水能見度近附0,養出嚟蠔搵鬼食咩

[@carsonpopo8734]

能見度係因為河口區 潮汐進退都會夾住大量沙泥

[@xx328xxable]

香港政府啲數據都好信嘅

[@chanwancheong8264]

咁辛苦既行業点豪得起啊！

[@him226]

加油啦～我都係蠔民

[@nerochang]

重金屬蠔壯陽 賣番大陸內循環

[@badman10022]

更係出面冇野做返去啦, 應該有新聞係呢D , 例如外國有研究太空科技唔做,返黎幫手 哈哈

[@off9616]

3:45 唔係講笑 咁問法真係幾無禮貌下

[@kwokfrankie9534]

拍得好靚！！

[@keigorjai01]

蠔仔蠟鴨飯真係聽都未聽過，就咁諗應該好食，揾日試下整先

[@fatwah2323]

好污糟！個D排水數據！唔好玩

[@tcw127845]

龍鼓灘個海灘黑色，你D刀手食埋我果份，無污染笑左

[@horacewonghy]

5:23 國標......

[@asf5735]

有重金屬呀⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯

[@wongwong2020]

蠔係好味，有營養，但咁污糟真係要忍下口！

[@kappayeung4725]

香港豪 加油啦

[@greenhat7618]

你唔做返好個brand name整幾多淨化都冇用，會食蠔嘅基本都唔會揀香港蠔

[@donlau6702]

採訪之前有無了解過人地咩背景？

[@川普和津實]

蘋果而家勁多間諜喺入面幫人洗白 三百萬攤大手板問689拎啦

[@ey1424]

20190416

[@snoopyfong]

要發展傳統行業 只會被政府打壓

[@devilambrose]

“國家標準” XDDDDDDDDDD 大佬， 米話我嗯支持本地有野。。。。。。救命。

[@ar1hk]

真係慘，成餐飯淨係得蠔食

[@IamUSER369]

4:06 會唔會係無錢，扮曬野話攞曬積蓄

[@jonathanngai5956]

up mud

[@aroys900]

人地煮咁多野比你地食,想知果籽其實有冇比返錢人地?

[@jokervendetta7431]

如果唔係大陸呀 我地而家個個都會食香港蠔...

[@asf5735]

D水污衊到呀⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯

[@yanchen6134]

型英帥靚正=）

[@henrichan2825]

「你唔比心機讀書嘅」😂😂串

[@andrawatson2738]

明慧网二零二一年二月七日】在中国新年即将到来之际，二零二一年一月三十一日上午，洛杉矶部份法轮功学员来到南加州橙县喷泉谷（Fountain Valley）公园，向李洪志师父送上深深的感恩和诚挚的新年祝福。 活动中，法轮功学员们打出“恭祝师尊新年好”、“师父 谢谢您”、“法轮大法好”、“真善忍好”等横幅，在阳光的照射下分外明亮、美好。法轮功学员双手合十，齐声道--“恭祝师尊新年好！” '图1：中国新年来临之际，洛杉矶部份法轮功学员在加州橙县向法轮大法创始人李洪志先生拜年。' 图1：中国新年来临之际，洛杉矶部份法轮功学员在加州橙县向法轮大法创始人李洪志先生拜年。 当天前来参加活动的法轮功学员来自不同行业，他们的年龄不等，男女老少，各有不同的经历；但是都有一个共同点--通过修炼法轮功， 得到健康的身心，成为更加善良的好人。 修炼大法走出迷途 于二零零一年得法，修炼法轮功至今将近二十年的吴奕璇，目前在一家企业从事会计工作。借此中国新年来临之际，她说：“我想要表达对师父的感激，谢谢师父的救度。” '图2：吴奕璇感恩李洪志师父' 图2：吴奕璇感恩李洪志师父 吴奕璇表示，修炼大法后，自己身心受益。她说自己的鼻子以前患有严重的过敏，“看过中医、西医都没有效，炼功一个礼拜后，鼻子过敏的症状就开始好转，后来就彻底好了。” 最让她感到惊喜的是，修炼后她觉得自己，从原本的悲观，变为可以乐观看待人生中的大小事。她说自己以前是个有点自闭、忧郁的人，爱钻牛角尖，“我非常悲观的时候，甚至想要走上绝路”。修炼大法后，她变了，变得开朗了，她说：“大法开阔了我的视野，我的心胸变得宽敞。” 吴奕璇表示，这种改变对她来说，那是一种重生的体验。“我真的不知道该如何表达对师父的感恩。” 吴奕璇说：“法轮功洪传世界已经有二十九年了，为什么过去二十多年（中共）对法轮功打压，反而有越来越多人知道法轮功真相？就是因为法轮大法真的太好了。希望大家都能敞开心胸认识法轮功，会给你带来不同的视野、新的生命。”

