AHMED And Eman of the world to be a good one for the kids and the kids to be able for their birthday and to know each other's each and every day ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته مساء الخير يا قلبي انتي والله العظيم اني احبك في الله كبير يا قلبي انتي والله العظيم اني احبك في الله كبير يا قلبي انتي والله العظيم اني احبك في الله كبير يا قلبي انتي والله العظيم اني احبك في الله كبير يا قلبي انتي والله العظيم اني احبك في الله كبير يا قلبي انتي والله العظيم اني احبك في الله كبير يا قلبي انتي والله العظيم اني احبك في الله كبير يا قلبي انتي والله العظيم اني احبك في الله كبير يا قلبي انتي والله العظيم اني احبك في الله كبير يا قلبي انتي والله العظيم اني احبك في الله ثم عليك يا قلبي انتي والله العظيم اني احبك في الله ثم عليك يا قلبي انتي والله العظيم اني احبك في الله ثم عليك يا قلبي انتي ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
What is your parameters for evaluating the federal government, nonsense
@MikeMo-pj8ix3 ай бұрын
You said, "Amhara is created 30 years ago." From the very outset, this statement is fundamentally flawed. Not only does it dismiss the centuries-old historical, cultural, and political presence of the Amhara people, but it also ignores the fact that Amhara identity has been at the center of Ethiopia's political discourse for generations-whether seen as rulers, contributors, or, as some ethnic narratives suggest, oppressors. For over 80 ethnic groups in Ethiopia, Amhara was not just an identity but often a political symbol. It represented a force that had historically shaped the Ethiopian state, culture, and political structure. The narrative of the Amhara as an "oppressor" has been a political agenda used by various groups to fuel division and mobilize support for their causes. To now claim that the Amhara ethnicity was created only 30 years ago directly contradicts the very narratives that framed them as a historical force of influence for so long. Your discourse, frankly, is riddled with contradictions. On the one hand, you acknowledge the legitimacy of the Amhara struggle, stating that it is a formidable and challenging force for the government to defeat. You recognize the growing strength and momentum of the Amhara Fano armed struggle, implying that this movement is rooted in deep-seated historical and social grievances. But then, paradoxically, you claim that the Amhara as an ethnic group was "created" just 30 years ago, as though their entire historical existence and cultural identity are mere fabrications of recent political developments. This is an oversimplified narrative that cannot stand up to scrutiny. The reality is that the Amhara struggle, embodied by groups like Fano, is not a recent creation, nor is it an artificial construct. The Amhara people, like other ethnic groups in Ethiopia, have a rich and complex history that stretches back for centuries. They have contributed to the creation of the Ethiopian state, its leadership, and its cultural framework. The current armed struggle is not just a political rebellion but a manifestation of the long-standing tension between central authority and regional identities, and this is particularly true in the context of Ethiopia’s ethnically federal system. Moreover, it is clear from your analysis and media programs that your views are deeply informed by a particular political ideal-one that seeks to reshape Ethiopia’s current political and social realities into a form that fits your vision. Rather than engaging with the complex and evolving dynamics on the ground, it seems you are more concerned with promoting your own political model. You are telling us your ideal political dispensation rather than presenting the reality, a reality that is clearly far more nuanced and deeply rooted than your narrative allows. The rise of Amhara Fano is an undeniable reality. It represents a growing movement of resistance, not only against perceived government oppression but also as a defense of the Amhara people’s historical identity and territorial rights. You cannot simply erase or reduce this struggle to a "newly created" phenomenon, as it speaks to centuries of complex dynamics involving power, culture, and national identity. In short, your assertions, while bold, do not align with the actual historical and social realities in Ethiopia. The Amhara struggle is far older than the political changes of the last three decades, and its importance and legitimacy cannot be dismissed by revisionist claims. The rise of the Fano movement is a reflection of deeply entrenched grievances, and your portrayal of this movement as a sudden creation is as misleading as it is inaccurate.
If there is anyone who doesn't read but talk,it's you
@Fikru19483 ай бұрын
Guys, under any circumstances, I don't trust most of Tewodros's notion about the great people of Amharay ! The ultimate mission he received from our enemy is to spread rethorics that divide the popular movement of " Hizbawi Ginbar Amhara FANOS ⚠️ ⚠️