[@asf5735]

千其吾好食呀⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯

[@ch888333]

水質太污糟

[@Ckaries]

打手AS咁得閒留咁多言🤣

[@zhengsng6203]

七老八十仲自称自己为小姐？？

[@hykmkwai]

正苦送錢比人做生意

[@paikboss]

養鐵咩...收爐啦...

[@joyjoyjoychanable]

粒粒都辛苦

[@低技術的普通人]

小桃園😂攪鬼食

[@kkking6429]

個博士九成係蠔老闆條女。

[@wilraver2008]

讀唔成書嘅就只好繼後燈火

[@andrawatson2738]

遵循真、善、忍　走过二十年人生路 二十年是一段不短的时光，而对乔安娜（Johanna）来说，那是一段从叛逆少女走向知性女性的过程。她这二十年的人生路，因修炼法轮大法而变得精彩和美好。 '图3：乔安娜说：“恭祝师父新年快乐，谢谢师父！”' 图3：乔安娜说：“恭祝师父新年快乐，谢谢师父！” 来自奥地利的乔安娜是一名艺术家，同时是新大师学院（New Masters Academy）的项目总监。 回忆起自己初次听闻法轮大法的机缘，她说：“我在奥地利时，从母亲那了解到法轮大法。我母亲当时有很多健康问题，还是一个很悲观的人。但当她开始修炼后，我看到了发生在她身上的变化，这让我对法轮大法充满了好奇。那时候我还是个十几岁的孩子。修炼后， 我学会了遵循真、善、忍的真理，做一个更好的人，而这真的改变了我的人生。” 乔安娜说：“我现在算得上是一个遇事从容冷静的人。但过去的我并非如此，之前，我是一个叛逆少女。”法轮大法教导人以真、善、忍为原则，修身养性，她说：“修炼这么长时间，我学会了包容。当我遇到麻烦时，我会静心思考自己的问题，我学会了在冲突中反思自己。”因此，“我和丈夫的关系非常融洽”，因为，当遇到冲突时，“我会不断尝试审视自己的内心。” 这种通过修炼后的真实改变，也让乔安娜在事业上得以受益。她说：“我是一名艺术家，通过修炼法轮大法，我明白了美和艺术对人类的重要性。修炼提升了我对美和艺术的认知，提高了我在艺术作品方面的造诣。我可以和人们分享这种美，而且我们学院也正在教人们与传统西方艺术相连，重新认识传统艺术。” 一晃二十年过去了，乔安娜说：“在修炼的过程中，我在不断的提升自己。” 当走过这段人生旅途，乔安娜内心无比感恩，她说：“非常感谢师父把大法带到这个世界。”最后她说：“恭祝师父新年快乐，谢谢师父！”

[@asf5735]

有毒家

[@asf5735]

吊，都係吾可以生食。。。。。

[@asf5735]

吾好食呀⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯

[@asf5735]

食死人呀⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯⋯

[@laulexus4525]

食深圳蠔

[@asf5735]

食壞人

[@nchen1826]

其实可以不卖大陆，赚了大陆的钱，又说便宜又贱

[@asf5735]

又屎又尿

[@eugene7145]

clss

[@ceahehehe]

ft 试当真